ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Gly314Gln

ClinVar:	c.940G>C , p.Gly314Arg ? , not provided c.941G>T , p.Gly314Val ? , not provided c.941G>A , p.Gly314Glu ? , not provided
CF databases:	c.941G>T , p.Gly314Val (CFTR1) D , This mutation was found in a CF patient homozygous for this mutation. He was diagnosed as CF at 32 years. c.940G>C , p.Gly314Arg (CFTR1) D , This mutation was detected by chemical mismatch and sequencing. The mutation is a G to C change at nucleotide 1072. This results in a glycine to arginine substitution at amino acid 314 (G314R). It is in exon 7 and it eliminates a DdeI restriction site. This mutation was found in a patient with an American Indian/Caucasian mother and Dutch/French father. This patient has a [delta]F508 mutation on the other chromosomes and is pancreatic insufficient. This mutation was not found in 25 normal chromosomes and 25 CF chromosomes. c.941G>A , p.Gly314Glu (CFTR1) ? , This mutation, in exon 7 of the CFTR gene, was found by direct sequencing and the second mutation is [delta]F508. The patient is 7 years old. Diagnosis of CF was established at the age of five after severe lung infection. Sweat gland tests were positive. She is receiveing pancreatic enzyme supplements and long-term antibiotic treatment.
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (85%), C: D (91%), D: D (95%), E: D (66%), F: D (95%), H: D (95%), I: D (95%), K: D (95%), L: D (95%), M: D (95%), N: D (91%), P: D (95%), Q: D (95%), R: D (71%), S: D (80%), T: D (91%), V: D (95%), W: D (95%), Y: D (95%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: N, C: N, D: N, E: N, F: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: N, Y: N,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] CFTR: mechanism of anion conduction. Physiol Rev. 1999 Jan;79(1 Suppl):S47-75. Dawson DC, Smith SS, Mansoura MK
CFTR: mechanism of anion conduction.
Physiol Rev. 1999 Jan;79(1 Suppl):S47-75., [PMID:9922376]

Abstract [show]
CFTR: Mechanism of Anion Conduction. Physiol. Rev. 79, Suppl.: S47-S75, 1999. - The purpose of this review is to collect together the results of recent investigations of anion conductance by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator along with some of the basic background that is a prerequisite for developing some physical picture of the conduction process. The review begins with an introduction to the concepts of permeability and conductance and the Nernst-Planck and rate theory models that are used to interpret these parameters. Some of the physical forces that impinge on anion conductance are considered in the context of permeability selectivity and anion binding to proteins. Probes of the conduction process are considered, particularly permeant anions that bind tightly within the pore and block anion flow. Finally, structure-function studies are reviewed in the context of some predictions for the origin of pore properties.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
425 Iodide permeation ing must be interpreted with caution for a number of reasons. First, it has been demonstrated (101) that the In any survey of the permeation of monatomic and polyatomic anions through CFTR, iodide stands out asCFTR mutations (e.g., G314Q or G314E) result in CFTR channels that exhibit markedly reduced anion binding, exhibiting some unique, or perhaps exaggerated, properties. Login to comment
597 Transmembrane segment 2 and TM6 sequences formed anion-selective channels in bilayers,the site of two patient mutations, and found that SCN block of CFTR was abolished in G314E and G314Q CFTR, whereas peptides based on TM1, TM3, TM4, and TM5 did not. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulato... Biophys J. 1998 Mar;74(3):1320-32. Mansoura MK, Smith SS, Choi AD, Richards NW, Strong TV, Drumm ML, Collins FS, Dawson DC
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) anion binding as a probe of the pore.
Biophys J. 1998 Mar;74(3):1320-32., [PMID:9512029]

Abstract [show]
We compared the effects of mutations in transmembrane segments (TMs) TM1, TM5, and TM6 on the conduction and activation properties of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) to determine which functional property was most sensitive to mutations and, thereby, to develop a criterion for measuring the importance of a particular residue or TM for anion conduction or activation. Anion substitution studies provided strong evidence for the binding of permeant anions in the pore. Anion binding was highly sensitive to point mutations in TM5 and TM6. Permeability ratios, in contrast, were relatively unaffected by the same mutations, so that anion binding emerged as the conduction property most sensitive to structural changes in CFTR. The relative insensitivity of permeability ratios to CFTR mutations was in accord with the notion that anion-water interactions are important determinants of permeability selectivity. By the criterion of anion binding, TM5 and TM6 were judged to be likely to contribute to the structure of the anion-selective pore, whereas TM1 was judged to be less important. Mutations in TM5 and TM6 also dramatically reduced the sensitivity of CFTR to activation by 3-isobutyl 1-methyl xanthine (IBMX), as expected if these TMs are intimately involved in the physical process that opens and closes the channel.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
62 Expression levels Wild-type and 11 mutant CFTR constructs were used in this study: G91A, G91E, G91R, G314A, G314D, G314E, G314Q, K335R, K335A, K335D, and K335E. Login to comment
116 It was of particular interest that the introduction of a glutamine (G314Q) also produced increased conductance ratios for the highly permeant anions and I, whereas the aspartic-acid-substituted construct (G314D) was not different from wtCFTR. Login to comment
136 In the case of the G314E and G314Q mutants, however, the SCN effect appeared to be moderately voltage dependent (Fig. 2 TABLE 2 Summary of permeability and conductance ratios from anion substitution experiments n SCN NO3 Br HCOO I A. Login to comment
137 Permeability Ratios Wild type 4-9 3.42 Ϯ 0.28 1.42 Ϯ 0.04 1.22 Ϯ 0.02 0.39 Ϯ 0.01 0.44 Ϯ 0.03 G91A 3-6 3.24 Ϯ 0.26 1.53 Ϯ 0.04 1.27 Ϯ 0.02 0.37 Ϯ 0.04 0.40 Ϯ 0.04 G91E 3-7 3.50 Ϯ 0.54 1.59 Ϯ 0.04 1.27 Ϯ 0.01 0.35 Ϯ 0.01 0.51 Ϯ 0.04 G91R 3-4 5.26 ؎ 0.46* 1.60 Ϯ 0.03 1.40 ؎ 0.01* 0.32 Ϯ 0.04 0.64 ؎ 0.04* G314A 3-4 2.87 Ϯ 0.17 1.45 Ϯ 0.03 1.19 Ϯ 0.02 0.31 Ϯ 0.03 0.33 Ϯ 0.03 G314D 4 3.42 Ϯ 0.34 1.44 Ϯ 0.05 1.25 Ϯ 0.04 0.33 Ϯ 0.03 0.51 Ϯ 0.05 G314E 3-4 3.72 Ϯ 0.56 1.65 ؎ 0.09* 1.35 ؎ 0.03* 0.49 Ϯ 0.04 0.53 Ϯ 0.04 G314Q 3-4 3.89 Ϯ 0.37 1.62 Ϯ 0.11 1.27 Ϯ 0.04 0.36 Ϯ 0.03 0.62 Ϯ 0.05 K335R 3-5 3.44 Ϯ 0.29 1.35 Ϯ 0.04 1.22 Ϯ 0.03 0.40 Ϯ 0.05 0.41 Ϯ 0.07 K335A 5-6 5.34 ؎ 0.58* 1.48 Ϯ 0.06 1.28 Ϯ 0.04 0.37 Ϯ 0.03 0.60 Ϯ 0.06 K335D 4-6 3.02 Ϯ 0.19 1.50 Ϯ 0.03 1.10 ؎ 0.02* 0.54 ؎ 0.04* 0.65 ؎ 0.06* K335E 5-8 3.64 Ϯ 0.21 1.48 Ϯ 0.06 1.29 Ϯ 0.03 0.46 Ϯ 0.04 1.10 ؎ 0.04* B. Conductance Ratios Wild type 4-9 0.14 Ϯ 0.02 0.75 Ϯ 0.02 0.64 Ϯ 0.02 0.52 Ϯ 0.03 0.18 Ϯ 0.03 G91A 3-6 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 0.77 Ϯ 0.02 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.47 Ϯ 0.02 0.19 Ϯ 0.02 G91E 3-7 0.15 Ϯ 0.03 0.73 Ϯ 0.02 0.60 Ϯ 0.01 0.50 Ϯ 0.04 0.30 Ϯ 0.02 G91R 3-4 0.14 Ϯ 0.00 0.84 Ϯ 0.01 0.63 Ϯ 0.01 0.32 ؎ 0.01* 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 G314A 3-4 0.30 Ϯ 0.09 0.89 ؎ 0.01* 0.66 Ϯ 0.01 0.48 Ϯ 0.09 0.24 Ϯ 0.01 G314D 4 0.28 Ϯ 0.05 0.82 Ϯ 0.01 0.70 Ϯ 0.02 0.49 Ϯ 0.06 0.27 Ϯ 0.03 G314E 3-4 0.62 ؎ 0.07* 1.18 ؎ 0.04* 0.84 ؎ 0.05* 0.42 Ϯ 0.05 0.29 Ϯ 0.09 G314Q 3-4 0.63 ؎ 0.02* 1.01 ؎ 0.04* 0.82 ؎ 0.03* 0.50 Ϯ 0.02 0.42 ؎ 0.02* K335R 3-5 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 0.76 Ϯ 0.03 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.59 Ϯ 0.06 0.16 Ϯ 0.03 K335A 6 0.20 Ϯ 0.03 0.77 Ϯ 0.02 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.45 Ϯ 0.03 0.21 Ϯ 0.02 K335D 4-6 0.65 ؎ 0.04* 1.25 ؎ 0.02* 0.89 ؎ 0.02* 0.61 Ϯ 0.06 0.58 ؎ 0.06* K335E 5-8 0.50 ؎ 0.06* 1.19 ؎ 0.03* 0.89 ؎ 0.02* 0.53 Ϯ 0.03 0.48 ؎ 0.03* (A) The apparent permeability ratios (PS/PCl) for each substitute anion were calculated from the shift in reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz relation (noted in Materials and Methods). Login to comment
147 The data in Table 3 show that for wtCFTR and G314Q and G314E, two of the most severely affected constructs, PSCN/PCl calculated from the shift in Vr was independent of the fractional abundance of [SCN]o. Login to comment
169 TABLE 4 Quantitative analyses of the macroscopic I-V shape changes Mutant ⌬ Net charge n RR g(ϩ30)/g(-30) RR/RRWT Wild type 5 1.220 Ϯ 0.06 1.00 G91A 0 4 1.293 Ϯ 0.06 1.06 G91E -1 5 1.512 ؎ 0.10* 1.24 G91R 1 4 8.041 ؎ 0.87* 6.59 G314A 0 4 1.201 Ϯ 0.09 0.98 G314D -1 4 1.362 Ϯ 0.08 1.12 G314E -1 7 1.405 Ϯ 0.08 1.15 G314Q 0 5 1.376 Ϯ 0.10 1.13 K335R 0 4 1.209 Ϯ 0.06 0.99 K335A -1 4 1.295 Ϯ 0.07 1.06 K335D -2 5 0.762 ؎ 0.02* 0.62 K335E -2 4 0.919 ؎ 0.02* 0.75 The slope conductance was measured at ϩ30 mV and -30 mV with respect to the reversal potential. Login to comment
171 TABLE 3 The permeability ratio (PSCN/PCl) is independent of the mole fraction of [SCN]0 for wtCFTR and the G314 variants [SCN]/{[SCN]ϩ[Cl]} n PSCN/PCl 0.02 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.50 0.90 Wild type 12 3.82 Ϯ 0.50 4.43 Ϯ 0.57 4.58 Ϯ 0.48 4.69 Ϯ 0.43 4.66 Ϯ 0.38 4.44 Ϯ 0.35 G314A 9 4.32 Ϯ 0.73 3.78 Ϯ 0.53 3.81 Ϯ 0.47 3.79 Ϯ 0.34 3.82 Ϯ 0.29 3.72 Ϯ 0.25 G314D 3 2.99 Ϯ 0.26 2.56 Ϯ 1.05 2.82 Ϯ 1.07 2.68 Ϯ 0.97 2.87 Ϯ 0.65 2.89 Ϯ 0.43 G314E 6 4.48 Ϯ 1.05 4.01 Ϯ 0.69 4.17 Ϯ 0.62 4.15 Ϯ 0.59 3.96 Ϯ 0.41 3.82 Ϯ 0.40 G314Q 3 5.39 Ϯ 0.57 4.49 Ϯ 0.58 4.69 Ϯ 1.26 4.05 Ϯ 1.26 3.86 Ϯ 1.47 3.68 Ϯ 1.51 The permeability ratios were calculated from the shift in reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation. Login to comment
173 TABLE 5 Concentration-dependent activation of wtCFTR, G91, G314, and K335 variants by IBMX in the presence of 10 ␮M forskolin Mutant n K1/2(IBMX) (mM) Wild type 15 0.35 Ϯ 0.04 G91A 5 0.42 Ϯ 0.06 G91E 8 0.51 ؎ 0.06* G91R 5 0.49 Ϯ 0.09 G314A 10 1.21 ؎ 0.11* G314D 3 1.35 ؎ 0.16* G314E 8 6.39 ؎ 1.35* G314Q 4 14.26 ؎ 6.64* K335R 4 0.46 Ϯ 0.04 K335A 2 0.35 Ϯ 0.15 K335D 7 0.87 ؎ 0.13* K335E 3 0.95 ؎ 0.07* The steady-state slope conductance was measured at -60 mV as increasing concentrations of IBMX (0.02-5.0 mM) were added to the perfusate in the continued presence of 10 mM forskolin. Login to comment
175 Note that this fitting procedure allows us to estimate K1/2 values for even the most insensitive constructs, G314E and G314Q, despite the fact that these values were greater than the highest concentration of IBMX used in this study. Login to comment
178 The K1/2 seen with either G314E or G314Q was comparable to that seen with nucleotide-binding mutations such as G551D that are associated with severe CF (Wilkinson et al., 1996). Login to comment
195 The pattern of the effect of anion substitution was identical for Br, NO3, and SCN, and the conductance ratio for all three ions was increased in G314E and G314Q CFTR channels. Login to comment
198 The results presented here are consistent with the notion that the binding of anions within the CFTR pore is a sensitive indicator of changes in pore structure whereas permeability ratios appear to be rather insensitive to similar TABLE 6 Qualitative summary of the functional consequences of mutations at G91, G314, and K335 Property G91 (TM1) K335 (TM6) G314 (TM5) G91A G91E G91R K335R K335A K335D K335E G314A G314D G314E G314Q I-V shape - - ϩϩϩ - - ϩϩ ϩ - - - - Psub/PCl - - - - - - ϩϩ - - - - gsub/gCl - - - - - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩ - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ SCN- binding - - - - - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩ - ϩϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ Activation - - - - - ϩϩ ϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ Results are expressed as follows: -, function of the CFTR construct with the indicated substitution was indistinguishable from wild type; ϩ to ϩϩϩϩ, semiquantitative indication of the magnitude of the change in the function compared with wild type. Login to comment
233 The increased conductance ratios seen in G314E, G314Q, and to a lesser extent, G314A channels are compatible with the hypothesis that substitution for G314 distorted an anion binding site such that the affinities for Br, NO3, and SCN were all reduced relative to Cl. Login to comment
237 Furthermore, the dramatic reduction in SCN binding seen in G314Q CFTR demonstrates that the presence of arginines, such as R347, is not sufficient to induce tight anion binding in the pore. Login to comment
117 It was of particular interest that the introduction of a glutamine (G314Q) also produced increased conductance ratios for the highly permeant anions and I, whereas the aspartic-acid-substituted construct (G314D) was not different from wtCFTR. Login to comment
138 Permeability Ratios Wild type 4-9 3.42 afe; 0.28 1.42 afe; 0.04 1.22 afe; 0.02 0.39 afe; 0.01 0.44 afe; 0.03 G91A 3-6 3.24 afe; 0.26 1.53 afe; 0.04 1.27 afe; 0.02 0.37 afe; 0.04 0.40 afe; 0.04 G91E 3-7 3.50 afe; 0.54 1.59 afe; 0.04 1.27 afe; 0.01 0.35 afe; 0.01 0.51 afe; 0.04 G91R 3-4 5.26 d1e; 0.46* 1.60 afe; 0.03 1.40 d1e; 0.01* 0.32 afe; 0.04 0.64 d1e; 0.04* G314A 3-4 2.87 afe; 0.17 1.45 afe; 0.03 1.19 afe; 0.02 0.31 afe; 0.03 0.33 afe; 0.03 G314D 4 3.42 afe; 0.34 1.44 afe; 0.05 1.25 afe; 0.04 0.33 afe; 0.03 0.51 afe; 0.05 G314E 3-4 3.72 afe; 0.56 1.65 d1e; 0.09* 1.35 d1e; 0.03* 0.49 afe; 0.04 0.53 afe; 0.04 G314Q 3-4 3.89 afe; 0.37 1.62 afe; 0.11 1.27 afe; 0.04 0.36 afe; 0.03 0.62 afe; 0.05 K335R 3-5 3.44 afe; 0.29 1.35 afe; 0.04 1.22 afe; 0.03 0.40 afe; 0.05 0.41 afe; 0.07 K335A 5-6 5.34 d1e; 0.58* 1.48 afe; 0.06 1.28 afe; 0.04 0.37 afe; 0.03 0.60 afe; 0.06 K335D 4-6 3.02 afe; 0.19 1.50 afe; 0.03 1.10 d1e; 0.02* 0.54 d1e; 0.04* 0.65 d1e; 0.06* K335E 5-8 3.64 afe; 0.21 1.48 afe; 0.06 1.29 afe; 0.03 0.46 afe; 0.04 1.10 d1e; 0.04* B. Conductance Ratios Wild type 4-9 0.14 afe; 0.02 0.75 afe; 0.02 0.64 afe; 0.02 0.52 afe; 0.03 0.18 afe; 0.03 G91A 3-6 0.14 afe; 0.01 0.77 afe; 0.02 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.47 afe; 0.02 0.19 afe; 0.02 G91E 3-7 0.15 afe; 0.03 0.73 afe; 0.02 0.60 afe; 0.01 0.50 afe; 0.04 0.30 afe; 0.02 G91R 3-4 0.14 afe; 0.00 0.84 afe; 0.01 0.63 afe; 0.01 0.32 d1e; 0.01* 0.14 afe; 0.01 G314A 3-4 0.30 afe; 0.09 0.89 d1e; 0.01* 0.66 afe; 0.01 0.48 afe; 0.09 0.24 afe; 0.01 G314D 4 0.28 afe; 0.05 0.82 afe; 0.01 0.70 afe; 0.02 0.49 afe; 0.06 0.27 afe; 0.03 G314E 3-4 0.62 d1e; 0.07* 1.18 d1e; 0.04* 0.84 d1e; 0.05* 0.42 afe; 0.05 0.29 afe; 0.09 G314Q 3-4 0.63 d1e; 0.02* 1.01 d1e; 0.04* 0.82 d1e; 0.03* 0.50 afe; 0.02 0.42 d1e; 0.02* K335R 3-5 0.14 afe; 0.01 0.76 afe; 0.03 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.59 afe; 0.06 0.16 afe; 0.03 K335A 6 0.20 afe; 0.03 0.77 afe; 0.02 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.45 afe; 0.03 0.21 afe; 0.02 K335D 4-6 0.65 d1e; 0.04* 1.25 d1e; 0.02* 0.89 d1e; 0.02* 0.61 afe; 0.06 0.58 d1e; 0.06* K335E 5-8 0.50 d1e; 0.06* 1.19 d1e; 0.03* 0.89 d1e; 0.02* 0.53 afe; 0.03 0.48 d1e; 0.03* (A) The apparent permeability ratios (PS/PCl) for each substitute anion were calculated from the shift in reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz relation (noted in Materials and Methods). Login to comment
148 The data in Table 3 show that for wtCFTR and G314Q and G314E, two of the most severely affected constructs, PSCN/PCl calculated from the shift in Vr was independent of the fractional abundance of [SCN]o. Login to comment