ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Trp1089*

ClinVar:	c.3266G>A , p.Trp1089* D , Pathogenic
CF databases:	c.3266G>A , p.Trp1089* D , CF-causing

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Molecular analysis in Brazilian cystic fibrosis pa... Genet Test. 2000;4(1):69-74. Bernardino AL, Ferri A, Passos-Bueno MR, Kim CE, Nakaie CM, Gomes CE, Damaceno N, Zatz M
Molecular analysis in Brazilian cystic fibrosis patients reveals five novel mutations.
Genet Test. 2000;4(1):69-74., [PMID:10794365]

Abstract [show]
We have performed molecular genetic analyses on 160 Brazilian patients diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (CF). Screening of mutations in 320 CF chromosomes was performed through single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and heteroduplex analyses assay followed by DNA sequencing of the 27 exons and exon/intron boundaries of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The frequency of CFTR variants of T-tract length of intron 8 (IVS8 Tn) was also investigated. This analysis enabled the detection of 232/320 CF mutations (72.2%) and complete genotyping of 61% of the patients. The deltaF508 mutation was found in 48.4% of the alleles. Another fifteen mutations (previously reported) were detected: G542X, R1162X, N1303K, R334W, W1282X, G58E, L206W, R553X, 621+1G-->T, V232D, 1717-1G-->A, 2347 delG, R851L, 2789+5G-->A, and W1089X. Five novel mutations were identified, V201M (exon 6a), Y275X (exon 6b), 2686 insT (exon 14a), 3171 delC (exon 17a), and 3617 delGA (exon 19). These results contribute to the molecular characterization of CF in the Brazilian population. In addition, the identification of the novel mutation Y275X allowed prenatal diagnosis in a high-risk fetus.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
6 Another fifteen mutations (previously reported) were detected: G542X, R1162X, N1303K, R334W, W1282X, G58E, L206W, R553X, 6211 1GRT, V232D, 1717-1GRA, 2347 delG, R851L, 27891 5GRA, and W1089X. Login to comment
53 Seven other rare mutations were also identified : 6211 1GRT (exon 4), V232D (exon 6a), 1717-1G RA (intron 11), 2347 delG (exon 13b), R851L (exon 14a), 27891 5GRA (intron 14b), and W1089X (exon 17b). Login to comment
81 In this study, 16 mutations were identified: D F508, G542X, R1162X, N1303K, R334W, W1282X, G58E, L206W, R553X, 6211 1GRT, V232D, 1717-1GRA, 2347 delG, R851L, 27891 5GRA, and W1089X. Login to comment
84 GEN OTYPES, FREQUENCIES, AN D PRESENCE OF PI FRO M 160 CF PATIE NTS (320 CF CHROM OSOM ES) Number and frequency (%) Genotype Number Frequency (%) of patients with PI D F508/D F508 47 29.40 47 (100%) D F508/G542X 13 8.10 13 (100%) D F508/R1162X 6 3.80 6 (100%) D F508/R334W 5 3.10 3 (60%) D F508/N1303K 3 1.90 3 (100%) D F508/W1282X 2 1.20 2 (100%) D F508/G58E 2 1.20 1 (50%) D F508/L206W 1 0.62 0 D F508/R553X 1 0.62 1 (100%) D F508/R851L 1 0.62 0 D F508/2789 1 5g ® A 1 0.62 0 D F508/3617delGA 1 0.62 1 (100%) D F508/3171delC 1 0.62 1 (100%) D F508/2686insT 1 0.62 1 (100%) D F508/Y275X 1 0.62 1 (100%) D F508/U 22 13.80 14 (64%) G542X/G542X 3 1.90 3 (100%) G542X/N1303K 3 1.90 2 (67%) G542X/R1162X 1 0.62 1 (100%) G542X/U 5 3.10 4 (80%) N1303K/R1162X 1 0.62 1 (100%) N1303K/G58E 1 0.62 0 2347delG/2347delG 1 0.62 1 (100%) R334W/V232D 1 0.62 0 R334W/W1089X 1 0.62 1 (100%) R334W/U 1 0.62 1 (100%) W1282X/U 1 0.62 1 (100%) G58E/U 1 0.62 1 (100%) R553X/U 1 0.62 1 (100%) L206W/U 1 0.62 0 621 1 1G ® T/U 1 0.62 1 (100%) 1717-1G ® A/U 1 0.62 Not known V201M/U 1 0.62 0 U/U 27 16.90 12 (44%) Total 160 100 - U, Unknown CF mutation. Login to comment

[hide] Prevalence of cystic fibrosis mutations in Israeli... Genet Test. 2001 Spring;5(1):47-52. Orgad S, Neumann S, Loewenthal R, Netanelov-Shapira I, Gazit E
Prevalence of cystic fibrosis mutations in Israeli Jews.
Genet Test. 2001 Spring;5(1):47-52., [PMID:11336401]

Abstract [show]
The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening policies of cystic fibrosis (CF) in the Jewish population. The prevalence of mutations that account for CF in Israel have been defined in the past by determining the frequency of CF mutations in affected individuals. This study is a population-based study and is, therefore, different from previous patient-based studies. We found that the CF mutations D1152H, W1089X, and 405 + IG-->A were present in some ethnic groups in which no CF patients carrying these mutations were reported. These facts necessitate a reevaluation of the screening policy regarding the ethnic groups in Israel. We studied 9,430 healthy Jewish Israeli individuals of 36 countries of origin. The prevalence of CF mutations was 1:19, 1:19, 1:28, and 1:42 for the Ashkenazi, Sephardi, North African, and Eastern Jews, respectively. CF mutations were identified in 374 (4.0%) individuals. These included 173 (46.3%) carriers of the W1282X mutation; 110 (29.4%) found to carry delF508; 23 (6.1%) who carried G542X; 22 (5.9%) who carried 3849 + 10Kb (C-->T; 20 (5.3%) who carried D1152H; 10 (2.7%) who carried N1303K; 11 (2.9%) who carried 405 + IG-->A; 4 (1.1%) who carried W1089X; and one (0.3%) who carried S549R. No carriers were detected for the 1717-1G-->A, G85E, and T360K mutations, which were tested for in 7,383, 1,558, and 41 individuals, respectively.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
33 These were: delF508 (Kerem et al., 1989), W1282X (Vidaud et al., 1990), G542X, 1717-1G R A, S549R (Kerem et al., 1990), N1303K (Osborn et al., 1991), 3849 1 10Kb C R T (Highsmith et al., 1994), T359K/Q360K (Shoshani et al., 1992), G85E (Zielenski et al., 1991), 405 1 1G R A (Dork et al., 1993), W1089X (Shosani et al., 1994), and D1152H (Highsmith et al., 1993). Login to comment
40 THE CONSENSUS POLICY OF SCREENING OF CF MUTATIONS IN ETHNIC GROUPS OF ISRAELI JEWSa Buchara and Iran Georgia Libya Morocco Tunis Turkey Egypt Sephardi W1089X 1 1 1 G85E 1 1 405-1 G® A 1 1 1 S549R 1 1 D1152H 1 1 1 1 T360K 1 Individuals of all ethnic groups were screened for the mutations W1282X, delF508, G5429X, N1303K, 3849110Kb C® T and 1717-1G® A. Login to comment
45 There were 173 (46.3%) carriers of the W1282X mutation; 110 (29.4%) carriers of delF508; 23 (6.1%) carriers of G542X; 10 (2.7%) carriers of N1303K; and 22 (5.9%) carriers of 3849 1 10KbC R T. Twenty (5.3%) were found to carry D1152H; 11 (2.9%) carried 405 1 1G R A; 4 (1.1%) carried W1089X; and 1 (0.3%) carried S549R. No carriers were detected for the mutations 1717-1G R A, G85E, and T360K, which were tested for in 7,383, 1,436, and 41 individuals, respectively. Login to comment
46 D1152H, W1089X, and 405 1 1G R A were tested for in 2,764, 1,658, and 1,551 individuals, respectively. Login to comment
47 The mutations D1152H and W1089X were detected in individuals whose origins had not been included in the consensus panel policy, namely Ashkenazi and Eastern Jews (Table 4B; Figs. 1 and 2). Login to comment
52 Mutations tested for all individuals in the cohort North Total Ashkenazi Sephardi Africa Eastern number of Mutation no. 6850 no. 933 no. 1146 no. 468 carriers W1282X 142 17 8 6 173 delF508 86 12.25 11.5 0.25 110 G542X 20.25 0.5 1.75 0.5 23 N1303K 7.5 1.5 0.25 0.75 10 3849110Kb 17 2 2 1 22 C® T B. Mutations tested for individuals of non-Ashkenazi origin, mixed origin, and of spouses of carriers Type of Total number mutation Number tested Ashkenazi Sephardi North Africa Eastern of carriers D1152H Number tested 1,305 458.25 722.75 280 Carriers 11.5 4.5 3.5 0.5 20 405 Number tested 425.75 372 633.5 119 11G® A Carriers 0.5 1 9.5 0 11 W1089X Number tested 539.25 345 638.5 135 Carriers 2 0.5 1 0.5 4 S549R Number tested 534.5 385.5 686 110 Carriers 0 1 0 0 1 a Ethnic origin was classified according to the country of origin of the four grandparents of each individual. Each grandparent was calculated as contributing a quarter of his/her gene pool and these were summed up for each ethnic origin. Login to comment
61 Ethnic origin of carriers of the W1089X mutation. Login to comment
62 The W1089X mutation was tested in 1,615 individuals; 4 were carriers (0.24%). Login to comment
74 Therefore, Ashkenazi Jews would have been tested for the five main mutationsonly: delF508,W1282X, G542X, N1303K, and 3849 1 10KbC R T. The mutations D1152H and W1089X would not have been included in the test panel in Ashkenazi Jews. Login to comment
77 Surprisingly, our results show that the D1152H and W1089X mutations are present in Ashkenazi Jews, as 8 of the 20 carriers of D1152H were of Ashkenazi origin only, and an additional 6 were half-Ashkenazi (Table 4B; Figs. 1 and 2). Login to comment
78 Similarly, 1 Ashkenazi carrier and 1 half-Ashkenazi carrier were found among 4 carriers of W1089X. Login to comment
91 One might reconsider the cost effectiveness of testing for infrequent mutations such as 1717-1G R A, W1089X, S549R, and G85E when screening the general Jewish population. Login to comment

[hide] Improved detection of cystic fibrosis mutations in... Genet Med. 2001 May-Jun;3(3):168-76. Heim RA, Sugarman EA, Allitto BA
Improved detection of cystic fibrosis mutations in the heterogeneous U.S. population using an expanded, pan-ethnic mutation panel.
Genet Med. 2001 May-Jun;3(3):168-76., [PMID:11388756]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To determine the comparative frequency of 93 CFTR mutations in U.S. individuals with a clinical diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: A total of 5,840 CF chromosomes from Caucasians, Ashkenazi Jews, Hispanics, African Americans, Native Americans, Asians, and individuals of mixed race were analyzed using a pooled ASO hybridization strategy. RESULTS: Sixty-four mutations provided a sensitivity of 70% to 95% in all ethnic groups except Asians, and at least 81% when the U.S. population was considered as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: For population-based carrier screening for CF in the heterogeneous U.S. population, which is characterized by increasing admixture, a pan-ethnic mutation panel of 50 to 70 CFTR mutations may provide a practical test that maximizes sensitivity.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
116 Of the two, W1089X is relatively frequent (1.2%) but was originally reported in one Turkish and one Egyptian Jewish individual17 and had not been described in Hispanics until now. The other, 1078delT,18 was identified on one Hispanic chromosome and no others. Login to comment
119 With the exception of W1089X, 1078delT, and 2869insG, all other mutations identified in Hispanics were also identified in Caucasians. Login to comment

[hide] Improved detection of CFTR mutations in Southern C... Hum Mutat. 2001 Oct;18(4):296-307. Wong LJ, Wang J, Zhang YH, Hsu E, Heim RA, Bowman CM, Woo MS
Improved detection of CFTR mutations in Southern California Hispanic CF patients.
Hum Mutat. 2001 Oct;18(4):296-307., [PMID:11668613]

Abstract [show]
Mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene cause cystic fibrosis (CF), a common autosomal recessive disease in Caucasians. The broad mutation spectrum varies among different patient groups. Current molecular diagnoses are designed to detect 80-97% of CF chromosomes in Caucasians and Ashkenazi Jews but have a much lower detection rate in Hispanic CF patients. Grebe et al. [1994] reported a 58% detection rate in Hispanic patients. Since then, there has been no large-scale, complete mutational analysis of Hispanic CF patients. In this study, the mutations in 62 Hispanic patients from southern California were investigated. The entire coding and flanking intronic regions of the CFTR gene were analyzed by temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE) followed by sequencing to identify the mutations. Eleven novel mutations were discovered in this patient group: 3876delA, 406-1G>A, 935delA, 663delT, 3271delGG, 2105-2117del13insAGAAA, 3199del6, Q179K, 2108delA, 3171delC, and 3500-2A>T. Among the mutations, seven were out-of-frame insertions and deletions that result in truncated proteins, two were splice-site mutations, one was an in-frame 6 bp deletion, and one was a missense mutation that involved the non-conservative change of glutamine-179 to lysine. All patients presented severe classical clinical course with pancreatic insufficiency and poor growth, consistent with the nature of truncation mutation. The results indicate that TTGE screening following the analysis of recurrent mutations will substantially improve the mutation detection rate for Hispanic CF patients from southern California.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
117 Summary of Mutations Found in This Group of Hispanic Patients Exon or Number of Mutation intron chromosomes Frequency % Mutations detected before full gene analysis 91 73.38% 1 F508 10 64 51.6 2 G542X 11 5 4 3 3849+10kb C>T Intron 19 5 4 4 S549N 11 3 2.4 5 I148T 4 2 1.6 6 3120+1G>A 16 2 1.6 7 R334W 7 2 1.6 8 G551D 11 1 0.8 9 N1303K 21 1 0.8 10 W1282X 20 1 0.8 11 R1162X 19 1 0.8 12 G85E 3 1 0.8 13 W1089X 17b 1 0.8 14 Y1092X 17b 1 0.8 15 P205S 6a 1 0.8 Mutations detected by full gene screening 26 20.97% 16 R1066Ca 17b 2 1.6 17 1949del84 13 1 0.8 18 2184delA 13 1 0.8 19 Q98R 4 1 0.8 20 R75X 3 1 0.8 21 G1244E 20 1 0.8 22 3876delA 20 7 5.65 23 935delA 6b 2 1.6 24 406-1G>A Intron 2 2 1.6 25 3271delGG 17a 1 0.8 26 2105-2117del13insAGAAA 13 1 0.8 27 663delT 5 1 0.8 28 3171delC 17a 1 0.8 29 2108delA 13 1 0.8 30 Q179K 5 1 0.8 31 3199del6 17a 1 0.8 32 3500-2 A->T Intron 17b 1 0.8 Total identified 117 (177)b 94.35 (97.5)b Unidentified 7 (3)b 5.65 (2.5)b Total 124 (120)b 100 (100)b a This mutation was also detected by SSCP. Login to comment
122 Clinical Presentations of Hispanic Cystic Fibrosis Patients With Novel Genotypes Patient number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Age/age at 7/1 (31)/0.5 23/1.2 18/9.5 (21)/15 13/0.3 18/at birth 12/7 15/0.5 diagnosisa Genotype ∆F508/3171delC W1089X/Q179K ∆F508/R75X 3271delGG/S549N I148T/3199del6 ∆F508/406-1G->A R334W/3500-2A->T 406-1G->A/unk Y1092X/R1162X Sweat Cl- 87 mEq/L (1) 79 mEq/L (0.5) 86 mEq/L (0.5) 73 mEq/L (10) 102 mEq/L (15) 100 mEq/L (0.5) 104 mEq/L (at birth) 72 mEq/L (4) 64 mEq/L (1) (age) FVC (age)b NA 59% (29) 54% (22) 75% (17) 45% (22) 81% (11); 99 (12) 60% (18) 73% (11); 71 (12) 45% (13) FEV1 (age)c NA 26% (29) 38% (22) 53% (17) 24% (22) 59% (11); 78 (12) 44% (18) 30% (11); 58 (12) 31% (13) Pancreatic Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient functiond Microbial Enterobacter Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Pseudomonas E. coli Staphylococcus Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Pseudomonas colonization Cloacae Aspergillus Pseudomonas Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Pseudomonas Acintobacter Aspergillus Height/weight/ 5/18/4 5/5/30 5/5/22 77/91/17 20/46/20 9/11/12 5/5/18 12/5/12 24/31/13 agee Complications Hypothyroidism RU/RML Learning Diabetes, Hypersplenism, Meconium PPD converter Chronic bronchictasis disability, depression portal ileus constipation requiring chronic hypertension, lobectomy abdominal pain liver cysts a Age and age at diagnosis are in years. Login to comment

[hide] ATB(0)/SLC1A5 gene. Fine localisation and exclusio... Eur J Hum Genet. 2001 Nov;9(11):860-6. Larriba S, Sumoy L, Ramos MD, Gimenez J, Estivill X, Casals T, Nunes V
ATB(0)/SLC1A5 gene. Fine localisation and exclusion of association with the intestinal phenotype of cystic fibrosis.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2001 Nov;9(11):860-6., [PMID:11781704]

Abstract [show]
The Na+-dependent amino acid transporter named ATB(0) was previously found to be located in 19q13.3 by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Genetic heterogeneity in the 19q13.2-13.4 region, syntenic to the Cystic Fibrosis Modulator Locus 1 (CFM1) in mouse, seemed to be associated to the intestinal phenotypic variation of cystic fibrosis (CF). We performed fine chromosomal mapping of ATB(0) on radiation hybrid (RH) panels G3 and TNG. Based on the most accurate location results from TNG-RH panel, mapping analysis evidenced that ATB(0) is localised between STS SHGC-13875 (D19S995) and STS SHGC-6138 in 19q13.3, that corresponds with the immediately telomeric/distal segment of the strongest linkage region within the human CFM1 (hCFM1) syntenic region. Regarding to the genomic structure and exon organisation, our results show that the ATB(0) gene is organised into eight exons. The knowledge of the genomic structure allowed us to perform an exhaustive mutational analysis of the gene. Evaluation of the possible implication of ATB(0) in the intestinal phenotype of CF was performed on the basis of the functional characteristics of the encoded protein, its apparent relevance to meconium ileus (MI) and position in relation to the hCFM1 syntenic region. We have analysed this gene in samples from CF patients with and without MI. Several sequence variations in the ATB(0) gene were identified, although none of them seemed to be related to the intestinal phenotype of CF. Even though no particular allele or haplotype in ATB(0) appears to be associated to CF-MI disease, new SNPs identified should be useful in segregation and linkage disequilibrium analyses in families affected by other disorders caused by the impairment of neutral amino acid transport.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
151 Statistical analysis showed that the higher incidence for P17A and the lower incidence for V512L observed in the general population Table 3 CFTR mutations of the CF patients under study with and without meconium ileus (MI) CF-non MI CF-MI CFTR mutations n CFTR mutations n F508del/R117H 2 F508del/F508del 7 F508del/R334W 3 F508del/L365P 1 F508del/R347P 1 F508del/G542X 1 F508del/621+1G4Ta 1 F508del/621+IG4Ta 1 F508del/M1101K 1 F508del/R1066C 1 F508del/1609delCAa 1 F508del/W1089X 1 F508del/2789+5G4Aa 3 F508del/R1162X 1 F508del/3849+10kbC4T 1 F508del/1609delCAa 1 G542X/G85E 1 F508del/Q1281X 1 G542X/V232D 1 F508del/1811+1.6kbA4G 1 G542X/1811+1.6kb A4Ga 1 F508del/2789+5G4Aa 1 G542X/2789+5G4A 1 F508del/2869insG 1 Q890X/L206W 1 F508del/unknown 1 1811+1.6kbA4G/P205S 1 I507del/I507del 1 R1162X/3272-26A4G 1 G542X/1078delT 1 N1303K/R347H 1 G542X/1811+1.6kbA4Ga 1 N1303K/A1006E+5T 1 S549R/CFTR50kbdel 1 2789+5G4A/405+1G4A 1 R1066C/R1066C 1 W1282X/712-1G4T 1 a CF patient with a sibling presenting identical CFTR genotype and discordance of intestinal phenotype. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR muta... Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM
Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606., [PMID:12007216]

Abstract [show]
Although there have been numerous reports from around the world of mutations in the gene of chromosome 7 known as CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), little attention has been given to integrating these mutant alleles into a global understanding of the population molecular genetics associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). We determined the distribution of CFTR mutations in as many regions throughout the world as possible in an effort designed to: 1) increase our understanding of ancestry-genotype relationships, 2) compare mutational arrays with disease incidence, and 3) gain insight for decisions regarding screening program enhancement through CFTR multi-mutational analyses. Information on all mutations that have been published since the identification and cloning of the CFTR gene's most common allele, DeltaF508 (or F508del), was reviewed and integrated into a centralized database. The data were then sorted and regional CFTR arrays were determined using mutations that appeared in a given region with a frequency of 0.5% or greater. Final analyses were based on 72,431 CF chromosomes, using data compiled from over 100 original papers, and over 80 regions from around the world, including all nations where CF has been studied using analytical molecular genetics. Initial results confirmed wide mutational heterogeneity throughout the world; however, characterization of the most common mutations across most populations was possible. We also examined CF incidence, DeltaF508 frequency, and regional mutational heterogeneity in a subset of populations. Data for these analyses were filtered for reliability and methodological strength before being incorporated into the final analysis. Statistical assessment of these variables revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between DeltaF508 frequency and the CF incidence levels of regional populations. Regional analyses were also performed to search for trends in the distribution of CFTR mutations across migrant and related populations; this led to clarification of ancestry-genotype patterns that can be used to design CFTR multi-mutation panels for CF screening programs. From comprehensive assessment of these data, we offer recommendations that multiple CFTR alleles should eventually be included to increase the sensitivity of newborn screening programs employing two-tier testing with trypsinogen and DNA analysis.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
112 Jewish 1) 405+1G®A (48.0%) 3) W1282X (17.0%) - - 4 23 Kerem et al. [1995] (Tunisia) 2) DF508 (31.0%) 4) 3849+10KbC®T (4.0%) Jewish 1) G85E 4) G542X - - 6 10 Kerem et al. [1995] (Turkey) 2) DF508 5) 3849+10KbC®T 3) W1282X 6) W1089X Jewish (Yemen) None - - 0 5 Kerem et al. [1995] Lebanon 1) DF508 (35.0%) 6) 4096-28G®A (2.5%) - - 9 40 Desgeorges et al. [1997] 2) W1282X (20.0%) 7) 2789+5G®A (2.5%) 3) 4010del4 (10.0%) 8) M952I (2.5%) 4) N1303K (10.0%) 9) E672del (2.5%) 5) S4X (5.0%) Reunion ∆F508 (52.0%) 1717-1G→A (0.7%) 90.4 81.7 9 138 Cartault et al. [1996] Island Y122X (24.0%) G542X (0.7%) 3120+1G→A (8.0%) A309G (0.7%) A455E (2.2%) 2789+5G→A (0.7%) G551D (1.4%) Saudi North: 3) H139L - - North 1 49 families El-Harith et al. [1997]; Arabia 1) 1548delG 4) L1177X Central 3 Kambouris et al. [1997]; Central: 5) DF508 South 4 Banjar et al. [1999] 1)I1234V 6) 3120+1G®A West 9 2)1548delG 7) 425del42 East 6 3)DF508 8) R553X South: 9) N1303K 1) I1234V East: 2) 1548delG 1) 3120+1G®A 3) 711+1G®T 2) H139L 4) 3120+1G®A 3) 1548delG West: 4) DF508 1) I1234V 5) S549R 2) G115X 6) N1303K Tunisia ∆F508 (17.6%) G85E (2.6%) 58.7 34.5 11 78 Messaoud et al. [1996] G542X (8.9%) W1282X (2.6%) 711+1G→T (7.7%) Y122X (1.3%) N1303K (6.4%) T665S (1.3%) 2766del8NT (6.4%) R47W+D1270N (1.3%) R1066C (2.6%) Turkeye ∆F508 (24.5%) 1066L (1.3%) 80.6 65.0 36 1067/670 Yilmaz et al. [1995]; Estivill et al. 1677delTA (4.1%) E822X (1.3%) [1997]; Onay et al. [1998]; 2789+5G→A (3.9%) 2183+5G→A+2184insA (1.3%) Macek et al. [2002] 2181delA (3.8%) D110H (0.8%) R347H (3.6%) P1013L (0.8%) N1303K (2.9%) 3172delAC (0.8%) 621+1G→T (2.6%) 1259insA (0.8%) G542X (2.6%) M1028I (0.8%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS587 E92K (2.6%) 4005+1G→A (0.7%) A96E (2.6%) W1282X (0.7%) M152V (2.6%) I148T (0.6%) 2183AA→G (2.5%) R1162X (0.6%) 296+9A→T (1.6%) D1152H (0.6%) 2043delG (1.4%) W1098X (0.6%) E92X (1.4%) E831X (0.6%) K68N (1.4%) W496X (0.6%) G85E (1.3%) F1052V (0.5%) R1158X (1.3%) L571S (0.5%) United Arab S549R (61.5%) ∆F508 (26.9%) 88.4 78.1 2 86/52 Frossard et al. [1988]; Emirates Frossard et al. [1999] North/Central/South Americas Argentina ∆F508 (58.6%) N1303K (1.8%) 69.1 47.7 5 326/228 CFGAC [1994]; Chertkoff et al. W1282X (3.9%) 1717-1G→A (0.9%) [1997] G542X (3.9%) Brazilf ∆F508 (47.7%) W1282X (1.3%) 66.8 44.6 10 820/500 CFGAC [1994]; Cabello et al. (total) G542X (7.2%) G85E (1.3%) [1999]; Raskin et al. [1999]; R1162X (2.5%) R553X (0.7%) Bernardino et al. [2000] R334W (2.5%) L206W (0.6%) N1303K (2.4%) 2347delG (0.6%) South East: >∆F508, G542X South: >N1303K Brazil ∆F508 (31.7%) N1303K (2.5%) 42.5 18.1 3 120 Parizotto and Bertuzzo [1997] (Sao Paulo) G542X (8.3%) Canada ∆F508 (59.0%) G542X (0.5%) 98.5 97.0 13 381/200 Rozen et al. [1992]; (Lac St. Jean) 621+1G→T (24.3%) N1303K (0.5%) De Braekeleer et al. [1998] A445E (8.2%) Q890X (0.5%) Y1092X (1.2%) S489X (0.5) 711+1G→T (1.0%) R117C (0.5%) I148T (1.0%) R1158 (0.5%) G85E (0.8%) Canada ∆F508 (71.4%) ∆I507 (1.3%) 90.9 82.6 7 77 Rozen et al. [1992] (Quebec City) 711+1G→T (9.1%) Y1092X (1.3%) 621+1G→T (5.2%) N1303K (1.3%) A455E (1.3%) Canada ∆F508 (70.9%) W1282X (0.9%) 82.0 67.2 10 632 Kristidis et al. [1992] (Toronto) G551D (3.1%) R117H (0.9%) G542X (2.2%) 1717-1G→A (0.6%) 621+1G→T (1.3%) R560T (0.6%) N1303K (0.9%) ∆I507 (0.6%) Chile ∆F508 (29.2%) R553X (4.2%) 33.4 11.2 2 72 Rios et al. [1994] Columbia 1) DF508 (35.4%) 3) N1303K (2.1%) - - 4 48 Restrepo et al. [2000] 2) G542X (6.3%) 4) W1282X (2.1%) Ecuador 1) DF508 (25%) - - 1 20 Paz-y-Mino et al. [1999] (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL. Login to comment

[hide] Analysis by mass spectrometry of 100 cystic fibros... Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2066-72. Wang Z, Milunsky J, Yamin M, Maher T, Oates R, Milunsky A
Analysis by mass spectrometry of 100 cystic fibrosis gene mutations in 92 patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens.
Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2066-72., [PMID:12151438]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Limited mutation analysis for congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) has revealed only a minority of men in whom two distinct mutations were detected. We aimed to determine whether a more extensive mutation analysis would be of benefit in genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 92 men with CBAVD using mass spectrometry and primer oligonucleotide base extension to analyse an approximately hierarchical set of the most common 100 CF mutations. RESULTS: Analysis of 100 CF mutations identified 33/92 (35.9%) patients with two mutations and 29/92 (31.5%) with one mutation, compound heterozygosity accounting for 94% (31/33) of those with two mutations. This panel detected 12.0% more CBAVD men with at least one mutation and identified a second mutation in >50% of those considered to be heterozygotes under the two routine 25 mutation panel analyses. CONCLUSION: Compound heterozygosity of severe/mild mutations accounted for the vast majority of the CBAVD patients with two mutations, and underscores the value of a more extensive CF mutation panel for men with CBAVD. The CF100 panel enables higher carrier detection rates especially for men with CBAVD, their partners, partners of known CF carriers, and those with 'mild' CF with rarer mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
20 Given the frequency of CF mutations, especially in the Caucasian population ( in 25), and the common request by CBAVD men to sire their own offspring by using surgical Table I. The 100 most common cystic fibrosis mutations listed by exon Mutationa Exonb Frequency (%)c G85E 3 0.1 394delTT 3 Swedish E60X 3 Belgium R75X 3 405ϩ1G→A Int 3 R117H 4 0.30 Y122X 4 French 457TAT→G 4 Austria I148T 4 Canada (French Canadian) 574delA 4 444delA 4 R117L 4 621ϩ1G→T Int 4 0.72 711ϩ1G→T Int 5 Ͼ0.1 712-1G→T Int 5 711ϩ5G→A Int 5 Italy (Caucasian) L206W 6a R347P 7 0.24 1078delT 7 Ͼ0.1 R334W 7 Ͼ0.1 1154InsTC 7 T338I 7 Italy R347H 7 Turkey Q359K/T360K 7 Israel (Georgian Jews) I336K 7 R352Q 7 G330X 7 S364P 7 A455E 9 0.20 I507 10 0.21 F508 10 66.02 1609delCA 10 Spain (Caucasian) V520F 10 Q493X 10 C524X 10 G480C 10 Q493R 10 1717-1G→A Int 10 0.58 R553X 11 0.73 G551D 11 1.64 G542X 11 2.42 R560T 11 Ͼ0.1 S549N 11 Q552X 11 Italy S549I 11 Israel (Arabs) A559T 11 African American R553G 11 R560K 11 1812-1G→A Int 11 A561E 12 E585X 12 Y563D 12 Y563N 12 1898ϩ1G→A Int 12 0.22 1898ϩ1G→C Int 12 2183AA→G 13 Italian 2184delA 13 Ͻ0.1 K710X 13 2143delT 13 Moscow (Russian) 2184InsA 13 1949del84 13 Spain (Spanish) 2176InsC 13 2043delG 13 2307insA 13 2789ϩ5G→A Int 14b Ͼ0.1 2869insG 15 S945L 15 Q890X 15 3120G→A 16 2067 Table I. continued Mutationa Exonb Frequency (%)c 3120ϩ1G→A Int 16 African American 3272-26A→G Int 17a R1066C 17b Portugal (Portugese) L1077P 17b R1070Q 17b Bulgarian W1089X 17b M1101K 17b Canada (Hutterite) R1070P 17b R1162X 19 0.29 3659delC 19 Ͼ0.1 3849G→A 19 3662delA 19 3791delC 19 3821delT 19 Russian Q1238X 19 S1235R 19 France, South S1196X 19 K1177R 19 3849ϩ10kbC→T Int 19 0.24 3849ϩ4A→G Int 19 W1282X 20 1.22 S1251N 20 Dutch, Belgian 3905insT 20 Swiss, Acadian, Amish G1244E 20 R1283M 20 Welsh W1282R 20 D1270N 20 S1255X 20 African American 4005ϩ1G→A Int 20 N1303K 21 1.34 W1316X 21 aMutations were chosen according to their frequencies (Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium, 1994; Zielenski and Tsui, 1995; Estivill et al., 1997). Login to comment

[hide] Standards and guidelines for CFTR mutation testing... Genet Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;4(5):379-91. Richards CS, Bradley LA, Amos J, Allitto B, Grody WW, Maddalena A, McGinnis MJ, Prior TW, Popovich BW, Watson MS, Palomaki GE
Standards and guidelines for CFTR mutation testing.
Genet Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;4(5):379-91., [PMID:12394352]

Abstract [show]
One mission of the ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance (QA) Committee is to develop standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, including cytogenetics, biochemical, and molecular genetics specialties. This document was developed under the auspices of the Molecular Subcommittee of the Laboratory QA Committee by the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Working Group. It was placed on the "fast track" to address the preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical quality assurance practices of laboratories currently providing testing for CF. Due to the anticipated impact of the ACMG recommendation statement endorsing carrier testing of reproductive couples, it was viewed that CF testing would increase in volume and that the number of laboratories offering CF testing would also likely increase. Therefore, this document was drafted with the premise of providing useful information gained by experienced laboratory directors who have provided such testing for many years. In many instances, "tips" are given. However, these guidelines are not to be interpreted as restrictive or the only approach but to provide a helpful guide. Certainly, appropriately trained and credentialed laboratory directors have flexibility to utilize various testing platforms and design testing strategies with considerable latitude. We felt that it was essential to include technique-specific guidelines of several current technologies commonly used in laboratories providing CF testing, since three of the four technologies discussed are available commercially and are widely utilized. We take the view that these technologies will change, and thus this document will change with future review.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
51 A recent report by Orgad et al.11 indicated that additional mutations were found in Jewish Israeli populations, including D1152H, 405 ϩ 1GϾA, W1089X, and S549R. Login to comment
57 Mutations not included in the 25 mutation core testing panel that have been reported in these populations include D1270N, W1089X, and S549N.13-15 CF 2.8.4 Insufficient information is available for the Asian American population. Login to comment

[hide] High allelic heterogeneity between Afro-Brazilians... Genet Test. 2003 Fall;7(3):213-8. Raskin S, Pereira L, Reis F, Rosario NA, Ludwig N, Valentim L, Phillips JA 3rd, Allito B, Heim RA, Sugarman EA, Probst CM, Faucz F, Culpi L
High allelic heterogeneity between Afro-Brazilians and Euro-Brazilians impacts cystic fibrosis genetic testing.
Genet Test. 2003 Fall;7(3):213-8., [PMID:14641997]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by at least 1,000 different mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR). To determine the frequency of 70 common worldwide CFTR mutations in 155 Euro-Brazilian CF patients and in 38 Afro-Brazilian CF patients, we used direct PCR amplification of DNA from a total of 386 chromosomes from CF patients born in three different states of Brazil. The results show that screening for seventy mutations accounts for 81% of the CF alleles in Euro-Brazilians, but only 21% in the Afro-Brazilian group. We found 21 different mutations in Euro-Brazilians and only 7 mutations in Afro-Brazilians. The frequency of mutations and the number of different mutations detected in Euro-Brazilians are different from Northern European and North American populations, but similar to Southern European populations; in Afro-Brazilians, the mix of CF-mutations is different from those reported in Afro-American CF patients. We also found significant differences in detection rates between Euro-Brazilian (75%) and Afro-Brazilian CF patients (21%) living in the same state, Minas Gerais. These results, therefore, have implications for the use of DNA-based tests for risk assessment in heterogeneous populations like the Brazilians. Further studies are needed to identify the remaining CF mutations in the different populations and regions of Brazil.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
63 FREQUENCIES OF 70 CFTR MUTATIONS IN DIFFERENT STATES OF BRAZIL, BY CONTINENTA L GROUP CFTR mutations SC PR MG detected n n n n % n % N % DF508 53 39 54 146 47.1 8 10.5 154 39.9 G542X 6 9 8 23 7.4 1 1.3 24 6.2 R1162X 9 2 4 15 4.8 2 2.6 17 4.4 N1303K 5 5 0 10 3.2 0 0 10 2.6 R334W 5 1 4 10 3.2 0 0 10 2.6 G85E 2 2 4 8 2.6 1 1.3 9 2.3 1717-1G®A 1 3 2 6 1.9 0 0 6 1.6 W1282X 4 1 1 6 1.9 0 0 6 1.6 3849110kbC®T 1 3 1 5 1.6 0 0 5 1.3 R553X 0 2 0 2 0.7 0 0 2 0.5 1812-1G®A 0 1 3 4 1.3 1 1.3 5 1.3 2183AA®G 2 1 0 3 1.0 0 0 3 0.8 312011G®A 0 0 2 2 0.7 2 2.6 4 1.0 Y1092X 0 1 1 2 0.7 1 1.3 3 0.8 G551D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W1089X 0 0 1 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 6211G®T 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 Q1238X 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 711-1G®T 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 R347P 1 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 189811G®A 1 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 I507 0 0 1 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 Subtotal 91 73 86 250 80.7 16 21.1 266 68.9 Alleles with CFTR 5 27 28 60 19.4 60 79.0 120 31.1 mutations not detected Total 96 100 114 310 100.0 76 100.0 386 100.0 Detection rate (%) 94.8 73.0 75.4 250 80.7 16 21.1 266 68.9 The following 70 CFTR mutations were selected and tested on the basis of frequency in various populations, known association with CF, or predicted deleterious effect on the CFTR protein product; DF508, G542X, N1303K, G551D, R553X, DI507, A455E, A559T, C524X, D1270N, E60X, G178R, G330X, G85E, 2307insA, I148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P 2307insA, I148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P 2307insA, 1148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P, R352Q, R560T, S1196X, S1255X, S364P, S549N, S549R, V520F, W1089X, W1282X, W1310X, W1316X, Y1092X, Y122X, Y563D, 1078delT,1677delTA,1717-1G-A,1812-1G-A,1898 1 1G-A, 2043delG,2183delAA-G, 2184delA, 2789 1 5G-A, 2869insG, 2909delT, 3120 1 1G-A, 3120G-A, 3358delAC, 3659delC, 3662delA, 3750delAG, 3791delC, 3821delT, 3849 1 10KbC-T, 3849 1 4A-G, 3905insT, 405 1 1G-A, 444delA, 556delA, 574delA, 621 1 1G-T, and 711 1 1G-T. aSC, Santa Catarina State; PR, Parana State; MG, Minas Gerais State; n, number of chromosomes. Login to comment

[hide] CFTR mutation distribution among U.S. Hispanic and... Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):392-9. Sugarman EA, Rohlfs EM, Silverman LM, Allitto BA
CFTR mutation distribution among U.S. Hispanic and African American individuals: evaluation in cystic fibrosis patient and carrier screening populations.
Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):392-9., [PMID:15371903]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We reviewed CFTR mutation distribution among Hispanic and African American individuals referred for CF carrier screening and compared mutation frequencies to those derived from CF patient samples. METHODS: Results from CFTR mutation analyses received from January 2001 through September 2003, were analyzed for four populations: Hispanic individuals with a CF diagnosis (n = 159) or carrier screening indication (n = 15,333) and African American individuals with a CF diagnosis (n = 108) or carrier screening indication (n = 8,973). All samples were tested for the same 87 mutation panel. RESULTS: In the Hispanic population, 42 mutations were identified: 30 in the patient population (77.5% detection rate) and 33 among carrier screening referrals. Five mutations not included in the ACMG/ACOG carrier screening panel (3876delA, W1089X, R1066C, S549N, 1949del84) accounted for 7.55% detection in patients and 5.58% among carriers. Among African American referrals, 33 different mutations were identified: 21 in the patient population (74.4% detection) and 23 in the carrier screening population. Together, A559T and 711+5G>A were observed at a detection rate of 3.71% in CF patients and 6.38% in carriers. The mutation distribution seen in both the carrier screening populations reflected an increased frequency of mutations with variable expression such as D1152H, R117H, and L206W. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed analysis of CFTR mutation distribution in the Hispanic and African American patient and carrier screening populations demonstrates that a diverse group of mutations is most appropriate for diagnostic and carrier screening in these populations. To best serve the increasingly diverse U.S. population, ethnic-specific mutations should be included in mutation panels.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
4 Five mutations not included in the ACMG/ACOG carrier screening panel (3876delA, W1089X, R1066C, S549N, 1949del84) accounted for 7.55% detection in patients and 5.58% among carriers. Login to comment
35 87 mutation panel The following mutations were included in the panel: ⌬F508, ⌬F311, ⌬I507, A455E, A559T, C524X, D1152H, D1270N, E60X, G178R, G330X, G480C, G542X, G551D, G85E, G91R, I148T, K710X, L206W, M1101K, N1303K, P574H, Q1238X, Q359K/T360K, Q493X, Q552X, Q890X, R1066C, R1158X, R1162X, R117C, R117H, R1283M, R334W, R347H, R347P, R352Q, R553X, R560T, S1196X, S1251N, S1255X, S364P, S549I, S549N, S549R, T338I, V520F, W1089X, W1282X, Y1092X, Y563D, 1078delT, 1161delC, 1609delCA, 1677delTA, 1717-1GϾA, 1812-1GϾA, 1898ϩ1GϾA, 1898ϩ5GϾT, 1949del84, 2043delG, 2143delT, 2183delAAϾG, 2184delA, 2307insA, 2789ϩ5GϾA, 2869insG, 3120ϩ1GϾA, 3120GϾA, 3659delC, 3662delA, 3791delC, 3821delT, 3849ϩ10kbCϾT, 3849ϩ4AϾG, 3905insT, 394delTT, 405ϩ1GϾA, 405ϩ3AϾC, 444delA, 574delA, 621ϩ1GϾT, 711ϩ1GϾT, 711ϩ5GϾA, 712-1GϾT, 3876delA CFTR mutation analysis Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes, buccal cell swabs, or bloodspots by Qiagen QIAmp 96 DNA Blood Kit. Specimens were tested for 87 mutations by a pooled allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridization method as previously described.16,17 Two multiplex chain reactions (PCR) were used to amplify 19 regions of the CFTR gene. Login to comment
56 Among 318 CF patient chromosomes, 30 mutations were identified with ⌬F508, G542X, R334W, 3120ϩ1GϾA, W1089X, 3876delA, and R1066C representing 52.52% of the total. Login to comment
69 With the exception of W1089X, the next 6 most frequent mutations in the patient population (G542X, R334W, 3120ϩ1GϾA, 3876delA, W1089X, and R1066C) were all seen in the carrier population at frequencies of 1.4% to 4.2%. Login to comment
70 The W1089X mutation, which accounted for 2.2% detection among CF patients, was not seen in the carrier population. Login to comment
108 In the current study, 42 different mutations were identified among the Hispanic individuals (patients and carriers) tested and the most common mutations included those previously reported to be common among Hispanics, 3876delA,32 W1089X,17 as well as mutations considered frequent in African Americans (3120ϩ1GϾA)19 and panethnic (e.g., G542X, ⌬I507) populations.33 Although regional variation in overall detection rates may occur, these data provide general guidance when developing a panethnic mutation panel and information useful for genetic counseling purposes. Login to comment
115 The lack of detection in the carrier screening population of mutations identified among patients (e.g., 2307delA, W1089X) is not unexpected given the inherent variability in estimates of low-frequency mutations. Login to comment
120 Although not yet identified among our carrier screening population, the W1089X mutation with a 2.2% frequency among CF patients would also be valuable. Login to comment

[hide] Mutation spectrum in Jewish cystic fibrosis patien... Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Jul 30;136(3):246-8. Quint A, Lerer I, Sagi M, Abeliovich D
Mutation spectrum in Jewish cystic fibrosis patients in Israel: implication to carrier screening.
Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Jul 30;136(3):246-8., 2005-07-30 [PMID:15948195]

Abstract [show]
We have tested 144 unrelated Jewish patients suffering from the classical form of cystic fibrosis. The patients were screened for a panel of 12 mutations including the six Ashkenazi founder mutations (DeltaF508, W1282X, N1303K, G542X, 3849 + 10 kb C-->T, 1717-1G > A) and six mutations that were found in non-Ashkenazi Jewish patients (S549R (T-->G), G85E, 405 + 1G-->A, W1089X, Y1092, and D1152H). Patients of Georgian origin were tested also for the Q359K/T360K mutation. In addition, all the patients were tested for the IVS-8 variant (9T/7T/5T). Of all the cystic fibrosis (CF)-bearing chromosomes, 94% (264/281) were accounted for by one of the known mutations, and none of the patients had the 5T allele of the IVS-8 variant. Single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of the coding sequence of the CFTR gene followed by sequencing showed eight mutations on ten CF chromosomes, leaving seven chromosomes (2.5%) with unknown mutations. We identified three mutations in two or more CF chromosomes, 2571 + 1insT in Jews from Iraq, 3121-1G > A in patients from Kurdistan and I1234V in Yemenite Jewish patients. The other five mutations appeared on a single allele and are considered "private mutations." In this study we have identified 99% of CF alleles in Ashkenazi Jewish patients, 91% in Jews of North African origin and 75% in Jewish patients from Iraq. The significance of these findings to the population screening in Israel is discussed.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
25 MUTATION ANALYSIS The following mutations are routinely tested in Jewish patients: the Ashkenazi founder mutations, DF508, W1282X, N1303K, G542X, 3849 þ 10 kb C!T, 1717-1G > A [Abeliovich et al., 1992], mutations commonly found in non-Ashkenazi patients, S549R (T!G), G85E, 405 þ 1G!A, W1089X, Y1092X, D1152H. Login to comment
44 Patients from the Balkan countries, Greece and Turkey (21 alleles), had some of the Ashkenazi founder mutations (W1282X, DF508, G542X, and 3849 þ 10 kb C!T), in addition to two other mutations, G85E and W1089X that were not found in Jewish patients from other origins. Login to comment
58 Mutations in the CF Bearing Alleles in the Jewish Patients According to the Ethnic Origin Country of origin Ashkenazi Morocco Tunisia Balkan Iraq Iran/ Kurdistan Georgia Yemen Total Number of alleles (%) 193 (69.0) 34 (12.1) 12 (4.3) 21 (7.5) 8 (2.8) 3 (0.7) 8 (2.8) 2 (0.7) 281 W1282X (%) 83 (42.8) 1 (8.3) 4 (19.0) 88 (31.3) DF508 (%) 65 (33.5) 24 (70.6) 3 (25.0) 7 (33.3) 1 100 (35.6) N1303K (%) 10 (5.2) 10 (3.6) G542X (%) 19 (10.3) 4 (19.0) 24 (8.5) 3849-10 kbC!T (%) 10 (5.1) 1 (2.9) 2 (9.5) 13 (4.6) 1717-1G!A (%) 2 (1.0) 2 (0.7) D1152H (%) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4) S549R (T!G) (%) 4 (11.8) 4 (1.4) G85E (%) 2 (9.5) 2 (0.7) 405 þ 1G!A (%) 8 (66.7) 8 (2.8) Y1092X (%) 3 (37.5) 3 (1.1) W1089X (%) 2 (9.5) 2 (0.7) Q359K/T360K (%) 8 (100) 8 (2.8) I1234V (%) 2 (100) 2 (0.7) 2751 þ 1insT (%) 2 (25.0) 2 (0.7) 3121-1G > A (%) 1 1 (0.4) M952I (%) 1 (12.5) 1 (0.4) L165S (%) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4) A455E (%) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4) L997F (%) 1 (2.9) 1 (0.4) G1244E (%) 1 (2.9) 1 (0.4) Unkown (%) 1 (0.5) 3 (8.8) 2 (25.0) 1 7 (2.5) Mutation Spectrum in Jewish CF Patients [Wahab, 2003]. Login to comment
69 We suggest that 15 mutations that were found on two or more CF chromosomes from unrelated patients (DF508, W1282X, N1303K, G542X, 3849 þ 10 kb C!T, 1717-1 G!A, S549R (T!G), G85E, 405 þ 1G!A, W1089X, Y1092X, 2751 þ 1insT, 3121-1G!A, Q359K/T360K, I1234V) be tested in the CF screening of all Jewish individuals regardless of their origin. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in an ethnically d... Clin Chem. 2011 Jun;57(6):841-8. Epub 2011 Apr 7. Rohlfs EM, Zhou Z, Heim RA, Nagan N, Rosenblum LS, Flynn K, Scholl T, Akmaev VR, Sirko-Osadsa DA, Allitto BA, Sugarman EA
Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in an ethnically diverse US population.
Clin Chem. 2011 Jun;57(6):841-8. Epub 2011 Apr 7., [PMID:21474639]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cystic fibrosis (CF) and the frequency of specific disease-causing mutations vary among populations. Affected individuals experience a range of serious clinical consequences, notably lung and pancreatic disease, which are only partially dependent on genotype. METHODS: An allele-specific primer-extension reaction, liquid-phase hybridization to a bead array, and subsequent fluorescence detection were used in testing for carriers of 98 CFTR [cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (ATP-binding cassette sub-family C, member 7)] mutations among 364 890 referred individuals with no family history of CF. RESULTS: One in 38 individuals carried one of the 98 CFTR mutations included in this panel. Of the 87 different mutations detected, 18 were limited to a single ethnic group. African American, Hispanic, and Asian individuals accounted for 33% of the individuals tested. The mutation frequency distribution of Caucasians was significantly different from that of each of these ethnic groups (P < 1 x 10(1)). CONCLUSIONS: Carrier testing using a broad mutation panel detects differences in the distribution of mutations among ethnic groups in the US.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
127 Eighteen different mutations were identified in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals; 5 non-ACMG mutations (p.D1152H, c.54-5940_273ϩ10250del21kb, p.S549R, p.W1089X, p. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and genetic risk factors for cystic fibro... Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1):52-7. Wilschanski M, Rivlin J, Cohen S, Augarten A, Blau H, Aviram M, Bentur L, Springer C, Vila Y, Branski D, Kerem B, Kerem E
Clinical and genetic risk factors for cystic fibrosis-related liver disease.
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1):52-7., [PMID:9917439]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define the role of possible risk factors for the development of cystic fibrosis (CF)-related liver disease and to analyze the association between liver disease and the different genotypes present in the Israeli CF patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients followed at the seven CF centers in Israel were included in this study. Liver disease was determined by persistently elevated serum liver enzymes and/or bilirubin, and/or significant ultrasonographic changes suggestive of chronic liver disease. The following clinical parameters were evaluated: ethnic origin, age at assessment of liver function, sex, history of meconium ileus, pancreatic function, history of distal intestinal obstruction syndrome, pulmonary function, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mutation analysis. RESULTS: Of the 288 patients screened, 80 (28%) had liver disease. Of the 256 patients with pancreatic insufficiency, 80 (31%) had liver disease compared with none of the 32 patients with pancreatic sufficiency. Genotype-phenotype correlation was performed on 207 patients carrying identified mutations that were previously classified according to phenotype severity. Liver disease was found in 56 (32%) of 173 patients carrying mutations associated with a severe phenotype and in 6 (38%) of 16 patients carrying at least one mutation associated with a variable genotype (G85E and/or 5T allele). None of the 18 patients carrying the 3849+10kb C->T mutation had liver disease. Prevalence of liver disease increased with age. No correlation was found between liver disease and severity of lung disease, nutritional status, history of meconium ileus, or distal intestinal obstruction syndrome. CONCLUSION: CF patients who have pancreatic insufficiency and carry mutations associated with a severe or a variable genotype are at increased risk to develop liver disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
117 Classification of Identified Genotype According to Severity of Disease Severe n Milder n Variable n Unclassified n ⌬F508/⌬F508 52 3849 ϩ 10kbC 3 T/⌬F508 7 ⌬F508/G85E 1 S549R/S549R 1 W1282X/W1282X 30 3849 ϩ 10kbC 3 T/405 ϩ 1G3A 3 G85E/G85E 5 S549R/G542X 2 ⌬F508/W1282X 39 3849 ϩ 10 kbC 3 T/W1282X 7 G85E/5T 1 S549R/W1282X 1 ⌬F508/G542X 10 3849 ϩ 10kbC 3 T/G85E 1 ⌬F508/5T 1 ⌬F508/W1089X 1 W1282X/G542X 12 W1282X/5T 2 Y1092X/Y1092X 1 W1282X/N1303K 7 W1282X/5T 1 Q359K-T360K/? Login to comment
118 2 W1282X/405 ϩ 1G3A 1 5T/W1089X 2 ⌬F508/? Login to comment

[hide] Detection of CFTR mutations using temporal tempera... Electrophoresis. 2004 Aug;25(15):2593-601. Wong LJ, Alper OM
Detection of CFTR mutations using temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis.
Electrophoresis. 2004 Aug;25(15):2593-601., [PMID:15300780]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF), caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, is one of the most common autosomal recessive diseases with variable incidences and mutation spectra among different ethnic groups. Current commercially available mutation panels designed for the analysis of known recurrent mutations have a detection rate between 38 to 95%, depending upon the ethnic background of the patient. We describe the application of a novel mutation detection method, temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE), to the study of the molecular genetics of Hispanic CF patients. TTGE effectively identified numerous rare and novel mutations and polymorphisms. One interesting observation is that the majority of the novel mutations are splice site, frame shift, or nonsense mutations that cause severe clinical phenotypes. Our data demonstrate that screening of the 27 exons and intron/exon junctions of the CFTR gene by TTGE greatly improves the molecular diagnosis of Hispanic CF patients.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
96 Detection of known mutations and polymorphisms by TTGE Base substitution Mutation Exon or intron Homozygote or heterozygote Polymorphism or mutation # Alleles detected 1 c.386G.A p.G85E 3 Heterozygote Mutation 2 2 c.575T.C p.I148T 4 Heterozygote Mutation 2 3 c.406-1G.A Splice Int 4 Heterozygote Mutation 9 4 c.71111G.T Splice Int 5 Heterozygote Mutation 1 5 c.1059_1069del 3bp p.F311del 7 Heterozygote Mutation 2 6 c.1132C.T p.R334W 7 Heterozygote Mutation 2 7 c.1652_1655del 3bp p.F508del 10 Heterozygote Mutation 94 8 Homozygote Mutation 12 c.1540A/G p.M470V 10 Heterozygote Polymorphism 15 9 Homozygote Polymorphism 4 c.1756G.T p.G542X 11 Heterozygote Mutation 13 10 c.1784G.A p.G551D 11 Heterozygote Mutation 1 11 c.1778G.A p.S549N 11 Heterozygote Mutation 4 12 c.1789C.T p.R553X 11 Homozygote Mutation 2 13 c.1807G.A p.A559T 11 Heterozygote Mutation 2 14 c.189811G.A Splice Int 12 Heterozygote Mutation 1 15 c.1949del84bp Frameshift 13 Heterozygote Mutation 3 16 c.278915G.A Splice Int 14b Heterozygote Mutation 2 17 c.312011G.A Splice Int 16 Heterozygote Mutation 9 18 c.3171delC Frameshift 17a Heterozygote Mutation 1 19 c.3398G.A p.W1089X 17b Heterozygote Mutation 1 20 c.3425G.A p.W1098X 17b Heterozygote Mutation 1 21 c.3616C.T p.R1162X 19 Heterozygote Mutation 2 22 c.3791delC Frameshift 19 Heterozygote Mutation 1 23 c.3821delT Frameshift 19 Heterozygote Mutation 1 24 c.3876delA Frameshift 20 Heterozygote Mutation 4 25 c.3905insT Frameshift 20 Heterozygote Mutation 1 26 c.4041C.G p.N1303K 21 Heterozygote Mutation 2 Total 194 The translation starts at c.133 of CFTR CDNA sequence in GenBank Acc. Login to comment

[hide] Spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in cystic f... Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Mar;71(Pt 2):194-201. Alonso MJ, Heine-Suner D, Calvo M, Rosell J, Gimenez J, Ramos MD, Telleria JJ, Palacio A, Estivill X, Casals T
Spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in cystic fibrosis patients of Spanish ancestry.
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Mar;71(Pt 2):194-201., [PMID:17331079]

Abstract [show]
We analyzed 1,954 Spanish cystic fibrosis (CF) alleles in order to define the molecular spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in Spanish CF patients. Commercial panels showed a limited detection power, leading to the identification of only 76% of alleles. Two scanning techniques, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and single strand conformation polymorphism/hetroduplex (SSCP/HD), were carried out to detect CFTR sequence changes. In addition, intragenic markers IVS8CA, IVS8-6(T)n and IVS17bTA were also analyzed. Twelve mutations showed frequencies above 1%, p.F508del being the most frequent mutation (51%). We found that eighteen mutations need to be studied to achieve a detection level of 80%. Fifty-one mutations (42%) were observed once. In total, 121 disease-causing mutations were identified, accounting for 96% (1,877 out of 1,954) of CF alleles. Specific geographic distributions for the most common mutations, p.F508del, p.G542X, c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G and c.1609delCA, were confirmed. Furthermore, two other relatively common mutations (p.V232D and c.2789 + 5G > A) showed uneven geographic distributions. This updated information on the spectrum of CF mutations in Spain will be useful for improving genetic testing, as well as to facilitate counselling in people of Spanish ancestry. In addition, this study contributes to defining the molecular spectrum of CF in Europe, and corroborates the high molecular mutation heterogeneity of Mediterranean populations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
52 Mutation 0.46-0.35 9 c.1078delT #, p.R347P # 8 p.G85V, c.621 + 1G > T #, p.S549R (T > G) #, p.R553X #, c.3849 + 10kbC > T # 7 p.R347H #, c.1812-1G > A, p.R709X 0.30-0.10 6 p.H199Y, p.P205S, 5 p.R117H #, p.G551D #, p.W1089X, p.Y1092X, CFTR50kbdel 4 c.296 + 3insT, c.1717-1G > A #, c.1949del84, c.3849 + 1G > A 3 p.E92K, c.936delTA, c.1717-8G > A, c.1341G > A, p.A561E, c.2603delT, p.G1244E, [p.D1270N; p.R74W] 2 p.Q2X, p.P5L, CFTRdele2,3, p.S50P, p.E60K, c.405 + 1G > A, c.1677delTA, p.L558S, p.G673X, p.R851X, p.Y1014C, p.Q1100P, p.M1101K, p.D1152H, CFTRdele19, p.G1244V, p.Q1281X, p.Y1381X <0,1 1 c.124del23bp, p.Q30X, p.W57X, c.406-1G > A, p.Q98R, p.E115del, c.519delT, p.L159S, c.711 + 3A > T, p.W202X, c.875 + 1G > A, p.E278del, p.W361R, c.1215delG, p.L365P, p.A399D, c.1548delG, p.K536X, p.R560G, c.1782delA, p.L571S, [p.G576A; p.R668C], p.T582R, p.E585X, c.1898 + 1G > A, c.1898 + 3A > G, c.2051delTT, p.E692X, p.R851L, c.2711delT, c.2751 + 3A > G, c.2752-26A > G, p.D924N, p.S945L, c.3121-1G > A, p.V1008D, p.L1065R, [p.R1070W; p.R668C], [p.F1074L; 5T], p.H1085R, p.R1158X, c.3659delC #, c.3667del4, c.3737delA, c.3860ins31, c.3905insT #, c.4005 + 1G > A, p.T1299I, p.E1308X, p.Q1313X, c.4095 + 2T > A, rearrangements study (n = 4) Mutations identified in CF families with mixed European origin: c.182delT, p.L1254X, c.4010del4. Login to comment

[hide] Retrospective analysis of stored dried blood spots... J Cyst Fibros. 2012 Jul;11(4):332-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 1. Barben J, Gallati S, Fingerhut R, Schoeni MH, Baumgartner MR, Torresani T
Retrospective analysis of stored dried blood spots from children with cystic fibrosis and matched controls to assess the performance of a proposed newborn screening protocol in Switzerland.
J Cyst Fibros. 2012 Jul;11(4):332-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 1., [PMID:22300503]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Newborn screening (NBS) for Cystic Fibrosis (CF) has been introduced in many countries, but there is no ideal protocol suitable for all countries. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate whether the planned two step CF NBS with immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and 7 CFTR mutations would have detected all clinically diagnosed children with CF in Switzerland. METHODS: IRT was measured using AutoDELFIA Neonatal IRT-Kit in stored NBS cards. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2009, 66 children with CF were reported, 4 of which were excluded for various reasons (born in another country, NBS at 6 months, no informed consent). 98% (61/62) had significantly higher IRT compared to matched control group. There was one false negative IRT result in an asymptomatic child with atypical CF (normal pancreatic function and sweat test). CONCLUSIONS: All children but one with atypical CF would have been detected with the planned two step protocol.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
80 CFTR mutations Alleles found Percentage of total Homozygous (n) F508del a 86 68.2 30 3905insT a 4 3.2 1 G542X a 3 2.4 - R553X a 3 2.4 1 W1282X a 2 1.6 - 1717-1 GNA a 2 1.6 - N1303K a 0 0.0 - S549R 3 2.4 1 Q525X 3 2.4 - Y1092X 2 1.6 - 3120+1 GNA b 2 1.6 1 2347delG 2 1.6 - 2176insC 1 0.8 - 3659delC 1 0.8 - 3359delCTCTG 1 0.8 - W1089X 1 0.8 - 711+1 GNT 1 0.8 - D1152H 1 0.8 - G1244E 1 0.8 - R1066C 1 0.8 - R31C 1 0.8 - R347P 1 0.8 - R74W 1 0.8 - S945L 1 0.8 - T501I 1 0.8 - K68X 1 0.8 - Total 126 100.0% 34 a Seven most common CF-gene mutations in Switzerland ("Swiss panel")=79.4% (100/126) of alleles. Login to comment

[hide] The D1152H cystic fibrosis mutation in prenatal ca... J Med Screen. 2011;18(4):169-72. Epub 2011 Dec 7. Peleg L, Karpati M, Bronstein S, Berkenstadt M, Frydman M, Yonath H, Pras E
The D1152H cystic fibrosis mutation in prenatal carrier screening, patients and prenatal diagnosis.
J Med Screen. 2011;18(4):169-72. Epub 2011 Dec 7., [PMID:22156145]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of the D1152H mutation in the CFTR gene in normal individuals, in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and in the setting of prenatal diagnosis. SETTING: A database analysis of sequential screening results seen at the Sheba Medical Center, Israel, between 2001 and 2010. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the frequency of D1152H in a large cohort of healthy individuals who were screened as part of a routine prenatal care programme, in individuals referred due to CF-related symptoms and in the setting of prenatal diagnosis. RESULTS: We found one asymptomatic homozygous female and 195 D1152H carriers among 49,940 healthy individuals screened, establishing a carrier rate of 1:255 for this mutation. We detected D1152H in nine of 103 individuals referred due to CF-related symptoms. Four suffered from respiratory symptoms and five from congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD). During this period D1152H was detected in three pregnancies, two of which were aborted. CONCLUSION: The increased frequency of D1152H in individuals referred due to CF-related symptoms compared with healthy individuals included in the CF carrier screening programme (P < 0.001) clearly indicates that it is a disease-causing mutation.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
180 of mutations Group of mutations 2001 Ashkenazi Jews 7 Group A Non-Ashkenazi Jews 11 Group A þ B Georgian Jews 12 Group A þ B þ T360K/Q359K 9.2004-7.2005 Yemenite Jews 12 Groups A þ B þ I1234V Iraqi Jews 12 Groups A þ B þY1092X 8.2005-12.2007 Iraqi Jews 14 Groups A þ B þY1092X þ 3121-1G-A 1.2008-2010 14 mutations for all 14 Groups A þ B þ C Georgian Jews 15 Groups A þ B þ C þ T360K/Q359K Arabic population 19 Groups A þ B þ C þ D Group A: G542X, W1282X, N1303K, F508del, 3849 þ 10KbC-T, 1717-1G-A, D1152H Group B: W1089X, G85E, 405 þ 1G-A, S549R(T-G) Group C: Y1092X, 3121-1G-A, I1234V Group D: 4010delTATT, S549I, 3120 þ 1Kbdel18.6Kb, 2183AA-G, R75X Between 2005-2008 the Iraqi population was screened for an additional mutation 2751 þ 1insT. Login to comment

[hide] Mutational spectrum of cystic fibrosis patients fr... Mol Genet Metab. 2006 Apr;87(4):370-5. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Ramirez AM, Ramos MD, Jimenez J, Ghio A, de Botelli MM, Rezzonico CA, Marques I, Pereyro S, Casals T, de Kremer RD
Mutational spectrum of cystic fibrosis patients from Cordoba province and its zone of influence: implications of molecular diagnosis in Argentina.
Mol Genet Metab. 2006 Apr;87(4):370-5. Epub 2006 Jan 19., [PMID:16423550]

Abstract [show]
Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disorder affecting 1/2000-4000 newborns in Caucasian populations. This lethal disease mainly affects respiratory and digestive organs as well as fertility in man. So far, the CF prevalence and mutational spectrum have showed specificity among populations and regions, making it necessary to establish them in each one. In this study, we present the spectrum and frequency of CFTR gene mutations in CF patients from Cordoba (a province with 3.1 millions inhabitants in the middle of Argentina) and its zone of influence, to offer an accurate genetic testing. The study includes 78 families in which 98 patients fulfilled clinical criteria to CF diagnosis. The strategy for the molecular diagnosis comprised analysis of 21 common mutations, microsatellite haplotypes and the complete CFTR gene analysis using scanning techniques followed by sequencing of the abnormal migration patterns. Our first step led us to the identification of 10 mutations that represented 76% of alleles. Another four mutations (p.R1066C, c.1811 + 1.6 kbA > G, c.711 + 1G > T, and p.G85E) were found based on the microsatellite haplotype-mutation association. Finally, 14 mutations were characterized after the CFTR gene scanning, three of them are not previously described (p.G27R, c.622-2A > G, and p.W277R). In summary, we have identified 27 mutations accounting for 94.23% of CF alleles. This characteristic mutational spectrum highlights the 14 most frequent mutations (>1%) in the Cordoba region.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
85 Haplotype (n D 20) No. of chromosomes (n D 64)a Mutations associated (No. of chromosomes) 23-31 14 p.F508del 17-31 7 p.F508del 17-7 7 p.R1066C (3), p.W277R, c.2789 + 5G > A, c.3120 + 1G > A, c.3849 + 10KbC > T 16-7 6 c.3272-26A > G (2), p.G27R, c.622-2A > G, unknown (2) 16-32 5 p.S589I (2), unknown (3) 16-30 3 IVS8-5T (2), unknown 23-33 2 p.G542X, p.R1283M 23-32 2 p.G542X 23-30 2 p.F508del, p.N1303K 24-31 2 p.N1303K 16-24 2 p.G85E 16-31 3 c.1898 + 1G > A, p.W1089X, unknown 16-46 2 c.1811 + 1.6KbA > G 16-25 1 c.711 + 1G > T 16-33 1 Unknown 16-44 1 c.1898 + 1G > A 16-45 1 p.Y913C 16-47 1 c.4005 + 1G > A 17-30 1 Unknown 23-7 1 [c.3199_3204delATAGTG; p.I148T] Table 2 Frequency of the mutations in the 78 CF Argentinean patients of Córdoba region a IdentiWed novel mutations. Login to comment
86 Mutation Exon/Intron CF alleles % p.F508del Exon 10 94 60.26 p.N1303K Exon 21 8 5.13 p.G542X Exon 11 7 4.49 p.R334W Exon 7 3 1.93 p.R1066C Exon 17b 3 1.93 c.2789 + 5G > A Intron 14b 3 1.93 p.G85E Exon 3 2 1.28 c.3659del C Exon 19 2 1.28 c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G Intron 11 2 1.28 c.1898 + 1G > A Intron 12 2 1.28 c.3272-26A > G Intron 17a 2 1.28 p.S589I Exon 12 2 1.28 p.R553X Exon 11 2 1.28 IVS8-5T Intron 8 2 1.28 c.3849 + 10kb C > T Intron 19 1 0.64 c.621 + 1G > T Intron 4 1 0.64 p.R1162X Exon 19 1 0.64 c.711 + 1G > T Intron 5 1 0.64 c.3120 + 1G > A Intron 16 1 0.64 p.Y913C Exon 15 1 0.64 c.4005 + 1G > A Intron 20 1 0.64 p.W1089X Exon 17b 1 0.64 p.R1283M Exon 20 1 0.64 [p.I148T;c.3199_3204del ATAGTG] Exon 4, Exon 17a 1 0.64 p.G27Ra Exon 2 1 0.64 p.W277Ra Exon 6b 1 0.64 c.622-2A > Ga Intron4 1 0.64 Unknown allele - 9 5.77 Wrst year of life he required several internments, for hydroelectric desequilibrium and persistent pulmonary infections causing failure to thrive. Login to comment
123 In addition, it is important to denote that in our series the most frequent mutations found were p.F508del, p.N1303K, p.G542X, p.R334W, p.R1066C, and c.2789+5G>A, however, the last two ones were rare in Buenos Aires series (p.R1066C, 0.23%) and others were not found (p.S589I, c.3272-26A>G, c.1898+1G>A, c.711+1G>T, c.3199_ 3204delATAGTG, p.W1089X, p.R1283M, p.Y913C, c.4005+1G>A, c.3120 +1G >A, p.G27R, p.W277R, and c.622-2A>G). Login to comment
121 In addition, it is important to denote that in our series the most frequent mutations found were p.F508del, p.N1303K, p.G542X, p.R334W, p.R1066C, and c.2789+5G>A, however, the last two ones were rare in Buenos Aires series (p.R1066C, 0.23%) and others were not found (p.S589I, c.3272-26A>G, c.1898+1G>A, c.711+1G>T, c.3199_ 3204delATAGTG, p.W1089X, p.R1283M, p.Y913C, c.4005+1G>A, c.3120 +1G >A, p.G27R, p.W277R, and c.622-2A>G). Login to comment

[hide] Genotyping microarray for the detection of more th... J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):375-87. Schrijver I, Oitmaa E, Metspalu A, Gardner P
Genotyping microarray for the detection of more than 200 CFTR mutations in ethnically diverse populations.
J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):375-87., [PMID:16049310]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF), which is due to mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene, is a common life-shortening disease. Although CF occurs with the highest incidence in Caucasians, it also occurs in other ethnicities with variable frequency. Recent national guidelines suggest that all couples contemplating pregnancy should be informed of molecular screening for CF carrier status for purposes of genetic counseling. Commercially available CF carrier screening panels offer a limited panel of mutations, however, making them insufficiently sensitive for certain groups within an ethnically diverse population. This discrepancy is even more pronounced when such carrier screening panels are used for diagnostic purposes. By means of arrayed primer extension technology, we have designed a genotyping microarray with 204 probe sites for CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutation detection. The arrayed primer extension array, based on a platform technology for disease detection with multiple applications, is a robust, cost-effective, and easily modifiable assay suitable for CF carrier screening and disease detection.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
53 Table 1. Continued CFTR location Amino acid change Nucleotide change 141 IVS 16 Splicing defect 3120 ϩ 1GϾA 142 IVS 16 Splicing defect 3121 - 2AϾG 143 IVS 16 Splicing defect 3121 - 2AϾT 144 E 17a Frameshift 3132delTG 145 E 17a I1005R 3146TϾG 146 E 17a Frameshift 3171delC 147 E 17a Frameshift 3171insC 148 E 17a del V1022 and I1023 3199del6 149 E 17a Splicing defect 3271delGG 150 IVS 17a Possible splicing defect 3272 - 26AϾG 151 E 17b G1061R 3313GϾC 152 E 17b R1066C 3328CϾT 153 E 17b R1066S 3328CϾA 154 E 17b R1066H 3329GϾA 155 E 17b R1066L 3329GϾT 156 E 17b G1069R 3337GϾA 157 E 17b R1070Q 3341GϾA 158 E 17b R1070P 3341GϾC 159 E 17b L1077P 3362TϾC 160 E 17b W1089X 3398GϾA 161 E 17b Y1092X (TAA) 3408CϾA 162 E 17b Y1092X (TAG) 3408CϾG 163 E 17b L1093P 3410TϾC 164 E 17b W1098R 3424TϾC 165 E 17b Q1100P 3431AϾC 166 E 17b M1101K 3434TϾA 167 E 17b M1101R 3434TϾG 168 IVS 17b 3500 - 2AϾT 3500 - 2AϾT 169 IVS 17b Splicing defect 3500 - 2AϾG 170 E 18 D1152H 3586GϾC 171 E 19 R1158X 3604CϾT 172 E 19 R1162X 3616CϾT 173 E 19 Frameshift 3659delC 174 E 19 S1196X 3719CϾG 175 E 19 S1196T 3719TϾC 176 E 19 Frameshift and K1200E 3732delA and 3730AϾG 177 E 19 Frameshift 3791delC 178 E 19 Frameshift 3821delT 179 E 19 S1235R 3837TϾG 180 E 19 Q1238X 3844CϾT 181 IVS 19 Possible splicing defect 3849 ϩ 4AϾG 182 IVS 19 Splicing defect 3849 ϩ 10 kb CϾT 183 IVS 19 Splicing defect 3850 - 1GϾA 184 E 20 G1244E 3863GϾA 185 E 20 G1244V 3863GϾT 186 E 20 Frameshift 3876delA 187 E 20 G1249E 3878GϾA 188 E 20 S1251N 3884GϾA 189 E 20 T1252P 3886AϾC 190 E 20 S1255X 3896CϾA and 3739AϾG in E19 191 E 20 S1255L 3896CϾT 192 E 20 Frameshift 3905insT 193 E 20 D1270N 3940GϾA 194 E 20 W1282R 3976TϾC 195 E 20 W1282X 3978GϾA 196 E 20 W1282C 3978GϾT 197 E 20 R1283M 3980GϾT 198 E 20 R1283K 3980GϾA 199 IVS 20 Splicing defect 4005 ϩ 1GϾA 200 E 21 Frameshift 4010del4 201 E 21 Frameshift 4016insT 202 E 22 Inframe del E21 del E21 203 E 21 N1303K 4041CϾG 204 E 24 Frameshift 4382delA Genomic and Synthetic Template Samples Where possible, native genomic DNA was collected. Login to comment
150 Primers Generated to Create Synthetic Templates That Serve As Positive Mutation Controls Primer name Sense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Name Antisense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј 175delC synt F T(15)ATTTTTTTCAGGTGAGAAGGTGGCCA 175delC synt R T(15)ATTTGGAGACAACGCTGGCCTTTTCC W19C synt F T(15)TACCAGACCAATTTTGAGGAAAGGAT W19C synt R T(15)ACAGCTAAAATAAAGAGAGGAGGAAC Q39X synt F T(15)TAAATCCCTTCTGTTGATTCTGCTGA Q39X synt R T(15)AGTATATGTCTGACAATTCCAGGCGC 296 ϩ 12TϾC synt F T(15)CACATTGTTTAGTTGAAGAGAGAAAT 296 ϩ 12TϾC synt R T(15)GCATGAACATACCTTTCCAATTTTTC 359insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATGTTCTAT 359insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAACATCGCCGAAGGGCATTAA E60X synt F T(15)TAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAAAATCCTAA E60X synt R T(15)ATCTATCCCATTCTCTGCAAAAGAAT P67L synt F T(15)TTAAACTCATTAATGCCCTTCGGCGA P67L synt R T(15)AGATTTTTCTTTGAAGCCAGCTCTCT R74Q synt F T(15)AGCGATGTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATG R74Q synt R T(15)TGAAGGGCATTAATGAGTTTAGGATT R75X synt F T(15)TGATGTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATGTT R75X synt R T(15)ACCGAAGGGCATTAATGAGTTTAGGA W57X(TAG) synt F T(15)AGGATAGAGAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAA W57X(TAG) synt R T(15)TATTCTCTGCAAAAGAATAAAAAGTG W57X(TGA) synt F T(15)AGATAGAGAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAAA W57X(TGA) synt R T(15)TCATTCTCTGCAAAAGAATAAAAAGT G91R synt F T(15)AGGGTAAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTC G91R synt R T(15)TTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCATAGAAC 405 ϩ 1GϾA synt F T(15)ATAAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTCATT 405 ϩ 1GϾA synt R T(15)TCCCTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCATAG 405 ϩ 3AϾC synt F T(15)CAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTCATTAT 405 ϩ 3AϾC synt R T(15)GACCCCTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCAT 406 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AGAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTC 406 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAAT E92X synt F T(15)TAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTCT E92X synt R T(15)ACTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAA E92K synt F T(15)AAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTCT E92K synt R T(15)TCTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAA 444delA synt F T(15)GATCATAGCTTCCTATGACCCGGATA 444delA synt R T(15)ATCTTCCCAGTAAGAGAGGCTGTACT 574delA synt F T(15)CTTGGAATGCAGATGAGAATAGCTAT 574delA synt R T(15)AGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGGCTGGG 621GϾA synt F T(15)AGTAATACTTCCTTGCACAGGCCCCA 621GϾA synt R T(15)TTTCTTATAAATCAAACTAAACATAG Q98P synt F T(15)CGCCTCTCTTACTGGGAAGAATCATA Q98P synt R T(15)GGTACTGCTTTGGTGACTTCCTACAA 457TATϾG synt F T(15)GGACCCGGATAACAAGGAGGAACGCT 457TATϾG synt R T(15)CGGAAGCTATGATTCTTCCCAGTAAG I148T synt F T(15)CTGGAATGCAGATGAGAATAGCTATG I148T synt R T(15)GTGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGGCTGG 624delT synt F T(15)CTTAAAGCTGTCAAGCCGTGTTCTAG 624delT synt R T(15)TAAGTCTAAAAGAAAAATGGAAAGTT 663delT synt F T(15)ATGGACAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCC 663delT synt R T(15)CATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACACGGC G178R synt F T(15)AGACAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCCAA G178R synt R T(15)TAATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACACGG Q179K synt F T(15)AAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCCAACAA Q179K synt R T(15)TTCCAATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACA 711 ϩ 5GϾA synt F T(15)ATACCTATTGATTTAATCTTTTAGGC 711 ϩ 5GϾA synt R T(15)TTATACTTCATCAAATTTGTTCAGGT 712 - 1GϾT synt F T(15)TGGACTTGCATTGGCACATTTCGTGT 712 - 1GϾT synt R T(15)TATGGAAAATAAAAGCACAGCAAAAAC H199Y synt F T(15)TATTTCGTGTGGATCGCTCCTTTGCA H199Y synt R T(15)TATGCCAATGCTAGTCCCTGGAAAATA P205S synt F T(15)TCTTTGCAAGTGGCACTCCTCATGGG P205S synt R T(15)TAAGCGATCCACACGAAATGTGCCAAT L206W synt F T(15)GGCAAGTGGCACTCCTCATGGGGCTA L206W synt R T(15)TCAAGGAGCGATCCACACGAAATGTGC Q220X synt F T(15)TAGGCGTCTGCTTTCTGTGGACTTGG Q220X synt R T(15)TATAACAACTCCCAGATTAGCCCCATG 936delTA synt F T(15)AATCCAATCTGTTAAGGCATACTGCT 936delTA synt R T(15)TGATTTTCAATCATTTCTGAGGTAATC 935delA synt F T(15)GAAATATCCAATCTGTTAAGGCATAC 935delA synt R T(15)TATTTCAATCATTTCTGAGGTAATCAC N287Y synt F T(15)TACTTAAGACAGTAAGTTGTTCCAAT N287Y synt R T(15)TATTCAATCATTTTTTCCATTGCTTCT 1002 - 3TϾG synt F T(15)GAGAACAGAACTGAAACTGACTCGGA 1002 - 3TϾG synt R T(15)TCTAAAAAACAATAACAATAAAATTCA 1154insTC syntwt F T(15)ATCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTGCGCAT 1154insTC syntwt R T(15)TTGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTTTCCGGA 1154insTC syntmt F T(15)TCTCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTGCGCAT 1154insTC syntmt R T(15)TAGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTTTCCGGA DF311 mt syntV1 F T(15)CCTTCTTCTCAGGGTTCTTTGTGGTG dF311 mt syntV1 R T(15)GAGAAGAAGGCTGAGCTATTGAAGTATC G330X synt F T(15)TGAATCATCCTCCGGAAAATATTCAC G330X synt R T(15)ATTTGATTAGTGCATAGGGAAGCACA S364P synt F T(15)CCTCTTGGAGCAATAAACAAAATACA S364P synt R T(15)GGTCATACCATGTTTGTACAGCCCAG Q359K/T360K mt synt F T(15)AAAAAATGGTATGACTCTCTTGGAGC Q359K/T360K mt synt R T(15)TTTTTTACAGCCCAGGGAAATTGCCG 1078delT synt F T(15)CTTGTGGTGTTTTTATCTGTGCTTCC 1078delT synt R T(15)CAAGAACCCTGAGAAGAAGAAGGCTG 1119delA synt F T(15)CAAGGAATCATCCTCCGGAAAATATT 1119delA synt R T(15)CTTGATTAGTGCATAGGGAAGCACAG 1161delC synt F T(15)GATTGTTCTGCGCATGGCGGTCACTC 1161delC synt R T(15)TCAGAATGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTT T338I synt F T(15)TCACCATCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTG T338I synt R T(15)ATGAATATTTTCCGGAGGATGATTCC R352Q synt F T(15)AGCAATTTCCCTGGGCTGTACAAACA R352Q synt R T(15)TGAGTGACCGCCATGCGCAGAACAAT L346P synt F T(15)CGCGCATGGCGGTCACTCGGCAATTT L346P synt R T(15)GGAACAATGCAGAATGAGATGGTGGT 1259insA synt F T(15)AAAAAGCAAGAATATAAGACATTGGA 1259insA synt R T(15)TTTTTGTAAGAAATCCTATTTATAAA W401X(TAG)mtsynt F T(15)AGGAGGAGGTCAGAATTTTTAAAAAA W401X(TAG)mtsynt R T(15)TAGAAGGCTGTTACATTCTCCATCAC W401X(TGA) synt F T(15)AGAGGAGGTCAGAATTTTTAAAAAAT W401X(TGA) synt R T(15)TCAGAAGGCTGTTACATTCTCCATCA 1342 - 2AϾC synt F T(15)CGGGATTTGGGGAATTATTTGAGAAA 1342 - 2AϾC synt R T(15)GGTTAAAAAAACACACACACACACAC 1504delG synt F T(15)TGATCCACTGTAGCAGGCAAGGTAGT 1504delG synt R T(15)TCAGCAACCGCCAACAACTGTCCTCT G480C synt F T(15)TGTAAAATTAAGCACAGTGGAAGAAT G480C synt R T(15)ACTCTGAAGGCTCCAGTTCTCCCATA C524X synt F T(15)ACAACTAGAAGAGGTAAGAAACTATG C524X synt R T(15)TCATGCTTTGATGACGCTTCTGTATC V520F synt F T(15)TTCATCAAAGCAAGCCAACTAGAAGA V520F synt R T(15)AGCTTCTGTATCTATATTCATCATAG 1609delCA synt F T(15)TGTTTTCCTGGATTATGCCTGGCACC 1609delCA synt R T(15)CAGAACAGAATGAAATTCTTCCACTG 1717 - 8GϾA synt F T(15)AGTAATAGGACATCTCCAAGTTTGCA 1717 - 8GϾA synt R T(15)TAAAAATAGAAAATTAGAGAGTCACT 1784delG synt F T(15)AGTCAACGAGCAAGAATTTCTTTAGC 1784delG synt R T(15)ACTCCACTCAGTGTGATTCCACCTTC A559T synt F T(15)ACAAGGTGAATAACTAATTATTGGTC A559T synt R T(15)TTAAAGAAATTCTTGCTCGTTGACCT Q552X synt F T(15)TAACGAGCAAGAATTTCTTTAGCAAG Q552X synt R T(15)AACCTCCACTCAGTGTGATTCCACCT S549R(AϾC) synt F T(15)CGTGGAGGTCAACGAGCAAGAATTTC S549R(AϾC) synt R T(15)GCAGTGTGATTCTACCTTCTCCAAGA S549R(TϾG) synt F T(15)GGGAGGTCAACGAGCAAGTATTTC S549R(TϾG) synt R T(15)CCTCAGTGTGATTCCACCTTCTCCAA L558S synt F T(15)CAGCAAGGTGAATAACTAATTATTGG L558S synt R T(15)GAAGAAATTCTCGCTCGTTGACCTCC 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG synt F T(15)GTAAGTAAGGTTACTATCAATCACAC 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG synt R T(15)CATCTCAAGTACATAGGATTCTCTGT 1812 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AAGCAGTATACAAAGATGCTGATTTG 1812 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTAAAAAGAAAATGGAAATTAAATTA D572N synt F T(15)AACTCTCCTTTTGGATACCTAGATGT D572N synt R T(15)TTAATAAATACAAATCAGCATCTTTG P574H synt F T(15)ATTTTGGATACCTAGATGTTTTAACA P574H synt R T(15)TGAGAGTCTAATAAATACAAATCAGC 1833delT synt F T(15)ATTGTATTTATTAGACTCTCCTTTTG 1833delT synt R T(15)CAATCAGCATCTTTGTATACTGCTCT Table 4. Continued Primer name Sense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Name Antisense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Y563D synt F T(15)GACAAAGATGCTGATTTGTATTTATT Y563D synt R T(15)CTACTGCTCTAAAAAGAAAATGGAAA T582R synt F T(15)GAGAAAAAGAAATATTTGAAAGGTAT T582R synt R T(15)CTTAAAACATCTAGGTATCCAAAAGG E585X synt F T(15)TAAATATTTGAAAGGTATGTTCTTTG E585X synt R T(15)ATTTTTCTGTTAAAACATCTAGGTAT 1898 ϩ 5GϾT synt F T(15)TTTCTTTGAATACCTTACTTATATTG 1898 ϩ 5GϾT synt R T(15)AATACCTTTCAAATATTTCTTTTTCT 1924del7 synt F T(15)CAGGATTTTGGTCACTTCTAAAATGG 1924del7 synt R T(15)CTGTTAGCCATCAGTTTACAGACACA 2055del9ϾA synt F T(15)ACATGGGATGTGATTCTTTCGACCAA 2055del9ϾA synt R T(15)TCTAAAGTCTGGCTGTAGATTTTGGA D648V synt F T(15)TTTCTTTCGACCAATTTAGTGCAGAA D648V synt R T(15)ACACATCCCATGAGTTTTGAGCTAAA K710X synt F T(15)TAATTTTCCATTGTGCAAAAGACTCC K710X synt R T(15)ATCGTATAGAGTTGATTGGATTGAGA I618T synt F T(15)CTTTGCATGAAGGTAGCAGCTATTTT I618T synt R T(15)GTTAATATTTTGTCAGCTTTCTTTAA R764X synt F T(15)TGAAGGAGGCAGTCTGTCCTGAACCT R764X synt R T(15)ATGCCTGAAGCGTGGGGCCAGTGCTG Q685X synt F T(15)TAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGGAGAGTT Q685X synt R T(15)ATTTTTTTGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACA R709X synt F T(15)TGAAAATTTTCCATTGTGCAAAAGAC R709X synt R T(15)ATATAGAGTTGATTGGATTGAGAATA V754M synt F T(15)ATGATCAGCACTGGCCCCACGCTTCA V754M synt R T(15)TGCTGATGCGAGGCAGTATCGCCTCT 1949del84 synt F T(15)AAAAATCTACAGCCAGACTTTATCTC 1949del84 synt R T(15)TTTTTAGAAGTGACCAAAATCCTAGT 2108delA synt F T(15)GAATTCAATCCTAACTGAGACCTTAC 2108delA synt R T(15)ATTCTTCTTTCTGCACTAAATTGGTC 2176insC synt F T(15)CCAAAAAAACAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGGAGAG 2176insC synt R T(15)GGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACAGGAGCAT 2184delA synt F T(15)CAAAAAACAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGG 2184delA synt R T(15)GTTTTTTGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACAG 2105-2117 del13 synt F T(15)AAACTGAGACCTTACACCGTTTCTCA 2105-2117 del13 synt R T(15)TTTCTTTCTGCACTAAATTGGTCGAA 2307insA synt F T(15)AAAGAGGATTCTGATGAGCCTTTAGA 2307insA synt R T(15)TTTCGATGCCATTCATTTGTAAGGGA W846X synt F T(15)AAACACATACCTTCGATATATTACTGTCCAC W846X synt R T(15)TCATGTAGTCACTGCTGGTATGCTCT 2734G/AT synt F T(15)TTAATTTTTCTGGCAGAGGTAAGAAT 2734G/AT synt R T(15)TTAAGCACCAAATTAGCACAAAAATT 2766del8 synt F T(15)GGTGGCTCCTTGGAAAGTGAGTATTC 2766del8 synt R T(15)CACCAAAGAAGCAGCCACCTGGAATGG 2790 - 2AϾG synt F T(15)GGCACTCCTCTTCAAGACAAAGGGAA 2790 - 2AϾG synt R T(15)CGTAAAGCAAATAGGAAATCGTTAAT 2991del32 synt F T(15)TTCAACACGTCGAAAGCAGGTACTTT 2991del32 synt R T(15)AAACATTTTGTGGTGTAAAATTTTCG Q890X synt F T(15)TAAGACAAAGGGAATAGTACTCATAG Q890X synt R T(15)AAAGAGGAGTGCTGTAAAGCAAATAG 2869insG synt F T(15)GATTATGTGTTTTACATTTACGTGGG 2869insG synt R T(15)CACGAACTGGTGCTGGTGATAATCAC 3120GϾA synt F T(15)AGTATGTAAAAATAAGTACCGTTAAG 3120GϾA synt R T(15)TTGGATGAAGTCAAATATGGTAAGAG 3121 - 2AϾT synt F T(15)TGTTGTTATTAATTGTGATTGGAGCT 3121 - 2AϾT synt R T(15)AGTAAGATCAAAGAAAACATGTTGGT 3132delTG synt F T(15)TTGATTGGAGCCATAGCAGTTGTCGC 3132delTG synt R T(15)AATTAATAACAACTGTAAGATCAAAG 3271delGG synt F T(15)ATATGACAGTGAATGTGCGATACTCA 3271delGG synt R T(15)ATTCAGATTCCAGTTGTTTGAGTTGC 3171delC synt F T(15)ACCTACATCTTTGTTGCAACAGTGCC 3171delC synt R T(15)AGGTTGTAAAACTGCGACAACTGCTA 3171insC synt F T(15)CCCCTACATCTTTGTTGCTACAGTGC 3171insC synt R T(15)GGGGTTGTAAAACTGCGACAACTGCT 3199del6 synt F T(15)GAGTGGCTTTTATTATGTTGAGAGCATAT 3199del6 synt R T(15)CCACTGGCACTGTTGCAACAAAGATG M1101K synt F T(15)AGAGAATAGAAATGATTTTTGTCATC M1101K synt R T(15)TTTTGGAACCAGCGCAGTGTTGACAG G1061R synt F T(15)CGACTATGGACACTTCGTGCCTTCGG G1061R synt R T(15)GTTTTAAGCTTGTAACAAGATGAGTG R1066L synt F T(15)TTGCCTTCGGACGGCAGCCTTACTTT R1066L synt R T(15)AGAAGTGTCCATAGTCCTTTTAAGCT R1070P synt F T(15)CGCAGCCTTACTTTGAAACTCTGTTC R1070P synt R T(15)GGTCCGAAGGCACGAAGTGTCCATAG L1077P synt F T(15)CGTTCCACAAAGCTCTGAATTTACAT L1077P synt R T(15)GGAGTTTCAAAGTAAGGCTGCCGTCC W1089X synt F T(15)AGTTCTTGTACCTGTCAACACTGCGC W1089X synt R T(15)TAGTTGGCAGTATGTAAATTCAGAGC L1093P synt F T(15)CGTCAACACTGCGCTGGTTCCAAATG L1093P synt R T(15)GGGTACAAGAACCAGTTGGCAGTATG W1098R synt F T(15)CGGTTCCAAATGAGAATAGAAATGAT W1098R synt R T(15)GGCGCAGTGTTGACAGGTACAAGAAC Q1100P synt F T(15)CAATGAGAATAGAAATGATTTTTGTC Q1100P synt R T(15)GGGAACCAGCGCAGTGTTGACAGGTA D1152H synt F T(15)CATGTGGATAGCTTGGTAAGTCTTAT D1152H synt R T(15)GTATGCTGGAGTTTACAGCCCACTGC R1158X synt F T(15)TGATCTGTGAGCCGAGTCTTTAAGTT R1158X synt R T(15)ACATCTGAAATAAAAATAACAACATT S1196X synt F T(15)GACACGTGAAGAAAGATGACATCTGG S1196X synt R T(15)CAATTCTCAATAATCATAACTTTCGA 3732delA synt F T(15)GGAGATGACATCTGGCCCTCAGGGGG 3732delA synt R T(15)CTCCTTCACGTGTGAATTCTCAATAA 3791delC synt F T(15)AAGAAGGTGGAAATGCCATATTAGAG 3791delC synt R T(15)TTGTATTTTGCTGTGAGATCTTTGAC 3821delT synt F T(15)ATTCCTTCTCAATAAGTCCTGGCCAG 3821delT synt R T(15)GAATGTTCTCTAATATGGCATTTCCA Q1238X synt F T(15)TAGAGGGTGAGATTTGAACACTGCTT Q1238X synt R T(15)AGCCAGGACTTATTGAGAAGGAAATG S1255X (ex19)synt F T(15)GTCTGGCCCTCAGGGGGCCAAATGAC S1255X (ex19) synt R T(15)CGTCATCTTTCTTCACGTGTGAATTC S1255X;L synt F T(15)AAGCTTTTTTGAGACTACTGAACACT S1255X;L synt R T(15)TATAACAAAGTAATCTTCCCTGATCC 3849 ϩ 4AϾG synt F T(15)GGATTTGAACACTGCTTGCTTTGTTA 3849 ϩ 4AϾG synt R T(15)CCACCCTCTGGCCAGGACTTATTGAG 3850 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AGTGGGCCTCTTGGGAAGAACTGGAT 3850 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTATAAGGTAAAAGTGATGGGATCAC 3905insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTGAGACTACTGAACACTGAA 3905insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAAGCTGATAACAAAGTACTCT 3876delA synt F T(15)CGGGAAGAGTACTTTGTTATCAGCTT 3876delA synt R T(15)CGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAAGAGGCCCA G1244V synt F T(15)TAAGAACTGGATCAGGGAAGAGTACT G1244V synt R T(15)ACCAAGAGGCCCACCTATAAGGTAAA G1249E synt F T(15)AGAAGAGTACTTTGTTATCAGCTTTT G1249E synt R T(15)TCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAAGAGGCC S1251N synt F T(15)ATACTTTGTTATCAGCTTTTTTGAGACTACTG S1251N synt R T(15)TTCTTCCCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAA S1252P synt F T(15)CCTTTGTTATCAGCTTTTTTGAGACT S1252P synt R T(15)GACTCTTCCCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCC D1270N synt F T(15)AATGGTGTGTCTTGGGATTCAATAAC D1270N synt R T(15)TGATCTGGATTTCTCCTTCAGTGTTC W1282R synt F T(15)CGGAGGAAAGCCTTTGGAGTGATACC W1282R synt R T(15)GCTGTTGCAAAGTTATTGAATCCCAA R1283K synt F T(15)AGAAAGCCTTTGGAGTGATACCACAG R1283K synt R T(15)TTCCACTGTTGCAAAGTTATTGAATC 4005 ϩ 1GϾA synt F T(15)ATGAGCAAAAGGACTTAGCCAGAAAA 4005 ϩ 1GϾA synt R T(15)TCTGTGGTATCACTCCAAAGGCTTTC 4010del4 synt F T(15)GTATTTTTTCTGGAACATTTAGAAAAAACTTGG 4010del4 synt R T(15)AAAATACTTTCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAA 4016insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTCTGGAACATTTAGAAAAAACTTGG 4016insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAATAAATACTTTCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGA CFTRdele21 synt F T(15)TAGGTAAGGCTGCTAACTGAAATGAT CFTRdele21 synt R T(15)CCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAAGAAAGTATG 4382delA synt F T(15)GAGAGAACAAAGTGCGGCAGTACGAT 4382delA synt R T(15)CTCTATGACCTATGGAAATGGCTGTT Bold, mutation allele of interest; bold and italicized, modified nucleotide. Login to comment

[hide] Diagnostic testing by CFTR gene mutation analysis ... J Mol Diagn. 2005 May;7(2):289-99. Schrijver I, Ramalingam S, Sankaran R, Swanson S, Dunlop CL, Keiles S, Moss RB, Oehlert J, Gardner P, Wassman ER, Kammesheidt A
Diagnostic testing by CFTR gene mutation analysis in a large group of Hispanics: novel mutations and assessment of a population-specific mutation spectrum.
J Mol Diagn. 2005 May;7(2):289-99., [PMID:15858154]

Abstract [show]
Characterization of CFTR mutations in the U.S. Hispanic population is vital to early diagnosis, genetic counseling, patient-specific treatment, and the understanding of cystic fibrosis (CF) pathogenesis. The mutation spectrum in Hispanics, however, remains poorly defined. A group of 257 self-identified Hispanics with clinical manifestations consistent with CF were studied by temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis and/or DNA sequencing. A total of 183 mutations were identified, including 14 different amino acid-changing novel variants. A significant proportion (78/85) of the different mutations identified would not have been detected by the ACMG/ACOG-recommended 25-mutation screening panel. Over one third of the mutations (27/85) occurred with a relative frequency >1%, which illustrates that the identified mutations are not all rare. This is supported by a comparison with other large CFTR studies. These results underscore the disparity in mutation identification between Caucasians and Hispanics and show utility for comprehensive diagnostic CFTR mutation analysis in this population.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
103 Table 1. Continued Mutations in 257 patients Allele counts of each mutation % of variant alleles (183) % of all alleles tested (514) R1070W 1 0.55 0.19 R1158X 1 0.55 0.19 R1438W 1 0.55 0.19 R334W 2 1.09 0.39 R352W 1 0.55 0.19 R553X 2 1.09 0.39 R668C 2 1.09 0.39 R74W 3 1.64 0.58 R75X 3 1.64 0.58 S1235R 2 1.09 0.39 S492F 2 1.09 0.39 S549N 1 0.55 0.19 S573CS573C 1 0.55 0.19 S945L 1 0.55 0.19 T351S 1 0.55 0.19 T501A 2 1.09 0.39 T604ST604S 1 0.55 0.19 V11I 1 0.55 0.19 V201 mol/L 1 0.55 0.19 V232D 2 1.09 0.39 V754 mol/L 1 0.55 0.19 W1089X 2 1.09 0.39 W1098C 1 0.55 0.19 W1204X 4 2.19 0.78 Y563N 1 0.55 0.19 Y913XY913X 1 0.55 0.19 85 different mutations 183 100.00 35.60 Novel variants are in boldface, mutations on the ACMG/ACOG panel are italicized. Login to comment
187 CFTR Sequence Variants Identified in Five Comprehensive CFTR Studies in US Hispanics CFTR mutations Alleles Relative mutation frequency (%) (of 317) deltaF508 123 38.80 3876delA 15 4.70 G542X 12 3.80 406 - 1GϾA 8 2.50 3849 ϩ 10kbCϾT 5 1.60 R75X 4 1.30 935delA 4 1.30 S549N 4 1.30 W1204X 4 1.30 R334W 4 1.30 2055del9ϾA 3 1 R74W 3 1 H199Y 3 1 L206W 3 1 663delT 3 1 3120 ϩ 1GϾA 3 1 L997F 3 1 I1027T 3 1 R1066C 3 1 W1089X 3 1 D1270N 3 1 2105del13insAGAAA 3 1 Q98R 2 Ͻ1 E116K 2 Ͻ1 I148T 2 Ͻ1 R668C 2 Ͻ1 P205S 2 Ͻ1 V232D 2 Ͻ1 S492F 2 Ͻ1 T501A 2 Ͻ1 1949del84 2 Ͻ1 Q890X 2 Ͻ1 3271delGG 2 Ͻ1 3272 - 26AϾG 2 Ͻ1 G1244E 2 Ͻ1 D1445N 2 Ͻ1 R553X 2 Ͻ1 E588V 2 Ͻ1 1717 - 8GϾA 2 Ͻ1 A1009T 2 Ͻ1 S1235R 2 Ͻ1 G85E 1 Ͻ1 296 ϩ 28AϾG 1 Ͻ1 406 - 6TϾC 1 Ͻ1 V11I 1 Ͻ1 Q179K 1 Ͻ1 V201 mol/L 1 Ͻ1 874insTACA 1 Ͻ1 I285F 1 Ͻ1 deltaF311 1 Ͻ1 F311L 1 Ͻ1 L320V 1 Ͻ1 T351S 1 Ͻ1 R352W 1 Ͻ1 1248 ϩ 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1249 - 29delAT 1 Ͻ1 1288insTA 1 Ͻ1 1341 ϩ 80GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1429del7 1 Ͻ1 1525 - 42GϾA 1 Ͻ1 P439S 1 Ͻ1 1717 - 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1811 ϩ 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 deltaI507 1 Ͻ1 G551D 1 Ͻ1 A559T 1 Ͻ1 Y563N 1 Ͻ1 (Table continues) In this study, we used temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE) and direct DNA sequencing to increase the sensitivity of mutation detection in U.S. Hispanics, and to determine whether additional mutations are recurrent. Login to comment
201 Comparison of Relative Frequencies of CFTR Sequence Variants in Comprehensive CFTR Studies in US and Mexican Hispanics This study % Orozco 2000 % US/ Mexican % deltaF508 28.96 54.48 43.72 G542X 3.83 8.28 5.19 406 - 1GϾA 3.28 2.07 2.38 W1204X 2.19 Ͻ1 1.08 R74W 1.64 Ͻ1 R75X 1.64 2.07 1.51 H199Y 1.64 Ͻ1 Ͻ1 L206W 1.64 Ͻ1 L997F 1.64 Ͻ1 I1027T 1.64 Ͻ1 2055del9ϾA 1.64 1.38 1.27 D1270N 1.64 Ͻ1 E116K 1.09 Ͻ1 V232D 1.09 Ͻ1 R334W 1.09 Ͻ1 S492F 1.09 Ͻ1 T501A 1.09 Ͻ1 R553X 1.09 Ͻ1 Ͻ1 E588V 1.09 Ͻ1 R668C 1.09 Ͻ1 Q890X 1.09 Ͻ1 W1089X 1.09 Ͻ1 S1235R 1.09 Ͻ1 D1445N 1.09 Ͻ1 3876delA 1.09 3.24 1717 - 8GϾA 1.09 Ͻ1 3272 - 26AϾG 1.09 Ͻ1 A1009T 1.09 Ͻ1 deltaI507 Ͻ1 3.45 1.30 S549N Ͻ1 3.45 1.95 G567A Ͻ1 Ͻ1 I148T 2.07 1.08 I506T 1.38 Ͻ1 N1303K 2.76 1.08 935delA 1.38 1.30 2183AAϾG 1.38 Ͻ1 3199del6 1.38 Ͻ1 3849 ϩ 10kbCϾT Ͻ1 1.30 ACMG/ACOG italicized. Login to comment

[hide] Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and ... Hum Mutat. 2000;16(2):143-56. Claustres M, Guittard C, Bozon D, Chevalier F, Verlingue C, Ferec C, Girodon E, Cazeneuve C, Bienvenu T, Lalau G, Dumur V, Feldmann D, Bieth E, Blayau M, Clavel C, Creveaux I, Malinge MC, Monnier N, Malzac P, Mittre H, Chomel JC, Bonnefont JP, Iron A, Chery M, Georges MD
Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and in congenital absence of the vas deferens in France.
Hum Mutat. 2000;16(2):143-56., [PMID:10923036]

Abstract [show]
We have collated the results of cystic fibrosis (CF) mutation analysis conducted in 19 laboratories in France. We have analyzed 7, 420 CF alleles, demonstrating a total of 310 different mutations including 24 not reported previously, accounting for 93.56% of CF genes. The most common were F508del (67.18%; range 61-80), G542X (2.86%; range 1-6.7%), N1303K (2.10%; range 0.75-4.6%), and 1717-1G>A (1.31%; range 0-2.8%). Only 11 mutations had relative frequencies >0. 4%, 140 mutations were found on a small number of CF alleles (from 29 to two), and 154 were unique. These data show a clear geographical and/or ethnic variation in the distribution of the most common CF mutations. This spectrum of CF mutations, the largest ever reported in one country, has generated 481 different genotypes. We also investigated a cohort of 800 French men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and identified a total of 137 different CFTR mutations. Screening for the most common CF defects in addition to assessment for IVS8-5T allowed us to detect two mutations in 47.63% and one in 24.63% of CBAVD patients. In a subset of 327 CBAVD men who were more extensively investigated through the scanning of coding/flanking sequences, 516 of 654 (78. 90%) alleles were identified, with 15.90% and 70.95% of patients carrying one or two mutations, respectively, and only 13.15% without any detectable CFTR abnormality. The distribution of genotypes, classified according to the expected effect of their mutations on CFTR protein, clearly differed between both populations. CF patients had two severe mutations (87.77%) or one severe and one mild/variable mutation (11.33%), whereas CBAVD men had either a severe and a mild/variable (87.89%) or two mild/variable (11.57%) mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
109 h M1K, K14X, W19X, 211delG, G27E, R31C, 237insA, 241delAT, Q39X, 244delTA, 296+2T>C, 297-3C>T, W57X+F87L, 306delTAGA, P67L, A72D, 347delC, R75Q, 359insT, 394delT, 405+4A>G, Q98R, 457TAT>G, R117H+5T, R117H+I1027T, R117L, R117P, H139R, A141D, M152V, N186K, D192N, D192del, E193X, 711+1G>A, 711+3A>G, 712-1G>T, L206F, W216X, C225R, Q237E, G241R, 852del22, 876-14del12, 905delG, 993del5, E292K, Y304X, F311del, 1161delC, R347L, R352Q, W361R, 1215delG, S364P, S434X, D443Y, S466X, C491R, T501A, I506T, F508C, I507del+F508C, F508del+L467F, 1774delCT, R553G, 1802delC, 1806delA, A559E, Y563N, 1833delT, Y569C, Y569H, Y569X, G576X, G576A, T582I, 1898+3A>G+186-13C>G, 1918delGC, R600G, L610S, G628R, 2043delG, 2118del4, E664X, 2174insA, Q689X, K698R, K716X, L732X, 2347delG, 2372del8, R764X, 2423delG, S776X, 2634insT, 2640delT, C866Y, 2752-1G>T, W882X, Y913C, V920M, 2896insAG, H939D, H939R, D979V, D985H, D993Y, 3120G>A, I1005R, 3195del6, 3293delA, 3320ins5, W1063X, A1067T, 3359delCT, T1086I, W1089X, Y1092X+S1235R, W1098X, E1104X, R1128X, 3532AC>GTA, 3548TCAT>G, M1140del, 3600G>A, R1162L, 3667ins4, 3732delA+K1200E, S1206X, 3791delC, S1235R+5T, Q1238R, Q1238X, 3849+4A>G, T1246I, 3869insG, S1255P, R1283K, F1286S, 4005+1G>T, 4006-8T>A, 4015delA, N1303H, N1303I, 4172delGC, 4218insT, 4326delTC, Q1382X, 4375-1C>T, 4382delA, D1445N, CF40kbdel4-10, Cfdel17b. Login to comment

[hide] High heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis in Spanish ... Hum Genet. 1997 Dec;101(3):365-70. Casals T, Ramos MD, Gimenez J, Larriba S, Nunes V, Estivill X
High heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis in Spanish families: 75 mutations account for 90% of chromosomes.
Hum Genet. 1997 Dec;101(3):365-70., [PMID:9439669]

Abstract [show]
We have analyzed 640 Spanish cystic fibrosis (CF) families for mutations in the CFTR gene by direct mutation analysis, microsatellite haplotypes, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, single-strand conformation analysis and direct sequencing. Seventy-five mutations account for 90.2% of CF chromosomes. Among these we have detected seven novel CFTR mutations, including four missense (G85V, T582R, R851L and F1074L), two nonsense (E692X and Q1281X) and one splice site mutation (711+3A-->T). Three variants, two in intronic regions (406-112A/T and 3850-129T/C) and one in the coding region (741C/T) were also identified. Mutations G85V, T582R, R851L, E692X and Q1281X are severe, with lung and pancreatic involvement; 711+3A-->T could be responsible for a pancreatic sufficiency/insufficiency variable phenotype; and F1074L was associated with a mild phenotype. These data demonstrate the highest molecular heterogeneity reported so far in CF, indicating that a wide mutation screening is necessary to characterize 90% of the Spanish CF alleles.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
33 Eight mutations have frequencies 366 Table 1 Seventy-five CFTR mutations identified in 640 Spanish families with cystic fibrosis (CF) Mutation Exon/intron CF alleles % ∆F508 E.10 681 53.20 G542X E.11 108 8.43 N1303K E.21 34 2.65 1811+1.6kbA→Ga I.11 24 1.87 711+1G→T I.5 22 1.71 R1162Xa E.19 21 1.64 R334Wa E.7 21 1.64 R1066C E.17b 14 1.09 1609delCAa E.10 13 1.01 Q890X E.15 13 1.01 G85E E.3 12 0.94 712-1G→Ta I.5 11 0.86 2789+5G→A I.14b 11 0.86 ∆I507 E.10 10 0.78 W1282X E.20 10 0.78 2869insGa E.15 9 0.70 L206W E.6a 7 0.54 R709X E.13 7 0.54 621+1G→T I.4 6 0.47 3272-26A→G I.17a 6 0.47 R347H E.7 5 0.39 2183AA→G E.13 5 0.39 K710X E.13 5 0.39 2176insC E.13 5 0.39 3849+10kbC→T I.19 5 0.39 P205Sa E.6a 4 0.31 1078delT E.7 4 0.31 R553X E.11 4 0.31 G551D E.11 4 0.31 1812-1G→Aa I.11 4 0.31 CFdel#1a E.4-7/11-18 4 0.31 V232D E.6a 3 0.23 936delTAa E.6b 3 0.23 1717-8G→A I.10 3 0.23 1949del84 E.13 3 0.23 W1089X E.17b 3 0.23 R347P E.7 3 0.23 del E.3a E.3 2 0.16 R117H E.4 2 0.16 L558S E.11 2 0.16 A561E E.12 2 0.16 2603delT E.13 2 0.16 Y1092X E.17b 2 0.16 Q1100Pa E.17b 2 0.16 M1101K E.17b 2 0.16 delE.19a E.19 2 0.16 G1244E E.20 2 0.16 P5La E.1 1 0.08 Q30Xa E.2 1 0.08 G85Va E.3 1 0.08 E92Ka E.4 1 0.08 A120Ta E.4 1 0.08 I148T E.4 1 0.08 711+3A→Ta I.5 1 0.08 H199Y E.6a 1 0.08 875+1G→A I.6a 1 0.08 Table 1 (continued) Mutation Exon/intron CF alleles % 1717-1G→A I.10 1 0.08 L571S E.12 1 0.08 T582Ra E.12 1 0.08 E585X E.12 1 0.08 1898+3A→G I.12 1 0.08 G673X E.13 1 0.08 E692Xa E.13 1 0.08 R851X E.14a 1 0.08 R851La E.14a 1 0.08 A1006E E.17a 1 0.08 L1065Ra E.17b 1 0.08 F1074La E.17b 1 0.08 R1158X E.19 1 0.08 3667del4a E.19 1 0.08 3860ins31a E.20 1 0.08 3905insT E.20 1 0.08 4005+1G→A I.20 1 0.08 Q1281Xa E.20 1 0.08 Q1313X E.21 1 0.08 Known mutations (75) 1155 90.23 Unknown mutations 125 9.77 a Mutations discovered by the CF group of the Medical and Molecular Genetics Centre - IRO, Barcelona, Spain that range between 0.5% and 0.9%, representing 6.0% of the CF chromosomes. Login to comment

[hide] A cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regula... Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Jun;155(6):1914-20. Kerem E, Rave-Harel N, Augarten A, Madgar I, Nissim-Rafinia M, Yahav Y, Goshen R, Bentur L, Rivlin J, Aviram M, Genem A, Chiba-Falek O, Kraemer MR, Simon A, Branski D, Kerem B
A cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator splice variant with partial penetrance associated with variable cystic fibrosis presentations.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Jun;155(6):1914-20., [PMID:9196095]

Abstract [show]
Some patients express various features of cystic fibrosis (CF) even though essential characteristics of the disease might be absent. Such patients may suffer from respiratory disease without pancreatic insufficiency and normal sweat chloride levels. Others may present as male infertility because of congenital bilateral aplasia of the vas deferens (CBAVD) with no other signs of CF. The 5T allele, a DNA variant in a noncoding region of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene that reduces the level of the normal CFTR transcripts, was found in increased frequency among male patients with CBAVD. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility that the 5T allele is associated with dysfunction of organs other than the male reproductive system, leading to CF or atypical CF. Analysis of the 5T allele was performed on 148 subjects (29 with CF, 61 with atypical CF, and 58 with CBAVD) carrying 232 chromosomes with unidentified CFTR mutations, and on 142 non-CF chromosomes from healthy subjects of Ashkenazi origin. The frequency of the 5T allele among chromosomes from patients of Jewish Ashkenazi origin with CF and atypical CF (six of 33; 18%) was significantly higher than the frequency in the normal Ashkenazi population (eight of 142; 6%; p = 0.03). Analysis of the clinical presentation of the five patients with CF and the 12 patients with atypical CF carrying the 5T allele indicated that most patients suffered from respiratory disease presenting as asthma like symptoms, nasal polyposis, chronic sinusitis, chronic bronchitis, or bronchiectasis. Six patients had pancreatic insufficiency, two with meconium ileus. Sweat Cl- levels ranged from normal to elevated. Of the six male patients with respiratory disease who were old enough to be evaluated for fertility status, five were fertile and one had pancreatic insufficiency. Among male patients with CBAVD, 41% suffered from respiratory symptoms. Thus, the 5T allele is a variant with partial penetrance causing disease with an extreme variability of clinical presentation: from normal healthy fertile subjects or male patients with CBAVD to those with atypical or typical clinical phenotype of CF.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
51 In cases in which family members were not available, the assignment was performed by the complete correlation between the 9T allele and the AF508 and the N1303K, and between the 7T allele and the W1282X, G85E, D1152H, and W1089X mutations. Login to comment
121 Diagnosis (yr) (yr) (mmol/L) PI MI Polyps Sinus ectasis Culture (% pred) Fertility Genotype Comments 1 CF F/9 0 110 + + - + + H flu 77 5T/W1089X 2 CF F/20 0.25 118 + - - + + PSA 43 5T/AF508 3 CF M/1 3 0.5 ND + - - + - H flu 108 ST/ Infantile asthma resolved at 5 yr of age. Login to comment

[hide] CFTR haplotype analysis reveals genetic heterogene... Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jun;56(6):1359-66. Rave-Harel N, Madgar I, Goshen R, Nissim-Rafinia M, Ziadni A, Rahat A, Chiba O, Kalman YM, Brautbar C, Levinson D, et al.
CFTR haplotype analysis reveals genetic heterogeneity in the etiology of congenital bilateral aplasia of the vas deferens.
Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jun;56(6):1359-66., [PMID:7539210]

Abstract [show]
Congenital bilateral aplasia of the vas deferens (CBAVD) was suggested to be a mild form of cystic fibrosis (CF). Mutation analysis of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in males with CBAVD revealed that in some males CBAVD is caused by two defective CFTR alleles. The genetic basis of CBAVD in the other males and its association with CF remained unclear. We undertook this study to test the hypothesis of commonality of CBAVD and CF by haplotype analysis, in the CFTR locus, of males suffering from CBAVD and of their families. According to the hypothesis of commonality of CBAVD and CF, two brothers with CBAVD are expected to carry the same two CFTR alleles, while their fertile brothers are expected to carry at least one different allele. Eleven families were studied, of which two families, with unidentified CFTR mutations, did not support this hypothesis. In these families two brothers with CBAVD inherited different CFTR alleles. Their fertile brothers inherited the same CFTR alleles as their brothers with CBAVD. These results provide evidence for genetic heterogeneity in CBAVD. Though in some families CBAVD is associated with two CFTR mutations, we suggest that in others it is caused by other mechanisms, such as mutations at other loci or homozygosity or heterozygosity for partially penetrant CFTR mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
38 The entire studied group of males with CBAVD was tested for 16 CFTR mutations, using DNA-PCR amplification (Saiki et al. 1985, 1988), followed by specific tests as described elsewhere: AF508 (Rommens et al. 1990); W1282X (Shoshani et al. 1992a); G542X, S549R, S549I, and 1717-1G-+A, by direct sequencing of exon 11, using oligonucleotide primers (Zielenski et al. 1991b); N1303K (Osborne et al. 1991); 3849+10Kb C&-T (Highsmith et al. 1994); W1089X and 4010delTATT (Shoshani et al. Login to comment
58 Mutation Analysis Fourteen CF-R mutations that were elsewhere identified among the Israeli CF patient population (Kerem et al. 1994) were analyzed: W1282X, AF508, N1303K, G542X, 3849+10Kb C--T, S549R, S549I, W1089X, 4010delTATT, G85E, 1717-1G--A, D1152H, 405+1G--A, and Q359K1T360K. Login to comment
59 Mutation Analysis Fourteen CF-R mutations that were elsewhere identified among the Israeli CF patient population (Kerem et al. 1994) were analyzed: W1282X, AF508, N1303K, G542X, 3849+10Kb C--T, S549R, S549I, W1089X, 4010delTATT, G85E, 1717-1G--A, D1152H, 405+1G--A, and Q359K1T360K. Login to comment

[hide] A cluster of cystic fibrosis mutations in exon 17b... J Med Genet. 1994 Sep;31(9):731-4. Mercier B, Lissens W, Novelli G, Kalaydjieva L, de Arce M, Kapranov N, Canki Klain N, Estivill X, Palacio A, Cashman S, et al.
A cluster of cystic fibrosis mutations in exon 17b of the CFTR gene: a site for rare mutations.
J Med Genet. 1994 Sep;31(9):731-4., [PMID:7529319]

Abstract [show]
Intensive screening has improved our understanding of the profile of mutations in the CFTR gene in which more than 400 mutations have been detected to date. In collaboration with several European laboratories we are involved in such analysis. We have identified 14 new mutations in exon 17b of CFTR, having analysed 780 CF chromosomes, and have compared the frequency of mutations in this exon with that of other regions of the CFTR gene. The results obtained indicate an accumulation of mutations, not only in regions encoding the two nucleotide binding folds, but also in those encoding transmembrane domains of the CFTR gene, in particular exon 17b.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
19 Most of these are missense mutations and as no functional test has been 732 Table 1 Mutations identified in exon 17b of the CFTR gene Mutation Nucleotide Modificationl Ethnic Rcferencesposition ongini (No) 3271-1 G--A 3272-1 G-A Belgian (1) 11F1052V 3286 T-G Belgian (1) 11HI054D 3292 CG French (1) 13G1061R 3313 G-C French (1) 113320 Dup 3320 Duplication of Breton (1) 6 CTATG R1066C 3328 CT French (1) 14 R1066L R1066H A1067T G1069R R1070Q 3359 del CT L1077P H1085R W1089X Y1092X M1IOIR 3329 3329 3331 3337 3341 G-T G-+A G-A G,A G--A 3359 3362 3386 3398 3408 3434 del CT T--C A-.G G-+A C +A T--G Spanish (5) French (1) Breton (1) Breton (1) Bulgarian (1) Bulgarian (3) Rumanian (1) Albanian (1) French (1) Italian (1) French (1) Spanish (1) French (4) Turkish (1I) * Bozon et al, personal communication. Login to comment
106 Two novel mutations in the CFTR gene: W1089X in exon 17B and 4010 del TATT in exon 21. Login to comment

[hide] Two novel mutations in the CFTR gene: W1089X in ex... Hum Mol Genet. 1994 Apr;3(4):657-8. Shoshani T, Augarten A, Yahav J, Gazit E, Kerem B
Two novel mutations in the CFTR gene: W1089X in exon 17B and 4010delTATT in exon 21.
Hum Mol Genet. 1994 Apr;3(4):657-8., [PMID:7520798]

Abstract [show]

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
1 4 -658 Two novel mutations in the CFTR gene: W1089X in exon 17B and 4010delTATT in exon 21 Tzipora Shoshanl, Arie Augarten1 . Login to comment
8 Analysis of BstNI digestion of the gertomic region surrounding the W1089X mutation. Login to comment
12 Digestion of DNA from individuals heterozygous for the W1089X mutation generates three bands, 208, 184 and 24 bp, again the 24 bp has migrated out of the gel (The patient and his mother, CF and M). Login to comment
19 This mutation, designated W1089X, is predicted to produce a truncated protein, which lacks part of the second transmembrane domain and the second nucleotide binding fold. Login to comment
22 Therefore, it is most likely that the W1089X termination mutation is a disease causing mutation. Login to comment
23 The W1089X mutation does not alter a restriction enzyme site, thus, to facilitate testing for this mutation, a restriction site generating PCR test (RG-PCR) was generated. Login to comment
24 The PCR was performed using the oligonucleotide primers 17bi-3 (8) and a mismatch primer, 5' GCTCTGAATTTACATACTGCCAC 3' artificially designed to create a BstNI site (CCTGG) with the normal sequence but not with the mutant W1089X sequence (CC- TAG). Login to comment
36 Testing 138 chromosomes carrying unidentified CF mutations revealed one more chromosome with the W1089X mutation. Login to comment
37 Both CF chromosome carrying the W1089X mutation carry the same extra- and intragenic haplotype, A112 (9). Login to comment

[hide] CFTR gene analysis in Latin American CF patients: ... J Cyst Fibros. 2007 May;6(3):194-208. Epub 2006 Sep 11. Perez MM, Luna MC, Pivetta OH, Keyeux G
CFTR gene analysis in Latin American CF patients: heterogeneous origin and distribution of mutations across the continent.
J Cyst Fibros. 2007 May;6(3):194-208. Epub 2006 Sep 11., [PMID:16963320]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is the most prevalent Mendelian disorder in European populations. Despite the fact that many Latin American countries have a predominant population of European-descent, CF has remained an unknown entity until recently. Argentina and Brazil have detected the first patients around three decades ago, but in most countries this disease has remained poorly documented. Recently, other countries started publishing their results. METHODS: We present a compilation and statistical analysis of the data obtained in 10 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Mexico, Uruguay and Venezuela), with a total of 4354 unrelated CF chromosomes studied. RESULTS: The results show a wide distribution of 89 different mutations, with a maximum coverage of 62.8% of CF chromosomes/alleles in the patient's sample. Most of these mutations are frequent in Spain, Italy, and Portugal, consistent with the origin of the European settlers. A few African mutations are also present in those countries which were part of the slave trade. New mutations were also found, possibly originating in America. CONCLUSION: The profile of mutations in the CFTR gene, which reflects the heterogeneity of its inhabitants, shows the complexity of the molecular diagnosis of CF mutations in most of the Latin American countries.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
42 Some have concentrated in the search of specific mutations that are Table 1 Mutations found in the Latin American CF patients Exon 1 p.L6VÌe; Exon 3 p.W57X, p.R75X, p.G85E Exon 4 p.R117H Exon 6a p.H199Y, p.V201M, p.L206W, p.Q220X, p.V232D, c.846delTÌe; Exon 6b p.Y275XÌe;, c.935delA Exon 7 p.R334W, p.R347P, p.Y362XÌe;, c.1078delT, c.1215delG Exon 8 c.1323_1324insAÌe; Exon 9 c.1460_1461delATÌe;, c.1353_1354insTÌe;,# Exon 10 p.I506T, p.I507del, p.F508del Exon 11 p.G542X, p.S549N, p.S549R, p.G551D, p.G551S, p.R553X, p.L558S, p.A559T, c.1782delA Exon 12 p.S589I Exon 13 p.H609RÌe;, p.P750L, p.V754M, c.1924_1930del, c.2055_2063del, c.2183AA NG;c.2184delA, c.2184delA, c.2185_2186insC, c.2347delG, c.2566_2567insTÌe;, c.2594_2595delGTÌe; Exon 14a p.R851L, c.2686_2687insTÌe; Exon 15 c.2869_2870insG Exon 16 c.3120+1GNA Exon 17a p.I1027T, c.3171delC, c.3199_3204del Exon 17b p.G1061R, p.R1066C, p.W1069X#, p.W1089X, p.Y1092X, p.W1098CÌe; Exon 19 p.R1162X, p.W1204X, p.Q1238X, c.3617_3618delGAÌe;#, c.3659delC Exon 20 p.W1282X, p.R1283M Exon 21 p.N1303K, c.4016_4017insT Exon 22 c.4160_4161insGGGGÌe; 5' flanking c.-834GNT Intron 2 c.297-1GNAÌe;, c.297-2ANG Intron 3 c.406-1GNA Intron 4 c.621+1GNT Intron 5 c.711+1GNT Intron 8 c.IVS8-5T Intron 10 c.1716GNA, c.1717-1GNA Intron 11 c.1811+1.6KbANG, c.1812-1GNA Intron 12 c.1898+1GNA, c.1898+3ANG Intron 14 c.2789+2_2789+3insA, c.2789+5GNA Intron 17a c.3272-26ANG Intron 17b c.3500-2ANGÌe; Intron 19 c.3849+1GNA, c.3849+10KbCNT Intron 20 c.4005+1GNA, c.4005-1GNA# Mutations are listed according to their position in the gene. Login to comment
51 Table 2 p.I507del p.S549N p.S549R p.G551D p.G551S p.R553X p.L558S p.A559T p.S589I p.H609RÌe; p.P750L p.V754M p.R851L p.I1027T p.G1061R p.R1066C p.W1069X# p.W1089X p.Y1092X p.W1098CÌe; p.W1204X 3 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 4 1 2 3 1 3 0.24 1 0.08 1 0.08 6 0.48 2 0.16 1 0.08 1 0.08 4 0.32 1 0.08 1 4 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.05 10 0.54 1 0.05 2 0.11 3 0.16 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0.79 4 1.58 4 1 1 1 1 4 1.83 1 0.46 1 0.46 1 0.46 1 0.46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1.82 6 2.19 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 0.36 1 1.31 1 1.31 1 1.31 10 6 6 6 1 22 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 3 5 1 1 0.23 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.51 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.02 0.02 (continued on next page) Table 2 Mutation frequencies in Latin American CF patients Country p.Q1238X p.R1283M c.-834GNT c.297-1GNA* c.297-2ANG c.406-1GNA c.621+1GNT c.711+1GNT c.846delT* c.935delA c.1078delT c.1215delG c.1323_1324insA* c.1353_1354insT*# c.1460_1461delAT* Argentina 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 Subtotal and frequency (%) 1 0.08 1 0.08 4 0.32 1 0.08 1 0.08 1 0.08 Brazil 1 1 1 1 0 0 Subtotal and frequency (%) 1 0.05 2 0.11 1 0.05 Chile 0 0 Subtotal and frequency (%) Colombia 1 1 Subtotal and frequency (%) 1 0.46 1 0.46 Costa Rica Frequency (%) 0 Cuba Frequency (%) Ecuador Subtotal and frequency (%) Mexico 1 3 1 2 1 1 Subtotal and frequency (%) 1 0.36 3 1.09 1 0.36 1 0.36 2 0.73 1 0.36 Uruguay Frequency (%) 1 1.31 Venezuela Subtotal and frequency (%) Total 1 1 1 1 1 3 7 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Frequency (%) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.16 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 (continued ) Table 2 c.1716GNA c.1717-1GNA c.1782delA c.1811+1,6KbANG c.1812-1GNA c.1898+1GNA c.1898+3ANG c.1924_1930del c.2055_2063del c.2183AANG;c.2184delA c.2184delA c.2185_2186insC 5 1 4 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 6 0.48 1 0.08 6 0.48 2 0.16 1 0.08 1 0.08 1 0.08 1 0 6 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 7 0.37 5 0.27 1 0.05 3 0.16 0 0 12 1 12 5.50 1 0.46 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 0.36 1 0.36 2 0.73 2 0.73 1 1.31 1 14 1 18 5 3 1 1 2 6 1 1 0.02 0.32 0.02 0.41 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.14 0.02 0.02 (continued on next page) Table 2 Mutation frequencies in Latin American CF patients Country c.2347delG c.2566_2567insT* c.2594_2595delGT* c.2686_2687insT* c.2789+2_2789+3insA c.2789+5GNA c.2869_2870insG c.3120+1GNA c.3171delC c.3199_3204del c.3272-26ANG c.3500-2ANG* Argentina 2 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 Subtotal and frequency (%) 2 0.16 1 0.08 2 0.16 2 0.16 6 0.48 1 0.08 1 0.08 2 0.16 Brazil 2 1 1 1 6 0 0 4 0 Subtotal and frequency (%) 2 0.11 1 0.05 1 0.05 10 0.54 1 0.05 Chile Subtotal and frequency (%) Colombia 1 1 1 Subtotal and frequency (%) 1 0.46 1 0.46 1 0.46 Costa Rica Frequency (%) Cuba Frequency (%) Ecuador Subtotal and frequency (%) Mexico 2 Subtotal and frequency (%) 2 0.73 Uruguay Frequency (%) 1 1.31 Venezuela Subtotal and frequency (%) Total 2 2 1 3 2 9 1 12 1 2 2 1 Frequency (%) 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.07 0.05 0.21 0.02 0.28 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.02 (continued ) Table 2 c.3617_3618delGA*,# c.3659delC c.3849+1GNA c.3849+10kbCNT c.4005+1GNA c.4005-1GNA# c.4016_4017insT c.4160_4161insGGGG* c.IVS8-5T Unknown Authors 37 Aulehla-Scholz [17] 2 4 1 2 4 76 Visich [12] 1 78 Iba&#f1;ez [18] 54 Varela 2004 8 Prieto [19] 2 1 1 1 18 Oller-Ramirez 2004 4 0.32 6 0.48 1 0.08 1 0.08 2 0.16 5 0.40 271 21.75 205 Raskin [20] 32 Chiba [21] 1 89 Bernardino [22] 60 Marostica [23] 69 Parizotto [24] 99 Cabello [25,26] 33 Martins [27] 70 Streit [28] 0 5 120 Raskin [15] 0 0 12 Goloni-Bertollo [29] 1 0.05 5 0.27 789 42.46 48 Rios [30] 22 Molina [31] 1 11 Navarro [32] 0 3 34 Repetto [33] 4 1.58 115 45.63 1 67 Keyeux [14] 17 Restrepo [34] 1 0.46 84 38.53 0 25 52.08 Venegas [35] 95 65.97 Collazo [36] 20 Merino [37] 30 Cassiman 2004 15 Paz-y-Mino [38] 65 63.72 1 1 53 Orozco [13] 2 35 Villalobos [39] 3 1.09 1 0.36 88 32.11 11 14.47 Luzardo [40,41] 36 Restrepo [34] 41 Alvarado [42] 77 56.62 1 4 1 18 1 1 2 1 5 1620 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.41 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.11 37.21 Mutation frequencies in Latin American CF patients most frequently found in Caucasians, by allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR), enzymatic digestion, allele specific oligonucleotide hybridization (ASO), or using mainly commercial kits, whereas other studies used a systematic approach to analyse the promoter, coding and exon/ intron boundaries of the CFTR region in the search for any possible mutation. Login to comment

[hide] Novel CFTR variants identified during the first 3 ... J Mol Diagn. 2013 Sep;15(5):710-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Prach L, Koepke R, Kharrazi M, Keiles S, Salinas DB, Reyes MC, Pian M, Opsimos H, Otsuka KN, Hardy KA, Milla CE, Zirbes JM, Chipps B, O'Bra S, Saeed MM, Sudhakar R, Lehto S, Nielson D, Shay GF, Seastrand M, Jhawar S, Nickerson B, Landon C, Thompson A, Nussbaum E, Chin T, Wojtczak H
Novel CFTR variants identified during the first 3 years of cystic fibrosis newborn screening in California.
J Mol Diagn. 2013 Sep;15(5):710-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jun 28., [PMID:23810505]

Abstract [show]
California uses a unique method to screen newborns for cystic fibrosis (CF) that includes gene scanning and DNA sequencing after only one California-40 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) panel mutation has been identified in hypertrypsinogenemic specimens. Newborns found by sequencing to have one or more additional mutations or variants (including novel variants) in the CFTR gene are systematically followed, allowing for prospective assessment of the pathogenic potential of these variants. During the first 3 years of screening, 55 novel variants were identified. Six of these novel variants were discovered in five screen-negative participants and three were identified in multiple unrelated participants. Ten novel variants (c.2554_2555insT, p.F1107L, c.-152G>C, p.L323P, p.L32M, c.2883_2886dupGTCA, c.2349_2350insT, p.K114del, c.-602A>T, and c.2822delT) were associated with a CF phenotype (42% of participants were diagnosed at 4 to 25 months of age), whereas 26 were associated with CFTR-related metabolic syndrome to date. Associations with the remaining novel variants were confounded by the presence of other diseases or other mutations in cis or by inadequate follow-up. These findings have implications for how CF newborn screening and follow-up is conducted and will help guide which genotypes should, and which should not, be considered screen positive for CF in California and elsewhere.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
26 Newborns were screened using the California method, which includes i) analysis of serum immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) levels using the AutoDELFIA neonatal IRT L kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) in all newborn blood spot specimens, ii) CFTR mutation panel [29-40 mutations (the mutations on the California panel were selected for the most part according to allelic frequencies found in a comprehensively genotyped group of California CF cases to achieve a 95% race/ethnicity-specific rate of CF case detection in black, white, and Hispanic individuals in California and include c.1585-1G>A, c.1680-1G>A, c.1973-1985del13insAGAAA, c.2175_2176insA, c.164 &#fe; 2T>A (removed on August 12, 2008), c.2988 &#fe; 1G>A, c.3717 &#fe; 12191C>T, c.3744delA, c.274-1G>A, c.489 &#fe; 1G>T, c.579 &#fe; 1G>T, p.A559T, p.F311del, p.F508del, p.I507del, p.G542X, p.G551D, p.G85E, p.H199Y, p.N1303K, p.R1066C, p.R1162X, p.R334W, p.R553X, p.S549N, p.W1089X, p.W1204X (c.3611G>A), p.W1282X, c.1153_1154insAT [added October 4, 2007], c.1923_1931del9insA, c.3140-26A>G, c.531delT, c.803delA, c.54-5940_273 &#fe; 10250del21kb, p.P205S, p.Q98R, p.R75X, p.S492F [added December 12, 2007], c.3659delC, p.G330X, p.W1204X [c.3612G>A] [added August 12, 2008] [Signature CF 2.0 ASR; Asuragen Inc., Austin, TX])] testing of specimens with IRT 62 ng/mL (highest 1.5%), iii) CFTR gene scanning and sequence analysis (Ambry Test: CF; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA) for specimens found to have only one mutation after CFTR mutation panel testing, and iv) referral to 1 of 15 pediatric CF care centers (CFCs) for sweat chloride (SC) testing and follow-up of all newborns with either two CFTR mutations detected during panel testing or one CFTR mutation detected during panel testing and one (or more) additional CFTR mutation and/or variant detected during sequencing. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a North Ameri... Genet Med. 2014 Jul;16(7):539-46. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.188. Epub 2013 Dec 19. Zvereff VV, Faruki H, Edwards M, Friedman KJ
Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a North American population.
Genet Med. 2014 Jul;16(7):539-46. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.188. Epub 2013 Dec 19., [PMID:24357848]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the mutation frequency distribution for a 32-mutation panel and a 69-mutation panel used for cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Further aims of the study were to examine the race-specific detection rates provided by both panels and to assess the performance of extended panels in large-scale, population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Although genetic screening for the most common CFTR mutations allows detection of nearly 90% of cystic fibrosis carriers, the large number of other mutations, and their distribution within different ethnic groups, limits the utility of general population screening. METHODS: Patients referred for cystic fibrosis screening from January 2005 through December 2010 were tested using either a 32-mutation panel (n = 1,601,308 individuals) or a 69-mutation panel (n = 109,830). RESULTS: The carrier frequencies observed for the 69-mutation panel study population (1/36) and Caucasian (1/27) and African-American individuals (1/79) agree well with published cystic fibrosis carrier frequencies; however, a higher carrier frequency was observed for Hispanic-American individuals (1/48) using the 69-mutation panel as compared with the 32-mutation panel (1/69). The 69-mutation panel detected ~20% more mutations than the 32-mutation panel for both African-American and Hispanic-American individuals. CONCLUSION: Expanded panels using race-specific variants can improve cystic fibrosis carrier detection rates within specific populations. However, it is important that the pathogenicity and the relative frequency of these variants are confirmed.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
63 This threshold could not be reached Table 1ߒ CFTR allele frequency identified by the CF32 mutation panel Varianta Number of detected alleles Mutation (%) Legacy nomenclature HGVS nomenclature F508delb p.F508del 31,142 68.69 R117Hb p.R117H 5,198 11.46 G542Xb p.G542X 1,162 2.56 G551Db p.G551D 989 2.18 W1282Xb p.W1282X 824 1.82 3120ߙ+ߙ1G>Ab c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A 706 1.56 N1303Kb p.N1303K 648 1.43 R553Xb p.R553X 487 1.07 3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC>Tb c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T 436 0.96 621ߙ+ߙ1G>Tb c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T 410 0.90 1717-1G>Ab c.1585-1G>A 388 0.86 2789ߙ+ߙ5G>Ab c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A 382 0.84 I507delb p.I507del 258 0.57 R334Wb p.R334W 257 0.57 R1162Xb p.R1162X 211 0.47 G85Eb p.G85E 199 0.44 1898ߙ+ߙ1G>Ab c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A 170 0.37 R347Hc p.R347H 160 0.35 3659delCb c.3528delC 155 0.34 3876delAc c.3744delA 153 0.34 R560Tb p.R560T 132 0.29 S549Nc p.S549N 125 0.28 3905insTc c.3773dupT 121 0.27 R347Pb p.R347P 117 0.26 2184delAb c.2052delA 107 0.24 A455Eb p.A455E 106 0.23 711ߙ+ߙ1G>Tb c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T 65 0.14 394delTTc c.262_263delTT 56 0.12 V520Fc p.V520F 54 0.12 1078delTc c.948delT 52 0.11 2183AA>Ga,c c.2051_2052delAAinsG 37 0.08 S549Rc p.S549R 31 0.07 Total 45,338 100 a 2183AA>G variant was added to the panel in 2010. b Variants from ACMG/ACOG CF screening panel. c Classified as a CF-causing mutation by the CFTR2 Database. ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; CF, cystic fibrosis; HGVS, Human Genome Variation Society. Table 2ߒ Continued on next page Table 2ߒ CFTR allele frequency identified by the CF69 mutation panel Varianta Allele frequency Mutation (%) Legacy nomenclature HGVS nomenclature F508delb p.F508del 1,868 60.49 R117Hb p.R117H 274 8.87 D1152Hc p.D1152H 125 4.05 G542Xb p.G542X 98 3.17 L206Wd p.L206W 73 2.36 3120ߙ+ߙ1G>Ab c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A 65 2.10 G551Db p.G551D 47 1.52 N1303Kb p.N1303K 42 1.36 W1282Xb p.W1282X 38 1.23 3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC>Tb c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T 28 0.91 3876delAd c.3744delA 28 0.91 F311dele p.F312del 24 0.78 I507delb p.I507del 24 0.78 R553Xb p.R553X 24 0.78 R117Cd p.R117C 22 0.71 621ߙ+ߙ1G>Tb c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T 21 0.68 1717-1G>Ab c.1585-1G>A 18 0.58 S549Nd p.S549N 18 0.58 R334Wb p.R334W 17 0.55 2789ߙ+ߙ5G>Ab c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A 16 0.52 G85Eb p.G85E 14 0.45 3199del6e c.3067_3072delATAGTG 12 0.39 R1066Cd p.R1066C 11 0.36 1898ߙ+ߙ1G>Ab c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A 10 0.32 R347Hd p.R347H 10 0.32 R1162 Xb p.R1162X 9 0.29 W1089Xd p.W1089X 9 0.29 2184delAb c.2052delA 8 0.26 2307insAd c.2175dupA 8 0.26 1078delTd c.948delT 7 0.23 R75Xd p.R75X 7 0.23 3120G>Ad c.2988 G>A 6 0.19 3659delCb c.3528delC 6 0.19 Q493Xd p.Q493X 6 0.19 R1158Xd p.R1158X 6 0.19 R560Tb p.R560T 6 0.19 1812-1G>Ad c.1680-1G>A 5 0.16 2055del9>Ad c.1923_1931del9insA 5 0.16 406-1G>Ad c.274-1G>A 5 0.16 A559Td p.A559T 5 0.16 R347Pb p.R347P 5 0.16 S1255Xd p.S1255X 5 0.16 1677delTAd c.1545_1546delTA 4 0.13 711ߙ+ߙ1G>Tb c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T 4 0.13 E60Xd p.E60X 4 0.13 R352Qd p.R352Q 4 0.13 Y1092Xd p.Y1092X 4 0.13 2183AA>Gd c.2051_2052delAAinsG 3 0.10 3791delCd c.3659delC 3 0.10 3905insTd c.3773dupT 3 0.10 by 10 variants: the 2143delT, A455E, S549R, Y122X, and M1101K mutations, typically observed in Caucasians; 935delA, 2869insG, and Q890X in Hispanics; and 405+3A>C and G480C in the African-American population. Login to comment
107 These variants are 3876delA, S549N, 406-1G>A, 3199del6, W1089X, R1158X, R352Q, and 2183AA>G, and they account for 8.1% of the mutations detected in the Hispanic population. Login to comment
117 Four ethnicity-specific variants (R352Q, 406-1G>A, 3199del6, and W1089X) and 12 panethnic variants were detected. Login to comment

[hide] Impact of heterozygote CFTR mutations in COPD pati... Respir Res. 2014 Feb 11;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-18. Raju SV, Tate JH, Peacock SK, Fang P, Oster RA, Dransfield MT, Rowe SM
Impact of heterozygote CFTR mutations in COPD patients with chronic bronchitis.
Respir Res. 2014 Feb 11;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-18., [PMID:24517344]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking causes Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S. CFTR ion transport dysfunction has been implicated in COPD pathogenesis, and is associated with chronic bronchitis. However, susceptibility to smoke induced lung injury is variable and the underlying genetic contributors remain unclear. We hypothesized that presence of CFTR mutation heterozygosity may alter susceptibility to cigarette smoke induced CFTR dysfunction. Consequently, COPD patients with chronic bronchitis may have a higher rate of CFTR mutations compared to the general population. METHODS: Primary human bronchial epithelial cells derived from F508del CFTR heterozygotes and mice with (CFTR+/-) and without (CFTR+/+) CFTR heterozygosity were exposed to whole cigarette smoke (WCS); CFTR-dependent ion transport was assessed by Ussing chamber electrophysiology and nasal potential difference measurements, respectively. Caucasians with COPD and chronic bronchitis, age 40 to 80 with FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 < 60% predicted, were selected for genetic analysis from participants in the NIH COPD Clinical Research Network's Azithromycin for Prevention of Exacerbations of COPD in comparison to 32,900 Caucasian women who underwent prenatal genetic testing. Genetic analysis involved an allele-specific genotyping of 89 CFTR mutations. RESULTS: Exposure to WCS caused a pronounced reduction in CFTR activity in both CFTR (+/+) cells and F508del CFTR (+/-) cells; however, neither the degree of decrement (44.7% wild-type vs. 53.5% F508del heterozygous, P = NS) nor the residual CFTR activity were altered by CFTR heterozygosity. Similarly, WCS caused a marked reduction in CFTR activity measured by NPD in both wild type and CFTR heterozygous mice, but the severity of decrement (91.1% wild type vs. 47.7% CF heterozygous, P = NS) and the residual activity were not significantly affected by CFTR genetic status. Five of 127 (3.9%) COPD patients with chronic bronchitis were heterozygous for CFTR mutations which was not significantly different from controls (4.5%) (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of WCS induced reductions in CFTR activity was not affected by the presence of CFTR mutation heterozygosity. CFTR mutations do not increase the risk of COPD with chronic bronchitis. CFTR dysfunction due to smoking is primarily an acquired phenomenon and is not affected by the presence of congenital CFTR mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
81 As expected based on genotype-phenotype correlations in the disease [33], HBE cells derived from a F508del CFTR heterozygote had slightly lower CFTR activity at baseline than wild type monolayers as measured by Table 1 List of CFTR mutations analyzed F508del R117H 1717-1G > A R117C G85E R334W 1898 + 1G > A Y122X A455E R347P 2184delA G178R I507del R553X 2789 + 5G > A G314E G542X R560T 3120 + 1G > A G330X G551D W1282X 3659delC R347H N1303K 621 + 1G > T K710X 406-1G > A R1162X 711 + 1G > T E60X G480C R1066C W1089X V520F A559T S1196X Q1238X S1251N S1255X 663delT 935delA 1161delC 1288insTA 2184insA 2307insA 2711delT 2869insG R709X R764X R1158X 574delA Q493X 1898 + 5G > T 3905insT I506T 3849 + 10kbC > T 712-1G > T Q98R Q552X S549N 1078delT H199Y 444delA S549R (T > G) 2143delT P205S 2043delG 1811 + 1.6kbA > G 3272-26A > G L206W 3791delC Y1092X (C > G) 3199del6 F508C 2108delA Y1092X (C > A) D1152H V520I 3667del4 394delTT 3876delA M1101K 1677delTA W1098X (TGA) 1812-1G > A 4016insT 1609delCA 3171delC response to forskolin stimulation (49.3 &#b1; 11.5 bc;A/cm2 in CFTR (+/+) vs. 40.5 &#b1; 5.3 bc;A/cm2 in CFTR (+/-), although this was not statistically significant (Figure 1A,B). Login to comment

[hide] Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis us... Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209. Baker MW, Atkins AE, Cordovado SK, Hendrix M, Earley MC, Farrell PM
Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study.
Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209., [PMID:25674778]

Abstract [show]
Purpose:Many regions have implemented newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) using a limited panel of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) mutations after immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) analysis. We sought to assess the feasibility of further improving the screening using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology.Methods:An NGS assay was used to detect 162 CFTR mutations/variants characterized by the CFTR2 project. We used 67 dried blood spots (DBSs) containing 48 distinct CFTR mutations to validate the assay. NGS assay was retrospectively performed on 165 CF screen-positive samples with one CFTR mutation.Results:The NGS assay was successfully performed using DNA isolated from DBSs, and it correctly detected all CFTR mutations in the validation. Among 165 screen-positive infants with one CFTR mutation, no additional disease-causing mutation was identified in 151 samples consistent with normal sweat tests. Five infants had a CF-causing mutation that was not included in this panel, and nine with two CF-causing mutations were identified.Conclusion:The NGS assay was 100% concordant with traditional methods. Retrospective analysis results indicate an IRT/NGS screening algorithm would enable high sensitivity, better specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). This study lays the foundation for prospective studies and for introducing NGS in NBS laboratories.Genet Med advance online publication 12 February 2015Genetics in Medicine (2015); doi:10.1038/gim.2014.209.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
15 Correspondence: Mei W. Baker (mwbaker@wisc.edu) Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study Mei W. Baker, MD1,2 , Anne E. Atkins, MPH2 , Suzanne K. Cordovado, PhD3 , Miyono Hendrix, MS3 , Marie C. Earley, PhD3 and Philip M. Farrell, MD, PhD1,4 Table 1ߒ CF-causing or varying consequences mutations in the MiSeqDx IUO Cystic Fibrosis System c.1521_1523delCTT (F508del) c.2875delG (3007delG) c.54-5940_273ߙ+ߙ10250del21kb (CFTRdele2,3) c.3909C>G (N1303K) c.3752G>A (S1251N) Mutations that cause CF when combined with another CF-causing mutation c.1624G>T (G542X) c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A (3120ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3964-78_4242ߙ+ߙ577del (CFTRdele22,23) c.613C>T (P205S) c.1021T>C (S341P) c.948delT (1078delT) c.2988G>A (3120G->A) c.328G>C (D110H) c.200C>T (P67L) c.1397C>A (S466X(C>A)) c.1022_1023insTC (1154insTC) c.2989-1G>A (3121-1G->A) c.3310G>T (E1104X) c.3937C>T (Q1313X) c.1397C>G (S466X(C>G)) c.1081delT (1213delT) c.3140-26A>G (3272-26A->G) c.1753G>T (E585X) c.658C>T (Q220X) c.1466C>A (S489X) c.1116ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1248ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3528delC (3659delC) c.178G>T (E60X) c.115C>T (Q39X) c.1475C>T (S492F) c.1127_1128insA (1259insA) c.3659delC (3791delC) c.2464G>T (E822X) c.1477C>T (Q493X) c.1646G>A (S549N) c.1209ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1341ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T (3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC->T) c.2491G>T (E831X) c.1573C>T (Q525X) c.1645A>C (S549R) c.1329_1330insAGAT (1461ins4) c.3744delA (3876delA) c.274G>A (E92K) c.1654C>T (Q552X) c.1647T>G (S549R) c.1393-1G>A (1525-1G->A) c.3773_3774insT (3905insT) c.274G>T (E92X) c.2668C>T (Q890X) c.2834C>T (S945L) c.1418delG (1548delG) c.262_263delTT (394delTT) c.3731G>A (G1244E) c.292C>T (Q98X) c.1013C>T (T338I) c.1545_1546delTA (1677delTA) c.3873ߙ+ߙ1G>A (4005ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.532G>A (G178R) c.3196C>T (R1066C) c.1558G>T (V520F) c.1585-1G>A (1717-1G->A) c.3884_3885insT (4016insT) c.988G>T (G330X) c.3197G>A (R1066H) c.3266G>A (W1089X) c.1585-8G>A (1717-8G->A) c.273ߙ+ߙ1G>A (405ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.1652G>A (G551D) c.3472C>T (R1158X) c.3611G>A (W1204X) c.1679ߙ+ߙ1.6kbA>G (1811ߙ+ߙ1.6kbA->G) c.274-1G>A (406-1G->A) c.254G>A (G85E) c.3484C>T (R1162X) c.3612G>A (W1204X) c.1680-1G>A (1812-1G->A) c.4077_4080delTGTTinsAA (4209TGTT->AA) c.2908G>C (G970R) c.349C>T (R117C) c.3846G>A (W1282X) c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1898ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.4251delA (4382delA) c.595C>T (H199Y) c.1000C>T (R334W) c.1202G>A (W401X) c.1766ߙ+ߙ3A>G (1898ߙ+ߙ 3A->G) c.325_327delTATinsG (457TAT->G) c.1007T>A (I336K) c.1040G>A (R347H) c.1203G>A (W401X) c.2012delT (2143delT) c.442delA (574delA) c.1519_1521delATC (I507del) c.1040G>C (R347P) c.2537G>A (W846X) c.2051_2052delAAinsG (2183AA->G) c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T (621ߙ+ߙ 1G->T) c.2128A>T (K710X) c.1055G>A (R352Q) c.3276C>A (Y1092X (C>A)) c.2052delA (2184delA) c.531delT (663delT) c.3194T>C (L1065P) c.1657C>T (R553X) c.3276C>G (Y1092X (C>G)) c.2052_2053insA (2184insA) c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T (711ߙ+ߙ 1G->T) c.3230T>C (L1077P) c.1679G>A (R560K) c.366T>A (Y122X) c.2175_2176insA (2307insA) c.579ߙ+ߙ3A>G (711ߙ+ߙ 3A->G) c.617T>G (L206W) c.1679G>C (R560T) - c.2215delG (2347delG) c.579ߙ+ߙ5G>A (711ߙ+ߙ 5G->A) c.1400T>C (L467P) c.2125C>T (R709X) - c.2453delT (2585delT) c.580-1G>T (712-1G->T) c.2195T>G (L732X) c.223C>T (R75X) - c.2490ߙ+ߙ1G>A (2622ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.720_741delAGGGAG AATGATGATGAAGTAC (852del22) c.2780T>C (L927P) c.2290C>T (R764X) - c.2583delT (2711delT) c.1364C>A (A455E) c.3302T>A (M1101K) c.2551C>T (R851X) - c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A (2789ߙ+ߙ5G->A) c.1675G>A (A559T) c.1A>G (M1V) c.3587C>G (S1196X) - Mutations/variants that were validated in this study are in bold. CF, cystic fibrosis. Table 1ߒ Continued on next page reduce carrier detection and potentially improve the positive predictive value (PPV), the NBS goals of equity and the highest possible sensitivity become more difficult to achieve. Login to comment

[hide] [CFTR gene sequencing in a group of Chilean patien... Rev Chil Pediatr. 2014 Jul;85(4):448-54. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062014000400007. Lay-Son R G, Vasquez D M, Puga Y A, Manque M P, Repetto L G
[CFTR gene sequencing in a group of Chilean patients with cystic fibrosis].
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2014 Jul;85(4):448-54. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062014000400007., [PMID:25697318]

Abstract [show]
INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder caused by mutations of the CFTR gene, in which over 1,900 different mutations have been identified. In Chile, the diagnosis panel with the 36 most common mutations detects approximately 50% of all alleles, while for Caucasians, it is nearly 90%. The objective of this study is to expand the capacity of mutational screening in Chilean patients and look for recurrent mutations at the national level. METHOD: The detection of unknown pathogenic alleles was assessed by CFTR gene sequencing in a selected group of patients from the National Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (NCFF). 39 patients, who met the CF diagnostic criteria and had only one allele identified according to the mutational panel, were studied. Massive sequencing was performed throughout the investigation and the main CFTR databases were used for analysis. RESULTS: The second pathogenic allele was identified in 16 of 39 patients of this study (41%), finding eleven different mutations that had not been reported in our population. We believe that the reason is that one of the variants had not been previously described. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations that had been described mainly in Hispanic and/or Mediterranean populations were identified. We found a variation that had not been previously reported, but not enough recurrent mutations that could explain the low rate of detection were found. Knowledge about mutations can provide appropriate genetic counseling and will be critical to evaluate the potential use of new targeted therapies for treating them.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
58 Mutaciones detectadas por secuenciaci&#f3;n masiva en cohorte de 39 pacientes chilenos con FQ portadores de un alelo desconocido Mutaci&#f3;n detectada (nomenclatura actual*) n de alelos Reporte en pacientes con FQ (no de alelos) Efecto Denominaci&#f3;n antigua c.1330_1331delAT 3 Argentina (1)a Prote&#ed;na truncada por generaci&#f3;n de cod&#f3;n de t&#e9;rmino 1460delAT c.314T>A 2 Francia (1)a Cambio de amino&#e1;cido Isoleucina por Asparagina I105N c.4046G>A 2 Italia (7)b,c , EEUU (1)d Cambio de amino&#e1;cido Glicina por Aspartato G1349D c.148T>C 2 Espa&#f1;a (2)e Cambio de amino&#e1;cido Serina por Prolina S50P c.695T>A 1 Espa&#f1;a (14)e,f , EEUU (hispanos) (5)g,h Francia (2)a , Brasil (1)i Cambio de amino&#e1;cido Valina por Aspartato V232D c.3266G>A 1 Espa&#f1;a (5)e , Brasil (2)i,j , EEUU (hispanos) (2)g , Argentina (1)k , Israel (1)l Prote&#ed;na truncada por generaci&#f3;n de cod&#f3;n de t&#e9;rmino W1089X c.1647T>G 1 Emiratos &#c1;rabes Unidos (> 30)m,n , Colombia (4)o , Israel (4)p , Argelia (2)p , Marruecos (2)q , Reino Unido (2)p , Portugal (1)p , Espa&#f1;a (1)p , Francia (1)p , Italia (1)p , Brasil (1)q , Argentina (1)q Cambio de amino&#e1;cido Serina por Arginina S549R(T- >G) c.308G>A 1 No descrita previamente Cambio de amino&#e1;cido Glicina por Glutamato G103E c.1680-1G>A 1 Espa&#f1;a (1)r Alteraci&#f3;n en splicing 1812-1G->A c.1679+1G>C 1 Francia (2)s Macedonia (1)s , Alteraci&#f3;n en splicing 1811+1G->C c.490-2A>G 1 Argentina (1)t Alteraci&#f3;n en splicing 622-2A->G FQ: Fibrosis qu&#ed;stica. Login to comment

[hide] The improvement of the best practice guidelines fo... Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99. Girardet A, Viart V, Plaza S, Daina G, De Rycke M, Des Georges M, Fiorentino F, Harton G, Ishmukhametova A, Navarro J, Raynal C, Renwick P, Saguet F, Schwarz M, SenGupta S, Tzetis M, Roux AF, Claustres M
The improvement of the best practice guidelines for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: toward an international consensus.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99., [PMID:26014425]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorders, giving couples the opportunity to conceive unaffected children without having to consider termination of pregnancy. However, there are no available standardized protocols, so that each center has to develop its own diagnostic strategies and procedures. Furthermore, reproductive decisions are complicated by the diversity of disease-causing variants in the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene and the complexity of correlations between genotypes and associated phenotypes, so that attitudes and practices toward the risks for future offspring can vary greatly between countries. On behalf of the EuroGentest Network, eighteen experts in PGD and/or molecular diagnosis of CF from seven countries attended a workshop held in Montpellier, France, on 14 December 2011. Building on the best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD established by ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology), the goal of this meeting was to formulate specific guidelines for CF-PGD in order to contribute to a better harmonization of practices across Europe. Different topics were covered including variant nomenclature, inclusion criteria, genetic counseling, PGD strategy and reporting of results. The recommendations are summarized here, and updated information on the clinical significance of CFTR variants and associated phenotypes is presented.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 27 May 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.99.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
83 In several countries, when at least one Table 1 (Continued ) HGVS nomenclature Legacy name cDNA nucleotide name Protein name 3121-1G4A c.2989-1G4A 3199del6 (3195del6) c.3067_3072delATAGTG p.Ile1023_Val1024del 3272-26 A4G c.3140-26 A4G L1065P c.3194 T4C p.Leu1065Pro R1066C c.3196C4T p.Arg1066Cys R1066H c.3197G4A p.Arg1066His L1077P c.3230 T4C p.Leu1077Pro W1089X c.3266G4A p.Trp1089* Y1092X c.3276C4A p.Tyr1092* E1104X c.3310G4T p.Glu1104* R1158X c.3472C4T p.Arg1158* S1196X c.3587C4G p.Ser1196* W1204X(3743G4A) c.3611G4A p.Trp1204* W1204X(3744G4A) c.3612G4A p.Trp1204* 3791delC c.3659delC p.Thr1220Lysfs*8 3849+10kbC4T c.3718-2477C4T p.(?) Login to comment

[hide] Prevalence of meconium ileus marks the severity of... Genet Med. 2015 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.79. Dupuis A, Keenan K, Ooi CY, Dorfman R, Sontag MK, Naehrlich L, Castellani C, Strug LJ, Rommens JM, Gonska T
Prevalence of meconium ileus marks the severity of mutations of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene.
Genet Med. 2015 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.79., [PMID:26087176]

Abstract [show]
RATIONALE: Meconium ileus (MI) is a perinatal complication in cystic fibrosis (CF), which is only minimally influenced by environmental factors. We derived and examined MI prevalence (MIP) scores to assess CFTR phenotype-phenotype correlation for severe mutations. METHOD: MIP scores were established using a Canadian CF population (n = 2,492) as estimates of the proportion of patients with MI among all patients carrying the same CFTR mutation, focusing on patients with p.F508del as the second allele. Comparisons were made to the registries from the US CF Foundation (n = 43,432), Italy (Veneto/Trentino/Alto Adige regions) (n = 1,788), and Germany (n = 3,596). RESULTS: The prevalence of MI varied among the different registries (13-21%). MI was predominantly prevalent in patients with pancreatic insufficiency carrying "severe" CFTR mutations. In this severe spectrum MIP scores further distinguished between mutation types, for example, G542X (0.31) with a high, F508del (0.22) with a moderate, and G551D (0.08) with a low MIP score. Higher MIP scores were associated with more severe clinical phenotypes, such as a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = 0.01) and body mass index z score (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: MIP scores can be used to rank CFTR mutations according to their clinical severity and provide a means to expand delineation of CF phenotypes.Genet Med advance online publication 18 June 2015Genetics in Medicine (2015); doi:10.1038/gim.2015.79.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
63 Canadian studies for CF modfier genes 2,492 3,153 43,432 3,596 1,788 2,230 23,397 16,023 3 716 3,438 860 15% (19%) 1,902 2,576 PIP and MIP derivation FEV1 and zBMI modeling MIP calculation following correction of MI variable 23,301 2,413 510 21% (25%) 20% (23%) 13% (15%) Total F508del/others MI prevalence uncorrected (estimated) Missing or incomplete genotype Available for analysis Canadian CF patient registry, born after 1980 US CF patient registry German CF patient registry CF patient registry, North Italy Table 1ߒ Meconium ileus prevalence scores for the most common cystic fibrosis-causing variants p. F508del/other variants Class PIP Canada, (n) MIP, (n) Canada United States Germany Italy HGVS Legacy name c.262_263delTT 394delTT I 0.38 (50) c.3472C>T R1158X I 0.37 (35) c.1558G>T V520F 0.35 (43) c.3484C>T R1162X I 0.34 (135) 0.17 (14) 0.22 (45) c.2012delT 2143delT I 0.33 (13) c.3276C>A or G Y1092X I 0.92 (13) 0.09 (12) 0.33 (55) c.3846G>A W1282X I 1.00 (13) 0.29 (13) 0.32 (442) 0.17 (20) c.1477C>T Q493X I 1.00 (11) 0.19 (11) 0.32 (102) c.3528delC 3659delC I 0.31 (139) c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T 711ߙ+ߙ1G>T 0.97 (39) 0.30 (38) 0.31 (54) c.178G>T E60X I 0.30 (66) c.1657C>T R553X I 1.00 (16) 0.28 (16) 0.30 (415) 0.24 (107) c.1585-1G>A 1717-1G>A I 1.00 (12) 0.23 (12) 0.29 (367) 0.22 (38) 0.16 (22) c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A 1898ߙ+ߙ1G>A 0.29 (139) c.1624G>T G542X I 0.99 (73) 0.31 (72) 0.29 (976) 0.21 (79) 0.22 (33) c.1521_1523delCTT F508del II 0.99 (1292) 0.22 (1260) 0.27 (15391) 0.21 (1910) 0.20 (230) c.1679G>C R560T II 0.27 (123) c.3744delA 3876delA 0.27 (22) c.2128A>T K710X I 0.26 (12) c.1519_1521delATC I507del II 1.00 (20) 0.21 (19) 0.25 (162) c.3909C>G N1303K II 0.98 (40) 0.13 (39) 0.25 (534) 0.23 (80) 0.14 (62) c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T 621ߙ+ߙ1G>T I 1.00 (90) 0.24 (88) 0.25 (369) 0.21 (11) c.3266G>A W1089X I 0.25 (17) c.1675G>A A559T 0.24 (21) c.988G>T G330X 0.24 (10) c.3773_3774insT 3905insT 0.23 (78) c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A 3120ߙ+ߙ1G>A 0.22 (121) c.443T>C I148T;3199del6 1.00 (15) 0.22 (15) c.2052delA 2184delA I 0.21 (89) 0.22 (10) c.2051_2052delAAinsG 2183AA>G 0.20 (73) 0.20 (42) c.948delT 1078delT 0.19 (20) c.1652G>A G551D III 0.96 (54) 0.08 (53) 0.15 (979) 0.09 (84) c.254G>A G85E 0.50 (24) 0.06 (24) 0.14 (137) 0.00 (10) c.3196C>T R1066C 0.14 (42) c.1466C>A S489X 1.00 (14) 0.14 (14) c.3808G>A D1270N 0.13 (19) c.1055G>A R352Q 0.12 (18) c.579ߙ+ߙ5G>A 711ߙ+ߙ5G>A 0.12 (30) c.2175_2176insA 2307insA 0.11 (24) c.349C>T R117C 0.10 (37) c.1040G>C R347P IV 0.18 (11) 0.19 (11) 0.10 (130) 0.02 (56) c.350G>A R117H IV 0.05 (21) 0.00 (21) 0.07 (666) 0.02 (19) c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A 2789ߙ+ߙ5G>A V 0.25 (20) 0.00 (20) 0.06 (271) 0.01 (21) c.1040G>A R347H 0.06 (55) c.2988G>A 3120G->A 0.06 (36) c.328G>C D1152H IV 0.06 (124) c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T 3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC>T V 0.07 (14) 0.00 (14) 0.05 (299) 0.01 (42) 0.00 (15) c.1364C>A A455E V 0.16 (45) 0.01 (41) 0.05 (109) c.1000C>T R334W IV 0.18 (11) 0.00 (10) 0.05 (92) c.617T>G L206W 0.06 (18) 0.05 (17) 0.04 (52) c.3302T>A M1101K 0.04 (17) c.200C>T P67L V 0.07 (14) 0.00 (14) Meconium ileus prevalence (MIP) and pancreas insufficiency prevalence (PIP) scores are presented. Login to comment

[hide] The impact of a national population carrier screen... J Cyst Fibros. 2015 Sep 16. pii: S1569-1993(15)00203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.08.007. Stafler P, Mei-Zahav M, Wilschanski M, Mussaffi H, Efrati O, Lavie M, Shoseyov D, Cohen-Cymberknoh M, Gur M, Bentur L, Livnat G, Aviram M, Alkrinawi S, Picard E, Prais D, Steuer G, Inbar O, Kerem E, Blau H
The impact of a national population carrier screening program on cystic fibrosis birth rate and age at diagnosis: Implications for newborn screening.
J Cyst Fibros. 2015 Sep 16. pii: S1569-1993(15)00203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.08.007., [PMID:26386752]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Population carrier screening (PCS) has been available in Israel since 1999 and universally subsidized since 2008. We sought to evaluate its impact. METHODS: A retrospective review of governmental databanks, the national CF registry and CF centers. RESULTS: CF rate per 100,000 live births has decreased from 14.5 in 1990 to 6 in 2011. From 2004-2011 there were 95 CF births: 22 utilized PCS; 68 (72%) had 2 known CFTR mutations; 37% were pancreatic sufficient. At diagnosis, age was 6 (0-98) months; 53/95 had respiratory symptoms, 41/95 failure to thrive and 19/95 pseudomonas. Thirty-four (36%) were Arabs and 19 (20%) orthodox Jews, compared to 20% and 8% respectively, in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: PCS markedly reduced CF birth rates with a shift towards milder mutations, but was often avoided for cultural reasons. As children regularly have significant disease at diagnosis, we suggest a balanced approach, utilizing both PCS and newborn screening.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
55 Mutation DF508 G542X W1282X N1303K 3849 + 10kbC- N T D1152H 405 + 1G࢐A G85E S549R W1089X 1717 + 1G࢐A I1234Va Y1092Xb 3121-1G N Ab 3120 + 1kbdel8.6 kbc 2183AA N Gc 4010delTATTc The first 14 mutations served as the panel used for Jewish population carrier screening program during the study period. Login to comment