ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Arg1443His

ClinVar:	c.4328G>A , p.Arg1443His ? , not provided
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (71%), C: D (71%), D: D (71%), E: D (71%), F: D (75%), G: D (71%), H: D (85%), I: D (71%), K: N (57%), L: D (71%), M: D (71%), N: D (53%), P: D (75%), Q: D (59%), S: D (59%), T: D (53%), V: D (71%), W: D (85%), Y: D (66%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: N, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: N, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Correlation between photoreceptor layer integrity ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 3;53(8):4409-15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8201. Print 2012 Jul. Testa F, Rossi S, Sodi A, Passerini I, Di Iorio V, Della Corte M, Banfi S, Surace EM, Menchini U, Auricchio A, Simonelli F
Correlation between photoreceptor layer integrity and visual function in patients with Stargardt disease: implications for gene therapy.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 3;53(8):4409-15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8201. Print 2012 Jul., [PMID:22661472]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To perform a clinical characterization of Stargardt patients with ABCA4 gene mutation, and to investigate the correlation between the inner and outer segment (IS/OS) junction morphology and visual acuity, fundus lesions, electroretinogram abnormalities, and macular sensitivity. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with Stargardt disease (STGD) were given a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. Inner-outer photoreceptor junction morphology evaluated by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was correlated with visual acuity, fundus lesions, fundus autofluorescence, full-field and multifocal electroretinography responses, and microperimetric macular sensitivities. We classified STGD patients into three groups: (1) IS/OS junction disorganization in the fovea, (2) IS/OS junction loss in the fovea, and (3) extensive loss of IS/OS junction. Mutation analysis of the ABCA4 gene was carried out by sequencing the complete coding region. RESULTS: A significant difference in visual acuity was observed between IS/OS groups 1 and 2 and between IS/OS groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.0001). A significant difference in microperimetry sensitivity was observed between IS/OS groups 2 and 3, and between IS/OS groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.0001). There was also a statistically significant correlation between IS/OS abnormalities and the extent of fundus lesions (Spearman P </= 0.01), as well as with the type of ERG and multifocal ERG results (Spearman P </= 0.01). Finally, the degree of IS/OS junction preservation showed a statistically significant correlation with the extension of foveal abnormalities assessed by fundus autofluorescence imaging (Spearman P </= 0.01). The G1961E mutation was more frequent in the patients without extensive loss of IS/OS junction (P = 0.01) confirming its association with a milder STGD phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a comprehensive approach in the examination of Stargardt patients has the potential to improve the understanding of vision loss and may provide a sensitive measure to evaluate the efficacy of future experimental therapies in patients with STGD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
66 Clinical and Molecular Data of STGD Patients Patient ID/Fam Age (y) Visual Acuity OCT ft (lm) MP (dB) IS/OS* Fundus† FAF‡ ERG§ mfERGjj Mutation 1 Mutation 2 4/2 50 0.0715 134 5.25 - 1 - 2 4 G1961E 250InsCAAA 5/2 47 0.1 127 14.2 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E 250InsCAAA 6/3 33 0.05 125 9.8 2 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2149X 7/4 18 0.085 135 0 - 2 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 8/5 16 0.095 104 0.9 3 2 3 3 4 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 9/6 71 0.03 109 0 3 3 3 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 11/7 46 0.2 137 9.35 2 1 2 1 1 Y850K A1598D 13/8 35 0.017 163 0 - 3 - 3 4 L541P R1098C 15/10 20 0.1 135.5 11.05 2 1 1 1 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 16/11 20 0.47 96 16.7 2 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 17/11 34 0.1 114.5 7.55 2 1 2 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 18/11 18 1 134 16.15 1 1 1 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 19/12 12 0.12 242 6.5 3 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 20/13 28 0.1 111 14.2 2 2 2 1 3 R1443H IVS35þ2t > c 21/14 34 0.2 152 14.15 2 1 2 2 4 R653C G1961E 22/15 69 0.079 122 0 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T R2149X 23/15 46 0.55 162 1.05 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T IVS45þ1g > c 25/16 28 0.11 105.5 3.1 3 2 2 3 4 R212C R212C 26/17 13 0.084 138.5 0.2 3 2 3 1 3 R18W C1490Y 27/4 20 0.0775 131 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 28/4 23 0.042 159.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 30/18 29 0.0375 103 0 3 3 3 3 4 N965S G1961E 31/19 17 0.1 102 9 3 2 2 3 4 L541P F655C 38/20 20 0.225 95 16 2 1 1 3 4 L541P G1961E 39/21 20 0.17 146 16.7 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E R2030X 42/22 43 0.575 127 7.05 2 1 2 1 2 250insCAAA G1961E 43/23 12 0.1 117.5 11.55 2 2 2 1 3 IVS40þ5g > a IVS15-8g > a 44/24 29 0.1 149 18.5 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E 4736del6bpins2bp 46/25 38 0.0075 182.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 G618R G1972R 48/26 35 0.46 133.5 12.25 2 1 - 1 3 4538insC G1961E 50/27 13 0.2 122.5 17.35 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 51/28 24 0.065 123 0 3 3 3 3 4 250InsCAAA V767D 52/29 14 1 147 6.15 1 1 1 3 4 L2027F A1881V 53/30 45 0.1 120 6.05 3 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2030X 54/30 24 0.09 159 2.65 3 3 3 3 4 V767D R2030X 55/31 34 0.085 150 5.15 3 3 3 3 4 N96H IVS40þ5g > a 56/32 48 0.0335 118.5 4.4 - 3 - 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 58/32 52 0.05 124 5.8 3 2 2 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 60/33 43 0.065 163 15.95 2 1 - 1 2 250InsCAAA G1961E 61/34 45 0.03 187.5 4.5 1 1 1 2 1 R1640Q G1961E 64/35 33 0.0665 158 0 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 65/35 38 0.008 172 0.05 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 66/36 42 0.4 137 0.95 3 2 2 1 3 N96D IVS40þ5g > a 67/37 14 0.235 132 0.15 3 2 3 3 4 IVS6-2a > t IVS6-2a > t 69/38 19 0.09 120 0 3 1 2 1 3 R511H N529S 70/39 42 0.515 140 0.4 3 3 3 3 4 IVS40þ5g > a N965S 72/40 33 0.096 116.5 5.1 3 2 2 1 3 N96D L2140Q 73/41 17 0.1 160 14.35 2 2 2 3 4 G690D A1598D 74/42 36 0.0125 142.5 0 3 3 3 3 4 N96H N96H 75/43 45 0.2 214.5 11.7 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 77/44 19 0.34 137.5 11.75 2 1 - 1 3 G1961E G618R 81/45 66 0.335 163 2 - 3 - 2 4 N96D G1961E 82/46 41 0.1 116.5 0.15 3 3 3 3 4 4538insC IVS40þ5g > a 83/47 17 0.395 165 19.25 1 1 1 1 2 G1961E IVS45þ1g > c 84/47 26 0.135 120 16.2 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E IVS45þ1g > c 85/48 10 0.16 149.5 12.4 2 2 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c IVS40þ5g > a 87/40 25 0.9 155 15 2 1 2 1 2 N96D L2140Q 88/49 32 0.0715 144 0.1 - 3 - 3 4 IVS45þ1g > c R2149X 89/50 14 0.1185 147 1.85 3 1 - 3 4 P402A 250insCAAA 90/51 35 0.07 116.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 A1598D R2030X 94/52 30 0.1 144 12.85 2 1 - 1 1 A1598D G1961E Fam, family; OCT ft, optical coherence tomography foveal thickness; MP, microperimetry; IS/OS, inner-outer segment junction; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; ERG, electroretinogram; mfERG, multifocal-electroretinogram. Login to comment
67 Clinical and Molecular Data of STGD Patients Patient ID/Fam Age (y) Visual Acuity OCT ft (lm) MP (dB) IS/OS* Fundusߤ FAFߥ ERG&#a7; mfERGjj Mutation 1 Mutation 2 4/2 50 0.0715 134 5.25 - 1 - 2 4 G1961E 250InsCAAA 5/2 47 0.1 127 14.2 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E 250InsCAAA 6/3 33 0.05 125 9.8 2 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2149X 7/4 18 0.085 135 0 - 2 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 8/5 16 0.095 104 0.9 3 2 3 3 4 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 9/6 71 0.03 109 0 3 3 3 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 11/7 46 0.2 137 9.35 2 1 2 1 1 Y850K A1598D 13/8 35 0.017 163 0 - 3 - 3 4 L541P R1098C 15/10 20 0.1 135.5 11.05 2 1 1 1 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 16/11 20 0.47 96 16.7 2 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 17/11 34 0.1 114.5 7.55 2 1 2 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 18/11 18 1 134 16.15 1 1 1 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 19/12 12 0.12 242 6.5 3 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 20/13 28 0.1 111 14.2 2 2 2 1 3 R1443H IVS35&#fe;2t > c 21/14 34 0.2 152 14.15 2 1 2 2 4 R653C G1961E 22/15 69 0.079 122 0 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T R2149X 23/15 46 0.55 162 1.05 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T IVS45&#fe;1g > c 25/16 28 0.11 105.5 3.1 3 2 2 3 4 R212C R212C 26/17 13 0.084 138.5 0.2 3 2 3 1 3 R18W C1490Y 27/4 20 0.0775 131 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 28/4 23 0.042 159.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 30/18 29 0.0375 103 0 3 3 3 3 4 N965S G1961E 31/19 17 0.1 102 9 3 2 2 3 4 L541P F655C 38/20 20 0.225 95 16 2 1 1 3 4 L541P G1961E 39/21 20 0.17 146 16.7 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E R2030X 42/22 43 0.575 127 7.05 2 1 2 1 2 250insCAAA G1961E 43/23 12 0.1 117.5 11.55 2 2 2 1 3 IVS40&#fe;5g > a IVS15-8g > a 44/24 29 0.1 149 18.5 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E 4736del6bpins2bp 46/25 38 0.0075 182.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 G618R G1972R 48/26 35 0.46 133.5 12.25 2 1 - 1 3 4538insC G1961E 50/27 13 0.2 122.5 17.35 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 51/28 24 0.065 123 0 3 3 3 3 4 250InsCAAA V767D 52/29 14 1 147 6.15 1 1 1 3 4 L2027F A1881V 53/30 45 0.1 120 6.05 3 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2030X 54/30 24 0.09 159 2.65 3 3 3 3 4 V767D R2030X 55/31 34 0.085 150 5.15 3 3 3 3 4 N96H IVS40&#fe;5g > a 56/32 48 0.0335 118.5 4.4 - 3 - 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 58/32 52 0.05 124 5.8 3 2 2 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 60/33 43 0.065 163 15.95 2 1 - 1 2 250InsCAAA G1961E 61/34 45 0.03 187.5 4.5 1 1 1 2 1 R1640Q G1961E 64/35 33 0.0665 158 0 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 65/35 38 0.008 172 0.05 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 66/36 42 0.4 137 0.95 3 2 2 1 3 N96D IVS40&#fe;5g > a 67/37 14 0.235 132 0.15 3 2 3 3 4 IVS6-2a > t IVS6-2a > t 69/38 19 0.09 120 0 3 1 2 1 3 R511H N529S 70/39 42 0.515 140 0.4 3 3 3 3 4 IVS40&#fe;5g > a N965S 72/40 33 0.096 116.5 5.1 3 2 2 1 3 N96D L2140Q 73/41 17 0.1 160 14.35 2 2 2 3 4 G690D A1598D 74/42 36 0.0125 142.5 0 3 3 3 3 4 N96H N96H 75/43 45 0.2 214.5 11.7 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 77/44 19 0.34 137.5 11.75 2 1 - 1 3 G1961E G618R 81/45 66 0.335 163 2 - 3 - 2 4 N96D G1961E 82/46 41 0.1 116.5 0.15 3 3 3 3 4 4538insC IVS40&#fe;5g > a 83/47 17 0.395 165 19.25 1 1 1 1 2 G1961E IVS45&#fe;1g > c 84/47 26 0.135 120 16.2 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E IVS45&#fe;1g > c 85/48 10 0.16 149.5 12.4 2 2 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c IVS40&#fe;5g > a 87/40 25 0.9 155 15 2 1 2 1 2 N96D L2140Q 88/49 32 0.0715 144 0.1 - 3 - 3 4 IVS45&#fe;1g > c R2149X 89/50 14 0.1185 147 1.85 3 1 - 3 4 P402A 250insCAAA 90/51 35 0.07 116.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 A1598D R2030X 94/52 30 0.1 144 12.85 2 1 - 1 1 A1598D G1961E Fam, family; OCT ft, optical coherence tomography foveal thickness; MP, microperimetry; IS/OS, inner-outer segment junction; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; ERG, electroretinogram; mfERG, multifocal-electroretinogram. Statistics Our set of data is described by continuous (BCVA, OCT foveal thickness, and macular sensitivities) and categorical (fundus, FAF, IS/ OS, ERG, and mfERG groups) variables. Login to comment

[hide] Stargardt macular dystrophy: common ABCA4 mutation... Mol Vis. 2012;18:280-9. Epub 2012 Feb 1. Roberts LJ, Nossek CA, Greenberg LJ, Ramesar RS
Stargardt macular dystrophy: common ABCA4 mutations in South Africa--establishment of a rapid genetic test and relating risk to patients.
Mol Vis. 2012;18:280-9. Epub 2012 Feb 1., [PMID:22328824]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Based on the previous indications of founder ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 4 gene (ABCA4) mutations in a South African subpopulation, the purpose was to devise a mechanism for identifying common disease-causing mutations in subjects with ABCA4-associated retinopathies (AARs). Facilitating patient access to this data and determining the frequencies of the mutations in the South African population would enhance the current molecular diagnostic service offered. METHODS: The majority of subjects in this study were of Caucasian ancestry and affected with Stargardt macular dystrophy. The initial cohort consisted of DNA samples from 181 patients, and was screened using the ABCR400 chip. An assay was then designed to screen a secondary cohort of 72 patients for seven of the most commonly occurring ABCA4 mutations in this population. A total of 269 control individuals were also screened for the seven ABCA4 mutations. RESULTS: Microarray screening results from a cohort of 181 patients affected with AARs revealed that seven ABCA4 mutations (p.Arg152*, c.768G>T, p.Arg602Trp, p.Gly863Ala, p.Cys1490Tyr, c.5461-10T>C, and p.Leu2027Phe) occurred at a relatively high frequency. The newly designed genetic assay identified two of the seven disease-associated mutations in 28/72 patients in a secondary patient cohort. In the control cohort, 12/269 individuals were found to be heterozygotes, resulting in an estimated background frequency of these mutations in this particular population of 4.46 per 100 individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively high detection rate of seven ABCA4 mutations in the primary patient cohort led to the design and subsequent utility of a multiplex assay. This assay can be used as a viable screening tool and to reduce costs and laboratory time. The estimated background frequency of the seven ABCA4 mutations, together with the improved diagnostic service, could be used by counselors to facilitate clinical and genetic management of South African families with AARs.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
139 of alleles detected Frequency p.Cys54Tyr c. 161 G>A 2 0.55% p.Arg152* c. 454 C>T 12 3.31% p.Arg152Gln c. 455 G>A 3 0.83% p.Gly172Ser c. 514 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg212Cys c. 634 C>T 1 0.28% p.Lys223Gln c. 667 A>C 1 0.28% p.V256V (Splice) c. 768 G>T 18 4.97% p.Pro291Leu c. 872 C>T 1 0.28% p.Trp439* c. 1317 G>A 1 0.28% p.Ala538Asp c. 1613 C>A 1 0.28% p.Leu541Pro c. 1622 T>C 1 0.28% p.Arg602Trp c. 1885C>T 30 8.29% p.Val643Met c. 1927 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg653Cys c. 1957 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg681* c. 2041 C>T 3 0.83% p.Val767Asp c. 2300 T>A 1 0.28% p.Trp855* c.2564_2571delGGTACCTT 2 0.55% p.Gly863Ala c. 2588 G>C 11 3.04% p.Val931Met c. 2791 G>A 1 0.28% p.Asn965Ser c. 2894 A>G 4 1.10% p.Val989Ala c. 2966 T>C 1 0.28% p.Gly991Arg c. 2971 G>C 1 0.28% p.Thr1019Met c. 3056 C>T 1 0.28% p.Ala1038Val c. 3113 C>T 3 0.83% p.Glu1087Lys c. 3259 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg1108Cys c. 3322 C>T 2 0.55% p.Leu1201Arg c. 3602 T>G 4 1.10% p.Arg1300Gln c. 3899 G>A 4 1.10% p.Pro1380Leu c. 4139 C>T 3 0.83% p.Trp1408Arg c. 4222 T>C 1 0.28% - c. 4253+5G>A 1 0.28% p.Phe1440Ser c. 4319 T>C 1 0.28% p.Arg1443His c. 4328 G>A 1 0.28% p.Cys1490Tyr c.4469 G>A 54 14.92% p.Gln1513Pro fs*42 c. 4535 insC 1 0.28% p.Ala1598Asp c. 4793C>A 1 0.28% p.Arg1640Trp c. 4918 C>T 2 0.55% p.Ser1642Arg c. 4926 C>G 1 0.28% p.V1681_C1685del c. 5041 del15 1 0.28% - c. 5461-10T>C 24 6.63% - c. 5714+5 G>A 2 0.55% p.Pro1948Leu c. 5843 C>T 1 0.28% p.Gly1961Glu c. 5882 G>A 4 1.10% p.Leu2027Phe c.6079 C>T 30 8.29% p.Arg2030* c. 6088 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg2030Gln c. 6089 G>A 3 0.83% p.Arg2038Trp c. 6112 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg2107His c. 6320 G>A 2 0.55% p.Arg2118Glu fs*27 c. 6352 delA 1 0.28% p.Cys2150Tyr c. 6449 G>A 1 0.28% p.Gln2220* c. 6658 C>T 1 0.28% p.Gly863Ala mutation, which appears to have a founder effect in the Netherlands [13,15], the results obtained from the current study are in agreement with September et al.`s conclusions [9]. Login to comment

[hide] Interaction of extracellular domain 2 of the human... J Biol Chem. 2010 Jun 18;285(25):19372-83. Epub 2010 Apr 19. Biswas-Fiss EE, Kurpad DS, Joshi K, Biswas SB
Interaction of extracellular domain 2 of the human retina-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCA4) with all-trans-retinal.
J Biol Chem. 2010 Jun 18;285(25):19372-83. Epub 2010 Apr 19., [PMID:20404325]

Abstract [show]
The retina-specific ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, ABCA4, is essential for transport of all-trans-retinal from the rod outer segment discs in the retina and is associated with a broad range of inherited retinal diseases, including Stargardt disease, autosomal recessive cone rod dystrophy, and fundus flavimaculatus. A unique feature of the ABCA subfamily of ABC transporters is the presence of highly conserved, long extracellular loops or domains (ECDs) with unknown function. The high degree of sequence conservation and mapped disease-associated mutations in these domains suggests an important physiological significance. Conformational analysis using CD spectroscopy of purified, recombinant ECD2 protein demonstrated that it has an ordered and stable structure composed of 27 +/- 3% alpha-helix, 20 +/- 3% beta-pleated sheet, and 53 +/- 3% coil. Significant conformational changes were observed in disease-associated mutant proteins. Using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence emission spectrum of ECD2 polypeptide and fluorescence anisotropy, we have demonstrated that this domain specifically interacts with all-trans-retinal. Furthermore, the retinal interaction appeared preferential for the all-trans-isomer and was directly measurable through fluorescence anisotropy analysis. Our results demonstrate that the three macular degeneration-associated mutations lead to significant changes in the secondary structure of the ECD2 domain of ABCA4, as well as in its interaction with all-trans-retinal.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
112 Three ABCA4 mutations associated with Stargardt disease, W1408L, R1443H, and C1488R, were chosen for analysis in this study. Login to comment
133 We have analyzed changes in the conformation of ECD2 protein harboring disease-associated mutations W1408L, C1488R, and R1443H. Login to comment
161 TABLE 1 Stargardt disease-associated mutations occurring in the ECD2 domain investigated in this study Mutation Base change Mutagenesis primer R1443H CGC4328CAC 5Ј-CAGGCTTTGGCAACCACTGAAGGAAGGGTGGCTTC-3Ј W1408L TGG4221TTG 5Ј-ACCCTTCACCCCTTGATATGGGCAGCAGTACACCTTC-3Ј C1488R TGC4462CGC 5Ј-AACCCTTCACCATCCCGCAGGTGCAGCACCAGGGAGAAG-3Ј Second Extracellular Domain of ABCA4 19376 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOLUME 285•NUMBER 25•JUNE 18, wtECD2, indicated by a Tm of 57.1 °C (Table 3). Login to comment
171 R1443H Mutation-The R1443H mutation has been identified in individuals with Stargardt disease and appears to occur in those with Northern European as well as East Indian ancestry (23, 51). Login to comment
174 Major shifts in the CD spectral minima at 208 and 220 nm for R1443H were observed at 25 °C, consistent with a helix-coil transition concomitant with a significant change of overall secondary structure (Fig. 5). Login to comment
176 Comparing the spectra of the native and heat-denatured states of the R1443H mutant, it appears that the heat-induced alterations of the secondary structure elements over the temperature range of 20-80 °C were small. Login to comment
177 It is likely that the absence of a sequential loss of structure with temperature may simply reflect the lack of ␣-helical structure of R1443H relative to wtECD2. Login to comment
205 A, wild type ECD2 ; inset, ellipticity at 220 nm was monitored over the range of 20-80 °C, and the Tm was determined from the inflection points of data fitted to sigmoidal curve; B, W1408L; C, C1488R, and D, R1443H. Login to comment
209 With both W1408L and C1488R, attenuation of tryptophan fluorescence emission was observed with increasing concentrations of all-trans-retinal (Fig. 7, B and C), albeit significantly diminished compared with that observed with the wild type ECD2 (Fig. 7A). Login to comment
210 On the other hand, mutant R1443H displayed little change in tryptophan fluorescence spectra in the presence FIGURE 7. Login to comment
217 ✸, ECD2 WT; , R1443H; Ⅺ, W1408L; ᭛, C1488R. Login to comment
251 Influence of Stargardt Disease-associated Mutations on ECD2 Domain Secondary Structure-Of the three mutants examined here, the R1443H mutation appeared to be the most severe in FIGURE 10. Login to comment
297 In the case of mutant R1443H, a large decrease in the binding affinity was observed, with a Ͼ250-fold increase in Kd (Fig. 8 and Table 3). Login to comment
298 Less dramatic changes were seen with the other mutants investigated in this study, with a 5-8-fold increase in Kd for W1408L and C1488R, respectively. Login to comment
299 With mutant R1443H, the apparent lack of interaction with all-trans-retinal was observed. Login to comment
302 The conformation of R1443H was strik- Second Extracellular Domain of ABCA4 JUNE 18, 2010•VOLUME 285•NUMBER JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 19381 ingly different from that of wtECD2 and appeared refractory to changes in temperature. Login to comment
160 TABLE 1 Stargardt disease-associated mutations occurring in the ECD2 domain investigated in this study Mutation Base change Mutagenesis primer R1443H CGC4328CAC 5b18;-CAGGCTTTGGCAACCACTGAAGGAAGGGTGGCTTC-3b18; W1408L TGG4221TTG 5b18;-ACCCTTCACCCCTTGATATGGGCAGCAGTACACCTTC-3b18; C1488R TGC4462CGC 5b18;-AACCCTTCACCATCCCGCAGGTGCAGCACCAGGGAGAAG-3b18; Second Extracellular Domain of ABCA4 19376 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOLUME 285ߦNUMBER 25ߦJUNE 18, 2010 wtECD2, indicated by a Tm of 57.1 &#b0;C (Table 3). Login to comment
170 R1443H Mutation-The R1443H mutation has been identified in individuals with Stargardt disease and appears to occur in those with Northern European as well as East Indian ancestry (23, 51). Login to comment
173 Major shifts in the CD spectral minima at 208 and 220 nm for R1443H were observed at 25 &#b0;C, consistent with a helix-coil transition concomitant with a significant change of overall secondary structure (Fig. 5). Login to comment
175 Comparing the spectra of the native and heat-denatured states of the R1443H mutant, it appears that the heat-induced alterations of the secondary structure elements over the temperature range of 20-80 &#b0;C were small. Login to comment
204 A, wild type ECD2 ; inset, ellipticity at 220 nm was monitored over the range of 20-80 &#b0;C, and the Tm was determined from the inflection points of data fitted to sigmoidal curve; B, W1408L; C, C1488R, and D, R1443H. Login to comment
216 લ, ECD2 WT; , R1443H; ǧa;, W1408L; ƪb;, C1488R. Login to comment
250 Influence of Stargardt Disease-associated Mutations on ECD2 Domain Secondary Structure-Of the three mutants examined here, the R1443H mutation appeared to be the most severe in FIGURE 10. Login to comment
296 In the case of mutant R1443H, a large decrease in the binding affinity was observed, with a b0e;250-fold increase in Kd (Fig. 8 and Table 3). Login to comment
301 The conformation of R1443H was strik- Second Extracellular Domain of ABCA4 JUNE 18, 2010ߦVOLUME 285ߦNUMBER 25 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 19381 at SEMMELWEIS UNIV OF MEDICINE on December , ingly different from that of wtECD2 and appeared refractory to changes in temperature. Login to comment

[hide] Mutation spectrum and founder chromosomes for the ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;45(6):1705-11. September AV, Vorster AA, Ramesar RS, Greenberg LJ
Mutation spectrum and founder chromosomes for the ABCA4 gene in South African patients with Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;45(6):1705-11., [PMID:15161829]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess the mutation spectrum of ABCA4 underlying Stargardt disease (STGD) in South Africa (SA) and to determine whether there is a single or a few founder chromosomes in SA STGD families. METHODS: Sixty-four probands exhibiting the STGD phenotype were screened for mutations in the 50 exons of ABCA4 by single-strand conformational polymorphism-heteroduplex analysis sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Microsatellite marker haplotyping was used to determine the ancestry in 10 families. RESULTS: Fifty-seven ABCA4 disease-associated alleles were identified that comprised 16 different sequence variants, of which two were novel, in 40 individuals of the cohort of 64 subjects. The most common variants identified included the C1490Y, L2027F, R602W, V256splice, R152X, and 2588G-->C mutations. The C1490Y variant was the most common disease-associated variant identified (19/64 subjects) and was absent in 392 control chromosomes. At least 10 ABCA4 disease-associated haplotypes were identified. Two of these haplotypes, which carried the C1490Y mutation, were identified in three unrelated families. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that ABCA4 is the major gene underlying STGD in the cohort investigated. Five of the six common sequence variants identified were at a higher frequency in the SA cohort than reported in published data on individuals of similar ancestry. The mutation and haplotype data suggests that there are several ancestral haplotypes underlying STGD in SA. There seems to be at least two different origins for the common C1490Y mutation, as well as two for the R602W mutation, thereby suggesting several founder effects for STGD in SA.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
71 List of 16 Different Potential Disease-Associated Sequence Variants Identified in 64 SA Subjects with arSTGD Nucleotide Change Amino Acid Change Families (N ‫؍‬ 64) Exon Reference C454T R152X 4 5 3,33 G455A R152Q 1 5 35 C634T R212C 1 6 16,27 G768T (Splice donor) V256splice 5 6 15 C1885T R602W 6 13 9 2588G3C G863A 4 17 8 T3047C V989A 1 20 11 T4319C F1440S 1 29 9 G4328A* R1443H 1 29 This study G4469A C1490Y 19 30 15,9 G5077A V16931 1 36 36 C6079T L2027F 8 44 8 C6088A R2030X 1 44 9,37 C6112T R2038W 2 44 5 IVS45ϩ7G3A Splice donor 1 45 26 6352⌬A* Frameshift 1 46 This study No individuals positive for the R1443H variant were identified in 47 control individuals of Indian ancestry. Login to comment
76 The remaining two disease-associated variants, R1443H and 6352⌬A (nucleotide position), have not been previously reported. Login to comment
77 The R1443H variant was identified in a sporadic individual of Asian-Indian ancestry and was not observed in 47 unaffected, unrelated, ethnically matched control subjects. Login to comment
85 The novel sequence variant R1443H was associated with a late AO of 31 years (individual 372.1). Login to comment
132 Finally, variants R1443H and 6352⌬A identified in this SA study, had not been reported previously. Login to comment
148 It has previously been hypothesized that two null mutations cause atypical RP and combinations of a null and a moderately severe mutation cause CRD.15 The novel R1443H involves a substitution of a conserved arginine residue with histidine, another basic amino acid, at position 1443 within extracellular domain 2 (ECD 2) of the ABCA4 protein.34 It is therefore predicted that R1443H does not have a dramatic functional effect within the intradiscal space of the photoreceptor cells where ECD-2 is localized. Login to comment
150 It has been suggested that mutations toward the 3Ј end of the gene may not have a significant effect on protein function and hence can be more often associated with milder phenotypes (referring specifically to AO).34 The novel R1443H and R2030X sequence variants, located toward the 3Ј end of the gene may therefore explain the milder phenotype (AO ϭ 31 years) observed in individual 372.1, who was heterozygous for these mutations. Login to comment
155 This therefore suggests that the two novel mutations 6352⌬A and R1443H may have moderate and mild effects on ABCA4 protein function, respectively. Login to comment

[hide] Genotyping microarray (gene chip) for the ABCR (AB... Hum Mutat. 2003 Nov;22(5):395-403. Jaakson K, Zernant J, Kulm M, Hutchinson A, Tonisson N, Glavac D, Ravnik-Glavac M, Hawlina M, Meltzer MR, Caruso RC, Testa F, Maugeri A, Hoyng CB, Gouras P, Simonelli F, Lewis RA, Lupski JR, Cremers FP, Allikmets R
Genotyping microarray (gene chip) for the ABCR (ABCA4) gene.
Hum Mutat. 2003 Nov;22(5):395-403., [PMID:14517951]

Abstract [show]
Genetic variation in the ABCR (ABCA4) gene has been associated with five distinct retinal phenotypes, including Stargardt disease/fundus flavimaculatus (STGD/FFM), cone-rod dystrophy (CRD), and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Comparative genetic analyses of ABCR variation and diagnostics have been complicated by substantial allelic heterogeneity and by differences in screening methods. To overcome these limitations, we designed a genotyping microarray (gene chip) for ABCR that includes all approximately 400 disease-associated and other variants currently described, enabling simultaneous detection of all known ABCR variants. The ABCR genotyping microarray (the ABCR400 chip) was constructed by the arrayed primer extension (APEX) technology. Each sequence change in ABCR was included on the chip by synthesis and application of sequence-specific oligonucleotides. We validated the chip by screening 136 confirmed STGD patients and 96 healthy controls, each of whom we had analyzed previously by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technology and/or heteroduplex analysis. The microarray was >98% effective in determining the existing genetic variation and was comparable to direct sequencing in that it yielded many sequence changes undetected by SSCP. In STGD patient cohorts, the efficiency of the array to detect disease-associated alleles was between 54% and 78%, depending on the ethnic composition and degree of clinical and molecular characterization of a cohort. In addition, chip analysis suggested a high carrier frequency (up to 1:10) of ABCR variants in the general population. The ABCR genotyping microarray is a robust, cost-effective, and comprehensive screening tool for variation in one gene in which mutations are responsible for a substantial fraction of retinal disease. The ABCR chip is a prototype for the next generation of screening and diagnostic tools in ophthalmic genetics, bridging clinical and scientific research.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
115 Mutations Detected in theTwoTest Populations by the ABCR400 Array,That Had Not Been Found by SSCP Number Nucleotide change Protein e¡ect Number of cases 1 161G4A C54Y 3 2 194G4A G65E 1 3 428C4T P143L 1 4 455G4A R152Q 1 5 514G4A G172S 1 6 635G4A R212H 1 7 656G4C R219T 1 8 768G4Ta Splice/V256V 3 9 1007C4G S336C 2 10 1268A4G H423R 4 11 1411G4A E471K 2 12 1622T4Ca L541P 8 13 1933G4A D645N 1 14 2041C4T R681X 5 15 2090G4A W697X 1 16 2471T4C I824T 1 17 2588G4Ca Splice/G863A 5 18 2828G4A R943Q 1 19 2966T4C V989A 1 20 2971G4C G991R 1 21 4139C4T P1380L 8 22 4195G4A E1399K 1 23 4328G4A R1443H 1 24 4457C4T P1486L 1 25 4462T4Ca C1488R 1 26 4469G4Aa C1490Y 1 27 4918C4Ta R1640W 2 28 IVS40+5G4A Splice 2 29 5537T4C I1846T 2 30 5882G4A G1961E 5 31 6089G4A R2030Q 1 32 6104T4C L2035P 1 33 6449G4A C2150Y 1 Mutation numbering is based on the cDNA sequence (GenBank NM_000350). Login to comment

[hide] A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in th... Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct;67(4):800-13. Epub 2000 Aug 24. Rivera A, White K, Stohr H, Steiner K, Hemmrich N, Grimm T, Jurklies B, Lorenz B, Scholl HP, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Weber BH
A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene in Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct;67(4):800-13. Epub 2000 Aug 24., [PMID:10958763]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease (STGD) is a common autosomal recessive maculopathy of early and young-adult onset and is caused by alterations in the gene encoding the photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter (ABCA4). We have studied 144 patients with STGD and 220 unaffected individuals ascertained from the German population, to complete a comprehensive, population-specific survey of the sequence variation in the ABCA4 gene. In addition, we have assessed the proposed role for ABCA4 in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a common cause of late-onset blindness, by studying 200 affected individuals with late-stage disease. Using a screening strategy based primarily on denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, we have identified in the three study groups a total of 127 unique alterations, of which 90 have not been previously reported, and have classified 72 as probable pathogenic mutations. Of the 288 STGD chromosomes studied, mutations were identified in 166, resulting in a detection rate of approximately 58%. Eight different alleles account for 61% of the identified disease alleles, and at least one of these, the L541P-A1038V complex allele, appears to be a founder mutation in the German population. When the group with AMD and the control group were analyzed with the same methodology, 18 patients with AMD and 12 controls were found to harbor possible disease-associated alterations. This represents no significant difference between the two groups; however, for detection of modest effects of rare alleles in complex diseases, the analysis of larger cohorts of patients may be required.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
80 Nucleotide alterations occurring in sim- Table 2 ABCA4 Mutations Found in Patients with STGD and AMD and in Controls EXON AND NUCLEOTIDE CHANGE EFFECT NO. OF ALLELES REFERENCE(S) STGD (288) AMD (400) Control (440) 3: 178GrA A60T 1 0 0 This study 179CrT A60E 1 0 0 This study 194GrA G65E 1 0 0 Fishman et al. (1999) 203CrT P68L 1 0 0 This study 214GrA G72R 1 0 0 This study 296insA Frameshift 2 0 0 This study 5: 454CrT R152X 1 0 0 This study 6: 634CrT R212C 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 688TrA C230S 1 0 0 This study 730delCT Frameshift 1 0 0 This study 740ArG N247S 1 0 0 This study 768GrT Splice 2 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 8: 983ArT E328V 1a 0 0 This study 1086TrA Y362X 1 0 0 This study 10: 1317GrA W438X 1 0 0 This study 11: 1411GrA E471K 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 12: 1622TrC L541P 21a 1a 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 1715GrA R572Q 1a 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 13: 1819GrA G607R 1 0 0 This study 1903CrA Q635K 2a 0 0 This study 1903CrT Q635X 1 0 0 This study IVS13ϩ1GrA Splice 2 0 0 This study 14: 1957CrT R653C 1 0 0 This study 1988GrA W663X 1 0 0 This study 2041CrT R681X 4 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 15: 2291GrA C764Y 1 0 0 This study 2292delT Frameshift 1a 0 0 This study 2295TrG S765R 1a 0 0 This study 16: 2564GrA W855X 1 0 0 Nasonkin et al. (1998) 17: 2588GrC Spliceb 17a 6 5 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Cremers et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999), Papaioannou et al. (2000) 18: 2701ArG T901A 0 2 0 This study 2741ArG H914A 0 0 1 This study 19: 2876CrT T959I 1 0 0 This study 20: IVS20ϩ5GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 21: 3106GrA E1036K 1a 0 0 Nasonkin et al. (1998) 3113CrT A1038V 26a 4a 1 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Cremers et al. (1998), Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) T3187TrC S1063P 1 0 0 This study (Continued) 805 Table 2 Continued EXON AND NUCLEOTIDE CHANGE EFFECT NO. OF ALLELES REFERENCE(S) STGD (288) AMD (400) Control (440) 22: 3292CrT R1097C 1 0 0 This study 3322CrT R1108C 4 0 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999) 24: 3528insTGCA Frameshift 1 0 0 This study 25: 3808GrT E1270X 1 0 0 This study 27: 3898CrT R1300X 1 0 0 This study 28: IVS28ϩ5GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 4139CrT P1380L 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 4195GrA E1399K 2 0 0 This study 4234CrT Q1412X 4 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 29: 4289TrC L1430P 2 0 0 This study 4318TrG F1440V 1 0 0 This study 4328GrA R1443H 1 0 0 This study 30: 4457CrT P1486L 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 4463GrA C1488Y 1 0 0 This study 31: 4610CrT T1537M 1 0 0 This study 35: IVS35ϩ2TrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 36: 5065TrC S1689P 1 0 0 This study 5114GrT R1705L 1 0 0 This study IVS36ϩ1GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 37: 5198TrC M1733T 0 0 1 This study 5242GrA G1748R 1 0 0 This study 5248CrT Q1750X 1 0 0 This study 5288TrC L1763P 1 0 0 This study 38: IVS38ϩ1GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 40: 5653GrA E1885K 1 0 0 This study 5693GrA R1898H 5 2 1 Allikmets et al. (1997b), Lewis et al. (1999) IVS40ϩ5GrA Splice 8a 0 0 Cremers et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 42: 5882GrA G1961E 34 4 2 Allikmets et al. (1997b), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 43: 5917delG Frameshift 3 0 0 This study 5923GrC G1975R 1 0 0 This study 5929GrA G1977S 1 0 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999) 45: 6229CrG R2077G 1 0 0 This study 6229CrT R2077W 1 0 0 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999) 48: 6609CrA Y2203X 2 0 0 This study 6647GrT A2216V 0 0 1 This study a Mutation pairs occurring on a single haplotype. Login to comment
111 Likewise, for the intron 28 alteration, a spliced product Table 5 Patients with STGD Who Have Two Identified Disease Alleles AGE AT ONSET AND PATIENT MUTATION SEGREGATION IN FAMILY a Allele 1 Allele 2 5-9 years: STGD17 Q1412X R2077W Yes STGD88 G65E G1961E NA STGD93 G1961E G1961E Yes STGD99 L541P-A1038V G1961E Yes STGD100 L541P-A1038V IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes STGD108 Y362X IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes STGD109 L541P-A1038V W855X Yes STGD139b 5917delG 5917delG Yes STGD167 C1488Y IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes 10-14 years: STGD21 R681X R1898H NA STGD37 L541P-A1038V L541P-A1038V Yes STGD47/164 IVS13ϩ1GrA 2588GrC Yes STGD50 2588GrC A1038V NA STGD70 2588GrC IVS40ϩ5GrA NA STGD82 L541P-A1038V S1063P Yes STGD87 2588GrC Q1750X Yes STGD98 R212C T959I Yes STGD102 R572Q-2588GrC IVS35ϩ2TrA Yes STGD107 C764Y 3528ins4 Yes STGD120 L1430P L1430P NA STGD121 R1300X IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes STGD156 R1108C G1961E NA STGD159 R1108C Q1412X Yes STGD171 L541P-A1038V G1961E NA 15-19 years: STGD34 G768T G1961E Yes STGD39 L541P-A1038V R1443H NA STGD40/163 2588GrC E1885K Yes STGD45 E1399K G1977S Yes STGD59 R1898H G1975R NA STGD67 P68L S1689P Yes STGD75 Q635K IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes STGD111 2292delT-S765R G1961E Yes STGD114 Y2203X G1961E Yes STGD138 IVS13ϩ1GA 2588GrC Yes 20-24 years: STGD41 R681X G1961E Yes STGD63 A60T R1898H NA STGD86 296insA G1961E Yes STGD91 L541P-A1038V A1038V NA STGD113 L541P-A1038V 2588GrC Yes STGD118b IVS20ϩ5GrA G1961E Yes STGD119 L541P-A1038V G1961E Yes STGD122 L541P-A1038V G1961E Yes STGD135 W663X G1961E NA STGD147 IVS36ϩ1GrA G1961E Yes STGD168 L541P-A1038V G1961E NA 25-29 years: STGD62 G607R G1961E NA STGD71 296insA A1038V Yes STGD78 2588GrC Q1412X Yes STGD103 2588GrC IVS20ϩ5GrA Yes STGD116 L541P-A1038V G1961E Yes STGD139bb G1961E 5917delG Yes у30 years: STGD38 E471K G1961E Yes STGD68 E1399K G1961E Yes STGD69 L541P-A1038V 2588GrC NA STGD95 F1440V G1748R Yes STGD134 C230S G1961E NA STGD144 2588GrC R1705L NA STGD148 R1097C Y2203X NA STGD170 L541P-A1038V 2588GrC NA a NA p not applicable. Login to comment

[hide] ABCA4 mutational spectrum in Mexican patients with... Exp Eye Res. 2013 Apr;109:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Feb 16. Chacon-Camacho OF, Granillo-Alvarez M, Ayala-Ramirez R, Zenteno JC
ABCA4 mutational spectrum in Mexican patients with Stargardt disease: Identification of 12 novel mutations and evidence of a founder effect for the common p.A1773V mutation.
Exp Eye Res. 2013 Apr;109:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Feb 16., [PMID:23419329]

Abstract [show]
The aim of this study was to assess the mutational spectrum of the ABCA4 gene in a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease from Mexico, a previously uncharacterized population. Clinical diagnosis in each patient was supported by a complete ophthalmological assessment that included visual acuity measurement, a slit lamp examination, a fundus examination and photography, electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, and computerized visual fields testing. Molecular analysis was performed by PCR amplification and direct nucleotide sequence of the 50 exons of the ABCA4 gene in genomic DNA. A total of 31 unrelated subjects with the disease were enrolled in the study. Molecular analysis in the total group of 62 alleles allowed the identification of 46 mutant ABCA4 alleles carrying 29 different pathogenic disease-associated mutations. Two ABCA4 mutant alleles were detected in 20 of the 31 patients (64.5%), a single disease allele was identified in six (19.4%), and no mutant alleles were detected in five of the cases (16.1%). Most patients with two ABCA4 mutations (11/20, 55%) were compound heterozygotes. Twelve variants were novel ABCA4 mutations. Nucleotide substitutions were the most frequent type of variation, occurring in 26 out of 29 (89.7%) different mutations. The two most common mutations in our study were the missense changes p.A1773V and p.G818E, which were identified in eight (17%) and seven (15%) of the total 46 disease-associated alleles, respectively. Haplotype analyses of intragenic SNPs in four subjects carrying the p.A1773V mutation supported a common origin for this mutation. In conclusion, this is the first report of ABCA4 molecular screening in Latin American Stargardt disease patients. Our results expand the mutational spectrum of the disease by adding 12 novel ABCA4 pathogenic variants and support the occurrence of a founder effect for the p.A1773V mutation in the Mexican population. The identification of recurrent mutations in our cohort will direct future ABCA4 molecular screening in patients from this ethnic group.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
100 Allele 1 Allele 2 Genotype Exon Nucleotide change Polypeptide change Exon Nucleotide change Polypeptide change Familial case # 1 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) Homozygous 2 e NI e e NI e e 3 6 c.634C>T p.R212C (D) 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) Compound heterozygous 4 23 c.3386G>T p.R1129L (D) 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L (D) Compound heterozygous 5 e NI e e NI e e 6 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) Homozygous 7 e NI e e NI e e 8 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) 28 c.4249_4251 delTTC p.F1417del (D; N) Compound heterozygous 9 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) Homozygous Sporadic case # 1 8 c.868C>T p.R290W (D) e IVS8&#fe;1G>A Splicing (D; N) Compound heterozygous 2 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) - NI - Heterozygous 3 20 c.3041T>G p.L1014R (D) 1; 49 c.52C>T; c.6764G>T p.R18W (D); p.S2255I (B) Compound heterozygous 4 13; 19 c.1804C>T; c.2828G>A p.R602W (D); p.R943Q (U) 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) Compound heterozygous 5 38 c.5324T>A p. I1775N (D; N) 38 c.5324T>A p.I1775N (D; N) Homozygous 6 e NI e e NI e e 7 49 c.6764G>T p.S2255I (B) 49 c.6764 G>T p.S2255I (B) Homozygous 8 19; 40 c.2828 G>A; c.5503A>T p.R943Q (U); p.N1868I (U) 3 c.265G>T p.E89* (D; N) Compound heterozygous 9 38 c.5335T>C p.Y1779H (D;N) 38 c.5335T>C p.Y1779H (D;N) Homozygous 10 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) Homozygous 11 6 c.723A>T p.E241D (D;N) 36 c.5114G>A p.R1705Q (D) Compound heterozygous 12 2 c.71G>A (D) p.R24H e NI e Heterozygous 13 30 c.4537_4538insC p.Q1513Pfs*41 (D; N) e NI e Heterozygous 14 32 c.4667G>C p.R1556T (D; N) 32 c.4667G>C p.R1556T (D; N) Homozygous 15 45 c.6221G>T p.G2074V (D; N) 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) Compound heterozygous 16 16; 41 c.2453G>A; c.5824G>C p. G818E (D); p. E1942Q (B;N) 46 c.6384A>G p.H2128R (D) Compound heterozygous 17 16 c.2453G>A p. G818E (D) e NI e Heterozygous 18 32 c.4653G>A p. W1551* (D; N) e NI e Heterozygous 19 23 c.3386G>T p. R1129L (D) e NI e Heterozygous 20 36 c.5045_5059del GTTGCCATCTGCGTG p.V1682_ V1686del (D; N) 29; 49 c.4328G>A; c.6764G>T p.R1443H (D); p.S2255I (B) Compound heterozygous 21 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S (D) 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S (D) Homozygous 22 e NI e e NI e e STGD accounts for approximately 7% of all retinal dystrophies; it is one of the most common genetic forms of juvenile or early adult onset macular degeneration. Login to comment
119 ABCA4 Exon # Nucleotide change Predicted protein effect Number of alleles Population genotypic frequency in EVS Population allelic frequency in EVS (%) 1 c.52C>T p.R18W 1 TT &#bc; 0/TC &#bc; 2/CC &#bc; 6501 T &#bc; 0.015/C &#bc; 99.985 2 c.71G>A p.R24H 1 AA &#bc; 0/AG &#bc; 1/GG &#bc; 6502 A &#bc; 0.008/G &#bc; 99.992 3 c.265G>T p.E89* (N) 1 NR NR 6 c.634C>T p.R212C 1 TT &#bc; 0/TC &#bc; 2/CC &#bc; 6501 T &#bc; 0.015/C &#bc; 99.985 6 c.723A>T p.E241D (N) 1 NR NR 8 c.868C>T p.R290W 1 NR NR IVS8 IVS8 &#fe; 1G>A Splicing mutation (N) 1 NR NR 13 c.1804C>T p.R602W 1 NR NR 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E 7 NR NR 19 c.2828G>A p.R943Q 2 AA &#bc; 8/AG &#bc; 400/GG &#bc; 6095 A &#bc; 3.199/G &#bc; 96.801 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S 2 GG &#bc; 0/GA &#bc; 1/AA &#bc; 6502 G &#bc; 0.008/A &#bc; 99.992 20 c.3041T>G p.L1014R 1 NR NR 23 c.3386G>T p.R1129L 2 NR NR 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L 1 TT &#bc; 0/TC &#bc; 2/CC &#bc; 6501 T &#bc; 0.015/C &#bc; 99.985 28 c.4249_4251del TTC p.F1417del (N) 1 NR NR 29 c.4328G>A p.R1443H 1 AA &#bc; 0/AG &#bc; 1/GG &#bc; 6502 A &#bc; 0.008/G &#bc; 99.992 30 c.4537_4538insC p.Q1513Pfs*41 (N) 1 NR NR 32 c.4653G>A p.W1551* (N) 1 NR NR 32 c.4667G>C p.R1556T (N) 2 NR NR 36 c.5044_5058del GTTGCCATCTGCGTG p.V1682_V1686del (N) 1 NR NR 36 c.5114G>A p.R1705Q 1 AA &#bc; 0/AG &#bc; 1/GG &#bc; 6502 A &#bc; 0.008/G &#bc; 99.992 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V 8 NR NR 38 c.5324T>A p.I1775N (N) 2 NR NR 38 c.5335T>C p.Y1779H (N) 2 NR NR 40 c.5503A>T p.N1868I 1 TT &#bc; 16/TA &#bc; 589/AA &#bc; 5898 T &#bc; 4.775/A &#bc; 95.225 41 c.5824G>C p.E1942Q (N) 1 NR NR 45 c.6221G>T p.G2074V (N) 1 NR NR 46 c.6384A>G p.H2128R 1 NR NR 49 c.6764G>T p.S2255I 4 TT &#bc; 516/TG &#bc; 1473/GG &#bc; 4514 T &#bc; 19.26/G &#bc; 80.74 gold standard for ABCA4 mutational screening. Login to comment
126 Interestingly, five out of 46 mutant alleles (11%) were complex alleles (p.R18W &#fe; p.S2255I; p.R602W &#fe; p.R943W; p.R943W &#fe; p.N1868I; p.G818E &#fe; p.E1942Q; and p.R1443H &#fe; p.S2255I), a frequency that is in agreement with previous reports (Lewis et al., 1999; Shroyer et al., 2001; Zernant et al., 2011). Login to comment

[hide] A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinica... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15. Fujinami K, Lois N, Davidson AE, Mackay DS, Hogg CR, Stone EM, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Bunce C, Robson AG, Moore AT, Webster AR, Holder GE, Michaelides M
A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinical and electrophysiologic assessment, progression, and genotype correlations.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15., [PMID:23499370]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic natural history of Stargardt disease and correlate with the genotype. DESIGN: Cohort study of 59 patients. METHODS: Clinical history, examination, and electrophysiologic assessment were undertaken in a longitudinal survey. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on electrophysiologic findings, as previously published: Group 1 had dysfunction confined to the macula; Group 2 had macular and generalized cone system dysfunction; and Group 3 had macular and both generalized cone and rod system dysfunction. At baseline, there were 27 patients in Group 1, 17 in Group 2, and 15 in Group 3. Amplitude reduction of >50% in the relevant electroretinogram (ERG) component or a peak time shift of >3 ms for the 30 Hz flicker ERG or bright flash a-wave was considered clinically significant ERG deterioration. Molecular screening of ABCA4 was undertaken. RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 31.7 years, with the mean follow-up interval being 10.5 years. A total of 22% of patients from Group 1 showed ERG group transition during follow-up, with 11% progressing to Group 2 and 11% to Group 3. Forty-seven percent of patients in Group 2 progressed to Group 3. There was clinically significant ERG deterioration in 54% of all subjects: 22% of Group 1, 65% of Group 2, and 100% of Group 3. At least 1 disease-causing ABCA4 variant was identified in 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with initial rod ERG involvement demonstrated clinically significant electrophysiologic deterioration; only 20% of patients with normal full-field ERGs at baseline showed clinically significant progression. Such data assist counseling by providing more accurate prognostic information and are also highly relevant in the design, patient selection, and monitoring of potential therapeutic interventions.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
89 Clinical Data and Molecular Genetic Status of 59 Patients With Stargardt Disease Pt Onset (y) Age (y) logMAR VA Variants Identifieda BL FU BL FU 1 16 17 26 0.0/1.0 0.0/0.48 c.768G>T / p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg943Gln 2 15 17 25 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p. Arg1443His 3 11 18 27 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Trp439* / p.Gly863Ala / p.Leu1970Phe 4 19 21 32 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Leu2027Phe 5 10 22 30 0.48/0.48 1.0/0.78 p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg943Gln / c.5461-10 T>C 6 18 26 37 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Pro1380Phe 7 25 28 40 0.78/1.0 1.3/0.78 ND 8 24 29 38 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Phe418Ser / p.Leu2027Phe 9 24 31 44 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.0 c.4253&#fe;5 G>T / p.Gly1507Arg 10 26 32 44 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Cys1490Tyr / p.Arg2030Gln 11 31 34 46 0.18/0.3 0.6/0.7 ND 12 17 35 47 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Asn96His 13 23 35 45 1.0/0.3 1.0/0.48 p.Gly1513Profs*1554 14 33 37 48 0.18/1.48 1.0/1.3 ND 15 38 40 51 0.18/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Arg2107His 16 42 43 53 0.0/0.0 1.0/1.0 ND 17 22 48 59 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr 18 20 49 59 1.0/0.6 1.0/1.0 p.Pro1380Leu / p.Gly1961Glu 19 35 50 61 1.0/0.3 1.0/1.0 p.Arg1108Cys 20 25 56 67 1.3/0.18 1.0/1.0 p.Trp439* / p.Gly863Ala 21 48 59 71 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 p. Ile156 Val / p. Cys1455Arg / p. Phe1839Ser 22 21 22 31 0.3/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Arg2107His 23 21 23 33 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala 24 48 64 73 0.0/1.0 0.18/3.0 p.Tyr1652* 25 17 19 29 0.78/0.3 1.0/1.0 c.5461-10 T>C 26 17 21 33 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 ND 27 27 53 66 1.78/1.78 1.3/1.0 p.Ser1071Cysfs*1084 28 5 14 21 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Arg408* / p.Val675lle 29 9 15 27 1.08/1.08 1.0/1.0 p.Cys2150Tyr 30 14 24 32 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 ND 31 18 28 39 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg1108Cys / p.Arg943Gln 32 14 29 37 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Arg653Cys / p.Arg2030Gln 33 19 29 40 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.08 ND 34 34 40 49 0.3/0.48 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala / p.Glu1087Lys 35 25 43 54 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr / p.Gly863Ala 36 38 60 69 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.08 p.Val931Met / c.5461-10 T>C 37 10 11 20 1.0/0.78 1.3/1.3 p.Pro1380Leu 38 10 15 23 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.3 p.Ser1071Cysfs*1084 / p.Pro1380Leu 39 24 25 38 1.56/0.3 2.0/2.0 c.5461-10 T>C / c.5714&#fe;5 G>A 40 18 26 36 1.3/1.3 2.0/1.3 ND 41 32 33 45 0.48/0.48 1.0/1.0 ND 42 32 35 46 1.3/0.0 3.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr 43 30 35 45 0.48/0.48 2.0/1.3 ND 44 15 41 49 1.3/1.3 2.0/1.3 p.Asn965Ser 45 8 8 20 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Thr1019Met 46 10 11 23 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Thr1019Met 47 8 12 24 2.0/1.56 1.78/1.48 p.Cys2150Tyr 48 17 18 26 1.0/0.78 1.3/1.0 c.5461-10 T>C / p.Leu2027Phe 49 8 21 33 1.3/1.3 2.0/2.0 p.Asp574Aspfs*582 50 8 27 39 2.0/1.56 1.78/1.48 c.5461-10 T>C 51 24 31 43 1.18/1.18 1.08/1.3 p.Arg1640Trp / p.Leu2027Phe Continued on next page respective electrophysiologic traces appear in Figure 2. Login to comment

[hide] ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570. Fujinami K, Zernant J, Chana RK, Wright GA, Tsunoda K, Ozawa Y, Tsubota K, Webster AR, Moore AT, Allikmets R, Michaelides M
ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing in a British cohort.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570., [PMID:23982839]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We applied a recently reported next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy for screening the ABCA4 gene in a British cohort with ABCA4-associated disease and report novel mutations. METHODS: We identified 79 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ABCA4-associated disease who had a single variant identified by the ABCA4 microarray. Comprehensive phenotypic data were obtained, and the NGS strategy was applied to identify the second allele by means of sequencing the entire coding region and adjacent intronic sequences of the ABCA4 gene. Identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and assessed for pathogenicity by in silico analysis. RESULTS: Of the 42 variants detected by prescreening with the microarray, in silico analysis suggested that 34, found in 66 subjects, were disease-causing and 8, found in 13 subjects, were benign variants. We detected 42 variants by NGS, of which 39 were classified as disease-causing. Of these 39 variants, 31 were novel, including 16 missense, 7 splice-site-altering, 4 nonsense, 1 in-frame deletion, and 3 frameshift variants. Two or more disease-causing variants were confirmed in 37 (47%) of 79 patients, one disease-causing variant in 36 (46%) subjects, and no disease-causing variant in 6 (7%) individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the NGS platform for ABCA4 screening enabled detection of the second disease-associated allele in approximately half of the patients in a British cohort where one mutation had been detected with the arrayed primer extension (APEX) array. The time- and cost-efficient NGS strategy is useful in screening large cohorts, which will be increasingly valuable with the advent of ABCA4-directed therapies.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
55 1 c.161G>A p.C54Y DC c.2297G>T p.G766V DC 2 2 c.223T>G p.C75G DC c.5088C>G p.S1696R DC 2 3 c.740A>C p.N247T DC c.1433T>C p.I478T B c.2345G>A p.W782* DC 2 4 c.768G>T Splice site DC 1 5 c.1222C>T p.R408* DC c.2568C>A p.Y856* DC 2 6 c.1804C>T p.R602W DC c.859-9T>C Splice site PDC 2 7 c.1805G>A p.R602Q DC c.5113C>T p.R1705W DC 2 8 c.1922G>C p.C641S DC 1 9 c.1957C>T p.R653C DC 1 10 c.1957C>T p.R653C DC 1 11 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.655A>T p.R219* DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R219*) was APEX-false-negative 12 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 13 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 14 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC 1 15 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC 1 16 c.2894A>G p.N965S DC c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R1108C) was APEX-false-negative 17 c.3064G>A p.E1022K DC c.6729&#fe;4_&#fe;18delAGTTGGCCCTGGGGC Splice site DC 2 18 c.3064G>A p.E1022K DC 1 19 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.2942C>T p.P981L DC c.6529G>A p.D2177N B 2 20 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.1519G>T p.D507Y DC 2 21 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.4634G>A p.S1545N DC 2 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC 1 23 c.3292C>T p.R1098C DC c.3299T>A p.I1100N DC 2 24 c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC c.4978delC p.L1661* DC 2 25 c.3386G>A p.R1129H DC c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.4634G>A p.S1545N DC 3 Allele 2 (p.S1071fs) was APEX false-negative and allele 1 (p.R1129H) was NGS false-negative 26 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.3191-1G>T Splice site DC 2 27 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.3398T>C p.I1133T PDC 2 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.4070C>A p.A1357E DC 2 29 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.4773G>C Splice site DC 2 30 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 31 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 32 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 33 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* DC 1 34 c.4319T>C p.F1440S DC 1 35 c.4328G>A p.R1443H DC c.180delG p.M61fs DC 2 36 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y DC c.1726G>C p.D576H DC 2 37 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y DC 1 38 c.4537_4538insC p.Q1513fs DC c.5578C>T p.R1860W DC 2 Allele 1 (p.Q1513fs) was NGS-false-negative 39 c.4577C>T p.T1526M DC 1 T ABLE 2. Continued Pt Allele 1 Detected by APEX Allele 2 Detected by NGS Allele 3 Detected by NGS Total N of DC Variants Comments DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. Login to comment
62 Hum Var Score (0-1) Site Wt CV Mt CV CV % Variation 3 c.161G>A p.C54Y 1 1 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.11 PRD 0.994 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs150774447) 3 c.223T>G p.C75G 1 2 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. NA POD 0.603 No change ND 5 c.466A>G p.I156V 2 77, 78 [ [ Papaioannou M, et al. 16 Tol. 0.46 B 0.003 No change 16/13006 db SNP (rs112467008) Benign 6 c.655A>T p.R219* 1 11 [ Xi Q, et al. 27 ND 6 c.740A>C p.N247T 1 3 [ [ APEX Del. NA B 0.135 No change ND 6 c.768G>T Splice site 1 4 [ [ Klevering BJ, et al. 22 Tol. 0.56 NA Don. 70.4 58 Site broken (17.51) ND 9 c.1222C>T p.R408* 1 5 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 ND 12 c.1726G>C p.D576H 1 36 [ Downs K, et al. 25 POD 0.688 Acc. 68.1 39.1 Site broken (42.54) 1/13006 13 c.1804C>T p.R602W 1 6 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 B 0.129 No change ND db SNP (rs 6179409) 13 c.1805G>A p.R602Q 1 7 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.04 PRD 0.513 Acc. 48.9 77.9 New site (&#fe;59.14) 2/13006 db SNP (rs61749410) 13 c.1906C>T p.Q636* 3 12, 13, 60 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs145961131) 13 c.1922G>C p.C641S 1 8 [ [ Stenirri S, et al. 24 Del. 0.00 No change ND db SNP (rs61749416) 14 c.1957C>T p.R653C 2 9, 10 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.999 No change ND db SNP (rs61749420) 17 c.2588G>C p.G863A/ p.DelG863 5 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 / Maugeri A, et al. 29 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.996 No change 68/13006 db SNP (rs76157638) 18 c.2701A>G p.T901A 1 74 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.82 B 0.008 23/13006 db SNP (rs139655975) Benign 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S 1 16 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.03 PRD 0.981 Acc. 53.4 82.3 New site (&#fe;54.26) ND db SNP (rs201471607) 20 c.2971G>C p.G991R 1 67 [ [ Yatsenko AN, et al. 13 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 28/13006 db SNP (rs147484266) Benign 22 c.3064G>A p.E1022K 2 17, 18 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.00 PRD 1.000 No change ND db SNP (rs61749459) 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs 5 19, 20, 21, 22, 25 [ [ APEX ND False-negative in APEX in patient 25 22 c.3292C>T p.R1098C 1 23 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. NA PRD 0.999 No change ND 22 c.3322C>T p.R1108C 3 16, 24, 61 [ [ Rozet JM, et al. 10 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.986 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs61750120) False-negative in APEX in patients 16 and 61 23 c.3386G>A p.R1129H 1 25 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 PRD 0.989 No change ND False-negative in NGS in patient 25 24 c.3602T>G p.L1201R 4 72, 73, 74, 79 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.37 B 0.052 Don. 61.3 73.7 New site (20.08) 416/13006 db SNP (rs61750126) Benign 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L 7 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.01 B 0.377 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs61750130) 28 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* 1 33 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 ND db SNP (rs61750137) 29 c.4283C>T p.T1428M 1 76 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.15 B 0.010 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs1800549) Benign 29 c.4319T>C p.F1440S 1 34 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 POD 0.744 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750141) 29 c.4326C>A p.N1442K 1 64 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Tol. NA POD 0.374 No change ND 29 c.4328G>A p.R1443H 1 35 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 1/13006 dbSNP (rs61750142) IVS29 c.4352&#fe;1G>A Splice site 1 73 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Don. 82.3 55.4 WT site broken (32.62) ND 30 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y 2 36, 37 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.994 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751402) 30 c.4538A>G p.Q1513R 1 67 [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Tol. NA Benign 0.043 Acc. 91.7 62.8 Site broken (31.55) ND T ABLE 3. Continued Exon/ IVS Nucleotide Substitution Protein Change/ Effect N of Alleles Identified Pt Method Previous Report SIFT Polyphen 2 HSF Matrix Allele Freq. by EVS Reference Comment APEX NGS Pred. Tol. Index (0-1) Pred. Login to comment