ABCC7 p.Leu320Val
ClinVar: |
c.959T>A
,
p.Leu320*
?
, not provided
c.960A>T , p.Leu320Phe ? , not provided c.958T>G , p.Leu320Val D , Likely pathogenic |
CF databases: |
c.958T>G
,
p.Leu320Val
(CFTR1)
D
, The above mutation was detected by DGGE using chemical clamps and identified by direct sequencing. It is not found in 100 other non-[delta]F508 CF chromosomes and 100 non-CF chromosomes tested. The patient is presented with congenital absence of vas deferens and has [delta]F508 on the other chromosome.
c.960A>T , p.Leu320Phe (CFTR1) ? , The L320F mutation was detected in aCzech 8 year old male CF patient. His other CF allele has not been identified thus far. This mutation was not detected by ASO hybridization on 144 non-CF chromosomes of Czech parents. The diagnosis of CF was raised in the first year of life due to malabsorption with repeated bronchopneumonias, and finally substantiated by sweat chloride concentrations of 36, 38 and 55 mM. The patient also suffers from generalized eczema with pronounced blood eosinophilia. |
Predicted by SNAP2: | A: N (82%), C: N (87%), D: D (75%), E: D (53%), F: N (53%), G: D (53%), H: N (72%), I: N (87%), K: D (59%), M: N (82%), N: N (53%), P: D (63%), Q: N (61%), R: D (59%), S: N (72%), T: N (66%), V: N (93%), W: D (66%), Y: N (61%), |
Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: N, C: N, D: D, E: D, F: N, G: D, H: D, I: N, K: N, M: N, N: D, P: D, Q: N, R: D, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: D, Y: N, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Identification of CFTR, PRSS1, and SPINK1 mutation... Pancreas. 2006 Oct;33(3):221-7. Keiles S, Kammesheidt A
Identification of CFTR, PRSS1, and SPINK1 mutations in 381 patients with pancreatitis.
Pancreas. 2006 Oct;33(3):221-7., [PMID:17003641]
Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVES: Chronic pancreatitis is a progressive inflammatory disorder leading to irreversible exocrine and/or endocrine impairment. It is well documented that mutations in the cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) gene can cause hereditary pancreatitis. Mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and the serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) genes are also associated with pancreatitis. METHODS: We analyzed 381 patients with a primary diagnosis of chronic or recurrent pancreatitis using the Ambry Test: Pancreatitis to obtain comprehensive genetic information for the CFTR, SPINK1, and PRSS1 genes. RESULTS: The results identified 32% (122/381) of patients with 166 mutant CFTR alleles, including 12 novel CFTR variants: 4375-20 A>G, F575Y, K598E, L1260P, G194R, F834L, S573C, 2789 + 17 C>T, 621+83 A>G, T164S, 621+25 A>G, and 3500-19 G>A. Of 122 patients with CFTR mutations, 5.5% (21/381) also carried a SPINK1 mutation, and 1.8% (7/381) carried a PRSS1 mutation. In addition, 8.9% (34/381) of all patients had 1 of 11 different SPINK1 mutations. Another 6.3% (24/381) of the patients had 1 of 8 different PRSS1 mutations. Moreover, 1.3% of the patients (5/381) had 1 PRSS1 and 1 SPINK1 mutation. A total 49% (185/381) of the patients carried one or more mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive testing of the CFTR, PRSS1, and SPINK1 genes identified genetic variants in nearly half of all subjects considered by their physicians as candidates for genetic testing. Comprehensive test identified numerous novel variants that would not be identified by standard clinical screening panels.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
54 Patients With More Than 1 CFTR Mutation CFTR Mutation 1 CFTR Mutation 2 CFTR Mutation 3 No. of Patients deltaF508 5T 3 deltaF508 D1152H 1 deltaF508 deltaF508 1 deltaF508 F575Y 1 deltaF508 K598E 1 deltaF508 T164S 1 deltaF508 R74W D1270N 1 deltaF508 Q1476X 1 deltaF508 L997F 1 R553X D1152H 1 R553X G1069R 1 2789+5 G9A 2183 AA9G 1 3849+10kb C9T L1260P 1 711+3 A to G I1139V 1 1341+1 G9A G194R 5T 1 621+25 A9G 3500-19 C9T 1 R74W V855I 1 G542X R117H 1 G551D F311L 1 G576A R668C 2 K710X L997F 1 L997F L320V 1 G1069R 5T 1 1818+18 G9A 5T 1 F1074L 5T 1 F834L 5T 1 R74Q R297Q 1 R74Q R297Q 5T 1 R785Q 5T 1 R117H 5T 3 deltaF508 I1027T 1 Total patients 36 MutationsinboldfacewouldnothavebeendetectedbytheAmericanCollegeofObstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG)/American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) mutation panel.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 17003641:54:495
status: NEW[hide] Do common in silico tools predict the clinical con... Clin Genet. 2010 May;77(5):464-73. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Dorfman R, Nalpathamkalam T, Taylor C, Gonska T, Keenan K, Yuan XW, Corey M, Tsui LC, Zielenski J, Durie P
Do common in silico tools predict the clinical consequences of amino-acid substitutions in the CFTR gene?
Clin Genet. 2010 May;77(5):464-73. Epub 2009 Jan 6., [PMID:20059485]
Abstract [show]
Computational methods are used to predict the molecular consequences of amino-acid substitutions on the basis of evolutionary conservation or protein structure, but their utility in clinical diagnosis or prediction of disease outcome has not been well validated. We evaluated three popular computer programs, namely, PANTHER, SIFT and PolyPhen, by comparing the predicted clinical outcomes for a group of known CFTR missense mutations against the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) and clinical manifestations in cohorts of subjects with CF-disease and CFTR-related disorders carrying these mutations. Owing to poor specificity, none of tools reliably distinguished between individual mutations that confer CF disease from mutations found in subjects with a CFTR-related disorder or no disease. Prediction scores for CFTR mutations derived from PANTHER showed a significant overall statistical correlation with the spectrum of disease severity associated with mutations in the CFTR gene. In contrast, PolyPhen- and SIFT-derived scores only showed significant differences between CF-causing and non-CF variants. Current computational methods are not recommended for establishing or excluding a CF diagnosis, notably as a newborn screening strategy or in patients with equivocal test results.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
64 Mutations in the CFTR gene grouped by clinical category Cystic fibrosis CFTR-related disease No disease T338I D614G L320V V920L L90S M470V H199R S1251N I203M G550R P111A I148T Q1291H R560K L1388Q L183I R170H I1027T S549R D443Y P499A L1414S T908N R668C S549N A455E E1401K Q151K G27E I1234L Y563N R347P C866R S1118C P1290S R75Q A559T V520F P841R M469V E1401G P67L G85E S50Y E1409K R933G G458V G178R Y1032C R248T I980K G85V V392G L973P L137H T351S R334W I444S V938G R792G R560T R555G L1339F D1305E P574H V1240G T1053I D58G G551D L1335P I918M F994C S945L L558S F1337V R810G D1152H G1247R P574S R766M D579G W1098R H949R F200I R352Q L1077P K1351E M244K L206W M1101K D1154G L375F N1303K R1066C E528D D110Y R347H R1070Q A800G P1021S S549K A1364V V392A damaging` (is supposed to affect protein function or structure) and 'probably damaging` (high confidence of affecting protein function or structure).
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 20059485:64:116
status: NEW[hide] Genetic testing in pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(7):2202-6, 2206.e1. Epub 2010 Apr 20. Ooi CY, Gonska T, Durie PR, Freedman SD
Genetic testing in pancreatitis.
Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(7):2202-6, 2206.e1. Epub 2010 Apr 20., [PMID:20416310]
Abstract [show]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
53 Interpretation of Mutations Requires an Understanding of Their Functional Consequences Mutation group Reported mutations Complex allele: These mutations are recognized to occur on a single allele R117H ϩ T G576A ϩ R668C F508del ϩ I1027T Benign sequence alterations: These mutations have no known clinical consequence R74Q R297Q R74W 621 * 25 AϾG 3500-19 CϾT T164S C855I I1139V CFTR-related disorder associated: These mutations have been described in individuals with CF-like single organ disease (such as pancreatitis, sinopulmonary disease, or obstructive azoospermia), but do not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for CF 5T R117H D1270N L320V Q1352H 1818-18 GϾA S1235R CF causing F508del Q1476X R553X K710X G542X G551D F311L 2789-5 GϾA 2183AAϾG 711ϩ3 AϾG 3849ϩ10kb CϾT 1341ϩ1GϾA D1152Ha F1074La R553X Unknown clinical consequence F575Y L1260P G194R G1069R L997F K598E F834L R785Q To illustrate this point, mutations identified by extensive mutation testing in a cohort of patients with recurrent acute or chronic pancre- atitis14 are listed according to their clinical consequences (based on current consensus guidelines13 and functional and/or clinical reports; available: http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca).
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 20416310:53:667
status: NEW[hide] A new complex allele of the CFTR gene partially ex... Genet Med. 2010 Sep;12(9):548-55. Lucarelli M, Narzi L, Pierandrei S, Bruno SM, Stamato A, d'Avanzo M, Strom R, Quattrucci S
A new complex allele of the CFTR gene partially explains the variable phenotype of the L997F mutation.
Genet Med. 2010 Sep;12(9):548-55., [PMID:20706124]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of complex alleles, with two or more mutations in cis position, of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in the definition of the genotype-phenotype relationship in cystic fibrosis (CF), and to evaluate the functional significance of the highly controversial L997F CFTR mutation. METHODS: We evaluated the diagnosis of CF or CFTR-related disorders in 12 unrelated subjects with highly variable phenotypes. According to a first CFTR mutational analysis, subjects appeared to be compound heterozygotes for a classic mutation and the L997F mutation. A further CFTR mutational analysis was conducted by means of a protocol of extended sequencing, particularly suited to the detection of complex alleles. RESULTS: We detected a new [R117L; L997F] CFTR complex allele in the four subjects with the highest sweat test values and CF. The eight subjects without the complex allele showed the most varied biochemical and clinical outcome and were diagnosed as having mild CF, CFTR-related disorders, or even no disease. CONCLUSIONS: The new complex allele partially explains the variable phenotype in CF subjects with the L997F mutation. CFTR complex alleles are likely to have a role in the definition of the genotype-phenotype relationship in CF. Whenever apparently identical CFTR-mutated genotypes are found in subjects with divergent phenotypes, an extensive mutational search is mandatory.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
58 G85E (c.254GϾA), S549R(AϾC) (c.1645AϾC), and L320V (c.958TϾ G) are missense mutations located in the first membrane spanning domain-first transmembrane segment, in the first nucleotide-binding domain, and in the first membrane spanning domain- fifth transmembrane segment, respectively.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 20706124:58:63
status: NEW60 The L320V mutation has previously been found in two subjects with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, with no other symptoms37; to our knowledge, no other phenotypical description of this mutation has been published.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 20706124:60:4
status: NEW97 The five subjects with the F508del/L997F genotype, which were expected to be more severe than the L320V/L997F genotype, represent a paradigm for variability.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 20706124:97:98
status: NEW151 The initial genetic characterization of the subject with the L320V/L997F genotype was performed by the Regional Reference Center for Rare Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Padova (Italy).
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 20706124:151:61
status: NEW[hide] Validation of high-resolution DNA melting analysis... J Mol Diagn. 2008 Sep;10(5):424-34. Epub 2008 Aug 7. Audrezet MP, Dabricot A, Le Marechal C, Ferec C
Validation of high-resolution DNA melting analysis for mutation scanning of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene.
J Mol Diagn. 2008 Sep;10(5):424-34. Epub 2008 Aug 7., [PMID:18687795]
Abstract [show]
High-resolution melting analysis of polymerase chain reaction products for mutation scanning, which began in the early 2000s, is based on monitoring of the fluorescence released during the melting of double-stranded DNA labeled with specifically developed saturation dye, such as LC-Green. We report here the validation of this method to scan 98% of the coding sequence of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. We designed 32 pairs of primers to amplify and analyze the 27 exons of the gene. Thanks to the addition of a small GC-clamp at the 5' ends of the primers, one single melting domain and one identical annealing temperature were obtained to co-amplify all of the fragments. A total of 307 DNA samples, extracted by the salt precipitation method, carrying 221 mutations and 21 polymorphisms, plus 20 control samples free from variations (confirmed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography analysis), was used. With the conditions described in this study, 100% of samples that carry heterozygous mutations and 60% of those with homozygous mutations were identified. The study of a cohort of 136 idiopathic chronic pancreatitis patients enabled us to prospectively evaluate this technique. Thus, high-resolution melting analysis is a robust and sensitive single-tube technique for screening mutations in a gene and promises to become the gold standard over denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, particularly for highly mutated genes such as CFTR, and appears suitable for use in reference diagnostic laboratories.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
171 Results of CFTR Analysis by HRM on 136 Samples of Patients with Idiopathic Chronic Pancreatitis (ICP) Exon Number of positive samples Mutations identified Variants identified New positive controls 1 14 14 125GϾC 2 1 1 R31C 3 9 1 G85E 7 R75Q 1 R74W 4 4 1 R117G 1 I148T R117G 1 R117H 1 A120T 5 1 1 L188P L188P 6a 5 1 V201M 1 A221A A221A 3 875ϩ40 AϾG 6b 27 1 M284T 26 1001ϩ11CϾT M284T 7 1 1 L320V L320V 8 0 0 9 1 1 D443Y 10 16 8 F508del 8 E528E 11 1 1 G542X 12 6 4 G576A 1 Y577Y L568F 1 L568F 13 7 1 S737F 4 R668C S737F 1 V754M L644L 1 L644L 14a 53 52 T854T T854TϩI853I 1 T854TϩI853I 14b 0 0 15 3 1 L967S T908S 1 T908S 1 S945L 16 0 0 17a 10 7 L997F 1 3271ϩ18CϾT 3271 ϩ 3AϾG 1 3271 ϩ 3 AϾG 1 Y1014C 17b 3 1 L1096L L1096L 1 H1054DϩG1069R 1 3272-33AϾG H1054DϩG1069R 3272-33AϾG 18 2 1 D1152H E1124del 1 E1124del 19 5 5 S1235R poly 20 7 1 W1282X 5 P1290P 1 D1270N 21 2 1 N1303K 1 T1299T 22 0 0 23 1 0 4374ϩ13 AϾG 24 43 40 Q1463Q 2 Y1424Y 1 Q1463QϩY1024Y ing domain of a gene brings an excellent sensitivity for heterozygote detection that is very close to 100%.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 18687795:171:418
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 18687795:171:424
status: NEW[hide] Diagnostic testing by CFTR gene mutation analysis ... J Mol Diagn. 2005 May;7(2):289-99. Schrijver I, Ramalingam S, Sankaran R, Swanson S, Dunlop CL, Keiles S, Moss RB, Oehlert J, Gardner P, Wassman ER, Kammesheidt A
Diagnostic testing by CFTR gene mutation analysis in a large group of Hispanics: novel mutations and assessment of a population-specific mutation spectrum.
J Mol Diagn. 2005 May;7(2):289-99., [PMID:15858154]
Abstract [show]
Characterization of CFTR mutations in the U.S. Hispanic population is vital to early diagnosis, genetic counseling, patient-specific treatment, and the understanding of cystic fibrosis (CF) pathogenesis. The mutation spectrum in Hispanics, however, remains poorly defined. A group of 257 self-identified Hispanics with clinical manifestations consistent with CF were studied by temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis and/or DNA sequencing. A total of 183 mutations were identified, including 14 different amino acid-changing novel variants. A significant proportion (78/85) of the different mutations identified would not have been detected by the ACMG/ACOG-recommended 25-mutation screening panel. Over one third of the mutations (27/85) occurred with a relative frequency >1%, which illustrates that the identified mutations are not all rare. This is supported by a comparison with other large CFTR studies. These results underscore the disparity in mutation identification between Caucasians and Hispanics and show utility for comprehensive diagnostic CFTR mutation analysis in this population.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
98 Spectrum of CFTR Sequence Variants in 257 Hispanic Patients Who Underwent Diagnostic DNA Testing for CF Mutations in 257 patients Allele counts of each mutation % of variant alleles (183) % of all alleles tested (514) ACMG/ACOG recommended 25 mutation panel* DeltaF508 53 28.96 10.31 G542X 7 3.83 1.36 R334W 2 1.09 0.39 R553X 2 1.09 0.39 DeltaI507 1 0.55 0.19 1717 - 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 3120 ϩ 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 7 different mutations 67 36.61 13.04 All mutations included ACMG/ACOG 1248 ϩ 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 1249 - 29delAT 1 0.55 0.19 1288insTA1288insTA 1 0.55 0.19 1341 ϩ 80 GϾA1341 ϩ 80 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 1429del71429del7 1 0.55 0.19 1525 - 42 GϾA1525 - 42 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 1717 - 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 1717 - 8 GϾA 2 1.09 0.39 1811 ϩ 1 GϾA1811 ϩ 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 2055del9-ϾA 3 1.64 0.58 2105-2117del13insAGAAA 1 0.55 0.19 2215insG 1 0.55 0.19 2585delT2585delT 1 0.55 0.19 2752 - 6 TϾC 1 0.55 0.19 296 ϩ 28 AϾG 1 0.55 0.19 3120 ϩ 1 GϾ A 1 0.55 0.19 3271 ϩ 8 AϾG3271 ϩ 8 AϾG 1 0.55 0.19 3271delGG 1 0.55 0.19 3272 - 26 AϾG 2 1.09 0.39 3876delA 2 1.09 0.39 4016insT 1 0.55 0.19 406 - 1 GϾA 6 3.28 1.17 406 - 6 TϾC 1 0.55 0.19 4374 ϩ 13 A ϾG 1 0.55 0.19 663delT 1 0.55 0.19 874insTACA874insTACA 1 0.55 0.19 A1009T 2 1.09 0.39 A559T 1 0.55 0.19 D1152H 1 0.55 0.19 D1270N 3 1.64 0.58 D1445N 2 1.09 0.39 D836Y 1 0.55 0.19 DeltaF311 1 0.55 0.19 DeltaF508 53 28.96 10.31 DeltaI507 1 0.55 0.19 E116K 2 1.09 0.39 E585X 1 0.55 0.19 E588VE588V 2 1.09 0.39 E831X 1 0.55 0.19 F311L 1 0.55 0.19 F693L 1 0.55 0.19 G1244E 1 0.55 0.19 G542X 7 3.83 1.36 G576A 1 0.55 0.19 H199Y 3 1.64 0.58 I1027T 3 1.64 0.58 I285FI285F 1 0.55 0.19 L206W 3 1.64 0.58 L320V 1 0.55 0.19 L967S 1 0.55 0.19 L997F 3 1.64 0.58 P1372LP1372L 1 0.55 0.19 P205S 1 0.55 0.19 P439SP439S 1 0.55 0.19 Q1313X 1 0.55 0.19 Q890X 2 1.09 0.39 Q98R 1 0.55 0.19 R1066C 1 0.55 0.19 R1066H 1 0.55 0.19 (Table continues) missense variant, I1027T (3212TϾC), in exon 17a.25 Family studies have not been performed to identify which allele carries two mutations.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 15858154:98:1816
status: NEW187 CFTR Sequence Variants Identified in Five Comprehensive CFTR Studies in US Hispanics CFTR mutations Alleles Relative mutation frequency (%) (of 317) deltaF508 123 38.80 3876delA 15 4.70 G542X 12 3.80 406 - 1GϾA 8 2.50 3849 ϩ 10kbCϾT 5 1.60 R75X 4 1.30 935delA 4 1.30 S549N 4 1.30 W1204X 4 1.30 R334W 4 1.30 2055del9ϾA 3 1 R74W 3 1 H199Y 3 1 L206W 3 1 663delT 3 1 3120 ϩ 1GϾA 3 1 L997F 3 1 I1027T 3 1 R1066C 3 1 W1089X 3 1 D1270N 3 1 2105del13insAGAAA 3 1 Q98R 2 Ͻ1 E116K 2 Ͻ1 I148T 2 Ͻ1 R668C 2 Ͻ1 P205S 2 Ͻ1 V232D 2 Ͻ1 S492F 2 Ͻ1 T501A 2 Ͻ1 1949del84 2 Ͻ1 Q890X 2 Ͻ1 3271delGG 2 Ͻ1 3272 - 26AϾG 2 Ͻ1 G1244E 2 Ͻ1 D1445N 2 Ͻ1 R553X 2 Ͻ1 E588V 2 Ͻ1 1717 - 8GϾA 2 Ͻ1 A1009T 2 Ͻ1 S1235R 2 Ͻ1 G85E 1 Ͻ1 296 ϩ 28AϾG 1 Ͻ1 406 - 6TϾC 1 Ͻ1 V11I 1 Ͻ1 Q179K 1 Ͻ1 V201 mol/L 1 Ͻ1 874insTACA 1 Ͻ1 I285F 1 Ͻ1 deltaF311 1 Ͻ1 F311L 1 Ͻ1 L320V 1 Ͻ1 T351S 1 Ͻ1 R352W 1 Ͻ1 1248 ϩ 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1249 - 29delAT 1 Ͻ1 1288insTA 1 Ͻ1 1341 ϩ 80GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1429del7 1 Ͻ1 1525 - 42GϾA 1 Ͻ1 P439S 1 Ͻ1 1717 - 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1811 ϩ 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 deltaI507 1 Ͻ1 G551D 1 Ͻ1 A559T 1 Ͻ1 Y563N 1 Ͻ1 (Table continues) In this study, we used temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE) and direct DNA sequencing to increase the sensitivity of mutation detection in U.S. Hispanics, and to determine whether additional mutations are recurrent.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 15858154:187:1061
status: NEW[hide] A Genotypic-Oriented View of CFTR Genetics Highlig... Mol Med. 2015 Apr 21;21:257-75. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2014.00229. Lucarelli M, Bruno SM, Pierandrei S, Ferraguti G, Stamato A, Narzi F, Amato A, Cimino G, Bertasi S, Quattrucci S, Strom R
A Genotypic-Oriented View of CFTR Genetics Highlights Specific Mutational Patterns Underlying Clinical Macrocategories of Cystic Fibrosis.
Mol Med. 2015 Apr 21;21:257-75. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2014.00229., [PMID:25910067]
Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenic disease caused by mutations of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The genotype-phenotype relationship in this disease is still unclear, and diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic challenges persist. We enrolled 610 patients with different forms of CF and studied them from a clinical, biochemical, microbiological and genetic point of view. Overall, there were 125 different mutated alleles (11 with novel mutations and 10 with complex mutations) and 225 genotypes. A strong correlation between mutational patterns at the genotypic level and phenotypic macrocategories emerged. This specificity appears to largely depend on rare and individual mutations, as well as on the varying prevalence of common alleles in different clinical macrocategories. However, 19 genotypes appeared to underlie different clinical forms of the disease. The dissection of the pathway from the CFTR mutated genotype to the clinical phenotype allowed to identify at least two components of the variability usually found in the genotype-phenotype relationship. One component seems to depend on the genetic variation of CFTR, the other component on the cumulative effect of variations in other genes and cellular pathways independent from CFTR. The experimental dissection of the overall biological CFTR pathway appears to be a powerful approach for a better comprehension of the genotype-phenotype relationship. However, a change from an allele-oriented to a genotypic-oriented view of CFTR genetics is mandatory, as well as a better assessment of sources of variability within the CFTR pathway.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
300 These patients had the following mutations on the other allele: F508del (p.Phe508del) (1 CF-PS, 4 CFTR-RD and 1 CBAVD, including 2 siblings), G85E (p.Gly85Glu) (1 CF-PS), W1282X (p.Trp1282*) (2 CFTR-RD siblings), L320V (p.Leu320Val) (1 CFTR-RD), S549R(A>C) (p.Ser549Arg) (1 CFTR-RD), 711+5G>A (c.579+5G>A) (1 CBAVD) and unknown (1 CBAVD).
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 25910067:300:213
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 25910067:300:222
status: NEW370 991del5 c.859_863delAACTT CF-PI nd p.Asn287LysfsX19 L320V c.958T>G uncertain: CF-PI and/or CF-PS and/or CFTR-RD nd p.Leu320Val R334W c.1000C>T CF-PI,CF-PS CF-causing p.Arg334Trp R334L c.1001G>T CF-PS nd p.Arg334Leu T338I c.1013C>T CF-PS,CFTR-RD,CBAVD CF-causing p.Thr338Ile R347P c.1040G>C CF-PI,CF-PS CF-causing p.Arg347Pro R347H c.1040G>A CF-PS CF-causing p.Arg347His [M348K;S912X] c.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 25910067:370:52
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Leu320Val 25910067:370:117
status: NEW