ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Tyr2203*

ClinVar:

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Phenotypes of 16 Stargardt macular dystrophy/fundu... Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;240(8):628-38. Epub 2002 Jul 4. Gerth C, Andrassi-Darida M, Bock M, Preising MN, Weber BH, Lorenz B
Phenotypes of 16 Stargardt macular dystrophy/fundus flavimaculatus patients with known ABCA4 mutations and evaluation of genotype-phenotype correlation.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;240(8):628-38. Epub 2002 Jul 4., [PMID:12192456]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To determine the phenotypic variability in patients with compound heterozygous or homozygous ABCA4 mutations, and to correlate the phenotypes with the functional properties of the altered protein. METHODS: Sixteen patients from 13 families with signs of Stargardt macular dystrophy/fundus flavimaculatus and known mutations on both alleles of the ABCA4 gene (15 compound heterozygous, one homozygous) were characterized by clinical examination, fundus autofluorescence, psychophysics (color vision, kinetic and two-color dark- and light-adapted static threshold perimetry), and electrophysiology (Ganzfeld, multifocal ERG, EOG). RESULTS: The homozygous 5917delG mutation resulted in the earliest disease manifestation (at 5 years) and a general cone-rod dysfunction, whereas the compound heterozygous mother (5917delG, G1961E) exhibited a very mild phenotype. Compound heterozygotes for the IVS40+5G-->A and the C1488Y or Y362X mutation showed also an early age of onset but only a central dysfunction. The effect of the 2588G-->C mutation, the G1961E mutation, and the complex mutation L541P-A1038V depended on the mutation in the second allele. Genotype-phenotype correlation appeared possible in most instances. Psychophysics revealed a simultaneous yet not necessarily congruent cone and rod dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The type and combination of ABCA4 mutations in compound heterozygous patients determined were compatible with the severity of the phenotype as to age of onset and the functional consequences in the majority of patients. Unexplained phenotypic differences indicate the influence of other factors. ABCA4 mutations result in cone and rod dysfunction. Different disease durations limit the power of presently available genotype-phenotype correlations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
81 Patient 2 had a Table 2 Identified mutations in the ABCR alleles in the 16 patients (ND not tested) Patient ABCA4 allele 1 ABCA4 allele 2 no./sex (1*) Nucleotide changes Effects Nucleotide changes Effects 1a/F (139) 5917delG Frameshift 5917delG Frameshift 1b/F(139b) 5917delG Frameshift 5882G→A G1961E 2/M (167) IVS 40+5G→A Splice 4463G→A C1488Y 3/F (108) IVS 40+5G→A Splice 1086T→A Y362X 4/M (109) 1622T→C- L541P-A1038V 2564G→A W855X 3113C→T 5/F (113) 1622T→C- L541P-A1038V 2588G→C Splice 3113C→T 6/M (50) 2588G→C Splice 3113C→T A1038V 7b/M (138) 2588G→C Splice IVS13+1G→A Splice 7a/F Not tested Splice Not tested Splice 8/F (111) 5882G→A G1961E 2292delT-2295T→G Frameshift-S765R 9/F (147) 5882G→A G1961E IVS36+1G→A Splice 10/F (41) 5882G→A G1961E 2041C→T R681X 11a/F (114) 5882G→A G1961E 6609C→A Y2203X 11b/M ND ND 12/F (148) 3292C→;T R1097C 6609C→A Y2203X 13/M (107) 3528insTGCA Frameshift 2291G→A C764Y* Refers to the patients` ID in [42] Table3Demographicdataandclinicalfeaturesofthe16patients(NDtestnotdone,Aabnormal,Nnormal,RreducedArdenratio,NRnotreliable,NAmfERGnotanalyz- able,+present,-absent,DCdarkchoroid,DDdiscdiameter) Pat.aAgeDiseaseVisualacuityColorFun-GanzfeldERGEOGmfERGStatictwo-colorKineticperimetryAngio-FundusAF atdurationvisiondusbthresholdperimetrygraphy onset/(years)ODOSRodMaximalConePeakResponseCentralCon-CentralCircularPeri- examresponseresponseresponsetimesdensitiesMeanRSLMeanCSLscotomacentricAFAFmacular/ b-wavecb-wavec30Hzab-abnormalc(dB)e(dB)efortargetcon-AF flickerdnormaldstriction <=13°>13°<=13°>13° 1a5/10520/250*20/250NDIfNDNANAND-ND-NRNRND+-- 1b32/32020/30*20/30NDINDNNNDN5-10°ND-ND-NDNDND+-- 27/15820/10020/200*AIINNNND5-15°5-25°2120--ND+-+ 39/13420/250*20/250AIINNNN5-15°5-25°0030I-2e-ND+++ 47/12520/25020/250*AIIINNNN5-25°5-25°ND-ND-I-4e-ND>1DD-- 520/4525<20/400<20/400*AIIINNNNNANA194143II-3e+ND>1DD-+ 614/19520/200*20/200AIINDNNNR5-10°5-25°1080I-4e-ND+-+ 7b16/23720/25020/250*AIINDNNR20°5-25°101113I-3e-ND+-+ 7a6/272120/20020/200NDIINDNDNDNDND-ND-ND-NDNDNDND 815/18320/100*20/100AINNND5-10°5-25°2010I-2e-N++- 921/23220/40*20/200AINDNNN10-15°5°0060NDNDN+++ 1024/31720/400*20/400AIINNNN5°5-15°3270I-2e-ND+-+ 11a16/331720/200*20/200AIINDNNNN5-15°81140I-2e-NDND 11b26/28220/20020/200*AINNNN5-10°,5-10°0010I-2e-ND+++ 20-25° 1238/571920/22*20/250NDIII(OD)ND5-25°5-25°35/3835/39ND-III/4e-NDND 1314/16220/100*20/100AIINDNNNN5-25°1120ND-DC+-+ aOnenumberindicatesonefamily bReferredtoTable1 cResults<5thpercentile dResults>95thpercentile eRSL(rodsensitivityloss;500nm,darkadapted)andCSL(conesensitivityloss; 600nm,lightadapted)comparedtothe10thpercentileofnormals;mfERGrespons- eswereanalyzedforallbutthecentral(1°inradius)responseduetohighnoise fRetinalvesselattenuation *EyetestedformfERG/staticperimetry CSL within 13° and a more widespread RSL over the 30° test field. Login to comment
98 Patients with the missense mutation G1961E Four patients were compound heterozygous for this missense mutation and an alteration in the donor splice site of exon 36 (IVS36+1G→A, patient 9), a nonsense mutation (R681X, patient 10; Y2203X, patient 11a) or frameshift mutation [5917delG, patient 1b (results described above)] (Figs. 2, 3). Login to comment
108 Patients with the nonsense mutation Y2203X Three patients were identified as compound heterozygous for this nonsense mutation and the missense mutations G1961E [siblings 11a and 11b (results described above)] or R1097C (patient 12) (Figs. 3, 4). Login to comment
109 Age at onset Fig. 3 Fundus photograph, RSL, CSL, and mfERG trace arrays (from top to bottom) of two siblings (patients 11a and 11b) with the Y2203X mutation in one and the G1961E mutation in the second ABCA4 allele. Scale for mfERG/perimetry shown in Fig. 1 Fig. 4 Fundus photograph, RSL, and mfERG trace arrays (from top to bottom) of patient 12 with the Y2203X mutation in one and the R1097C mutation in the second ABCA4 allele. Scale for mfERG/perimetry shown in Fig. 1 varied (Table 3). Login to comment
167 636 The missense mutation G1961E (with a clearly reduced ATPase activity but wild-type-like yield [49]) associated with the splice donor mutation IVS36+1G→A (patient 9), the complex mutation 2292delT-S765R (patient 8), the nonsense R681X mutation (patient 10) or the Y2203X mutation (patient 11a) in the second allele resulted in different degrees of photoreceptor dysfunction. Login to comment
171 The Y2203X mutation is located beyond the second NBD and abolishes about 70 amino acids of the C-terminus. Login to comment
172 Since ABCA4 is not prenylated, the loss of these amino acids may cause a less impaired protein function than the 2292delT-S765R and R681X mutations, which predict a loss of about three quarters of the gene product due to the location in the first TMD. Login to comment
173 By correlating the functional prediction to the clinical phenotype it is obvious that the patient with the G1961E- Y2203X mutation showed a more advanced rod dysfunction than the other patients with the G1961E mutation in one allele. Login to comment
175 The Y2203X mutation associated with the missense mutation R1097C (NBD-1) in patient 12 resulted in a less severe phenotype than seen in patient 11a (G1961E). Login to comment
178 Together with Y2203X, a milder phenotype may be predicted. Login to comment
166 636 The missense mutation G1961E (with a clearly reduced ATPase activity but wild-type-like yield [49]) associated with the splice donor mutation IVS36+1G࢐A (patient 9), the complex mutation 2292delT-S765R (patient 8), the nonsense R681X mutation (patient 10) or the Y2203X mutation (patient 11a) in the second allele resulted in different degrees of photoreceptor dysfunction. Login to comment
170 The Y2203X mutation is located beyond the second NBD and abolishes about 70 amino acids of the C-terminus. Login to comment
174 The Y2203X mutation associated with the missense mutation R1097C (NBD-1) in patient 12 resulted in a less severe phenotype than seen in patient 11a (G1961E). Login to comment
177 Together with Y2203X, a milder phenotype may be predicted. Login to comment

[hide] A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in th... Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct;67(4):800-13. Epub 2000 Aug 24. Rivera A, White K, Stohr H, Steiner K, Hemmrich N, Grimm T, Jurklies B, Lorenz B, Scholl HP, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Weber BH
A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene in Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct;67(4):800-13. Epub 2000 Aug 24., [PMID:10958763]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease (STGD) is a common autosomal recessive maculopathy of early and young-adult onset and is caused by alterations in the gene encoding the photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter (ABCA4). We have studied 144 patients with STGD and 220 unaffected individuals ascertained from the German population, to complete a comprehensive, population-specific survey of the sequence variation in the ABCA4 gene. In addition, we have assessed the proposed role for ABCA4 in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a common cause of late-onset blindness, by studying 200 affected individuals with late-stage disease. Using a screening strategy based primarily on denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, we have identified in the three study groups a total of 127 unique alterations, of which 90 have not been previously reported, and have classified 72 as probable pathogenic mutations. Of the 288 STGD chromosomes studied, mutations were identified in 166, resulting in a detection rate of approximately 58%. Eight different alleles account for 61% of the identified disease alleles, and at least one of these, the L541P-A1038V complex allele, appears to be a founder mutation in the German population. When the group with AMD and the control group were analyzed with the same methodology, 18 patients with AMD and 12 controls were found to harbor possible disease-associated alterations. This represents no significant difference between the two groups; however, for detection of modest effects of rare alleles in complex diseases, the analysis of larger cohorts of patients may be required.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
80 Nucleotide alterations occurring in sim- Table 2 ABCA4 Mutations Found in Patients with STGD and AMD and in Controls EXON AND NUCLEOTIDE CHANGE EFFECT NO. OF ALLELES REFERENCE(S) STGD (288) AMD (400) Control (440) 3: 178GrA A60T 1 0 0 This study 179CrT A60E 1 0 0 This study 194GrA G65E 1 0 0 Fishman et al. (1999) 203CrT P68L 1 0 0 This study 214GrA G72R 1 0 0 This study 296insA Frameshift 2 0 0 This study 5: 454CrT R152X 1 0 0 This study 6: 634CrT R212C 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 688TrA C230S 1 0 0 This study 730delCT Frameshift 1 0 0 This study 740ArG N247S 1 0 0 This study 768GrT Splice 2 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 8: 983ArT E328V 1a 0 0 This study 1086TrA Y362X 1 0 0 This study 10: 1317GrA W438X 1 0 0 This study 11: 1411GrA E471K 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 12: 1622TrC L541P 21a 1a 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 1715GrA R572Q 1a 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 13: 1819GrA G607R 1 0 0 This study 1903CrA Q635K 2a 0 0 This study 1903CrT Q635X 1 0 0 This study IVS13ϩ1GrA Splice 2 0 0 This study 14: 1957CrT R653C 1 0 0 This study 1988GrA W663X 1 0 0 This study 2041CrT R681X 4 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 15: 2291GrA C764Y 1 0 0 This study 2292delT Frameshift 1a 0 0 This study 2295TrG S765R 1a 0 0 This study 16: 2564GrA W855X 1 0 0 Nasonkin et al. (1998) 17: 2588GrC Spliceb 17a 6 5 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Cremers et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999), Papaioannou et al. (2000) 18: 2701ArG T901A 0 2 0 This study 2741ArG H914A 0 0 1 This study 19: 2876CrT T959I 1 0 0 This study 20: IVS20ϩ5GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 21: 3106GrA E1036K 1a 0 0 Nasonkin et al. (1998) 3113CrT A1038V 26a 4a 1 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Cremers et al. (1998), Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) T3187TrC S1063P 1 0 0 This study (Continued) 805 Table 2 Continued EXON AND NUCLEOTIDE CHANGE EFFECT NO. OF ALLELES REFERENCE(S) STGD (288) AMD (400) Control (440) 22: 3292CrT R1097C 1 0 0 This study 3322CrT R1108C 4 0 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999) 24: 3528insTGCA Frameshift 1 0 0 This study 25: 3808GrT E1270X 1 0 0 This study 27: 3898CrT R1300X 1 0 0 This study 28: IVS28ϩ5GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 4139CrT P1380L 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 4195GrA E1399K 2 0 0 This study 4234CrT Q1412X 4 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 29: 4289TrC L1430P 2 0 0 This study 4318TrG F1440V 1 0 0 This study 4328GrA R1443H 1 0 0 This study 30: 4457CrT P1486L 1 0 0 Lewis et al. (1999) 4463GrA C1488Y 1 0 0 This study 31: 4610CrT T1537M 1 0 0 This study 35: IVS35ϩ2TrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 36: 5065TrC S1689P 1 0 0 This study 5114GrT R1705L 1 0 0 This study IVS36ϩ1GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 37: 5198TrC M1733T 0 0 1 This study 5242GrA G1748R 1 0 0 This study 5248CrT Q1750X 1 0 0 This study 5288TrC L1763P 1 0 0 This study 38: IVS38ϩ1GrA Splice 1 0 0 This study 40: 5653GrA E1885K 1 0 0 This study 5693GrA R1898H 5 2 1 Allikmets et al. (1997b), Lewis et al. (1999) IVS40ϩ5GrA Splice 8a 0 0 Cremers et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 42: 5882GrA G1961E 34 4 2 Allikmets et al. (1997b), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999), Maugeri et al. (1999) 43: 5917delG Frameshift 3 0 0 This study 5923GrC G1975R 1 0 0 This study 5929GrA G1977S 1 0 0 Rozet et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999) 45: 6229CrG R2077G 1 0 0 This study 6229CrT R2077W 1 0 0 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Fishman et al. (1999), Lewis et al. (1999) 48: 6609CrA Y2203X 2 0 0 This study 6647GrT A2216V 0 0 1 This study a Mutation pairs occurring on a single haplotype. Login to comment
111 Likewise, for the intron 28 alteration, a spliced product Table 5 Patients with STGD Who Have Two Identified Disease Alleles AGE AT ONSET AND PATIENT MUTATION SEGREGATION IN FAMILY a Allele 1 Allele 2 5-9 years: STGD17 Q1412X R2077W Yes STGD88 G65E G1961E NA STGD93 G1961E G1961E Yes STGD99 L541P-A1038V G1961E Yes STGD100 L541P-A1038V IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes STGD108 Y362X IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes STGD109 L541P-A1038V W855X Yes STGD139b 5917delG 5917delG Yes STGD167 C1488Y IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes 10-14 years: STGD21 R681X R1898H NA STGD37 L541P-A1038V L541P-A1038V Yes STGD47/164 IVS13ϩ1GrA 2588GrC Yes STGD50 2588GrC A1038V NA STGD70 2588GrC IVS40ϩ5GrA NA STGD82 L541P-A1038V S1063P Yes STGD87 2588GrC Q1750X Yes STGD98 R212C T959I Yes STGD102 R572Q-2588GrC IVS35ϩ2TrA Yes STGD107 C764Y 3528ins4 Yes STGD120 L1430P L1430P NA STGD121 R1300X IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes STGD156 R1108C G1961E NA STGD159 R1108C Q1412X Yes STGD171 L541P-A1038V G1961E NA 15-19 years: STGD34 G768T G1961E Yes STGD39 L541P-A1038V R1443H NA STGD40/163 2588GrC E1885K Yes STGD45 E1399K G1977S Yes STGD59 R1898H G1975R NA STGD67 P68L S1689P Yes STGD75 Q635K IVS40ϩ5GrA Yes STGD111 2292delT-S765R G1961E Yes STGD114 Y2203X G1961E Yes STGD138 IVS13ϩ1GA 2588GrC Yes 20-24 years: STGD41 R681X G1961E Yes STGD63 A60T R1898H NA STGD86 296insA G1961E Yes STGD91 L541P-A1038V A1038V NA STGD113 L541P-A1038V 2588GrC Yes STGD118b IVS20ϩ5GrA G1961E Yes STGD119 L541P-A1038V G1961E Yes STGD122 L541P-A1038V G1961E Yes STGD135 W663X G1961E NA STGD147 IVS36ϩ1GrA G1961E Yes STGD168 L541P-A1038V G1961E NA 25-29 years: STGD62 G607R G1961E NA STGD71 296insA A1038V Yes STGD78 2588GrC Q1412X Yes STGD103 2588GrC IVS20ϩ5GrA Yes STGD116 L541P-A1038V G1961E Yes STGD139bb G1961E 5917delG Yes у30 years: STGD38 E471K G1961E Yes STGD68 E1399K G1961E Yes STGD69 L541P-A1038V 2588GrC NA STGD95 F1440V G1748R Yes STGD134 C230S G1961E NA STGD144 2588GrC R1705L NA STGD148 R1097C Y2203X NA STGD170 L541P-A1038V 2588GrC NA a NA p not applicable. Login to comment