ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Leu1970Phe

ClinVar:	c.5908C>T , p.Leu1970Phe ? , Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity, not provided
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (59%), C: N (53%), D: D (71%), E: D (53%), F: D (91%), G: D (71%), H: N (53%), I: N (87%), K: D (95%), M: N (87%), N: D (59%), P: D (63%), Q: N (57%), R: D (63%), S: D (53%), T: N (61%), V: N (72%), W: D (71%), Y: N (53%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: N, K: D, M: N, N: D, P: D, Q: D, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Spectrum of ABCR gene mutations in autosomal reces... Eur J Hum Genet. 1998 May-Jun;6(3):291-5. Rozet JM, Gerber S, Souied E, Perrault I, Chatelin S, Ghazi I, Leowski C, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Kaplan J
Spectrum of ABCR gene mutations in autosomal recessive macular dystrophies.
Eur J Hum Genet. 1998 May-Jun;6(3):291-5., [PMID:9781034]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease (STGD) and late-onset fundus flavimaculatus (FFM) are autosomal recessive conditions leading to macular degenerations in childhood and adulthood, respectively. Recently, mutations of the photoreceptor cell-specific ATP binding transporter gene (ABCR) have been reported in Stargardt disease. Here, we report on the screening of the whole coding sequence of the ABCR gene in 40 unrelated STGD and 15 FFM families and we show that mutations truncating the ABCR protein consistently led to STGD. Conversely, all mutations identified in FFM were missense mutations affecting uncharged amino acids. These results provide the first genotype-phenotype correlations in ABCR gene mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
45 Furthermore, all ABCR missense mutations Table 1 Mutations in the ABCR gene in STGD and FFM families Conserved aa in: Nucleotide change Amino acid change Domain ABCs RmP Phenotype Families Comment (571-2)A®G splicing mutation STGD 1 HAD1 (1938-2)A®G splicing mutation STGD 1 (4668+2)T®C splicing mutation STGD 1 (4735+2)T®A splicing mutation STGD 1 del(5196+1-5196+6 splicing mutation STGD 1 LOZ2 2570 delT frameshift mutation STGD 1 3209insGT frameshift mutation STGD 2 CHE2 G3754T E1252X STGD 1 C3994T Q1332X STGD 1 C6337G I2113X STGD 1 JEG2 C52T R18W IC - + STGD 1 C634T R212C EC - + STGD 5 GEN2, JEG2 G1908T Q636H IC - + STGD 1 LOZ2 C3056T T1019M IC - + STGD 1 C3322T R1107C IC - + STGD 1 JUL2 C4916T R1640W IC + + STGD 2 MAR1 G5929A G1977S ATP2 + + STGD 1 GEN2 G6320A R2107H IC + + STGD 1 JUL2 C3114T A1038V IC - + STGD 2 CHE2 +FFM +1 VII2 T1622C L541P EC - + FFM 1 VII2 T31C L11P IC + + FFM 1 G3272A G1090E IC + + FFM 1 G4522T G1508C IC + + FFM 1 C5908T L1970F IC + + FFM 1 GON2 T5912G L1971R IC + + FFM 1 GON2 Mutations refer to the standard nomenclature. Login to comment

[hide] Novel mutations in of the ABCR gene in Italian pat... Eye (Lond). 2010 Jan;24(1):158-64. Epub 2009 Mar 6. Passerini I, Sodi A, Giambene B, Mariottini A, Menchini U, Torricelli F
Novel mutations in of the ABCR gene in Italian patients with Stargardt disease.
Eye (Lond). 2010 Jan;24(1):158-64. Epub 2009 Mar 6., [PMID:19265867]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Stargardt disease (STGD) is the most prevalent juvenile macular dystrophy, and it has been associated with mutations in the ABCR gene, encoding a photoreceptor-specific transport protein. In this study, we determined the mutation spectrum in the ABCR gene in a group of Italian STGD patients. METHODS: The DNA samples of 71 Italian patients (from 62 independent pedigrees), affected with autosomal recessive STGD, were analysed for mutations in all 50 exons of the ABCR gene by the DHPLC approach (with optimization of the DHPLC conditions for mutation analysis) and direct sequencing techniques. RESULTS: In our group of STGD patients, 71 mutations were identified in 68 patients with a detection rate of 95.7%. Forty-three mutations had been already reported in the literature, whereas 28 mutations had not been previously described and were not detected in 150 unaffected control individuals of Italian origin. Missense mutations represented the most frequent finding (59.2%); G1961E was the most common mutation and it was associated with phenotypes in various degrees of severity. CONCLUSIONS: Some novel mutations in the ABCR gene were reported in a group of Italian STGD patients confirming the extensive allelic heterogeneity of this gene-probably related to the vast number of exons that favours rearrangements in the DNA sequence.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
57 Table 2 Summary of the mutations identified in the ABCR gene in our series of STGD Italian patients Patient Allele 1 mutation Allele 2 mutation S 1 R212C T1019M S 8 V1433I V1433I S 21 A1598D A1598D S 33 N96K G978D S 56 A1598D G1961E S 70 R212C T1019M S 71 W700X WT S 74 6750delA V767D S 77 G1961E WT S 82 Q21X G1961E S 106 C1177X G1961E S 107 C1177X G1961E S 114 T970P-F1015E - S 115 T970P-F1015E - S 120 N415K G1961E S 162 324-327insT 324-327insT S 181 W1408X G1961E S 190 C1177X A1598D S 201 G1961E WT S 202 Q21X T970P-F1015E S 213 M840R G1961E S 231 WT WT S 236 C1177X G1961E S 237 WT WT S 241 V256 splice WT S 246 IVS6-1g4t R1108C S 260 L2221P 5109delG-I156V S 321 IVS9 þ 1G4C S1099X S 328 IVS42 þ 4delG IVS35 þ 2t4c S 346 E2096K WT S 347 IVS28 þ 5g4a WT S 353 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 354 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 355 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 360 G1961E 5961delGGAC S 364 IVS35 þ 2t4c G1961E S 365 L541P/A1038V G1961E S 377 IVS42 þ 4delG IVS35 þ 2t4c S 380 R653C WT S 413 R212C T1019M S 414 A1598D G1961E S 417 G1078E G1961E S 438 R1055W WT S 440 4021ins24bp T1526M-G1961E S 449 W1479X L2140Q S 450 W1479X L2140Q S 474 W1461X G 1977S S 486 WT WT S 492 R1098C/L1970F 6548insTGAA S 528 T977P IVS40 þ 5g4a S 531 G690V Q1332X S 532 R572X L1473M-4733delGTTT S 535 IVS40 þ 5g4a 5917delG S 550 IVS40 þ 5g4a 6750delA S 555 250insCAAA WT S 556 250insCAAA WT S 575 N96H G1961E S 590 W821R IVS40 þ 5g4a S 592 V931M R1108C S 593 V767D R2030X Table 2 (Continued ) Patient Allele 1 mutation Allele 2 mutation S 594 G172S G1961E S 602 P1380L G1961E S 607 E616K L1580S-K2172R S 640 250insCAAA S1696N S 694 IVS35 þ 2t4c G1961E S 725 IVS13 þ 1g4a Q1376 splice S 731 L541P-A1038V G1961E S 755 N965S IVS40 þ 5g4a S 789 E1087K G1977S S 968 T1019M G1961E S 992 R212C G1961E Bold values indicate novel mutations. Login to comment

[hide] Frequency of ABCA4 mutations in 278 Spanish contro... Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;93(10):1359-64. Epub 2008 Oct 31. Riveiro-Alvarez R, Aguirre-Lamban J, Lopez-Martinez MA, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Cantalapiedra D, Vallespin E, Avila-Fernandez A, Ramos C, Ayuso C
Frequency of ABCA4 mutations in 278 Spanish controls: an insight into the prevalence of autosomal recessive Stargardt disease.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;93(10):1359-64. Epub 2008 Oct 31., [PMID:18977788]

Abstract [show]
AIM: To determine the carrier frequency of ABCA4 mutations in order to achieve an insight into the prevalence of autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (arSTGD) in the Spanish population. METHODS: arSTGD patients (n = 133) were analysed using ABCR400 microarray and sequencing. Control subjects were analysed by two different strategies: 200 individuals were screened for the p.Arg1129Leu mutation by denaturing-HPLC and sequencing; 78 individuals were tested for variants with the microarray and sequencing. RESULTS: For the first strategy in control subjects, the p.Arg1129Leu variant was found in two heterozygous individuals, which would mean a carrier frequency for any variant of approximately 6.0% and a calculated arSTGD prevalence of 1:1000. For the second strategy, carrier frequency was 6.4% and therefore an estimated prevalence of the disease of 1:870. CONCLUSION: Calculated prevalence of arSTGD based on the ABCA4 carrier frequency could be considerably higher than previous estimation. This discrepancy between observed (genotypic) and estimated (phenotypic) prevalence could be due to the existence of non-pathological or low penetrance alleles, which may result in late-onset arSTGD or may be implicated in age-related macular degeneration. This situation should be regarded with special care when genetic counselling is given and further follow-up of these patients should be recommended.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
96 These Table 1 ABCA4 sequence variants identified in Spanish control population Mutant alleles Nucleotide change Amino acid change Number of cases Number of alleles Frequency (%) Homozygous individuals Mutations* c.661G.A p.Gly221Arg 1 1 0.64 None c.1140T.A p.Asn380Lys 1 1 0.64 None c.2588G.C p.Gly863Ala 1 1 0.64 None c.3113C.T p.Ala1038Val 1 1 0.64 None c.3899G.A p.Arg1300Gln 1 1 0.64 None c.5882G.A p.Gly1961Glu 1 1 0.64 None c.5908C.T p.Leu1970Phe 1 1 0.64 None c.6148G.C p.Val2050Leu 1 1 0.64 None c.6529G.A p.Asp2177Asn 2 2 1.28 None Total 10 Polymorphisms{ c.466A.G p.Ile156Val 5 5 3.2 None c.635G.A p.Arg212His 5 6 3.84 1 c.1268A.G p.His423Arg 43 48 30.7 5 c.1269C.T p.His423His 2 2 1.28 None IVS10+5delG 34 36 23 2 c.2828G.A p.Arg943Gln 1 1 0.64 None c.4203C.A p.Pro1401Pro 3 3 1.9 None IVS33+48C.T 59 75 48 16 c.5603A.T p.Asn1868Ile 4 4 2.5 None c.5682G.C p.Leu1894Leu 29 35 22.4 6 c.5814A.G p.Leu1938Leu 27 33 21.1 6 c.5843 C.T p.Pro1948Leu 9 10 6.4 1 c.5844A.G p.Pro1948Pro 27 32 20.5 5 c.6069C.T p.Ile2023Ile 11 12 7.7 1 c.6249C.T p.Ile2083Ile 12 14 8.9 2 c.6285T.C p.Asp2095Asp 24 26 16.6 2 c.6764G.T p.Ser2255Ile 12 13 8.3 1 *A total of 15 mutant alleles were detected. Login to comment
97 These Table 1 ABCA4 sequence variants identified in Spanish control population Mutant alleles Nucleotide change Amino acid change Number of cases Number of alleles Frequency (%) Homozygous individuals Mutations* c.661G.A p.Gly221Arg 1 1 0.64 None c.1140T.A p.Asn380Lys 1 1 0.64 None c.2588G.C p.Gly863Ala 1 1 0.64 None c.3113C.T p.Ala1038Val 1 1 0.64 None c.3899G.A p.Arg1300Gln 1 1 0.64 None c.5882G.A p.Gly1961Glu 1 1 0.64 None c.5908C.T p.Leu1970Phe 1 1 0.64 None c.6148G.C p.Val2050Leu 1 1 0.64 None c.6529G.A p.Asp2177Asn 2 2 1.28 None Total 10 Polymorphisms{ c.466A.G p.Ile156Val 5 5 3.2 None c.635G.A p.Arg212His 5 6 3.84 1 c.1268A.G p.His423Arg 43 48 30.7 5 c.1269C.T p.His423His 2 2 1.28 None IVS10+5delG 34 36 23 2 c.2828G.A p.Arg943Gln 1 1 0.64 None c.4203C.A p.Pro1401Pro 3 3 1.9 None IVS33+48C.T 59 75 48 16 c.5603A.T p.Asn1868Ile 4 4 2.5 None c.5682G.C p.Leu1894Leu 29 35 22.4 6 c.5814A.G p.Leu1938Leu 27 33 21.1 6 c.5843 C.T p.Pro1948Leu 9 10 6.4 1 c.5844A.G p.Pro1948Pro 27 32 20.5 5 c.6069C.T p.Ile2023Ile 11 12 7.7 1 c.6249C.T p.Ile2083Ile 12 14 8.9 2 c.6285T.C p.Asp2095Asp 24 26 16.6 2 c.6764G.T p.Ser2255Ile 12 13 8.3 1 *A total of 15 mutant alleles were detected. Login to comment

[hide] Denaturing HPLC profiling of the ABCA4 gene for re... Clin Chem. 2004 Aug;50(8):1336-43. Epub 2004 Jun 10. Stenirri S, Fermo I, Battistella S, Galbiati S, Soriani N, Paroni R, Manitto MP, Martina E, Brancato R, Allikmets R, Ferrari M, Cremonesi L
Denaturing HPLC profiling of the ABCA4 gene for reliable detection of allelic variations.
Clin Chem. 2004 Aug;50(8):1336-43. Epub 2004 Jun 10., [PMID:15192030]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Mutations in the retina-specific ABC transporter (ABCA4) gene have been associated with several forms of macular degenerations. Because the high complexity of the molecular genotype makes scanning of the ABCA4 gene cumbersome, we describe here the first use of denaturing HPLC (DHPLC) to screen for ABCA4 mutations. METHODS: Temperature conditions were designed for all 50 exons based on effective separation of 83 samples carrying 86 sequence variations and 19 mutagenized controls. For validation, samples from 23 previously characterized Stargardt patients were subjected to DHPLC profiling. Subsequently, samples from a cohort of 30 patients affected by various forms of macular degeneration were subjected to DHPLC scanning under the same conditions. RESULTS: DHPLC profiling not only identified all 132 sequence alterations previously detected by double-gradient denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis but also identified 5 sequence alterations that this approach had missed. Moreover, DHPLC scanning of an additional panel of 30 previously untested patients led to the identification of 26 different mutations and 29 polymorphisms, accounting for 203 sequence variations on 29 of the 30 patients screened. In total, the DHPLC approach allowed us to identify 16 mutations that had never been reported before. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide strong support for the use of DHPLC for molecular characterization of the ABCA4 gene.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
35 Exon Genotypesa Exon Genotypesa 1b M1V (1A>G) (11) 24 3523-28TϾC (12) R18W (52C>T) (11) 25 G1203D (3608G>A)b 3 250_251insCAAA (7) 27 R1300X (3898C>T) (12) N96K (288C>A) R1300Q (3899G>A) (11) 302 ϩ 26 GϾA (13) 28 P1380L (4139CϾT) (14) 4 P143L (428C>T) (10) P1401P (4203CϾA) (15) 5 R152Q (455G>A) (4) 4253 ϩ 43GϾA (12) 6 571-1GϾT (4) 29 4253 ϩ 13GϾA (12) R212H (635G>A) (16) 4354-38GϾA (4) C230S (688T>A) (12) 30a 4466 ϩ 3GϾA (4) 641delG (9) 30b C1490Y (4469G>A) (17) 10 1240-14CϾT (13) P1512R (4535C>G) (4) H423R (1268ϾG) (13) 31 T1526M (4577C>T) (14) 1357 ϩ 11delG (16) 33/34 A1598D (4793C>A) (4) H423H (1269CϾT) (13) 35 4947delC (14) 11 1387delTT (4) 5018 ؉ 2T>C (7) R500R (1500GϾA) (4) 39 H1838Y (5512C>T) (14) 12 L541P (1622T>C) (14) 40 N1868I (5603AϾT) (13) R572Q (1715G>A) (17) L1894L (5682GϾC) (15) 13 Y639X (1917C>G) (17) 5714 ؉ 5G>A C641S (1922G>C) (4) 41 L1938L (5814AϾG) (12) 14 R653C (1957C>T) (12) 42 5836-43CϾA W700X (2099G>A) (4) 5836-11GϾA (15) 3607 ϩ 49TϾC P1948I (5843CϾT) (15) 15 V767D (2300T>A) (7) P1948P (5844AϾG) (15) 16 W821R (2461T>A) (14) G1961E (5882G>A) (14) 17 2588-33CϾTb 43 L1970F (5908C>T) (11) G863A (2588G>C) (17) 44 6006-16AϾG (16) 18 2654-36CϾT (4) I2023I (6069CϾT) (14) T897I (2690C>T) (7) L2027F (6079C>T) (14) 19 R943Q (2828GϾA) (13) 45 V2050L (6148G>C) (14) Y954D (2860T>G) (4) 46 R2107H (6320G>A) (18) N965S (2894A>G) (14) 6386 ؉ 2G>C (10) 20 G978D (2933G>A) (4) 47 R2139W (6415C>T) (14) L988L (2964CϾT) (4) R2149L (6446G>T) (4) 21 E1022K (3064G>A) (4) C2150Y (6449G>A) (19) A1038V (3113C>T) (14) 48 D2177N (6529G>A) (17) G1050D (3149G>A) (4) L2241V (6721C>G) (12) 3211_3212insGT (14) 6729 ϩ 21CϾT (15) 22 E1087K (3259G>A) (14) 49 6730-3TϾC (15) R1098C (3292C>T) (12) S2255I (6764GϾT) (13) S1099P (3295T>C) (4) 6816 ϩ 28GϾC (4) R1108C (3322C>T) (14) R1129L (3386G>T) (17) a Bold indicates disease-causing mutations. Login to comment
34 Exon Genotypesa Exon Genotypesa 1b M1V (1A>G) (11) 24 3523-28Tb0e;C (12) R18W (52C>T) (11) 25 G1203D (3608G>A)b 3 250_251insCAAA (7) 27 R1300X (3898C>T) (12) N96K (288C>A) R1300Q (3899G>A) (11) 302 af9; 26 Gb0e;A (13) 28 P1380L (4139Cb0e;T) (14) 4 P143L (428C>T) (10) P1401P (4203Cb0e;A) (15) 5 R152Q (455G>A) (4) 4253 af9; 43Gb0e;A (12) 6 571-1Gb0e;T (4) 29 4253 af9; 13Gb0e;A (12) R212H (635G>A) (16) 4354-38Gb0e;A (4) C230S (688T>A) (12) 30a 4466 af9; 3Gb0e;A (4) 641delG (9) 30b C1490Y (4469G>A) (17) 10 1240-14Cb0e;T (13) P1512R (4535C>G) (4) H423R (1268b0e;G) (13) 31 T1526M (4577C>T) (14) 1357 af9; 11delG (16) 33/34 A1598D (4793C>A) (4) H423H (1269Cb0e;T) (13) 35 4947delC (14) 11 1387delTT (4) 5018 d19; 2T>C (7) R500R (1500Gb0e;A) (4) 39 H1838Y (5512C>T) (14) 12 L541P (1622T>C) (14) 40 N1868I (5603Ab0e;T) (13) R572Q (1715G>A) (17) L1894L (5682Gb0e;C) (15) 13 Y639X (1917C>G) (17) 5714 d19; 5G>A C641S (1922G>C) (4) 41 L1938L (5814Ab0e;G) (12) 14 R653C (1957C>T) (12) 42 5836-43Cb0e;A W700X (2099G>A) (4) 5836-11Gb0e;A (15) 3607 af9; 49Tb0e;C P1948I (5843Cb0e;T) (15) 15 V767D (2300T>A) (7) P1948P (5844Ab0e;G) (15) 16 W821R (2461T>A) (14) G1961E (5882G>A) (14) 17 2588-33Cb0e;Tb 43 L1970F (5908C>T) (11) G863A (2588G>C) (17) 44 6006-16Ab0e;G (16) 18 2654-36Cb0e;T (4) I2023I (6069Cb0e;T) (14) T897I (2690C>T) (7) L2027F (6079C>T) (14) 19 R943Q (2828Gb0e;A) (13) 45 V2050L (6148G>C) (14) Y954D (2860T>G) (4) 46 R2107H (6320G>A) (18) N965S (2894A>G) (14) 6386 d19; 2G>C (10) 20 G978D (2933G>A) (4) 47 R2139W (6415C>T) (14) L988L (2964Cb0e;T) (4) R2149L (6446G>T) (4) 21 E1022K (3064G>A) (4) C2150Y (6449G>A) (19) A1038V (3113C>T) (14) 48 D2177N (6529G>A) (17) G1050D (3149G>A) (4) L2241V (6721C>G) (12) 3211_3212insGT (14) 6729 af9; 21Cb0e;T (15) 22 E1087K (3259G>A) (14) 49 6730-3Tb0e;C (15) R1098C (3292C>T) (12) S2255I (6764Gb0e;T) (13) S1099P (3295T>C) (4) 6816 af9; 28Gb0e;C (4) R1108C (3322C>T) (14) R1129L (3386G>T) (17) a Bold indicates disease-causing mutations. Login to comment

[hide] The ABCA4 gene in autosomal recessive cone-rod dys... Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Dec;71(6):1480-2. Ducroq D, Rozet JM, Gerber S, Perrault I, Barbet D, Hanein S, Hakiki S, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Hamel C, Kaplan J
The ABCA4 gene in autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophies.
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Dec;71(6):1480-2., [PMID:12515255]

Abstract [show]

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
30 Among these 13 patients, 2 were homozygotes (from two consanguineous families), 4 were compound heterozygotes, and 7 were Letters to the Editor 1481 Table 1 ABCA4 Mutations in Patients with CRD Patient ABCA4 ALLELE 1 ABCA4 ALLELE 2 OriginNucleotide Change Effect Nucleotide Change Effect 16 AAC 286 GAC N96D - - France 52 ATC 466 GTC I156V - - North Africa 57 ATC 466 GTC I156V GGG 1819 AGG G607R North Africa 51 CGA 455 CAA 5084ϩ1G/A R152Q Frameshift CGC 3323 TGC AGT 6764 ATT R1108C S2256I France 11 CGT 764 TGT R255C - - France 41 GCC 3113 GTC A1038V - - France 60 CTG 3602 CGG L1201R AGT 6764 ATT S2256I South Africa 21 CTC 5908 TTC L1970F - - France 30 AGT 6764 ATT S2256I - - Africa 48 GAA 3259 TAA E1087X - - France 2 2617 del CT Frameshift 2617 del CT Frameshift Portugal 5 571-2A/G Frameshift 571-2A/G Frameshift Morocco 61 CGG 4918 TGG R1602W GGC 5929 AGC G1977S England single heterozygotes (see table 1). Login to comment
31 Among these 13 patients, 2 were homozygotes (from two consanguineous families), 4 were compound heterozygotes, and 7 were Letters to the Editor 1481 Table 1 ABCA4 Mutations in Patients with CRD Patient ABCA4 ALLELE 1 ABCA4 ALLELE 2 Origin Nucleotide Change Effect Nucleotide Change Effect 16 AAC 286 GAC N96D - - France 52 ATC 466 GTC I156V - - North Africa 57 ATC 466 GTC I156V GGG 1819 AGG G607R North Africa 51 CGA 455 CAA 5084af9;1G/A R152Q Frameshift CGC 3323 TGC AGT 6764 ATT R1108C S2256I France 11 CGT 764 TGT R255C - - France 41 GCC 3113 GTC A1038V - - France 60 CTG 3602 CGG L1201R AGT 6764 ATT S2256I South Africa 21 CTC 5908 TTC L1970F - - France 30 AGT 6764 ATT S2256I - - Africa 48 GAA 3259 TAA E1087X - - France 2 2617 del CT Frameshift 2617 del CT Frameshift Portugal 5 571-2A/G Frameshift 571-2A/G Frameshift Morocco 61 CGG 4918 TGG R1602W GGC 5929 AGC G1977S England single heterozygotes (see table 1). Login to comment

[hide] Genotype-phenotype analysis of ABCR variants in ma... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Feb;43(2):466-73. Bernstein PS, Leppert M, Singh N, Dean M, Lewis RA, Lupski JR, Allikmets R, Seddon JM
Genotype-phenotype analysis of ABCR variants in macular degeneration probands and siblings.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Feb;43(2):466-73., [PMID:11818392]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Single-copy variants of the autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) gene ABCR (ABCA4) have been shown to confer enhanced susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). To investigate the role of ABCR alleles in AMD further, genotype-phenotype analysis was performed on siblings of patients with AMD who had known ABCR variants. This genetically related population provides a cohort of subjects with similar age and ethnic background for genotype-phenotype comparison to the original probands. METHODS: All available siblings of 26 probands carrying probable disease-associated ABCR variants were examined clinically. Blood samples were collected from these siblings for genotype analysis to search for the ABCR variant alleles corresponding to the isofamilial proband. RESULTS: Nineteen of 33 siblings from 15 families carried the respective proband's variant ABCR allele. Some families exhibited concordance of ABCR alleles with macular degeneration phenotype, but others did not. Exudative AMD was uncommon among both probands and siblings. CONCLUSIONS: Although population studies have indicated that some ABCR variant alleles may enhance susceptibility to AMD, investigation of the extent of ABCR involvement by kindred analysis is complicated by a plethora of environmental and other hereditary factors not investigated in the current study that may also play important roles.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
52 AMD Grade of Probands Carrying Heterozygous ABCR Variants ABCR Variant Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 E471K 0 0 1 1 0 P940R* 0 0 0 1 0 T1428M 0 0 1 0 0 R1517S 0 0 0 1 0 I1562T 0 0 1 1 0 G1578R 0 0 1 0 0 5196ϩ1G3A 0 0 1 0 0 R1898H 0 0 0 1 0 G1961E 0 0 2 4 0 L1970F 0 0 1 0 0 6519⌬11bp 0 0 0 1 0 D2177N 0 1 3 3 0 6568⌬C 0 0 0 0 1 Data are number of probands at each grade. Login to comment

[hide] Cosegregation and functional analysis of mutant AB... Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Nov 1;10(23):2671-8. Shroyer NF, Lewis RA, Yatsenko AN, Wensel TG, Lupski JR
Cosegregation and functional analysis of mutant ABCR (ABCA4) alleles in families that manifest both Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.
Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Nov 1;10(23):2671-8., [PMID:11726554]

Abstract [show]
Mutations in ABCR (ABCA4) have been reported to cause a spectrum of autosomal recessively inherited retinopathies, including Stargardt disease (STGD), cone-rod dystrophy and retinitis pigmentosa. Individuals heterozygous for ABCR mutations may be predisposed to develop the multifactorial disorder age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We hypothesized that some carriers of STGD alleles have an increased risk to develop AMD. We tested this hypothesis in a cohort of families that manifest both STGD and AMD. With a direct-sequencing mutation detection strategy, we found that AMD-affected relatives of STGD patients are more likely to be carriers of pathogenic STGD alleles than predicted based on chance alone. We further investigated the role of AMD-associated ABCR mutations by testing for expression and ATP-binding defects in an in vitro biochemical assay. We found that mutations associated with AMD have a range of assayable defects ranging from no detectable defect to apparent null alleles. Of the 21 missense ABCR mutations reported in patients with AMD, 16 (76%) show abnormalities in protein expression, ATP-binding or ATPase activity. We infer that carrier relatives of STGD patients are predisposed to develop AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
116 To analyze the function of AMD-associated ABCR mutations, we characterized the effects of seven different missense mutations (D645N, T901A, T1428M, R1517S, I1562T, G1578R and L1970F) on protein expression and ATP binding. Login to comment
118 These results are intriguing because none of the tested mutations is within either the Walker A or B nucleotide-binding domains (the alteration L1970F is adjacent to the second Walker A motif). Login to comment

[hide] Mutational scanning of the ABCR gene with double-g... Hum Genet. 2001 Sep;109(3):326-38. Fumagalli A, Ferrari M, Soriani N, Gessi A, Foglieni B, Martina E, Manitto MP, Brancato R, Dean M, Allikmets R, Cremonesi L
Mutational scanning of the ABCR gene with double-gradient denaturing-gradient gel electrophoresis (DG-DGGE) in Italian Stargardt disease patients.
Hum Genet. 2001 Sep;109(3):326-38., [PMID:11702214]

Abstract [show]
Mutations in the retina-specific ABC transporter (ABCR) gene are responsible for autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (arSTGD). Mutation detection efficiency in ABCR in arSTGD patients ranges between 30% and 66% in previously published studies, because of high allelic heterogeneity and technical limitations of the employed methods. Conditions were developed to screen the ABCR gene by double-gradient denaturing-gradient gel electrophoresis. The efficacy of this method was evaluated by analysis of DNA samples with previously characterized ABCR mutations. This approach was applied to mutation detection in 44 Italian arSTGD patients corresponding to 36 independent genomes, in order to assess the nature and frequency of the ABCR mutations in this ethnic group. In 34 of 36 (94.4%) STGD patients, 37 sequence changes were identified, including 26 missense, six frameshift, three splicing, and two nonsense variations. Among these, 20 had not been previously described. Several polymorphisms were detected in affected individuals and in matched controls. Our findings extend the spectrum of mutations identified in STGD patients and suggest the existence of a subset of molecular defects specific to the Italian population. The identification of at least two disease-associated mutations in four healthy control individuals indicates a higher than expected carrier frequency of variant ABCR alleles in the general population. Genotype-phenotype analysis in our series showed a possible correlation between the nature and location of some mutations and specific ophthalmoscopic features of STGD disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
37 DNA samples (n=22) carrying previously identified mutations in the ABCR gene were employed as controls for evaluating the efficacy of the DG-DGGE approach in detecting sequence variations R572Q (Lewis et al. 1999), Y639X (Lewis et al. 1999), G863A (Lewis et al. 1999; Maugeri et al. 1999), A1038V (Rozet et al. 1998), T1019M (Rozet et al. 1998), 3211insGT (Lewis et al. 1999), P1380L (Lewis et al. 1999), H1406Y (Lewis et al. 1999), 4947delC (Lewis et al. 1999), H1838Y (Lewis et al. 1999), 5714+5G→A (Cremers et al. 1998), N1868I (De La Paz et al. 1999), L1938L (Rivera et al. 2000), G1961E (Allikmets et al. 1997a, 1997b), L1970F (Lewis et al. 1999), L2027F (Nasonkin et al. 1998), V2050L (Lewis et al. 1999), E2131K (Lewis et al. 1999), R2139W (Lewis et al. 1999), 6709insG (Lewis et al. 1999), D2177N (Allikmets et al. 1997a, 1997b), 2181del12 (Lewis et al. 1999). Login to comment

[hide] An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89. Webster AR, Heon E, Lotery AJ, Vandenburgh K, Casavant TL, Oh KT, Beck G, Fishman GA, Lam BL, Levin A, Heckenlively JR, Jacobson SG, Weleber RG, Sheffield VC, Stone EM
An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89., [PMID:11328725]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess the allelic variation of the ATP-binding transporter protein (ABCA4). METHODS: A combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and automated DNA sequencing was used to systematically screen this gene for sequence variations in 374 unrelated probands with a clinical diagnosis of Stargardt disease, 182 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 96 normal subjects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of any single variant or class of variant between the control and AMD groups. In contrast, truncating variants, amino acid substitutions, synonymous codon changes, and intronic variants were significantly enriched in patients with Stargardt disease when compared with their presence in subjects without Stargardt disease (Kruskal-Wallis P < 0.0001 for each variant group). Overall, there were 2480 instances of 213 different variants in the ABCA4 gene, including 589 instances of 97 amino acid substitutions, and 45 instances of 33 truncating variants. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 97 amino acid substitutions, 11 occurred at a frequency that made them unlikely to be high-penetrance recessive disease-causing variants (HPRDCV). After accounting for variants in cis, one or more changes that were compatible with HPRDCV were found on 35% of all Stargardt-associated alleles overall. The nucleotide diversity of the ABCA4 coding region, a collective measure of the number and prevalence of polymorphic sites in a region of DNA, was found to be 1.28, a value that is 9 to 400 times greater than that of two other macular disease genes that were examined in a similar fashion (VMD2 and EFEMP1).

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
102 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 2 160 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 Ͻ0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4353 - 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4539 ϩ 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 Ͻ0.01 39 5584 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5714 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu Ͻ0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 Ͻ0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 Ͻ0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 Ͻ0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6729 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment
103 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 2 160 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 b0d;0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4353 afa; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4539 af9; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 b0d;0.01 39 5584 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5714 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu b0d;0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 b0d;0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 b0d;0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 b0d;0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6729 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment

[hide] A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in th... Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct;67(4):800-13. Epub 2000 Aug 24. Rivera A, White K, Stohr H, Steiner K, Hemmrich N, Grimm T, Jurklies B, Lorenz B, Scholl HP, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Weber BH
A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene in Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct;67(4):800-13. Epub 2000 Aug 24., [PMID:10958763]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease (STGD) is a common autosomal recessive maculopathy of early and young-adult onset and is caused by alterations in the gene encoding the photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter (ABCA4). We have studied 144 patients with STGD and 220 unaffected individuals ascertained from the German population, to complete a comprehensive, population-specific survey of the sequence variation in the ABCA4 gene. In addition, we have assessed the proposed role for ABCA4 in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a common cause of late-onset blindness, by studying 200 affected individuals with late-stage disease. Using a screening strategy based primarily on denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, we have identified in the three study groups a total of 127 unique alterations, of which 90 have not been previously reported, and have classified 72 as probable pathogenic mutations. Of the 288 STGD chromosomes studied, mutations were identified in 166, resulting in a detection rate of approximately 58%. Eight different alleles account for 61% of the identified disease alleles, and at least one of these, the L541P-A1038V complex allele, appears to be a founder mutation in the German population. When the group with AMD and the control group were analyzed with the same methodology, 18 patients with AMD and 12 controls were found to harbor possible disease-associated alterations. This represents no significant difference between the two groups; however, for detection of modest effects of rare alleles in complex diseases, the analysis of larger cohorts of patients may be required.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
82 Table 3 Rare Sequence Variants in the ABCA4 Gene EXON AND NUCLEOTIDE CHANGE EFFECT NO. OF ALLELES REFERENCE(S) STGD (288) AMD (400) Control (440) 5: 455GrA R152Q 3 1 3 This study 8: IVS8ϩ38ArT Unknown 0 1 0 This study 12: 1654GrA V552I 0 0 2 This study IVS11-6CrG Unknown 0 4 2 This study 13: 1932CrT D644D 2 0 0 This study 17: IVS16-12CrG Unknown 0 0 8 This study 18: IVS17-56CrG Unknown 3 0 0 This study IVS17-36CrT Unknown 0 2 1 This study 22: 3261ArC E1087D 1 0 0 This study 3264CrT P1088P 0 0 1 This study IVS21-20CrT Unknown 1 0 0 This study 23: IVS23ϩ10TrG Unknown 1 0 0 This study IVS23ϩ17GrC Unknown 1 0 0 This study 24: IVS23-28TrC Unknown 2 4 1 This study 25: 3759GrA T1253T 1 0 0 This study 28: 4140GrA P1380P 2 0 0 This study IVS28ϩ43GrA Unknown 4 3 1 This study 29: IVS29ϩ13GrA Unknown 0 1 0 This study IVS29ϩ32ArG Unknown 1 0 0 This study 31: 4578GrA T1526T 0 1 0 This study 32: IVS32ϩ45TrC Unknown 1 0 0 This study 33: IVS32-57TrG Unknown 0 0 1 This study 4685TrC I1562T 0 0 6 Allikmets et al. (1997b) 36: IVS36ϩ20GrA Unknown 1 0 0 This study 39: 5487GrT L1829L 0 0 1 This study IVS38-10TrC Unknown 9 0 0 Maugeri et al. (1999) 41: 5761GrA V1921M 1 1 1 This study 43: 5908CrT L1970F 1 0 1 Allikmets et al. (1997b), Rozet et al. (1998), Lewis et al. (1999) IVS43ϩ7ArC Unknown 1 0 0 This study 44: 6027CrT I2023I 1 0 0 Allikmets et al. (1997a), Nasonkin et al. (1998) 45: 6176GrC G2059A 0 0 1 This study 46: IVS46ϩ27GrA Unknown 0 0 1 This study 47: IVS46-46TrA Unknown 1 0 0 This study 48: IVS48ϩ21CrT Unknown 18a 2a 0 Allikmets et al. (1997b), Nasonkin et al. (1998), Papaioannou et al. (2000) 6529GrA D2177N 2 3 4 Allikmets et al. (1997b) 6721CrG L2241V 1 0 0 This study a Occurs together with G1961E in 17/18 and 2/2 instances. Login to comment
142 As well as changes not affecting the specificity of amino acid residues and conservative amino acid substitutions, included in the latter category are some rare nonconservative changes found in similar frequencies in the three study groups-for example, R152Q, V1921M, and L1970F. Login to comment

[hide] Molecular genetic analysis of ABCR gene in Japanes... Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000 May-Jun;44(3):245-9. Fuse N, Suzuki T, Wada Y, Yoshida M, Shimura M, Abe T, Nakazawa M, Tamai M
Molecular genetic analysis of ABCR gene in Japanese dry form age-related macular degeneration.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000 May-Jun;44(3):245-9., [PMID:10913642]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To explore whether the mutation in the retina-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCR) gene, the Stargardt's disease gene, contributes to the prevalence of the dry form of age-related macular degeneration (dry AMD) in Japanese unrelated patients. METHODS: Twenty-five Japanese unrelated patients with dry AMD who were diagnosed by fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography were chosen as the dry AMD group. None of these cases had apparent choroidal neovascularization. To detect the mutations in the ABCR gene, genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes of peripheral blood, and 26 exons of the ABCR gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All the PCR products were then directly sequenced. When a mutation was detected, the occurrence of a mutation was compared between these AMD patients and the control group. RESULTS: After direct sequencing, a point mutation in exon 29 was found in one of the 25 dry AMD patients. In addition, a polymorphism in exon 45 was found in two other patients, and three sequence variations in exon 23 were detected in all patients. The incidence in AMD patients in whom a mutation in exon 29 (4%) was detected was less than that in controls (5%). Screening of the intron-exon boundaries also led to the identification of intronic mutation in intron 33. CONCLUSION: In this study we found no relationship between allelic variation in the ABCR gene and the prevalence of dry AMD in Japanese unrelated patients.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
31 Mutations Found in ABCR* Gene in 26 Exons Examined in This Study Exon AMD† Stargardt`s Disease Exon AMD Stargardt`s Disease 11 E471K 29 T1428M 15 31 R1517S 16 G818E, G863A (D847H) 33 I1562T G1578R 17 34 N1614FS 18 35 19 V931M, 2884delC N965M, (R943Q) 36 5196ϩ1G→A 5041deL15 5196ϩ2T→C 20 40 R1898H R1898H 21 A1028V 42 G1961E G1961E 22 3211insGT, V1072A E1087K 43 L1970F 6006ϩ1G→T 23 R1129L 44 L2027F, R2038W (I2023I) 24 45 V2050L, R2077W (I2083I) 25 46 R2106C (V2094V) 27 48 6519⌬11bp D2177N 6568⌬C 6519⌬11bp 6709insG *ABCR: ATP-binding cassette transporter. Login to comment

[hide] ABCR gene analysis in familial exudative age-relat... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jan;41(1):244-7. Souied EH, Ducroq D, Rozet JM, Gerber S, Perrault I, Munnich A, Coscas G, Soubrane G, Kaplan J
ABCR gene analysis in familial exudative age-related macular degeneration.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jan;41(1):244-7., [PMID:10634626]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Identification of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is of crucial importance in this common cause of blindness. Mutations in the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) were previously reported in patients with atrophic forms of AMD. The purpose of this study was to analyze familial segregation of ABCR gene mutations in 52 unrelated multiplex cases of exudative AMD. METHODS: A complete ophthalmological examination including visual acuity measurement, fundus examination, and fluorescein angiography (FA) was performed on each exudative AMD patient. The entire coding sequence of the ABCR gene was analyzed using a combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism and confirmatory sequencing of the exons showing an abnormal pattern of migration. RESULTS: Six heterozygous missense changes were identified. A lack of familial segregation was observed in 4 of 6 codon changes (Arg943Gln, Val1433Ile, Pro1948Leu, and Ser2255Ile). Conversely, 2 codon changes cosegregated with the disease in 2 small families: Pro940Arg and Leu1970Phe. CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that segregation of the ABCR gene mutations with familial cases of AMD has not yet been shown. The analysis of familial segregation allowed the authors to exclude 4 of 6 codon changes as disease-causing mutations. Furthermore, it was shown here that the ABCR gene may be rarely involved in exudative AMD, with at best 2 of 52 familial cases (4%) related to this susceptibility factor.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
9 Conversely, 2 codon changes cosegregated with the disease in 2 small families: Pro940Arg and Leu1970Phe. Login to comment
40 The heterozygous codon changes observed were Pro940Arg, Arg943Gln (2 families), Pro1948Leu (2 families), Leu1970Phe, Val1433Ile, and Ser2255Ile. Login to comment
42 Conversely, the Pro940Arg, Val1433Ile, and Leu1970Phe changes were not found in the control group. Login to comment
48 An association of the mutations with the disease was observed in the 2 small families harboring 2 mutations absent in controls: Pro940Arg and Leu1970Phe (Fig. Login to comment
56 Pedigrees of the 2 families presenting the Pro940Arg and Leu1970Phe codon changes. Login to comment
69 Second, for Pro940Arg and Leu1970Phe we observed possible segregation with AMD. However, the families were too small to draw any definite conclusions about causality because only one generation could be analyzed. Login to comment
72 The Pro940Arg and the Leu1970Phe codon changes occur in codons adjacent to the first and second ATP-binding sites, respectively. Login to comment
74 The Leu1970Phe mutation has been observed in compound heterozygous Stargardt patients so that this mutation is presumed to induce important ABCR protein alterations.18 This mutation was also previously identified in one case of AMD but not observed in the general population (n ϭ 220).19 To the best of our knowledge, the Pro940Arg mutation has not been reported previously. Login to comment

[hide] Analysis of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in a... Ophthalmology. 1999 Aug;106(8):1531-6. De La Paz MA, Guy VK, Abou-Donia S, Heinis R, Bracken B, Vance JM, Gilbert JR, Gass JD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA
Analysis of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in age-related macular degeneration.
Ophthalmology. 1999 Aug;106(8):1531-6., [PMID:10442900]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a complex genetic disorder and the leading cause of severe vision loss in the elderly. The Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) has been proposed as a major genetic risk factor in AMD. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the authors' AMD population for the specific ABCR variants proposed previously as genetic risk factors for AMD. METHODS: The authors screened their AMD population (159 familial cases from 112 multiplex families and 53 sporadic cases) and 56 racially matched individuals with no known history of AMD from the same clinic population for evidence of the ABCR variants. Grading of disease severity was performed according to a standard protocol. Patients with extensive intermediate drusen or large soft drusen, drusenoid retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) detachments, geographic atrophy of the RPE, or evidence of exudative maculopathy were considered affected. Analysis for variants was performed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of individual exons of the ABCR gene with flanking primers and a combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism, heteroduplex analysis, and high-performance liquid chromatography. All abnormal conformers detected using these techniques were characterized by direct sequencing. RESULTS: The authors identified only two of the previously reported variants in their study population. Both variants occurred in sporadic cases, and none was found in familial cases or the randomly selected population. In addition, the authors identified several newly described polymorphisms and variants in both the AMD and control populations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these initial findings, the authors suggest that ABCR is not a major genetic risk factor for AMD in their study population. Additional genetic studies are needed to more fully evaluate the role of ABCR in AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
107 Number of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Cases with Variants* Mutation Duke (n ‫؍‬ 169)† D2177N 2 (1.2%) E471K 0 R1129L 0 T1428M 0 R1517S 0 I1562T 0 G1578R 0 5169 ϩ 1G 3 A 0 R1898H 0 G1961E 0 L1970F 0 6519⌬11bp 0 6568⌬C 0 Total 2 (1.2%) * Variants considered to be associated with the genetic etiology of AMD by Allikmets et al.31 † Independent cases are determined by counting 1 familial AMD case from each of the 112 families and adding the 57 sporadic AMD cases, for a total of 169 cases. Login to comment

[hide] The rod photoreceptor ATP-binding cassette transpo... Vision Res. 1999 Jul;39(15):2537-44. Shroyer NF, Lewis RA, Allikmets R, Singh N, Dean M, Leppert M, Lupski JR
The rod photoreceptor ATP-binding cassette transporter gene, ABCR, and retinal disease: from monogenic to multifactorial.
Vision Res. 1999 Jul;39(15):2537-44., [PMID:10396622]

Abstract [show]
The ABCR gene encodes a rod photoreceptor specific ATP-binding cassette transporter. Mutations in ABCR are associated with at least four inherited retinal dystrophies: Stargardt disease, Fundus Flavimaculatus, cone-rod dystrophy, and retinitis pigmentosa. A statistically significant increase in heterozygous ABCR alterations has been identified in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A pedigree is described which manifests both Stargardt disease and AMD in which an ABCR mutation cosegregates with both disease phenotypes. These data from this case report support the hypothesis that ABCR is a dominant susceptibility locus for AMD. Recent work regarding ABCR is reviewed and a model is presented in which decreased ABCR function correlates with severity of retinal disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
142 Conclusions We reported elsewhere that seven alterations in ABCR (R1898H, G1961E, 6519del11bp, E471K, R1129L, 5196+1GA, and L1970F) are associated with STGD in compound heterozygous states and with AMD in an apparent heterozygous state (Allikmets et al., 1997a; Lewis et al., 1999). Login to comment
143 In addition, we previously showed that the most common mutant ABCR allele (G1961E) identified in a cohort of 150 families was also one of the most frequently identified disease associated ABCR alterations in a cohort of 167 AMD patients (Allikmets et al., 1997a; Lewis et al., 1999). Login to comment

[hide] Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-spe... Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34. Lewis RA, Shroyer NF, Singh N, Allikmets R, Hutchinson A, Li Y, Lupski JR, Leppert M, Dean M
Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter gene, ABCR, in Stargardt disease.
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34., [PMID:9973280]

Abstract [show]
Mutation scanning and direct DNA sequencing of all 50 exons of ABCR were completed for 150 families segregating recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). ABCR variations were identified in 173 (57%) disease chromosomes, the majority of which represent missense amino acid substitutions. These ABCR variants were not found in 220 unaffected control individuals (440 chromosomes) but do cosegregate with the disease in these families with STGD1, and many occur in conserved functional domains. Missense amino acid substitutions located in the amino terminal one-third of the protein appear to be associated with earlier onset of the disease and may represent misfolding alleles. The two most common mutant alleles, G1961E and A1038V, each identified in 16 of 173 disease chromosomes, composed 18.5% of mutations identified. G1961E has been associated previously, at a statistically significant level in the heterozygous state, with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Clinical evaluation of these 150 families with STGD1 revealed a high frequency of AMD in first- and second-degree relatives. These findings support the hypothesis that compound heterozygous ABCR mutations are responsible for STGD1 and that some heterozygous ABCR mutations may enhance susceptibility to AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
76 2 0071GrA R24H 1 19 2894ArG N965S 3 36 5196ϩ1GrA Splice 2 3 0161GrA C54Y 1 21 3113CrT A1038V 16 5196ϩ2TrC Splice 1 0179CrT A60V 1 22 3211insGT FS 1 37 5281del9 PAL1761del 1 0203CrG P68R 1 3212CrT S1071L 1 38 5459GrC R1820P 1 0223TrG C75G 1 3215TrC V1072A 1 39 5512CrT H1838Y 1 6 0634CrT R212C 1 3259GrA E1087K 1 5527CrT R1843W 1 0664del13 FS 1 3322CrT R1108C 6 40 5585-1GrA Splice 1 0746ArG D249G 1 23 3364GrA E1122K 1 5657GrA G1886E 1 8 1007CrG S336C 1 3385GrT R1129C 1 5693GrA R1898H 4 1018TrG Y340D 1 3386GrT R1129L 2 5714ϩ5GrA Splice 8 11 1411GrA E471K 1 24 3602TrG L1201R 1 42 5882GrA G1961E 16 12 1569TrG D523E 1 25 3610GrA D1204N 1 5898ϩ1GrT Splice 3 1622TrC L541P 1 28 4139CrT P1380L 4 43 5908CrT L1970F 1 1715GrA R572Q 2 4216CrT H1406Y 1 5929GrA G1977S 1 1715GrC R572P 1 4222TrC W1408R 4 6005ϩ1GrT Splice 1 13 1804CrT R602W 1 4232insTATG FS 1 44 6079CrT L2027F 11 1822TrA F608I 2 4253ϩ5GrT Splice 1 6088CrT R2030X 1 1917CrA Y639X 1 29 4297GrA V1433I 1 6089GrA R2030Q 1 1933GrA D645N 1 4316GrA G1439D 2 6112CrT R2038W 1 14 2005delAT FS 1 4319TrC F1440S 1 45 6148GrC V2050L 2 2090GrA W697X 1 4346GrA W1449X 1 6166ArT K2056X 1 2160ϩ1GrC Splice 1 30a 4462TrC C1488R 2 6229CrT R2077W 1 16 2453GrA G818E 1 4457CrT P1486L 1 46 6286GrA E2096K 1 2461TrA W821R 1 30b 4469GrA C1490Y 3 6316CrT R2106C 1 2536GrC D846H 1 4539ϩ1GrT Splice 1 47 6391GrA E2131K 1 2552GrC G851D 1 31 4577CrT T1526M 7 6415CrT R2139W 1 17 2588GrC G863A 11 4594GrA D1532N 3 6445CrT R2149X 1 19 2791GrA V931M 2 35 4947delC FS 1 48 6543del36 1181del12 1 2827CrT R943W 1 36 5041del15 VVAIC1681del 2 6709insG FS 1 2884delC FS 1 5087GrA S1696N 1 NOTE.-FS ϭ frameshift. Login to comment
178 Table 2 ABCR Allelic Series MUTATION(S) PEDIGREE AGE AT ONSET (YEARS) MEAN AGE AT ONSET ‫ע‬ SD (YEARS)Allele 1 Allele 2 G863A Y340D, R772Q AR31 8 19.6 ‫ע‬ 12.7 51961GrA AR307 10 A1038V AR290 16 5714ϩ5GrA AR314 25 5898ϩ1GrT AR336 39 A1038V R572P AR321 6 12.5 ‫ע‬ 6.9 S1071L AR358 6 L1970F AR428 6 5196ϩ2TrC AR71 7 G1961E AR417 8 L2027F AR181 9 R1898H AR78 14 G863A AR290 16 G1961E AR274 20 R1108C AR393 20 R1108C AR376 25 P1380L W1408R AR341 6 8.2 ‫ע‬ 1.5 E1122K AR534 8 2005delAT AR357 8 D1532N AR423 9 W821R AR534 10 G1961E A1038V AR417 8 14.3 ‫ע‬ 4.5 C75G AR427 12 C1490Y AR370 13 2160ϩ1GrC AR218 14 4253ϩ5GrT AR373 19 A1038V AR274 20 L2027F R602W AR88 9 13.0 ‫ע‬ 5.5 A1038V AR181 9 R2149X AR263 9 T1526M AR326 19 T1526M AR391 19 (70%) had onset in the first 2 decades of life, but 11 (16%) had onset in the 3d decade and 6 (9%) in the 4th decade. Login to comment
192 Interestingly, four other STGD1-causing ABCR mutations (E471K, R1129L, 5196ϩ1GrA, and L1970F) in these new families were documented previously as AMD-associated ABCR variants (Allikmets et al. 1997a). Login to comment
193 Importantly, the G1961E allele, identified as one of the two most frequent variants in both the Utah and the Boston cohorts of AMD patients (Allikmets et al. 1997a), was also the most frequently identified ABCR mutant allele in our cohort of 150 families with STGD1. Login to comment
77 2 0071GrA R24H 1 19 2894ArG N965S 3 36 5196af9;1GrA Splice 2 3 0161GrA C54Y 1 21 3113CrT A1038V 16 5196af9;2TrC Splice 1 0179CrT A60V 1 22 3211insGT FS 1 37 5281del9 PAL1761del 1 0203CrG P68R 1 3212CrT S1071L 1 38 5459GrC R1820P 1 0223TrG C75G 1 3215TrC V1072A 1 39 5512CrT H1838Y 1 6 0634CrT R212C 1 3259GrA E1087K 1 5527CrT R1843W 1 0664del13 FS 1 3322CrT R1108C 6 40 5585afa;1GrA Splice 1 0746ArG D249G 1 23 3364GrA E1122K 1 5657GrA G1886E 1 8 1007CrG S336C 1 3385GrT R1129C 1 5693GrA R1898H 4 1018TrG Y340D 1 3386GrT R1129L 2 5714af9;5GrA Splice 8 11 1411GrA E471K 1 24 3602TrG L1201R 1 42 5882GrA G1961E 16 12 1569TrG D523E 1 25 3610GrA D1204N 1 5898af9;1GrT Splice 3 1622TrC L541P 1 28 4139CrT P1380L 4 43 5908CrT L1970F 1 1715GrA R572Q 2 4216CrT H1406Y 1 5929GrA G1977S 1 1715GrC R572P 1 4222TrC W1408R 4 6005af9;1GrT Splice 1 13 1804CrT R602W 1 4232insTATG FS 1 44 6079CrT L2027F 11 1822TrA F608I 2 4253af9;5GrT Splice 1 6088CrT R2030X 1 1917CrA Y639X 1 29 4297GrA V1433I 1 6089GrA R2030Q 1 1933GrA D645N 1 4316GrA G1439D 2 6112CrT R2038W 1 14 2005delAT FS 1 4319TrC F1440S 1 45 6148GrC V2050L 2 2090GrA W697X 1 4346GrA W1449X 1 6166ArT K2056X 1 2160af9;1GrC Splice 1 30a 4462TrC C1488R 2 6229CrT R2077W 1 16 2453GrA G818E 1 4457CrT P1486L 1 46 6286GrA E2096K 1 2461TrA W821R 1 30b 4469GrA C1490Y 3 6316CrT R2106C 1 2536GrC D846H 1 4539af9;1GrT Splice 1 47 6391GrA E2131K 1 2552GrC G851D 1 31 4577CrT T1526M 7 6415CrT R2139W 1 17 2588GrC G863A 11 4594GrA D1532N 3 6445CrT R2149X 1 19 2791GrA V931M 2 35 4947delC FS 1 48 6543del36 1181del12 1 2827CrT R943W 1 36 5041del15 VVAIC1681del 2 6709insG FS 1 2884delC FS 1 5087GrA S1696N 1 NOTE.-FS afd; frameshift. Login to comment
179 Table 2 ABCR Allelic Series MUTATION(S) PEDIGREE AGE AT ONSET (YEARS) MEAN AGE AT ONSET cf2; SD (YEARS) Allele 1 Allele 2 G863A Y340D, R772Q AR31 8 19.6 cf2; 12.7 51961GrA AR307 10 A1038V AR290 16 5714af9;5GrA AR314 25 5898af9;1GrT AR336 39 A1038V R572P AR321 6 12.5 cf2; 6.9 S1071L AR358 6 L1970F AR428 6 5196af9;2TrC AR71 7 G1961E AR417 8 L2027F AR181 9 R1898H AR78 14 G863A AR290 16 G1961E AR274 20 R1108C AR393 20 R1108C AR376 25 P1380L W1408R AR341 6 8.2 cf2; 1.5 E1122K AR534 8 2005delAT AR357 8 D1532N AR423 9 W821R AR534 10 G1961E A1038V AR417 8 14.3 cf2; 4.5 C75G AR427 12 C1490Y AR370 13 2160af9;1GrC AR218 14 4253af9;5GrT AR373 19 A1038V AR274 20 L2027F R602W AR88 9 13.0 cf2; 5.5 A1038V AR181 9 R2149X AR263 9 T1526M AR326 19 T1526M AR391 19 (70%) had onset in the first 2 decades of life, but 11 (16%) had onset in the 3d decade and 6 (9%) in the 4th decade. Login to comment

[hide] Mutation of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in a... Science. 1997 Sep 19;277(5333):1805-7. Allikmets R, Shroyer NF, Singh N, Seddon JM, Lewis RA, Bernstein PS, Peiffer A, Zabriskie NA, Li Y, Hutchinson A, Dean M, Lupski JR, Leppert M
Mutation of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in age-related macular degeneration.
Science. 1997 Sep 19;277(5333):1805-7., [PMID:9295268]

Abstract [show]
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of severe central visual impairment among the elderly and is associated both with environmental factors such as smoking and with genetic factors. Here, 167 unrelated AMD patients were screened for alterations in ABCR, a gene that encodes a retinal rod photoreceptor protein and is defective in Stargardt disease, a common hereditary form of macular dystrophy. Thirteen different AMD-associated alterations, both deletions and amino acid substitutions, were found in one allele of ABCR in 26 patients (16%). Identification of ABCR alterations will permit presymptomatic testing of high-risk individuals and may lead to earlier diagnosis of AMD and to new strategies for prevention and therapy.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
99 Mutation AMD (n ϭ167) STGD (n ϭ 98) General population (n ϭ 220) E471K 2 (1.2%) NA 0 (0%) R1129L 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%)* 0 (0%) T1428M 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) R1517S 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) I1562T 2 (1.2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) G1578R 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5196ϩ1G 3 A 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) R1898H 1 (0.6%) 4 (4%) 0 (0%) G1961E 6 (3.6%) 8 (8%) 0 (0%) L1970F 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6519⌬11bp 1 (0.6%)† 1 (1%)† 0 (0%) D2177N 7 (4.2%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.45%) 6568⌬C 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Totals 26 (16%) 13 (13%) 1 (0.45%) *A substitution to a different amino acid (R1129C) was detected in one STGD1 patient. Login to comment
96 Mutation AMD (n 5167) STGD (n 5 98) General population (n 5 220) E471K 2 (1.2%) NA 0 (0%) R1129L 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%)* 0 (0%) T1428M 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) R1517S 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) I1562T 2 (1.2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) G1578R 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 519611G 3 A 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) R1898H 1 (0.6%) 4 (4%) 0 (0%) G1961E 6 (3.6%) 8 (8%) 0 (0%) L1970F 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6519D11bp 1 (0.6%)ߤ 1 (1%)ߤ 0 (0%) D2177N 7 (4.2%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.45%) 6568DC 1 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Totals 26 (16%) 13 (13%) 1 (0.45%) *A substitution to a different amino acid (R1129C) was detected in one STGD1 patient. Login to comment

[hide] A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinica... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15. Fujinami K, Lois N, Davidson AE, Mackay DS, Hogg CR, Stone EM, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Bunce C, Robson AG, Moore AT, Webster AR, Holder GE, Michaelides M
A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinical and electrophysiologic assessment, progression, and genotype correlations.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15., [PMID:23499370]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic natural history of Stargardt disease and correlate with the genotype. DESIGN: Cohort study of 59 patients. METHODS: Clinical history, examination, and electrophysiologic assessment were undertaken in a longitudinal survey. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on electrophysiologic findings, as previously published: Group 1 had dysfunction confined to the macula; Group 2 had macular and generalized cone system dysfunction; and Group 3 had macular and both generalized cone and rod system dysfunction. At baseline, there were 27 patients in Group 1, 17 in Group 2, and 15 in Group 3. Amplitude reduction of >50% in the relevant electroretinogram (ERG) component or a peak time shift of >3 ms for the 30 Hz flicker ERG or bright flash a-wave was considered clinically significant ERG deterioration. Molecular screening of ABCA4 was undertaken. RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 31.7 years, with the mean follow-up interval being 10.5 years. A total of 22% of patients from Group 1 showed ERG group transition during follow-up, with 11% progressing to Group 2 and 11% to Group 3. Forty-seven percent of patients in Group 2 progressed to Group 3. There was clinically significant ERG deterioration in 54% of all subjects: 22% of Group 1, 65% of Group 2, and 100% of Group 3. At least 1 disease-causing ABCA4 variant was identified in 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with initial rod ERG involvement demonstrated clinically significant electrophysiologic deterioration; only 20% of patients with normal full-field ERGs at baseline showed clinically significant progression. Such data assist counseling by providing more accurate prognostic information and are also highly relevant in the design, patient selection, and monitoring of potential therapeutic interventions.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
89 Clinical Data and Molecular Genetic Status of 59 Patients With Stargardt Disease Pt Onset (y) Age (y) logMAR VA Variants Identifieda BL FU BL FU 1 16 17 26 0.0/1.0 0.0/0.48 c.768G>T / p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg943Gln 2 15 17 25 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p. Arg1443His 3 11 18 27 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Trp439* / p.Gly863Ala / p.Leu1970Phe 4 19 21 32 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Leu2027Phe 5 10 22 30 0.48/0.48 1.0/0.78 p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg943Gln / c.5461-10 T>C 6 18 26 37 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Pro1380Phe 7 25 28 40 0.78/1.0 1.3/0.78 ND 8 24 29 38 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Phe418Ser / p.Leu2027Phe 9 24 31 44 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.0 c.4253&#fe;5 G>T / p.Gly1507Arg 10 26 32 44 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Cys1490Tyr / p.Arg2030Gln 11 31 34 46 0.18/0.3 0.6/0.7 ND 12 17 35 47 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Asn96His 13 23 35 45 1.0/0.3 1.0/0.48 p.Gly1513Profs*1554 14 33 37 48 0.18/1.48 1.0/1.3 ND 15 38 40 51 0.18/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Arg2107His 16 42 43 53 0.0/0.0 1.0/1.0 ND 17 22 48 59 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr 18 20 49 59 1.0/0.6 1.0/1.0 p.Pro1380Leu / p.Gly1961Glu 19 35 50 61 1.0/0.3 1.0/1.0 p.Arg1108Cys 20 25 56 67 1.3/0.18 1.0/1.0 p.Trp439* / p.Gly863Ala 21 48 59 71 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 p. Ile156 Val / p. Cys1455Arg / p. Phe1839Ser 22 21 22 31 0.3/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Arg2107His 23 21 23 33 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala 24 48 64 73 0.0/1.0 0.18/3.0 p.Tyr1652* 25 17 19 29 0.78/0.3 1.0/1.0 c.5461-10 T>C 26 17 21 33 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 ND 27 27 53 66 1.78/1.78 1.3/1.0 p.Ser1071Cysfs*1084 28 5 14 21 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Arg408* / p.Val675lle 29 9 15 27 1.08/1.08 1.0/1.0 p.Cys2150Tyr 30 14 24 32 1.0/0.78 1.0/1.0 ND 31 18 28 39 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala / p.Arg1108Cys / p.Arg943Gln 32 14 29 37 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Arg653Cys / p.Arg2030Gln 33 19 29 40 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.08 ND 34 34 40 49 0.3/0.48 1.0/1.0 p.Gly863Ala / p.Glu1087Lys 35 25 43 54 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr / p.Gly863Ala 36 38 60 69 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.08 p.Val931Met / c.5461-10 T>C 37 10 11 20 1.0/0.78 1.3/1.3 p.Pro1380Leu 38 10 15 23 1.0/1.0 1.3/1.3 p.Ser1071Cysfs*1084 / p.Pro1380Leu 39 24 25 38 1.56/0.3 2.0/2.0 c.5461-10 T>C / c.5714&#fe;5 G>A 40 18 26 36 1.3/1.3 2.0/1.3 ND 41 32 33 45 0.48/0.48 1.0/1.0 ND 42 32 35 46 1.3/0.0 3.0/1.0 p.Cys54Tyr 43 30 35 45 0.48/0.48 2.0/1.3 ND 44 15 41 49 1.3/1.3 2.0/1.3 p.Asn965Ser 45 8 8 20 0.78/0.78 1.0/1.0 p.Thr1019Met 46 10 11 23 1.0/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Thr1019Met 47 8 12 24 2.0/1.56 1.78/1.48 p.Cys2150Tyr 48 17 18 26 1.0/0.78 1.3/1.0 c.5461-10 T>C / p.Leu2027Phe 49 8 21 33 1.3/1.3 2.0/2.0 p.Asp574Aspfs*582 50 8 27 39 2.0/1.56 1.78/1.48 c.5461-10 T>C 51 24 31 43 1.18/1.18 1.08/1.3 p.Arg1640Trp / p.Leu2027Phe Continued on next page respective electrophysiologic traces appear in Figure 2. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disea... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003. Fujinami K, Sergouniotis PI, Davidson AE, Wright G, Chana RK, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Egan CA, Robson AG, Moore AT, Holder GE, Michaelides M, Webster AR
Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disease with preserved foveal structure and function.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003., [PMID:23953153]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease who show a foveal-sparing phenotype. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The foveal-sparing phenotype was defined as foveal preservation on autofluorescence imaging, despite a retinopathy otherwise consistent with Stargardt disease. Forty such individuals were ascertained and a full ophthalmic examination was undertaken. Following mutation screening of ABCA4, the molecular findings were compared with those of patients with Stargardt disease but no foveal sparing. RESULTS: The median age of onset and age at examination of 40 patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype were 43.5 and 46.5 years. The median logMAR visual acuity was 0.18. Twenty-two patients (22/40, 55%) had patchy parafoveal atrophy and flecks; 8 (20%) had numerous flecks at the posterior pole without atrophy; 7 (17.5%) had mottled retinal pigment epithelial changes; 2 (5%) had multiple atrophic lesions, extending beyond the arcades; and 1 (2.5%) had a bull's-eye appearance. The median central foveal thickness assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images was 183.0 mum (n = 33), with outer retinal tubulation observed in 15 (45%). Twenty-two of 33 subjects (67%) had electrophysiological evidence of macular dysfunction without generalized retinal dysfunction. Disease-causing variants were found in 31 patients (31/40, 78%). There was a higher prevalence of the variant p.Arg2030Gln in the cohort with foveal sparing compared to the group with foveal atrophy (6.45% vs 1.07%). CONCLUSIONS: The distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype are described. The presence of 2 distinct phenotypes of Stargardt disease (foveal sparing and foveal atrophy) suggests that there may be more than 1 disease mechanism in ABCA4 retinopathy.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
142 Allele Frequencies of 72 ABCA4 Variants Identified in a Comparison Groupa With the Typical Stargardt Disease (140 Patients Without Evidence of Foveal Sparing on Autofluorescence Imaging) (Continued) Exon Nucleotide Substitution and Amino Acid Change Number of Alleles Allele Frequency Int 33 c.4773&#fe;48C>T 1 0.36% 34 c.4793C>A, p.Ala1598Asp 1 0.36% 35 c.c.4918C>T, p.Arg1640Trp 1 0.36% Int 35 c.5018&#fe;2T>C, Splice site 2 0.71% 36 c.5114G>A, p.Arg1705Gln 2 0.71% 37 c.5222_5233delTGGTGGTGGGC, p.Lys1741Hisfs 1 0.36% 37 c.5281_5289delCTT CCT GCC, p.Pro1761_Leu1763del 2 0.71% Int 38 c.5461-10T>C 23 8.21% Int 39 c.5585-1G>A, Splice site 1 0.36% Int 40 c.5714&#fe;5G>A, Splice site 5 1.79% 42 c.5882G>A, p.Gly1961Glu 17 6.07% 43 c.5908C>T, p.Leu1970Phe 2 0.71% 43 c.5917delG, p.Val1973* 1 0.36% 44 c.6079C>T, p.Leu2027Phe 10 3.57% 44 c.6089G>A, p.Arg2030Gln 3 1.07% 44 c.6118C>T, p.Arg2040* 1 0.36% 45 c.6148G>C, p.Val2050Leu 3 1.43% 46 c.6286G>A, p.Glu2096Lys 1 0.36% 46 c.6320G>A, p.Arg2107His 4 1.43% 47 c.6445C>T, p.Arg2149* 1 0.36% 47 c.6449G>A, p.Cys2150Tyr 3 1.07% 48 c.6658C>T, p.Gln2220* 3 1.07% 48 c.6709_6710insG, p.Thr2237Serfs 1 0.36% Int &#bc; Intron. Login to comment