Home
Browse
Search
Statistics
About
Usage
PMID: 11585852
Smith SS, Liu X, Zhang ZR, Sun F, Kriewall TE, McCarty NA, Dawson DC
CFTR: covalent and noncovalent modification suggests a role for fixed charges in anion conduction.
J Gen Physiol. 2001 Oct;118(4):407-31.,
[PubMed]
Sentences
No.
Mutations
Sentence
Comment
7
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:7:25
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Covalent modification of
R334C
CFTR increased single-channel conductance determined in detached patches, but did not alter open probability.
Login to comment
25
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:25:0
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:25:10
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
R347C
and
R352C
were gifts of M. Akabas (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY) and used in their parent vector, pMN.
Login to comment
60
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:60:92
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Because preliminary experiments suggested that the single-channel conductance of unmodified
R334C
was much reduced from that seen with wt CFTR, we used symmetric bathing solutions containing Ͼ200 mM Cl for these studies.
Login to comment
73
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:73:42
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Because the single-channel conductance of
R334C
CFTR before modification by MTSET was very small, we could not rely upon amplitude histograms for reliable estimation of channel amplitudes at varying membrane potentials.
Login to comment
76
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:76:171
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
In a second set of experiments, MTSET was added to the patch pipette before seal formation and allowed to diffuse to the tip after seal formation, so that modification of
R334C
CFTR channels by MTSET could be monitored in real time.
Login to comment
107
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:107:97
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:107:336
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:107:107
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:107:346
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:107:16
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:107:322
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:107:26
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:107:329
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
The Function of
R334C
and
K335C
CFTR Was Modified by External MTSES or MTSET but the Function of
R347C
and
R352C
CFTR Was Not Modified by these Polar Thiol Reagents Fig. 3 summarizes the results of experiments in which MTSES, MTSET, or MTSEA (100 M-10 mM) were added to the solution bathing oocytes expressing wt,
R334C
,
K335C
,
R347C
, or
R352C
CFTR.
Login to comment
111
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:111:9
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:111:19
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
For both
R334C
and
K335C
CFTR, the results of modification by the negatively charged reagent (MTSES) generally agreed with those reported by Cheung and Akabas (1996).
Login to comment
112
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:112:4
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
For
R334C
CFTR, they reported ~40% decrease in the normalized current (@ -100 mV) and we observed ~70% decrease in the conductance (@Erev).
Login to comment
113
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:113:4
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
For
K335C
, they reported ~13% decrease in the normalized current (@ -100 mV) and we observed ~30% decrease in the conductance (@Erev).
Login to comment
115
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:115:87
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Cheung and Akabas (1996) reported that application of 1 mM MTSET to oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR reduced the normalized current (@ -100mV) by ~54%, and 2.5 mM MTSEA reduced the normalized current by ~35%.
Login to comment
116
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:116:96
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
In contrast, we found that the application of 100 M or 1 mM MTSET to oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR resulted in ~110% increase in the conductance, whereas 100 M or 1 mM MTSEA increased the conductance by ~70%.
Login to comment
117
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:117:4
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
For
K335C
CFTR, Cheung and Akabas (1996) reported that the application of 2.5 mM MTSEA resulted in ~20% decrease in the normalized current (@ -100 mV), whereas we observed ~20% increase in the conductance (@Erev).
Login to comment
122
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:122:77
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
Shown in Fig. 4 is a representative experiment in which an oocyte expressing
R347C
CFTR was exposed to MTS reagents.
Login to comment
124
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:124:183
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
The experiments were repeated with each of the compounds individually, both with and without prior exposure to 2-ME and in no case were we able to detect an effect on the function of
R347C
CFTR.
Login to comment
125
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:125:172
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
Cheung and Akabas (1996) initially reported that there was a %05ف decrease in the normalized current (@ -100 mV) after exposure of oocytes expressing
R347C
CFTR to 10 mM MTSES, 1 mM MTSET or 2.5 mM MTSEA.
Login to comment
126
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:126:101
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
However, in the course of subsequent studies by Cheung and Akabas (1997), it was discovered that the
R347C
construct had a substantial deletion.
Login to comment
127
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:127:66
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
MTSES or MTSET were reported as not reacting with the full-length
R347C
CFTR, and MTSEA was reported to cause a 19% inhibition.
Login to comment
129
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:129:15
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
In the case of
R352C
CFTR, our observations also differed substantially from those reported by Cheung and Akabas (1996, 1997).
Login to comment
131
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:131:119
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
In contrast, we were not able to detect effects of this magnitude applying either MTSES or MTSET to oocytes expressing
R352C
CFTR (Fig. 5 A).
Login to comment
133
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:133:108
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:133:118
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:133:94
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:133:101
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
Comparison of the effects of MTSES, MTSET, and MTSEA on the conductance of oocytes expressing
R334C
,
K335C
,
R347C
, or
R352C
CFTR.
Login to comment
137
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys 11585852:137:55
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg347Cys details
MTS reagents did not discernibly alter the function of
R347C
CFTR expressed in oocytes.
Login to comment
140
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:140:117
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
MTSET and MTSES, polar thiol reagents, did not produce a discernible alteration in conductance of oocytes expressing
R352C
CFTR.
Login to comment
144
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:144:94
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
(B) Addition of 1 mM MTSEA produced a sixfold increase in conductance of an oocyte expressing
R352C
CFTR not previously exposed to MTSET.
Login to comment
146
ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln 11585852:146:77
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln details
(C) MTSEA produced a twofold increase in conductance in an oocyte expressing
R352Q
CFTR, which spontaneously reversed when MTSEA was removed from the perfusate.
Login to comment
148
ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln 11585852:148:62
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln details
ABCC7 p.Arg352His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352His 11585852:148:71
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352His details
Changes of this magnitude are also seen in oocytes expressing
R352Q
or
R352H
CFTR, but were not seen in oocytes expressing wt CFTR.
Login to comment
151
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:151:0
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:151:217
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
R352C
CFTR Function Is Modified by Addition of 1 mM MTSEA to the Perfusate, However the Effect Is Not Cysteine-specific Shown in Fig. 5 B is the result of a representative exper- iment in which an oocyte expressing
R352C
CFTR was exposed to 1 mM MTSEA; the result being a sixfold increase in conductance.
Login to comment
153
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:153:313
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Consistent with such a view, we found that after removing the reagent from the perfusate, the reaction spontaneously reversed over a period of 30 min, as expected if endogenous reducing agents, such as glutathione and free cysteine, were breaking the disulfide bond. In contrast, exposure of an oocyte expressing
R334C
CFTR to 1 mM MTSEA for 3 min produced an increase in conductance that remained elevated after washing out the reagent until a reducing agent, 1 mM 2-ME, was added to the perfusate (see Fig. 6 A).
Login to comment
154
ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln 11585852:154:101
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln details
ABCC7 p.Arg352His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352His 11585852:154:126
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352His details
Importantly, we also obtained a transient response to the application of MTSEA in oocytes expressing
R352Q
CFTR (Fig. 5 C) or
R352H
CFTR (unpublished data).
Login to comment
157
ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln 11585852:157:271
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Gln details
Guinamard and Akabas (1999) reported that substitutions for R352 (C, Q, and H) decreased the Cl-/Naϩ selectivity of CFTR as determined in detached patches (CHO cells), but we did not detect any alteration in the reversal potential associated with the expression of
R352Q
or H CFTR in oocytes.
Login to comment
159
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:159:25
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Covalent modification of
R334C
CFTR was stable, reproducible, and varied with the electrostatic nature of the moiety covalently attached.
Login to comment
166
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:166:45
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:166:236
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:166:55
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
The Effects of Polar MTS Reagents Applied to
R334C
and
K335C
CFTR Were Stable and Readily Reversible with 2-ME, which Is Consistent with the Formation of a Mixed Disulfide Bond The results of an experiment in which an oocyte expressing
R334C
CFTR was exposed to multiple MTS reagents and 2-ME are shown in Fig. 6 A.
Login to comment
177
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:177:0
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
R334C
CFTR did not exhibit time-dependent current relaxations.
Login to comment
178
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:178:109
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(A) Currents evoked by stepping the potential from -100 to ϩ60 mV for 234 ms from an oocyte expressing
R334C
CFTR after achieving steady-state activation with stimulatory cocktail and after a brief (3 min) exposure to 1 mM 2-ME.
Login to comment
181
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:181:88
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:181:130
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:181:180
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(D) I-V plots derived from the current traces shown in A-C: (closed circles) unmodified
R334C
CFTR; (open circles) MTSET modified
R334C
CFTR; and (closed triangles) MTSES modified
R334C
.
Login to comment
186
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:186:37
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
In view of the results obtained with
R352C
CFTR, we tested for effects of exposure to MTSET and MTSES using constructs bearing substitutions other than cysteine for R334.
Login to comment
187
ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln 11585852:187:106
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Ala
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Ala 11585852:187:97
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Ala details
MTSES, MTSET, or MTSEA (100 M or 1 mM) were added to the perfusate of oocytes expressing
R334A
or
R334Q
CFTR and produced no discernible effect on conductance (unpublished data).
Login to comment
188
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:188:5
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Only
R334C
exhibited an altered conductance in response to thiol-reactive reagents, which is consistent with the working hypothesis that the observed changes were due to the chemical modification of the cysteine substituted for R334.
Login to comment
189
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:189:20
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:189:241
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:189:30
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:189:250
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
The Modification of
R334C
and
K335C
CFTR by MTS Reagents Altered Both the Conductance and the Shape of the Current-Voltage Plot In the course of these experiments, it became apparent that a change in conductance of oocytes expressing either
R334C
or
K335C
CFTR induced by exposure to MTSET or MTSES was always accompanied by a concomitant change in the shape of the I-V plot.
Login to comment
191
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:191:231
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Shown in Fig. 7 are the results of a representative experiment in which currents were elicited by step changes in clamping potential from -100 mV to ϩ60 mV for either the unmodified (A), MTSET modified (B), or MTSES modified
R334C
CFTR (C), and the resulting I-V plots (D).
Login to comment
200
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:200:134
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
Fig. 8 A contains the results of a representative experiment in which the total membrane conductance (@ Erev) of an oocyte expressing
K335C
CFTR was measured as a function of time. After achieving steady-state activation, 2-ME (1 mM) was added to the bath and produced a slight increase in conductance.
Login to comment
207
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:207:107
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
As indicated above, modification by MTSES was very poorly reversible with 1 mM 2-ME at pH 7.5, and as with
R334C
, current relaxations in response to voltage steps were not detected in either the modified or unmodified state.
Login to comment
208
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:208:78
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:208:68
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
The results of covalent modification were qualitatively similar for
K335C
and
R334C
CFTR, but the greater magnitude of the effects for the latter construct led us to focus further studies on modification and substitution at position 334.
Login to comment
211
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:211:63
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Fig. 9 A shows the activated conductance of oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR measured just after modification by MTSET plotted against that measured just before modifi- Figure 8.
Login to comment
212
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:212:25
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
Covalent modification of
K335C
CFTR altered both conductance and shape of the I-V relation.
Login to comment
220
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:220:18
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
(C) I-V plots for
K335C
CFTR before and after application of MTS reagents.
Login to comment
225
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:225:219
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The slope of the line is 2.05 and the intercept is near 0, indicating that over the range of 50-250 S the effect of covalent modification was similar and, at pH 7.4, approximately doubled the conductance due to
R334C
CFTR.
Login to comment
226
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:226:135
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Also shown are several determinations made after activation by 200 M IBMX that yields approximately half-maximal activation of
R334C
CFTR (Wilkinson et al., 1996; Mansoura et al., 1998).
Login to comment
235
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:235:25
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:235:189
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Covalent Modification of
R334C
by MTSET Was Detectable as an Increased Single-channel Conductance The results of experiments in which single-channel currents were recorded before and after
R334C
CFTR was Figure 9.
Login to comment
237
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:237:38
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(A) Conductance of oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR determined just after modification by MTSET plotted versus premodification conductance.
Login to comment
244
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:244:63
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Dashed lines are mean values of RR for modified and unmodified
R334C
CFTR.
Login to comment
246
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:246:34
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The single-channel conductance of
R334C
CFTR was quite low (2.1ف pS, Fig. 10 A) even in the presence of elevated bath Cl concentration (210 mM).
Login to comment
252
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:252:109
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The inset to the I-V plot (Fig. 10 B) shows the distribution of open probabilities calculated for individual
R334C
CFTR channels recorded from patches detached either before or after exposure to MTSET.
Login to comment
255
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:255:121
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
As a more rigorous test for possible effects of covalent modification on Po, we monitored the modification of individual
R334C
CFTR channels using pipettes backfilled with a solution containing 100 M Figure 10.
Login to comment
256
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:256:25
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Covalent modification of
R334C
increased single-channel conductance.
Login to comment
257
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:257:52
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(A) Representative traces from an oocyte expressing
R334C
CFTR in the detached, inside-out patch configuration, Vm ϭ -80 mV.
Login to comment
266
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:266:138
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The solid lines are the best fit to the data by linear regression and correspond to a single-channel conductance of 1.2 pS for unmodified
R334C
CFTR (closed triangles) channels and 3.7 pS after MTSET modification (open triangles).
Login to comment
268
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:268:33
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Inset shows open probability for
R334C
CFTR channels at Vm ϭ -100 mV before and after treatment with MTSET (see materials and methods).
Login to comment
273
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:273:142
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Immediately after detaching the patch into a solution containing PKA and ATP, single channels exhibited the low conductance characteristic of
R334C
CFTR.
Login to comment
279
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:279:34
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Covalent modification of a single
R334C
CFTR channel in real time by including MTSET in the patch pipette.
Login to comment
283
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:283:74
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(C) Po determined before and after covalent modification for four, single
R334C
CFTR channels.
Login to comment
287
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:287:35
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
pH titration of oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR altered both the conductance and the shape of the I-V relation.
Login to comment
288
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:288:39
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(A) I-V plot from an oocyte expressing
R334C
CFTR.
Login to comment
293
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:293:16
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
pH Titration of
R334C
CFTR Altered Both the Conductance and the Shape of the Current-Voltage Relation The thiol moiety associated with a cysteine residue is expected to bear a time-average, partial negative charge, the magnitude of which will depend on the local pH and the pKa of the sulfhydryl group in situ.
Login to comment
296
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:296:72
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The conductance and the shape of the I-V relation of oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR was highly dependent on the bath pH, exhibiting an apparent pKa of 8.17 Ϯ 0.10 (n ϭ 3; Fig. 12 B).
Login to comment
298
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:298:38
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
If the pH-dependent effects seen with
R334C
CFTR are due to graded changes in the time-averaged, partial negative charge associated the sulfhydryl group at the 334 locus, then the magnitude of the change induced by chemical modification of this locus should be dependent on bath pH.
Login to comment
300
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:300:131
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Shown in Fig. 13 are the results of an experiment in which the effects of MTSET and MTSES on the conductance of oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR were compared at a bath pH of 6.0 (solid bar) and pH 9.0 (open bar).
Login to comment
306
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:306:46
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Functional effect of covalent modification of
R334C
CFTR was dependent on the bath pH.
Login to comment
310
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:310:46
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Shown in Fig. 14 are the results of modifying
R334C
CFTR with two "neutral" reagents, NEM and MTSHE.
Login to comment
313
ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln 11585852:313:38
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln details
The conductance of oocytes expressing
R334Q
CFTR was independent of pH and was not greatly altered by NEM.
Login to comment
314
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:314:31
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Exposure of oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR to MTSHE at acidic pH produced an effect reminiscent of MTSES, a conductance decrease, as if negative charge had been added.
Login to comment
317
ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln 11585852:317:31
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Gln details
Exposure of oocytes expressing
R334Q
CFTR to MTSHE produced only small changes in conductance.
Login to comment
318
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:318:149
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:318:16
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:318:173
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
pH Titration of
R334H
CFTR Altered Conductance and the Shape of the I-V Relation It was of interest to compare the response to changes in bath pH of
R334C
CFTR with that of
R334H
CFTR.
Login to comment
320
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:320:106
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
An I-V plot from a representative experiment in which the pH of the solution bathing an oocyte expressing
R334H
CFTR was acidified from 7.4 to 6.02 and then 4.80 is shown in Fig. 15 A.
Login to comment
324
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:324:102
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:324:111
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
Stepwise acidification of the bath led to stepwise increases in the conductance of oocytes expressing
R334C
or
R334H
CFTR and corresponding, stepwise increases in the rectification ratio, whereas similar pH changes resulted in only modest changes in the conductance of oocytes expressing wt CFTR.
Login to comment
327
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:327:91
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:327:173
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:327:100
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:327:182
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
The observed changes seen with wt CFTR were opposite of those seen with oocytes expressing
R334C
or
R334H
CFTR, suggesting that the pH induced changes due to protonation of
R334C
or
R334H
were, if anything, slightly underestimated.
Login to comment
328
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:328:26
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:328:36
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
The distinct pKa`s of the
R334C
and
R334H
variants favor the notion that these pH-dependent effects are due to titration of the side chain at position 334, as opposed to a mutation-induced exposure of a titratable site at another locus (Coulter et al., 1995).
Login to comment
330
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:330:16
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Modification of
R334C
CFTR with neutral reagents caused pH-dependent changes in conductance.
Login to comment
331
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:331:48
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(A) Change in conductance of oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR when modified with either NEM or MTSHE at either pH 9.0 or pH 6.
Login to comment
341
ABCC7 p.Lys335Ala
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Ala 11585852:341:36
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Ala details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:341:26
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
However, for two mutants,
R334H
and
K335A
, the RR value clearly deviated significantly from that predicted by the general trend.
Login to comment
344
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:344:201
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:344:211
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
The Effects of Charge Deposition at Position 334 Were Consistent with the Predictions of Charged-vestibule Models for the Anion Conduction Path The results of covalent modification and pH titration of
R334C
and
R334H
CFTR, as well as the functional impact of amino acid substitutions at this site, pointed to an important role for the charge at position 334 in determining the conduction properties of CFTR.
Login to comment
349
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:349:123
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
To investigate the hypothesis that the coordinated changes in conductance and I-V shape seen with covalent modification of
R334C
CFTR could be attributed to a charge-induced change in the conduction properties of Figure 15.
Login to comment
350
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:350:35
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
pH titration of oocytes expressing
R334H
CFTR altered both the conductance and the shape of the I-V relation.
Login to comment
351
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:351:40
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
(A) I-V plots from an oocyte expressing
R334H
CFTR.
Login to comment
364
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:364:276
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(A) RR, determined as described in materials and methods, is plotted as a function of the net charge of the amino acid at position 334 at pH 7.4 where glutamic acid (E) is assigned a value of -1, cysteine (C) is assigned a value of -0.12 based on the apparent pKa of 8.17 for
R334C
CFTR, histidine (H), alanine (A), and glutamine (Q) are neutral, and lysine (K) and arginine (R) are assigned a value of ϩ1.
Login to comment
365
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys 11585852:365:244
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Lys335Cys details
(B) RR is plotted as a function of the net charge of the amino acid at position 335 where glutamic acid (E) and aspartic acid (D) were assigned a value of -1, alanine (A) was treated as neutral, cysteine (C) was also treated as neutral because
K335C
CFTR exhibited a smaller pH responses and its apparent pKa was not determined, and lysine (K) and arginine (R) were assigned a value of ϩ1.
Login to comment
372
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:372:40
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The effects of covalent modification of
R334C
CFTR could be simulated using charged vestibule models (see appendix).
Login to comment
373
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:373:72
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:373:116
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:373:157
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The data points shown are the same as in Fig. 7 D containing unmodified
R334C
CFTR (closed circles), MTSET-modified
R334C
(open circles), and MTSES-modified
R334C
(closed triangles).
Login to comment
377
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:377:28
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(closed circles) Unmodified
R334C
CFTR, ⌿o ϭ 0.
Login to comment
378
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:378:30
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(open circles) MTSET-modified
R334C
CFTR, ⌿o ϭ ϩ 50 mV.
Login to comment
379
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:379:34
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(closed triangles) MTSES-modified
R334C
CFTR, ⌿o ϭ -10 mV.
Login to comment
381
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:381:31
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:381:80
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:381:144
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Symbols as in C for unmodified
R334C
CFTR (⌿o ϭ 0), MTSET-modified
R334C
CFTR (⌿o ϭ ϩ50 mV), and MTSES-modified
R334C
CFTR (⌿o ϭ -10 mV).
Login to comment
382
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:382:181
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
(inset) Plots of percent increase (⌬g/ginitial ϫ 100%) in macroscopic CFTR conductance as function of bath Cl concentration for wt CFTR (open triangles) and unmodified
R334C
CFTR (closed circles).
Login to comment
386
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:386:43
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The I-V shape characteristic of unmodified
R334C
CFTR at pH 7.4 was simulated by adjusting the values of ⌿i and ⌿o, but these values must be viewed as arbitrary for at least two reasons.
Login to comment
391
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:391:57
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Based on the initial best fit to the data for unmodified
R334C
CFTR, PCl was fixed at 3.4 ϫ 10-7 cm3/s, and the premodification values of ⌿i and ⌿o were set at ϩ33 mV and -9 mV, respectively.
Login to comment
392
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:392:72
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
When these parameters were used to fit the data for covalently modified
R334C
CFTR, the effect of MTSET (PCl, ⌿i fixed) was attributed to a 24-mV increase in ⌿o and that of MTSES to a 39 mV reduction of ⌿o (Fig. 17 A).
Login to comment
397
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:397:13
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:397:23
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
Titration of
R334C
and
R334H
CFTR by varying bath pH was also well described by a continuum model in which the changes in conductance and I-V shape were largely attributed to changes in ⌿o (unpublished data).
Login to comment
399
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:399:78
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
To determine if saturation of anion flow rate might impact the conductance of
R334C
CFTR we compared the effects on oocyte conductance of raising the Cl concentration in the external bath.
Login to comment
404
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:404:71
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:404:243
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
In contrast, the maximum increase in conductance in oocytes expressing
R334C
CFTR (unmodified) was %07ف at 350 mM and consistent with an apparent K1/2 of 147 mM, in accord with the notion that Cl binds in the pore of the
R334C
CFTR, but with lower affinity than that seen with wt CFTR.
Login to comment
408
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:408:253
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
Initially, values of ⌿o and ⌿i were set to zero, the relative heights (see Fig. 17 legend) of equally spaced barriers and wells (without ionic repulsion) were chosen to reproduce the inward rectifying shape of the I-V curve for unmodified
R334C
CFTR.
Login to comment
411
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:411:110
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
We used two sets of energy values: one chosen to simulate a "low affinity" channel (K1/2 ϭ 115 mM) like
R334C
CFTR; and the other chosen to simulate a "high affinity" channel (K1/2 ϭ 38 mM) like wt CFTR.
Login to comment
417
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:417:88
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:417:98
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
Fig. 18 A summarizes the data from experiments in which charge changes were effected in
R334C
and
R334H
CFTR by means of chemical modification or pH titration.
Login to comment
420
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:420:74
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:420:204
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:420:253
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
Data points include charge changes brought about by thiol modification of
R334C
CFTR with positively charged reagents (open triangles), and negatively charged reagents (closed triangles), pH titration of
R334C
CFTR (closed circles), and pH titration of
R334H
CFTR (open circles).
Login to comment
423
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:423:22
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:423:153
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:423:425
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
ABCC7 p.Arg334His
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334His 11585852:423:275
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334His details
Thiol modification of
R334C
CFTR with positively charged reagents (open triangles) was treated as adding a single positive charge; thiol modification of
R334C
with negatively charged reagents (closed triangles) was treated as adding a single negative charge; pH titration of
R334H
CFTR (open circles) was treated as adding a time-average positive charge determined by the bath pH, assuming a pKa of 5.68; and pH titration of
R334C
CFTR (closed circles) was treated as adding a time-average negative charge determined by the bath pH assuming a pKa of 8.17.
Login to comment
429
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:429:49
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The points representing covalent modification of
R334C
by MTSET or MTSES were corrected for a small (14.5%) charge change predicted due to the protonation state of the cysteine at pH 7.4.
Login to comment
435
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:435:69
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
Even if we allow for the possibility of some modest accessibility of
R352C
, it is evident that the outer sites are highly reactive, whereas the inner sites are either not at all reactive or much less so.
Login to comment
442
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys 11585852:442:75
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg352Cys details
This is an important point because in the course of our experiments (e.g.,
R352C
CFTR) and those of others using cysteine accessibility or pH titration (Coulter et al., 1995; Akabas, 1998), it has become apparent that structural changes can render sites "distant" from the mutation accessible or titratable.
Login to comment
443
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:443:98
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The evidence for a single site of action of thiol reagents and protons is particularly strong for
R334C
CFTR as we were able to demonstrate a pH-dependent modulation of functional effects of covalent modification.
Login to comment
449
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:449:56
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The relatively low single-channel conductance seen with
R334C
CFTR (even at elevated Cl concentrations) before modification with MTSET and in the patient mutation R3334W (Sheppard et al., 1993) is consistent with the hypothesis that R334 is an important determinant of pore conductance.
Login to comment
452
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:452:283
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
It seems reasonable to conclude that the charge at this site is an important determinant of channel function, and although we speculate that R334 may lie in the pore (as discussed in the next section), it is important to note that covalent addition of a positively charged moiety to
R334C
CFTR (MTSET) did not rescue the wild-type phenotype.
Login to comment
453
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:453:74
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
The single-channel conductance of 3.7 pS seen after MTSET modification of
R334C
was less than half of that seen with wt CFTR (8.6 pS) in the same experimental setting.
Login to comment
456
ABCC7 p.Arg334Trp
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Trp 11585852:456:14
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Trp details
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:456:272
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
One of these,
R334W
, was studied by Sheppard et al. (1993) who reported that single-channel currents were undetectable in patches detached from HeLa cells in symmetric Cl of 061ف mM, which is consistent with the reduced conductance reported here for
R334C
CFTR.
Login to comment
473
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys 11585852:473:164
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Arg334Cys details
If we assume that the outward rectification seen with wt CFTR is due in part to block of Cl efflux by intracellular anions, then the inward rectification seen with
R334C
CFTR could be attributed, in part, to a reduction in this blocking effect in the mutant channel.
Login to comment
483
ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys 11585852:483:201
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys details
The conductance of oocytes expressing the I379C construct was reduced by MTS reagents (MTSET, MTSEA, and MTSES) regardless of charge, whereas the effects of the same reagents on oocytes expressing the
Y380C
construct were distinctly charge-dependent.
Login to comment
484
ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys 11585852:484:88
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys details
The anionic reagent (MTSES) increased the macroscopic conductance of oocytes expressing
Y380C
and altered the shape of the I-V plot from outwardly rectifying to nearly linear, whereas cationic reagents (MTSET and MTSEA) reduced the conductance and enhanced the rectification, exactly as predicted for a residue that resides near the mouth of a cation-selective pore.
Login to comment
485
ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys
X
ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys 11585852:485:86
status:
NEW
view ABCC7 p.Tyr380Cys details
Single-channel records disclosed that MTS reagents altered the unitary conductance of
Y380C
channels as would be predicted from macroscopic records, but did not affect channel gating.
Login to comment