ABCC7 p.Lys710*
ClinVar: |
c.2128A>T
,
p.Lys710*
D
, Pathogenic
|
CF databases: |
c.2128A>T
,
p.Lys710*
D
, CF-causing
|
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Two buffer PAGE system-based SSCP/HD analysis: a g... Eur J Hum Genet. 1999 Jul;7(5):590-8. Liechti-Gallati S, Schneider V, Neeser D, Kraemer R
Two buffer PAGE system-based SSCP/HD analysis: a general protocol for rapid and sensitive mutation screening in cystic fibrosis and any other human genetic disease.
Eur J Hum Genet. 1999 Jul;7(5):590-8., [PMID:10439967]
Abstract [show]
The large size of many disease genes and the multiplicity of mutations complicate the design of an adequate assay for the identification of disease-causing variants. One of the most successful methods for mutation detection is the single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique. By varying temperature, gel composition, ionic strength and additives, we optimised the sensitivity of SSCP for all 27 exons of the CFTR gene. Using simultaneously SSCP and heteroduplex (HD) analysis, a total of 80 known CF mutations (28 missense, 22 frameshift, 17 nonsense, 13 splicesite) and 20 polymorphisms was analysed resulting in a detection rate of 97.5% including the 24 most common mutations worldwide. The ability of this technique to detect mutations independent of their nature, frequency, and population specificity was confirmed by the identification of five novel mutations (420del9, 1199delG, R560S, A613T, T1299I) in Swiss CF patients, as well as by the detection of 41 different mutations in 198 patients experimentally analysed. We present a three-stage screening strategy allowing analysis of seven exons within 5 hours and analysis of the entire coding region within 1 week, including sequence analysis of the variants. Additionally, our protocol represents a general model for point mutation analysis in other genetic disorders and has already been successfully established for OTC deficiency, collagene deficiency, X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM), Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD, BMD), Wilson disease (WD), Neurofibromatosis I and II, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies, and defects in mitochondrial DNA. No other protocol published so far presents standard SSCP/HD conditions for mutation screening in different disease genes.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
20 The distribution of analysed known mutations is similar to that of the total number of mutations in the entire CFTR gene: missense mutations account for 35% (G27E, G85E, R117H, A120T, I148T, H199Y, R334W, T338I, R347P, R347H, A455E, M718K, S5449N, S5449I, G551D, R560T, R560S, S945L, S977P, I1005R, R1066C, R1070Q, M1101K, D1152H, S1235R, R1283M, N1303K, N1303H), followed by 28% of frameshift mutations (175delC, 394delTT, 457TAT- > G, 905delG, 1078delT, I507, F508, 1609delCA, 1677delTA, 2143delT, 2176insC, 218delA, 2184insA, 2869insG, 3659delC, 3732delA, 3821delT, 3905insT, 4016insT, 4172delGC, 4382delA), 21% of nonsense mutations (Q30X, Q39X, Q220X, W401X, Q525X, G542X, Q552X, R553X, V569X, E585X, K710X, R792X, Y1092X, R1162X, S1255X, W1282X, E1371X), and 16% of splice site mutations (621 + 1G- > T, 711 + 1G- > T, 711 + 5G- > A, 1717-1G- > A, 1898 + 1G- > A, 1898 + 5G- > T, 2789 + 5G- > A, 3271 + 1G- > A, 3272-26A- > G, 3601-17T- > C, 3849 + 4A- > G, 3849 + 10kbC- > T, 4374 + 1G- > T).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 10439967:20:706
status: NEW92 The technique developed demonstrates excellent single-strand separation and non-radioactive visualisation on polyacrylamide gels, and is time-saving and directly Table 2 Known mutations identified in 198 CF patients analysed investigatively Exon (E) Number of CFTR mutations intron (I) chromosomes Patient`s nationality Highest prevalence ∆F508 E10 212 miscellaneous 3905insT E20 025 Swiss Swiss, Amish, Arcadian R553X E11 020 Swiss, German German 1717-1G->A I10 017 Swiss, Italian Italian N1303K E21 011 Swiss, French, Italian Italian W1282X E20 014 Swiss, Italian, Israelit Jewish-Askhenazi G542X E11 009 Swiss, Spanish, Italian Spanish 2347delG E13 008 Swiss R1162X E19 006 Swiss, Italian, Russian Italian 3849+10kbC->T I19 005 German, French R347P E07 004 Swiss T5 I08 004 Swiss R334W E07 003 Swiss Q525X E10 003 Swiss 3732delA E19 003 Swiss S1235R E19 003 Italian, Turkish G85E E03 002 Italian, Greek I148T E04 002 Austrian, Turkish French-Canadian 621+1G->T I04 002 French French-Canadian 1078delT E07 002 Swiss E585X E12 002 Italian 2176insC E13 002 Swiss, Italian 2789+5G->A I14b 002 Italian Spanish D1152H E18 002 Swiss, French 4016insT E21 002 Turkish Q39X E02 001 Swiss 394delTT E03 001 Swiss Nordic, Finnish R117H E04 001 Swiss A120T E04 001 Swiss G126D E04 001 Swiss 711+5G->A I05 001 Russian M348K E07 001 Italian L568F E12 001 Italian 2183AA->G E13 001 Italian Italian K710X E13 001 Swiss S945L E15 001 French 3272-26A.->G I17a 001 Swiss M1101K E17b 001 Swiss Huttite 3601-17C->T I18 001 Swiss R1158X E19 001 Swiss 4005+1G-A I20 001 Italian applicable to early diagnostic testing, carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 10439967:92:1391
status: NEW[hide] Lung disease associated with the IVS8 5T allele of... Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;162(5):1919-24. Noone PG, Pue CA, Zhou Z, Friedman KJ, Wakeling EL, Ganeshananthan M, Simon RH, Silverman LM, Knowles MR
Lung disease associated with the IVS8 5T allele of the CFTR gene.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;162(5):1919-24., [PMID:11069835]
Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene. The 5T allele in intron 8 (IVS8) causes abnormal splicing in the CFTR gene, and is associated with lung disease when it occurs in cis with a missense mutation in the CFTR gene, R117H. However, the 5T variant alone has not been reported to cause lung disease. We describe two adult female patients with CF-like lung disease associated with the 5T allele. One patient's genotype is 5T-TG12-M470V/5T-TG12-M470V, and the other is DeltaF508/5T-TG12-M470V; full sequencing of the CFTR gene revealed no other mutation on the same allele as the 5T variant. The levels of full-length CFTR mRNA in respiratory epithelia were very low in these patients (11 and 6%, respectively, of total CFTR mRNA expression). Both patients had defective CFTR-mediated chloride conductance in the sweat ductal and/or acinar epithelia (sweat chloride, mmol/L, mean +/- SEM: 40.0 +/- 5.0 [n = 8 samples] and 80. 0 +/- 3.5 [n = 6 samples]) and airway epithelia (mV, mean +/- SEM CFTR-mediated Cl(-) conductance of 1.2 +/- 2.2 [n = 5 studies] and -6.75 +/- 8.1 [n = 4 studies]). These data suggest that the 5T polythymidine tract sequence on specific haplotype backgrounds (TG12 and M470V) may cause a low level of full-length functional CFTR protein and CF-like lung disease.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
136 Three other (younger) patients were compound heterozygotes for E858X/5T and K710X/5T, with episodes of dehydration and abnormal sweat chlorides, but no other clinical features of CF.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 11069835:136:76
status: NEW[hide] High morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis pa... Eur Respir J. 2001 Jun;17(6):1181-6. Schibler A, Bolt I, Gallati S, Schoni MH, Kraemer R
High morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis patients compound heterozygous for 3905insT and deltaF508.
Eur Respir J. 2001 Jun;17(6):1181-6., [PMID:11491162]
Abstract [show]
Genotype-phenotype association in cystic fibrosis (CF) is difficult because of heterogeneous disease expression. The genotype-phenotype correlation for the 3905insT mutation in comparison to deltaF508 was studied here. Thirty CF patients compound heterozygous for 3905insT were compared to clinical presentation of matched patients homozygous for deltaF508 (1960-1997). Sweat tests, age at diagnosis, at death and at onset of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization were analysed. Chrispin-Norman scores and pulmonary function forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) determined severity of lung disease. Twenty-five of the patients with 3905insT had deltaF508 as a second mutation and five had another rare mutation. At the age of 15 yrs, 60% of patients with 3905insT had an FEV1 < 60% predicted in comparison to 25% of patients with deltaF508 (p<0.05). Age at death and cumulative survival rate was significantly lower (p<0.05) in the 3905insT than in the deltaF508 group (20.3 and 24.0 yrs, respectively). Age at onset of P. aeruginosa colonization was not different in the study groups. Sweat chloride concentrations were lower in patients homozygous for deltaF508 (105.63+/-15.3 mmol L(-1)) than in patients with 3905insT (119.9+/-22.1 mmol x L(-1)) (p<0.05). Patients compound heterozygous for 3905insT have similar high morbidity and mortality to patients homozygous for deltaF508.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
46 R553X and K710X are nonsense mutations in exon 11 and 13, respectively, whereas R347P is a missense mutation in exon 7.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 11491162:46:10
status: NEW141 The other four patients with compound heterozygosity for 3905insT and 1717-1GRA, R553X and K710X, respectively, did not show a different clinical course from patients with 3905insT/DF508.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 11491162:141:91
status: NEW[hide] Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR muta... Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM
Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606., [PMID:12007216]
Abstract [show]
Although there have been numerous reports from around the world of mutations in the gene of chromosome 7 known as CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), little attention has been given to integrating these mutant alleles into a global understanding of the population molecular genetics associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). We determined the distribution of CFTR mutations in as many regions throughout the world as possible in an effort designed to: 1) increase our understanding of ancestry-genotype relationships, 2) compare mutational arrays with disease incidence, and 3) gain insight for decisions regarding screening program enhancement through CFTR multi-mutational analyses. Information on all mutations that have been published since the identification and cloning of the CFTR gene's most common allele, DeltaF508 (or F508del), was reviewed and integrated into a centralized database. The data were then sorted and regional CFTR arrays were determined using mutations that appeared in a given region with a frequency of 0.5% or greater. Final analyses were based on 72,431 CF chromosomes, using data compiled from over 100 original papers, and over 80 regions from around the world, including all nations where CF has been studied using analytical molecular genetics. Initial results confirmed wide mutational heterogeneity throughout the world; however, characterization of the most common mutations across most populations was possible. We also examined CF incidence, DeltaF508 frequency, and regional mutational heterogeneity in a subset of populations. Data for these analyses were filtered for reliability and methodological strength before being incorporated into the final analysis. Statistical assessment of these variables revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between DeltaF508 frequency and the CF incidence levels of regional populations. Regional analyses were also performed to search for trends in the distribution of CFTR mutations across migrant and related populations; this led to clarification of ancestry-genotype patterns that can be used to design CFTR multi-mutation panels for CF screening programs. From comprehensive assessment of these data, we offer recommendations that multiple CFTR alleles should eventually be included to increase the sensitivity of newborn screening programs employing two-tier testing with trypsinogen and DNA analysis.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
109 Mutational Arrays, Detection Rates and Methods by Region* Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference Europe Albania ∆F508 (72.4%) C276X (0.7%) 74.5 55.5 4 270/146 CFGAC [1994]; Macek et al. G85E (0.7%) R1070Q (0.7%) [2002] Austria ∆F508 (62.9%) 457TAT→G (1.2%) 76.6 58.7 11 1516/580 Estiville et al. [1997]; Dörk et al. (total) G542X (3.3%) 2183AA→G (0.7%) [2000]; Macek et al. [2002] CFTRdele2,3 (2.1%) N1303K (0.6%) R1162X (1.9%) I148T (0.5%) R553X (1.7%) R117H (0.5%) G551D (1.2%) Austria ∆F508 (74.6%) 2183AA→G (2.4%) 95.3 90.8 8 126 Stuhrmann et al. [1997] (tyrol) R1162X (8.7%) G551D (1.6%) G542X (2.4%) R347P (1.6%) 2789+5G→A (2.4%) Q39X (1.6%) Belarus ∆F508 (61.2%) R553X (0.5%) 75.2 56.6 9 278/188 Dörk et al. [2000]; Macek et al. G542X (4.5%) R334W (0.5%) [2002] CFTRdele2,3 (3.3%) R347P (0.5%) N1303K (3.2%) S549N (0.5%) W1282X (1.0%) Belgium ∆F508 (75.1%) 622-1A→C (0.5%) 100.0 100.0 27 1504/522 Cuppens et al. [1993]; Mercier et G542X (3.5%) G458V (0.5%) al. [1993]; CFGAC [1994]; N1303K (2.7%) 1898+G→C (0.5%) Estivill et al.[1997] R553X (1.7%) G970R (0.5%) 1717-1G→A (1.6%) 4218insT (0.5%) E60X (1.6%) 394delTT (0.5%) W1282X (1.4%) K830X (0.5%) 2183A→G+2184delA (1.2%) E822K (0.5%) W401X (1.0%) 3272-1G→A (0.5%) A455E (1.0%) S1161R (0.5%) 3272-26A→G (1.0%) R1162X (0.5%) S1251N (1.0%) 3750delAG (0.5%) S1235R (0.8%) S1255P (0.5%) ∆I507 (0.6%) Bulgaria ∆F508 (63.6%) R75Q (1.0%) 93.0 86.5 21 948/432 Angelicheva et al. [1997]; (total) N1303K (5.6%) 2183AA→G (0.9%) Estivill et al. [1997]; Macek G542X (3.9%) G1244V+S912L (0.9%) et al. [2002] R347P (2.2%) G85E (0.9%) 1677delTA (2.1%) 2184insA (0.9%) R1070Q (1.8%) L88X+G1069R (0.8%) Q220X (1.2%) 2789+5G→A (0.8%) 3849+10KbC→T (1.1%) G1244E (0.8%) W1282X (1.0%) 1717-1G→A (0.8%) 2176insC (1.0%) Y919C (0.7%) G1069R (1.0%) WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS581 Bulgaria 1) DF508 4) 1677delTA - - 6 13 Angelicheva et al. [1997] (ethnic 2) R347P 5) Q493R Turks) 3) G542X 6) L571S - - 1 30 Angelicheva et al. [1997] Bulgaria 1) DF508 (100.0%) (Gypsy) Croatia ∆F508 (64.5%) G551D (1.1%) 72.5 52.6 5 276 Macek et al. [2002] G542X (3.3%) 3849+10KbC→T (0.7%) N1303K (2.9%) Czech ∆F508 (70.0%) 1898+1G→T (2.0%) 89.6 80.3 10 2196/628 CFGAC [1994]; Estiville et al. Republic CFTRdele2,3 (5.5%) 2143delT (1.2%) [1997]; Dörk et al. [2000]; G551D (3.8%) R347P (0.8%) Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (2.9%) 3849+10KbC→T (0.6%) G542X (2.2%) W1282X (0.6%) Denmark ∆F508 (87.5%) G542X (0.7%) 92.3 85.2 6 1888/678 CFGAC [1994]; Schwartz et al. (excluding 394delTT (1.8%) 621+1G→T (0.6%) [1994]; Estiville et al. [1997] Faroe) N1303K (1.1%) 3659delC (0.6%) Estonia ∆F508 (51.7%) R117C (1.7%) 80.2 64.3 10 165/80 Estivill et al. [1997]; Klaassen et 394delTT (13.3%) E217G (1.7%) al. [1998]; Macek et al. S1235R (3.3%) R1066H (1.7%) [2002] 359insT (1.7%) 3659delC (1.7%) I1005R (1.7%) S1169X (1.7%) Finland ∆F508 (46.2%) G542X (1.9%) 78.8 62.1 4 132/52 CFGAC [1994]; Kere et al. 394delTT (28.8%) 3372delA (1.9%) [1994]; Estivill et al. [1997] France ∆F508 (67.7%) 2789+5G→T (0.79%) 79.7 63.6 12 17854/7420 Chevalier-Porst et al. [1994]; (total) G542X (2.94%) 2184delA+2183A→G (0.77%) Estivill et al. [1997]; Claustres et al. [2000]; Guilloud-Bataille N1303K (1.83%) G551D (0.74%) et al. [2000] 1717-1G→A (1.35%) 1078delT (0.63%) W1282X (0.91%) ∆I507 (0.62%) R553X (0.86%) Y122K (0.59%) France ∆F508 (75.8%) R297Q (0.8%) 98.7 97.4 18 599/365 Férec et al. [1992]; Scotet et al. (Brittany) 1078delT (4.0%) R347H (0.8%) [2000] G551D (3.6%) I1234V (0.8%) N1303K (3.0%) R553X (0.8%) R117H (1.7%) 2789+5G→A (0.8%) 3272-26A→G (1.3%) 4005+1G→A (0.7%) G542X (1.1%) 621+1G→T (0.6%) 1717-1G→A (1.0%) ∆I507 (0.6%) G1249R (0.8%) W846X (0.5%) France ∆F508 (70.0%) N1303K (0.8%) 90.4 81.7 16 250 Claustres et al. [1993] (southern) G542X (6.4%) 3737delA (0.8%) 1717-1G→A (1.6%) R1162X (0.8%) L206W (1.2%) Y1092X (0.8%) R334W (1.2%) S945L (0.8%) ∆I507 (1.2%) K710X (0.8%) 2184delA (1.2%) 1078delT (0.8%) R1158X (1.2%) Y122X (0.8%) (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 12007216:109:4343
status: NEW111 Slovakia ∆F508 (57.3%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.2%) 82.7 68.4 14 908/254 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. G542X (6.8%) 3849+10KbC→T (1.0%) [1997]; Dörk et al. [2000]; R553X (4.0%) S42F (0.9%) Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (3.4%) R75X (0.9%) 2143delT (1.8%) G85E (0.9%) R347P (1.4%) 605insT (0.9%) W1282X (1.3%) 1898+1G→A (0.9%) Slovenia ∆F508 (57.8%) R347P (1.1%) 79.7 63.5 16 455/132 CFGAC [1994]; Dörk et al. 2789+5G→A (4.1%) S4X (0.8%) [2000]; Macek et al. [2002] R1162X (3.2%) 457TAT→G (0.8%) G542X (1.9%) D192G (0.8%) Q552X (1.5%) R553X (0.8%) Q685X (1.5%) A559T (0.8%) 3905insT (1.5%) 2907delTT (0.8%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.5%) 3667ins4 (0.8%) Spain ∆F508 (52.7%) G85E (0.8%) 80.2 64.3 21 3608/1356 Chillón et al. [1994]; Casals et G542X (8.0%) R1066C (0.8%) al. [1997]; Estivill et al. [1997] N1303K (2.5%) 2789+5G→A (0.7%) 3601-111G→C (2.0%) 2869insG (0.7%) 1811+1.6Kb A→G (1.7%) ∆I507 (0.6%) R1162X (1.6%) W1282X (0.6%) 711+1G→T (1.3%) L206W (0.5%) R334W (1.2%) R709X (0.5%) Q890X (1.0%) K710X (0.5%) 1609delCA (1.0%) 3272-26A→G (0.5%) 712-1G→T (1.0%) Sweden ∆F508 (66.6%) E60X (0.6%) 85.9 73.8 10 1357/662 Schwartz et al. [1994]; Estivill et 394delTT (7.3%) Y109C (0.6%) al. [1997]; Schaedel et al. 3659delC (5.4%) R117H (0.6%) [1999] 175insT (2.4%) R117C (0.6%) T338I (1.2%) G542X (0.6%) Switzerland ∆F508 (57.2%) K1200E (2.1%) 91.3 83.4 9 1268/1173 Estivill et al. [1997]; R553X (14.0%) N1303K (1.2%) Hergersberg et al. [1997] 3905insT (9.8%) W1282X (1.1%) 1717-1G→A (2.7%) R347P (0.6%) G542X (2.6%) Ukraine ∆F508 (65.2%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.1%) 74.6 55.7 6 1055/580 Estivill et al. [1997]; Dörk et al. R553X (3.6%) G551D (1.8%) [2000]; Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (2.4%) W1282X (0.5%) United ∆F508 (75.3%) 621+1G→T (0.93%) 81.6 66.6 5 19622/9815 Schwartz et al. [1995b]; Kingdom G551D (3.1%) 1717-1G→A (0.57%) Estivill et al. [1997] (total) G542X (1.7%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS585 United ∆F508 (56.6%) 621+1G→T (1.8%) 69.1 47.7 7 456 CFGAC [1994] Kingdom G551D (3.7%) R117H (1.5%) (N. Ireland) R560T (2.6%) ∆I507 (0.9%) G542X (2.0%) United ∆F508 (19.2%) 621+2T→C (3.8%) 84.4 71.2 11 52 Malone et al. [1998] Kingdom Y569D (15.4%) 2184insA (3.8%) (Pakistani) Q98X (11.5%) R560S (1.9%) 1525-1G→A (9.6%) 1898+1G→T (1.9%) 296+12T→C (7.7%) R709X (1.9%) 1161delC (7.7%) United ∆F508 (71.3%) 1717-1G→A (1.0%) 86.4 74.6 9 1236/730 Shrimpton et al. [1991]; Kingdom G551D (5.5%) 621+1G→T (0.6%) Gilfillan et al. [1998] (Scotland) G542X (4.0%) ∆I507 (0.6%) R117H (1.4%) R560T (0.6%) P67L (1.4%) United ∆F508 (71.6%) 1717-1G→A (1.1%) 98.7 97.4 17 183 Cheadle et al. [1993] Kingdom 621+1G→T (6.6%) 3659delC (0.5%) (Wales) 1898+1G→A (5.5%) R117H (0.5%) G542X (2.2%) N1303K (0.5%) G551D (2.2%) E60X (0.5%) 1078delT (2.2%) S549N (0.5%) R1283M (1.6%) 3849+10KbC→T (0.5%) R553X (1.1%) 4016insT (0.5%) ∆I507 (1.1%) Yugoslavia ∆F508 (68.9%) 3849G→A (1.0%) 82.2 67.6 11 709/398 Dabovic et al. [1992]; Estivill et G542X (4.0%) N1303K (0.8%) al. [1997]; Macek et al. R1162C (3.0%) 525delT (0.5%) (submitted for publication) 457TAT→G (1.0%) 621+1G→T (0.5%) I148T (1.0%) G551D (0.5%) Q552X (1.0%) Middle East/Africa Algeria 1) DF508 (20.0%) 4) 1812-1G®A (5.0%) - - 5 20 Loumi et al. [1999] 2) N1303K (20.0%) 5) V754M (5.0%) 3) 711+1G®T (10.0%) Jewish W1282X (48.0%) 3849+10KbC→T (6.0%) 95.0 90.3 6 261 Kerem et al. [1995] (Ashkenazi) ∆F508 (28.0%) N1303K (3.0%) G542X (9.0%) 1717-1G→A (1.0%) Jewish 1) N1303K - - 1 6 Kerem et al. [1995] (Egypt) Jewish 1) Q359K/T360K - - 1 8 Kerem et al. [1995] (Georgia) Jewish 1) DF508 2) 405+1G®A - - 2 11 Kerem et al. [1995] (Libya) Jewish 1) DF508 (72.0%) 3) D1152H (6.0%) - - 3 33 Kerem et al. [1995] (Morocco) 2) S549R (6.0%) Jewish ∆F508 (35.0%) W1282X (2.0%) 43.0 18.5 4 51 Shoshani et al. [1992] (Sepharadim) G542X (4.0%) S549I (2.0%) (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 12007216:111:1073
status: NEW[hide] Analysis by mass spectrometry of 100 cystic fibros... Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2066-72. Wang Z, Milunsky J, Yamin M, Maher T, Oates R, Milunsky A
Analysis by mass spectrometry of 100 cystic fibrosis gene mutations in 92 patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens.
Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2066-72., [PMID:12151438]
Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Limited mutation analysis for congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) has revealed only a minority of men in whom two distinct mutations were detected. We aimed to determine whether a more extensive mutation analysis would be of benefit in genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 92 men with CBAVD using mass spectrometry and primer oligonucleotide base extension to analyse an approximately hierarchical set of the most common 100 CF mutations. RESULTS: Analysis of 100 CF mutations identified 33/92 (35.9%) patients with two mutations and 29/92 (31.5%) with one mutation, compound heterozygosity accounting for 94% (31/33) of those with two mutations. This panel detected 12.0% more CBAVD men with at least one mutation and identified a second mutation in >50% of those considered to be heterozygotes under the two routine 25 mutation panel analyses. CONCLUSION: Compound heterozygosity of severe/mild mutations accounted for the vast majority of the CBAVD patients with two mutations, and underscores the value of a more extensive CF mutation panel for men with CBAVD. The CF100 panel enables higher carrier detection rates especially for men with CBAVD, their partners, partners of known CF carriers, and those with 'mild' CF with rarer mutations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
20 Given the frequency of CF mutations, especially in the Caucasian population ( in 25), and the common request by CBAVD men to sire their own offspring by using surgical Table I. The 100 most common cystic fibrosis mutations listed by exon Mutationa Exonb Frequency (%)c G85E 3 0.1 394delTT 3 Swedish E60X 3 Belgium R75X 3 405ϩ1G→A Int 3 R117H 4 0.30 Y122X 4 French 457TAT→G 4 Austria I148T 4 Canada (French Canadian) 574delA 4 444delA 4 R117L 4 621ϩ1G→T Int 4 0.72 711ϩ1G→T Int 5 Ͼ0.1 712-1G→T Int 5 711ϩ5G→A Int 5 Italy (Caucasian) L206W 6a R347P 7 0.24 1078delT 7 Ͼ0.1 R334W 7 Ͼ0.1 1154InsTC 7 T338I 7 Italy R347H 7 Turkey Q359K/T360K 7 Israel (Georgian Jews) I336K 7 R352Q 7 G330X 7 S364P 7 A455E 9 0.20 I507 10 0.21 F508 10 66.02 1609delCA 10 Spain (Caucasian) V520F 10 Q493X 10 C524X 10 G480C 10 Q493R 10 1717-1G→A Int 10 0.58 R553X 11 0.73 G551D 11 1.64 G542X 11 2.42 R560T 11 Ͼ0.1 S549N 11 Q552X 11 Italy S549I 11 Israel (Arabs) A559T 11 African American R553G 11 R560K 11 1812-1G→A Int 11 A561E 12 E585X 12 Y563D 12 Y563N 12 1898ϩ1G→A Int 12 0.22 1898ϩ1G→C Int 12 2183AA→G 13 Italian 2184delA 13 Ͻ0.1 K710X 13 2143delT 13 Moscow (Russian) 2184InsA 13 1949del84 13 Spain (Spanish) 2176InsC 13 2043delG 13 2307insA 13 2789ϩ5G→A Int 14b Ͼ0.1 2869insG 15 S945L 15 Q890X 15 3120G→A 16 2067 Table I. continued Mutationa Exonb Frequency (%)c 3120ϩ1G→A Int 16 African American 3272-26A→G Int 17a R1066C 17b Portugal (Portugese) L1077P 17b R1070Q 17b Bulgarian W1089X 17b M1101K 17b Canada (Hutterite) R1070P 17b R1162X 19 0.29 3659delC 19 Ͼ0.1 3849G→A 19 3662delA 19 3791delC 19 3821delT 19 Russian Q1238X 19 S1235R 19 France, South S1196X 19 K1177R 19 3849ϩ10kbC→T Int 19 0.24 3849ϩ4A→G Int 19 W1282X 20 1.22 S1251N 20 Dutch, Belgian 3905insT 20 Swiss, Acadian, Amish G1244E 20 R1283M 20 Welsh W1282R 20 D1270N 20 S1255X 20 African American 4005ϩ1G→A Int 20 N1303K 21 1.34 W1316X 21 aMutations were chosen according to their frequencies (Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium, 1994; Zielenski and Tsui, 1995; Estivill et al., 1997).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 12151438:20:1253
status: NEW[hide] High allelic heterogeneity between Afro-Brazilians... Genet Test. 2003 Fall;7(3):213-8. Raskin S, Pereira L, Reis F, Rosario NA, Ludwig N, Valentim L, Phillips JA 3rd, Allito B, Heim RA, Sugarman EA, Probst CM, Faucz F, Culpi L
High allelic heterogeneity between Afro-Brazilians and Euro-Brazilians impacts cystic fibrosis genetic testing.
Genet Test. 2003 Fall;7(3):213-8., [PMID:14641997]
Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by at least 1,000 different mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR). To determine the frequency of 70 common worldwide CFTR mutations in 155 Euro-Brazilian CF patients and in 38 Afro-Brazilian CF patients, we used direct PCR amplification of DNA from a total of 386 chromosomes from CF patients born in three different states of Brazil. The results show that screening for seventy mutations accounts for 81% of the CF alleles in Euro-Brazilians, but only 21% in the Afro-Brazilian group. We found 21 different mutations in Euro-Brazilians and only 7 mutations in Afro-Brazilians. The frequency of mutations and the number of different mutations detected in Euro-Brazilians are different from Northern European and North American populations, but similar to Southern European populations; in Afro-Brazilians, the mix of CF-mutations is different from those reported in Afro-American CF patients. We also found significant differences in detection rates between Euro-Brazilian (75%) and Afro-Brazilian CF patients (21%) living in the same state, Minas Gerais. These results, therefore, have implications for the use of DNA-based tests for risk assessment in heterogeneous populations like the Brazilians. Further studies are needed to identify the remaining CF mutations in the different populations and regions of Brazil.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
63 FREQUENCIES OF 70 CFTR MUTATIONS IN DIFFERENT STATES OF BRAZIL, BY CONTINENTA L GROUP CFTR mutations SC PR MG detected n n n n % n % N % DF508 53 39 54 146 47.1 8 10.5 154 39.9 G542X 6 9 8 23 7.4 1 1.3 24 6.2 R1162X 9 2 4 15 4.8 2 2.6 17 4.4 N1303K 5 5 0 10 3.2 0 0 10 2.6 R334W 5 1 4 10 3.2 0 0 10 2.6 G85E 2 2 4 8 2.6 1 1.3 9 2.3 1717-1G®A 1 3 2 6 1.9 0 0 6 1.6 W1282X 4 1 1 6 1.9 0 0 6 1.6 3849110kbC®T 1 3 1 5 1.6 0 0 5 1.3 R553X 0 2 0 2 0.7 0 0 2 0.5 1812-1G®A 0 1 3 4 1.3 1 1.3 5 1.3 2183AA®G 2 1 0 3 1.0 0 0 3 0.8 312011G®A 0 0 2 2 0.7 2 2.6 4 1.0 Y1092X 0 1 1 2 0.7 1 1.3 3 0.8 G551D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W1089X 0 0 1 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 6211G®T 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 Q1238X 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 711-1G®T 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 R347P 1 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 189811G®A 1 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 I507 0 0 1 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 Subtotal 91 73 86 250 80.7 16 21.1 266 68.9 Alleles with CFTR 5 27 28 60 19.4 60 79.0 120 31.1 mutations not detected Total 96 100 114 310 100.0 76 100.0 386 100.0 Detection rate (%) 94.8 73.0 75.4 250 80.7 16 21.1 266 68.9 The following 70 CFTR mutations were selected and tested on the basis of frequency in various populations, known association with CF, or predicted deleterious effect on the CFTR protein product; DF508, G542X, N1303K, G551D, R553X, DI507, A455E, A559T, C524X, D1270N, E60X, G178R, G330X, G85E, 2307insA, I148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P 2307insA, I148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P 2307insA, 1148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P, R352Q, R560T, S1196X, S1255X, S364P, S549N, S549R, V520F, W1089X, W1282X, W1310X, W1316X, Y1092X, Y122X, Y563D, 1078delT,1677delTA,1717-1G-A,1812-1G-A,1898 1 1G-A, 2043delG,2183delAA-G, 2184delA, 2789 1 5G-A, 2869insG, 2909delT, 3120 1 1G-A, 3120G-A, 3358delAC, 3659delC, 3662delA, 3750delAG, 3791delC, 3821delT, 3849 1 10KbC-T, 3849 1 4A-G, 3905insT, 405 1 1G-A, 444delA, 556delA, 574delA, 621 1 1G-T, and 711 1 1G-T. aSC, Santa Catarina State; PR, Parana State; MG, Minas Gerais State; n, number of chromosomes.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 14641997:63:1390
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 14641997:63:1486
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 14641997:63:1582
status: NEW[hide] CFTR mutation distribution among U.S. Hispanic and... Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):392-9. Sugarman EA, Rohlfs EM, Silverman LM, Allitto BA
CFTR mutation distribution among U.S. Hispanic and African American individuals: evaluation in cystic fibrosis patient and carrier screening populations.
Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):392-9., [PMID:15371903]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We reviewed CFTR mutation distribution among Hispanic and African American individuals referred for CF carrier screening and compared mutation frequencies to those derived from CF patient samples. METHODS: Results from CFTR mutation analyses received from January 2001 through September 2003, were analyzed for four populations: Hispanic individuals with a CF diagnosis (n = 159) or carrier screening indication (n = 15,333) and African American individuals with a CF diagnosis (n = 108) or carrier screening indication (n = 8,973). All samples were tested for the same 87 mutation panel. RESULTS: In the Hispanic population, 42 mutations were identified: 30 in the patient population (77.5% detection rate) and 33 among carrier screening referrals. Five mutations not included in the ACMG/ACOG carrier screening panel (3876delA, W1089X, R1066C, S549N, 1949del84) accounted for 7.55% detection in patients and 5.58% among carriers. Among African American referrals, 33 different mutations were identified: 21 in the patient population (74.4% detection) and 23 in the carrier screening population. Together, A559T and 711+5G>A were observed at a detection rate of 3.71% in CF patients and 6.38% in carriers. The mutation distribution seen in both the carrier screening populations reflected an increased frequency of mutations with variable expression such as D1152H, R117H, and L206W. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed analysis of CFTR mutation distribution in the Hispanic and African American patient and carrier screening populations demonstrates that a diverse group of mutations is most appropriate for diagnostic and carrier screening in these populations. To best serve the increasingly diverse U.S. population, ethnic-specific mutations should be included in mutation panels.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
35 87 mutation panel The following mutations were included in the panel: ⌬F508, ⌬F311, ⌬I507, A455E, A559T, C524X, D1152H, D1270N, E60X, G178R, G330X, G480C, G542X, G551D, G85E, G91R, I148T, K710X, L206W, M1101K, N1303K, P574H, Q1238X, Q359K/T360K, Q493X, Q552X, Q890X, R1066C, R1158X, R1162X, R117C, R117H, R1283M, R334W, R347H, R347P, R352Q, R553X, R560T, S1196X, S1251N, S1255X, S364P, S549I, S549N, S549R, T338I, V520F, W1089X, W1282X, Y1092X, Y563D, 1078delT, 1161delC, 1609delCA, 1677delTA, 1717-1GϾA, 1812-1GϾA, 1898ϩ1GϾA, 1898ϩ5GϾT, 1949del84, 2043delG, 2143delT, 2183delAAϾG, 2184delA, 2307insA, 2789ϩ5GϾA, 2869insG, 3120ϩ1GϾA, 3120GϾA, 3659delC, 3662delA, 3791delC, 3821delT, 3849ϩ10kbCϾT, 3849ϩ4AϾG, 3905insT, 394delTT, 405ϩ1GϾA, 405ϩ3AϾC, 444delA, 574delA, 621ϩ1GϾT, 711ϩ1GϾT, 711ϩ5GϾA, 712-1GϾT, 3876delA CFTR mutation analysis Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes, buccal cell swabs, or bloodspots by Qiagen QIAmp 96 DNA Blood Kit. Specimens were tested for 87 mutations by a pooled allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridization method as previously described.16,17 Two multiplex chain reactions (PCR) were used to amplify 19 regions of the CFTR gene.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15371903:35:209
status: NEW[hide] Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in a 51-mutatio... Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):426-30. Buyse IM, McCarthy SE, Lurix P, Pace RP, Vo D, Bartlett GA, Schmitt ES, Ward PA, Oermann C, Eng CM, Roa BB
Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in a 51-mutation test for cystic fibrosis: evidence that 3199del6 is a disease-causing mutation.
Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):426-30., [PMID:15371908]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We developed a 51-mutation extended cystic fibrosis (CF) panel that incorporates the 25 previously recommended CFTR mutations, plus 26 additional mutations including 3199del6, which was associated with I148T. METHODS: This assay utilizes an integrated matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry system. RESULTS: CF testing was performed on over 5,000 individuals, including a 3-year-old Hispanic-American patient with a compound heterozygous G542X/3199del6 genotype. He is negative for I148T, or other mutations assessed by CFTR gene sequencing. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the successful implementation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in CF clinical testing, and establish 3199del6 as a disease-causing CF mutation.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
77 This assay also demonstrated heterozygosity for the G542X mutation, and reflex testing for the 5T variant at CFTR intron 8 showed a genotype of 7T/9T in this patient (data not Table 3 Description of the 16 multiplex assays designed to analyze 51 CFTR mutations Multiplex Mutations Exon 1 1078delT, G314E, R352Q, G330X 7 2 R347H, R347P, R334W, 1717-1A 7, 11 3 R553X, S549N, R1162X 11, 19 4 A559T, R560T, G551D 11 5 G542X, S549R, 621ϩ1T, Y122X 4, 11 6 W1282X, 3876delA, 3905insT, D1152H 18, 20 7 3849ϩ4G, 3659delC, 1898ϩ1A 12, 19 8 405ϩ1A, 405ϩ3C, 3120A, 3120ϩ1A 3, 16 9 394delTT, E60X, G85E 3 10 A455E, ⌬F508a 9, 10 11 G480C, Q493X, V520F 10 12 711ϩ1T, G178R, 3199del6 5, 17a 13 2143delT, 2184delA, K710X, F316L 7, 13 14 I148T, R117H, R117C 4 15 N1303K, 2789ϩ5A, 3849ϩ10kbT 14b, intron19, 21 16 ⌬I507a 10 17 5Tb intron 8 a F508C and I507V, I506V, I506M variants are tested for concurrently with the ⌬F508 and ⌬I507 assays respectively.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15371908:77:747
status: NEW[hide] Multimutational analysis of eleven cystic fibrosis... Clin Chem. 2004 Nov;50(11):2155-7. Farez-Vidal ME, Gomez-Llorente C, Blanco S, Morales P, Casals T, Gomez-Capilla JA
Multimutational analysis of eleven cystic fibrosis mutations common in the Mediterranean areas.
Clin Chem. 2004 Nov;50(11):2155-7., [PMID:15502086]
Abstract [show]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
51 Two multiplex reactions were designed for the analysis of 11 mutations: multiplex 1 (M1) analyzed K710X, R1066C/R1066S, 2869 insG, and Q890X polymorphisms; and multiplex 2 (M2) analyzed L206W, 1609delCA, R1066L/R1066H, R709X, and 1811 ϩ 1.6Kb polymorphisms.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15502086:51:98
status: NEW84 Peaks in the M1 multiplex correspond to the following mutations: 2869 insG, Q890X, K710X, and R1066C/S.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15502086:84:83
status: NEW85 Peaks sizes for the wild-type (WT) positions studied (nt) were as follows: for 2869 insG, 30.73-30.91; for Q890X, 36.04-36.33; for K710X, 41.34-41.66; for R1066C/S, 46.21-46.37.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15502086:85:131
status: NEW[hide] Identification of CFTR, PRSS1, and SPINK1 mutation... Pancreas. 2006 Oct;33(3):221-7. Keiles S, Kammesheidt A
Identification of CFTR, PRSS1, and SPINK1 mutations in 381 patients with pancreatitis.
Pancreas. 2006 Oct;33(3):221-7., [PMID:17003641]
Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVES: Chronic pancreatitis is a progressive inflammatory disorder leading to irreversible exocrine and/or endocrine impairment. It is well documented that mutations in the cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) gene can cause hereditary pancreatitis. Mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and the serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) genes are also associated with pancreatitis. METHODS: We analyzed 381 patients with a primary diagnosis of chronic or recurrent pancreatitis using the Ambry Test: Pancreatitis to obtain comprehensive genetic information for the CFTR, SPINK1, and PRSS1 genes. RESULTS: The results identified 32% (122/381) of patients with 166 mutant CFTR alleles, including 12 novel CFTR variants: 4375-20 A>G, F575Y, K598E, L1260P, G194R, F834L, S573C, 2789 + 17 C>T, 621+83 A>G, T164S, 621+25 A>G, and 3500-19 G>A. Of 122 patients with CFTR mutations, 5.5% (21/381) also carried a SPINK1 mutation, and 1.8% (7/381) carried a PRSS1 mutation. In addition, 8.9% (34/381) of all patients had 1 of 11 different SPINK1 mutations. Another 6.3% (24/381) of the patients had 1 of 8 different PRSS1 mutations. Moreover, 1.3% of the patients (5/381) had 1 PRSS1 and 1 SPINK1 mutation. A total 49% (185/381) of the patients carried one or more mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive testing of the CFTR, PRSS1, and SPINK1 genes identified genetic variants in nearly half of all subjects considered by their physicians as candidates for genetic testing. Comprehensive test identified numerous novel variants that would not be identified by standard clinical screening panels.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
54 Patients With More Than 1 CFTR Mutation CFTR Mutation 1 CFTR Mutation 2 CFTR Mutation 3 No. of Patients deltaF508 5T 3 deltaF508 D1152H 1 deltaF508 deltaF508 1 deltaF508 F575Y 1 deltaF508 K598E 1 deltaF508 T164S 1 deltaF508 R74W D1270N 1 deltaF508 Q1476X 1 deltaF508 L997F 1 R553X D1152H 1 R553X G1069R 1 2789+5 G9A 2183 AA9G 1 3849+10kb C9T L1260P 1 711+3 A to G I1139V 1 1341+1 G9A G194R 5T 1 621+25 A9G 3500-19 C9T 1 R74W V855I 1 G542X R117H 1 G551D F311L 1 G576A R668C 2 K710X L997F 1 L997F L320V 1 G1069R 5T 1 1818+18 G9A 5T 1 F1074L 5T 1 F834L 5T 1 R74Q R297Q 1 R74Q R297Q 5T 1 R785Q 5T 1 R117H 5T 3 deltaF508 I1027T 1 Total patients 36 MutationsinboldfacewouldnothavebeendetectedbytheAmericanCollegeofObstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG)/American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) mutation panel.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 17003641:54:475
status: NEW[hide] Localization studies of rare missense mutations in... Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1364-72. Krasnov KV, Tzetis M, Cheng J, Guggino WB, Cutting GR
Localization studies of rare missense mutations in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) facilitate interpretation of genotype-phenotype relationships.
Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1364-72., [PMID:18951463]
Abstract [show]
We have been investigating the functional consequences of rare disease-associated amino acid substitutions in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). Mutations of the arginine residue at codon 1070 have been associated with different disease consequences; R1070P and R1070Q with "severe" pancreatic insufficient cystic fibrosis (CF) and R1070W with "mild" pancreatic sufficient CF or congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Intriguingly, CFTR bearing each of these mutations is functional when expressed in nonpolarized cells. To determine whether R1070 mutations cause disease by affecting CFTR localization, we created polarized Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell lines that express either wild-type or mutant CFTR from the same genomic integration site. Confocal microscopy and biotinylation studies revealed that R1070P was not inserted into the apical membrane, R1070W was inserted at levels reduced from wild-type while R1070Q was present in the apical membrane at levels comparable to wild-type. The abnormal localization of CFTR bearing R1070P and R1070W was consistent with deleterious consequences in patients; however, the profile of CFTR R1070Q was inconsistent with a "severe" phenotype. Reanalysis of 16 patients with the R1070Q mutation revealed that 11 carried an in cis nonsense mutation, S466X. All 11 patients carrying the complex allele R1070Q-S466X had severe disease, while 4 out of 5 patients with R1070Q had "mild" disease, thereby reconciling the apparent discrepancy between the localization studies of R1070Q and the phenotype of patients bearing this mutation. Our results emphasize that localization studies in relevant model systems can greatly assist the interpretation of the disease-causing potential of rare missense mutations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
140 As for the remaining R1070W patients (8/24 with detailed clinical information), five individuals carried a CFTR mutation associated with pancreatic insufficiency (2869insG (c.2737insG, p.Tyr913fs); G542X (c.1624G4 T, p.Gly542X); R668C-K710X (c.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 18951463:140:235
status: NEW144 The one remaining individual with the R1070W/R668C-K710X genotype had pancreatic-insufficient CF.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 18951463:144:51
status: NEW[hide] CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis patients from Mu... Clin Genet. 2009 Dec;76(6):577-9. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Moya-Quiles MR, Mondejar-Lopez P, Pastor-Vivero MD, Gonzalez-Gallego I, Juan-Fita MJ, Egea-Mellado JM, Carbonell P, Casals T, Fernandez-Sanchez A, Sanchez-Solis M, Glover G
CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis patients from Murcia region (southeastern Spain): implications for genetic testing.
Clin Genet. 2009 Dec;76(6):577-9. Epub 2009 Oct 21., [PMID:19845690]
Abstract [show]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
17 of chromosomes Frequency (%) F508dela E.10 67 36.8 G542Xa E.11 22 12.1 A1006E E.17a 10 5.5 K710X E.13 10 5.5 2789+5G>Aa I.14b 9 4.9 L206W E.6a 7 3.8 1811+1.6kbA>G I.11 6 3.3 R334Wa E.7 5 2.7 2869insG E.15 5 2.7 I507dela E.10 4 2.2 N1303Ka E.21 4 2.2 R347Pa E.7 3 1.6 711+1G>Ta I.5 3 1.6 3849+10kbC>Ta I.19 3 1.6 Q890X E.15 3 1.6 R117Ha E.4 2 1.1 R1162Xa E.19 2 1.1 2183AA>Ga E.13 2 1.1 A561E E.12 2 1.1 R560G E.11 2 1.1 1717-1G>Aa I.10 1 0.5 E1308X E.21 1 0.5 E585X E.12 1 0.5 L997F E.17a 1 0.5 1677delTA E.10 1 0.5 R1158X E.19 1 0.5 W202X E.6a 1 0.5 R74W+D1270N E.3 + E.20 1 0.5 G576A+R668C E.12 + E.13 1 0.5 Unknown 2 1.1 Total 182 100 aCFTR mutations identified with the PCR OLA CF Genotyping Assay .
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 19845690:17:91
status: NEW20 Letter to the Editor Although we observed a marked difference in the frequency distribution of all mutations, it was interesting to note that the third and fourth most prevalent were A1006E and K710X, mutations undetected by commercial panels and each presenting with a frequency of 5.5%.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 19845690:20:194
status: NEW22 In Mediterranean France the K710X mutation showed a frequency of 0.93% and the A1006E mutation has never been reported (11).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 19845690:22:28
status: NEW27 This may be due to the relatively low influx of people from other Spanish regions, hence not diluting the frequency of mutations that are common in this region, including A1006E or K710X.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 19845690:27:181
status: NEW[hide] Genetic testing in pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(7):2202-6, 2206.e1. Epub 2010 Apr 20. Ooi CY, Gonska T, Durie PR, Freedman SD
Genetic testing in pancreatitis.
Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(7):2202-6, 2206.e1. Epub 2010 Apr 20., [PMID:20416310]
Abstract [show]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
53 Interpretation of Mutations Requires an Understanding of Their Functional Consequences Mutation group Reported mutations Complex allele: These mutations are recognized to occur on a single allele R117H ϩ T G576A ϩ R668C F508del ϩ I1027T Benign sequence alterations: These mutations have no known clinical consequence R74Q R297Q R74W 621 * 25 AϾG 3500-19 CϾT T164S C855I I1139V CFTR-related disorder associated: These mutations have been described in individuals with CF-like single organ disease (such as pancreatitis, sinopulmonary disease, or obstructive azoospermia), but do not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for CF 5T R117H D1270N L320V Q1352H 1818-18 GϾA S1235R CF causing F508del Q1476X R553X K710X G542X G551D F311L 2789-5 GϾA 2183AAϾG 711ϩ3 AϾG 3849ϩ10kb CϾT 1341ϩ1GϾA D1152Ha F1074La R553X Unknown clinical consequence F575Y L1260P G194R G1069R L997F K598E F834L R785Q To illustrate this point, mutations identified by extensive mutation testing in a cohort of patients with recurrent acute or chronic pancre- atitis14 are listed according to their clinical consequences (based on current consensus guidelines13 and functional and/or clinical reports; available: http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 20416310:53:737
status: NEW[hide] Comprehensive description of CFTR genotypes and ul... Hum Genet. 2011 Apr;129(4):387-96. Epub 2010 Dec 24. de Becdelievre A, Costa C, Jouannic JM, LeFloch A, Giurgea I, Martin J, Medina R, Boissier B, Gameiro C, Muller F, Goossens M, Alberti C, Girodon E
Comprehensive description of CFTR genotypes and ultrasound patterns in 694 cases of fetal bowel anomalies: a revised strategy.
Hum Genet. 2011 Apr;129(4):387-96. Epub 2010 Dec 24., [PMID:21184098]
Abstract [show]
Fetal bowel anomalies may reveal cystic fibrosis (CF) and the search for CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations is part of the diagnostic investigations in such pregnancies, according to European recommendations. We report on our 18-year experience to document comprehensive CFTR genotypes and correlations with ultrasound patterns in a series of 694 cases of fetal bowel anomalies. CFTR gene analysis was performed in a multistep process, including search for frequent mutations in the parents and subsequent in-depth search for rare mutations, depending on the context. Ultrasound patterns were correlated with the genotypes. Cases were distinguished according to whether they had been referred directly to our laboratory or after an initial testing in another laboratory. A total of 30 CF fetuses and 8 cases compatible with CFTR-related disorders were identified. CFTR rearrangements were found in 5/30 CF fetuses. 21.2% of fetuses carrying a frequent mutation had a second rare mutation, indicative of CF. The frequency of CF among fetuses with no frequent mutation was 0.43%. Correlation with ultrasound patterns revealed a significant frequency of multiple bowel anomalies in CF fetuses. The results emphasize the need to search for rearrangements in the diagnosis strategy of fetal bowel anomalies. The diagnostic value of ultrasound patterns combining hyperechogenic bowel, loop dilatation and/or non-visualized gallbladder reveals a need to revise current strategies and to offer extensive CFTR gene testing when the triad is diagnosed, even when no frequent mutation is found in the first-step analysis.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
116 [K710X] c.[1521_1523delCTT]?
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 21184098:116:1
status: NEW[hide] Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in an ethnically d... Clin Chem. 2011 Jun;57(6):841-8. Epub 2011 Apr 7. Rohlfs EM, Zhou Z, Heim RA, Nagan N, Rosenblum LS, Flynn K, Scholl T, Akmaev VR, Sirko-Osadsa DA, Allitto BA, Sugarman EA
Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in an ethnically diverse US population.
Clin Chem. 2011 Jun;57(6):841-8. Epub 2011 Apr 7., [PMID:21474639]
Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cystic fibrosis (CF) and the frequency of specific disease-causing mutations vary among populations. Affected individuals experience a range of serious clinical consequences, notably lung and pancreatic disease, which are only partially dependent on genotype. METHODS: An allele-specific primer-extension reaction, liquid-phase hybridization to a bead array, and subsequent fluorescence detection were used in testing for carriers of 98 CFTR [cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (ATP-binding cassette sub-family C, member 7)] mutations among 364 890 referred individuals with no family history of CF. RESULTS: One in 38 individuals carried one of the 98 CFTR mutations included in this panel. Of the 87 different mutations detected, 18 were limited to a single ethnic group. African American, Hispanic, and Asian individuals accounted for 33% of the individuals tested. The mutation frequency distribution of Caucasians was significantly different from that of each of these ethnic groups (P < 1 x 10(1)). CONCLUSIONS: Carrier testing using a broad mutation panel detects differences in the distribution of mutations among ethnic groups in the US.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
131 Four mutations (p.S1255X, p.G330X, c.313delA, p.S364P) were identified only in African Americans, 8 mutations (p.G178R, p.T338I, c.262_ 263delTT, p.M1101K, c.442delA, p.K710X, p.P574H, p.Q1238X)wereidentifiedonlyinCaucasians,and3mu- tations (c.580-1GϾT, c.531delT, p.Q890X) were identified only in Hispanics.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 21474639:131:169
status: NEW[hide] Spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in cystic f... Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Mar;71(Pt 2):194-201. Alonso MJ, Heine-Suner D, Calvo M, Rosell J, Gimenez J, Ramos MD, Telleria JJ, Palacio A, Estivill X, Casals T
Spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in cystic fibrosis patients of Spanish ancestry.
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Mar;71(Pt 2):194-201., [PMID:17331079]
Abstract [show]
We analyzed 1,954 Spanish cystic fibrosis (CF) alleles in order to define the molecular spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in Spanish CF patients. Commercial panels showed a limited detection power, leading to the identification of only 76% of alleles. Two scanning techniques, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and single strand conformation polymorphism/hetroduplex (SSCP/HD), were carried out to detect CFTR sequence changes. In addition, intragenic markers IVS8CA, IVS8-6(T)n and IVS17bTA were also analyzed. Twelve mutations showed frequencies above 1%, p.F508del being the most frequent mutation (51%). We found that eighteen mutations need to be studied to achieve a detection level of 80%. Fifty-one mutations (42%) were observed once. In total, 121 disease-causing mutations were identified, accounting for 96% (1,877 out of 1,954) of CF alleles. Specific geographic distributions for the most common mutations, p.F508del, p.G542X, c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G and c.1609delCA, were confirmed. Furthermore, two other relatively common mutations (p.V232D and c.2789 + 5G > A) showed uneven geographic distributions. This updated information on the spectrum of CF mutations in Spain will be useful for improving genetic testing, as well as to facilitate counselling in people of Spanish ancestry. In addition, this study contributes to defining the molecular spectrum of CF in Europe, and corroborates the high molecular mutation heterogeneity of Mediterranean populations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
45 (%) p.F508del # E.10 1009 (51.74) p.G542X # E.11 150 (7.69) p.N1303K # E.21 57 (2.92) c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G I.11 36 (1.84) p.R334W # E.7 35 (1.79) p.L206W E.6a 32 (1.64) c.711 + 1G > T # I.5 31 (1.58) p.Q890X E.15 28 (1.43) p.R1162X # E.19 25 (1.28) c.2789 + 5G > A # I.14b 24 (1.23) p.R1066C E.17b 23 (1.18) p.I507del # E.10 21 (1.07) c.1609delCA E.10 18 (0.92) c.712-1G > T I.5 18 (0.92) c.3272-26A > G I.17a 18 (0.92) c.2183AA > G # E.13 16 (0.82) p.G85E # E.3 15 (0.77) c.2869insG E.15 15 (0.77) p.W1282X # E.20 15 (0.77) p.V232D E.6a 14 (0.71) p.A1006E * E.17a 12 (0.61) c.2184insA E.13 11 (0.56) p.K710X E.13 11 (0.56) TOTAL (n = 23) 1,634 (83.72) * , the complex allele [p.A1006E; p.V562I; IVS8-6(5T)] #, CF mutations identified with the Celera Diagnosis Cystic Fibrosis v2 genotyping assay and the Inno-Lipa CFTR12, CFTR17 + Tn Samples with microsatellite haplotypes 16/45-46-47 (IVS8CA/IVS17bTA) were submitted to direct analysis of the c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G mutation, which was found mainly associated with the 16-46 haplotype.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 17331079:45:602
status: NEW[hide] Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: Polish 4 ye... Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Aug 15. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.180. Sobczynska-Tomaszewska A, Oltarzewski M, Czerska K, Wertheim-Tysarowska K, Sands D, Walkowiak J, Bal J, Mazurczak T
Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: Polish 4 years' experience with CFTR sequencing strategy.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Aug 15. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.180., [PMID:22892530]
Abstract [show]
Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (NBS CF) in Poland was started in September 2006. Summary from 4 years' experience is presented in this study. The immunoreactive trypsin/DNA sequencing strategy was implemented. The group of 1 212 487 newborns were screened for cystic fibrosis during the programme. We identified a total of 221 CF cases during this period, including, 4 CF cases were reported to be omitted by NBS CF. Disease incidence in Poland based on the programme results was estimated as 1/4394 and carrier frequency as 1/33. The frequency of the F508del was similar (62%) to population data previously reported. This strategy allowed us to identify 29 affected infants with rare genotypes. The frequency of some mutations (eg, 2184insA, K710X) was assessed in Poland for the first time. Thus, sequencing assay seems to be accurate method for screening programme using blood spots in the Polish population.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 15 August 2012; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.180.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
8 The frequency of some mutations (eg, 2184insA, K710X) was assessed in Poland for the first time.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 22892530:8:47
status: NEW15 Only one mutation, the F508del accounts for B70% of CFTR mutant alleles in Europe but this also differs between populations.12,13 In Polish CF patients the frequency of the F508del mutation is estimated as 53-57%.14,15 According to the a panel of the most frequent mutations in Polish CF patients published in 200916 and our personal experience (unpublished data), mutations such as K710X and 2184insA have a frequency 40.45%.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 22892530:15:383
status: NEW57 Mutations D537N and P731L have not been Period of NBS CF Method The most frequent mutations in Polish population under analysis September 2006 - December 2007 Estonia Asper Biotech assay E60X, G85E, 394delTT, R117H, R117P, R117L, I148T, 621G>A, 711+1G>T, 711+5G>A, 1078delT, R334W, R347H, R347P, R347L, IVS8-T, A455E, I507del, F508del, 1717-1G>A, G542X, p.G551D, Q552X, R553X, R553G, R560T, R560K, 1898+1G>A, 1898+1G>T, 1898+1G>C, 2143delT, 2184delA, 2183AA>G, 2789+5G>A, 3120+1G>A, 3199del6, 3272-26A>G, R1162X, 3659delC, 3849+10kbC>T, 3905insT, S1235R, S1251N, W1282X, W1282C, N1303K, CFTRdele2,3 January 2007 - June 2009 Sanger sequencing of exons: 4, 7, 10, 11, 13, 21, fragment of intron 19 F508del, CFTRdele2,3, 3849+10kbC>T, R117H+IVS8-T*, R334W, R347P, 1717-1G>A, G542X, R553X, K710X, 2184insA, 2143delT, 2183AA>G, N1303K July 2009 - currently Sanger sequencing of exons: 7, 10, 11, 13, 17b, 20, 21, fragment of intron 19 F508del, CFTRdele2,3, 3849+10kbC>T, R334W, R347P, 1717-1G>A, G542X, R553X, K710X, 2184insA, 2143delT, 2183AA>G, N1303K, 3272-26A>G**, W1282X** * removed from DNA analysis since July 2009 , **added into DNA analysis since July 2009 Figure 1 NBS CF in Poland.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 22892530:57:786
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 22892530:57:1005
status: NEW72 Table 2 Genotypes of CF newborns with mutations not included into common commercial kits applied in Poland and European countries* Genotype Number of cases [F508del]; [1767-8T4A*] 1 [F508del];[2184insA*] 6 [F508del];[E33X*] 1 [F508del];[F1286C*] 1 [F508del];[G314R*] 1 [F508del];[K710X*] 1 [F508del];[W1282R*] 1 [F508del];[1898 þ 1G4C*] 1 [F508del];[3600 þ 2insT*] 1 [F508del];[F1052V*] 1 [F508del];[V1240G*] 1 [F508del];[T582I*] 1 [2143delT];[R1102X*] 1 [2143delT];[2721del11*] 1 [3272-26A4G];[K967S*] 1 [CFTRdele2,3];[Y1092X*] 1 [K710X*];[K710X*] 1 [L732X*];[3600 þ 2insT*] 1 [N1303K];[2184insA*] 1 [N1303L];[T1036I*] 1 [R553X];[3182ins8*] 1 [2143delT];[V1240G*] 1 [R553X];[Trp356X*] 1 [L997F*];[1210-12T[5];1210-13G4T] 1 Total 29 Table 3 Frequency of CFTR mutations in Polish CF patients from newborns screening programme CFTR mutations Frequency according to Bobadilla et al15 Frequency according to NBS CF results (all ¼ 442 CF alleles) Name Position % % F508del Exon11 57.1 62.4 3849 þ 10kbC4T Intron 22 2.7 3.0 G542X Exon 12 2.6 1.6 1717-1G4A Intron 11 2.4 1.4 R553X Exon 12 1.9 2.5 CFTRdele2,3 Exons 2 and 3 1.8 6.2 N1303K Exon 24 1.8 2.1 2143delT Exon 14 No data 2.8 2184insA Exon 14 No data 1.8 2183AA4G Exon 14 No data 1.6 W1282X Exon 23 0.7 1.5 R334W Exon 8 No data 0.7 R347P Exon 8 No data 0.5 G551D Exon 12 0.5 0.0 K710X Exon 14 No data 0.7 3272-26A4G Intron 19 No data 0.7 3600 þ 2insT Intron 21 No data 0.5 1898 þ 1G4C Intron 13 No data 0.5 V1240G Exon 23 No data 0.5 Othersa - No data 10.0 Abbreviations: CF, cystic fibrosis; NBS CF, newborn screening for CF.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 22892530:72:1349
status: NEW98 Data from the Polish registry were used to designate the CFTR gene mutations and to prepare a 'Polish assay` with mutations such as K710X and 2184insA.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 22892530:98:132
status: NEW[hide] Genotyping microarray for the detection of more th... J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):375-87. Schrijver I, Oitmaa E, Metspalu A, Gardner P
Genotyping microarray for the detection of more than 200 CFTR mutations in ethnically diverse populations.
J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):375-87., [PMID:16049310]
Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF), which is due to mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene, is a common life-shortening disease. Although CF occurs with the highest incidence in Caucasians, it also occurs in other ethnicities with variable frequency. Recent national guidelines suggest that all couples contemplating pregnancy should be informed of molecular screening for CF carrier status for purposes of genetic counseling. Commercially available CF carrier screening panels offer a limited panel of mutations, however, making them insufficiently sensitive for certain groups within an ethnically diverse population. This discrepancy is even more pronounced when such carrier screening panels are used for diagnostic purposes. By means of arrayed primer extension technology, we have designed a genotyping microarray with 204 probe sites for CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutation detection. The arrayed primer extension array, based on a platform technology for disease detection with multiple applications, is a robust, cost-effective, and easily modifiable assay suitable for CF carrier screening and disease detection.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
51 Complete List of Mutations Detectable with the CF APEX Assay CFTR location Amino acid change Nucleotide change 1 E 1 Frameshift 175delC 2 E 2,3 Frameshift del E2, E3 3 E 2 W19C 189 GϾT 4 E 2 Q39X 247 CϾT 5 IVS 2 Possible splicing defect 296 ϩ 12 TϾC 6 E 3 Frameshift 359insT 7 E 3 Frameshift 394delTT 8 E 3 W57X (TAG) 302GϾA 9 E 3 W57X (TGA) 303GϾA 10 E 3 E60X 310GϾT 11 E 3 P67L 332CϾT 12 E 3 R74Q 353GϾA 13 E 3 R75X 355CϾT 14 E 3 G85E 386GϾA 15 E 3 G91R 403GϾA 16 IVS 3 Splicing defect 405 ϩ 1GϾA 17 IVS 3 Possible splicing defect 405 ϩ 3AϾC 18 IVS 3 Splicing defect 406 - 1GϾA 19 E 4 E92X 406GϾT 20 E 4 E92K 406GϾA 21 E 4 Q98R 425AϾG 22 E 4 Q98P 425AϾC 23 E 4 Frameshift 444delA 24 E 4 Frameshift 457TATϾG 25 E 4 R117C 481CϾT 26 E 4 R117H 482GϾA 27 E 4 R117P 482GϾC 28 E 4 R117L 482GϾT 29 E 4 Y122X 498TϾA 30 E 4 Frameshift 574delA 31 E 4 I148T 575TϾC 32 E 4 Splicing defect 621GϾA 33 IVS 4 Splicing defect 621 ϩ 1GϾT 34 IVS 4 Splicing defect 621 ϩ 3AϾG 35 E 5 Frameshift 624delT 36 E 5 Frameshift 663delT 37 E 5 G178R 664GϾA 38 E 5 Q179K 667CϾA 39 IVS 5 Splicing defect 711 ϩ 1GϾT 40 IVS 5 Splicing defect 711 ϩ 1GϾA 41 IVS 5 Splicing defect 712 - 1GϾT 42 E 6a H199Y 727CϾT 43 E 6a P205S 745CϾT 44 E 6a L206W 749TϾG 45 E 6a Q220X 790CϾT 46 E 6b Frameshift 935delA 47 E 6b Frameshift 936delTA 48 E 6b N287Y 991AϾT 49 IVS 6b Splicing defect 1002 - 3TϾG 50 E 7 ⌬F311 3-bp del between nucleotides 1059 and 1069 51 E 7 Frameshift 1078delT 52 E 7 Frameshift 1119delA 53 E 7 G330X 1120GϾT 54 E 7 R334W 1132CϾT 55 E 7 I336K 1139TϾA 56 E 7 T338I 1145CϾT 57 E 7 Frameshift 1154insTC 58 E 7 Frameshift 1161delC 59 E 7 L346P 1169TϾC 60 E 7 R347H 1172GϾA 61 E 7 R347P 1172GϾC 62 E 7 R347L 1172GϾT 63 E 7 R352Q 1187GϾA 64 E 7 Q359K/T360K 1207CϾA and 1211CϾA 65 E 7 S364P 1222TϾC 66 E 8 Frameshift 1259insA 67 E 8 W401X (TAG) 1334GϾA 68 E 8 W401X (TGA) 1335GϾA 69 IVS 8 Splicing changes 1342 - 6 poly(T) variants 5T/7T/9T 70 IVS 8 Splicing defect 1342 - 2AϾC Table 1. Continued CFTR location Amino acid change Nucleotide change 71 E 9 A455E 1496CϾA 72 E 9 Frameshift 1504delG 73 E 10 G480C 1570GϾT 74 E 10 Q493X 1609CϾT 75 E 10 Frameshift 1609delCA 76 E 10 ⌬I507 3-bp del between nucleotides 1648 and 1653 77 E 10 ⌬F508 3-bp del between nucleotides 1652 and 1655 78 E 10 Frameshift 1677delTA 79 E 10 V520F 1690GϾT 80 E 10 C524X 1704CϾA 81 IVS 10 Possible splicing defect 1717 - 8GϾA 82 IVS 10 Splicing defect 1717 - 1GϾA 83 E 11 G542X 1756GϾT 84 E 11 G551D 1784GϾA 85 E 11 Frameshift 1784delG 86 E 11 S549R (AϾC) 1777AϾC 87 E 11 S549I 1778GϾT 88 E 11 S549N 1778GϾA 89 E 11 S549R (TϾG) 1779TϾG 90 E 11 Q552X 1786CϾT 91 E 11 R553X 1789CϾT 92 E 11 R553G 1789CϾG 93 E 11 R553Q 1790GϾA 94 E 11 L558S 1805TϾC 95 E 11 A559T 1807GϾA 96 E 11 R560T 1811GϾC 97 E 11 R560K 1811GϾA 98 IVS 11 Splicing defect 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG 99 IVS 11 Splicing defect 1812 - 1GϾA 100 E 12 Y563D 1819TϾG 101 E 12 Y563N 1819TϾA 102 E 12 Frameshift 1833delT 103 E 12 D572N 1846GϾA 104 E 12 P574H 1853CϾA 105 E 12 T582R 1877CϾG 106 E 12 E585X 1885GϾT 107 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 5GϾT 108 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾA 109 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾC 110 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾT 111 E 13 Frameshift 1924del7 112 E 13 del of 28 amino acids 1949del84 113 E 13 I618T 1985TϾC 114 E 13 Frameshift 2183AAϾG 115 E 13 Frameshift 2043delG 116 E 13 Frameshift 2055del9ϾA 117 E 13 D648V 2075TϾA 118 E 13 Frameshift 2105-2117 del13insAGAA 119 E 13 Frameshift 2108delA 120 E 13 R668C 2134CϾT 121 E 13 Frameshift 2143delT 122 E 13 Frameshift 2176insC 123 E 13 Frameshift 2184delA 124 E 13 Frameshift 2184insA 125 E 13 Q685X 2185CϾT 126 E 13 R709X 2257CϾT 127 E 13 K710X 2260AϾT 128 E 13 Frameshift 2307insA 129 E 13 V754M 2392GϾA 130 E 13 R764X 2422CϾT 131 E 14a W846X 2670GϾA 132 E 14a Frameshift 2734delGinsAT 133 E 14b Frameshift 2766del8 134 IVS 14b Splicing defect 2789 ϩ 5GϾA 135 IVS 14b Splicing defect 2790 - 2AϾG 136 E 15 Q890X 2800CϾT 137 E 15 Frameshift 2869insG 138 E 15 S945L 2966CϾT 139 E 15 Frameshift 2991del32 140 E 16 Splicing defect 3120GϾA interrogation: ACCAACATGTTTTCTTTGATCTTAC 3121-2A3G,T S; 5Ј-ACCAACATGTTTTCTTTGATCTTAC A GTTGTTATTAATTGTGATTGGAGCTATAG-3Ј; CAACAA- TAATTAACACTAACCTCGA 3121-2A3G,T AS.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 16049310:51:4304
status: NEW150 Primers Generated to Create Synthetic Templates That Serve As Positive Mutation Controls Primer name Sense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Name Antisense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј 175delC synt F T(15)ATTTTTTTCAGGTGAGAAGGTGGCCA 175delC synt R T(15)ATTTGGAGACAACGCTGGCCTTTTCC W19C synt F T(15)TACCAGACCAATTTTGAGGAAAGGAT W19C synt R T(15)ACAGCTAAAATAAAGAGAGGAGGAAC Q39X synt F T(15)TAAATCCCTTCTGTTGATTCTGCTGA Q39X synt R T(15)AGTATATGTCTGACAATTCCAGGCGC 296 ϩ 12TϾC synt F T(15)CACATTGTTTAGTTGAAGAGAGAAAT 296 ϩ 12TϾC synt R T(15)GCATGAACATACCTTTCCAATTTTTC 359insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATGTTCTAT 359insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAACATCGCCGAAGGGCATTAA E60X synt F T(15)TAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAAAATCCTAA E60X synt R T(15)ATCTATCCCATTCTCTGCAAAAGAAT P67L synt F T(15)TTAAACTCATTAATGCCCTTCGGCGA P67L synt R T(15)AGATTTTTCTTTGAAGCCAGCTCTCT R74Q synt F T(15)AGCGATGTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATG R74Q synt R T(15)TGAAGGGCATTAATGAGTTTAGGATT R75X synt F T(15)TGATGTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATGTT R75X synt R T(15)ACCGAAGGGCATTAATGAGTTTAGGA W57X(TAG) synt F T(15)AGGATAGAGAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAA W57X(TAG) synt R T(15)TATTCTCTGCAAAAGAATAAAAAGTG W57X(TGA) synt F T(15)AGATAGAGAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAAA W57X(TGA) synt R T(15)TCATTCTCTGCAAAAGAATAAAAAGT G91R synt F T(15)AGGGTAAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTC G91R synt R T(15)TTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCATAGAAC 405 ϩ 1GϾA synt F T(15)ATAAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTCATT 405 ϩ 1GϾA synt R T(15)TCCCTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCATAG 405 ϩ 3AϾC synt F T(15)CAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTCATTAT 405 ϩ 3AϾC synt R T(15)GACCCCTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCAT 406 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AGAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTC 406 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAAT E92X synt F T(15)TAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTCT E92X synt R T(15)ACTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAA E92K synt F T(15)AAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTCT E92K synt R T(15)TCTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAA 444delA synt F T(15)GATCATAGCTTCCTATGACCCGGATA 444delA synt R T(15)ATCTTCCCAGTAAGAGAGGCTGTACT 574delA synt F T(15)CTTGGAATGCAGATGAGAATAGCTAT 574delA synt R T(15)AGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGGCTGGG 621GϾA synt F T(15)AGTAATACTTCCTTGCACAGGCCCCA 621GϾA synt R T(15)TTTCTTATAAATCAAACTAAACATAG Q98P synt F T(15)CGCCTCTCTTACTGGGAAGAATCATA Q98P synt R T(15)GGTACTGCTTTGGTGACTTCCTACAA 457TATϾG synt F T(15)GGACCCGGATAACAAGGAGGAACGCT 457TATϾG synt R T(15)CGGAAGCTATGATTCTTCCCAGTAAG I148T synt F T(15)CTGGAATGCAGATGAGAATAGCTATG I148T synt R T(15)GTGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGGCTGG 624delT synt F T(15)CTTAAAGCTGTCAAGCCGTGTTCTAG 624delT synt R T(15)TAAGTCTAAAAGAAAAATGGAAAGTT 663delT synt F T(15)ATGGACAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCC 663delT synt R T(15)CATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACACGGC G178R synt F T(15)AGACAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCCAA G178R synt R T(15)TAATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACACGG Q179K synt F T(15)AAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCCAACAA Q179K synt R T(15)TTCCAATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACA 711 ϩ 5GϾA synt F T(15)ATACCTATTGATTTAATCTTTTAGGC 711 ϩ 5GϾA synt R T(15)TTATACTTCATCAAATTTGTTCAGGT 712 - 1GϾT synt F T(15)TGGACTTGCATTGGCACATTTCGTGT 712 - 1GϾT synt R T(15)TATGGAAAATAAAAGCACAGCAAAAAC H199Y synt F T(15)TATTTCGTGTGGATCGCTCCTTTGCA H199Y synt R T(15)TATGCCAATGCTAGTCCCTGGAAAATA P205S synt F T(15)TCTTTGCAAGTGGCACTCCTCATGGG P205S synt R T(15)TAAGCGATCCACACGAAATGTGCCAAT L206W synt F T(15)GGCAAGTGGCACTCCTCATGGGGCTA L206W synt R T(15)TCAAGGAGCGATCCACACGAAATGTGC Q220X synt F T(15)TAGGCGTCTGCTTTCTGTGGACTTGG Q220X synt R T(15)TATAACAACTCCCAGATTAGCCCCATG 936delTA synt F T(15)AATCCAATCTGTTAAGGCATACTGCT 936delTA synt R T(15)TGATTTTCAATCATTTCTGAGGTAATC 935delA synt F T(15)GAAATATCCAATCTGTTAAGGCATAC 935delA synt R T(15)TATTTCAATCATTTCTGAGGTAATCAC N287Y synt F T(15)TACTTAAGACAGTAAGTTGTTCCAAT N287Y synt R T(15)TATTCAATCATTTTTTCCATTGCTTCT 1002 - 3TϾG synt F T(15)GAGAACAGAACTGAAACTGACTCGGA 1002 - 3TϾG synt R T(15)TCTAAAAAACAATAACAATAAAATTCA 1154insTC syntwt F T(15)ATCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTGCGCAT 1154insTC syntwt R T(15)TTGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTTTCCGGA 1154insTC syntmt F T(15)TCTCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTGCGCAT 1154insTC syntmt R T(15)TAGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTTTCCGGA DF311 mt syntV1 F T(15)CCTTCTTCTCAGGGTTCTTTGTGGTG dF311 mt syntV1 R T(15)GAGAAGAAGGCTGAGCTATTGAAGTATC G330X synt F T(15)TGAATCATCCTCCGGAAAATATTCAC G330X synt R T(15)ATTTGATTAGTGCATAGGGAAGCACA S364P synt F T(15)CCTCTTGGAGCAATAAACAAAATACA S364P synt R T(15)GGTCATACCATGTTTGTACAGCCCAG Q359K/T360K mt synt F T(15)AAAAAATGGTATGACTCTCTTGGAGC Q359K/T360K mt synt R T(15)TTTTTTACAGCCCAGGGAAATTGCCG 1078delT synt F T(15)CTTGTGGTGTTTTTATCTGTGCTTCC 1078delT synt R T(15)CAAGAACCCTGAGAAGAAGAAGGCTG 1119delA synt F T(15)CAAGGAATCATCCTCCGGAAAATATT 1119delA synt R T(15)CTTGATTAGTGCATAGGGAAGCACAG 1161delC synt F T(15)GATTGTTCTGCGCATGGCGGTCACTC 1161delC synt R T(15)TCAGAATGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTT T338I synt F T(15)TCACCATCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTG T338I synt R T(15)ATGAATATTTTCCGGAGGATGATTCC R352Q synt F T(15)AGCAATTTCCCTGGGCTGTACAAACA R352Q synt R T(15)TGAGTGACCGCCATGCGCAGAACAAT L346P synt F T(15)CGCGCATGGCGGTCACTCGGCAATTT L346P synt R T(15)GGAACAATGCAGAATGAGATGGTGGT 1259insA synt F T(15)AAAAAGCAAGAATATAAGACATTGGA 1259insA synt R T(15)TTTTTGTAAGAAATCCTATTTATAAA W401X(TAG)mtsynt F T(15)AGGAGGAGGTCAGAATTTTTAAAAAA W401X(TAG)mtsynt R T(15)TAGAAGGCTGTTACATTCTCCATCAC W401X(TGA) synt F T(15)AGAGGAGGTCAGAATTTTTAAAAAAT W401X(TGA) synt R T(15)TCAGAAGGCTGTTACATTCTCCATCA 1342 - 2AϾC synt F T(15)CGGGATTTGGGGAATTATTTGAGAAA 1342 - 2AϾC synt R T(15)GGTTAAAAAAACACACACACACACAC 1504delG synt F T(15)TGATCCACTGTAGCAGGCAAGGTAGT 1504delG synt R T(15)TCAGCAACCGCCAACAACTGTCCTCT G480C synt F T(15)TGTAAAATTAAGCACAGTGGAAGAAT G480C synt R T(15)ACTCTGAAGGCTCCAGTTCTCCCATA C524X synt F T(15)ACAACTAGAAGAGGTAAGAAACTATG C524X synt R T(15)TCATGCTTTGATGACGCTTCTGTATC V520F synt F T(15)TTCATCAAAGCAAGCCAACTAGAAGA V520F synt R T(15)AGCTTCTGTATCTATATTCATCATAG 1609delCA synt F T(15)TGTTTTCCTGGATTATGCCTGGCACC 1609delCA synt R T(15)CAGAACAGAATGAAATTCTTCCACTG 1717 - 8GϾA synt F T(15)AGTAATAGGACATCTCCAAGTTTGCA 1717 - 8GϾA synt R T(15)TAAAAATAGAAAATTAGAGAGTCACT 1784delG synt F T(15)AGTCAACGAGCAAGAATTTCTTTAGC 1784delG synt R T(15)ACTCCACTCAGTGTGATTCCACCTTC A559T synt F T(15)ACAAGGTGAATAACTAATTATTGGTC A559T synt R T(15)TTAAAGAAATTCTTGCTCGTTGACCT Q552X synt F T(15)TAACGAGCAAGAATTTCTTTAGCAAG Q552X synt R T(15)AACCTCCACTCAGTGTGATTCCACCT S549R(AϾC) synt F T(15)CGTGGAGGTCAACGAGCAAGAATTTC S549R(AϾC) synt R T(15)GCAGTGTGATTCTACCTTCTCCAAGA S549R(TϾG) synt F T(15)GGGAGGTCAACGAGCAAGTATTTC S549R(TϾG) synt R T(15)CCTCAGTGTGATTCCACCTTCTCCAA L558S synt F T(15)CAGCAAGGTGAATAACTAATTATTGG L558S synt R T(15)GAAGAAATTCTCGCTCGTTGACCTCC 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG synt F T(15)GTAAGTAAGGTTACTATCAATCACAC 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG synt R T(15)CATCTCAAGTACATAGGATTCTCTGT 1812 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AAGCAGTATACAAAGATGCTGATTTG 1812 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTAAAAAGAAAATGGAAATTAAATTA D572N synt F T(15)AACTCTCCTTTTGGATACCTAGATGT D572N synt R T(15)TTAATAAATACAAATCAGCATCTTTG P574H synt F T(15)ATTTTGGATACCTAGATGTTTTAACA P574H synt R T(15)TGAGAGTCTAATAAATACAAATCAGC 1833delT synt F T(15)ATTGTATTTATTAGACTCTCCTTTTG 1833delT synt R T(15)CAATCAGCATCTTTGTATACTGCTCT Table 4. Continued Primer name Sense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Name Antisense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Y563D synt F T(15)GACAAAGATGCTGATTTGTATTTATT Y563D synt R T(15)CTACTGCTCTAAAAAGAAAATGGAAA T582R synt F T(15)GAGAAAAAGAAATATTTGAAAGGTAT T582R synt R T(15)CTTAAAACATCTAGGTATCCAAAAGG E585X synt F T(15)TAAATATTTGAAAGGTATGTTCTTTG E585X synt R T(15)ATTTTTCTGTTAAAACATCTAGGTAT 1898 ϩ 5GϾT synt F T(15)TTTCTTTGAATACCTTACTTATATTG 1898 ϩ 5GϾT synt R T(15)AATACCTTTCAAATATTTCTTTTTCT 1924del7 synt F T(15)CAGGATTTTGGTCACTTCTAAAATGG 1924del7 synt R T(15)CTGTTAGCCATCAGTTTACAGACACA 2055del9ϾA synt F T(15)ACATGGGATGTGATTCTTTCGACCAA 2055del9ϾA synt R T(15)TCTAAAGTCTGGCTGTAGATTTTGGA D648V synt F T(15)TTTCTTTCGACCAATTTAGTGCAGAA D648V synt R T(15)ACACATCCCATGAGTTTTGAGCTAAA K710X synt F T(15)TAATTTTCCATTGTGCAAAAGACTCC K710X synt R T(15)ATCGTATAGAGTTGATTGGATTGAGA I618T synt F T(15)CTTTGCATGAAGGTAGCAGCTATTTT I618T synt R T(15)GTTAATATTTTGTCAGCTTTCTTTAA R764X synt F T(15)TGAAGGAGGCAGTCTGTCCTGAACCT R764X synt R T(15)ATGCCTGAAGCGTGGGGCCAGTGCTG Q685X synt F T(15)TAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGGAGAGTT Q685X synt R T(15)ATTTTTTTGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACA R709X synt F T(15)TGAAAATTTTCCATTGTGCAAAAGAC R709X synt R T(15)ATATAGAGTTGATTGGATTGAGAATA V754M synt F T(15)ATGATCAGCACTGGCCCCACGCTTCA V754M synt R T(15)TGCTGATGCGAGGCAGTATCGCCTCT 1949del84 synt F T(15)AAAAATCTACAGCCAGACTTTATCTC 1949del84 synt R T(15)TTTTTAGAAGTGACCAAAATCCTAGT 2108delA synt F T(15)GAATTCAATCCTAACTGAGACCTTAC 2108delA synt R T(15)ATTCTTCTTTCTGCACTAAATTGGTC 2176insC synt F T(15)CCAAAAAAACAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGGAGAG 2176insC synt R T(15)GGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACAGGAGCAT 2184delA synt F T(15)CAAAAAACAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGG 2184delA synt R T(15)GTTTTTTGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACAG 2105-2117 del13 synt F T(15)AAACTGAGACCTTACACCGTTTCTCA 2105-2117 del13 synt R T(15)TTTCTTTCTGCACTAAATTGGTCGAA 2307insA synt F T(15)AAAGAGGATTCTGATGAGCCTTTAGA 2307insA synt R T(15)TTTCGATGCCATTCATTTGTAAGGGA W846X synt F T(15)AAACACATACCTTCGATATATTACTGTCCAC W846X synt R T(15)TCATGTAGTCACTGCTGGTATGCTCT 2734G/AT synt F T(15)TTAATTTTTCTGGCAGAGGTAAGAAT 2734G/AT synt R T(15)TTAAGCACCAAATTAGCACAAAAATT 2766del8 synt F T(15)GGTGGCTCCTTGGAAAGTGAGTATTC 2766del8 synt R T(15)CACCAAAGAAGCAGCCACCTGGAATGG 2790 - 2AϾG synt F T(15)GGCACTCCTCTTCAAGACAAAGGGAA 2790 - 2AϾG synt R T(15)CGTAAAGCAAATAGGAAATCGTTAAT 2991del32 synt F T(15)TTCAACACGTCGAAAGCAGGTACTTT 2991del32 synt R T(15)AAACATTTTGTGGTGTAAAATTTTCG Q890X synt F T(15)TAAGACAAAGGGAATAGTACTCATAG Q890X synt R T(15)AAAGAGGAGTGCTGTAAAGCAAATAG 2869insG synt F T(15)GATTATGTGTTTTACATTTACGTGGG 2869insG synt R T(15)CACGAACTGGTGCTGGTGATAATCAC 3120GϾA synt F T(15)AGTATGTAAAAATAAGTACCGTTAAG 3120GϾA synt R T(15)TTGGATGAAGTCAAATATGGTAAGAG 3121 - 2AϾT synt F T(15)TGTTGTTATTAATTGTGATTGGAGCT 3121 - 2AϾT synt R T(15)AGTAAGATCAAAGAAAACATGTTGGT 3132delTG synt F T(15)TTGATTGGAGCCATAGCAGTTGTCGC 3132delTG synt R T(15)AATTAATAACAACTGTAAGATCAAAG 3271delGG synt F T(15)ATATGACAGTGAATGTGCGATACTCA 3271delGG synt R T(15)ATTCAGATTCCAGTTGTTTGAGTTGC 3171delC synt F T(15)ACCTACATCTTTGTTGCAACAGTGCC 3171delC synt R T(15)AGGTTGTAAAACTGCGACAACTGCTA 3171insC synt F T(15)CCCCTACATCTTTGTTGCTACAGTGC 3171insC synt R T(15)GGGGTTGTAAAACTGCGACAACTGCT 3199del6 synt F T(15)GAGTGGCTTTTATTATGTTGAGAGCATAT 3199del6 synt R T(15)CCACTGGCACTGTTGCAACAAAGATG M1101K synt F T(15)AGAGAATAGAAATGATTTTTGTCATC M1101K synt R T(15)TTTTGGAACCAGCGCAGTGTTGACAG G1061R synt F T(15)CGACTATGGACACTTCGTGCCTTCGG G1061R synt R T(15)GTTTTAAGCTTGTAACAAGATGAGTG R1066L synt F T(15)TTGCCTTCGGACGGCAGCCTTACTTT R1066L synt R T(15)AGAAGTGTCCATAGTCCTTTTAAGCT R1070P synt F T(15)CGCAGCCTTACTTTGAAACTCTGTTC R1070P synt R T(15)GGTCCGAAGGCACGAAGTGTCCATAG L1077P synt F T(15)CGTTCCACAAAGCTCTGAATTTACAT L1077P synt R T(15)GGAGTTTCAAAGTAAGGCTGCCGTCC W1089X synt F T(15)AGTTCTTGTACCTGTCAACACTGCGC W1089X synt R T(15)TAGTTGGCAGTATGTAAATTCAGAGC L1093P synt F T(15)CGTCAACACTGCGCTGGTTCCAAATG L1093P synt R T(15)GGGTACAAGAACCAGTTGGCAGTATG W1098R synt F T(15)CGGTTCCAAATGAGAATAGAAATGAT W1098R synt R T(15)GGCGCAGTGTTGACAGGTACAAGAAC Q1100P synt F T(15)CAATGAGAATAGAAATGATTTTTGTC Q1100P synt R T(15)GGGAACCAGCGCAGTGTTGACAGGTA D1152H synt F T(15)CATGTGGATAGCTTGGTAAGTCTTAT D1152H synt R T(15)GTATGCTGGAGTTTACAGCCCACTGC R1158X synt F T(15)TGATCTGTGAGCCGAGTCTTTAAGTT R1158X synt R T(15)ACATCTGAAATAAAAATAACAACATT S1196X synt F T(15)GACACGTGAAGAAAGATGACATCTGG S1196X synt R T(15)CAATTCTCAATAATCATAACTTTCGA 3732delA synt F T(15)GGAGATGACATCTGGCCCTCAGGGGG 3732delA synt R T(15)CTCCTTCACGTGTGAATTCTCAATAA 3791delC synt F T(15)AAGAAGGTGGAAATGCCATATTAGAG 3791delC synt R T(15)TTGTATTTTGCTGTGAGATCTTTGAC 3821delT synt F T(15)ATTCCTTCTCAATAAGTCCTGGCCAG 3821delT synt R T(15)GAATGTTCTCTAATATGGCATTTCCA Q1238X synt F T(15)TAGAGGGTGAGATTTGAACACTGCTT Q1238X synt R T(15)AGCCAGGACTTATTGAGAAGGAAATG S1255X (ex19)synt F T(15)GTCTGGCCCTCAGGGGGCCAAATGAC S1255X (ex19) synt R T(15)CGTCATCTTTCTTCACGTGTGAATTC S1255X;L synt F T(15)AAGCTTTTTTGAGACTACTGAACACT S1255X;L synt R T(15)TATAACAAAGTAATCTTCCCTGATCC 3849 ϩ 4AϾG synt F T(15)GGATTTGAACACTGCTTGCTTTGTTA 3849 ϩ 4AϾG synt R T(15)CCACCCTCTGGCCAGGACTTATTGAG 3850 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AGTGGGCCTCTTGGGAAGAACTGGAT 3850 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTATAAGGTAAAAGTGATGGGATCAC 3905insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTGAGACTACTGAACACTGAA 3905insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAAGCTGATAACAAAGTACTCT 3876delA synt F T(15)CGGGAAGAGTACTTTGTTATCAGCTT 3876delA synt R T(15)CGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAAGAGGCCCA G1244V synt F T(15)TAAGAACTGGATCAGGGAAGAGTACT G1244V synt R T(15)ACCAAGAGGCCCACCTATAAGGTAAA G1249E synt F T(15)AGAAGAGTACTTTGTTATCAGCTTTT G1249E synt R T(15)TCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAAGAGGCC S1251N synt F T(15)ATACTTTGTTATCAGCTTTTTTGAGACTACTG S1251N synt R T(15)TTCTTCCCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAA S1252P synt F T(15)CCTTTGTTATCAGCTTTTTTGAGACT S1252P synt R T(15)GACTCTTCCCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCC D1270N synt F T(15)AATGGTGTGTCTTGGGATTCAATAAC D1270N synt R T(15)TGATCTGGATTTCTCCTTCAGTGTTC W1282R synt F T(15)CGGAGGAAAGCCTTTGGAGTGATACC W1282R synt R T(15)GCTGTTGCAAAGTTATTGAATCCCAA R1283K synt F T(15)AGAAAGCCTTTGGAGTGATACCACAG R1283K synt R T(15)TTCCACTGTTGCAAAGTTATTGAATC 4005 ϩ 1GϾA synt F T(15)ATGAGCAAAAGGACTTAGCCAGAAAA 4005 ϩ 1GϾA synt R T(15)TCTGTGGTATCACTCCAAAGGCTTTC 4010del4 synt F T(15)GTATTTTTTCTGGAACATTTAGAAAAAACTTGG 4010del4 synt R T(15)AAAATACTTTCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAA 4016insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTCTGGAACATTTAGAAAAAACTTGG 4016insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAATAAATACTTTCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGA CFTRdele21 synt F T(15)TAGGTAAGGCTGCTAACTGAAATGAT CFTRdele21 synt R T(15)CCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAAGAAAGTATG 4382delA synt F T(15)GAGAGAACAAAGTGCGGCAGTACGAT 4382delA synt R T(15)CTCTATGACCTATGGAAATGGCTGTT Bold, mutation allele of interest; bold and italicized, modified nucleotide.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 16049310:150:7846
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 16049310:150:7891
status: NEW[hide] High heterogeneity of CFTR mutations and unexpecte... J Cyst Fibros. 2004 Dec;3(4):265-72. des Georges M, Guittard C, Altieri JP, Templin C, Sarles J, Sarda P, Claustres M
High heterogeneity of CFTR mutations and unexpected low incidence of cystic fibrosis in the Mediterranean France.
J Cyst Fibros. 2004 Dec;3(4):265-72., [PMID:15698946]
Abstract [show]
In this report, we present updated spectrum and frequency of mutations of the CFTR gene that are responsible for cystic fibrosis (CF) in Languedoc-Roussillon (L-R), the southwestern part of France. A total of 75 different mutations were identified by DGGE in 215 families, accounting for 97.6% of CF genes and generating 88 different mutational genotypes. The frequency of p.F508del was 60.23% in L-R versus 67.18% in the whole country and only five other mutations (p.G542X, p.N1303K, p.R334W, c.1717-1G>A, c.711+1G>T) had a frequency higher than 1%. The mutations were scattered over 20 exons or their border. This sample representing only 5.7% of French CF patients contributed to 24% of CFTR mutations reported in France. This is one of the highest molecular allelic heterogeneity reported so far in CF. We also present the result of a neonatal screening program based on a two-tiered approach "IRT/20 mutations/IRT" analysis on blood spots, implemented in France with the aim to improve survival and quality of life of patients diagnosed before clinical onset. This 18-month pilot project showed an unexpected low incidence of CF (1/8885) in South of France, with only six CF children detected among 43,489 neonates born in L-R, and 13 among 125,339 neonates born in Provence-Alpes-Cote-d'Azur (PACA).
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
68 of chromosomes (frequency %) p.M1V 1 1 (0.23) p.M1K 1 1 (0.23) c.300delA 3 1 (0.23) p.P67L 3 1 (0.23) c.359insT 3 1 (0.23) p.G85E 3 3 (0.70) c.394delTT 3 1 (0.23) p.Q98R 4 1 (0.23) p.R117H 4 2 (0.47) p.Y122X 4 2 (0.47) p.Y161N 4 1 (0.23) c.621+1GNT intron 4 1 (0.23) c.621+2TNG intron 4 1 (0.23) p.I175V 5 2 (0.47) c.711+1GNT intron 5 5 (1.16) p.L206W 6 3 (0.70) p.Q220X 6 1 (0.23) p.L227R 6 1 (0.23) c.1078delT 7 2 (0.47) p.R334W 7 7 (1.63) p.R347P 7 2 (0.47) c.1215delG 7 1 (0.23) c.T5 intron 8 1 (0.23) p.D443Y 9 1 (0.23) p.I506T 10 1 (0.23) p.I507del 10 4 (0.93) p.F508del 10 259 (60.23) p.F508C 10 1 (0.23) c.1677delTA 10 1 (0.23) c.1717-8GNA intron 10 1 (0.23) c.1717-1GNA intron 10 6 (1.40) p.G542X 11 23 (5.35) p.S549R 11 1 (0.23) p.G551D 11 2 (0.47) p.R553X 11 1 (0.23) c1811+1.6kbANG intron 11 4 (0.93) c.1812-1GNA intron 11 1 (0.23) p.T582I 12 1 (0.23) p.E585X 12 2 (0,47) c.1898+1GNA intron 12 1 (0.23) [c.1898+5GNA ;p.E725K] intron 12 1 (0.23) c.1898+73TNG intron 12 1 (0.23) c.2183AANG 13 4 (0.93) c.2184insA 13 1 (0.23) p.K710X 13 4 (0.93) c.2423delG 13 1 (0.23) p.S776X 13 1 (0.23) c.2493ins8 13 1 (0.23) p.R792X 13 1 (0.23) p.K830X 13 1 (0.23) p.D836Y 14a 1 (0.23) p.W846X1 14a 1 (0.23) c.2711delT 14a 1 (0.23) c.2789+5GNA intron 14b 3 (0.70) p.S945L 15 3 (0.70) p.D993Y 16 1 (0.23) c.3129del4 17a 1 (0.23) c.3195del6 17a 1 (0.23) c.3272-26ANG intron 17a 1 (0.23) [c.3395insA ;pI148T] 17b/4 1 (0,23) p.Y1092X 17b 3 (0.70) Table 1 (continued) Mutation Location exon/intron No.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15698946:68:1037
status: NEW83 Table 2 Genotypes identified by newborn screening in 19 affected babies IRT (ng/ml) Genotypes 118 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]a 163 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]a N130 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]b N130 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]b N130 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]b 155 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]a 166 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]a 109 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]a 110 [p.F508del]+[p.F508del]a 136 [p.F508del]+[c.3007delG]a 160 [p.F508del]+[c.2622+1GNA]a 129 [p.F508del]+[c.3850-1GNA]a 151 [p.G542X]+[c.2380del8]a 131 [c.1078delT]+[p.K710X]a N130 [p.I507del]+[p.R334W]b 75 [p.G542X]+[p.R117H ;c1342-6 T7]b MI [p.E1104X]+[p.E1104X]b 84 [p.R117H; c1342-6 T7]+[p.R117H; c1342-6 T7]a 99 [c.2183AANG]+[p.Q220X]a IRT: Immunoreactive trypsinogen (cutoff: 65 ng/ml).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15698946:83:498
status: NEW87 M. des Georges et al. / Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 3 (2004) 265-272268 in trans of p.G542X, p.K710X in trans of c.1078delT and p.Q220X in trans of c.2183AANG (Table 2).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15698946:87:23
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 15698946:87:95
status: NEW[hide] Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and ... Hum Mutat. 2000;16(2):143-56. Claustres M, Guittard C, Bozon D, Chevalier F, Verlingue C, Ferec C, Girodon E, Cazeneuve C, Bienvenu T, Lalau G, Dumur V, Feldmann D, Bieth E, Blayau M, Clavel C, Creveaux I, Malinge MC, Monnier N, Malzac P, Mittre H, Chomel JC, Bonnefont JP, Iron A, Chery M, Georges MD
Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and in congenital absence of the vas deferens in France.
Hum Mutat. 2000;16(2):143-56., [PMID:10923036]
Abstract [show]
We have collated the results of cystic fibrosis (CF) mutation analysis conducted in 19 laboratories in France. We have analyzed 7, 420 CF alleles, demonstrating a total of 310 different mutations including 24 not reported previously, accounting for 93.56% of CF genes. The most common were F508del (67.18%; range 61-80), G542X (2.86%; range 1-6.7%), N1303K (2.10%; range 0.75-4.6%), and 1717-1G>A (1.31%; range 0-2.8%). Only 11 mutations had relative frequencies >0. 4%, 140 mutations were found on a small number of CF alleles (from 29 to two), and 154 were unique. These data show a clear geographical and/or ethnic variation in the distribution of the most common CF mutations. This spectrum of CF mutations, the largest ever reported in one country, has generated 481 different genotypes. We also investigated a cohort of 800 French men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and identified a total of 137 different CFTR mutations. Screening for the most common CF defects in addition to assessment for IVS8-5T allowed us to detect two mutations in 47.63% and one in 24.63% of CBAVD patients. In a subset of 327 CBAVD men who were more extensively investigated through the scanning of coding/flanking sequences, 516 of 654 (78. 90%) alleles were identified, with 15.90% and 70.95% of patients carrying one or two mutations, respectively, and only 13.15% without any detectable CFTR abnormality. The distribution of genotypes, classified according to the expected effect of their mutations on CFTR protein, clearly differed between both populations. CF patients had two severe mutations (87.77%) or one severe and one mild/variable mutation (11.33%), whereas CBAVD men had either a severe and a mild/variable (87.89%) or two mild/variable (11.57%) mutations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
103 b 3905insT, 1811+1.6kbA>G, S945L, S1251N, Y122X, 2711delT, R117H, E60X, 2184insA, E585X, L558S, S1235R, D1152H, K710X, Q493X, A455E, G178R, I148T, 574delA.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 10923036:103:112
status: NEW[hide] Genetic findings in congenital bilateral aplasia o... Hum Mutat. 1998;11(6):480. de Meeus A, Guittard C, Desgeorges M, Carles S, Demaille J, Claustres M
Genetic findings in congenital bilateral aplasia of vas deferens patients and identification of six novel mutatations. Mutations in brief no. 138. Online.
Hum Mutat. 1998;11(6):480., [PMID:10200050]
Abstract [show]
Congential bilateral aplasia of vas deferens (CBAVD), a form of male sterility, has been suggested to represent a "genital" form of cystic fibrosis (CF), as mutations in the CFTR gene have been identified in most patients with this condition. Interestingly, the 5T allele in intron 8 appeared to be the most frequent mutation associated with CBAVD. However, the molecular basis of CBAVD is not completely understood. We have analysed the complete coding and flanking CFTR sequences by PCR-DGGE in 64 men with CBAVD from southern France with the aim to list any sequence alteration. Fourty-two of the 64 patients (65.6%) had mutations on both copies of the CFTR gene, including one patient with two mutations in the same copy (DF508 + A1067T). The 5T allele was present in 21/64 cases (33%). Six of the 28 different mutations identified in this study had never been described previously, and appeared to be specific to CBAVD (P111L, M244K, A1364V, G544V, 2896insAG,-33G->A).
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
83 Phenotype CFTRamutations Intron 8, Poly(T) tract 1 3 crisis of acute pancreatitis F508 / L206W 9/7 2 F508 / L206W 9/9 3 frequent bronchitis F508 / R347H 9/9 4 F508 / R347H 9/9 5 F508 / M244K 9/7 6 F508 / A1364V 9/7 7 F508 / D1152H 9/7 8 chronic sinusitis and bronchitis F508 / D1152H 9/7 9 F508 / R117H 9/7 10 F508 / R117H 9/7 11 F508 / M952I 9/7 12 D443Y / G542X 7/9 13 D443Y / G542X 7/9 14 2184delA / D443Y 7/7 15 2184delA / D443Y 7/7 16 R347H / D443Y 9/7 17 seminal vesicles agenesia R117H / G1349D 7/7 18 R117H / G1244E 7/7 19 N1303K / P111L 9/7 20 chronic sinusitis, nasal polyps W1282X / D1152H 7/7 21 chronic sinusitis R347H / Y1092X 7/7 22 seminal vesicles agnesia 297-3C-GTT / 4279insA 7/7 23 G544V / F508C 7/7 24 D1152H / 2896insAG 7-9 25 F508 / - 9/5 26 F508 / - 9/5 27 F508 / - 9/5 28 F508 / - 9/5 29 F508 / - 9/5 30 chronic sinusitis, bronchitis F508 / - 9/5 31 sinusitis and allergy F508 / - 9/5 32 allergy F508 / - 9/5 33 F508 / - 9/5 34 F508 / - 9/5 35 F508 / - 9/5 36 F508 / - 9/5 37 bronchitis, asthma F508 / - 9/5 38 chronic sinusitis F508+A1067T / - 9/5 39 chronic sinusitis D1152H / - 7/5 40 2184delA / - 7/5 41 R764X / - 7/5 42 711+1G-GTT / - 7/5 43 F508 / - 9/7 44 F508 / - 9/7 45 F508 / - 9/7 46 F508 / - 9/9 47 R553X / - 7/7 48 -33G-GTA / - 7/7 49 K710X / - 7/7 50 - / - 5/5 51 - / - 5/7 52 - / - 5/7 53 - / - 7/7 54 - / - 7/7 55 - / - 7/7 56 - / - 7/7 57 - / - 7/7 58 - / - 7/7 59 - / - 7/7 60 - / - 7/7 61 - / - 7/9 62 - / - 7/9 63 NIDDb - / - 7/9 64 - / - 7/9 a : Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator gene b : Non Insulino-Dependant Diabetis References Anguiano A, Oates RD, Amos JA, Dean M, Gerrard B, Stewart C, Maher TA, White MB, Milunsky A (1992) Congenital absence of the vas deferens: a primarily genital form of cystic fibrosis.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 10200050:83:1281
status: NEW[hide] High heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis in Spanish ... Hum Genet. 1997 Dec;101(3):365-70. Casals T, Ramos MD, Gimenez J, Larriba S, Nunes V, Estivill X
High heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis in Spanish families: 75 mutations account for 90% of chromosomes.
Hum Genet. 1997 Dec;101(3):365-70., [PMID:9439669]
Abstract [show]
We have analyzed 640 Spanish cystic fibrosis (CF) families for mutations in the CFTR gene by direct mutation analysis, microsatellite haplotypes, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, single-strand conformation analysis and direct sequencing. Seventy-five mutations account for 90.2% of CF chromosomes. Among these we have detected seven novel CFTR mutations, including four missense (G85V, T582R, R851L and F1074L), two nonsense (E692X and Q1281X) and one splice site mutation (711+3A-->T). Three variants, two in intronic regions (406-112A/T and 3850-129T/C) and one in the coding region (741C/T) were also identified. Mutations G85V, T582R, R851L, E692X and Q1281X are severe, with lung and pancreatic involvement; 711+3A-->T could be responsible for a pancreatic sufficiency/insufficiency variable phenotype; and F1074L was associated with a mild phenotype. These data demonstrate the highest molecular heterogeneity reported so far in CF, indicating that a wide mutation screening is necessary to characterize 90% of the Spanish CF alleles.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
33 Eight mutations have frequencies 366 Table 1 Seventy-five CFTR mutations identified in 640 Spanish families with cystic fibrosis (CF) Mutation Exon/intron CF alleles % ∆F508 E.10 681 53.20 G542X E.11 108 8.43 N1303K E.21 34 2.65 1811+1.6kbA→Ga I.11 24 1.87 711+1G→T I.5 22 1.71 R1162Xa E.19 21 1.64 R334Wa E.7 21 1.64 R1066C E.17b 14 1.09 1609delCAa E.10 13 1.01 Q890X E.15 13 1.01 G85E E.3 12 0.94 712-1G→Ta I.5 11 0.86 2789+5G→A I.14b 11 0.86 ∆I507 E.10 10 0.78 W1282X E.20 10 0.78 2869insGa E.15 9 0.70 L206W E.6a 7 0.54 R709X E.13 7 0.54 621+1G→T I.4 6 0.47 3272-26A→G I.17a 6 0.47 R347H E.7 5 0.39 2183AA→G E.13 5 0.39 K710X E.13 5 0.39 2176insC E.13 5 0.39 3849+10kbC→T I.19 5 0.39 P205Sa E.6a 4 0.31 1078delT E.7 4 0.31 R553X E.11 4 0.31 G551D E.11 4 0.31 1812-1G→Aa I.11 4 0.31 CFdel#1a E.4-7/11-18 4 0.31 V232D E.6a 3 0.23 936delTAa E.6b 3 0.23 1717-8G→A I.10 3 0.23 1949del84 E.13 3 0.23 W1089X E.17b 3 0.23 R347P E.7 3 0.23 del E.3a E.3 2 0.16 R117H E.4 2 0.16 L558S E.11 2 0.16 A561E E.12 2 0.16 2603delT E.13 2 0.16 Y1092X E.17b 2 0.16 Q1100Pa E.17b 2 0.16 M1101K E.17b 2 0.16 delE.19a E.19 2 0.16 G1244E E.20 2 0.16 P5La E.1 1 0.08 Q30Xa E.2 1 0.08 G85Va E.3 1 0.08 E92Ka E.4 1 0.08 A120Ta E.4 1 0.08 I148T E.4 1 0.08 711+3A→Ta I.5 1 0.08 H199Y E.6a 1 0.08 875+1G→A I.6a 1 0.08 Table 1 (continued) Mutation Exon/intron CF alleles % 1717-1G→A I.10 1 0.08 L571S E.12 1 0.08 T582Ra E.12 1 0.08 E585X E.12 1 0.08 1898+3A→G I.12 1 0.08 G673X E.13 1 0.08 E692Xa E.13 1 0.08 R851X E.14a 1 0.08 R851La E.14a 1 0.08 A1006E E.17a 1 0.08 L1065Ra E.17b 1 0.08 F1074La E.17b 1 0.08 R1158X E.19 1 0.08 3667del4a E.19 1 0.08 3860ins31a E.20 1 0.08 3905insT E.20 1 0.08 4005+1G→A I.20 1 0.08 Q1281Xa E.20 1 0.08 Q1313X E.21 1 0.08 Known mutations (75) 1155 90.23 Unknown mutations 125 9.77 a Mutations discovered by the CF group of the Medical and Molecular Genetics Centre - IRO, Barcelona, Spain that range between 0.5% and 0.9%, representing 6.0% of the CF chromosomes.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 9439669:33:687
status: NEW80 368 Fig.2 a Single-strand conformation analysis of exon 13a of the CFTR gene with three abnormal patterns: lane 4 (1949del84), lane 5 (the new mutation E692X) and lane 6 (K710X).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 9439669:80:171
status: NEW[hide] Sensitivity of the denaturing gradient gel electro... Hum Mutat. 1997;9(2):136-47. Macek M Jr, Mercier B, Mackova A, Miller PW, Hamosh A, Ferec C, Cutting GR
Sensitivity of the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis technique in detection of known mutations and novel Asian mutations in the CFTR gene.
Hum Mutat. 1997;9(2):136-47., [PMID:9067754]
Abstract [show]
More than 500 mutations have been identified in the CFTR gene, making it an excellent system for testing mutation scanning techniques. To assess the sensitivity of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), we collected a representative group of 202 CFTR mutations. All mutations analyzed were detected by scanning methods other than the DGGE approach evaluated in this study. DGGE analysis was performed on 24 of the 27 exons and their flanking splice site sequences. After optimization, 201 of the 202 control samples produced an altered migration pattern in the region in which an alteration occurred. The remaining sample was sequenced and found not to have the reported mutation. The ability of DGGE to identify novel mutations was evaluated in three Asian CF patients with four unknown CF alleles. Three novel Asian mutations were detected-K166E, L568X, and 3121-2 A-->G (in homozygosity)-accounting for all CF alleles. These results indicate that an optimized DGGE scanning strategy is highly sensitive and specific and can detect 100% of mutations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
105 Lane 1, K710X mutation; lanes 2,3,5,7,8, wild-type samples.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 9067754:105:8
status: NEW[hide] Haplotype analysis of 94 cystic fibrosis mutations... Hum Mutat. 1996;8(2):149-59. Morral N, Dork T, Llevadot R, Dziadek V, Mercier B, Ferec C, Costes B, Girodon E, Zielenski J, Tsui LC, Tummler B, Estivill X
Haplotype analysis of 94 cystic fibrosis mutations with seven polymorphic CFTR DNA markers.
Hum Mutat. 1996;8(2):149-59., [PMID:8844213]
Abstract [show]
We have analyzed 416 normal and 467 chromosomes carrying 94 different cystic fibrosis (CF) mutations with polymorphic genetic markers J44, IVS6aGATT, IVS8CA, T854, IVS17BTA, IVS17BCA, and TUB20. The number of mutations found with each haplotype is proportional to its frequency among normal chromosomes, suggesting that there is no preferential haplotype in which mutations arise and thus excluding possible selection for specific haplotypes. While many common mutations in the worldwide CF population showed absence of haplotype variation, indicating their recent origins, some mutations were associated with more than one haplotype. The most common CF mutations, delta F508, G542X, and N1303K, showed the highest number of slippage events at microsatellites, suggesting that they are the most ancient CF mutations. Recurrence was probably the case for 9 CF mutations (R117H, H199Y, R347YH, R347P, L558S, 2184insA, 3272-26A-->G, R1162X, and 3849 + 10kbC-->T). This analysis of 94 CF mutations should facilitate mutation screening and provides useful data for studies on population genetics of CF.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
105 CFTR Haplotypes for Diallelic and Multiallelic DNA Markers for 94 CF Mutations" J44-GATT- 8CA-17BTA- No. of T854-TUB20 17BCA Mutation chromosomes % Normal Laboratory Reference 2-7-1-2 17-47-13 (55.4%) 17-46-13 17-45-13 17-34-13 17-32-13 17-31-14 17-31-13 17-29-14 17-28-13 16-48-13 16-46-14 16-46-13 16-45-13 16-44-13 16-35-13 16-33-13 16-32-13 16-31-14 16-31-13 16-30-13 16-29-13 16-26-13 16-25-13 16-24-13 14-31-13 1-7-2-1 17-7-17 (16.8%) R334W R334W 3860ins31 G1244E R1162X R1162X R1162X G91R MllOlK R347P R334W R117C E92K 3849+lOkbC+T 3293delA 1811+1.6kb A-tG 1811+1.6kb A-tG 2184insA P205S 3659delC G673X 11005R I336K W58S R347P W846X 405+1-A G178R 3905insT R1162X R347H 3100insA E60X 1078delT 4005+1-A K710X 1677delTA H199Y 3601-2AjG 3850-3T+G 3272-26A-tG 3850-1-A 1812-1-A R117H L1059X S492F Y1092X Y569H 3732delA C866Y 711+1G+T 711+1-T G85E 1949del84 2789+5-A H1085R W1282X R1066C 2043delG V456F 2 1 1 1 2 1 6 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 19 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 3 6 3 5 1 13 2 1 1 - 0.48 0.48 - - - 0.24 - - - 2.65 2.40 1.93 2.65 1.68 2.65 0.72 13.94 13.46 1.93 - 0.72 0.24 3.37 - b b fP fP fP t b,fb.fP h fb t h t h h fP fP b.h b h h b h h h h h fb fb,fP.t fP fP fP9t fP b t fPh b h fb b.fb,h fb*fP b,fP h h t h fb fb,fp,h.t fP fP fb t b.fP,t b,fb,h,t b f b h h fb b,fb.fP,h fP h h Gasparini et al. (1991b) Chilldn et al. (1993a) Devoto et al. (1991) Gasparini et al. (1991b) Dork et al. (1993a) Guillermit et al. (1993) Zielenski et al. (1993) Dean et al. (1990) Dork et al. (1994a) Nunes et al. (1993) Highsmith et al. (1994) Ghanem et al. (1994) Chilldn et al. (1995) Dork et al. (1994a) Dork et al. (1993a) Chilldn et al. (1993b) Kerem et al. (1990) Dork et al. (1994a) Dork et al. (1994a) Cuppenset al. (1993) Fanen et al. (1992) Maggio et al. (personal communication) Audrezet et al. (1993) Vidaud et al. (1990) Dork et al. (1993b) Zielenski et al. (1991a) Chilldn et al. (1994b) Malik et al. (personal communication) Cremonesi et at.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 8844213:105:708
status: NEW[hide] Mutations in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients ... N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 1;332(22):1475-80. Chillon M, Casals T, Mercier B, Bassas L, Lissens W, Silber S, Romey MC, Ruiz-Romero J, Verlingue C, Claustres M, et al.
Mutations in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens.
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 1;332(22):1475-80., [PMID:7739684]
Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) is a form of male infertility in which mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene have been identified. The molecular basis of CBAVD is not completely understood. Although patients with cystic fibrosis have mutations in both copies of the CFTR gene, most patients with CBAVD have mutations in only one copy of the gene. METHODS: To investigate CBAVD at the molecular level, we have characterized the mutations in the CFTR gene in 102 patients with this condition. None had clinical manifestations of cystic fibrosis. We also analyzed a DNA variant (the 5T allele) in a noncoding region of CFTR that causes reduced levels of the normal CFTR protein. Parents of patients with cystic fibrosis, patients with types of infertility other than CBAVD, and normal subjects were studied as controls. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 102 patients with CBAVD had mutations in both copies of the CFTR gene, and none of them had the 5T allele. Fifty-four patients had a mutation in one copy of CFTR, and 34 of them (63 percent) had the 5T allele in the other CFTR gene. In 29 patients no CFTR mutations were found, but 7 of them (24 percent) had the 5T allele. In contrast, the frequency of this allele in the general population was about 5 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with CBAVD have mutations in the CFTR gene. The combination of the 5T allele in one copy of the CFTR gene with a cystic fibrosis mutation in the other copy is the most common cause of CBAVD: The 5T allele mutation has a wide range of clinical presentations, occurring in patients with CBAVD or moderate forms of cystic fibrosis and in fertile men.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
119 Three other patients, 8, 12, and 14 years of age with the genotypes E585X/5T and K710X/5T (two were siblings), had a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis due to elevated concentrations of electrolytes in sweat (Ͼ60 mmol per liter) and episodes of dehydration, but no other clinical features.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 7739684:119:81
status: NEW[hide] A novel donor splice site in intron 11 of the CFTR... Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Mar;56(3):623-9. Chillon M, Dork T, Casals T, Gimenez J, Fonknechten N, Will K, Ramos D, Nunes V, Estivill X
A novel donor splice site in intron 11 of the CFTR gene, created by mutation 1811+1.6kbA-->G, produces a new exon: high frequency in Spanish cystic fibrosis chromosomes and association with severe phenotype.
Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Mar;56(3):623-9., [PMID:7534040]
Abstract [show]
mRNA analysis of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene in tissues of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients has allowed us to detect a cryptic exon. The new exon involves 49 base pairs between exons 11 and 12 and is due to a point mutation (1811+1.6kbA-->G) that creates a new donor splice site in intron 11. Semiquantitative mRNA analysis showed that 1811+1.6kbA-->G-mRNA was 5-10-fold less abundant than delta F508 mRNA. Mutation 1811+1.6kbA-->G was found in 21 Spanish and 1 German CF chromosomes, making it the fourth-most-frequent mutation (2%) in the Spanish population. Individuals with genotype delta F508/1811+1.6kbA-->G have only 1%-3% of normal CFTR mRNA. This loss of 97% of normal CFTR mRNA must be responsible for the pancreatic insufficiency and for the severe CF phenotype in these patients.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
125 of patients ...................... 17 3 82 Age (years) ...................... 9.1 ± 5.8 12 ± 5.3 7.8 ± 5.2 Age at diagnosis (years) ............... 2.8 ± 4.0 7.1 ± 5.2 2.2 ± 2.8 Sweat chloride (mmolIL) ............. 98 ± 11.7 100 ± 10 104.4 ± 15.7 FEV1 (% predicted)d .................... 65 ± 24.8 70.8 ± 12.8 74.8 ± 23.1 Shwachman score' ...................... 74.5 ± 12.3 86.6 ± 2.3 83.1 ± 11.8 Pancreatic sufficiency ................... 0/19 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 1/82 (1.2%) a A1507, AF508, 1609delCA, G542X, K710X, and N1303K.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 7534040:125:583
status: NEW124 of patients ...................... 17 3 82 Age (years) ...................... 9.1 &#b1; 5.8 12 &#b1; 5.3 7.8 &#b1; 5.2 Age at diagnosis (years) ............... 2.8 &#b1; 4.0 7.1 &#b1; 5.2 2.2 &#b1; 2.8 Sweat chloride (mmolIL) ............. 98 &#b1; 11.7 100 &#b1; 10 104.4 &#b1; 15.7 FEV1 (% predicted)d .................... 65 &#b1; 24.8 70.8 &#b1; 12.8 74.8 &#b1; 23.1 Shwachman score' ...................... 74.5 &#b1; 12.3 86.6 &#b1; 2.3 83.1 &#b1; 11.8 Pancreatic sufficiency ................... 0/19 (0%) 3/3 (100%) 1/82 (1.2%) a A1507, AF508, 1609delCA, G542X, K710X, and N1303K.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 7534040:124:568
status: NEW[hide] Analysis of the CFTR gene confirms the high geneti... Hum Genet. 1994 Apr;93(4):447-51. Chillon M, Casals T, Gimenez J, Ramos MD, Palacio A, Morral N, Estivill X, Nunes V
Analysis of the CFTR gene confirms the high genetic heterogeneity of the Spanish population: 43 mutations account for only 78% of CF chromosomes.
Hum Genet. 1994 Apr;93(4):447-51., [PMID:7513293]
Abstract [show]
We have analysed 972 unrelated Spanish cystic fibrosis patients for 70 known mutations. Analysis was performed on exons 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6a, 6b, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14a, 14b, 15, 16, 17b, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene using single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. The major mutation delta F508 accounts for 50.6% of CF chromosomes, whereas another 42 mutations account for 27.6% of CF chromosomes, with 21.8% of Spanish CF chromosomes remaining uncharacterized. At present, we have identified 36 mutations that have frequency of less than 1% and that are spread over 15 different exons. This indicates that, in the Spanish population, with the exception of delta F508 (50.6%) and G542X (8%), the mutations are not concentrated in a few exons of the gene nor are there any predominating mutations. This high degree of genetic heterogeneity is mainly a result of the different ethnic groups that have populated Spain and of the maintenance of separated population sets (Basques, Arab-Andalusian, Mediterranean, Canarian and Gallician). The high proportion of CF chromosomes still unidentified (21.8%) together with association analysis with intragenic markers suggest that at least 100 different mutations causing CF are present in our population.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
41 A Exon 13 4 0.41 621-1 G--~T Intron 4 3 0.31 P205S Exon 6a 3 0.31 936 del TA Exon 6b 3 0.31 1949 del 84 Exon 13 3 0.31 K710X Exon 13 3 0.31 CF del #1 Exon 4-7/11-18 3 0.31 L206W Exon 6a 2 0.20 R347H Exon 7 2 0.20 Y1092X Exon 17b 2 0.20 Q1100P Exon 17b 2 0.20 Q30X Exon 2 1 0.10 E92K Exon 4 1 0.10 A120T Exon 4 1 0.10 I148T Exon 4 1 0.10 H199Y Exon 6a 1 0.10 1078 del T Exon 7 1 0.10 1717-1 G--+A Intron 10 1 0.10 T582R Exon 12 1 0.10 E585X Exon 12 1 0.10 1898+3 A~---G Intron 12 1 0.10 W1098X Exon 17b 1 0.10 R1158X Exon 19 1 0.10 3667 del 4 Exon 19 1 0.10 3860 ins 31 Exon 20 1 0.10 3905 ins T Exon 20 1 0.10 Unknown 212 21.81 The Basque subset The Basques have a different genetic background with respect to other ethnic groups (Pancorbo et al. 1989) as they are the only pre-Indoeuropean group in Spain.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 7513293:41:119
status: NEW[hide] Retrospective study of the cystic fibrosis transme... Hum Genet. 1994 Apr;93(4):429-34. Verlingue C, Mercier B, Lecoq I, Audrezet MP, Laroche D, Travert G, Ferec C
Retrospective study of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations in Guthrie cards from a large cohort of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis.
Hum Genet. 1994 Apr;93(4):429-34., [PMID:7513292]
Abstract [show]
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene encodes a cAMP-activated chloride channel, and in individuals with both alleles of the gene mutated, symptoms of CF disease are manifest. With more than 300 mutations so far described in the gene the profile of mutant alleles in a population is specific to its ethnic origin. For an analysis with an unbiased recruitment of the CF alleles in neonates of similar origin (Normandy, France), we have retrospectively analyzed the Guthrie cards of affected newborns, diagnosed by the immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) assay. Analysis of the 27 exons of the CFTR gene using a GC clamp denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) assay has enabled us to identify over 96% of the mutated alleles. Two of these were novel mutations. We would like to propose this strategy as an efficient method of retrospective molecular genetic diagnosis that can be performed wherever Guthrie cards can be obtained. Knowledge of rare alleles could be a prerequisite for CF therapy in the future.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
69 1 Kerem et al. 1990 1 394 del TT 3 0.05 Claustres et al. 1993 1 E60X 3 0.05 unpublished data 1 621 + 1 G---~T intron 5 0.05 Zielenski et a1.1991 1 876 - 14 del 12 NT 6a 0.05 Audr6zet et a1.1993 1 Q493X 10 0.05 Kerem et al. 1990 1 1507 10 0.05 Kerem et al. 1990, Schwartz et al. 1991 1 1717 - 1 G---~A intron 10 0.05 Kerem et al. 1990, Guillermit et al. 1990 1 K710X 13 0.05 Fanen et al. 1992 1 L610S 13 0.05 This study 1 E83 IX 14a 0.05 This study 1 W846X 14a 0.05 Vidaud et al. 1990 1 $945L 15 0.05 Claustres et al. 1993 1 Y1092X 17b 0.05 unpublisheddata 1 3359 del CT 17b 0.05 Mercier et al. 1993 1 RI066C 17b 0.05 Fanen et al. 1992 1 W1204X 19 0.05 Costes et al. 1993 1 R1162X 19 0.05 Gasparini et al. 1991 1 W1282X 20 0.05 Vidaud et al. 1990 175 Identified 96.1 6 Unidentified 3.9 15 No blood left to perform the complete analysis 196 Total The affected child has a pancreatic insufficiency.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 7513292:69:360
status: NEW[hide] Analysis of the 27 exons and flanking regions of t... Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Aug;2(8):1209-13. Claustres M, Laussel M, Desgeorges M, Giansily M, Culard JF, Razakatsara G, Demaille J
Analysis of the 27 exons and flanking regions of the cystic fibrosis gene: 40 different mutations account for 91.2% of the mutant alleles in southern France.
Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Aug;2(8):1209-13., [PMID:7691344]
Abstract [show]
In order to characterize the non-delta F508 mutations that account for 36% of cystic fibrosis (CF) chromosomes in Southern France in a sample of 137 patients, we have systematically screened the entire coding region and adjacent sequences of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene by the single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique followed by direct sequencing of the mutant DNAs. We identified 13 novel mutations (9 reported in this paper) and 4 novel rare nucleotide sequence variations. Forty different mutations including delta F508, located in 15 exons, account for only 91.2% of mutants in a population originating from Southern France, in contrast with a recent report on the Celtic population of Brittany demonstrating that 90% of mutations can be detected with only three mutations. We present a very large spectrum of different CF mutations identified in a small geographical area.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
26 Mutations identified in a Southern french population mutation AF5O8 M1K 300delA P67L R74W G85E 394detTT 406-6 (T-C) Y122X I148T 621 + 1G-T 62/+2T-G L206W 1078deIT R334W R347H R347P AI507 1717-1G-A G542X R553X S549N G551D E585X 2184delA K710X R792X S945L Y1092X 3272-26A-G R1158X R1162X 3737delA 3659delC 11234V D1270N W1282X N13O3H N13O3K 4382delA Exon 10 1 3 3 3 3 3 intron 3 4 4 intron 4 intron 4 6a 7 7 7 7 10 intron 10 11 11 11 11 , 12 13 13 13 15 17b intron 17a 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 21 21 24 Amino acid change 3 bp deletion start-Lys at 1 frameshift Pro-Leu at67 Arg-Trp at 74 Gly-Glu at 85 frameshift splice mutation?
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 7691344:26:236
status: NEW[hide] Microsatellite haplotypes for cystic fibrosis: mut... Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Jul;2(7):1015-22. Morral N, Nunes V, Casals T, Chillon M, Gimenez J, Bertranpetit J, Estivill X
Microsatellite haplotypes for cystic fibrosis: mutation frameworks and evolutionary tracers.
Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Jul;2(7):1015-22., [PMID:7689896]
Abstract [show]
Highly informative intragenic microsatellite markers within the cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene allow the analysis of associations between specific mutations and haplotypes. We have analysed 440 Spanish CF families carrying 22 different CF mutations and have established haplotypes in 1,036 chromosomes for microsatellites IVS8CA, IVS17BTA and IVS17BCA. No new alleles were detected at the three CFTR microsatellites, in more than 3,000 meiosis analysed (estimated mutation rate of less than 3.3 x 10(-4)). The evolution of 16 haplotypes associated with the most common CF mutation, delta F508, and the low mutation rate at these microsatellite loci suggest that delta F508 originated within the 23-31-13 haplotype at least 53,000 years ago, very early in the history of the European population. The number of haplotype changes seen for two other common mutations, G542X (haplotype 23-33-13) and N1303K (23-31-13), suggests that they originated at least 35,000 years ago. Microsatellite allele variability associated with delta F508, G542X and N1303K demonstrates that slippage and mispairing is the main mechanism generating microsatellite alleles. In spite of the haplotype variability detected for these 3 common mutations, the association between haplotype and mutations is very strong. Mutations 1609delCA, 3667del4, delta I507 and G551D are all associated with haplotype 16-7-17, which has a frequency of 14.5% in normal chromosomes. 5 haplotypes bearing specific CF mutations were not found in normal chromosomes. Haplotype 16-46-13 is strongly associated with CF mutations E92K and 3601-111G-->C. About 23% of CF chromosomes with unknown mutations show significant linkage disequilibrium for microsatellite haplotypes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
58 CF mutations identified in the Spanish population Mutation AF5O8 G542X N13O3K 36O1-111G-C R1162X 1609delCA 2869insG W1282X AI507 G551D 1949del84 CF50KBdel tt 1 K710X 621 + 1G-T R334W 1078delT E92K 3667deM R1158X A120T I148T 386Oins31 Unknown Total N 437 73 18 18 14 8 6 6 5 4 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 271 880 % 49.7 8.3 2.1 2.1 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 7689896:58:160
status: NEW138 CFTR mjcrosatellhe haplotypes for 19 CF mutations Haplotypes 8CA 16 17 23 14 16 17 16 16 16 17 17 16 21 22 17BTA 7 7 7 31 31 31 44 43 46 45 46 - 31 30 17BCA 17 17 17 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 - 13 13 Mutation 1609delCA (0.9) AI507 (0.6) G551D (0.5) 3667del4 (0.1) W1282X (0.7) R1158X(0.1) I148T (0.1) 1949del84 (0.3) K710X (0.3) 1078ddT (0.1) R1162X (1.6) 2869insG (0.7) 3601-111G-C (2.1) E92K (0.1) 3860ins31 (0.1) R334W (0.2) CF50KBdel#l (0.3) Chromosomes CF Number 8 5 4 1 5 1 1 3 2 1 7 5 1 18 1 1 2 3 621 + 1G-T (0.2)1 A120T (0.1) 1 % Normal 14.5 2.9 0.6 - 10.0 1.1 1.9 - 3.0 - 0.2 - 0.4 - CF cystic fibrosis; ( ) frequency of mutation in the population.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 7689896:138:315
status: NEW[hide] Molecular characterization of cystic fibrosis: 16 ... Genomics. 1992 Jul;13(3):770-6. Fanen P, Ghanem N, Vidaud M, Besmond C, Martin J, Costes B, Plassa F, Goossens M
Molecular characterization of cystic fibrosis: 16 novel mutations identified by analysis of the whole cystic fibrosis conductance transmembrane regulator (CFTR) coding regions and splice site junctions.
Genomics. 1992 Jul;13(3):770-6., [PMID:1379210]
Abstract [show]
The spectrum of cystic fibrosis (CF) mutations was determined in 105 patients by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to screen the entire coding regions and adjacent cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene sequences. The nucleotide substitutions detected included 16 novel mutations, 11 previously described defects, and 11 nucleotide sequence polymorphisms. Among the novel mutations, 6 were of the missense type, 4 were nonsense mutations, 4 were frameshift defects, and 2 affected mRNA splicing. The mutations involved all the CFTR domains, including the R domain. Of the 61 non-delta F508 CF chromosomes studied, mutations were found on 36 (59%), raising the proportion of CF alleles characterized in our patient cohort to 88%. Given the efficacy of the screening method used, the remaining uncharacterized mutations probably lie in DNA sequences outside the regions studied, e.g., upstream-promoter sequences, the large introns, or putative regulatory regions. Our results further document the highly heterogeneous nature of CF mutations and provide the information required for DNA-based genetic testing.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
63 In addition to K710X nonsense and 2034delG frameshift (disease-causing) defects, two missense mutations were detected.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 1379210:63:15
status: NEW67 T C225R R334W G542X G551D 1717-l G -+ A K710X Lys -b Stop at 710 A-+Tat2260 G628R Gly + Arg at 628 G+Aat2014 2043 delG Frameshift 1 -bp deletion W846X Trp --, Stop at 846 G-+Aat2670 2789 + 5 G - A Splice mutation G + A at 2789 + 5 Y913C Tyr --) Cys at 913 A-,Gat2870 3272-26 A -+ G Splice mutation A + G at 3272-26 W1063X Trp -+ Stop at 1063 G+Aat3321 R1066C Arg + Cys at 1066 C+Tat3328 Y1092X Tyr + Stop at 1092 C + A at 3408 3659delC Frameshift l-bp deletion 19 3732deIA Frameshift 1-bp deletion 19 K1200E Lys --, Glu at 1200 A+Gat3730 19 R1162X Arg - Stop at 1162 C + T at 3616 19 W1282X Trp + Stop at 1282 G+Aat3978 20 N1303K Asn -+ Lys at 1303 C -+ G at 4041 21 4374 + 1 G + A Splice mutation G+Aat4374+ 1 Intron 23 Asp + Gly at 44 Frameshift Frameshift Gly + Arg at 178 Splice mutation Cys + Arg at 225 Arg + Trp at 334 Gly + Stop at 542 Gly + Asp at 551 Splice mutation A+Gat263 2 2bp deletion 2 1-bp deletion 4 G --, A at 664 5 G + Tat 711 + 1 Intron 5 T+Cat805 6a C + Tat 1132 7 G + T at 1756 11 G+Aat1784 11 G + A at 1717-l Intron 10 Haplotype Restriction (XV-2c, KM-19) site change Reference A B A A or C A D A B, D B B Hinfl(-) - - - - SecI (+) MspI (6) - Mb01 (+) - 13 13 13 14a Intron 14 b 15 Intron 17a 17b 17b 17b C A B A D A A C B C XmnI (-) - - - MnlI (-) - - This study This study This study Zielenski et al. (1991) Zielenski et al. (1991) This study Gasparini et al. (1991b) Kerem et al. (1990) Cutting et al. (1990) Kerem et al. (1990); Guillermit et al. (1990) This study This study This study Vidaud et al. (1990a) Highsmith et al. (1990) Vidaud et al. (1990a) This study This study This study Bozon (personal communication) Kerem et al. (1990) This study Together with 3732delA Gasparini et al. (1991b) Vidaud et al. (1990a) Osborne et al. (1991) This study Note. Previously undescribed mutations are shown in bold type.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 1379210:67:40
status: NEW101 Similarly, other substitutions of the G-C (or A-T) type were detected, e.g., the D44V (Fig. l), K710X, and G576A substitutions (Tables 2 and 3).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 1379210:101:96
status: NEW[hide] CFTR gene analysis in Latin American CF patients: ... J Cyst Fibros. 2007 May;6(3):194-208. Epub 2006 Sep 11. Perez MM, Luna MC, Pivetta OH, Keyeux G
CFTR gene analysis in Latin American CF patients: heterogeneous origin and distribution of mutations across the continent.
J Cyst Fibros. 2007 May;6(3):194-208. Epub 2006 Sep 11., [PMID:16963320]
Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is the most prevalent Mendelian disorder in European populations. Despite the fact that many Latin American countries have a predominant population of European-descent, CF has remained an unknown entity until recently. Argentina and Brazil have detected the first patients around three decades ago, but in most countries this disease has remained poorly documented. Recently, other countries started publishing their results. METHODS: We present a compilation and statistical analysis of the data obtained in 10 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Mexico, Uruguay and Venezuela), with a total of 4354 unrelated CF chromosomes studied. RESULTS: The results show a wide distribution of 89 different mutations, with a maximum coverage of 62.8% of CF chromosomes/alleles in the patient's sample. Most of these mutations are frequent in Spain, Italy, and Portugal, consistent with the origin of the European settlers. A few African mutations are also present in those countries which were part of the slave trade. New mutations were also found, possibly originating in America. CONCLUSION: The profile of mutations in the CFTR gene, which reflects the heterogeneity of its inhabitants, shows the complexity of the molecular diagnosis of CF mutations in most of the Latin American countries.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
78 At least another 38 mutations have been searched for, but none of them were found in the CF patients from Latin America: p.E60X, p.Y122X, p.G178R, p.G330X, p.R347H, p.R352Q, p.S364P, p.A455E, p.Q493X, p.V520F, p.C524X, p.R560T, p.Y563D, p.P574H, p.K710X, p.Q890X, p. R1158X, p.S1196X, p.S1255X, p.D1270N, p.W1310X, p. W1316X, c.405+1G-A, c.444delA, c.556delA, c.574delA, c.1677delTA, c.2043delG, c.2307insA, c.2909delT, c.3120G-A, c.3358delAC, c.3662delA, c.3750delAG, c.3791delC, c.3821delT, c.3849+4A-G, c.3905insT.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 16963320:78:248
status: NEW[hide] Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a North Ameri... Genet Med. 2014 Jul;16(7):539-46. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.188. Epub 2013 Dec 19. Zvereff VV, Faruki H, Edwards M, Friedman KJ
Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a North American population.
Genet Med. 2014 Jul;16(7):539-46. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.188. Epub 2013 Dec 19., [PMID:24357848]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the mutation frequency distribution for a 32-mutation panel and a 69-mutation panel used for cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Further aims of the study were to examine the race-specific detection rates provided by both panels and to assess the performance of extended panels in large-scale, population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Although genetic screening for the most common CFTR mutations allows detection of nearly 90% of cystic fibrosis carriers, the large number of other mutations, and their distribution within different ethnic groups, limits the utility of general population screening. METHODS: Patients referred for cystic fibrosis screening from January 2005 through December 2010 were tested using either a 32-mutation panel (n = 1,601,308 individuals) or a 69-mutation panel (n = 109,830). RESULTS: The carrier frequencies observed for the 69-mutation panel study population (1/36) and Caucasian (1/27) and African-American individuals (1/79) agree well with published cystic fibrosis carrier frequencies; however, a higher carrier frequency was observed for Hispanic-American individuals (1/48) using the 69-mutation panel as compared with the 32-mutation panel (1/69). The 69-mutation panel detected ~20% more mutations than the 32-mutation panel for both African-American and Hispanic-American individuals. CONCLUSION: Expanded panels using race-specific variants can improve cystic fibrosis carrier detection rates within specific populations. However, it is important that the pathogenicity and the relative frequency of these variants are confirmed.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
65 These were 1898+5G>T, 444delA, G330X, S364P, K710X, and S1196X.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 24357848:65:45
status: NEW80 The Table 3ߒ Frequency of 5T/7T/9T genotypes as a result of R117H reflex testing Poly-T alleles Number of detected alleles (%) CF32 panel CF69 panel 5T/5T 23 (0.44) 2 (0.73) 5T/7T 430 (8.27) 26 (9.49) 5T/9T 38 (0.73) 1 (0.37) 7T/7T 4,103 (78.93) 219 (79.92) 7T/9T 604 (11.61) 26 (9.49) 9T/9T 1 (0.02) 0 Total 5,198 (100) 274 (100) 394delTTd c.262_263delTT 3 0.10 G178Rd p.G178R 3 0.10 V520Fd p.V520F 3 0.10 2143delTd c.2012delT 2 0.06 935delAe c.803delA 2 0.06 A455Eb p.A455E 2 0.06 Q890Xd p.Q890X 2 0.06 S549Rd p.S549R 2 0.06 2869insGd c.2737insG 1 0.03 405ߙ+ߙ3A>Ce c.273ߙ+ߙ3A>C 1 0.03 G480Ce p.G480C 1 0.03 M1101Kd p.M1101K 1 0.03 Y122Xd p.Y122X 1 0.03 Total 3,088 100 a 1898ߙ+ߙ5G>Te , 444delA, G330X, S364Pe , K710X, and S1196X mutations were not detected in the target population.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 24357848:80:755
status: NEW[hide] Impact of heterozygote CFTR mutations in COPD pati... Respir Res. 2014 Feb 11;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-18. Raju SV, Tate JH, Peacock SK, Fang P, Oster RA, Dransfield MT, Rowe SM
Impact of heterozygote CFTR mutations in COPD patients with chronic bronchitis.
Respir Res. 2014 Feb 11;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-18., [PMID:24517344]
Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking causes Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S. CFTR ion transport dysfunction has been implicated in COPD pathogenesis, and is associated with chronic bronchitis. However, susceptibility to smoke induced lung injury is variable and the underlying genetic contributors remain unclear. We hypothesized that presence of CFTR mutation heterozygosity may alter susceptibility to cigarette smoke induced CFTR dysfunction. Consequently, COPD patients with chronic bronchitis may have a higher rate of CFTR mutations compared to the general population. METHODS: Primary human bronchial epithelial cells derived from F508del CFTR heterozygotes and mice with (CFTR+/-) and without (CFTR+/+) CFTR heterozygosity were exposed to whole cigarette smoke (WCS); CFTR-dependent ion transport was assessed by Ussing chamber electrophysiology and nasal potential difference measurements, respectively. Caucasians with COPD and chronic bronchitis, age 40 to 80 with FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and FEV1 < 60% predicted, were selected for genetic analysis from participants in the NIH COPD Clinical Research Network's Azithromycin for Prevention of Exacerbations of COPD in comparison to 32,900 Caucasian women who underwent prenatal genetic testing. Genetic analysis involved an allele-specific genotyping of 89 CFTR mutations. RESULTS: Exposure to WCS caused a pronounced reduction in CFTR activity in both CFTR (+/+) cells and F508del CFTR (+/-) cells; however, neither the degree of decrement (44.7% wild-type vs. 53.5% F508del heterozygous, P = NS) nor the residual CFTR activity were altered by CFTR heterozygosity. Similarly, WCS caused a marked reduction in CFTR activity measured by NPD in both wild type and CFTR heterozygous mice, but the severity of decrement (91.1% wild type vs. 47.7% CF heterozygous, P = NS) and the residual activity were not significantly affected by CFTR genetic status. Five of 127 (3.9%) COPD patients with chronic bronchitis were heterozygous for CFTR mutations which was not significantly different from controls (4.5%) (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of WCS induced reductions in CFTR activity was not affected by the presence of CFTR mutation heterozygosity. CFTR mutations do not increase the risk of COPD with chronic bronchitis. CFTR dysfunction due to smoking is primarily an acquired phenomenon and is not affected by the presence of congenital CFTR mutations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
81 As expected based on genotype-phenotype correlations in the disease [33], HBE cells derived from a F508del CFTR heterozygote had slightly lower CFTR activity at baseline than wild type monolayers as measured by Table 1 List of CFTR mutations analyzed F508del R117H 1717-1G > A R117C G85E R334W 1898 + 1G > A Y122X A455E R347P 2184delA G178R I507del R553X 2789 + 5G > A G314E G542X R560T 3120 + 1G > A G330X G551D W1282X 3659delC R347H N1303K 621 + 1G > T K710X 406-1G > A R1162X 711 + 1G > T E60X G480C R1066C W1089X V520F A559T S1196X Q1238X S1251N S1255X 663delT 935delA 1161delC 1288insTA 2184insA 2307insA 2711delT 2869insG R709X R764X R1158X 574delA Q493X 1898 + 5G > T 3905insT I506T 3849 + 10kbC > T 712-1G > T Q98R Q552X S549N 1078delT H199Y 444delA S549R (T > G) 2143delT P205S 2043delG 1811 + 1.6kbA > G 3272-26A > G L206W 3791delC Y1092X (C > G) 3199del6 F508C 2108delA Y1092X (C > A) D1152H V520I 3667del4 394delTT 3876delA M1101K 1677delTA W1098X (TGA) 1812-1G > A 4016insT 1609delCA 3171delC response to forskolin stimulation (49.3 &#b1; 11.5 bc;A/cm2 in CFTR (+/+) vs. 40.5 &#b1; 5.3 bc;A/cm2 in CFTR (+/-), although this was not statistically significant (Figure 1A,B).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 24517344:81:455
status: NEW[hide] Interference with ubiquitination in CFTR modifies ... Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Jul;34(14):2554-65. Lee S, Henderson MJ, Schiffhauer E, Despanie J, Henry K, Kang PW, Walker D, McClure ML, Wilson L, Sorscher EJ, Zeitlin PL
Interference with ubiquitination in CFTR modifies stability of core glycosylated and cell surface pools.
Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Jul;34(14):2554-65., [PMID:24777605]
Abstract [show]
It is recognized that both wild-type and mutant CFTR proteins undergo ubiquitination at multiple lysines in the proteins and in one or more subcellular locations. We hypothesized that ubiquitin is added to specific sites in wild-type CFTR to stabilize it and at other sites to signal for proteolysis. Mass spectrometric analysis of wild-type CFTR identified ubiquitinated lysines 68, 710, 716, 1041, and 1080. We demonstrate that the ubiquitinated K710, K716, and K1041 residues stabilize wild-type CFTR, protecting it from proteolysis. The polyubiquitin linkage is predominantly K63. N-tail mutants, K14R and K68R, lead to increased mature band CCFTR, which can be augmented by proteasomal (but not lysosomal) inhibition, allowing trafficking to the surface. The amount of CFTR in the K1041R mutant was drastically reduced and consisted of bands A/B, suggesting that the site in transmembrane 10 (TM10) was critical to further processing beyond the proteasome. The K1218R mutant increases total and cell surface CFTR, which is further accumulated by proteasomal and lysosomal inhibition. Thus, ubiquitination at residue 1218 may destabilize wild-type CFTR in both the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and recycling pools. Small molecules targeting the region of residue 1218 to block ubiquitination or to preserving structure at residues 710 to 716 might be protein sparing for some forms of cystic fibrosis.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
300 Table 3 lists the findings: K14X (stop), K68E, K68N, K710X (stop), K1080Q, K1080R, and K1080I mutations already exist in human genes.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 24777605:300:53
status: NEW[hide] Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis us... Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209. Baker MW, Atkins AE, Cordovado SK, Hendrix M, Earley MC, Farrell PM
Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study.
Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209., [PMID:25674778]
Abstract [show]
Purpose:Many regions have implemented newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) using a limited panel of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) mutations after immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) analysis. We sought to assess the feasibility of further improving the screening using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology.Methods:An NGS assay was used to detect 162 CFTR mutations/variants characterized by the CFTR2 project. We used 67 dried blood spots (DBSs) containing 48 distinct CFTR mutations to validate the assay. NGS assay was retrospectively performed on 165 CF screen-positive samples with one CFTR mutation.Results:The NGS assay was successfully performed using DNA isolated from DBSs, and it correctly detected all CFTR mutations in the validation. Among 165 screen-positive infants with one CFTR mutation, no additional disease-causing mutation was identified in 151 samples consistent with normal sweat tests. Five infants had a CF-causing mutation that was not included in this panel, and nine with two CF-causing mutations were identified.Conclusion:The NGS assay was 100% concordant with traditional methods. Retrospective analysis results indicate an IRT/NGS screening algorithm would enable high sensitivity, better specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). This study lays the foundation for prospective studies and for introducing NGS in NBS laboratories.Genet Med advance online publication 12 February 2015Genetics in Medicine (2015); doi:10.1038/gim.2014.209.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
15 Correspondence: Mei W. Baker (mwbaker@wisc.edu) Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study Mei W. Baker, MD1,2 , Anne E. Atkins, MPH2 , Suzanne K. Cordovado, PhD3 , Miyono Hendrix, MS3 , Marie C. Earley, PhD3 and Philip M. Farrell, MD, PhD1,4 Table 1ߒ CF-causing or varying consequences mutations in the MiSeqDx IUO Cystic Fibrosis System c.1521_1523delCTT (F508del) c.2875delG (3007delG) c.54-5940_273ߙ+ߙ10250del21kb (CFTRdele2,3) c.3909C>G (N1303K) c.3752G>A (S1251N) Mutations that cause CF when combined with another CF-causing mutation c.1624G>T (G542X) c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A (3120ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3964-78_4242ߙ+ߙ577del (CFTRdele22,23) c.613C>T (P205S) c.1021T>C (S341P) c.948delT (1078delT) c.2988G>A (3120G->A) c.328G>C (D110H) c.200C>T (P67L) c.1397C>A (S466X(C>A)) c.1022_1023insTC (1154insTC) c.2989-1G>A (3121-1G->A) c.3310G>T (E1104X) c.3937C>T (Q1313X) c.1397C>G (S466X(C>G)) c.1081delT (1213delT) c.3140-26A>G (3272-26A->G) c.1753G>T (E585X) c.658C>T (Q220X) c.1466C>A (S489X) c.1116ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1248ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3528delC (3659delC) c.178G>T (E60X) c.115C>T (Q39X) c.1475C>T (S492F) c.1127_1128insA (1259insA) c.3659delC (3791delC) c.2464G>T (E822X) c.1477C>T (Q493X) c.1646G>A (S549N) c.1209ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1341ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T (3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC->T) c.2491G>T (E831X) c.1573C>T (Q525X) c.1645A>C (S549R) c.1329_1330insAGAT (1461ins4) c.3744delA (3876delA) c.274G>A (E92K) c.1654C>T (Q552X) c.1647T>G (S549R) c.1393-1G>A (1525-1G->A) c.3773_3774insT (3905insT) c.274G>T (E92X) c.2668C>T (Q890X) c.2834C>T (S945L) c.1418delG (1548delG) c.262_263delTT (394delTT) c.3731G>A (G1244E) c.292C>T (Q98X) c.1013C>T (T338I) c.1545_1546delTA (1677delTA) c.3873ߙ+ߙ1G>A (4005ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.532G>A (G178R) c.3196C>T (R1066C) c.1558G>T (V520F) c.1585-1G>A (1717-1G->A) c.3884_3885insT (4016insT) c.988G>T (G330X) c.3197G>A (R1066H) c.3266G>A (W1089X) c.1585-8G>A (1717-8G->A) c.273ߙ+ߙ1G>A (405ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.1652G>A (G551D) c.3472C>T (R1158X) c.3611G>A (W1204X) c.1679ߙ+ߙ1.6kbA>G (1811ߙ+ߙ1.6kbA->G) c.274-1G>A (406-1G->A) c.254G>A (G85E) c.3484C>T (R1162X) c.3612G>A (W1204X) c.1680-1G>A (1812-1G->A) c.4077_4080delTGTTinsAA (4209TGTT->AA) c.2908G>C (G970R) c.349C>T (R117C) c.3846G>A (W1282X) c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1898ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.4251delA (4382delA) c.595C>T (H199Y) c.1000C>T (R334W) c.1202G>A (W401X) c.1766ߙ+ߙ3A>G (1898ߙ+ߙ 3A->G) c.325_327delTATinsG (457TAT->G) c.1007T>A (I336K) c.1040G>A (R347H) c.1203G>A (W401X) c.2012delT (2143delT) c.442delA (574delA) c.1519_1521delATC (I507del) c.1040G>C (R347P) c.2537G>A (W846X) c.2051_2052delAAinsG (2183AA->G) c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T (621ߙ+ߙ 1G->T) c.2128A>T (K710X) c.1055G>A (R352Q) c.3276C>A (Y1092X (C>A)) c.2052delA (2184delA) c.531delT (663delT) c.3194T>C (L1065P) c.1657C>T (R553X) c.3276C>G (Y1092X (C>G)) c.2052_2053insA (2184insA) c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T (711ߙ+ߙ 1G->T) c.3230T>C (L1077P) c.1679G>A (R560K) c.366T>A (Y122X) c.2175_2176insA (2307insA) c.579ߙ+ߙ3A>G (711ߙ+ߙ 3A->G) c.617T>G (L206W) c.1679G>C (R560T) - c.2215delG (2347delG) c.579ߙ+ߙ5G>A (711ߙ+ߙ 5G->A) c.1400T>C (L467P) c.2125C>T (R709X) - c.2453delT (2585delT) c.580-1G>T (712-1G->T) c.2195T>G (L732X) c.223C>T (R75X) - c.2490ߙ+ߙ1G>A (2622ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.720_741delAGGGAG AATGATGATGAAGTAC (852del22) c.2780T>C (L927P) c.2290C>T (R764X) - c.2583delT (2711delT) c.1364C>A (A455E) c.3302T>A (M1101K) c.2551C>T (R851X) - c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A (2789ߙ+ߙ5G->A) c.1675G>A (A559T) c.1A>G (M1V) c.3587C>G (S1196X) - Mutations/variants that were validated in this study are in bold. CF, cystic fibrosis. Table 1ߒ Continued on next page reduce carrier detection and potentially improve the positive predictive value (PPV), the NBS goals of equity and the highest possible sensitivity become more difficult to achieve.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 25674778:15:2919
status: NEW[hide] The improvement of the best practice guidelines fo... Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99. Girardet A, Viart V, Plaza S, Daina G, De Rycke M, Des Georges M, Fiorentino F, Harton G, Ishmukhametova A, Navarro J, Raynal C, Renwick P, Saguet F, Schwarz M, SenGupta S, Tzetis M, Roux AF, Claustres M
The improvement of the best practice guidelines for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: toward an international consensus.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99., [PMID:26014425]
Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorders, giving couples the opportunity to conceive unaffected children without having to consider termination of pregnancy. However, there are no available standardized protocols, so that each center has to develop its own diagnostic strategies and procedures. Furthermore, reproductive decisions are complicated by the diversity of disease-causing variants in the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene and the complexity of correlations between genotypes and associated phenotypes, so that attitudes and practices toward the risks for future offspring can vary greatly between countries. On behalf of the EuroGentest Network, eighteen experts in PGD and/or molecular diagnosis of CF from seven countries attended a workshop held in Montpellier, France, on 14 December 2011. Building on the best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD established by ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology), the goal of this meeting was to formulate specific guidelines for CF-PGD in order to contribute to a better harmonization of practices across Europe. Different topics were covered including variant nomenclature, inclusion criteria, genetic counseling, PGD strategy and reporting of results. The recommendations are summarized here, and updated information on the clinical significance of CFTR variants and associated phenotypes is presented.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 27 May 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.99.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
79 (unknown) Q39X c.115C4T p.Gln39* P67L c.200C4T p.Pro67Leu R75X c.223C4T p.Arg75* 405+1G4A c.273+1G4A 406-1G4A c.274-1G4A E92X c.274G4T p.Glu92* E92K c.274G4A p.Glu92Lys Q98X c.292C4T p.Gln98* 457TAT4G c.325_327delTATinsG p.Tyr109Glyfs*4 D110H c.328G4C p.Asp110His R117C c.349C4T p.Arg117Cys Y122X c.366 T4A p.Tyr122* 574delA c.442delA p.Ile148Leufs*5 444delA c.313delA p.Ile105Serfs*2 663delT c.531delT p.Ile177Metfs*12 G178R c.532G4A p.Gly178Arg 711+3 A4G c.579+3 A4G 711+5G4A c.579+5G4A 712-1G4T c.580-1G4T H199Y c.595C4T p.His199Tyr P205S c.613C4T p.Pro205Ser L206W c.617 T4G p.Leu206Trp Q220X c.658C4T p.Gln220* 852del22 c.720_741delAGGGAGAAT GATGATGAAGTAC p.Gly241Glufs*13 1078delT c.948delT p.Phe316Leufs*12 G330X c.988G4T p.Gly330* Table 1 (Continued ) HGVS nomenclature Legacy name cDNA nucleotide name Protein name R334W c.1000C4T p.Arg334Trp I336K c.1007 T4A p.Ile336Lys T338I c.1013C4T p.Thr338Ile 1154insTC c.1021_1022dupTC p.Phe342Hisfs*28 S341P c.1021 T4C p.Ser341Pro R347H c.1040G4A p.Arg347His 1213delT c.1081delT p.Trp361Glyfs*8 1248+1G4A c.1116+1G4A 1259insA c.1130dupA p.Gln378Alafs*4 W401X(TAG) c.1202G4A p.Trp401* W401X(TGA) c.1203G4A p.Trp401* 1341+1G4A c.1209+1G4A 1461ins4 c.1329_1330insAGAT p.Ile444Argfs*3 1525-1G4A c.1393-1G4A S466X c.1397C4A or c.1397C4G p.Ser466* L467P c.1400 T4C p.Leu467Pro S489X c.1466C4A p.Ser489* S492F c.1475C4T p.Ser492Phe 1677delTA c.1545_1546delTA p.Tyr515* V520F c.1558G4T p.Val520Phe 1717-1G4A c.1585-1G4A 1717-8G4A c.1585-8G4A S549R c.1645 A4C p.Ser549Arg S549N c.1646G4A p.Ser549Asn S549R c.1647 T4G p.Ser549Arg Q552X c.1654C4T p.Gln552* A559T c.1675G4A p.Ala559Thr 1811+1.6kbA4G c.1680-886 A4G 1812-1G4A c.1680-1G4A R560K c.1679G4A p.Arg560Lys E585X c.1753G4T p.Glu585* 1898+3 A4G c.1766+3 A4G 2143delT c.2012delT p.Leu671* 2184insA c.2052_2053insA p.Gln685Thrfs*4 2184delA c.2052delA p.Lys684Asnfs*38 R709X c.2125C4T p.Arg709* K710X c.2128 A4T p.Lys710* 2307insA c.2175dupA p.Glu726Argfs*4 L732X c.2195 T4G p.Leu732* 2347delG c.2215delG p.Val739Tyrfs*16 R764X c.2290C4T p.Arg764* 2585delT c.2453delT p.Leu818Trpfs*3 E822X c.2464G4T p.Glu822* 2622+1G4A c.2490+1G4A E831X c.2491G4T p.Glu831* W846X c.2537G4A p.Trp846* W846X (2670TGG4TGA) c.2538G4A p.Trp846* R851X c.2551C4T p.Arg851* 2711delT c.2583delT p.Phe861Leufs*3 S945L c.2834C4T p.Ser945Leu 2789+2insA c.2657+2_2657+3insA Q890X c.2668C4T p.Gln890* L927P c.2780 T4C p.Leu927Pro 3007delG c.2875delG p.Ala959Hisfs*9 G970R c.2908G4C p.Gly970Arg 3120G4A c.2988G4A function variants that cause CF disease when paired together; (ii) variants that retain residual CFTR function and are compatible with milder phenotypes such as CFTR-RD; (iii) variants with no clinical consequences; and (iv) variants of unproven or uncertain clinical relevance.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 26014425:79:1888
status: NEW[hide] Prevalence of meconium ileus marks the severity of... Genet Med. 2015 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.79. Dupuis A, Keenan K, Ooi CY, Dorfman R, Sontag MK, Naehrlich L, Castellani C, Strug LJ, Rommens JM, Gonska T
Prevalence of meconium ileus marks the severity of mutations of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene.
Genet Med. 2015 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.79., [PMID:26087176]
Abstract [show]
RATIONALE: Meconium ileus (MI) is a perinatal complication in cystic fibrosis (CF), which is only minimally influenced by environmental factors. We derived and examined MI prevalence (MIP) scores to assess CFTR phenotype-phenotype correlation for severe mutations. METHOD: MIP scores were established using a Canadian CF population (n = 2,492) as estimates of the proportion of patients with MI among all patients carrying the same CFTR mutation, focusing on patients with p.F508del as the second allele. Comparisons were made to the registries from the US CF Foundation (n = 43,432), Italy (Veneto/Trentino/Alto Adige regions) (n = 1,788), and Germany (n = 3,596). RESULTS: The prevalence of MI varied among the different registries (13-21%). MI was predominantly prevalent in patients with pancreatic insufficiency carrying "severe" CFTR mutations. In this severe spectrum MIP scores further distinguished between mutation types, for example, G542X (0.31) with a high, F508del (0.22) with a moderate, and G551D (0.08) with a low MIP score. Higher MIP scores were associated with more severe clinical phenotypes, such as a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = 0.01) and body mass index z score (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: MIP scores can be used to rank CFTR mutations according to their clinical severity and provide a means to expand delineation of CF phenotypes.Genet Med advance online publication 18 June 2015Genetics in Medicine (2015); doi:10.1038/gim.2015.79.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
63 Canadian studies for CF modfier genes 2,492 3,153 43,432 3,596 1,788 2,230 23,397 16,023 3 716 3,438 860 15% (19%) 1,902 2,576 PIP and MIP derivation FEV1 and zBMI modeling MIP calculation following correction of MI variable 23,301 2,413 510 21% (25%) 20% (23%) 13% (15%) Total F508del/others MI prevalence uncorrected (estimated) Missing or incomplete genotype Available for analysis Canadian CF patient registry, born after 1980 US CF patient registry German CF patient registry CF patient registry, North Italy Table 1ߒ Meconium ileus prevalence scores for the most common cystic fibrosis-causing variants p. F508del/other variants Class PIP Canada, (n) MIP, (n) Canada United States Germany Italy HGVS Legacy name c.262_263delTT 394delTT I 0.38 (50) c.3472C>T R1158X I 0.37 (35) c.1558G>T V520F 0.35 (43) c.3484C>T R1162X I 0.34 (135) 0.17 (14) 0.22 (45) c.2012delT 2143delT I 0.33 (13) c.3276C>A or G Y1092X I 0.92 (13) 0.09 (12) 0.33 (55) c.3846G>A W1282X I 1.00 (13) 0.29 (13) 0.32 (442) 0.17 (20) c.1477C>T Q493X I 1.00 (11) 0.19 (11) 0.32 (102) c.3528delC 3659delC I 0.31 (139) c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T 711ߙ+ߙ1G>T 0.97 (39) 0.30 (38) 0.31 (54) c.178G>T E60X I 0.30 (66) c.1657C>T R553X I 1.00 (16) 0.28 (16) 0.30 (415) 0.24 (107) c.1585-1G>A 1717-1G>A I 1.00 (12) 0.23 (12) 0.29 (367) 0.22 (38) 0.16 (22) c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A 1898ߙ+ߙ1G>A 0.29 (139) c.1624G>T G542X I 0.99 (73) 0.31 (72) 0.29 (976) 0.21 (79) 0.22 (33) c.1521_1523delCTT F508del II 0.99 (1292) 0.22 (1260) 0.27 (15391) 0.21 (1910) 0.20 (230) c.1679G>C R560T II 0.27 (123) c.3744delA 3876delA 0.27 (22) c.2128A>T K710X I 0.26 (12) c.1519_1521delATC I507del II 1.00 (20) 0.21 (19) 0.25 (162) c.3909C>G N1303K II 0.98 (40) 0.13 (39) 0.25 (534) 0.23 (80) 0.14 (62) c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T 621ߙ+ߙ1G>T I 1.00 (90) 0.24 (88) 0.25 (369) 0.21 (11) c.3266G>A W1089X I 0.25 (17) c.1675G>A A559T 0.24 (21) c.988G>T G330X 0.24 (10) c.3773_3774insT 3905insT 0.23 (78) c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A 3120ߙ+ߙ1G>A 0.22 (121) c.443T>C I148T;3199del6 1.00 (15) 0.22 (15) c.2052delA 2184delA I 0.21 (89) 0.22 (10) c.2051_2052delAAinsG 2183AA>G 0.20 (73) 0.20 (42) c.948delT 1078delT 0.19 (20) c.1652G>A G551D III 0.96 (54) 0.08 (53) 0.15 (979) 0.09 (84) c.254G>A G85E 0.50 (24) 0.06 (24) 0.14 (137) 0.00 (10) c.3196C>T R1066C 0.14 (42) c.1466C>A S489X 1.00 (14) 0.14 (14) c.3808G>A D1270N 0.13 (19) c.1055G>A R352Q 0.12 (18) c.579ߙ+ߙ5G>A 711ߙ+ߙ5G>A 0.12 (30) c.2175_2176insA 2307insA 0.11 (24) c.349C>T R117C 0.10 (37) c.1040G>C R347P IV 0.18 (11) 0.19 (11) 0.10 (130) 0.02 (56) c.350G>A R117H IV 0.05 (21) 0.00 (21) 0.07 (666) 0.02 (19) c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A 2789ߙ+ߙ5G>A V 0.25 (20) 0.00 (20) 0.06 (271) 0.01 (21) c.1040G>A R347H 0.06 (55) c.2988G>A 3120G->A 0.06 (36) c.328G>C D1152H IV 0.06 (124) c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T 3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC>T V 0.07 (14) 0.00 (14) 0.05 (299) 0.01 (42) 0.00 (15) c.1364C>A A455E V 0.16 (45) 0.01 (41) 0.05 (109) c.1000C>T R334W IV 0.18 (11) 0.00 (10) 0.05 (92) c.617T>G L206W 0.06 (18) 0.05 (17) 0.04 (52) c.3302T>A M1101K 0.04 (17) c.200C>T P67L V 0.07 (14) 0.00 (14) Meconium ileus prevalence (MIP) and pancreas insufficiency prevalence (PIP) scores are presented.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys710* 26087176:63:1623
status: NEW