ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Gly314Asp

ClinVar:	c.940G>C , p.Gly314Arg ? , not provided c.941G>T , p.Gly314Val ? , not provided c.941G>A , p.Gly314Glu ? , not provided
CF databases:	c.941G>T , p.Gly314Val (CFTR1) D , This mutation was found in a CF patient homozygous for this mutation. He was diagnosed as CF at 32 years. c.940G>C , p.Gly314Arg (CFTR1) D , This mutation was detected by chemical mismatch and sequencing. The mutation is a G to C change at nucleotide 1072. This results in a glycine to arginine substitution at amino acid 314 (G314R). It is in exon 7 and it eliminates a DdeI restriction site. This mutation was found in a patient with an American Indian/Caucasian mother and Dutch/French father. This patient has a [delta]F508 mutation on the other chromosomes and is pancreatic insufficient. This mutation was not found in 25 normal chromosomes and 25 CF chromosomes. c.941G>A , p.Gly314Glu (CFTR1) ? , This mutation, in exon 7 of the CFTR gene, was found by direct sequencing and the second mutation is [delta]F508. The patient is 7 years old. Diagnosis of CF was established at the age of five after severe lung infection. Sweat gland tests were positive. She is receiveing pancreatic enzyme supplements and long-term antibiotic treatment.
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (85%), C: D (91%), D: D (95%), E: D (66%), F: D (95%), H: D (95%), I: D (95%), K: D (95%), L: D (95%), M: D (95%), N: D (91%), P: D (95%), Q: D (95%), R: D (71%), S: D (80%), T: D (91%), V: D (95%), W: D (95%), Y: D (95%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: N, C: N, D: N, E: N, F: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: N, Y: N,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] CFTR: mechanism of anion conduction. Physiol Rev. 1999 Jan;79(1 Suppl):S47-75. Dawson DC, Smith SS, Mansoura MK
CFTR: mechanism of anion conduction.
Physiol Rev. 1999 Jan;79(1 Suppl):S47-75., [PMID:9922376]

Abstract [show]
CFTR: Mechanism of Anion Conduction. Physiol. Rev. 79, Suppl.: S47-S75, 1999. - The purpose of this review is to collect together the results of recent investigations of anion conductance by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator along with some of the basic background that is a prerequisite for developing some physical picture of the conduction process. The review begins with an introduction to the concepts of permeability and conductance and the Nernst-Planck and rate theory models that are used to interpret these parameters. Some of the physical forces that impinge on anion conductance are considered in the context of permeability selectivity and anion binding to proteins. Probes of the conduction process are considered, particularly permeant anions that bind tightly within the pore and block anion flow. Finally, structure-function studies are reviewed in the context of some predictions for the origin of pore properties.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
598 Mixtures of the TM2 and TM6 peptides producedmoderately impaired in G314A CFTR, and unaffected in G314D CFTR. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulato... Biophys J. 1998 Mar;74(3):1320-32. Mansoura MK, Smith SS, Choi AD, Richards NW, Strong TV, Drumm ML, Collins FS, Dawson DC
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) anion binding as a probe of the pore.
Biophys J. 1998 Mar;74(3):1320-32., [PMID:9512029]

Abstract [show]
We compared the effects of mutations in transmembrane segments (TMs) TM1, TM5, and TM6 on the conduction and activation properties of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) to determine which functional property was most sensitive to mutations and, thereby, to develop a criterion for measuring the importance of a particular residue or TM for anion conduction or activation. Anion substitution studies provided strong evidence for the binding of permeant anions in the pore. Anion binding was highly sensitive to point mutations in TM5 and TM6. Permeability ratios, in contrast, were relatively unaffected by the same mutations, so that anion binding emerged as the conduction property most sensitive to structural changes in CFTR. The relative insensitivity of permeability ratios to CFTR mutations was in accord with the notion that anion-water interactions are important determinants of permeability selectivity. By the criterion of anion binding, TM5 and TM6 were judged to be likely to contribute to the structure of the anion-selective pore, whereas TM1 was judged to be less important. Mutations in TM5 and TM6 also dramatically reduced the sensitivity of CFTR to activation by 3-isobutyl 1-methyl xanthine (IBMX), as expected if these TMs are intimately involved in the physical process that opens and closes the channel.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
62 Expression levels Wild-type and 11 mutant CFTR constructs were used in this study: G91A, G91E, G91R, G314A, G314D, G314E, G314Q, K335R, K335A, K335D, and K335E. Login to comment
116 It was of particular interest that the introduction of a glutamine (G314Q) also produced increased conductance ratios for the highly permeant anions and I, whereas the aspartic-acid-substituted construct (G314D) was not different from wtCFTR. Login to comment
131 The behavior of G314D CFTR was virtually identical to that of wtCFTR. Login to comment
135 There was no readily discernible voltage dependence to the dose-dependent attenuation of wtCFTR conductance by SCN; and similar results were obtained for G314D and G314A. Login to comment
136 In the case of the G314E and G314Q mutants, however, the SCN effect appeared to be moderately voltage dependent (Fig. 2 TABLE 2 Summary of permeability and conductance ratios from anion substitution experiments n SCN NO3 Br HCOO I A. Login to comment
137 Permeability Ratios Wild type 4-9 3.42 Ϯ 0.28 1.42 Ϯ 0.04 1.22 Ϯ 0.02 0.39 Ϯ 0.01 0.44 Ϯ 0.03 G91A 3-6 3.24 Ϯ 0.26 1.53 Ϯ 0.04 1.27 Ϯ 0.02 0.37 Ϯ 0.04 0.40 Ϯ 0.04 G91E 3-7 3.50 Ϯ 0.54 1.59 Ϯ 0.04 1.27 Ϯ 0.01 0.35 Ϯ 0.01 0.51 Ϯ 0.04 G91R 3-4 5.26 ؎ 0.46* 1.60 Ϯ 0.03 1.40 ؎ 0.01* 0.32 Ϯ 0.04 0.64 ؎ 0.04* G314A 3-4 2.87 Ϯ 0.17 1.45 Ϯ 0.03 1.19 Ϯ 0.02 0.31 Ϯ 0.03 0.33 Ϯ 0.03 G314D 4 3.42 Ϯ 0.34 1.44 Ϯ 0.05 1.25 Ϯ 0.04 0.33 Ϯ 0.03 0.51 Ϯ 0.05 G314E 3-4 3.72 Ϯ 0.56 1.65 ؎ 0.09* 1.35 ؎ 0.03* 0.49 Ϯ 0.04 0.53 Ϯ 0.04 G314Q 3-4 3.89 Ϯ 0.37 1.62 Ϯ 0.11 1.27 Ϯ 0.04 0.36 Ϯ 0.03 0.62 Ϯ 0.05 K335R 3-5 3.44 Ϯ 0.29 1.35 Ϯ 0.04 1.22 Ϯ 0.03 0.40 Ϯ 0.05 0.41 Ϯ 0.07 K335A 5-6 5.34 ؎ 0.58* 1.48 Ϯ 0.06 1.28 Ϯ 0.04 0.37 Ϯ 0.03 0.60 Ϯ 0.06 K335D 4-6 3.02 Ϯ 0.19 1.50 Ϯ 0.03 1.10 ؎ 0.02* 0.54 ؎ 0.04* 0.65 ؎ 0.06* K335E 5-8 3.64 Ϯ 0.21 1.48 Ϯ 0.06 1.29 Ϯ 0.03 0.46 Ϯ 0.04 1.10 ؎ 0.04* B. Conductance Ratios Wild type 4-9 0.14 Ϯ 0.02 0.75 Ϯ 0.02 0.64 Ϯ 0.02 0.52 Ϯ 0.03 0.18 Ϯ 0.03 G91A 3-6 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 0.77 Ϯ 0.02 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.47 Ϯ 0.02 0.19 Ϯ 0.02 G91E 3-7 0.15 Ϯ 0.03 0.73 Ϯ 0.02 0.60 Ϯ 0.01 0.50 Ϯ 0.04 0.30 Ϯ 0.02 G91R 3-4 0.14 Ϯ 0.00 0.84 Ϯ 0.01 0.63 Ϯ 0.01 0.32 ؎ 0.01* 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 G314A 3-4 0.30 Ϯ 0.09 0.89 ؎ 0.01* 0.66 Ϯ 0.01 0.48 Ϯ 0.09 0.24 Ϯ 0.01 G314D 4 0.28 Ϯ 0.05 0.82 Ϯ 0.01 0.70 Ϯ 0.02 0.49 Ϯ 0.06 0.27 Ϯ 0.03 G314E 3-4 0.62 ؎ 0.07* 1.18 ؎ 0.04* 0.84 ؎ 0.05* 0.42 Ϯ 0.05 0.29 Ϯ 0.09 G314Q 3-4 0.63 ؎ 0.02* 1.01 ؎ 0.04* 0.82 ؎ 0.03* 0.50 Ϯ 0.02 0.42 ؎ 0.02* K335R 3-5 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 0.76 Ϯ 0.03 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.59 Ϯ 0.06 0.16 Ϯ 0.03 K335A 6 0.20 Ϯ 0.03 0.77 Ϯ 0.02 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.45 Ϯ 0.03 0.21 Ϯ 0.02 K335D 4-6 0.65 ؎ 0.04* 1.25 ؎ 0.02* 0.89 ؎ 0.02* 0.61 Ϯ 0.06 0.58 ؎ 0.06* K335E 5-8 0.50 ؎ 0.06* 1.19 ؎ 0.03* 0.89 ؎ 0.02* 0.53 Ϯ 0.03 0.48 ؎ 0.03* (A) The apparent permeability ratios (PS/PCl) for each substitute anion were calculated from the shift in reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz relation (noted in Materials and Methods). Login to comment
169 TABLE 4 Quantitative analyses of the macroscopic I-V shape changes Mutant ⌬ Net charge n RR g(ϩ30)/g(-30) RR/RRWT Wild type 5 1.220 Ϯ 0.06 1.00 G91A 0 4 1.293 Ϯ 0.06 1.06 G91E -1 5 1.512 ؎ 0.10* 1.24 G91R 1 4 8.041 ؎ 0.87* 6.59 G314A 0 4 1.201 Ϯ 0.09 0.98 G314D -1 4 1.362 Ϯ 0.08 1.12 G314E -1 7 1.405 Ϯ 0.08 1.15 G314Q 0 5 1.376 Ϯ 0.10 1.13 K335R 0 4 1.209 Ϯ 0.06 0.99 K335A -1 4 1.295 Ϯ 0.07 1.06 K335D -2 5 0.762 ؎ 0.02* 0.62 K335E -2 4 0.919 ؎ 0.02* 0.75 The slope conductance was measured at ϩ30 mV and -30 mV with respect to the reversal potential. Login to comment
171 TABLE 3 The permeability ratio (PSCN/PCl) is independent of the mole fraction of [SCN]0 for wtCFTR and the G314 variants [SCN]/{[SCN]ϩ[Cl]} n PSCN/PCl 0.02 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.50 0.90 Wild type 12 3.82 Ϯ 0.50 4.43 Ϯ 0.57 4.58 Ϯ 0.48 4.69 Ϯ 0.43 4.66 Ϯ 0.38 4.44 Ϯ 0.35 G314A 9 4.32 Ϯ 0.73 3.78 Ϯ 0.53 3.81 Ϯ 0.47 3.79 Ϯ 0.34 3.82 Ϯ 0.29 3.72 Ϯ 0.25 G314D 3 2.99 Ϯ 0.26 2.56 Ϯ 1.05 2.82 Ϯ 1.07 2.68 Ϯ 0.97 2.87 Ϯ 0.65 2.89 Ϯ 0.43 G314E 6 4.48 Ϯ 1.05 4.01 Ϯ 0.69 4.17 Ϯ 0.62 4.15 Ϯ 0.59 3.96 Ϯ 0.41 3.82 Ϯ 0.40 G314Q 3 5.39 Ϯ 0.57 4.49 Ϯ 0.58 4.69 Ϯ 1.26 4.05 Ϯ 1.26 3.86 Ϯ 1.47 3.68 Ϯ 1.51 The permeability ratios were calculated from the shift in reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation. Login to comment
173 TABLE 5 Concentration-dependent activation of wtCFTR, G91, G314, and K335 variants by IBMX in the presence of 10 ␮M forskolin Mutant n K1/2(IBMX) (mM) Wild type 15 0.35 Ϯ 0.04 G91A 5 0.42 Ϯ 0.06 G91E 8 0.51 ؎ 0.06* G91R 5 0.49 Ϯ 0.09 G314A 10 1.21 ؎ 0.11* G314D 3 1.35 ؎ 0.16* G314E 8 6.39 ؎ 1.35* G314Q 4 14.26 ؎ 6.64* K335R 4 0.46 Ϯ 0.04 K335A 2 0.35 Ϯ 0.15 K335D 7 0.87 ؎ 0.13* K335E 3 0.95 ؎ 0.07* The steady-state slope conductance was measured at -60 mV as increasing concentrations of IBMX (0.02-5.0 mM) were added to the perfusate in the continued presence of 10 mM forskolin. Login to comment
180 It is noteworthy that, although the activation of G314D CFTR was significantly compromised, SCN binding was virtually identical to that seen with wtCFTR. Login to comment
194 Finally, in at least one mutant, G314D, the effect of [SCN]o on conductance was unaffected despite the fact that sensitivity to activation by IBMX was severely compromised. Login to comment
198 The results presented here are consistent with the notion that the binding of anions within the CFTR pore is a sensitive indicator of changes in pore structure whereas permeability ratios appear to be rather insensitive to similar TABLE 6 Qualitative summary of the functional consequences of mutations at G91, G314, and K335 Property G91 (TM1) K335 (TM6) G314 (TM5) G91A G91E G91R K335R K335A K335D K335E G314A G314D G314E G314Q I-V shape - - ϩϩϩ - - ϩϩ ϩ - - - - Psub/PCl - - - - - - ϩϩ - - - - gsub/gCl - - - - - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩ - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ SCN- binding - - - - - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩ - ϩϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ Activation - - - - - ϩϩ ϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ Results are expressed as follows: -, function of the CFTR construct with the indicated substitution was indistinguishable from wild type; ϩ to ϩϩϩϩ, semiquantitative indication of the magnitude of the change in the function compared with wild type. Login to comment
236 Simply introducing a negative charge at G314 (G314D) was not sufficient to reduce SCN binding, suggesting that the destabilizing effect was not electrostatic in nature, but rather that the role of TM5 may be to provide some element of conformation necessary for the tight binding of anions to another residue, such as R347 in TM6 (Tabcharani et al., 1993). Login to comment
273 In G314D CFTR, however, apparent SCN binding was similar to that seen with wtCFTR, but activation was significantly impaired, suggesting that 1) sensitivity to activation by IBMX is, if anything, even more sensitive than anion binding to alterations in the structure of TM5 and 2) there is no obligatory relation between anion binding and activation. Login to comment
117 It was of particular interest that the introduction of a glutamine (G314Q) also produced increased conductance ratios for the highly permeant anions and I, whereas the aspartic-acid-substituted construct (G314D) was not different from wtCFTR. Login to comment
132 The behavior of G314D CFTR was virtually identical to that of wtCFTR. Login to comment
138 Permeability Ratios Wild type 4-9 3.42 afe; 0.28 1.42 afe; 0.04 1.22 afe; 0.02 0.39 afe; 0.01 0.44 afe; 0.03 G91A 3-6 3.24 afe; 0.26 1.53 afe; 0.04 1.27 afe; 0.02 0.37 afe; 0.04 0.40 afe; 0.04 G91E 3-7 3.50 afe; 0.54 1.59 afe; 0.04 1.27 afe; 0.01 0.35 afe; 0.01 0.51 afe; 0.04 G91R 3-4 5.26 d1e; 0.46* 1.60 afe; 0.03 1.40 d1e; 0.01* 0.32 afe; 0.04 0.64 d1e; 0.04* G314A 3-4 2.87 afe; 0.17 1.45 afe; 0.03 1.19 afe; 0.02 0.31 afe; 0.03 0.33 afe; 0.03 G314D 4 3.42 afe; 0.34 1.44 afe; 0.05 1.25 afe; 0.04 0.33 afe; 0.03 0.51 afe; 0.05 G314E 3-4 3.72 afe; 0.56 1.65 d1e; 0.09* 1.35 d1e; 0.03* 0.49 afe; 0.04 0.53 afe; 0.04 G314Q 3-4 3.89 afe; 0.37 1.62 afe; 0.11 1.27 afe; 0.04 0.36 afe; 0.03 0.62 afe; 0.05 K335R 3-5 3.44 afe; 0.29 1.35 afe; 0.04 1.22 afe; 0.03 0.40 afe; 0.05 0.41 afe; 0.07 K335A 5-6 5.34 d1e; 0.58* 1.48 afe; 0.06 1.28 afe; 0.04 0.37 afe; 0.03 0.60 afe; 0.06 K335D 4-6 3.02 afe; 0.19 1.50 afe; 0.03 1.10 d1e; 0.02* 0.54 d1e; 0.04* 0.65 d1e; 0.06* K335E 5-8 3.64 afe; 0.21 1.48 afe; 0.06 1.29 afe; 0.03 0.46 afe; 0.04 1.10 d1e; 0.04* B. Conductance Ratios Wild type 4-9 0.14 afe; 0.02 0.75 afe; 0.02 0.64 afe; 0.02 0.52 afe; 0.03 0.18 afe; 0.03 G91A 3-6 0.14 afe; 0.01 0.77 afe; 0.02 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.47 afe; 0.02 0.19 afe; 0.02 G91E 3-7 0.15 afe; 0.03 0.73 afe; 0.02 0.60 afe; 0.01 0.50 afe; 0.04 0.30 afe; 0.02 G91R 3-4 0.14 afe; 0.00 0.84 afe; 0.01 0.63 afe; 0.01 0.32 d1e; 0.01* 0.14 afe; 0.01 G314A 3-4 0.30 afe; 0.09 0.89 d1e; 0.01* 0.66 afe; 0.01 0.48 afe; 0.09 0.24 afe; 0.01 G314D 4 0.28 afe; 0.05 0.82 afe; 0.01 0.70 afe; 0.02 0.49 afe; 0.06 0.27 afe; 0.03 G314E 3-4 0.62 d1e; 0.07* 1.18 d1e; 0.04* 0.84 d1e; 0.05* 0.42 afe; 0.05 0.29 afe; 0.09 G314Q 3-4 0.63 d1e; 0.02* 1.01 d1e; 0.04* 0.82 d1e; 0.03* 0.50 afe; 0.02 0.42 d1e; 0.02* K335R 3-5 0.14 afe; 0.01 0.76 afe; 0.03 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.59 afe; 0.06 0.16 afe; 0.03 K335A 6 0.20 afe; 0.03 0.77 afe; 0.02 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.45 afe; 0.03 0.21 afe; 0.02 K335D 4-6 0.65 d1e; 0.04* 1.25 d1e; 0.02* 0.89 d1e; 0.02* 0.61 afe; 0.06 0.58 d1e; 0.06* K335E 5-8 0.50 d1e; 0.06* 1.19 d1e; 0.03* 0.89 d1e; 0.02* 0.53 afe; 0.03 0.48 d1e; 0.03* (A) The apparent permeability ratios (PS/PCl) for each substitute anion were calculated from the shift in reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz relation (noted in Materials and Methods). Login to comment