ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Arg1640Trp

ClinVar:	c.4919G>A , p.Arg1640Gln ? , not provided c.4918C>T , p.Arg1640Trp ? , not provided
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (71%), C: D (71%), D: D (71%), E: D (71%), F: D (71%), G: D (66%), H: D (59%), I: D (71%), K: N (57%), L: D (71%), M: D (71%), N: N (53%), P: D (71%), Q: D (85%), S: D (53%), T: N (53%), V: D (71%), W: D (95%), Y: D (71%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: D, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Spectrum of ABCR gene mutations in autosomal reces... Eur J Hum Genet. 1998 May-Jun;6(3):291-5. Rozet JM, Gerber S, Souied E, Perrault I, Chatelin S, Ghazi I, Leowski C, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Kaplan J
Spectrum of ABCR gene mutations in autosomal recessive macular dystrophies.
Eur J Hum Genet. 1998 May-Jun;6(3):291-5., [PMID:9781034]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease (STGD) and late-onset fundus flavimaculatus (FFM) are autosomal recessive conditions leading to macular degenerations in childhood and adulthood, respectively. Recently, mutations of the photoreceptor cell-specific ATP binding transporter gene (ABCR) have been reported in Stargardt disease. Here, we report on the screening of the whole coding sequence of the ABCR gene in 40 unrelated STGD and 15 FFM families and we show that mutations truncating the ABCR protein consistently led to STGD. Conversely, all mutations identified in FFM were missense mutations affecting uncharged amino acids. These results provide the first genotype-phenotype correlations in ABCR gene mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
45 Furthermore, all ABCR missense mutations Table 1 Mutations in the ABCR gene in STGD and FFM families Conserved aa in: Nucleotide change Amino acid change Domain ABCs RmP Phenotype Families Comment (571-2)A®G splicing mutation STGD 1 HAD1 (1938-2)A®G splicing mutation STGD 1 (4668+2)T®C splicing mutation STGD 1 (4735+2)T®A splicing mutation STGD 1 del(5196+1-5196+6 splicing mutation STGD 1 LOZ2 2570 delT frameshift mutation STGD 1 3209insGT frameshift mutation STGD 2 CHE2 G3754T E1252X STGD 1 C3994T Q1332X STGD 1 C6337G I2113X STGD 1 JEG2 C52T R18W IC - + STGD 1 C634T R212C EC - + STGD 5 GEN2, JEG2 G1908T Q636H IC - + STGD 1 LOZ2 C3056T T1019M IC - + STGD 1 C3322T R1107C IC - + STGD 1 JUL2 C4916T R1640W IC + + STGD 2 MAR1 G5929A G1977S ATP2 + + STGD 1 GEN2 G6320A R2107H IC + + STGD 1 JUL2 C3114T A1038V IC - + STGD 2 CHE2 +FFM +1 VII2 T1622C L541P EC - + FFM 1 VII2 T31C L11P IC + + FFM 1 G3272A G1090E IC + + FFM 1 G4522T G1508C IC + + FFM 1 C5908T L1970F IC + + FFM 1 GON2 T5912G L1971R IC + + FFM 1 GON2 Mutations refer to the standard nomenclature. Login to comment

[hide] Foveal cavitation as an optical coherence tomograp... Retina. 2012 Jul;32(7):1411-9. Leng T, Marmor MF, Kellner U, Thompson DA, Renner AB, Moore W, Sowden JC
Foveal cavitation as an optical coherence tomography finding in central cone dysfunction.
Retina. 2012 Jul;32(7):1411-9., [PMID:22466470]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe a distinctive foveal cavitation as seen by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in certain cone dysfunction syndromes. METHODS: Observational case series. Patients were evaluated by dilated fundus examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, full-field electroretinogram, multifocal electroretinogram, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, color vision testing, fluorescein angiography, Goldmann visual field testing, and molecular genetic analysis. RESULTS: We present eight patients with foveal cavitation in association with presumed cone dysfunction. This was characterized on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography by a gap in the subfoveal outer segment layer without more diffuse retinal thinning. There were 5 patients of age 10 years to 27 years and 3 patients of age 49 years to 52 years, with a 1.5- to 38-year history of bilateral visual loss. A small foveal oval-shaped area of reduced foveal fundus autofluorescence, surrounded by increased fundus autofluorescence, was seen in the younger patients, and a broad circle of increased fundus autofluorescence in the older patients. The multifocal electroretinogram always showed central amplitude reduction, but there were varying degrees of cone dysfunction on full-field electroretinogram. There were mild abnormalities on desaturated color vision testing. The family history was noncontributory in all cases. None of the cases were congenital. ABCA4 gene mutations were identified in three of five patients tested; CNGB3 testing was negative in these patients. CONCLUSION: Cone dysfunction syndromes typically show retinal thinning on optical coherence tomography imaging, although several case reports have noted focal outer retinal loss. Our case series shows that a distinctive optical coherence tomography finding, foveal cavitation, may be a clue to cone dysfunction syndromes, but is not specific to any one hereditary disorder or age group.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
45 Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Foveal Outer Segment Cavitation Case Sex Age BCVA Duration of Symptoms (Years) FAF Color Dysfunction* ERG mfERG Genetic Testing OD OS ABCA4 CNGB3 1 F 27 20/150 20/150 2 Small oval of reduced FAF surrounded by increased FAF Mild Rods: normal Cones: normal Not done Not done Not done 2 F 10 20/100 20/80 2 Small oval of reduced FAF surrounded by increased FAF Mild Rods: normal Cones: reduced amplitudes and increased implicit times Reduced amplitude centrally One allele: c.4918C.T (p.Arg1640Trp) (heterozygous) No mutations 3 M 19 20/60 20/50 10 Small oval of reduced FAF Mild Rods: normal Cones: mild decrease in amplitude in OD, normal OS Reduced amplitude centrally No mutations Not done 4 F 16 20/50 20/50 1.5 Small oval of reduced FAF surrounded by increased FAF Mild Rods: normal Cones: normal. Login to comment

[hide] Stargardt macular dystrophy: common ABCA4 mutation... Mol Vis. 2012;18:280-9. Epub 2012 Feb 1. Roberts LJ, Nossek CA, Greenberg LJ, Ramesar RS
Stargardt macular dystrophy: common ABCA4 mutations in South Africa--establishment of a rapid genetic test and relating risk to patients.
Mol Vis. 2012;18:280-9. Epub 2012 Feb 1., [PMID:22328824]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Based on the previous indications of founder ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 4 gene (ABCA4) mutations in a South African subpopulation, the purpose was to devise a mechanism for identifying common disease-causing mutations in subjects with ABCA4-associated retinopathies (AARs). Facilitating patient access to this data and determining the frequencies of the mutations in the South African population would enhance the current molecular diagnostic service offered. METHODS: The majority of subjects in this study were of Caucasian ancestry and affected with Stargardt macular dystrophy. The initial cohort consisted of DNA samples from 181 patients, and was screened using the ABCR400 chip. An assay was then designed to screen a secondary cohort of 72 patients for seven of the most commonly occurring ABCA4 mutations in this population. A total of 269 control individuals were also screened for the seven ABCA4 mutations. RESULTS: Microarray screening results from a cohort of 181 patients affected with AARs revealed that seven ABCA4 mutations (p.Arg152*, c.768G>T, p.Arg602Trp, p.Gly863Ala, p.Cys1490Tyr, c.5461-10T>C, and p.Leu2027Phe) occurred at a relatively high frequency. The newly designed genetic assay identified two of the seven disease-associated mutations in 28/72 patients in a secondary patient cohort. In the control cohort, 12/269 individuals were found to be heterozygotes, resulting in an estimated background frequency of these mutations in this particular population of 4.46 per 100 individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively high detection rate of seven ABCA4 mutations in the primary patient cohort led to the design and subsequent utility of a multiplex assay. This assay can be used as a viable screening tool and to reduce costs and laboratory time. The estimated background frequency of the seven ABCA4 mutations, together with the improved diagnostic service, could be used by counselors to facilitate clinical and genetic management of South African families with AARs.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
139 of alleles detected Frequency p.Cys54Tyr c. 161 G>A 2 0.55% p.Arg152* c. 454 C>T 12 3.31% p.Arg152Gln c. 455 G>A 3 0.83% p.Gly172Ser c. 514 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg212Cys c. 634 C>T 1 0.28% p.Lys223Gln c. 667 A>C 1 0.28% p.V256V (Splice) c. 768 G>T 18 4.97% p.Pro291Leu c. 872 C>T 1 0.28% p.Trp439* c. 1317 G>A 1 0.28% p.Ala538Asp c. 1613 C>A 1 0.28% p.Leu541Pro c. 1622 T>C 1 0.28% p.Arg602Trp c. 1885C>T 30 8.29% p.Val643Met c. 1927 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg653Cys c. 1957 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg681* c. 2041 C>T 3 0.83% p.Val767Asp c. 2300 T>A 1 0.28% p.Trp855* c.2564_2571delGGTACCTT 2 0.55% p.Gly863Ala c. 2588 G>C 11 3.04% p.Val931Met c. 2791 G>A 1 0.28% p.Asn965Ser c. 2894 A>G 4 1.10% p.Val989Ala c. 2966 T>C 1 0.28% p.Gly991Arg c. 2971 G>C 1 0.28% p.Thr1019Met c. 3056 C>T 1 0.28% p.Ala1038Val c. 3113 C>T 3 0.83% p.Glu1087Lys c. 3259 G>A 1 0.28% p.Arg1108Cys c. 3322 C>T 2 0.55% p.Leu1201Arg c. 3602 T>G 4 1.10% p.Arg1300Gln c. 3899 G>A 4 1.10% p.Pro1380Leu c. 4139 C>T 3 0.83% p.Trp1408Arg c. 4222 T>C 1 0.28% - c. 4253+5G>A 1 0.28% p.Phe1440Ser c. 4319 T>C 1 0.28% p.Arg1443His c. 4328 G>A 1 0.28% p.Cys1490Tyr c.4469 G>A 54 14.92% p.Gln1513Pro fs*42 c. 4535 insC 1 0.28% p.Ala1598Asp c. 4793C>A 1 0.28% p.Arg1640Trp c. 4918 C>T 2 0.55% p.Ser1642Arg c. 4926 C>G 1 0.28% p.V1681_C1685del c. 5041 del15 1 0.28% - c. 5461-10T>C 24 6.63% - c. 5714+5 G>A 2 0.55% p.Pro1948Leu c. 5843 C>T 1 0.28% p.Gly1961Glu c. 5882 G>A 4 1.10% p.Leu2027Phe c.6079 C>T 30 8.29% p.Arg2030* c. 6088 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg2030Gln c. 6089 G>A 3 0.83% p.Arg2038Trp c. 6112 C>T 1 0.28% p.Arg2107His c. 6320 G>A 2 0.55% p.Arg2118Glu fs*27 c. 6352 delA 1 0.28% p.Cys2150Tyr c. 6449 G>A 1 0.28% p.Gln2220* c. 6658 C>T 1 0.28% p.Gly863Ala mutation, which appears to have a founder effect in the Netherlands [13,15], the results obtained from the current study are in agreement with September et al.`s conclusions [9]. Login to comment

[hide] Quantification of peripapillary sparing and macula... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 10;52(11):8006-15. Print 2011. Burke TR, Rhee DW, Smith RT, Tsang SH, Allikmets R, Chang S, Lazow MA, Hood DC, Greenstein VC
Quantification of peripapillary sparing and macular involvement in Stargardt disease (STGD1).
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 10;52(11):8006-15. Print 2011., [PMID:21873672]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To quantify and compare structure and function across the macula and peripapillary area in Stargardt disease (STGD1). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (27 eyes) and 12 age-similar controls (12 eyes) were studied. Patients were classified on the basis of full-field electroretinogram (ERG) results: Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) horizontal line scans were obtained through the fovea and peripapillary area. The thicknesses of the outer nuclear layer plus outer plexiform layer (ONL+), outer segment (OS), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) were measured through the fovea, and peripapillary areas from 1 degrees to 4 degrees temporal to the optic disc edge using a computer-aided, manual segmentation technique. Visual sensitivities in the central 10 degrees were assessed using microperimetry and related to retinal layer thicknesses. RESULTS: Compared to the central macula, the differences between controls and patients in ONL+, OS, and RPE layer thicknesses were less in the nasal and temporal macula. Relative sparing of the ONL+ and/or OS layers was detected in the nasal (i.e., peripapillary) macula in 8 of 13 patients with extramacular disease on FAF; relative functional sparing was also detected in this subgroup. All 14 patients with disease confined to the central macula, as detected on FAF, showed ONL+ and OS layer thinning in regions of normal RPE thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Relative peripapillary sparing was detected in STGD1 patients with extramacular disease on FAF. Photoreceptor thinning may precede RPE degeneration in STGD1.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
112 Summary of Clinical, Demographic, and Genetic Data Patient Sex Age at Exam (y) Eye VA BCEA 1 SD (deg 2 ) Eccentricity of PRL (deg) ERG Group FAF Abnormalities Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 3 Distribution Peripapillary Area 1 F 43 OS 20/20 0.73 0 II M - A1799D ND ND 2 M 30 OS 20/150 3.21 6 I M - T1253M G1961E ND 3 F 55 OD 20/30 1.82 0 I EM - G863A IVS28af9;5 Gb0e;T ND 4 M 44 OD 20/25 0.65 0 I M - E161K ND ND 5.1 F 24 OD 20/200 1.57 1 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 5.2 F 22 OD 20/30 2.74 1 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 6.1 F 21 OD 20/150 2.01 1 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 6.2 F 18 OS 20/100 3.09 4 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 7 F 27 OS 20/400 2.97 9* II EM Peripapillary atrophy L2027F G851D ND 8 M 34 OS 20/100 2.16 4 I M - G1961E G1961E ND 9 M 20 OS 20/150 2.77 4 I M - IVS20af9;5 Gb0e;A G1961E ND 10 F 23 OS 20/150 9.05 5 I M - L541P/A1038V I1846T ND 11 M 59 OS 20/100 6.52 10 II EM - P1380L S1696N ND 12 M 49 OD 20/150 9.97 1 I EM Nasalaf9;temporal flecks R1108H P1380L ND 13 M 47 OS 20/80 5.62 7 I EM - G863A Y106X ND 14 F 42 OD 20/200 9.53 9 I EM Temporal flecks N965S ND ND 15 M 14 OD 20/200 23.84 1 II EM Nasal flecks IVS38-10 Tb0e;C IVS40af9;5 Gb0e;A ND 16 M 52 OS 20/20 1.3 0 I M - IVS38-10 Tb0e;C ND ND 17 M 34 OS 20/30 2.8 1 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 18 F 33 OD 20/100 6 6 I M - G1961E R2077W ND 19 F 22 OS 20/60 11 4 I M - A854T A1038V C2150Y 20 F 34 OS 20/200 14.2 14 I EM - G1961E ND ND 21 F 19 OD 20/200 3.7 12 I EM - R602W M18821 ND 22 F 27 OD 20/400 9.6 9 II EM Peripapillary atrophy P1380L P1380L ND 23 F 18 OS 20/50 4.9 5 I EM - R1640W V1693I ND 24 M 22 OS 20/150 10.5 2 I EM - C54Y ND ND 25 M 44 OS 20/150 9.1 5 I EM - R1640W ND ND VA, visual acuity; Rel. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical utility of the ABCR400 microarray: basing... Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;127(4):549-54. Roberts LJ, Ramesar RS, Greenberg J
Clinical utility of the ABCR400 microarray: basing a genetic service on a commercial gene chip.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;127(4):549-54., [PMID:19365039]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical utility of ABCR400 microarray testing in patients with ABCA4-associated retinopathies and to report on possible issues that could arise should genetic results be delivered without validation. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two probands were genotyped with the microarray. Diagnostic assays were designed to verify all mutations identified in individuals in whom at least 2 causative mutations were found. Mutations were verified in the probands, and wherever possible cosegregation analysis was performed in additional family members. RESULTS: Eighty-five of the 132 probands (64.4%) genotyped with the microarray had 2 or more disease-associated mutations identified. Verification of the genotyping, however, resulted in only 80 families being able to benefit from genetic result delivery. The remaining families could not receive results owing to the confounding effect of multiple ABCA4 mutations or the incorrect identification of mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCR400 microarray is useful for mutation screening; however, raw data cannot be delivered directly to patients. All mutations should be verified and, whenever possible, investigated in other family members. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Validated ABCR400 results provide an unequivocal molecular diagnosis, allowing family members to be offered diagnostic, predictive, carrier, and prenatal testing. Use of the microarray can inform decision-making and identify candidates for future therapies.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
96 (No R1640W) (No W1408R) Het R1640W Het W1408R Het R1640W Het W1408R Figure 7. Pedigree of family RPS593 in which both mutations in the proband were found to be transmitted on a single parental (paternal) allele. Login to comment
98 (No R1640W) (No W1408R) Het R1640W Het W1408R Het R1640W Het W1408R Figure 7. Pedigree of family RPS593 in which both mutations in the proband were found to be transmitted on a single parental (paternal) allele. Login to comment

[hide] Spectrum of the ABCA4 gene mutations implicated in... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):985-90. Valverde D, Riveiro-Alvarez R, Aguirre-Lamban J, Baiget M, Carballo M, Antinolo G, Millan JM, Garcia Sandoval B, Ayuso C
Spectrum of the ABCA4 gene mutations implicated in severe retinopathies in Spanish patients.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):985-90., [PMID:17325136]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe the spectrum of mutations in the ABCA4 gene found in Spanish patients affected with several retinal dystrophies. METHODS: Sixty Spanish families with different retinal dystrophies were studied. Samples were analyzed for variants in all 50 exons of the ABCA4 gene by screening with the ABCR400 microarray, and results were confirmed by direct sequencing. Haplotype analyses were also performed. For those families with only one mutation detected by the microarray, denaturing (d)HPLC was performed to complete the mutational screening of the ABCA4 gene. RESULTS: The sequence analysis of the ABCA4 gene led to the identification of 33 (27.5%) potential disease-associated alleles among the 60 patients. These comprised 16 distinct sequence variants in 25 of the 60 subjects investigated. For autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy (arCRD), we found that 50% of the CRD families with the mutation had two recurrent changes (2888delG and R943Q). For retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and autosomal dominant macular dystrophy (adMD), one putative disease-associated allele was identified in 9 of the 27 and 3 of the 7 families, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the population studied, ABCA4 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of arCRD. However, mutations in this gene are less frequently identified in other retinal dystrophies, like RP or adMD, and therefore it is still not clear whether ABCA4 is involved as a modifying factor or the relationship is a fortuitous association.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
56 TABLE 1. Genetic Analyses of ABCA4 Mutations in Three Families with Autosomal Dominant Macular Dystrophy Family Allele 1 Allele 2 Haplotype AnalysisNucleotide Change Amino Acid Change Nucleotide Change Amino Acid Change ADDM-59 [5582G3A; 6764G3T] [G1961E; S22551] Excluded ADDM-92 466A3G I156V Not done ADDM-105 2828G3A R943Q Not done No change has been detected as allele 2. Login to comment
57 TABLE 2. Genetic Analyses of ABCA4 Mutations in 13 arCRD Families Family Allele 1 Allele 2 Haplotype AnalysisNucleotide Change Amino Acid Change Nucleotide Change Amino Acid Change ARDM-79 2888delG Frameshift 2888delG Frameshift Cosegregates ARDM-85 6764G3T S2255I (likely nonpathogenic) Not detected Not done* ARDM-86 2888delG Frameshift 2888delG Frameshift Cosegregates ARDM-99 4297G3A V1433I Not detected Not done* ARDM-126 [2828G3A; 5929G3A] [R943Q; G1977S] [2828G3A; 5929G3A] [R943Q; G1977S] Cosegregates ARDM-133 32T3C L11P 2888delG Frameshift Cosegregates ARDM-134 2828G3A R943Q Excluded ARDM-174 4918C3T R1640W c.6147؉2T3A Splice Cosegregates ARDM-176 2888delG Frameshift 6179T3G L2060R Cosegregates RP-267 5041del 15 pb Frameshift 5041del 15 pb Frameshift Cosegregates RP-577 1140T3A N380K Not detected Not done* SRP-964 2828G3A R943Q Not detected Not done* B210 2828G3A R943Q 2701A3G T901A Not done* The mutation detected by dHPLC is in bold. Login to comment
112 The family ARDM 174 presented two mutations, one the missense mutation R1640W detected by the ABCA400 microarray and with an unknown effect in the ABCR function, and the TABLE 4. Login to comment
109 The family ARDM 174 presented two mutations, one the missense mutation R1640W detected by the ABCA400 microarray and with an unknown effect in the ABCR function, and the TABLE 4. Login to comment

[hide] Evolution of ABCA4 proteins in vertebrates. J Mol Evol. 2005 Jan;60(1):72-80. Yatsenko AN, Wiszniewski W, Zaremba CM, Jamrich M, Lupski JR
Evolution of ABCA4 proteins in vertebrates.
J Mol Evol. 2005 Jan;60(1):72-80., [PMID:15696369]

Abstract [show]
The ABCA4 (ABCR) gene encodes a retinal-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter. Mutations in ABCA4 are responsible for several recessive macular dystrophies and susceptibility to age related macular degeneration (AMD). The protein appears to function as a flippase of all-trans-retinaldehyde and/or its derivatives across the membrane of outer segment disks and is a potentially important element in recycling visual cycle metabolites. However, the understanding of ABCA4's role in the visual cycle is limited due to the lack of a direct functional assay. An evolutionary analysis of ABCA4 may aid in the identification of conserved elements, the preservation of which implies functional importance. To date, only human, murine, and bovine ABCA4 genes are described. We have identified ABCA4 genes from African (Xenopus laevis) and Western (Silurana tropicalis) clawed frogs. A comparative analysis describing the evolutionary relationships between the frog ABCA4s, annotated T. rubripes ABCA4, and mammalian ABCA4 proteins was carried out. Several segments are conserved in both intradiscal loop (IL) domains, in addition to the transmembrane and ATP-binding domains. Nonconserved segments were found in the IL and cytoplasmic linker domains. Maximum likelihood analyses of the aligned sequences strongly suggest that ABCA4 was subject to purifying selection. Collectively, these data corroborate the current evolutionary model where two distinct ABCA half-transporter progenitors were combined to form a full ABCA4 progenitor in ancestral chordates. We speculate that evolutionary alterations may increase the retinoid metabolite recycling capacity of ABCA4 and may improve dark adaptation.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
130 As anticipated, the most frequently occurring STGD- associated missense ABCA4 alterations (R212C, L541P, D645N, G863A, A1038V, R1108C, R1380L, W1408R, T1526M, R1640W, G1961E, L2027F, and L2030Q) map to highly conserved regions. Login to comment

[hide] Microarray-based mutation analysis of the ABCA4 (A... Eur J Hum Genet. 2004 Dec;12(12):1024-32. Klevering BJ, Yzer S, Rohrschneider K, Zonneveld M, Allikmets R, van den Born LI, Maugeri A, Hoyng CB, Cremers FP
Microarray-based mutation analysis of the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene in autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy and retinitis pigmentosa.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2004 Dec;12(12):1024-32., [PMID:15494742]

Abstract [show]
Mutations in the ABCA4 gene have been associated with autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1), cone-rod dystrophy (CRD), and retinitis pigmentosa (RP). We employed a recently developed genotyping microarray, the ABCR400-chip, to search for known ABCA4 mutations in patients with isolated or autosomal recessive CRD (54 cases) or RP (90 cases). We performed detailed ophthalmologic examinations and identified at least one ABCA4 mutation in 18 patients (33%) with CRD and in five patients (5.6%) with RP. Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and subsequent DNA sequencing revealed four novel missense mutations (R24C, E161K, P597S, G618E) and a novel 1-bp deletion (5888delG). Ophthalmoscopic abnormalities in CRD patients ranged from minor granular pigmentary changes in the posterior pole to widespread atrophy. In 12 patients with recordable electroretinogram (ERG) tracings, a cone-rod pattern was detected. Three patients demonstrated progression from a retinal dystrophy resembling STGD1 to a more widespread degeneration, and were subsequently diagnosed as CRD. In addition to a variable degree of atrophy, all RP patients displayed ophthalmologic characteristics of classic RP. When detectable, ERG recordings in these patients demonstrated rod-cone patterns of photoreceptor degeneration. In conclusion, in this study, we show that the ABCA4 mutation chip is an efficient first screening tool for arCRD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
57 Table 1 ABCA4 sequence variants in CRD patients CRD patient number Inheritance Allele 1 Allele 2 Mutations segregateNucleotide change Effect Nucleotide change Effect 12608 Isolated IVS38-10T4C Unknowna IVS38-10T4C Unknowna Yes 14488 Isolated 1622T4C; 3113C4T L541P; A1038V Not identified NA 14750 Isolated 4918C4T R1640W Not identified NA 14752 Isolated 1622T4C; 3113C4T L541P; A1038V IVS38-10T4C Unknowna ? Login to comment
143 Given this clinical presentation and the fact that homozygous null mutations were not found Table 5 Functional assessment of missense (A) and splice site (B) mutations (A) Missense mutation Nature of amino-acid change Effect on ABCR functionRef R18W Nonconservative Unknown R24C Nonconservative Unknown; adjacent to first transmembrane domain G65E Nonconservative Unknown E161K Nonconservative Unknown L541P Conservative Decreased ATP binding and ATPase activity50 P597S Nonconservative Unknown G618E Nonconservative Unknown V767D Nonconservative Decreased ABCR expression10 G863A Nonconservative Decreased ATPase activity50, 51 R943Q Nonconservative Decreased ATPase activity51 A1038V Conservative Decreased ATP binding and ATPase activity50 E1087K Nonconservative Decreased ATP binding50 V1433I Conservative Unknown R1640W Nonconservative Unknown A1794D Nonconservative Introduction charged aa in 10th transmembrane domain G1961E Nonconservative Decreased ATP binding and ATPase activity 50 V2050L Conservative Unknown D2177N Nonconservative Increased ATPase activity50 (B) Splice site mutation Effect on mRNARef Predicted effect on ABCR protein 768G4T Nonsense-mediated decay33 No protein IVS36+2T4C Unknown Truncation of exon 36 resulting in V1673fs? Login to comment

[hide] Genotyping microarray (gene chip) for the ABCR (AB... Hum Mutat. 2003 Nov;22(5):395-403. Jaakson K, Zernant J, Kulm M, Hutchinson A, Tonisson N, Glavac D, Ravnik-Glavac M, Hawlina M, Meltzer MR, Caruso RC, Testa F, Maugeri A, Hoyng CB, Gouras P, Simonelli F, Lewis RA, Lupski JR, Cremers FP, Allikmets R
Genotyping microarray (gene chip) for the ABCR (ABCA4) gene.
Hum Mutat. 2003 Nov;22(5):395-403., [PMID:14517951]

Abstract [show]
Genetic variation in the ABCR (ABCA4) gene has been associated with five distinct retinal phenotypes, including Stargardt disease/fundus flavimaculatus (STGD/FFM), cone-rod dystrophy (CRD), and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Comparative genetic analyses of ABCR variation and diagnostics have been complicated by substantial allelic heterogeneity and by differences in screening methods. To overcome these limitations, we designed a genotyping microarray (gene chip) for ABCR that includes all approximately 400 disease-associated and other variants currently described, enabling simultaneous detection of all known ABCR variants. The ABCR genotyping microarray (the ABCR400 chip) was constructed by the arrayed primer extension (APEX) technology. Each sequence change in ABCR was included on the chip by synthesis and application of sequence-specific oligonucleotides. We validated the chip by screening 136 confirmed STGD patients and 96 healthy controls, each of whom we had analyzed previously by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technology and/or heteroduplex analysis. The microarray was >98% effective in determining the existing genetic variation and was comparable to direct sequencing in that it yielded many sequence changes undetected by SSCP. In STGD patient cohorts, the efficiency of the array to detect disease-associated alleles was between 54% and 78%, depending on the ethnic composition and degree of clinical and molecular characterization of a cohort. In addition, chip analysis suggested a high carrier frequency (up to 1:10) of ABCR variants in the general population. The ABCR genotyping microarray is a robust, cost-effective, and comprehensive screening tool for variation in one gene in which mutations are responsible for a substantial fraction of retinal disease. The ABCR chip is a prototype for the next generation of screening and diagnostic tools in ophthalmic genetics, bridging clinical and scientific research.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
115 Mutations Detected in theTwoTest Populations by the ABCR400 Array,That Had Not Been Found by SSCP Number Nucleotide change Protein e¡ect Number of cases 1 161G4A C54Y 3 2 194G4A G65E 1 3 428C4T P143L 1 4 455G4A R152Q 1 5 514G4A G172S 1 6 635G4A R212H 1 7 656G4C R219T 1 8 768G4Ta Splice/V256V 3 9 1007C4G S336C 2 10 1268A4G H423R 4 11 1411G4A E471K 2 12 1622T4Ca L541P 8 13 1933G4A D645N 1 14 2041C4T R681X 5 15 2090G4A W697X 1 16 2471T4C I824T 1 17 2588G4Ca Splice/G863A 5 18 2828G4A R943Q 1 19 2966T4C V989A 1 20 2971G4C G991R 1 21 4139C4T P1380L 8 22 4195G4A E1399K 1 23 4328G4A R1443H 1 24 4457C4T P1486L 1 25 4462T4Ca C1488R 1 26 4469G4Aa C1490Y 1 27 4918C4Ta R1640W 2 28 IVS40+5G4A Splice 2 29 5537T4C I1846T 2 30 5882G4A G1961E 5 31 6089G4A R2030Q 1 32 6104T4C L2035P 1 33 6449G4A C2150Y 1 Mutation numbering is based on the cDNA sequence (GenBank NM_000350). Login to comment

[hide] An ABCA4 genomic deletion in patients with Stargar... Hum Mutat. 2003 Jun;21(6):636-44. Yatsenko AN, Shroyer NF, Lewis RA, Lupski JR
An ABCA4 genomic deletion in patients with Stargardt disease.
Hum Mutat. 2003 Jun;21(6):636-44., [PMID:12754711]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease (STGD1) segregates with mutations in the ABCA4 (ABCR) locus. However, mutations of the ABCA4 coding region detected by sequencing account for only 66-80% of disease chromosomes. We hypothesized a potential contribution of otherwise undetected genomic rearrangements of the ABCA4 region. To investigate this hypothesis, we performed genomic Southern analysis on samples from 96 STGD families in which we had identified either one or no ABCA4 mutations by conventional methods. Among 192 chromosomes evaluated, we found one deletion (0.52%), IVS17-905_IVS18+35del, that spans 1,030 bp and eliminates exon 18 of ABCA4. By conceptual translation, this alteration creates an in-frame deletion of 30 amino acids, G885_H915del, and cosegregates with the disease in this family, implying a disease-associated allele. STGD subjects with this deletion were found to have a second mutant ABCA4 allele, 2588G>C. DNA sequence analysis of the deletion junction revealed consensus DNA topoisomerase I sites at both breakpoints that may predispose to nonhomologous recombination. Using deletion-specific PCR, we found the same allele in 2 of 308 STGD subjects (0.32%), in 1 of 96 age-related macular degeneration (AMD) subjects (0.52%), and in 2 of 480 (0.2%) individuals with no known eye diseases, but it was absent in a control group consisting of 96 individuals over age 60 and with normal eye examinations. In vitro biochemical studies of the cloned G885_H915del mutation revealed diminished expression, suggesting that partial deletion of the putative nucleotide-binding domain I leads to either misfolding or defective membrane interactions and eventually reduces the protein function in the retinopathy-affected subjects. Our experiments suggest that genomic alterations contribute to only a small fraction of retinopathy-associated alleles.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
117 We used three plasmid constructs that encoded recombinant ABCR proteins for transient transfection into human HEK 293Tcells: the complex mutation [W1408R; R1640W] [Shroyer et al., 2001a], the deletion G885_H915del, and wild type. Login to comment
123 This result was comparable to expression of the ABCA4 observed with a retinitis pigmentosa associated null complex mutation [W1408R; R1640W] (Fig. 4) [Shroyer et al., 2001a]. Login to comment
140 Western immunoblotting analysis of the ABCR protein with G885_H915del showed a substantial reduction of the protein expression, comparable to the reduction observed for the complex mutation [W1408R; R1640W] [Shroyer et al., 2001a]. Login to comment
151 1is the complex ABCR allele [W1408R; R1640W],2 is theABCR allele with G885_H915del, and 3 is an ABCR wild-type allele. Login to comment

[hide] Cosegregation and functional analysis of mutant AB... Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Nov 1;10(23):2671-8. Shroyer NF, Lewis RA, Yatsenko AN, Wensel TG, Lupski JR
Cosegregation and functional analysis of mutant ABCR (ABCA4) alleles in families that manifest both Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.
Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Nov 1;10(23):2671-8., [PMID:11726554]

Abstract [show]
Mutations in ABCR (ABCA4) have been reported to cause a spectrum of autosomal recessively inherited retinopathies, including Stargardt disease (STGD), cone-rod dystrophy and retinitis pigmentosa. Individuals heterozygous for ABCR mutations may be predisposed to develop the multifactorial disorder age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We hypothesized that some carriers of STGD alleles have an increased risk to develop AMD. We tested this hypothesis in a cohort of families that manifest both STGD and AMD. With a direct-sequencing mutation detection strategy, we found that AMD-affected relatives of STGD patients are more likely to be carriers of pathogenic STGD alleles than predicted based on chance alone. We further investigated the role of AMD-associated ABCR mutations by testing for expression and ATP-binding defects in an in vitro biochemical assay. We found that mutations associated with AMD have a range of assayable defects ranging from no detectable defect to apparent null alleles. Of the 21 missense ABCR mutations reported in patients with AMD, 16 (76%) show abnormalities in protein expression, ATP-binding or ATPase activity. We infer that carrier relatives of STGD patients are predisposed to develop AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
45 AR33 and AR215 segregate complex alleles as well: the mutant allele [W1408R; R1640W] was observed in all affected siblings of the proband AR33-1 and also both the AMD-affected mother and AMD-affected maternal aunt (Fig. 1). Login to comment
50 The complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] was reported recently in an unrelated family segregating both STGD and retinitis pigmentosa (9). Login to comment
97 Pedigree Maternal allele Paternal allele AMD relative A priori Cosegregation AR19 pGM, -6 0.5 - AR33 [W1408R; R1640W] R24H and D1532N mA, -16 0.5 Yes AR59 4232insTATG C1488R pGM, -6 0.5 No AR80 T1526M pGF, -5 0.5 - AR80 T1526M mGF, -7 0.5 Yes AR125 4947delC C1488R pGM, -7 0.5 Yes AR215 [H1406Y; V2050L] pGM, -5 0.5 - AR218 2160+1G→C G1961E mA, -8 0.5 No AR262 W821R pGGF, -7 0.25 No AR271 P68R E1087K mGA, -6 0.25 No AR335 D645N F608I mGM, -9 0.5 Yes AR382 R1108C mGM, -6 0.5 Yes AR389 E2096K 5714+5G→A pGM, -8 0.5 Yes AR397 5196+1G→A 5585-1G→A mA, -5 0.5 No AR410 A1038V 768G→T pC, -5 0.25 Yes AR422 pGM, -6 0.5 - AR423 P1380L D1532N pGF, -4 0.5 No AR468 P1380L P1380L mU, -9 0.5 Yes AR484 L2027F G550R mGU, -5 0.25 Yes AR562 R2107H 3050+5G→A pGU, -5 0.25 No AR643 5196+2T→C L2027F mU, -4 0.5 Yes AR661 P1380L C54Y mGF, -6 0.5 Yes AR669 664del13 pGF, -4 0.5 No AR534 W821R P1380L pGM, -7 0.5 Yes (17) Family 1 R212C I2113M mGM, I-2 0.5 Yes (27) Family 2 R1108C R2107H mGM, I-2 0.5 Yes (27) Family 3 R212C G1977S mGF, I-1 0.5 Yes (27) 10.25 15 unlikely to account for many of the remaining alleles (our unpublished observations). Login to comment
99 Alternatively, presumed benign alterations may be pathogenic when combined with other alterations in a complex allele; evidence for a synergistic effect of two mutations in a complex allele has been reported recently for the [W1408R; R1640W] allele (9). Login to comment
115 Furthermore, the AMD-associated complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] has been reported to cause a severe defect in protein expression and ATP binding (9). Login to comment
120 Our data, taken with those of Sun et al. (28) and with the results on the [W1408R; R1640W] allele (9), demonstrate that 16/21 AMD-associated missense ABCR mutations manifest an abnormal effect on either protein expression, ATP-binding or ATPase activity. Login to comment

[hide] Null missense ABCR (ABCA4) mutations in a family w... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Nov;42(12):2757-61. Shroyer NF, Lewis RA, Yatsenko AN, Lupski JR
Null missense ABCR (ABCA4) mutations in a family with stargardt disease and retinitis pigmentosa.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Nov;42(12):2757-61., [PMID:11687513]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To determine the type of ABCR mutations that segregate in a family that manifests both Stargardt disease (STGD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and the functional consequences of the underlying mutations. METHODS: Direct sequencing of all 50 exons and flanking intronic regions of ABCR was performed for the STGD- and RP-affected relatives. RNA hybridization, Western blot analysis, and azido-adenosine triphosphate (ATP) labeling was used to determine the effect of disease-associated ABCR mutations in an in vitro assay system. RESULTS: Compound heterozygous missense mutations were identified in patients with STGD and RP. STGD-affected individual AR682-03 was compound heterozygous for the mutation 2588G-->C and a complex allele, [W1408R; R1640W]. RP-affected individuals AR682-04 and-05 were compound heterozygous for the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] and the missense mutation V767D. Functional analysis of the mutation V767D by Western blot and ATP binding revealed a severe reduction in protein expression. In vitro analysis of ABCR protein with the mutations W1408R and R1640W showed a moderate effect of these individual mutations on expression and ATP-binding; the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] caused a severe reduction in protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: These data reveal that missense ABCR mutations may be associated with RP. Functional analysis reveals that the RP-associated missense ABCR mutations are likely to be functionally null. These studies of the complex allele W1408R; R1640W suggest a synergistic effect of the individual mutations. These data are congruent with a model in which RP is associated with homozygous null mutations and with the notion that severity of retinal disease is inversely related to residual ABCR activity.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
7 STGD-affected individual AR682-03 was compound heterozygous for the mutation 2588G3C and a complex allele, [W1408R; R1640W]. Login to comment
8 RP-affected individuals AR682-04 and-05 were compound heterozygous for the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] and the missense mutation V767D. Login to comment
10 In vitro analysis of ABCR protein with the mutations W1408R and R1640W showed a moderate effect of these individual mutations on expression and ATP-binding; the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] caused a severe reduction in protein expression. Login to comment
14 These studies of the complex allele W1408R; R1640W suggest a synergistic effect of the individual mutations. Login to comment
46 Oligos corresponding to each mutation were: V767D, GTC TGG CAG CAG CCT GTA GTG GTG ACA TCT ATT TCA C; W1408R, GAC CCT TCA CCC CCG GAT ATA TGG GCA G; R1640W, CAA CGC CAT CTT ATG GGC CAG CCT GCC (mutant nucleotide positions are in bold type). Login to comment
76 Sequencing of STGD1-affected proband AR682-03 revealed three ABCR mutations: the transition 4222T3C that encodes the missense substitution W1408R, the transition 4918C3T that results in the missense substitution R1640W, and the transversion 2588G3C that gives rise to equal amounts of proteins with either a deletion of glycine at residue 863 or the missense substitution G863A (Fig. 2, Table 1).10,15,16 Sequencing of her RP-affected paternal grandmother, AR682-04, also revealed three ABCR mutations: the missense substitutions W1408R and R1640W and a transversion 2300T3A that encodes the missense substitution V767D (Fig. 2, Table 1).17 Direct DNA sequencing of all members of pedigree AR682 for the exons corresponding to these mutations revealed segregation of the mutation 2588G3C from the maternal lineage and the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] from the paternal lineage; the mutation V767D was identified only in the two RP-affected individuals (Fig. 2). Login to comment
80 Biochemical Analysis of Recombinant ABCR Plasmid constructs encoding recombinant ABCR proteins bearing the missense mutations V767D, W1408R, and R1640W, and the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] were transiently transfected into HEK 293T cells. Login to comment
88 Western blot analysis of proteins from cells transfected with the V767D or [W1408R; R1640W] mutation-bearing constructs showed very little, if any, protein (Fig. 4). Login to comment
89 In contrast, proteins bearing the W1408R or R1640W mutations appeared to have mild or moderate defects in expression or stability (Fig. 4). Login to comment
91 Recombinant ABCR bearing the V767D or [W1408R; R1640W] mutations showed no labeling with azido-ATP, even when fivefold total protein was used in the assay (Fig. 4 and data not shown). Login to comment
92 The recombinant protein bearing the R1640W mutation had a moderate effect on ATP labeling, with approximately 55% of wild-type activity. Login to comment
102 ABCR Alterations in Patients with Stargardt Disease and Retinitis Pigmentosa Exon Nucleotide Amino Acid AR682-03 AR682-04 3 302ϩ26 A/A A/G 10 1268G 3 A H423R A/A A/G 1356ϩ11delG 6G/6G 6G/7G 15 2300T 3 A V767D T/T T/A 17 2588G 3 C G863A G/C G/G 19 2828G 3 A R943Q G/A G/G 24 3523-30 A/T A/T 28 4203C 3 A P1401P C/A C/C 4222T 3 C W1408R C/T C/T 33 4667ϩ48 C/T T/T 35 4918C 3 T R1640W C/T C/T 40 5585-70 C/T T/T 5603A 3 T N1868I A/T A/A 5682G 3 C L1894L G/C G/G Mutations are indicated in bold. Login to comment
115 The 2588G3C alteration in STGD1 patient AR682-03 has been observed previously in 26 unrelated patients with STGD1 and has been classified as a mild mutant allele based on its association with later onset disease and its pairing with presumed severe alleles in patients with STGD1.10,15,19 In addition, we observed the polymorphism 2828G3A in cis to the 2588G3C alteration, consistent with linkage disequilibrium between these two alterations, as reported previously.15,19 The effects of the mutation 2588G3C have been studied by Sun et al.,12 who report a moderate reduction in expression of the G863A mutant protein and a modest reduction in ATP-binding for the G863del variant of the 2588G3C mutation. Login to comment
116 In individual AR682-03, the combination of the 2588G3C allele with the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] resulted in STGD1 with onset of visual symptoms at age 15 years, consistent with classification of the [W1408R; R1640W] allele as moderate to severe. Login to comment
117 RP-affected individuals AR682-04 and -05 carry the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] in trans to the missense allele V767D. Login to comment
121 ATP labeling and Western blot analysis of recombinant ABCR bearing the mutations V767D or [W1408R; R1640W] showed that these mutant proteins are not efficiently expressed in our transient transfection system, despite expression of substantial amounts of mRNA (Figs. Login to comment
123 Based on our new observations, we predict that both RP-associated alleles V767D and [W1408R; R1640W] represent severe mutations that result in little or no ABCR activity. Login to comment
126 However, the alterations W1408R and R1640W are each predicted to affect the first intradiscal loop, which has no known function.22 Of interest, the mutation V767D was reported in combination with the mutation 250delCAAA (a frameshift mutation that is a presumed null allele) in a patient with STGD1 with onset at age 8 years.17 That this patient (now 24 years old) has an ABCR genotype predicted to be equal to or more severe than that of our patient with advanced RP suggests a potential role for environmental or modifier gene effects. Login to comment
127 The effects of the W1408R mutation on ABCR expression and ATP binding are consistent with the classification of this as a mild to moderate mutation. Login to comment
129 Analysis of the R1640W mutation revealed a reduction in both expression (ϳ65% wild-type) and ATP-binding capacity (ϳ60% wild-type). Login to comment
130 Furthermore, our analysis of the mutations W1408R and R1640W alone and in combination suggest that the null effects of the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] are due to a combination of the two alterations, and are more severe than either mutation alone (Fig. 4). Login to comment
139 Biochemical analysis of recombinant ABCR bearing these mutations confirmed that the RP-associated missense mutations are null, and further demonstrated that the effects of the complex allele W1408R; R1640W are more severe than a simple additive effect of the two constituent mutations. Login to comment
45 Oligos corresponding to each mutation were: V767D, GTC TGG CAG CAG CCT GTA GTG GTG ACA TCT ATT TCA C; W1408R, GAC CCT TCA CCC CCG GAT ATA TGG GCA G; R1640W, CAA CGC CAT CTT ATG GGC CAG CCT GCC (mutant nucleotide positions are in bold type). Login to comment
75 Sequencing of STGD1-affected proband AR682-03 revealed three ABCR mutations: the transition 4222T3C that encodes the missense substitution W1408R, the transition 4918C3T that results in the missense substitution R1640W, and the transversion 2588G3C that gives rise to equal amounts of proteins with either a deletion of glycine at residue 863 or the missense substitution G863A (Fig. 2, Table 1).10,15,16 Sequencing of her RP-affected paternal grandmother, AR682-04, also revealed three ABCR mutations: the missense substitutions W1408R and R1640W and a transversion 2300T3A that encodes the missense substitution V767D (Fig. 2, Table 1).17 Direct DNA sequencing of all members of pedigree AR682 for the exons corresponding to these mutations revealed segregation of the mutation 2588G3C from the maternal lineage and the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] from the paternal lineage; the mutation V767D was identified only in the two RP-affected individuals (Fig. 2). Login to comment
79 Biochemical Analysis of Recombinant ABCR Plasmid constructs encoding recombinant ABCR proteins bearing the missense mutations V767D, W1408R, and R1640W, and the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] were transiently transfected into HEK 293T cells. Login to comment
87 Western blot analysis of proteins from cells transfected with the V767D or [W1408R; R1640W] mutation-bearing constructs showed very little, if any, protein (Fig. 4). Login to comment
90 Recombinant ABCR bearing the V767D or [W1408R; R1640W] mutations showed no labeling with azido-ATP, even when fivefold total protein was used in the assay (Fig. 4 and data not shown). Login to comment
101 ABCR Alterations in Patients with Stargardt Disease and Retinitis Pigmentosa Exon Nucleotide Amino Acid AR682-03 AR682-04 3 302af9;26 A/A A/G 10 1268G 3 A H423R A/A A/G 1356af9;11delG 6G/6G 6G/7G 15 2300T 3 A V767D T/T T/A 17 2588G 3 C G863A G/C G/G 19 2828G 3 A R943Q G/A G/G 24 3523-30 A/T A/T 28 4203C 3 A P1401P C/A C/C 4222T 3 C W1408R C/T C/T 33 4667af9;48 C/T T/T 35 4918C 3 T R1640W C/T C/T 40 5585-70 C/T T/T 5603A 3 T N1868I A/T A/A 5682G 3 C L1894L G/C G/G Mutations are indicated in bold. Login to comment
120 ATP labeling and Western blot analysis of recombinant ABCR bearing the mutations V767D or [W1408R; R1640W] showed that these mutant proteins are not efficiently expressed in our transient transfection system, despite expression of substantial amounts of mRNA (Figs. 3, 4). Login to comment
124 However, the alterations W1408R and R1640W are each predicted to affect the first intradiscal loop, which has no known function.22 Of interest, the mutation V767D was reported in combination with the mutation 250delCAAA (a frameshift mutation that is a presumed null allele) in a patient with STGD1 with onset at age 8 years.17 That this patient (now 24 years old) has an ABCR genotype predicted to be equal to or more severe than that of our patient with advanced RP suggests a potential role for environmental or modifier gene effects. Login to comment
128 Furthermore, our analysis of the mutations W1408R and R1640W alone and in combination suggest that the null effects of the complex allele [W1408R; R1640W] are due to a combination of the two alterations, and are more severe than either mutation alone (Fig. 4). Login to comment
136 Biochemical analysis of recombinant ABCR bearing these mutations confirmed that the RP-associated missense mutations are null, and further demonstrated that the effects of the complex allele W1408R; R1640W are more severe than a simple additive effect of the two constituent mutations. Login to comment

[hide] Mutations in ABCR (ABCA4) in patients with Stargar... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Sep;42(10):2229-36. Briggs CE, Rucinski D, Rosenfeld PJ, Hirose T, Berson EL, Dryja TP
Mutations in ABCR (ABCA4) in patients with Stargardt macular degeneration or cone-rod degeneration.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Sep;42(10):2229-36., [PMID:11527935]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To determine the spectrum of ABCR mutations associated with Stargardt macular degeneration and cone-rod degeneration (CRD). METHODS: One hundred eighteen unrelated patients with recessive Stargardt macular degeneration and eight with recessive CRD were screened for mutations in ABCR (ABCA4) by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Variants were characterized by direct genomic sequencing. Segregation analysis was performed on the families of 20 patients in whom at least two or more likely pathogenic sequence changes were identified. RESULTS: The authors found 77 sequence changes likely to be pathogenic: 21 null mutations (15 novel), 55 missense changes (26 novel), and one deletion of a consensus glycosylation site (also novel). Fifty-two patients with Stargardt macular degeneration (44% of those screened) and five with CRD each had two of these sequence changes or were homozygous for one of them. Segregation analyses in the families of 19 of these patients were informative and revealed that the index cases and all available affected siblings were compound heterozygotes or homozygotes. The authors found one instance of an apparently de novo mutation, Ile824Thr, in a patient. Thirty-seven (31%) of the 118 patients with Stargardt disease and one with CRD had only one likely pathogenic sequence change. Twenty-nine patients with Stargardt disease (25%) and two with CRD had no identified sequence changes. CONCLUSIONS: This report of 42 novel mutations brings the growing number of identified likely pathogenic sequence changes in ABCR to approximately 250.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
89 ABCR Sequence Changes Found in 118 Patients with Stargardt and 8 with CRD Patient ID Mutations (Amino Acid Based) Sequence Change (Nucleotide Based) Het/Hom Other Sequence Changes 21 Null Mutations 071-004 Met1Val ATG 3 GTC Het None 035-002* Ser84(insCAAA)30 251ins4 Het IVS36 ϩ 1G 3 A 034-039 Ser84(insCAAA)30 251ins4 Het Gly1961Glu 032-018 Arg152Ter23 CGA 3 TGA Het Arg2107Cys 032-005 Ala222(del13bp) 666del13 [AAAGACGGTGCGC] Het None 032-039 Ala222(del13bp) 666del13 [AAAGACGGTGCGC] Het None 032-060 [Ser278(delT); Arg1300Gln] [832delT; CGA 3 CAA] Het Pro1486Leu 032-066* Lys356Ter AAG 3 TAG Het Gln1513(insC) 032-072 - IVS13 ϩ 2T 3 C Het Val77Glu 032-073 Arg681Ter21 CGA 3 TGA Het Leu1388Pro 034-016 Ser1071(insGT)31 3212insGT Het None 032-065 Ser1071(insGT)31 3212insGT Het None 035-003 Ile1114(delC)5 3340delC Het Pro1380Leu 007-014* - IVS26 ϩ 1G 3 A Het Asn1345(insCA) 007-014* Asn1345(insCA) 4034insCA Het IVS26 ϩ 1G 3 A 032-066* Gln1513(insC) 4538insC Het Lys356Ter 032-010 Gln1513(insC) 4538insC Het None 032-024 Pro1570(delC)16 4710delC Het Gly1961Glu 032-016 Thr1721 (delAC) delete AC @ nt 5161 Het Thr1525Met 035-002* - IVS36 ϩ 1G 3 A23 Het Ser84(insCAAA) 034-031 Leu1741(del11) 5194del11 [GTGGTGGGCAT] Het Gly1961Glu 032-051 Trp1772Ter TGG 3 TGA Het None 032-022 - IVS41-2delA Het Gly1961Glu 032-081* Val1973(delG) 5917delG Hom None 034-017 Gly2100(delG) 6300delG Het Gly1961Glu 55 Missense and One In-Frame Deletion 032-020 Cys54Tyr15 TGC 3 TAC Het Gly863Ala 035-012 Cys54Tyr15 TGC 3 TAC Het Arg1108Cys 071-007 Cys54Tyr15 TGC 3 TAC Het Val935Ala 071-003 Asn58Lys AAC 3 AAG Het Leu1201Arg 032-069 Ala60Val15 GCG 3 GTG Het None 032-028 Gly65Glu16 GGA 3 GAA Het None 032-072 Val77Glu GTG 3 CAG Het IVS13 ϩ 2T 3 C 034-013 Gln190His CAG 3 CAC Het Gly1961Glu 032-076 Leu244Pro CTG 3 CCG Hom None 032-012 Pro309Arg CCA 3 CGA Het Arg1300Gln 032-054 Phe525Cys TTT 3 TGT Het Ile1846Thr 032-046 Arg537Cys CGT 3 TGT Het Val989Ala 034-038 Arg537Cys CGT 3 TGT Het Gly863Ala 032-095 Leu541Pro18 CTA 3 CCA Het None 034-022 Leu541Pro18 CTA 3 CCA Het Leu2027Phe 035-001 Leu541Pro18 CTA 3 CCA Het None 032-009 Leu541Pro18 CTA 3 CCA Het None 032-023 [Leu541Pro18 ; Ala1038Val27 ] [CTA 3 CCA; GCC 3 GTC] Het Gly863Ala 034-035 [Leu541Pro18 ; Ala1038Val27 ] [CTA 3 CCA; GCC 3 GTC] Het Gly863Ala 032-011 Ala549Pro GCC 3 CCC Het Gly1961Glu 032-044 Gly550Arg GGA 3 AGA Het None 032-085 Arg602Gln CGG 3 CAG Het Val643Met 032-090 Gly607Arg GGG 3 AGG Het Leu2027Phe 032-085 Val643Met GTG 3 ATG Het Arg602Gln 032-042 Val767Asp30 GTC 3 GAG Het Pro1486Leu 071-006 Val767Asp30 GTC 3 GAG Het Ile1562Thr 032-014 Leu797Pro CTG 3 CCG Het Pro1486Leu 032-038 Trp821Arg18 TGG 3 AGG Het None 034-045 Ile824Thr ATC 3 ACC Het Gly1961Glu 032-056 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het None 032-091 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het None 032-020 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Cys54Tyr 032-023 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het [Leu541Pro; Ala1038Val] 034-011 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Cys1488Arg 034-015 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Thr1525Met 034-035 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het [Leu541Pro; Ala1038Val] 034-036 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Cys2150Arg 034-038 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Arg537Cys 071-007 Val935Ala GTA 3 GCA Het Cys54Tyr 032-043 Arg943Trp CGG 3 TGG Het Arg1108Leu 032-046 Val989Ala GTT 3 GCT Het Arg537Cys 071-005 Arg1108Cys18 CGC 3 TGC Het None Patient ID Mutations (Amino Acid Based) Sequence Change (Nucleotide Based) Het/Hom Other Sequence Changes 035-012 Arg1108Cys18 CGC 3 TGC Het Cys54Tyr 032-043 Arg1108Leu5 CGC 3 CTC Het Arg943Trp 032-097 Glu1122Lys18 GAG 3 AAG Het None 035-019 Glu1122Lys18 GAG 3 AAG Het None 071-003 Leu1201Arg15 CTG 3 CGG Het Asn58Lys 032-012 Arg1300Gln CGA 3 CAA Het Pro309Arg 032-068 Arg1300Gln CGA 3 CAA Het None 032-013 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 032-015 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 032-027 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 071-001 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Hom None 034-020 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Leu2027Phe 034-028 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 034-044 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Leu2027Phe 034-048 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 035-003 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Ile1114(delC) 032-073 Leu1388Pro CTG 3 CCG Het Arg681Ter 034-040 Trp1408Arg15 TGG 3 CGG Het Arg1640Trp 035-013 Trp1408Arg15 TGG 3 CGG Het Arg1640Trp 032-060 Pro1486Leu20 CCA 3 CTA Het [Ser278(delT); Arg1300Gln] 032-014 Pro1486Leu20 CCA 3 CTA Het Leu797Pro 032-025 Pro1486Leu20 CCA 3 CTA Het Asp1531Asn 032-042 Pro1486Leu20 CCA 3 CTA Het Val767Asp 034-011 Cys1488Arg15 TGC 3 CGC Het Gly863Ala 032-034 Cys1490Tyr15 TGC 3 TAC Het Ile1846Thr 032-084 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het Arg2139Trp 032-016 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het Thr1721(delAC) 032-021 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het None 032-041 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het None 034-015 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het Gly863Ala 032-049 Asp1531Asn15 GAC 3 AAC Het Gly1961Glu 034-019 Asp1531Asn15 GAC 3 AAC Het None 032-025 Asp1531Asn15 GAC 3 AAC Het Pro1846Leu 071-006 Ile1562Thr27 ATT 3 ACT Het Val767Asp 034-040 Arg1640Trp18 CGG 3 TGG Het Trp1408Arg 035-013 Arg1640Trp18 CGG 3 TGG Het Trp1408Arg 032-030* Arg1640Gln CGG 3 CAG Hom None 032-019 Pro1776Leu CCC 3 CTC Het Gly1961Glu 032-034 Ile1846Thr21 ATT 3 ACT Het Cys1490Tyr 032-054 Ile1846Thr21 ATT 3 ACT Het Phe525Cys 032-011 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Ala549Pro 032-013 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 032-015 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 032-019 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1776Leu 032-022 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het IVS41-2delA 032-024 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1570(delC) 032-027 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 032-040 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 032-049 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Asp1531Asn 034-013 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Gln190His 034-017 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Gly2100(delG) 034-021 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 034-025 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 034-028 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 034-031 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Leu1741(del11) 034-033 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 034-039 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Ser84(insCAAA) 032-050 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 034-045 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Ile824Thr 034-048 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 032-003 Gly1977Ser15 GGC 3 AGC Het Leu2027Phe 032-003 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Gly1977Ser 032-090 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Gly607Arg 034-006 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het None 034-020 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Pro1380Leu 034-022 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Leu541Pro 034-044 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Pro1380Leu 035-011 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het None 032-063 Arg2030Gln15 CGA 3 CAA Het None 032-093 Arg2030Gln15 CGA 3 CAA Het None 2232 Briggs et al. IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. Login to comment
88 ABCR Sequence Changes Found in 118 Patients with Stargardt and 8 with CRD Patient ID Mutations (Amino Acid Based) Sequence Change (Nucleotide Based) Het/Hom Other Sequence Changes 21 Null Mutations 071-004 Met1Val ATG 3 GTC Het None 035-002* Ser84(insCAAA)30 251ins4 Het IVS36 af9; 1G 3 A 034-039 Ser84(insCAAA)30 251ins4 Het Gly1961Glu 032-018 Arg152Ter23 CGA 3 TGA Het Arg2107Cys 032-005 Ala222(del13bp) 666del13 [AAAGACGGTGCGC] Het None 032-039 Ala222(del13bp) 666del13 [AAAGACGGTGCGC] Het None 032-060 [Ser278(delT); Arg1300Gln] [832delT; CGA 3 CAA] Het Pro1486Leu 032-066* Lys356Ter AAG 3 TAG Het Gln1513(insC) 032-072 - IVS13 af9; 2T 3 C Het Val77Glu 032-073 Arg681Ter21 CGA 3 TGA Het Leu1388Pro 034-016 Ser1071(insGT)31 3212insGT Het None 032-065 Ser1071(insGT)31 3212insGT Het None 035-003 Ile1114(delC)5 3340delC Het Pro1380Leu 007-014* - IVS26 af9; 1G 3 A Het Asn1345(insCA) 007-014* Asn1345(insCA) 4034insCA Het IVS26 af9; 1G 3 A 032-066* Gln1513(insC) 4538insC Het Lys356Ter 032-010 Gln1513(insC) 4538insC Het None 032-024 Pro1570(delC)16 4710delC Het Gly1961Glu 032-016 Thr1721 (delAC) delete AC @ nt 5161 Het Thr1525Met 035-002* - IVS36 af9; 1G 3 A23 Het Ser84(insCAAA) 034-031 Leu1741(del11) 5194del11 [GTGGTGGGCAT] Het Gly1961Glu 032-051 Trp1772Ter TGG 3 TGA Het None 032-022 - IVS41-2delA Het Gly1961Glu 032-081* Val1973(delG) 5917delG Hom None 034-017 Gly2100(delG) 6300delG Het Gly1961Glu 55 Missense and One In-Frame Deletion 032-020 Cys54Tyr15 TGC 3 TAC Het Gly863Ala 035-012 Cys54Tyr15 TGC 3 TAC Het Arg1108Cys 071-007 Cys54Tyr15 TGC 3 TAC Het Val935Ala 071-003 Asn58Lys AAC 3 AAG Het Leu1201Arg 032-069 Ala60Val15 GCG 3 GTG Het None 032-028 Gly65Glu16 GGA 3 GAA Het None 032-072 Val77Glu GTG 3 CAG Het IVS13 af9; 2T 3 C 034-013 Gln190His CAG 3 CAC Het Gly1961Glu 032-076 Leu244Pro CTG 3 CCG Hom None 032-012 Pro309Arg CCA 3 CGA Het Arg1300Gln 032-054 Phe525Cys TTT 3 TGT Het Ile1846Thr 032-046 Arg537Cys CGT 3 TGT Het Val989Ala 034-038 Arg537Cys CGT 3 TGT Het Gly863Ala 032-095 Leu541Pro18 CTA 3 CCA Het None 034-022 Leu541Pro18 CTA 3 CCA Het Leu2027Phe 035-001 Leu541Pro18 CTA 3 CCA Het None 032-009 Leu541Pro18 CTA 3 CCA Het None 032-023 [Leu541Pro18 ; Ala1038Val27 ] [CTA 3 CCA; GCC 3 GTC] Het Gly863Ala 034-035 [Leu541Pro18 ; Ala1038Val27 ] [CTA 3 CCA; GCC 3 GTC] Het Gly863Ala 032-011 Ala549Pro GCC 3 CCC Het Gly1961Glu 032-044 Gly550Arg GGA 3 AGA Het None 032-085 Arg602Gln CGG 3 CAG Het Val643Met 032-090 Gly607Arg GGG 3 AGG Het Leu2027Phe 032-085 Val643Met GTG 3 ATG Het Arg602Gln 032-042 Val767Asp30 GTC 3 GAG Het Pro1486Leu 071-006 Val767Asp30 GTC 3 GAG Het Ile1562Thr 032-014 Leu797Pro CTG 3 CCG Het Pro1486Leu 032-038 Trp821Arg18 TGG 3 AGG Het None 034-045 Ile824Thr ATC 3 ACC Het Gly1961Glu 032-056 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het None 032-091 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het None 032-020 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Cys54Tyr 032-023 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het [Leu541Pro; Ala1038Val] 034-011 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Cys1488Arg 034-015 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Thr1525Met 034-035 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het [Leu541Pro; Ala1038Val] 034-036 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Cys2150Arg 034-038 Gly863Ala5 GGA 3 GCA Het Arg537Cys 071-007 Val935Ala GTA 3 GCA Het Cys54Tyr 032-043 Arg943Trp CGG 3 TGG Het Arg1108Leu 032-046 Val989Ala GTT 3 GCT Het Arg537Cys 071-005 Arg1108Cys18 CGC 3 TGC Het None IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10 ABCR in Stargardt Macular Degeneration Patient ID Mutations (Amino Acid Based) Sequence Change (Nucleotide Based) Het/Hom Other Sequence Changes 035-012 Arg1108Cys18 CGC 3 TGC Het Cys54Tyr 032-043 Arg1108Leu5 CGC 3 CTC Het Arg943Trp 032-097 Glu1122Lys18 GAG 3 AAG Het None 035-019 Glu1122Lys18 GAG 3 AAG Het None 071-003 Leu1201Arg15 CTG 3 CGG Het Asn58Lys 032-012 Arg1300Gln CGA 3 CAA Het Pro309Arg 032-068 Arg1300Gln CGA 3 CAA Het None 032-013 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 032-015 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 032-027 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 071-001 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Hom None 034-020 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Leu2027Phe 034-028 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 034-044 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Leu2027Phe 034-048 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Gly1961Glu 035-003 Pro1380Leu15 CCG 3 CTG Het Ile1114(delC) 032-073 Leu1388Pro CTG 3 CCG Het Arg681Ter 034-040 Trp1408Arg15 TGG 3 CGG Het Arg1640Trp 035-013 Trp1408Arg15 TGG 3 CGG Het Arg1640Trp 032-060 Pro1486Leu20 CCA 3 CTA Het [Ser278(delT); Arg1300Gln] 032-014 Pro1486Leu20 CCA 3 CTA Het Leu797Pro 032-025 Pro1486Leu20 CCA 3 CTA Het Asp1531Asn 032-042 Pro1486Leu20 CCA 3 CTA Het Val767Asp 034-011 Cys1488Arg15 TGC 3 CGC Het Gly863Ala 032-034 Cys1490Tyr15 TGC 3 TAC Het Ile1846Thr 032-084 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het Arg2139Trp 032-016 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het Thr1721(delAC) 032-021 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het None 032-041 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het None 034-015 Thr1525Met15 ACG 3 ATG Het Gly863Ala 032-049 Asp1531Asn15 GAC 3 AAC Het Gly1961Glu 034-019 Asp1531Asn15 GAC 3 AAC Het None 032-025 Asp1531Asn15 GAC 3 AAC Het Pro1846Leu 071-006 Ile1562Thr27 ATT 3 ACT Het Val767Asp 034-040 Arg1640Trp18 CGG 3 TGG Het Trp1408Arg 035-013 Arg1640Trp18 CGG 3 TGG Het Trp1408Arg 032-030* Arg1640Gln CGG 3 CAG Hom None 032-019 Pro1776Leu CCC 3 CTC Het Gly1961Glu 032-034 Ile1846Thr21 ATT 3 ACT Het Cys1490Tyr 032-054 Ile1846Thr21 ATT 3 ACT Het Phe525Cys 032-011 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Ala549Pro 032-013 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 032-015 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 032-019 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1776Leu 032-022 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het IVS41-2delA 032-024 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1570(delC) 032-027 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 032-040 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 032-049 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Asp1531Asn 034-013 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Gln190His 034-017 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Gly2100(delG) 034-021 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 034-025 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 034-028 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 034-031 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Leu1741(del11) 034-033 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 034-039 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Ser84(insCAAA) 032-050 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het None 034-045 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Ile824Thr 034-048 Gly1961Glu27 GGA 3 GAA Het Pro1380Leu 032-003 Gly1977Ser15 GGC 3 AGC Het Leu2027Phe 032-003 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Gly1977Ser 032-090 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Gly607Arg 034-006 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het None 034-020 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Pro1380Leu 034-022 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Leu541Pro 034-044 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het Pro1380Leu 035-011 Leu2027Phe5 CTC 3 TTC Het None 032-063 Arg2030Gln15 CGA 3 CAA Het None 032-093 Arg2030Gln15 CGA 3 CAA Het None 2232 Briggs et al. IOVS, September 2001, Vol. 42, No. 10 TABLE 1 (continued). Login to comment

[hide] An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89. Webster AR, Heon E, Lotery AJ, Vandenburgh K, Casavant TL, Oh KT, Beck G, Fishman GA, Lam BL, Levin A, Heckenlively JR, Jacobson SG, Weleber RG, Sheffield VC, Stone EM
An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89., [PMID:11328725]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess the allelic variation of the ATP-binding transporter protein (ABCA4). METHODS: A combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and automated DNA sequencing was used to systematically screen this gene for sequence variations in 374 unrelated probands with a clinical diagnosis of Stargardt disease, 182 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 96 normal subjects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of any single variant or class of variant between the control and AMD groups. In contrast, truncating variants, amino acid substitutions, synonymous codon changes, and intronic variants were significantly enriched in patients with Stargardt disease when compared with their presence in subjects without Stargardt disease (Kruskal-Wallis P < 0.0001 for each variant group). Overall, there were 2480 instances of 213 different variants in the ABCA4 gene, including 589 instances of 97 amino acid substitutions, and 45 instances of 33 truncating variants. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 97 amino acid substitutions, 11 occurred at a frequency that made them unlikely to be high-penetrance recessive disease-causing variants (HPRDCV). After accounting for variants in cis, one or more changes that were compatible with HPRDCV were found on 35% of all Stargardt-associated alleles overall. The nucleotide diversity of the ABCA4 coding region, a collective measure of the number and prevalence of polymorphic sites in a region of DNA, was found to be 1.28, a value that is 9 to 400 times greater than that of two other macular disease genes that were examined in a similar fashion (VMD2 and EFEMP1).

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
102 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 2 160 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 Ͻ0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4353 - 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4539 ϩ 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 Ͻ0.01 39 5584 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5714 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu Ͻ0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 Ͻ0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 Ͻ0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 Ͻ0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6729 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment
103 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 2 160 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 b0d;0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4353 afa; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4539 af9; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 b0d;0.01 39 5584 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5714 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu b0d;0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 b0d;0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 b0d;0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 b0d;0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6729 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment

[hide] An analysis of ABCR mutations in British patients ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jan;41(1):16-9. Papaioannou M, Ocaka L, Bessant D, Lois N, Bird A, Payne A, Bhattacharya S
An analysis of ABCR mutations in British patients with recessive retinal dystrophies.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jan;41(1):16-9., [PMID:10634594]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Several reports have shown that mutations in the ABCR gene can lead to Stargardt disease (STGD)/fundus flavimaculatus (FFM), autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (arRP), and autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy (arCRD). To assess the involvement of ABCR in these retinal dystrophies, the gene was screened in a panel of 70 patients of British origin. METHODS: Fifty-six patients exhibiting the STGD/FFM phenotype, 6 with arRP, and 8 with arCRD, were screened for mutations in the 50 exons of the ABCR gene by heteroduplex analysis and direct sequencing. Microsatellite marker haplotyping was used to determine ancestry. RESULTS: In the 70 patients analyzed, 31 sequence changes were identified, of which 20 were considered to be novel mutations, in a variety of phenotypes. An identical haplotype was associated with the same pair of in-cis alterations in 5 seemingly unrelated patients and their affected siblings with STGD/FFM. Four of the aforementioned patients were found to carry three alterations in the coding sequence of the ABCR gene, with two of them being in-cis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ABCR is a relatively polymorphic gene. Because putative mutations have been identified thus far only in 25 of 70 patients, of whom only 8 are compound heterozygotes, a large number of mutations have yet to be ascertained. The disease haplotype seen in the 5 patients carrying the same "complex" allele is consistent with the presence of a common ancestor.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
45 Neither of these putative TABLE 1. List of Mutations Found in 70 Patients of British Origin Nucleotide Change Amino Acid Change No. of Patients (/70) Phenotype No. of Controls (/96) G161A Cys-54-Tyr 1 STG/FFM NF A286G Asn-96-Asp 1 STG/FFM NF A286C Asn-96-His 1 STG/FFM NF A466G Ile-156-Val 1 STG/FFM NF C1220T Ala-407-Val 6 STG/FFM, arCRD NF T1271C Val-424-Ala 2 STG/FFM, arRP NF C1335G Ser-445-Arg 1 STG/FFM NF C1804T Arg-602-Trp 1 STG/FFM NF C2337A Cys-779-Ter 1 STG/FFM NF *G2588C Gly-863-Ala 5 STG/FFM 2/176 3392delC 1147 Ter 1 STG/FFM NF T4286C Val-1429-Ala 1 STG/FFM NF 4774-2A3C Splice acceptor 2 STG/FFM NF †C4918T Arg-1640-Trp 1 STG/FFM NF C5107G Gln-1703-Lys 1 STG/FFM NF 5161delAC Frameshift 1 STG/FFM NF C5337G Tyr-1779-Ter 1 STG/FFM NF C6088T Arg-2030-Ter 1 arCRD NF 6282ϩ7G3A Splice donor 1 STG/FFM NF G6449A Cys-2150-Tyr 2 arCRD NF A6479G Lys-2160-Arg 1 STG/FFM NF * Independently reported by Allikmets et al.6 † Independently reported by Rozet et al.8 NF, not found in 96 ethnically matched control individuals. Login to comment

[hide] A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinica... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15. Fujinami K, Lois N, Davidson AE, Mackay DS, Hogg CR, Stone EM, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Bunce C, Robson AG, Moore AT, Webster AR, Holder GE, Michaelides M
A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinical and electrophysiologic assessment, progression, and genotype correlations.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15., [PMID:23499370]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic natural history of Stargardt disease and correlate with the genotype. DESIGN: Cohort study of 59 patients. METHODS: Clinical history, examination, and electrophysiologic assessment were undertaken in a longitudinal survey. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on electrophysiologic findings, as previously published: Group 1 had dysfunction confined to the macula; Group 2 had macular and generalized cone system dysfunction; and Group 3 had macular and both generalized cone and rod system dysfunction. At baseline, there were 27 patients in Group 1, 17 in Group 2, and 15 in Group 3. Amplitude reduction of >50% in the relevant electroretinogram (ERG) component or a peak time shift of >3 ms for the 30 Hz flicker ERG or bright flash a-wave was considered clinically significant ERG deterioration. Molecular screening of ABCA4 was undertaken. RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 31.7 years, with the mean follow-up interval being 10.5 years. A total of 22% of patients from Group 1 showed ERG group transition during follow-up, with 11% progressing to Group 2 and 11% to Group 3. Forty-seven percent of patients in Group 2 progressed to Group 3. There was clinically significant ERG deterioration in 54% of all subjects: 22% of Group 1, 65% of Group 2, and 100% of Group 3. At least 1 disease-causing ABCA4 variant was identified in 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with initial rod ERG involvement demonstrated clinically significant electrophysiologic deterioration; only 20% of patients with normal full-field ERGs at baseline showed clinically significant progression. Such data assist counseling by providing more accurate prognostic information and are also highly relevant in the design, patient selection, and monitoring of potential therapeutic interventions.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
89 Clinical Data and Molecular Genetic Status of 59 Patients With Stargardt Disease Pt Onset (y) Age (y) logMAR VA Variants Identifieda BL FU BL FU 1 16 17 26 0.0/1.0 0.0/0.48 c.768G>T / p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg943Gln 2 15 17 25 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p. Arg1443His 3 11 18 27 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Trp439* / p.Gly863Ala / p.Leu1970Phe 4 19 21 32 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Leu2027Phe 5 10 22 30 0.48/0.48 1.0/0.78 p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg943Gln / c.5461-10 T>C 6 18 26 37 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Pro1380Phe 7 25 28 40 0.78/1.0 1.3/0.78 ND 8 24 29 38 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Phe418Ser / p.Leu2027Phe 9 24 31 44 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.0 c.4253&#fe;5 G>T / p.Gly1507Arg 10 26 32 44 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Cys1490Tyr / p.Arg2030Gln 11 31 34 46 0.18/0.3 0.6/0.7 ND 12 17 35 47 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Asn96His 13 23 35 45 1.0/0.3 1.0/0.48 p.Gly1513Profs*1554 14 33 37 48 0.18/1.48 1.0/1.3 ND 15 38 40 51 0.18/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Arg2107His 16 42 43 53 0.0/0.0 1.0/1.0 ND 17 22 48 59 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr 18 20 49 59 1.0/0.6 1.0/1.0 p.Pro1380Leu / p.Gly1961Glu 19 35 50 61 1.0/0.3 1.0/1.0 p.Arg1108Cys 20 25 56 67 1.3/0.18 1.0/1.0 p.Trp439* / p.Gly863Ala 21 48 59 71 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 p. Ile156 Val / p. Cys1455Arg / p. Phe1839Ser 22 21 22 31 0.3/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Arg2107His 23 21 23 33 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala 24 48 64 73 0.0/1.0 0.18/3.0 p.Tyr1652* 25 17 19 29 0.78/0.3 1.0/1.0 c.5461-10 T>C 26 17 21 33 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 ND 27 27 53 66 1.78/1.78 1.3/1.0 p.Ser1071Cysfs*1084 28 5 14 21 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Arg408* / p.Val675lle 29 9 15 27 1.08/1.08 1.0/1.0 p.Cys2150Tyr 30 14 24 32 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 ND 31 18 28 39 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg1108Cys / p.Arg943Gln 32 14 29 37 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Arg653Cys / p.Arg2030Gln 33 19 29 40 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.08 ND 34 34 40 49 0.3/0.48 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala / p.Glu1087Lys 35 25 43 54 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr / p.Gly863Ala 36 38 60 69 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.08 p.Val931Met / c.5461-10 T>C 37 10 11 20 1.0/0.78 1.3/1.3 p.Pro1380Leu 38 10 15 23 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.3 p.Ser1071Cysfs*1084 / p.Pro1380Leu 39 24 25 38 1.56/0.3 2.0/2.0 c.5461-10 T>C / c.5714&#fe;5 G>A 40 18 26 36 1.3/1.3 2.0/1.3 ND 41 32 33 45 0.48/0.48 1.0/1.0 ND 42 32 35 46 1.3/0.0 3.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr 43 30 35 45 0.48/0.48 2.0/1.3 ND 44 15 41 49 1.3/1.3 2.0/1.3 p.Asn965Ser 45 8 8 20 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Thr1019Met 46 10 11 23 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Thr1019Met 47 8 12 24 2.0/1.56 1.78/1.48 p.Cys2150Tyr 48 17 18 26 1.0/0.78 1.3/1.0 c.5461-10 T>C / p.Leu2027Phe 49 8 21 33 1.3/1.3 2.0/2.0 p.Asp574Aspfs*582 50 8 27 39 2.0/1.56 1.78/1.48 c.5461-10 T>C 51 24 31 43 1.18/1.18 1.08/1.3 p.Arg1640Trp / p.Leu2027Phe Continued on next page respective electrophysiologic traces appear in Figure 2. Login to comment

[hide] The clinical effect of homozygous ABCA4 alleles in... Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 Jun 12. Fujinami K, Sergouniotis PI, Davidson AE, Mackay DS, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Robson AG, Holder GE, Moore AT, Michaelides M, Webster AR
The clinical effect of homozygous ABCA4 alleles in 18 patients.
Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 Jun 12., [PMID:23769331]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe the phenotypic presentation of a cohort of individuals with homozygous disease-associated ABCA4 variants. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen affected individuals from 13 families ascertained from a total cohort of 214 families with ABCA4-related retinal disease presenting to a single center. METHODS: A detailed history was obtained, and color fundus photography, autofluorescence (AF) imaging, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and electrophysiologic assessment were performed. Phenotypes based on ophthalmoscopy, AF, and electrophysiology were assigned using previously reported characteristics. ABCA4 mutation detection was performed using the ABCR400 microarray (Asper Biotech, Tartu, Estonia) and high-throughput DNA sequencing, with direct sequencing used to assess segregation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detailed clinical, electrophysiologic, and molecular genetic findings. RESULTS: Eleven disease-associated homozygous ABCA4 alleles were identified, including 1 frame shift, 2 stops, 1 intronic variant causing splice-site alteration, 2 complex missense variants, and 5 missense variants: p.Glu905fsX916, p.Arg1300X, p.Gln2220X, c.4253+4 C>T, p.Leu541Pro and p.Ala1038Val (homozygosity for complex allele), p.Val931Met and p.Arg1705Gln (complex allele), p.Arg212Cys, p.Cys1488Arg, p.Arg1640Trp, p.Gly1961Glu, and p.Leu2027Phe. Eight of these 11 homozygous alleles have not been reported previously. Six of 7 patients with homozygous null alleles had early-onset (<10 years) disease, with all 7 having a severe phenotype. Two patients with homozygous missense variants (p.Leu541Pro and p.Ala1038Val [complex], and p.Arg1640Trp) presented with a severe phenotype. Three patients with homozygous p.Gly1961Glu had adult-onset disease and a mild phenotype. One patient with homozygous p.Leu2027Phe showed a spared fovea and preserved visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: The phenotypes represented in patients identified as homozygous for presumed disease-associated ABCA4 variants gives insight into the effect of individual alleles. Null alleles have severe functional effects, and certain missense variants are similar to nulls, suggesting complete abrogation of protein function. The common alleles identified, p.Gly1961Glu and p. Leu2027Phe, both have a mild structural and functional effect on the adult retina; the latter is associated with relatively retained photoreceptor architecture and function at the fovea.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
7 Results: Eleven disease-associated homozygous ABCA4 alleles were identified, including 1 frame shift, 2 stops, 1 intronic variant causing splice-site alteration, 2 complex missense variants, and 5 missense variants: p.Glu905fsX916, p.Arg1300X, p.Gln2220X, c.4253&#fe;4 C>T, p.Leu541Pro and p.Ala1038Val (homozygosity for complex allele), p.Val931Met and p.Arg1705Gln (complex allele), p.Arg212Cys, p.Cys1488Arg, p.Arg1640Trp, p.Gly1961Glu, and p.Leu2027Phe. Login to comment
10 Two patients with homozygous missense variants (p.Leu541Pro and p.Ala1038Val [complex], and p.Arg1640Trp) presented with a severe phenotype. Login to comment
60 Sex Ethnicity Consanguinity Age at Onset (yrs) Age (yrs) Duration of Disease (yrs) LogMAR VA Fundus Appearance AF Pattern ERG Group OCT Central Foveal Thickness (mm) Mutation Status RE LE RE LE 1 1 M S Asian Yes (1st cousin) 11 33 22 1.0 1.0 2 2 1 64 69 c.634 C>T, p.Arg212Cys 2 1 F S Asian Yes (1st cousin) 11 36 25 1.0 1.0 2 2 3 31 41 c.634 C>T, p.Arg212Cys 3* 2 M European No 3 8 5 1.2 1.2 2 2 3y 41 36 c.1622 T>C, p.Leu541Pro / c.3113 C>T, p.Ala1038Val 4 3 F S Asian Yes (2nd cousin once removed) 5 8 3 1.0 1.0 2 2 3 NA NA c.2713delG, p.Glu905fsX916 5 4 M S Asian Yes (unknown) 10 25 15 1.0 1.08 2 2 3 64 60 c.2791 G>A, p.Val931Met / c.5114 G>A, p.Arg1705Gln 6 5 M S Asian Yes (1st cousin) 10 30 20 1.0 1.0 2 2 3 NA NA c.4462 T>C, p.Cys1488Arg 7 5 F S Asian Yes (1st cousin) 10 22 12 2.0 1.0 2 2 3 NA NA c.4462 T>C, p.Cys1488Arg 8 6 M ME Asian Yes (1st cousin) 30 36 6 1.08 2.0 3 3 3 103 95 c.4918 C>T, p.Arg1640Trp 9 7 F S Asian Yes (2nd cousin) 19 27 8 1.78 2.0 1 2 1 128 90 c.5882 G>A, p.Gly1961Glu 10 7 M S Asian Yes (2nd cousin) 30 34 4 0.48 0.48 1 2 1 NA NA c.5882 G>A, p.Gly1961Glu 11 8 F S Asian Yes (1st cousin) 17 26 9 0.78 0.78 1 1 1 54 47 c.5882 G>A, p.Gly1961Glu 12 9 F European No 44 44 0 0.18 0.0 2 2 1 NA NA c.6079 C>T, p.Leu2027Phe 13 10 M ME Asian Yes (1st cousin) 5 11 6 1.3 1.0 3 2 3 62 68 c.3898 C>T, p.Arg1300X 14 11 M S Asian Yes (unknown) 8 11 3 1.0 1.0 2 2 3 NA NA c.4253&#fe;4 C>T 15 12 M S Asian Yes (1st cousin) 9 48 39 3.0 3.0 3 NA 3 NA NA c.6658 C>T, p.Gln2220X 16 13 M S Asian Yes (uncle and niece) 4 7 3 1.08 1.08 1 NA 3 NA NA c.6658 C>T, p.Gln2220X 17 13 M S Asian Yes (uncle and niece) 6 8 2 1.08 1.0 1 NA 3 NA NA c.6658 C>T, p.Gln2220X 18 13 M S Asian Yes (1st cousin) 17 25 8 1.78 1.78 3 NA 3 NA NA c.6658 C>T, p.Gln2220X AF &#bc; autofluorescence; ERG &#bc; electroretinography; F &#bc; female; FM No. Login to comment
101 Patient 8, homozygous for p.Arg1640Trp, had severe disease but of adult onset: visual acuity Figure 4. Login to comment
121 These findings are similar to genetically identical patients reported by Wiszniewski et al.22 A very severe phenotype also was observed in patient 8 (p.Arg1640Trp), in keeping with the severe findings of genetically identical subjects, homozygous for p.Arg1640Trp, in a previous report by Briggs et al.10 In contrast, patients with homozygous null variants consistently showed a very severe phenotype: 6 of 7 had early-onset disease (<10 years), and all 7 had electrophysiologic evidence of generalized rod and cone system dysfunction. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disea... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003. Fujinami K, Sergouniotis PI, Davidson AE, Wright G, Chana RK, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Egan CA, Robson AG, Moore AT, Holder GE, Michaelides M, Webster AR
Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disease with preserved foveal structure and function.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003., [PMID:23953153]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease who show a foveal-sparing phenotype. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The foveal-sparing phenotype was defined as foveal preservation on autofluorescence imaging, despite a retinopathy otherwise consistent with Stargardt disease. Forty such individuals were ascertained and a full ophthalmic examination was undertaken. Following mutation screening of ABCA4, the molecular findings were compared with those of patients with Stargardt disease but no foveal sparing. RESULTS: The median age of onset and age at examination of 40 patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype were 43.5 and 46.5 years. The median logMAR visual acuity was 0.18. Twenty-two patients (22/40, 55%) had patchy parafoveal atrophy and flecks; 8 (20%) had numerous flecks at the posterior pole without atrophy; 7 (17.5%) had mottled retinal pigment epithelial changes; 2 (5%) had multiple atrophic lesions, extending beyond the arcades; and 1 (2.5%) had a bull's-eye appearance. The median central foveal thickness assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images was 183.0 mum (n = 33), with outer retinal tubulation observed in 15 (45%). Twenty-two of 33 subjects (67%) had electrophysiological evidence of macular dysfunction without generalized retinal dysfunction. Disease-causing variants were found in 31 patients (31/40, 78%). There was a higher prevalence of the variant p.Arg2030Gln in the cohort with foveal sparing compared to the group with foveal atrophy (6.45% vs 1.07%). CONCLUSIONS: The distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype are described. The presence of 2 distinct phenotypes of Stargardt disease (foveal sparing and foveal atrophy) suggests that there may be more than 1 disease mechanism in ABCA4 retinopathy.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
47 6089 G>A, p.Arg2030Gln/c.6118 C>T, p.Arg2040*] 8 39 44 0.1 0.1 4 297 230 U 3 A A NA NA [c.71 G>A, p.Arg24His/c.4577 C>T, p. Thr1526Met] 9 35* 35 0.18 0.18 2 142 154 3 ND ND NA NA [c.658 C>T, p.p.Arg220Cys/c.2588 G>C, p. Gly863Ala] 10 45 54 0.48 0.18 1 102 116 3 ND A NA NA [c.1957 C>T, p.Arg653Cys/c.5693 G>A, p.Arg1898His] 11 43 43 0.1 0 2 170 185 1 A A 2 2 [c.2588 G>C, p. Gly863Ala/c.4139 C>T, p.Ala1038Val] 12 36** 38 0.3 0 1 220 212 U 1 A A 1 1 [c.4139 C>T, p.Ala1038Val/c.4594 G>T, p.Asp1532Asn] 13 62 68 0.1 0.48 1 196 189 U 1 N N 2 2 [c.4222 T>C, p.Trp1408Arg/c.4918 C>T, p.Arg1640Trp] 14 36 44 0.48 0.48 3 79 89 1 A A NA NA [c.4222 T>C, p.Trp1408Arg/c.4918 C>T, p.Arg1640Trp] 15 46* 46 0.1 0.1 3 NA NA 1 A A NA NA [c.4469 G>A, p.Cys1490Tyr/c. Login to comment
127 2588G>C, p.Gly863Ala 4 Het Allikmets46 Intol. 0.01 PRD 0.996 No change 68/13006 db SNP (rs76157638) 21 c.3113C>T, p.Ala1038Val 1 Het Webster53 Tol. NA Benign 0.014 Donor 43.5 70 New site (&#fe;61.72) 22/13006 db SNP (rs61751374) 24 c.3602T>G, p.Leu1201Arg 2 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA Benign 0.052 Donor 61.3 74 New site (&#fe;20.08) 416/13006 db SNP (rs61750126) 27 c.3898C>T, p.Arg1300* 1 Het Rivera49 NA NA ND 28 c.4139C>T, p.Pro1380Leu 2 Het Lewis48 Intol. 0.01 Benign 0.377 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs61750130) 28 c.4222 T>C, p.Trp1408Arg 2 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.845 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750135) 29 c.4319T>C, p.Phe1440Ser 1 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.744 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750141) 30 c.4469G>A, p.Cys1490Tyr 1 Het Webster53 Intol. 0.03 PRD 0.994 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751402) 31 c.4577C>T, p.Thr1526Met 1 Het Lewis48 Intol. 0.00 PRD 0.91 No change ND db SNP (rs61750152) 31 c.4594G>T, p.Asp1532Asn 3 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.853 No change ND 33 c.4685T>C, p.Ile1562Thr 1 Het Allikmets46 Tol. NA Benign 0.034 No change 18/13006 db SNP (rs1762111) 35 c.4956T>G, p.Tyr1652* 1 Het Fumagalli52 NA NA Acceptor 43 72 New site (&#fe;67.36) ND 35 c.4918C>T, p.Arg1640Trp 2 Het Rozet47 Intol. 0.00 PRD 1 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751404) 35 c.4926C>G, p.Ser1642Arg 1 Het Birch50 Tol. 0.68 Benign 0.116 No change ND db SNP (rs61753017) Int 35 c.5018&#fe;2T>C, Splice site 1 Het Fumagalli52 NA NA Donor 81.2 54 WT site broken (33.07) ND Int 38 c.5461-10T>C 3 Het Briggs50 NA NA No change 3/13006 db SNP (rs1800728) 40 c.5693G>A, p.Arg1898His 2 Het Allikmets46 NA Benign 0.00 No change 25/13006 db SNP (rs1800552) 42 c.5882G>A, p.Gly1961Glu 1 Het Allikmets46 Tol. 0.18 PRD 1 No change 41/13006 db SNP (rs1800553) 44 c.6079C>T, p.Leu2027Phe 4 Homo Lewis48 Intol. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 4/13006 db SNP (rs61751408) 44 c.6089G>A, p.Arg2030Gln 4 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.995 No change 8/13006 db SNP (rs61750641) 44 c.6118C>T, p.Arg2040* 1 Het Rosenberg54 NA NA ND 46 c.6320G>A, p.Arg2107His 1 Het Fishman8 Intol. 0.00 PRD 0.996 No change 91/13006 db SNP (rs62642564) EVS &#bc; Exome Variant Server; HSF &#bc; Human Splicing Finder program; Hum var score &#bc; Human var score; Int &#bc; intron; Intol &#bc; intolerant; Mt CV &#bc; mutant consensus value; NA &#bc; not applicable; ND &#bc; not detected; PRD &#bc; probably damaging; Pred. &#bc; prediction; SIFT &#bc; Sorting Intolerant from Tolerance program; Tol. &#bc; tolerant; Wt CV &#bc; wild-type consensus value. Login to comment
142 Allele Frequencies of 72 ABCA4 Variants Identified in a Comparison Groupa With the Typical Stargardt Disease (140 Patients Without Evidence of Foveal Sparing on Autofluorescence Imaging) (Continued) Exon Nucleotide Substitution and Amino Acid Change Number of Alleles Allele Frequency Int 33 c.4773&#fe;48C>T 1 0.36% 34 c.4793C>A, p.Ala1598Asp 1 0.36% 35 c.c.4918C>T, p.Arg1640Trp 1 0.36% Int 35 c.5018&#fe;2T>C, Splice site 2 0.71% 36 c.5114G>A, p.Arg1705Gln 2 0.71% 37 c.5222_5233delTGGTGGTGGGC, p.Lys1741Hisfs 1 0.36% 37 c.5281_5289delCTT CCT GCC, p.Pro1761_Leu1763del 2 0.71% Int 38 c.5461-10T>C 23 8.21% Int 39 c.5585-1G>A, Splice site 1 0.36% Int 40 c.5714&#fe;5G>A, Splice site 5 1.79% 42 c.5882G>A, p.Gly1961Glu 17 6.07% 43 c.5908C>T, p.Leu1970Phe 2 0.71% 43 c.5917delG, p.Val1973* 1 0.36% 44 c.6079C>T, p.Leu2027Phe 10 3.57% 44 c.6089G>A, p.Arg2030Gln 3 1.07% 44 c.6118C>T, p.Arg2040* 1 0.36% 45 c.6148G>C, p.Val2050Leu 3 1.43% 46 c.6286G>A, p.Glu2096Lys 1 0.36% 46 c.6320G>A, p.Arg2107His 4 1.43% 47 c.6445C>T, p.Arg2149* 1 0.36% 47 c.6449G>A, p.Cys2150Tyr 3 1.07% 48 c.6658C>T, p.Gln2220* 3 1.07% 48 c.6709_6710insG, p.Thr2237Serfs 1 0.36% Int &#bc; Intron. Login to comment

[hide] Distinct characteristics of inferonasal fundus aut... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 17;54(10):6820-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12895. Duncker T, Lee W, Tsang SH, Greenberg JP, Zernant J, Allikmets R, Sparrow JR
Distinct characteristics of inferonasal fundus autofluorescence patterns in stargardt disease and retinitis pigmentosa.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 17;54(10):6820-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12895., [PMID:24071957]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To report distinct characteristics of fundus autofluorescence (AF) patterns inferior to the optic disc in recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS: Short-wavelength (SW) and near-infrared (NIR) AF images were acquired from patients with STGD1 and RP. In SW- and NIR-AF images of STGD1 patients, gray levels (GL) on both sides of the demarcation line were measured. RESULTS: In STGD1, a demarcation line, which has been assigned to the closed optic fissure, was visible on SW-AF and NIR-AF inferior to the optic disc. In healthy subjects, this demarcation line is only visible by SW-AF. At 20 degrees inferior to the disc center, AF levels on the nasal side were 25% (+/-11%) lower than on the temporal side in SW-AF images and 18% (+/-11%) lower in NIR-AF images. For both STGD1 and RP, the inferonasal quadrant exhibited distinct SW- and NIR-AF patterns compared with other fundus areas. Disease-related AF changes, such as flecks, appeared to respect the demarcation line as a boundary. CONCLUSIONS: Disease-related AF patterns originating in RPE in STGD1 and RP appear to respect the demarcation line in the inferonasal quadrant of the fundus as a border. The visibility of the inferonasal demarcation line by NIR-AF in STGD1 but not in healthy eyes may indicate that increased levels of RPE lipofuscin modulate the melanin-related NIR-AF signal. This feature of NIR-AF images may aid in the diagnosis of STGD1 patients.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
51 Summary of Demographic, Clinical, and Genetic Data Patient Condition ABCA4 Mutations Sex Age, y Eye Iris Color Race/Ethnicity BCVA Snellen (logMAR) P1 STGD1 p.P1380L, p.G1961E M 12 OS Blue White 20/100 (0.70) P2 STGD1 p.P1380L, p.G1961E F 17 OS Brown White 20/150 (0.88) P3 STGD1 p.Q1003X, p.G1961E M 25 OS Brown White 20/40 (0.30) P4 STGD1 p.C54Y F 48 OD Blue White 20/30 (0.20) P5 STGD1 p.R2077W F 52 OD Blue White 20/40 (0.30) P6 STGD1 p.[L541P;A1038V] M 13 OS Brown White 20/150 (0.88) P7 STGD1 p.T972N, p.L2027F F 14 OS Blue White 20/80 (0.60) P8 STGD1 c.4537_4538insC, p.V1686M M 49 OS Brown White 20/50 (0.40) P9 STGD1 p.R1108H, p.P1380L M 50 OS Blue White 20/200 (1.00) P10 STGD1 c.5714&#fe;5G>A F 34 OD Blue White 20/200 (1.00) P11 STGD1 p.Q636H, p.G1961E M 46 OD Brown Indian 20/400 (1.30) P12 STGD1 c.5461-10T>C M 35 OD Brown Black 20/400 (1.30) P13 STGD1 p.R1640W F 20 OD Brown Black 20/125 (0.80) P14 STGD1 p.R290W M 47 OS Brown White 20/40 (0.30) P15 STGD1 p.A1773V, p.G1961E M 18 OD Brown White 20/150 (0.88) P16 AD RP p.T17M* F 23 OD Brown Hispanic 20/30 (0.20) P17 AD RP N/A M 39 OS Brown White 20/20 (0.00) P18 AR RP N/A M 50 OS Green White 20/20 (0.00) AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; F, female; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; M, male; N/A, not available. Login to comment

[hide] Quantitative fundus autofluorescence in recessive ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 1;55(5):2841-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13624. Burke TR, Duncker T, Woods RL, Greenberg JP, Zernant J, Tsang SH, Smith RT, Allikmets R, Sparrow JR, Delori FC
Quantitative fundus autofluorescence in recessive Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 1;55(5):2841-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13624., [PMID:24677105]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To quantify fundus autofluorescence (qAF) in patients with recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). METHODS: A total of 42 STGD1 patients (ages: 7-52 years) with at least one confirmed disease-associated ABCA4 mutation were studied. Fundus AF images (488-nm excitation) were acquired with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope equipped with an internal fluorescent reference to account for variable laser power and detector sensitivity. The gray levels (GLs) of each image were calibrated to the reference, zero GL, magnification, and normative optical media density to yield qAF. Texture factor (TF) was calculated to characterize inhomogeneities in the AF image and patients were assigned to the phenotypes of Fishman I through III. RESULTS: Quantified fundus autofluorescence in 36 of 42 patients and TF in 27 of 42 patients were above normal limits for age. Young patients exhibited the relatively highest qAF, with levels up to 8-fold higher than healthy eyes. Quantified fundus autofluorescence and TF were higher in Fishman II and III than Fishman I, who had higher qAF and TF than healthy eyes. Patients carrying the G1916E mutation had lower qAF and TF than most other patients, even in the presence of a second allele associated with severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: Quantified fundus autofluorescence is an indirect approach to measuring RPE lipofuscin in vivo. We report that ABCA4 mutations cause significantly elevated qAF, consistent with previous reports indicating that increased RPE lipofuscin is a hallmark of STGD1. Even when qualitative differences in fundus AF images are not evident, qAF can elucidate phenotypic variation. Quantified fundus autofluorescence will serve to establish genotype-phenotype correlations and as an outcome measure in clinical trials.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
48 Four other mutations were found in two to four patients: R1640W (four patients from three families); Y1557C (two patients from one family); G851D (two patients from one family); and R2030Q (two patients from two families). Login to comment
81 [L541P; A1038V]; p.R1640W 911 3.3 11.2 F 10 4 1.00 1.00 II - p. Login to comment
82 [L541P; A1038V]; p.R1640W 850 4.4 12 F 27 9 1.30 1.00 - III p.P1380L; p.P1380L 577 4.8 13 F 39 8 0.12 0.00 - I c.250_251insCAAA 616 2.3 14 M 23 4 0.88 0.60 - II p.C54Y 535 5.1 15.1 M 49 17 1.00 0.88 I I p.Y1557C 646 604 4.1 3.9 15.2 M 46 7 0.10 0.48 I I p.Y1557C 456 508 2.6 2.3 16.1 F 27 14 0.88 0.88 III III p.L2027F; p.G851D 448 459 6.0 6.3 16.2 F 29 19 1.30 1.18 III III p.L2027F; p.G851D 538 569 7.4 7.9 17 M 22 18 1.30 1.00 III III p.P1380L; p.R2030Q 434 411 5.7 6.0 18 M 37 16 0.70 0.70 I I p.G1961E; p.G1961E 281 279 2.6 2.2 19 F 33 5 0.88 0.70 I I p.G1961E; c.4540-2A > G 412 420 2.5 2.8 20 F 26 12 0.60 0.60 - I p.G1961E; p. Login to comment
83 [L541P; A1038V] 398 2.4 21 F 45 31 0.88 0.88 I I p.R1640W 647 613 2.6 2.8 22 M 43 7 1.00 0.00 - III p.A1773V; p.G1591G 640 6.9 23 F 41 1 0.10 CF II II p.P1486L; p.A1598D 613 572 6.0 6.5 24 F 19 4 0.60 0.70 I - p.G1961E; p.P1380L 368 2.4 25 F 23 4 0.88 0.80 - I p. Login to comment
85 [L541P; A1038V]; p.L2027F 733 749 3.9 4.0 36 F 20 7 0.88 1.00 II II p.R1640W 571 552 3.4 3.8 37 F 12 3 0.80 0.80 I I p.R1108C; p.Q1412* 536 501 1.7 1.7 * All subjects were white, except for patients 10, 22, and 36 who were Indian, Hispanic, and black, respectively. Login to comment
180 The mutations were confirmed in six or more patients (G1961E, L541P/A1038V, L2027F, and P1380L) or in two to four patients (R1640W, Y1557C, G851D, and R2030Q). Login to comment

[hide] Molecular diagnostic testing by eyeGENE: analysis ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 31;55(9):5510-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14359. Alapati A, Goetz K, Suk J, Navani M, Al-Tarouti A, Jayasundera T, Tumminia SJ, Lee P, Ayyagari R
Molecular diagnostic testing by eyeGENE: analysis of patients with hereditary retinal dystrophy phenotypes involving central vision loss.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 31;55(9):5510-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14359., [PMID:25082885]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To analyze the genetic test results of probands referred to eyeGENE with a diagnosis of hereditary maculopathy. METHODS: Patients with Best macular dystrophy (BMD), Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy (DHRD), Sorsby fundus dystrophy (SFD), or late-onset retinal degeneration (LORD) were screened for mutations in BEST1, EFEMP1, TIMP3, and CTRP5, respectively. Patients with pattern dystrophy (PD) were screened for mutations in PRPH2, BEST1, ELOVL4, CTRP5, and ABCA4; patients with cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) were screened for mutations in CRX, ABCA4, PRPH2, ELOVL4, and the c.2513G>A p.Arg838His variant in GUCY2D. Mutation analysis was performed by dideoxy sequencing. Impact of novel variants was evaluated using the computational tool PolyPhen. RESULTS: Among the 213 unrelated patients, 38 had BMD, 26 DHRD, 74 PD, 8 SFD, 6 LORD, and 54 CRD; six had both PD and BMD, and one had no specific clinical diagnosis. BEST1 variants were identified in 25 BMD patients, five with novel variants of unknown significance (VUS). Among the five patients with VUS, one was diagnosed with both BMD and PD. A novel EFEMP1 variant was identified in one DHRD patient. TIMP3 novel variants were found in two SFD patients, PRPH2 variants in 14 PD patients, ABCA4 variants in four PD patients, and p.Arg838His GUCY2D mutation in six patients diagnosed with dominant CRD; one patient additionally had a CRX VUS. ABCA4 mutations were identified in 15 patients with recessive CRD. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 213 samples, 55 patients (26%) had known causative mutations, and 13 (6%) patients had a VUS that was possibly pathogenic. Overall, selective screening for mutations in BEST1, PRPH2, and ABCA4 would likely yield the highest success rate in identifying the genetic basis for macular dystrophy phenotypes. Because of the overlap in phenotypes between BMD and PD, it would be beneficial to screen genes associated with both diseases.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
39 Mutations and Unknown Variants Detected in Patients With Central Vision Loss Patient Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Molecular Diagnosis Late-onset retinal degeneration NA CTRP5 NA NA NA NA NA NA Sorsby fundus dystrophy Patient 1 TIMP3 1 c.113C>G p.Ser38Cys Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 2 TIMP3 1 c.113C>G p.Ser38Cys Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 3 TIMP3 5 c.610A>T p.Ser204Cys Het Mut Positive Doyne honeycomb dystrophy Patient 1 EFEMP1 9 c.1033C>T p.Arg345Trp Het Mut Positive Patient 2 EFEMP1 9 c.1033C>T p.Arg345Trp Het Mut Positive Patient 3 EFEMP1 IVS10 c.IVS10-14C>T None Het vAR/us NA NA Unconfirmed Best macular dystrophy Patient 1 BEST1 2 c.28G>A p.Ala10Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 2 BEST1 2 c.47C>T p.Ser16Phe Het Mut Positive Patient 3 BEST1 2 c.72G>T p.Trp24Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 4 BEST1 3 c.240C>A p.Phe80Leu Het Mut Positive Patient 5 BEST1 3 c.240C>A p.Phe80Leu Het Mut Positive Patient 6 BEST1 4 c.248G>C p.Gly83Ala Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 7 BEST1 4 c.277T>C p.Trp93Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 8 BEST1 4 c.279G>C p.Trp93Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 9 BEST1 6 c.652C>T p.Arg218Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 10 BEST1 6 c.652C>T p.Arg218Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 11 BEST1 6 c.680A>G p.Tyr227Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 12 BEST1 6 c.741G>A p.Arg218His Het Mut Positive Patient 13 BEST1 6 c.741G>A p.Arg218His Het Mut Positive Patient 14 BEST1 7 c.727G>A p.Ala243Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 15 BEST1 7 c.727G>A p.Ala243Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 16 BEST1 7 c.728C>T p.Ala243Val Het Mut Positive Patient 17 BEST1 7 c.728C>T p.Ala243Val Het Mut Positive Patient 18 BEST1 8 c.880C>T p.Leu294Phe Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 19 BEST1 8 c.887A>G p.Asn296Ser Het Mut Positive Patient 20 BEST1 8 c.903T>G p.Asp301Glu Het Mut Positive Patient 21 BEST1 8 c.903T>G p.Asp301Glu Het Mut Positive Patient 22 BEST1 8 c.910G>A p.Asp304Asn Het Mut Positive Patient 23 BEST1 8 c.925T>C p.Trp309Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 24 BEST1 8 c.929T>C p.Ile310Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 25, case 3 BEST1 4 c.250T>G p.Phe84Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Pattern dystrophy Patient 1 ABCA4 6 c.634C>T p.Arg212Cys Het Mut Positive ABCA4 30 c.4469G>A p.Cys1490Tyr Het Mut Patient 2 ABCA4 17 c.2588G>C p.Gly863Ala Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 3 ABCA4 IVS26 c.3862&#fe;3A>G Abnormal splicing Het vAR/us Unconfirmed Patient 4 PRPH2 1 c.271T>A p.Tyr91Asn Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.909 Positive PRPH2 1 c.310-313del(AT) p.Ile104Val Het Mut Patient 5, case 6 PRPH2 1 c.422A>G p.Tyr141Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 6 PRPH2 1 c.422A>G p.Tyr141Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 7 PRPH2 1 c.515G>A p.Arg172Gln Het Mut Positive Patient 8 PRPH2 2 c.583C>T p.Arg195Stop Het Mut Positive Patient 9 PRPH2 2 c.629C>G p.Pro210Arg Het Mut Positive Patient 10 PRPH2 2 c.635G>C p.Ser212Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 11 PRPH2 2 c.683C>T p.Thr228Ile Het Mut Positive Patient 12 PRPH2 2 c.708C>G p.Tyr236Stop Het Mut Positive Patient 13, case 4 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut Positive TABLE 2. Continued Patient Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Molecular Diagnosis Patient 14 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut Positive Patient 15 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut Positive Patient 16 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut Positive Patient 17, case 2 ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 18 PRPH2 2 c.584G>A p.Arg195Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Cone-rod dystrophy Patient 1, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2512C>T p.Arg838Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 2, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive Patient 3, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive Patient 4, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive Patient 5, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive CRX 3 c.607T>C p.Ser213Pro Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.999 Patient 6, recessive ABCA4 2 c.156T>G p.His52Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.998 Positive ABCA4 3 c.161G>A p.Cys54Tyr Het Mut ABCA4 28 c.4169T>C p.Leu1390Pro Het Mut Patient 7, recessive ABCA4 16 c.2385C>T p.Ser795Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.99 Positive ABCA4 IVS40 c.5714&#fe;5G>A Splice Het Mut Patient 8, recessive ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Het Mut Positive ABCA4 45 c.6221G>T p.Gly2074Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Patient 9, recessive ABCA4 IVS42 c.5898&#fe;1G<A Splice Het Mut Positive ABCA4 IVS42 c.5899-2delA Splice Het Mut Patient 10, recessive ABCA4 5 c.559C>T p.Arg187Cys Het Mut Positive ABCA4 40 c.5645T>C p.Met1882Thr Het Mut Patient 11, recessive ABCA4 6 c.768G>T p.Val256Val (abnlspl) Het Mut Positive ABCA4 31 c.4577C>T p.Thr1526Met Het Mut Patient 12, recessive ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Het Mut Positive ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Het Mut ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Hom Mut ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Hom Mut ABCA4 22 c.3322C>T p.Arg1108Cys Het Mut Patient 13, recessive ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Hom Mut Positive ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Hom Mut Patient 14, recessive ABCA4 13 c.1927G>A p.Val643Met Het Mut Positive ABCA4 24 c.3602T>G p.Leu1201Arg Het Mut ABCA4 36 c.5186T>C p.Leu1729Pro Het Mut Patient 15, recessive ABCA4 23 c.3364G>A p.Glu1122Lys Het Mut Positive ABCA4 48 c.6529G>A p.Asp2177Asn Het Mut Patient 16, recessive ABCA4 35 c.4918C>T p.Arg1640Trp Het Mut Positive ABCA4 28 c.4222T>C p.Trp1408Arg Het Mut Patient 17, recessive ABCA4 11 c.1532G>A p.Arg511His Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 18, recessive ABCA4 27 c.3899G>A p.Arg1300Gln Het vAR/us Benign 0.143 Unconfirmed Patient 19, recessive ABCA4 13 c.1933G>A p.Asp645Asn Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 20, recessive ABCA4 35 c.4918C>T p.Arg1640Trp Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 21, recessive ABCA4 IVS7 c.859-9T>C Unknown Hom vAR/us NA NA Unconfirmed Molecular Diagnostic Testing by eyeGENE IOVS j September 2014 j Vol. 55 j No. 9 j were screened for the p.Arg838His mutation in GUCY2D, and mutations in the CRX, ELOVL4, PRPH2, and/or ABCA4 genes. Login to comment
116 Mutations or Unknown Variants Detected in Patients With Central Vision Loss Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Frequency* Variant ID Late-onset retinal degeneration CTRP5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Sorsby fundus dystrophy TIMP3 1 c.113C>G p.Ser38Cys Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 2 TIMP3 5 c.610A>T p.Ser204Cys Het Mut 1 CM941325/ rs137853298 Doyne honeycomb dystrophy EFEMP1 9 c.1033C>T p.Arg345Trp Het Mut 2 CM990504 EFEMP1 IVS10 c.IVS10-14C>T None Het vAR/us NA NA 1 Best macular dystrophy BEST1 2 c.28G>A p.Ala10Thr Het Mut 1 CM982017 BEST1 2 c.47C>T p.Ser16Phe Het Mut 1 CM010520 BEST1 2 c.72G>T p.Trp24Cys Het Mut 1 CM982018 BEST1 3 c.240C>A p.Phe80Leu Het Mut 2 CM004423 BEST1 4 c.248G>C p.Gly83Ala Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 4 c.277T>C p.Trp93Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 4 c.279G>C p.Trp93Cys Het Mut 1 rs28940273/ CM982021 BEST1 6 c.652C>T p.Arg218Cys Het Mut 2 CM982023 BEST1 6 c.680A>G p.Tyr227Cys Het Mut 1 CM982024 BEST1 6 c.741G>A p.Arg218His Het Mut 2 CM003486 BEST1 7 c.727G>A p.Ala243Thr Het Mut 2 CM004434 BEST1 7 c.728C>T p.Ala243Val Het Mut 2 rs28940570/ CM00841 BEST1 8 c.880C>T p.Leu294Phe Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 8 c.887A>G p.Asn296Ser Het Mut 1 CM010524 BEST1 8 c.903T>G p.Asp301Glu Het Mut 2 CM991243 BEST1 8 c.910G>A p.Asp304Asn Het Mut 1 CM024219 BEST1 8 c.925T>C p.Trp309Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 8 c.929T>C p.Ile310Thr Het Mut 1 CM000843 BEST1 4 c.250T>G p.Phe84Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 Pattern dystrophy ABCA4 6 c.634C>T p.Arg212Cys Het Mut 1 rs61750200 ABCA4 17 c.2588G>C p.Gly863Ala Het Mut 1 CM970003/ rs76157638 ABCA4 IVS26 c.3862&#fe;3A>G Abnormal splicing Het vAR/us 1 NA ABCA4 30 c.4469G>A p.Cys1490Tyr Het Mut 1 CM990056/ rs61751402 ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut 1 CS057513 PRPH2 1 c.271T>A p.Tyr91Asn Het vAR/us Probably damaging .909 1 PRPH2 1 c.310-313del(AT) p.Ile104Val Het Mut 1 NA/Deletion PRPH2 1 c.422A>G p.Tyr141Cys Het Mut 2 CM010125/ rs61755781 PRPH2 1 c.515G>A p.Arg172Gln Het Mut 1 CM930637/ rs61755792 PRPH2 2 c.583C>T p.Arg195Stop Het Mut 1 CM032999 PRPH2 2 c.629C>G p.Pro210Arg Het Mut 1 CM941210 PRPH2 2 c.635G>C p.Ser212Thr Het Mut 1 CM971289/ rs61755801 PRPH2 2 c.683C>T p.Thr228Ile Het Mut 1 TMP_ESP_6_ 42672248 PRPH2 2 c.708C>G p.Tyr236Stop Het Mut 1 rs61755813 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut 4 CS010139 PRPH2 2 c.584G>A p.Arg195Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 TABLE 3. Continued Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Frequency* Variant ID Cone-rod dystrophy ABCA4 2 c.156T>G p.His52Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.998 1 ABCA4 3 c.161G>A p.Cys54Tyr Het Mut 1 CM990012/ rs150774447 ABCA4 28 c.4169T>C p.Leu1390Pro Het Mut 1 CM014810/ rs61752430 ABCA4 16 c.2385C>T p.Ser795Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.99 1 ABCA4 IVS40 c.5714&#fe;5G>A Splice Het Mut 1 CS982057 ABCA4 27 c.3899G>A p.Arg1300Gln Het vAR/us Benign 0.143 1 ABCA4 32 c.4661A>G p.Glu1554Gly Het vAR/us Benign 0.326 1 ABCA4 30 c.4383G>A p.Trp1461Stop Het Mut 1 Stop/NA ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut NA NA 2 CS057513 ABCA4 22 c.3259G>A p.Glu1087Lys Het Mut 1 CM970008/ rs61751398 ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Het Mut 2 CM970016/ rs1800553 ABCA4 45 c.6221G>T p.Gly2074Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 ABCA4 IVS42 c.5898&#fe;1G<A Splice Het Mut 1 CS011524 ABCA4 IVS42 c.5899-2delA Splice Het Mut 1 rs3112831 CRX 3 c.607T>C p.Ser213Pro Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.999 1 ABCA4 5 c.559C>T p.Arg187Cys Het Mut 1 COSM913472 ABCA4 40 c.5645T>C p.Met1882Thr Het Mut 1 rs4147830 ABCA4 6 c.768G>T p.Val256Val (abnlspl) Het Mut 1 CM990057/ rs61750152 ABCA4 31 c.4577C>T p.Thr1526Met Het Mut 1 rs62645944 ABCA4 11 c.1532G>A p.Arg511His Het Mut 1 rs140482171 ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Het Mut 1 CM990022/ rs61751392 ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Het Mut 1 CM970006/ rs61751374 ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Hom Mut 2 CM990022/ rs61751392 ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Hom Mut 2 CM970006/ rs61751374 ABCA4 22 c.3322C>T p.Arg1108Cys Het Mut 1 CM990039/ rs61750120 ABCA4 13 c.1927G>A p.Val643Met Het Mut 1 CM014293/ rs61749417/ rs143548435 ABCA4 24 c.3602T>G p.Leu1201Arg Het Mut 1 CM990042/ rs61750126 ABCA4 36 c.5186T>C p.Leu1729Pro Het Mut 1 CM990062/ rs61750567 ABCA4 13 c.1933G>A p.Asp645Asn Het Mut 1 rs617494181933 ABCA4 23 c.3364G>A p.Glu1122Lys Het Mut 1 CM990041 ABCA4 48 c.6529G>A p.Asp2177Asn Het Mut 1 CM970023/ rs1800555 ABCA4 35 c.4918C>T p.Arg1640Trp Het Mut 2 CM983728/ rs61751404 ABCA4 28 c.4222T>C p.Trp1408Arg Het Mut 1 CM990048/ rs61750135 GUCY2D 13 c.2512C>T p.Arg838Cys Het Mut 1 rs61750172 GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut 5 CM012606/ rs61750173 ABCA4 IVS7 c.859-9T>C Unknown Hom vAR/us NA NA 1 ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Hom Mut 1 CM970016/ rs1800553 ABCA4 43 c.5917delG Deletion Hom Mut 1 RISN_ABCR: c.5917delG Molecular Diagnostic Testing by eyeGENE IOVS j September 2014 j Vol. 55 j No. 9 j Six patients with late-onset retinal pathology and drusen had well-characterized clinical data. Login to comment

[hide] The external limiting membrane in early-onset Star... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Aug 19;55(10):6139-49. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15126. Lee W, Noupuu K, Oll M, Duncker T, Burke T, Zernant J, Bearelly S, Tsang SH, Sparrow JR, Allikmets R
The external limiting membrane in early-onset Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Aug 19;55(10):6139-49. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15126., [PMID:25139735]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe pathologic changes of the external limiting membrane (ELM) in young patients with early-onset Stargardt (STGD1) disease. METHODS: Twenty-six STGD1 patients aged younger than 20 years with confirmed disease-causing adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette, subfamily A, member 4 (ABCA4) alleles and 30 age-matched unaffected individuals were studied. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence (AF), and color fundus photography (CFP) images, as well as full-field electroretinograms were obtained and analyzed for one to four visits in each patient. RESULTS: The ELM in all patients exhibited a distinct thickening that was not observed in unaffected individuals. In addition, accumulations of reflective deposits were noted in the outer nuclear layer in every patient. Four patients exhibited a concave protuberance or bulging of a thickened and hyperreflective ELM band within the fovea containing preserved photoreceptors. Longitudinal SD-OCT data in several patients revealed the persistence of this ELM abnormality over a period of time (1-4 years). Furthermore, the edges of the inner segment ellipsoid band appeared to recede earlier than the ELM band in active lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Structural changes seen in the ELM of this cohort may reflect a gliotic response to cellular stress at the photoreceptor level in early-onset STGD1.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
90 [L541P;A1038V] p.R1640W P14 12 Caucasian 20/200 (1.00) 20/200 (1.00) 2 2 Late 6 p. Login to comment
91 [L541P;A1038V] p.R1640W P15 16 Caucasian 20/200 (1.00) 20/200 (1.00) 2 n/a Mid-late 8 p.K346T p.T1117I P16 9 Caucasian 20/150 (0.88) 20/150 (0.88) 1 n/a 1 p.P1380L p.G1961E P17 18 Caucasian 20/40 (0.30) 20/150 (0.88) 1 1 Early 3 p.P1380L p.G1961E P18ߥ 18 Caucasian 20/150 (0.88) 20/150 (0.88) 2 1 Late 4 p. Login to comment
93 [W1408R;R1640W] P20 18 African American 20/125 (0.80) 20/50 (0.40) 2 2 Mid 5 p.R1640W ND P21 12 Caucasian 20/50 (0.40) 20/50 (0.40) 1 1 6 p.W821R p.C2150Y P22 17 Indian 20/40 (0.30) 20/100 (0.70) 1 n/a Mid 3 p.G1961E c.6729&#fe;4_&#fe;18del P23 10 Indian 20/400 (1.30) 20/400 (1.30) 2 2 Early 3 c.885delC p.R537C P24 19 Caucasian 20/20 (0.00) 20/20 (0.00) 1 n/a ND p.G863A c.5898&#fe;1G>A P25 16 Middle Eastern 20/80 (0.60) 20/100 (0.70) 1 1 4 p.A1773V p.G1961E P26 17 Caucasian 20/150 (0.88) 20/200 (1.00) 1 1 2 p.K1547* p.R2030Q ND, not determined; n/a, not available. Login to comment