ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Arg653Cys

ClinVar:	c.1957C>T , p.Arg653Cys ? , not provided
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (75%), C: D (85%), D: D (75%), E: D (75%), F: D (80%), G: D (75%), H: D (66%), I: D (75%), K: N (61%), L: D (75%), M: D (75%), N: D (59%), P: D (75%), Q: D (66%), S: D (66%), T: D (59%), V: D (75%), W: D (91%), Y: D (75%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: N, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Correlation between photoreceptor layer integrity ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 3;53(8):4409-15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8201. Print 2012 Jul. Testa F, Rossi S, Sodi A, Passerini I, Di Iorio V, Della Corte M, Banfi S, Surace EM, Menchini U, Auricchio A, Simonelli F
Correlation between photoreceptor layer integrity and visual function in patients with Stargardt disease: implications for gene therapy.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 3;53(8):4409-15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8201. Print 2012 Jul., [PMID:22661472]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To perform a clinical characterization of Stargardt patients with ABCA4 gene mutation, and to investigate the correlation between the inner and outer segment (IS/OS) junction morphology and visual acuity, fundus lesions, electroretinogram abnormalities, and macular sensitivity. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with Stargardt disease (STGD) were given a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. Inner-outer photoreceptor junction morphology evaluated by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was correlated with visual acuity, fundus lesions, fundus autofluorescence, full-field and multifocal electroretinography responses, and microperimetric macular sensitivities. We classified STGD patients into three groups: (1) IS/OS junction disorganization in the fovea, (2) IS/OS junction loss in the fovea, and (3) extensive loss of IS/OS junction. Mutation analysis of the ABCA4 gene was carried out by sequencing the complete coding region. RESULTS: A significant difference in visual acuity was observed between IS/OS groups 1 and 2 and between IS/OS groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.0001). A significant difference in microperimetry sensitivity was observed between IS/OS groups 2 and 3, and between IS/OS groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.0001). There was also a statistically significant correlation between IS/OS abnormalities and the extent of fundus lesions (Spearman P </= 0.01), as well as with the type of ERG and multifocal ERG results (Spearman P </= 0.01). Finally, the degree of IS/OS junction preservation showed a statistically significant correlation with the extension of foveal abnormalities assessed by fundus autofluorescence imaging (Spearman P </= 0.01). The G1961E mutation was more frequent in the patients without extensive loss of IS/OS junction (P = 0.01) confirming its association with a milder STGD phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a comprehensive approach in the examination of Stargardt patients has the potential to improve the understanding of vision loss and may provide a sensitive measure to evaluate the efficacy of future experimental therapies in patients with STGD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
66 Clinical and Molecular Data of STGD Patients Patient ID/Fam Age (y) Visual Acuity OCT ft (lm) MP (dB) IS/OS* Fundus† FAF‡ ERG§ mfERGjj Mutation 1 Mutation 2 4/2 50 0.0715 134 5.25 - 1 - 2 4 G1961E 250InsCAAA 5/2 47 0.1 127 14.2 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E 250InsCAAA 6/3 33 0.05 125 9.8 2 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2149X 7/4 18 0.085 135 0 - 2 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 8/5 16 0.095 104 0.9 3 2 3 3 4 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 9/6 71 0.03 109 0 3 3 3 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 11/7 46 0.2 137 9.35 2 1 2 1 1 Y850K A1598D 13/8 35 0.017 163 0 - 3 - 3 4 L541P R1098C 15/10 20 0.1 135.5 11.05 2 1 1 1 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 16/11 20 0.47 96 16.7 2 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 17/11 34 0.1 114.5 7.55 2 1 2 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 18/11 18 1 134 16.15 1 1 1 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 19/12 12 0.12 242 6.5 3 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 20/13 28 0.1 111 14.2 2 2 2 1 3 R1443H IVS35þ2t > c 21/14 34 0.2 152 14.15 2 1 2 2 4 R653C G1961E 22/15 69 0.079 122 0 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T R2149X 23/15 46 0.55 162 1.05 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T IVS45þ1g > c 25/16 28 0.11 105.5 3.1 3 2 2 3 4 R212C R212C 26/17 13 0.084 138.5 0.2 3 2 3 1 3 R18W C1490Y 27/4 20 0.0775 131 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 28/4 23 0.042 159.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 30/18 29 0.0375 103 0 3 3 3 3 4 N965S G1961E 31/19 17 0.1 102 9 3 2 2 3 4 L541P F655C 38/20 20 0.225 95 16 2 1 1 3 4 L541P G1961E 39/21 20 0.17 146 16.7 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E R2030X 42/22 43 0.575 127 7.05 2 1 2 1 2 250insCAAA G1961E 43/23 12 0.1 117.5 11.55 2 2 2 1 3 IVS40þ5g > a IVS15-8g > a 44/24 29 0.1 149 18.5 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E 4736del6bpins2bp 46/25 38 0.0075 182.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 G618R G1972R 48/26 35 0.46 133.5 12.25 2 1 - 1 3 4538insC G1961E 50/27 13 0.2 122.5 17.35 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 51/28 24 0.065 123 0 3 3 3 3 4 250InsCAAA V767D 52/29 14 1 147 6.15 1 1 1 3 4 L2027F A1881V 53/30 45 0.1 120 6.05 3 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2030X 54/30 24 0.09 159 2.65 3 3 3 3 4 V767D R2030X 55/31 34 0.085 150 5.15 3 3 3 3 4 N96H IVS40þ5g > a 56/32 48 0.0335 118.5 4.4 - 3 - 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 58/32 52 0.05 124 5.8 3 2 2 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 60/33 43 0.065 163 15.95 2 1 - 1 2 250InsCAAA G1961E 61/34 45 0.03 187.5 4.5 1 1 1 2 1 R1640Q G1961E 64/35 33 0.0665 158 0 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 65/35 38 0.008 172 0.05 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 66/36 42 0.4 137 0.95 3 2 2 1 3 N96D IVS40þ5g > a 67/37 14 0.235 132 0.15 3 2 3 3 4 IVS6-2a > t IVS6-2a > t 69/38 19 0.09 120 0 3 1 2 1 3 R511H N529S 70/39 42 0.515 140 0.4 3 3 3 3 4 IVS40þ5g > a N965S 72/40 33 0.096 116.5 5.1 3 2 2 1 3 N96D L2140Q 73/41 17 0.1 160 14.35 2 2 2 3 4 G690D A1598D 74/42 36 0.0125 142.5 0 3 3 3 3 4 N96H N96H 75/43 45 0.2 214.5 11.7 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 77/44 19 0.34 137.5 11.75 2 1 - 1 3 G1961E G618R 81/45 66 0.335 163 2 - 3 - 2 4 N96D G1961E 82/46 41 0.1 116.5 0.15 3 3 3 3 4 4538insC IVS40þ5g > a 83/47 17 0.395 165 19.25 1 1 1 1 2 G1961E IVS45þ1g > c 84/47 26 0.135 120 16.2 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E IVS45þ1g > c 85/48 10 0.16 149.5 12.4 2 2 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c IVS40þ5g > a 87/40 25 0.9 155 15 2 1 2 1 2 N96D L2140Q 88/49 32 0.0715 144 0.1 - 3 - 3 4 IVS45þ1g > c R2149X 89/50 14 0.1185 147 1.85 3 1 - 3 4 P402A 250insCAAA 90/51 35 0.07 116.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 A1598D R2030X 94/52 30 0.1 144 12.85 2 1 - 1 1 A1598D G1961E Fam, family; OCT ft, optical coherence tomography foveal thickness; MP, microperimetry; IS/OS, inner-outer segment junction; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; ERG, electroretinogram; mfERG, multifocal-electroretinogram. Login to comment
67 Clinical and Molecular Data of STGD Patients Patient ID/Fam Age (y) Visual Acuity OCT ft (lm) MP (dB) IS/OS* Fundusߤ FAFߥ ERG&#a7; mfERGjj Mutation 1 Mutation 2 4/2 50 0.0715 134 5.25 - 1 - 2 4 G1961E 250InsCAAA 5/2 47 0.1 127 14.2 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E 250InsCAAA 6/3 33 0.05 125 9.8 2 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2149X 7/4 18 0.085 135 0 - 2 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 8/5 16 0.095 104 0.9 3 2 3 3 4 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 9/6 71 0.03 109 0 3 3 3 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 11/7 46 0.2 137 9.35 2 1 2 1 1 Y850K A1598D 13/8 35 0.017 163 0 - 3 - 3 4 L541P R1098C 15/10 20 0.1 135.5 11.05 2 1 1 1 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 16/11 20 0.47 96 16.7 2 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 17/11 34 0.1 114.5 7.55 2 1 2 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 18/11 18 1 134 16.15 1 1 1 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 19/12 12 0.12 242 6.5 3 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 20/13 28 0.1 111 14.2 2 2 2 1 3 R1443H IVS35&#fe;2t > c 21/14 34 0.2 152 14.15 2 1 2 2 4 R653C G1961E 22/15 69 0.079 122 0 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T R2149X 23/15 46 0.55 162 1.05 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T IVS45&#fe;1g > c 25/16 28 0.11 105.5 3.1 3 2 2 3 4 R212C R212C 26/17 13 0.084 138.5 0.2 3 2 3 1 3 R18W C1490Y 27/4 20 0.0775 131 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 28/4 23 0.042 159.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 30/18 29 0.0375 103 0 3 3 3 3 4 N965S G1961E 31/19 17 0.1 102 9 3 2 2 3 4 L541P F655C 38/20 20 0.225 95 16 2 1 1 3 4 L541P G1961E 39/21 20 0.17 146 16.7 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E R2030X 42/22 43 0.575 127 7.05 2 1 2 1 2 250insCAAA G1961E 43/23 12 0.1 117.5 11.55 2 2 2 1 3 IVS40&#fe;5g > a IVS15-8g > a 44/24 29 0.1 149 18.5 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E 4736del6bpins2bp 46/25 38 0.0075 182.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 G618R G1972R 48/26 35 0.46 133.5 12.25 2 1 - 1 3 4538insC G1961E 50/27 13 0.2 122.5 17.35 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 51/28 24 0.065 123 0 3 3 3 3 4 250InsCAAA V767D 52/29 14 1 147 6.15 1 1 1 3 4 L2027F A1881V 53/30 45 0.1 120 6.05 3 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2030X 54/30 24 0.09 159 2.65 3 3 3 3 4 V767D R2030X 55/31 34 0.085 150 5.15 3 3 3 3 4 N96H IVS40&#fe;5g > a 56/32 48 0.0335 118.5 4.4 - 3 - 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 58/32 52 0.05 124 5.8 3 2 2 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 60/33 43 0.065 163 15.95 2 1 - 1 2 250InsCAAA G1961E 61/34 45 0.03 187.5 4.5 1 1 1 2 1 R1640Q G1961E 64/35 33 0.0665 158 0 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 65/35 38 0.008 172 0.05 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 66/36 42 0.4 137 0.95 3 2 2 1 3 N96D IVS40&#fe;5g > a 67/37 14 0.235 132 0.15 3 2 3 3 4 IVS6-2a > t IVS6-2a > t 69/38 19 0.09 120 0 3 1 2 1 3 R511H N529S 70/39 42 0.515 140 0.4 3 3 3 3 4 IVS40&#fe;5g > a N965S 72/40 33 0.096 116.5 5.1 3 2 2 1 3 N96D L2140Q 73/41 17 0.1 160 14.35 2 2 2 3 4 G690D A1598D 74/42 36 0.0125 142.5 0 3 3 3 3 4 N96H N96H 75/43 45 0.2 214.5 11.7 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 77/44 19 0.34 137.5 11.75 2 1 - 1 3 G1961E G618R 81/45 66 0.335 163 2 - 3 - 2 4 N96D G1961E 82/46 41 0.1 116.5 0.15 3 3 3 3 4 4538insC IVS40&#fe;5g > a 83/47 17 0.395 165 19.25 1 1 1 1 2 G1961E IVS45&#fe;1g > c 84/47 26 0.135 120 16.2 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E IVS45&#fe;1g > c 85/48 10 0.16 149.5 12.4 2 2 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c IVS40&#fe;5g > a 87/40 25 0.9 155 15 2 1 2 1 2 N96D L2140Q 88/49 32 0.0715 144 0.1 - 3 - 3 4 IVS45&#fe;1g > c R2149X 89/50 14 0.1185 147 1.85 3 1 - 3 4 P402A 250insCAAA 90/51 35 0.07 116.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 A1598D R2030X 94/52 30 0.1 144 12.85 2 1 - 1 1 A1598D G1961E Fam, family; OCT ft, optical coherence tomography foveal thickness; MP, microperimetry; IS/OS, inner-outer segment junction; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; ERG, electroretinogram; mfERG, multifocal-electroretinogram. Statistics Our set of data is described by continuous (BCVA, OCT foveal thickness, and macular sensitivities) and categorical (fundus, FAF, IS/ OS, ERG, and mfERG groups) variables. Login to comment

[hide] Stargardt macular dystrophy: common ABCA4 mutation... Mol Vis. 2012;18:280-9. Epub 2012 Feb 1. Roberts LJ, Nossek CA, Greenberg LJ, Ramesar RS
Stargardt macular dystrophy: common ABCA4 mutations in South Africa--establishment of a rapid genetic test and relating risk to patients.
Mol Vis. 2012;18:280-9. Epub 2012 Feb 1., [PMID:22328824]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Based on the previous indications of founder ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 4 gene (ABCA4) mutations in a South African subpopulation, the purpose was to devise a mechanism for identifying common disease-causing mutations in subjects with ABCA4-associated retinopathies (AARs). Facilitating patient access to this data and determining the frequencies of the mutations in the South African population would enhance the current molecular diagnostic service offered. METHODS: The majority of subjects in this study were of Caucasian ancestry and affected with Stargardt macular dystrophy. The initial cohort consisted of DNA samples from 181 patients, and was screened using the ABCR400 chip. An assay was then designed to screen a secondary cohort of 72 patients for seven of the most commonly occurring ABCA4 mutations in this population. A total of 269 control individuals were also screened for the seven ABCA4 mutations. RESULTS: Microarray screening results from a cohort of 181 patients affected with AARs revealed that seven ABCA4 mutations (p.Arg152*, c.768G>T, p.Arg602Trp, p.Gly863Ala, p.Cys1490Tyr, c.5461-10T>C, and p.Leu2027Phe) occurred at a relatively high frequency. The newly designed genetic assay identified two of the seven disease-associated mutations in 28/72 patients in a secondary patient cohort. In the control cohort, 12/269 individuals were found to be heterozygotes, resulting in an estimated background frequency of these mutations in this particular population of 4.46 per 100 individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively high detection rate of seven ABCA4 mutations in the primary patient cohort led to the design and subsequent utility of a multiplex assay. This assay can be used as a viable screening tool and to reduce costs and laboratory time. The estimated background frequency of the seven ABCA4 mutations, together with the improved diagnostic service, could be used by counselors to facilitate clinical and genetic management of South African families with AARs.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
139 of alleles detected Frequency p.Cys54Tyr c. 161 G>A 2 0.55% p.Arg152* c. 454 C>T 12 3.31% p.Arg152Gln c. 455 G>A 3 0.83% p.Gly172Ser c. 514 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg212Cys c. 634 C>T 1 0.28% p.Lys223Gln c. 667 A>C 1 0.28% p.V256V (Splice) c. 768 G>T 18 4.97% p.Pro291Leu c. 872 C>T 1 0.28% p.Trp439* c. 1317 G>A 1 0.28% p.Ala538Asp c. 1613 C>A 1 0.28% p.Leu541Pro c. 1622 T>C 1 0.28% p.Arg602Trp c. 1885C>T 30 8.29% p.Val643Met c. 1927 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg653Cys c. 1957 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg681* c. 2041 C>T 3 0.83% p.Val767Asp c. 2300 T>A 1 0.28% p.Trp855* c.2564_2571delGGTACCTT 2 0.55% p.Gly863Ala c. 2588 G>C 11 3.04% p.Val931Met c. 2791 G>A 1 0.28% p.Asn965Ser c. 2894 A>G 4 1.10% p.Val989Ala c. 2966 T>C 1 0.28% p.Gly991Arg c. 2971 G>C 1 0.28% p.Thr1019Met c. 3056 C>T 1 0.28% p.Ala1038Val c. 3113 C>T 3 0.83% p.Glu1087Lys c. 3259 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg1108Cys c. 3322 C>T 2 0.55% p.Leu1201Arg c. 3602 T>G 4 1.10% p.Arg1300Gln c. 3899 G>A 4 1.10% p.Pro1380Leu c. 4139 C>T 3 0.83% p.Trp1408Arg c. 4222 T>C 1 0.28% - c. 4253+5G>A 1 0.28% p.Phe1440Ser c. 4319 T>C 1 0.28% p.Arg1443His c. 4328 G>A 1 0.28% p.Cys1490Tyr c.4469 G>A 54 14.92% p.Gln1513Pro fs*42 c. 4535 insC 1 0.28% p.Ala1598Asp c. 4793C>A 1 0.28% p.Arg1640Trp c. 4918 C>T 2 0.55% p.Ser1642Arg c. 4926 C>G 1 0.28% p.V1681_C1685del c. 5041 del15 1 0.28% - c. 5461-10T>C 24 6.63% - c. 5714+5 G>A 2 0.55% p.Pro1948Leu c. 5843 C>T 1 0.28% p.Gly1961Glu c. 5882 G>A 4 1.10% p.Leu2027Phe c.6079 C>T 30 8.29% p.Arg2030* c. 6088 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg2030Gln c. 6089 G>A 3 0.83% p.Arg2038Trp c. 6112 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg2107His c. 6320 G>A 2 0.55% p.Arg2118Glu fs*27 c. 6352 delA 1 0.28% p.Cys2150Tyr c. 6449 G>A 1 0.28% p.Gln2220* c. 6658 C>T 1 0.28% p.Gly863Ala mutation, which appears to have a founder effect in the Netherlands [13,15], the results obtained from the current study are in agreement with September et al.`s conclusions [9]. Login to comment

[hide] Novel mutations in of the ABCR gene in Italian pat... Eye (Lond). 2010 Jan;24(1):158-64. Epub 2009 Mar 6. Passerini I, Sodi A, Giambene B, Mariottini A, Menchini U, Torricelli F
Novel mutations in of the ABCR gene in Italian patients with Stargardt disease.
Eye (Lond). 2010 Jan;24(1):158-64. Epub 2009 Mar 6., [PMID:19265867]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Stargardt disease (STGD) is the most prevalent juvenile macular dystrophy, and it has been associated with mutations in the ABCR gene, encoding a photoreceptor-specific transport protein. In this study, we determined the mutation spectrum in the ABCR gene in a group of Italian STGD patients. METHODS: The DNA samples of 71 Italian patients (from 62 independent pedigrees), affected with autosomal recessive STGD, were analysed for mutations in all 50 exons of the ABCR gene by the DHPLC approach (with optimization of the DHPLC conditions for mutation analysis) and direct sequencing techniques. RESULTS: In our group of STGD patients, 71 mutations were identified in 68 patients with a detection rate of 95.7%. Forty-three mutations had been already reported in the literature, whereas 28 mutations had not been previously described and were not detected in 150 unaffected control individuals of Italian origin. Missense mutations represented the most frequent finding (59.2%); G1961E was the most common mutation and it was associated with phenotypes in various degrees of severity. CONCLUSIONS: Some novel mutations in the ABCR gene were reported in a group of Italian STGD patients confirming the extensive allelic heterogeneity of this gene-probably related to the vast number of exons that favours rearrangements in the DNA sequence.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
57 Table 2 Summary of the mutations identified in the ABCR gene in our series of STGD Italian patients Patient Allele 1 mutation Allele 2 mutation S 1 R212C T1019M S 8 V1433I V1433I S 21 A1598D A1598D S 33 N96K G978D S 56 A1598D G1961E S 70 R212C T1019M S 71 W700X WT S 74 6750delA V767D S 77 G1961E WT S 82 Q21X G1961E S 106 C1177X G1961E S 107 C1177X G1961E S 114 T970P-F1015E - S 115 T970P-F1015E - S 120 N415K G1961E S 162 324-327insT 324-327insT S 181 W1408X G1961E S 190 C1177X A1598D S 201 G1961E WT S 202 Q21X T970P-F1015E S 213 M840R G1961E S 231 WT WT S 236 C1177X G1961E S 237 WT WT S 241 V256 splice WT S 246 IVS6-1g4t R1108C S 260 L2221P 5109delG-I156V S 321 IVS9 þ 1G4C S1099X S 328 IVS42 þ 4delG IVS35 þ 2t4c S 346 E2096K WT S 347 IVS28 þ 5g4a WT S 353 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 354 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 355 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 360 G1961E 5961delGGAC S 364 IVS35 þ 2t4c G1961E S 365 L541P/A1038V G1961E S 377 IVS42 þ 4delG IVS35 þ 2t4c S 380 R653C WT S 413 R212C T1019M S 414 A1598D G1961E S 417 G1078E G1961E S 438 R1055W WT S 440 4021ins24bp T1526M-G1961E S 449 W1479X L2140Q S 450 W1479X L2140Q S 474 W1461X G 1977S S 486 WT WT S 492 R1098C/L1970F 6548insTGAA S 528 T977P IVS40 þ 5g4a S 531 G690V Q1332X S 532 R572X L1473M-4733delGTTT S 535 IVS40 þ 5g4a 5917delG S 550 IVS40 þ 5g4a 6750delA S 555 250insCAAA WT S 556 250insCAAA WT S 575 N96H G1961E S 590 W821R IVS40 þ 5g4a S 592 V931M R1108C S 593 V767D R2030X Table 2 (Continued ) Patient Allele 1 mutation Allele 2 mutation S 594 G172S G1961E S 602 P1380L G1961E S 607 E616K L1580S-K2172R S 640 250insCAAA S1696N S 694 IVS35 þ 2t4c G1961E S 725 IVS13 þ 1g4a Q1376 splice S 731 L541P-A1038V G1961E S 755 N965S IVS40 þ 5g4a S 789 E1087K G1977S S 968 T1019M G1961E S 992 R212C G1961E Bold values indicate novel mutations. Login to comment

[hide] Denaturing HPLC profiling of the ABCA4 gene for re... Clin Chem. 2004 Aug;50(8):1336-43. Epub 2004 Jun 10. Stenirri S, Fermo I, Battistella S, Galbiati S, Soriani N, Paroni R, Manitto MP, Martina E, Brancato R, Allikmets R, Ferrari M, Cremonesi L
Denaturing HPLC profiling of the ABCA4 gene for reliable detection of allelic variations.
Clin Chem. 2004 Aug;50(8):1336-43. Epub 2004 Jun 10., [PMID:15192030]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Mutations in the retina-specific ABC transporter (ABCA4) gene have been associated with several forms of macular degenerations. Because the high complexity of the molecular genotype makes scanning of the ABCA4 gene cumbersome, we describe here the first use of denaturing HPLC (DHPLC) to screen for ABCA4 mutations. METHODS: Temperature conditions were designed for all 50 exons based on effective separation of 83 samples carrying 86 sequence variations and 19 mutagenized controls. For validation, samples from 23 previously characterized Stargardt patients were subjected to DHPLC profiling. Subsequently, samples from a cohort of 30 patients affected by various forms of macular degeneration were subjected to DHPLC scanning under the same conditions. RESULTS: DHPLC profiling not only identified all 132 sequence alterations previously detected by double-gradient denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis but also identified 5 sequence alterations that this approach had missed. Moreover, DHPLC scanning of an additional panel of 30 previously untested patients led to the identification of 26 different mutations and 29 polymorphisms, accounting for 203 sequence variations on 29 of the 30 patients screened. In total, the DHPLC approach allowed us to identify 16 mutations that had never been reported before. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide strong support for the use of DHPLC for molecular characterization of the ABCA4 gene.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
35 Exon Genotypesa Exon Genotypesa 1b M1V (1A>G) (11) 24 3523-28TϾC (12) R18W (52C>T) (11) 25 G1203D (3608G>A)b 3 250_251insCAAA (7) 27 R1300X (3898C>T) (12) N96K (288C>A) R1300Q (3899G>A) (11) 302 ϩ 26 GϾA (13) 28 P1380L (4139CϾT) (14) 4 P143L (428C>T) (10) P1401P (4203CϾA) (15) 5 R152Q (455G>A) (4) 4253 ϩ 43GϾA (12) 6 571-1GϾT (4) 29 4253 ϩ 13GϾA (12) R212H (635G>A) (16) 4354-38GϾA (4) C230S (688T>A) (12) 30a 4466 ϩ 3GϾA (4) 641delG (9) 30b C1490Y (4469G>A) (17) 10 1240-14CϾT (13) P1512R (4535C>G) (4) H423R (1268ϾG) (13) 31 T1526M (4577C>T) (14) 1357 ϩ 11delG (16) 33/34 A1598D (4793C>A) (4) H423H (1269CϾT) (13) 35 4947delC (14) 11 1387delTT (4) 5018 ؉ 2T>C (7) R500R (1500GϾA) (4) 39 H1838Y (5512C>T) (14) 12 L541P (1622T>C) (14) 40 N1868I (5603AϾT) (13) R572Q (1715G>A) (17) L1894L (5682GϾC) (15) 13 Y639X (1917C>G) (17) 5714 ؉ 5G>A C641S (1922G>C) (4) 41 L1938L (5814AϾG) (12) 14 R653C (1957C>T) (12) 42 5836-43CϾA W700X (2099G>A) (4) 5836-11GϾA (15) 3607 ϩ 49TϾC P1948I (5843CϾT) (15) 15 V767D (2300T>A) (7) P1948P (5844AϾG) (15) 16 W821R (2461T>A) (14) G1961E (5882G>A) (14) 17 2588-33CϾTb 43 L1970F (5908C>T) (11) G863A (2588G>C) (17) 44 6006-16AϾG (16) 18 2654-36CϾT (4) I2023I (6069CϾT) (14) T897I (2690C>T) (7) L2027F (6079C>T) (14) 19 R943Q (2828GϾA) (13) 45 V2050L (6148G>C) (14) Y954D (2860T>G) (4) 46 R2107H (6320G>A) (18) N965S (2894A>G) (14) 6386 ؉ 2G>C (10) 20 G978D (2933G>A) (4) 47 R2139W (6415C>T) (14) L988L (2964CϾT) (4) R2149L (6446G>T) (4) 21 E1022K (3064G>A) (4) C2150Y (6449G>A) (19) A1038V (3113C>T) (14) 48 D2177N (6529G>A) (17) G1050D (3149G>A) (4) L2241V (6721C>G) (12) 3211_3212insGT (14) 6729 ϩ 21CϾT (15) 22 E1087K (3259G>A) (14) 49 6730-3TϾC (15) R1098C (3292C>T) (12) S2255I (6764GϾT) (13) S1099P (3295T>C) (4) 6816 ϩ 28GϾC (4) R1108C (3322C>T) (14) R1129L (3386G>T) (17) a Bold indicates disease-causing mutations. Login to comment
34 Exon Genotypesa Exon Genotypesa 1b M1V (1A>G) (11) 24 3523-28Tb0e;C (12) R18W (52C>T) (11) 25 G1203D (3608G>A)b 3 250_251insCAAA (7) 27 R1300X (3898C>T) (12) N96K (288C>A) R1300Q (3899G>A) (11) 302 af9; 26 Gb0e;A (13) 28 P1380L (4139Cb0e;T) (14) 4 P143L (428C>T) (10) P1401P (4203Cb0e;A) (15) 5 R152Q (455G>A) (4) 4253 af9; 43Gb0e;A (12) 6 571-1Gb0e;T (4) 29 4253 af9; 13Gb0e;A (12) R212H (635G>A) (16) 4354-38Gb0e;A (4) C230S (688T>A) (12) 30a 4466 af9; 3Gb0e;A (4) 641delG (9) 30b C1490Y (4469G>A) (17) 10 1240-14Cb0e;T (13) P1512R (4535C>G) (4) H423R (1268b0e;G) (13) 31 T1526M (4577C>T) (14) 1357 af9; 11delG (16) 33/34 A1598D (4793C>A) (4) H423H (1269Cb0e;T) (13) 35 4947delC (14) 11 1387delTT (4) 5018 d19; 2T>C (7) R500R (1500Gb0e;A) (4) 39 H1838Y (5512C>T) (14) 12 L541P (1622T>C) (14) 40 N1868I (5603Ab0e;T) (13) R572Q (1715G>A) (17) L1894L (5682Gb0e;C) (15) 13 Y639X (1917C>G) (17) 5714 d19; 5G>A C641S (1922G>C) (4) 41 L1938L (5814Ab0e;G) (12) 14 R653C (1957C>T) (12) 42 5836-43Cb0e;A W700X (2099G>A) (4) 5836-11Gb0e;A (15) 3607 af9; 49Tb0e;C P1948I (5843Cb0e;T) (15) 15 V767D (2300T>A) (7) P1948P (5844Ab0e;G) (15) 16 W821R (2461T>A) (14) G1961E (5882G>A) (14) 17 2588-33Cb0e;Tb 43 L1970F (5908C>T) (11) G863A (2588G>C) (17) 44 6006-16Ab0e;G (16) 18 2654-36Cb0e;T (4) I2023I (6069Cb0e;T) (14) T897I (2690C>T) (7) L2027F (6079C>T) (14) 19 R943Q (2828Gb0e;A) (13) 45 V2050L (6148G>C) (14) Y954D (2860T>G) (4) 46 R2107H (6320G>A) (18) N965S (2894A>G) (14) 6386 d19; 2G>C (10) 20 G978D (2933G>A) (4) 47 R2139W (6415C>T) (14) L988L (2964Cb0e;T) (4) R2149L (6446G>T) (4) 21 E1022K (3064G>A) (4) C2150Y (6449G>A) (19) A1038V (3113C>T) (14) 48 D2177N (6529G>A) (17) G1050D (3149G>A) (4) L2241V (6721C>G) (12) 3211_3212insGT (14) 6729 af9; 21Cb0e;T (15) 22 E1087K (3259G>A) (14) 49 6730-3Tb0e;C (15) R1098C (3292C>T) (12) S2255I (6764Gb0e;T) (13) S1099P (3295T>C) (4) 6816 af9; 28Gb0e;C (4) R1108C (3322C>T) (14) R1129L (3386G>T) (17) a Bold indicates disease-causing mutations. Login to comment

[hide] A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in th... Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct;67(4):800-13. Epub 2000 Aug 24. Rivera A, White K, Stohr H, Steiner K, Hemmrich N, Grimm T, Jurklies B, Lorenz B, Scholl HP, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Weber BH
A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene in Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct;67(4):800-13. Epub 2000 Aug 24., [PMID:10958763]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease (STGD) is a common autosomal recessive maculopathy of early and young-adult onset and is caused by alterations in the gene encoding the photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter (ABCA4). We have studied 144 patients with STGD and 220 unaffected individuals ascertained from the German population, to complete a comprehensive, population-specific survey of the sequence variation in the ABCA4 gene. In addition, we have assessed the proposed role for ABCA4 in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a common cause of late-onset blindness, by studying 200 affected individuals with late-stage disease. Using a screening strategy based primarily on denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, we have identified in the three study groups a total of 127 unique alterations, of which 90 have not been previously reported, and have classified 72 as probable pathogenic mutations. Of the 288 STGD chromosomes studied, mutations were identified in 166, resulting in a detection rate of approximately 58%. Eight different alleles account for 61% of the identified disease alleles, and at least one of these, the L541P-A1038V complex allele, appears to be a founder mutation in the German population. When the group with AMD and the control group were analyzed with the same methodology, 18 patients with AMD and 12 controls were found to harbor possible disease-associated alterations. This represents no significant difference between the two groups; however, for detection of modest effects of rare alleles in complex diseases, the analysis of larger cohorts of patients may be required.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
80 Nucleotide alterations occurring in sim- Table 2 ABCA4 Mutations Found in Patients with STGD and AMD and in Controls EXON AND NUCLEOTIDE CHANGE EFFECT NO. OF ALLELES REFERENCE(S) STGD (288) AMD (400) Control (440) 3: 178GrA A60T 1 0 0 This study 179CrT A60E 1 0 0 This study 194GrA G65E 1 0 0 Fishman et al. (1999) 203CrT P68L 1 0 0 This study 214GrA G72R 1 0 0 This study 296insA Frameshift 2 0 0 This study 5: 454CrT R152X 1 0 0 This study 6: 634CrT R212C 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 688TrA C230S 1 0 0 This study 730delCT Frameshift 1 0 0 This study 740ArG N247S 1 0 0 This study 768GrT Splice 2 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 8: 983ArT E328V 1a 0 0 This study 1086TrA Y362X 1 0 0 This study 10: 1317GrA W438X 1 0 0 This study 11: 1411GrA E471K 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 12: 1622TrC L541P 21a 1a 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 1715GrA R572Q 1a 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 13: 1819GrA G607R 1 0 0 This study 1903CrA Q635K 2a 0 0 This study 1903CrT Q635X 1 0 0 This study IVS13ϩ1GrA Splice 2 0 0 This study 14: 1957CrT R653C 1 0 0 This study 1988GrA W663X 1 0 0 This study 2041CrT R681X 4 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 15: 2291GrA C764Y 1 0 0 This study 2292delT Frameshift 1a 0 0 This study 2295TrG S765R 1a 0 0 This study 16: 2564GrA W855X 1 0 0 Nasonkin et al. (1998) 17: 2588GrC Spliceb 17a 6 5 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Cremers et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999), Papaioannou et al. (2000) 18: 2701ArG T901A 0 2 0 This study 2741ArG H914A 0 0 1 This study 19: 2876CrT T959I 1 0 0 This study 20: IVS20ϩ5GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 21: 3106GrA E1036K 1a 0 0 Nasonkin et al. (1998) 3113CrT A1038V 26a 4a 1 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Cremers et al. (1998), Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) T3187TrC S1063P 1 0 0 This study (Continued) 805 Table 2 Continued EXON AND NUCLEOTIDE CHANGE EFFECT NO. OF ALLELES REFERENCE(S) STGD (288) AMD (400) Control (440) 22: 3292CrT R1097C 1 0 0 This study 3322CrT R1108C 4 0 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999) 24: 3528insTGCA Frameshift 1 0 0 This study 25: 3808GrT E1270X 1 0 0 This study 27: 3898CrT R1300X 1 0 0 This study 28: IVS28ϩ5GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 4139CrT P1380L 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 4195GrA E1399K 2 0 0 This study 4234CrT Q1412X 4 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 29: 4289TrC L1430P 2 0 0 This study 4318TrG F1440V 1 0 0 This study 4328GrA R1443H 1 0 0 This study 30: 4457CrT P1486L 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 4463GrA C1488Y 1 0 0 This study 31: 4610CrT T1537M 1 0 0 This study 35: IVS35ϩ2TrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 36: 5065TrC S1689P 1 0 0 This study 5114GrT R1705L 1 0 0 This study IVS36ϩ1GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 37: 5198TrC M1733T 0 0 1 This study 5242GrA G1748R 1 0 0 This study 5248CrT Q1750X 1 0 0 This study 5288TrC L1763P 1 0 0 This study 38: IVS38ϩ1GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 40: 5653GrA E1885K 1 0 0 This study 5693GrA R1898H 5 2 1 Allikmets et al. (1997b), Lewis et al. (1999) IVS40ϩ5GrA Splice 8a 0 0 Cremers et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 42: 5882GrA G1961E 34 4 2 Allikmets et al. (1997b), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 43: 5917delG Frameshift 3 0 0 This study 5923GrC G1975R 1 0 0 This study 5929GrA G1977S 1 0 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999) 45: 6229CrG R2077G 1 0 0 This study 6229CrT R2077W 1 0 0 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999) 48: 6609CrA Y2203X 2 0 0 This study 6647GrT A2216V 0 0 1 This study a Mutation pairs occurring on a single haplotype. Login to comment

[hide] Detection rate of pathogenic mutations in ABCA4 us... Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;130(11):1486-90. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1697. Downes SM, Packham E, Cranston T, Clouston P, Seller A, Nemeth AH
Detection rate of pathogenic mutations in ABCA4 using direct sequencing: clinical and research implications.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;130(11):1486-90. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1697., [PMID:23143460]

Abstract [show]

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
30 In 3 of the 6 patients with a historical diagnosis Table. Results From Direct Sequencing of the ABCA4 Gene in 50 Patients (continued) Subject No. Change 1 Change 2 Phase Segregation Age at Onset, y Phenotype Grade, Macula Flecks/ Cones/Rodsa Additional Variants Conclusion Nucleotide Amino Acid Nucleotide Amino Acid 11 4139Cb0e;T P1380L 5714 af9; 5Gb0e;A Splice NK NK 19 STGD m/0/0 0 2 PVs 12 4457Cb0e;T P1486L 4457Cb0e;T P1486L In trans Unaffected sibling carries 1 mutation 25 STGD maf9;af9;/1/1 0 2 PVs 13 4537dupC Q1513fs 6391Gb0e;A E2131K In trans Unaffected parents carriers 10 STGD maf9;/0/0 R152Q in cis with Q1513fs, E2131K in cis with E471K 2 PVs 14 6079Cb0e;T L2027F 6079Cb0e;T L2027F In trans Unaffected sibling carrier 28 STGD maf9;af9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 15 5018 af9; 2Tb0e;C NA 6316Cb0e;T R2106C In trans Affected sibling with same mutations 17 STGD m/0/1 0 2 PVs 16 3004Cb0e;T R1002Wb 1957Cb0e;T R653C In trans NK 16 STGD m/0/1 0 2 PVs 17 1253Tb0e;C F418S 2588Gb0e;C G863A NK NK 52 STGD maf9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 18 6709Ab0e;C T2237Pb 3064Gb0e;A E1022K In trans 2 Affected siblings with same mutations 6 STGD maf9;af9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 19 5260Tb0e;G Y1754D 4469Gb0e;A C1490Y In trans NK 12 STGD maf9;af9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 20 551Cb0e;T S184Fb 4793Cb0e;A A1598D NK 2 Affected siblings with same mutations 58 STGD m/NP/NP 0 2 PVs 21 550-551TCb0e;CG S184Rb 5882Gb0e;A G1961E In trans Affected sibling with same mutations 25 STGD maf9;af9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 22 5313-3Cb0e;G Spliceb 5882Gb0e;A G1961E In trans Unaffected parents carriers 47 STGD m/0/1 0 2 PVs 23 2588Gb0e;C G863A 5461-10Tb0e;C Disease-associated allele, unknown mechanism In trans NA 26 STGD maf9;af9;/3/1 1 In cis with G863A 2 PVs 24 5537Tb0e;C I1846T 5461-10Tb0e;C Disease-associated allele, unknown mechanism In trans Unaffected son carries I1846T only 17 STGD maf9;af9;/3/3 0 2 PVs 25 6089Gb0e;A R2030Q 5461-10Tb0e;C Disease-associated allele, unknown mechanism In trans Unaffected sibling carries R2030Q 4 STGD m/NP/NP 0 2 PVs 26 6730-1Gb0e;C Spliceb 2588Gb0e;C G863A NK NK 15 STGD NP/NP/NP 0 2 PVs 27 3291Ab0e;T R1097Sb 3056Cb0e;T T1019M In trans NK 9 STGD NP/NP/NP 1 In cis with R1097S 2 PVs 28 498delT L167HisfsX2b Not present NA NA NK 28 STGD m/1/1 0 1 PV 29 2345Gb0e;A W782Xb Not present NA NA Unaffected mother carries mutation 25 STGD m/1/1 0 1 PV 30 2588Gb0e;C G863A 4326Cb0e;A N1442K NK NK 36 STGD maf9;/0/0 0 1 PV af9; N1442K (unlikely) 31 2966Tb0e;C V989A Not present NA NA NK 49 STGD m/1/1 0 1 PV (continued) ARCH OPHTHALMOL/VOL 130 (NO. 11), NOV 2012 WWW.ARCHOPHTHALMOL.COM 1487 (c)2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: http://archopht.jamanetwork.com/ by a Semmelweis University Budapest User on 12/06/2015 lopathy is genetically heterogeneous. A total of 10 novel mutations were identified (Table). Login to comment

[hide] A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinica... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15. Fujinami K, Lois N, Davidson AE, Mackay DS, Hogg CR, Stone EM, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Bunce C, Robson AG, Moore AT, Webster AR, Holder GE, Michaelides M
A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinical and electrophysiologic assessment, progression, and genotype correlations.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15., [PMID:23499370]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic natural history of Stargardt disease and correlate with the genotype. DESIGN: Cohort study of 59 patients. METHODS: Clinical history, examination, and electrophysiologic assessment were undertaken in a longitudinal survey. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on electrophysiologic findings, as previously published: Group 1 had dysfunction confined to the macula; Group 2 had macular and generalized cone system dysfunction; and Group 3 had macular and both generalized cone and rod system dysfunction. At baseline, there were 27 patients in Group 1, 17 in Group 2, and 15 in Group 3. Amplitude reduction of >50% in the relevant electroretinogram (ERG) component or a peak time shift of >3 ms for the 30 Hz flicker ERG or bright flash a-wave was considered clinically significant ERG deterioration. Molecular screening of ABCA4 was undertaken. RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 31.7 years, with the mean follow-up interval being 10.5 years. A total of 22% of patients from Group 1 showed ERG group transition during follow-up, with 11% progressing to Group 2 and 11% to Group 3. Forty-seven percent of patients in Group 2 progressed to Group 3. There was clinically significant ERG deterioration in 54% of all subjects: 22% of Group 1, 65% of Group 2, and 100% of Group 3. At least 1 disease-causing ABCA4 variant was identified in 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with initial rod ERG involvement demonstrated clinically significant electrophysiologic deterioration; only 20% of patients with normal full-field ERGs at baseline showed clinically significant progression. Such data assist counseling by providing more accurate prognostic information and are also highly relevant in the design, patient selection, and monitoring of potential therapeutic interventions.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
89 Clinical Data and Molecular Genetic Status of 59 Patients With Stargardt Disease Pt Onset (y) Age (y) logMAR VA Variants Identifieda BL FU BL FU 1 16 17 26 0.0/1.0 0.0/0.48 c.768G>T / p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg943Gln 2 15 17 25 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p. Arg1443His 3 11 18 27 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Trp439* / p.Gly863Ala / p.Leu1970Phe 4 19 21 32 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Leu2027Phe 5 10 22 30 0.48/0.48 1.0/0.78 p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg943Gln / c.5461-10 T>C 6 18 26 37 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Pro1380Phe 7 25 28 40 0.78/1.0 1.3/0.78 ND 8 24 29 38 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Phe418Ser / p.Leu2027Phe 9 24 31 44 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.0 c.4253&#fe;5 G>T / p.Gly1507Arg 10 26 32 44 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Cys1490Tyr / p.Arg2030Gln 11 31 34 46 0.18/0.3 0.6/0.7 ND 12 17 35 47 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Asn96His 13 23 35 45 1.0/0.3 1.0/0.48 p.Gly1513Profs*1554 14 33 37 48 0.18/1.48 1.0/1.3 ND 15 38 40 51 0.18/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Arg2107His 16 42 43 53 0.0/0.0 1.0/1.0 ND 17 22 48 59 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr 18 20 49 59 1.0/0.6 1.0/1.0 p.Pro1380Leu / p.Gly1961Glu 19 35 50 61 1.0/0.3 1.0/1.0 p.Arg1108Cys 20 25 56 67 1.3/0.18 1.0/1.0 p.Trp439* / p.Gly863Ala 21 48 59 71 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 p. Ile156 Val / p. Cys1455Arg / p. Phe1839Ser 22 21 22 31 0.3/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Arg2107His 23 21 23 33 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala 24 48 64 73 0.0/1.0 0.18/3.0 p.Tyr1652* 25 17 19 29 0.78/0.3 1.0/1.0 c.5461-10 T>C 26 17 21 33 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 ND 27 27 53 66 1.78/1.78 1.3/1.0 p.Ser1071Cysfs*1084 28 5 14 21 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Arg408* / p.Val675lle 29 9 15 27 1.08/1.08 1.0/1.0 p.Cys2150Tyr 30 14 24 32 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 ND 31 18 28 39 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg1108Cys / p.Arg943Gln 32 14 29 37 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Arg653Cys / p.Arg2030Gln 33 19 29 40 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.08 ND 34 34 40 49 0.3/0.48 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala / p.Glu1087Lys 35 25 43 54 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr / p.Gly863Ala 36 38 60 69 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.08 p.Val931Met / c.5461-10 T>C 37 10 11 20 1.0/0.78 1.3/1.3 p.Pro1380Leu 38 10 15 23 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.3 p.Ser1071Cysfs*1084 / p.Pro1380Leu 39 24 25 38 1.56/0.3 2.0/2.0 c.5461-10 T>C / c.5714&#fe;5 G>A 40 18 26 36 1.3/1.3 2.0/1.3 ND 41 32 33 45 0.48/0.48 1.0/1.0 ND 42 32 35 46 1.3/0.0 3.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr 43 30 35 45 0.48/0.48 2.0/1.3 ND 44 15 41 49 1.3/1.3 2.0/1.3 p.Asn965Ser 45 8 8 20 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Thr1019Met 46 10 11 23 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Thr1019Met 47 8 12 24 2.0/1.56 1.78/1.48 p.Cys2150Tyr 48 17 18 26 1.0/0.78 1.3/1.0 c.5461-10 T>C / p.Leu2027Phe 49 8 21 33 1.3/1.3 2.0/2.0 p.Asp574Aspfs*582 50 8 27 39 2.0/1.56 1.78/1.48 c.5461-10 T>C 51 24 31 43 1.18/1.18 1.08/1.3 p.Arg1640Trp / p.Leu2027Phe Continued on next page respective electrophysiologic traces appear in Figure 2. Login to comment

[hide] Exome sequencing of 47 chinese families with cone-... PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e65546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065546. Print 2013. Huang L, Zhang Q, Li S, Guan L, Xiao X, Zhang J, Jia X, Sun W, Zhu Z, Gao Y, Yin Y, Wang P, Guo X, Wang J, Zhang Q
Exome sequencing of 47 chinese families with cone-rod dystrophy: mutations in 25 known causative genes.
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e65546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065546. Print 2013., [PMID:23776498]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to identify mutations in 25 known causative genes in 47 unrelated Chinese families with cone-rod dystrophy (CORD). METHODS: Forty-seven probands from unrelated families with CORD were recruited. Genomic DNA prepared from leukocytes was analyzed by whole exome sequencing. Variants in the 25 genes were selected and then validated by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Fourteen potential pathogenic mutations, including nine novel and five known, were identified in 10 of the 47 families (21.28%). Homozygous, compound heterozygous, and hemizygous mutations were detected in three, four, or three families, respectively. The 14 mutations in the 10 families were distributed among CNGB3 (three families), PDE6C (two families), ABCA4 (one family), RPGRIP1 (one family), RPGR (two families), and CACNA1F (one family). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a brief view on mutation spectrum of the 25 genes in a Chinese cohort with CORD. Identification of novel mutations enriched our understanding of variations in these genes and their associated phenotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first systemic exome-sequencing analysis of all of the 25 CORD-associated genes.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
75 Family ID Gene Variations Status Bioinformation analysis Allele frequency in Reference DNA Protein SIFT Polyphen-2 Splice Phastcons _score patients controls Family 1 ABCA4 c.4604dup p.T1537Nfs*18 hetero - - - 0.997 1/94 0/384 novel Family 1 ABCA4 c.1957C.T p.R653C hetero D PD - 1.000 1/94 NA [38] Family 2 CNGB3 c.1774dup p.E592Gfs*44 homo - - - 1.000 2/94 0/384 novel Family 3 CNGB3 c.129+1G.A - homo - - DSA 1.000 2/94 0/384 novel Family 4 CNGB3 c.2415A.C p.E805D hetero D PD - 1.000 1/94 NA rs186448979# Family 4 CNGB3 c.1957G.A p.A653T hetero tolerated benign - 0.000 1/94 0/384 novel Family 5 PDE6C c.1935+1del - hetero - - DSA 1.000 1/94 0/384 novel Family 5 PDE6C c.2518+5G.C NA hetero - - DSA 0.112 1/94 0/384 novel Family 6 PDE6C c.1004+1G.A - homo - - DSA 1.000 2/94 0/384 novel Family 7 RPGRIP1 c.2592T.G p.Y864* hetero - - - 0.994 1/94 0/384 novel Family 7 RPGRIP1 c.799C.T p.R267* hetero - - - 1.000 1/94 NA [36] Family 8 CACNA1F c.2542G.A p.G848S hemi tolerated benign - 1.000 1/94 0/384 novel Family 9 RPGR c.785C.G p.A262G hemi tolerated benign - 0.002 1/94 NA [39] Family10 RPGR c.2447_2461del p.G816_E820del hemi - - - NA 1/94 NA [40] Note: D = damaging; PD = probably damaging; DSA = donor site abolished. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disea... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003. Fujinami K, Sergouniotis PI, Davidson AE, Wright G, Chana RK, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Egan CA, Robson AG, Moore AT, Holder GE, Michaelides M, Webster AR
Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disease with preserved foveal structure and function.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003., [PMID:23953153]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease who show a foveal-sparing phenotype. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The foveal-sparing phenotype was defined as foveal preservation on autofluorescence imaging, despite a retinopathy otherwise consistent with Stargardt disease. Forty such individuals were ascertained and a full ophthalmic examination was undertaken. Following mutation screening of ABCA4, the molecular findings were compared with those of patients with Stargardt disease but no foveal sparing. RESULTS: The median age of onset and age at examination of 40 patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype were 43.5 and 46.5 years. The median logMAR visual acuity was 0.18. Twenty-two patients (22/40, 55%) had patchy parafoveal atrophy and flecks; 8 (20%) had numerous flecks at the posterior pole without atrophy; 7 (17.5%) had mottled retinal pigment epithelial changes; 2 (5%) had multiple atrophic lesions, extending beyond the arcades; and 1 (2.5%) had a bull's-eye appearance. The median central foveal thickness assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images was 183.0 mum (n = 33), with outer retinal tubulation observed in 15 (45%). Twenty-two of 33 subjects (67%) had electrophysiological evidence of macular dysfunction without generalized retinal dysfunction. Disease-causing variants were found in 31 patients (31/40, 78%). There was a higher prevalence of the variant p.Arg2030Gln in the cohort with foveal sparing compared to the group with foveal atrophy (6.45% vs 1.07%). CONCLUSIONS: The distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype are described. The presence of 2 distinct phenotypes of Stargardt disease (foveal sparing and foveal atrophy) suggests that there may be more than 1 disease mechanism in ABCA4 retinopathy.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
47 6089 G>A, p.Arg2030Gln/c.6118 C>T, p.Arg2040*] 8 39 44 0.1 0.1 4 297 230 U 3 A A NA NA [c.71 G>A, p.Arg24His/c.4577 C>T, p. Thr1526Met] 9 35* 35 0.18 0.18 2 142 154 3 ND ND NA NA [c.658 C>T, p.p.Arg220Cys/c.2588 G>C, p. Gly863Ala] 10 45 54 0.48 0.18 1 102 116 3 ND A NA NA [c.1957 C>T, p.Arg653Cys/c.5693 G>A, p.Arg1898His] 11 43 43 0.1 0 2 170 185 1 A A 2 2 [c.2588 G>C, p. Gly863Ala/c.4139 C>T, p.Ala1038Val] 12 36** 38 0.3 0 1 220 212 U 1 A A 1 1 [c.4139 C>T, p.Ala1038Val/c.4594 G>T, p.Asp1532Asn] 13 62 68 0.1 0.48 1 196 189 U 1 N N 2 2 [c.4222 T>C, p.Trp1408Arg/c.4918 C>T, p.Arg1640Trp] 14 36 44 0.48 0.48 3 79 89 1 A A NA NA [c.4222 T>C, p.Trp1408Arg/c.4918 C>T, p.Arg1640Trp] 15 46* 46 0.1 0.1 3 NA NA 1 A A NA NA [c.4469 G>A, p.Cys1490Tyr/c. Login to comment
48 6089 G>A, p.Arg2030Gln] 16 44* 44 0.18 0 2 NA NA 1 A A NA NA [c.6079 C>T, p.Leu2027Phe/c.6079 C>T, p.Leu2027Phe] 17 48 73 0.18 3 4 135 86 U 2 A ND NA NA [c.4956 T>G, p.Tyr1652*] 18 56 57 0 0 2 254 273 1 ND A NA NA [c.5018&#fe;2 T>C, Splice site] 19 53* 53 0.48 0.18 1 137 133 1 A A NA NA [c.5461-10 T>C, Splice site] 20 49 58 0.18 0 1 256 222 U 1 A N 1 1 [c.5461-10 T>C, Splice site] 21 47** 47 0.3 0.3 1 239 202 U 1 A A 1 1 [c.1805 G>A, p.Arg602Gln] 22 50* 50 0.48 0.18 1 263 261 U 1 N N NA NA [c.1957 C>T, p.Arg653Cys] 23 39* 39 0 0.1 2 225 228 1 N N NA NA [c.2588 G>C, p. Gly863Ala] 24 55 57 0.48 0.48 1 117 74 1 ND ND NA NA [c.3602 T>G, p.Leu1201Arg] 25 50 54 0.48 0.18 1 147 144 U 3 ND ND NA NA [c.3602 T>G, p.Leu1201Arg] 26 43 47 2 0.18 1 70 52 1 ND ND NA NA [c.4319 T>C, p.Phe1440Ser] 27 30 51 0.3 0.3 1 75 79 U 3 A A NA NA [c.4685 T>C, p.Ile1562Thr] 28 29 34 0.18 0.18 3 132 107 1 A A NA NA [c.4926 C>G, p.Ser1642Arg] 29 52* 52 0.18 0.18 3 180 200 1 ND ND 2 2 [c.5882 G>A, p.Gly1961Glu] 30 28 28 0.1 0.1 2 NA NA 1 N ND NA NA [c.6079 C>T, p.Leu2027Phe] 31 40* 40 0.1 0.1 2 222 223 U NA NA NA NA NA [c.6079 C>T, p.Leu2027Phe] 32 45 48 0.18 3 1 237 252 U NA NA NA NA NA NA Continued on next page Tartu, Estonia) in all probands.43 The term ''variants`` used herein includes those sequence changes previously shown to be enriched in patients with Stargardt disease from prior studies. Login to comment
126 Index (0-1) Pred. Hum Var Score (0-1) Site Affected Wt CV Mt CV CV % Variation 2 c.71G>A, p.Arg24His 1 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.98 No change ND 6 c.768G>T, Splice site 1 Het Klevering20 Tol. 0.56 NA Donor 70.4 58 Site broken (17.51) ND 6 c.658C>T, p.Arg220Cys 1 Het Webster53 Tol. NA Benign 0.39 No change ND 11 c.1411G>A, p.Glu471Lys 1 Het Allikmets46 Tol NA Benign 0.01 Acceptor 71.7 43 Site broken (40.4) 11/13006 db SNP (rs1800548) 12 c.1622T>C, p.Leu541Pro 1 Het Fishman8 Intol. 0.00 PRD 0.961 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs61751392) Int 12 c.1760&#fe;1G>T, Splice site 1 Het This study NA NA Donor 84.6 58 WT site broken (31.72) ND 13 c.1805G>A, p.Arg602Gln 2 Het Webster53 Tol. NA PRD 0.513 48.9 78 New site (&#fe;59.14) 2/13006 db SNP (rs61749410) 14 c.1957C>T, p.Arg653Cys 2 Het Rivera49 Tol. 0.10 PRD 0.999 No change ND 17 c. Login to comment
141 Allele Frequencies of 72 ABCA4 Variants Identified in a Comparison Groupa With the Typical Stargardt Disease (140 Patients Without Evidence of Foveal Sparing on Autofluorescence Imaging) Exon Nucleotide Substitution and Amino Acid Change Number of Alleles Allele Frequency 2 c.71G>A, p.Arg24His 1 0.36% 2 c.161G>A, p.Cys54Tyr 3 1.07% 3 c.223T>G, p.Cys75Gly 1 0.36% 5 c.455G>A, p.Arg152Gln 1 0.36% 5 c.454C>T, p.Arg152* 1 0.36% 5 c.466 A>G, p.Ile156Val 2 0.71% 6 c.634C>T, p. Arg212Cys 3 1.07% 6 c.656G>C, p.Arg219Thr 1 0.36% 6 c.666_678delAAAGACGGTGCGC, p.Lys223_Arg226delfs 2 0.71% 6 c.768G>T, Splicing site 4 1.42% 8 c.1037A>C, p.Lys346Thr 1 0.36% 10 c.1222C>T, p.Arg408* 3 1.07% 12 c.1622T>C, p.Leu541Pro 2 0.71% 12 c.1648 G>T, p.Gly550* 1 0.36% 13 c.1804C>T, p.Arg602Trp 1 0.36% 13 c.1817G>A, p.Gly606Asp 1 0.36% 13 c.1922G>C, p.Cys641Ser 1 0.36% Int 13 c.1937&#fe;1G>A, Splicing site 2 0.71% 14 c.1957C>T, p.Arg653Cys 2 0.71% 17 c.2588G>C, p.Gly863Ala 19 6.79% 18 c.2701A>G, p.Thr901Ala 1 0.36% 19 c.2791G>A, p.Val931Met 2 0.71% 19 c.2894A>G, p.Asn965Ser 1 0.36% 20 c.2966T>C, p.Vla989Ala 3 1.07% 20 c.2971G>C, p.Gly991Arg 2 0.71% 21 c.3056C>T, p.Thr1019Met 1 0.36% 21 c.3113C>T, p.Ala1038Val 3 1.07% 21 c.3064G>A, p.Glu1022Lys 2 0.71% 22 c.3211_3212insGT, p.Ser1071Cysfs 6 2.14% 22 c.3259G>A, p.Glu1087Lys 4 1.43% 22 c.3292C>T, p.Arg1098Cys 1 0.36% 22 c.3322C>T, p.Arg1108Cys 5 1.79% 22 c.3323G>A, p.Arg1108His 1 0.36% 23 c.3364G>A, p.Glu1122Lys 1 0.36% 23 c.3386G>A, p.Arg1129His 1 0.36% 24 c.3602T>G, p.Leu1201Arg 3 1.07% 27 c.3898C>T, p.Arg1300* 2 0.71% 28 c.4139C>T, p.Pro1380Leu 14 5.00% 28 c.4222T>C, p.Trp1408Arg 1 0.36% 28 c.4234C>T, p.Gly1412* 1 0.36% 28 c.4253&#fe;5G>T, Splice site 1 0.36% 28 c.4253&#fe;4C>T, Splice site 1 0.36% 29 c.4283C>T, p.Thr1428Met 1 0.36% 29 c.4319T>C, p.Phe1440Ser 1 0.36% 29 c.4462T>C, p.Cys1488Arg 1 0.36% 30 c.4469G>A, p.Cys1490Tyr 5 1.79% 30 c.4537_4538insC, p.Gly1513Profs 1 0.36% 31 c.4577C>T, p.Thr1526Met 2 0.71% 33 c.4715C>T, p.Thr1572Met 1 0.36% Continued on next page TABLE 3. Login to comment

[hide] ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570. Fujinami K, Zernant J, Chana RK, Wright GA, Tsunoda K, Ozawa Y, Tsubota K, Webster AR, Moore AT, Allikmets R, Michaelides M
ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing in a British cohort.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570., [PMID:23982839]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We applied a recently reported next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy for screening the ABCA4 gene in a British cohort with ABCA4-associated disease and report novel mutations. METHODS: We identified 79 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ABCA4-associated disease who had a single variant identified by the ABCA4 microarray. Comprehensive phenotypic data were obtained, and the NGS strategy was applied to identify the second allele by means of sequencing the entire coding region and adjacent intronic sequences of the ABCA4 gene. Identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and assessed for pathogenicity by in silico analysis. RESULTS: Of the 42 variants detected by prescreening with the microarray, in silico analysis suggested that 34, found in 66 subjects, were disease-causing and 8, found in 13 subjects, were benign variants. We detected 42 variants by NGS, of which 39 were classified as disease-causing. Of these 39 variants, 31 were novel, including 16 missense, 7 splice-site-altering, 4 nonsense, 1 in-frame deletion, and 3 frameshift variants. Two or more disease-causing variants were confirmed in 37 (47%) of 79 patients, one disease-causing variant in 36 (46%) subjects, and no disease-causing variant in 6 (7%) individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the NGS platform for ABCA4 screening enabled detection of the second disease-associated allele in approximately half of the patients in a British cohort where one mutation had been detected with the arrayed primer extension (APEX) array. The time- and cost-efficient NGS strategy is useful in screening large cohorts, which will be increasingly valuable with the advent of ABCA4-directed therapies.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
55 1 c.161G>A p.C54Y DC c.2297G>T p.G766V DC 2 2 c.223T>G p.C75G DC c.5088C>G p.S1696R DC 2 3 c.740A>C p.N247T DC c.1433T>C p.I478T B c.2345G>A p.W782* DC 2 4 c.768G>T Splice site DC 1 5 c.1222C>T p.R408* DC c.2568C>A p.Y856* DC 2 6 c.1804C>T p.R602W DC c.859-9T>C Splice site PDC 2 7 c.1805G>A p.R602Q DC c.5113C>T p.R1705W DC 2 8 c.1922G>C p.C641S DC 1 9 c.1957C>T p.R653C DC 1 10 c.1957C>T p.R653C DC 1 11 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.655A>T p.R219* DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R219*) was APEX-false-negative 12 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 13 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 14 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC 1 15 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC 1 16 c.2894A>G p.N965S DC c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R1108C) was APEX-false-negative 17 c.3064G>A p.E1022K DC c.6729&#fe;4_&#fe;18delAGTTGGCCCTGGGGC Splice site DC 2 18 c.3064G>A p.E1022K DC 1 19 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.2942C>T p.P981L DC c.6529G>A p.D2177N B 2 20 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.1519G>T p.D507Y DC 2 21 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.4634G>A p.S1545N DC 2 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC 1 23 c.3292C>T p.R1098C DC c.3299T>A p.I1100N DC 2 24 c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC c.4978delC p.L1661* DC 2 25 c.3386G>A p.R1129H DC c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.4634G>A p.S1545N DC 3 Allele 2 (p.S1071fs) was APEX false-negative and allele 1 (p.R1129H) was NGS false-negative 26 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.3191-1G>T Splice site DC 2 27 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.3398T>C p.I1133T PDC 2 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.4070C>A p.A1357E DC 2 29 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.4773G>C Splice site DC 2 30 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 31 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 32 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 33 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* DC 1 34 c.4319T>C p.F1440S DC 1 35 c.4328G>A p.R1443H DC c.180delG p.M61fs DC 2 36 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y DC c.1726G>C p.D576H DC 2 37 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y DC 1 38 c.4537_4538insC p.Q1513fs DC c.5578C>T p.R1860W DC 2 Allele 1 (p.Q1513fs) was NGS-false-negative 39 c.4577C>T p.T1526M DC 1 T ABLE 2. Continued Pt Allele 1 Detected by APEX Allele 2 Detected by NGS Allele 3 Detected by NGS Total N of DC Variants Comments DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. Login to comment
62 Hum Var Score (0-1) Site Wt CV Mt CV CV % Variation 3 c.161G>A p.C54Y 1 1 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.11 PRD 0.994 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs150774447) 3 c.223T>G p.C75G 1 2 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. NA POD 0.603 No change ND 5 c.466A>G p.I156V 2 77, 78 [ [ Papaioannou M, et al. 16 Tol. 0.46 B 0.003 No change 16/13006 db SNP (rs112467008) Benign 6 c.655A>T p.R219* 1 11 [ Xi Q, et al. 27 ND 6 c.740A>C p.N247T 1 3 [ [ APEX Del. NA B 0.135 No change ND 6 c.768G>T Splice site 1 4 [ [ Klevering BJ, et al. 22 Tol. 0.56 NA Don. 70.4 58 Site broken (17.51) ND 9 c.1222C>T p.R408* 1 5 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 ND 12 c.1726G>C p.D576H 1 36 [ Downs K, et al. 25 POD 0.688 Acc. 68.1 39.1 Site broken (42.54) 1/13006 13 c.1804C>T p.R602W 1 6 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 B 0.129 No change ND db SNP (rs 6179409) 13 c.1805G>A p.R602Q 1 7 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.04 PRD 0.513 Acc. 48.9 77.9 New site (&#fe;59.14) 2/13006 db SNP (rs61749410) 13 c.1906C>T p.Q636* 3 12, 13, 60 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs145961131) 13 c.1922G>C p.C641S 1 8 [ [ Stenirri S, et al. 24 Del. 0.00 No change ND db SNP (rs61749416) 14 c.1957C>T p.R653C 2 9, 10 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.999 No change ND db SNP (rs61749420) 17 c.2588G>C p.G863A/ p.DelG863 5 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 / Maugeri A, et al. 29 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.996 No change 68/13006 db SNP (rs76157638) 18 c.2701A>G p.T901A 1 74 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.82 B 0.008 23/13006 db SNP (rs139655975) Benign 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S 1 16 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.03 PRD 0.981 Acc. 53.4 82.3 New site (&#fe;54.26) ND db SNP (rs201471607) 20 c.2971G>C p.G991R 1 67 [ [ Yatsenko AN, et al. 13 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 28/13006 db SNP (rs147484266) Benign 22 c.3064G>A p.E1022K 2 17, 18 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.00 PRD 1.000 No change ND db SNP (rs61749459) 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs 5 19, 20, 21, 22, 25 [ [ APEX ND False-negative in APEX in patient 25 22 c.3292C>T p.R1098C 1 23 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. NA PRD 0.999 No change ND 22 c.3322C>T p.R1108C 3 16, 24, 61 [ [ Rozet JM, et al. 10 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.986 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs61750120) False-negative in APEX in patients 16 and 61 23 c.3386G>A p.R1129H 1 25 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 PRD 0.989 No change ND False-negative in NGS in patient 25 24 c.3602T>G p.L1201R 4 72, 73, 74, 79 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.37 B 0.052 Don. 61.3 73.7 New site (20.08) 416/13006 db SNP (rs61750126) Benign 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L 7 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.01 B 0.377 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs61750130) 28 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* 1 33 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 ND db SNP (rs61750137) 29 c.4283C>T p.T1428M 1 76 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.15 B 0.010 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs1800549) Benign 29 c.4319T>C p.F1440S 1 34 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 POD 0.744 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750141) 29 c.4326C>A p.N1442K 1 64 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Tol. NA POD 0.374 No change ND 29 c.4328G>A p.R1443H 1 35 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 1/13006 dbSNP (rs61750142) IVS29 c.4352&#fe;1G>A Splice site 1 73 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Don. 82.3 55.4 WT site broken (32.62) ND 30 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y 2 36, 37 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.994 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751402) 30 c.4538A>G p.Q1513R 1 67 [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Tol. NA Benign 0.043 Acc. 91.7 62.8 Site broken (31.55) ND T ABLE 3. Continued Exon/ IVS Nucleotide Substitution Protein Change/ Effect N of Alleles Identified Pt Method Previous Report SIFT Polyphen 2 HSF Matrix Allele Freq. by EVS Reference Comment APEX NGS Pred. Tol. Index (0-1) Pred. Login to comment

[hide] Early-onset stargardt disease: phenotypic and geno... Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Oct 17. Lambertus S, van Huet RA, Bax NM, Hoefsloot LH, Cremers FP, Boon CJ, Klevering BJ, Hoyng CB
Early-onset stargardt disease: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Oct 17., [PMID:25444351]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: To describe the phenotype and genotype of patients with early-onset Stargardt disease. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one Stargardt patients with age at onset </=10 years. METHODS: We reviewed patient medical records for age at onset, medical history, initial symptoms, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (FA), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and full-field electroretinography (ffERG). The ABCA4 gene was screened for mutations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age at onset, BCVA, fundus appearance, FAF, FA, SD-OCT, ffERG, and presence of ABCA4 mutations. RESULTS: The mean age at onset was 7.2 years (range, 1-10). The median times to develop BCVA of 20/32, 20/80, 20/200, and 20/500 were 3, 5, 12, and 23 years, respectively. Initial ophthalmoscopy in 41 patients revealed either no abnormalities or foveal retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes in 10 and 9 patients, respectively; the other 22 patients had foveal atrophy, atrophic RPE lesions, and/or irregular yellow-white fundus flecks. On FA, there was a "dark choroid" in 21 out of 29 patients. In 14 out of 50 patients, foveal atrophy occurred before flecks developed. On FAF, there was centrifugal expansion of disseminated atrophic spots, which progressed to the eventual profound chorioretinal atrophy. Spectral-domain OCT revealed early photoreceptor damage followed by atrophy of the outer retina, RPE, and choroid. On ffERG in 26 patients, 15 had normal amplitudes, and 11 had reduced photopic and/or scotopic amplitudes at their first visit. We found no correlation between ffERG abnormalities and the rate of vision loss. Thirteen out of 25 patients had progressive ffERG abnormalities. Finally, genetic screening of 44 patients revealed >/=2 ABCA4 mutations in 37 patients and single heterozygous mutations in 7. CONCLUSIONS: In early-onset Stargardt, initial ophthalmoscopy can reveal no abnormalities or minor retinal abnormalities. Yellow-white flecks can be preceded by foveal atrophy and may be visible only on FAF. Although ffERG is insufficient for predicting the rate of vision loss, abnormalities can develop. Over time, visual acuity declines rapidly in parallel with progressive retinal degeneration, resulting in profound chorioretinal atrophy. Thus, early-onset Stargardt lies at the severe end of the spectrum of ABCA4-associated retinal phenotypes.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
137 11 13 16, 23, 32, 39 c.818G>A p.Trp273* 1 1 This study c.872C>T p.Pro291Leu 1 1 34 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro 2 2 1, 16, 32, 40 c.1822T>A p.Phe608Ile 4 5 1, 23 c.1957C>T p.Arg653Cys 1 1 32, 41 c.2588G>C p.Gly863Ala/p.DelGly863 3 4 16, 18, 23, 32, 42 c.2919-?_3328&#fe;?del p.Ser974_Gly1110delinsCys 2 2 23 c.2947A>G p.Thr983Ala 3 4 34 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val 2 2 16, 31, 32, 40, 43 c.3335C>A p.Thr1112Asn 1 1 23 c.3449G>A p.Cys1150Tyr 1 1 This study c.3813G>C p.Glu1271Asp 1 1 This study c.3874C>T p.Gln1292* 1 1 34 c.4224G>T p.Trp1408Cys 1 1 This study c.4462T>C p.Cys1488Arg 1 1 1, 8, 44, 45 c.4506C>A p.Cys1502* 1 1 34 c.4539&#fe;1G>T p.? Login to comment