ABCC7 p.Trp496*
| ClinVar: |
c.1487G>A
,
p.Trp496*
?
, not provided
|
| CF databases: |
c.1487G>A
,
p.Trp496*
D
, CF-causing
c.1486T>C , p.Trp496Arg (CFTR1) ? , |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR muta... Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM
Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606., [PMID:12007216]
Abstract [show]
Although there have been numerous reports from around the world of mutations in the gene of chromosome 7 known as CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), little attention has been given to integrating these mutant alleles into a global understanding of the population molecular genetics associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). We determined the distribution of CFTR mutations in as many regions throughout the world as possible in an effort designed to: 1) increase our understanding of ancestry-genotype relationships, 2) compare mutational arrays with disease incidence, and 3) gain insight for decisions regarding screening program enhancement through CFTR multi-mutational analyses. Information on all mutations that have been published since the identification and cloning of the CFTR gene's most common allele, DeltaF508 (or F508del), was reviewed and integrated into a centralized database. The data were then sorted and regional CFTR arrays were determined using mutations that appeared in a given region with a frequency of 0.5% or greater. Final analyses were based on 72,431 CF chromosomes, using data compiled from over 100 original papers, and over 80 regions from around the world, including all nations where CF has been studied using analytical molecular genetics. Initial results confirmed wide mutational heterogeneity throughout the world; however, characterization of the most common mutations across most populations was possible. We also examined CF incidence, DeltaF508 frequency, and regional mutational heterogeneity in a subset of populations. Data for these analyses were filtered for reliability and methodological strength before being incorporated into the final analysis. Statistical assessment of these variables revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between DeltaF508 frequency and the CF incidence levels of regional populations. Regional analyses were also performed to search for trends in the distribution of CFTR mutations across migrant and related populations; this led to clarification of ancestry-genotype patterns that can be used to design CFTR multi-mutation panels for CF screening programs. From comprehensive assessment of these data, we offer recommendations that multiple CFTR alleles should eventually be included to increase the sensitivity of newborn screening programs employing two-tier testing with trypsinogen and DNA analysis.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
110 Germany ∆F508 (71.8%) 1789+5G→A (0.9%) 87.6 76.7 17 5662/1316 Dörk et al. [1992]; Dörk et al. R553X (2.0%) 3272-26A→G (0.9%) [1994]; Tümmler et al. [1996]; N1303K (1.8%) W1282X (0.7%) Estivill et al. [1997]; Dörk et G542X (1.2%) 2143delT (0.7%) al. [2000] R347P (1.2%) 1078delT (0.6%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.2%) 2183AA→G (0.6%) 3849+10KbC→T (1.0%) 2184insA (0.6%) G551D (0.9% 3659delC (0.6%) 1717-1G→A (0.9%) Greece ∆F508 (52.9%) 3272-26A→G (0.8%) 82.2 67.6 22 2097/718 Kanavakis et al. [1995]; Estivill 621+1G→T (5.0%) R1070Q (0.8%) et al. [1997]; Tzetis et al. G542X (4.1%) W496X (0.7%) [1997]; Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (3.3%) 621+3A→G (0.7%) 2183AA→G (1.8%) ∆I507 (0.7%) 2789+5G→A (1.7%) W1282X (0.7%) E822X (1.6%) 574delA (0.7%) R117H (1.2%) 1677delTA (0.7%) R334W (1.1%) A46D (0.6%) R1158X (1.0%) 3120+1G→A (0.6%) G85E (1.0%) G551D (0.5%) Hungary ∆F508 (54.9%) W1282X (1.8%) 68.3 46.6 9 1133/976 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. 1717-1G→A (1.9%) G542X (1.7%) [1997]; Macek et al. [2002] R553X (2.1%) N1303K (1.3%) Y1092X (1.8%) G551D (1.0%) S1196X (1.8%) Ireland ∆F508 (70.4%) G542X (1.0%) 82.1 67.4 7 801/509 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. G551D (5.7%) 621+1G→T (0.8%) [1994] R117H (2.4%) 1717-1G→A (0.6%) R560T (1.2%) Italy ∆F508 (50.9%) ∆I507 (0.65%) 60.3 36.4 9 3524 Estivill et al. [1997] (total) G542X (3.1%) W1282X (0.62%) 1717-1G→A (1.6%) Y122K (0.59%) N1303K (1.4%) G551D (0.53%) R553X (0.94%) Italy ∆F508 (47.6%) R553X (1.3%) 87.1 75.9 15 225 Bonizzato et al. [1995] (Northeast) R1162X (9.8%) 2789+G→A (1.3%) 2183AA→G (9.3%) Q552X (1.3%) N1303K (4.0%) 621+1G→T (0.9%) G542X (2.7%) W1282X (0.9%) 711+5G→A (2.7%) 3132delTG (0.9%) 1717-1G→A (2.2%) 2790-2A→G (0.9%) G85E (1.3%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS583 Italy ∆F508 (56.4%) 711+1G→T (1.3%) 85.7 73.4 13 660/396 Castaldo et al. [1996]; Castaldo (southern) N1303K (6.8%) G1244E (1.3%) et al. [1999] G542X (5.7%) R1185X (1.3%) W1282X (3.8%) L1065P (1.3%) 1717-1G→A (2.3%) R553X (1.1%) 2183AA→G (1.9%) I148T (0.7%) 4016insT (1.8%) Latvia 1) DF508 (58.3%) 4) CFTRdele2,3 (2.8%) - - 6 36 Dörk et al. [2000]; Macek et al. 2) 3849+10KbC®T (8.3%) 5) W1282X (2.8%) [2002] 3) N1303K (5.6%) 6) 394delTT (2.8%) Lithuania ∆F508 (31.0%) N1303K (2.0%) 39.0 15.2 4 94 Dörk et al. [2000]; Macek et al. R553X (4.0%) CFTRdele2,3 (2.0%) [2002] Macedonia ∆F508 (54.3%) 711+3A→G (1.0%) 69.2 47.9 12 559/226 Petreska et al. [1998]; Dörk et G542X (4.2%) 3849G→A (1.0%) al. [2000]; Macek et al. N1303K (2.0%) 2184insA (0.9%) [2002] CFTRdele2,3 (1.3%) 457TAT→G (0.7%) 621+1G→T (1.3%) V139E (0.7%) 611-1G→T (1.2%) 1811+1G→C (0.6%) Netherlands ∆F508 (74.2%) R1162X (0.9%) 86.8 75.3 9 3167/1442 Gan et al. [1995]; Estiville et al. A455E (4.7%) S1251N (0.9%) [1997]; Collee et al. [1998] G542X (1.8%) N1303K (0.9%) 1717-1G→A (1.5%) W1282X (0.7%) R553X (1.2%) Norway ∆F508 (60.2%) G551D (1.2%) 69.8 48.7 6 410/242 Schwartz et al. [1994]; Estivill 394delTT (4.2%) G542X (0.6%) et al. [1997] R117H (3.0%) N1303K (0.6%) Poland ∆F508 (57.1%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.8%) 73.5 54.0 11 4046/1726 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. 3849+10Kb C→T (2.7%) R560T (1.5%) [1997]; Dörk et al [2000]; G542X (2.6%) W1282X (0.7%) Macek et al. [2002] 1717-1G→A (2.4%) ∆I507 (0.5%) R553X (1.9%) G551D (0.5%) N1303K (1.8%) Portugal ∆F508 (44.7%) R334W (0.7%) 49.7 24.7 5 739/454 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. G542X (1.6%) N1303K (0.7%) [1997] R1066C (2.0%) Romania ∆F508 (36.6%) G542X (1.4%) 51.5 26.5 11 224/74 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. 2043delG (2.0%) R553X (1.4%) [1997]; Popa et al. [1997]; W1282X (1.7%) G576X (1.4%) Macek et al. [2002] 1717-2A→G (1.4%) 1898+1G→A (1.4%) I148T (1.4%) 2183AA→G (1.4%) 621+1G→T (1.4%) Russia ∆F508 (54.4%) 552insA (0.9%) 70.7 50.0 12 5073/2562 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. CFTRdele2,3 (5.0%) G542X (0.9%) [1997]; Dörk et al. [2000]; R553X (3.5%) R334W (0.9%) Macek et al. [2002] 2183AA→G (1.3%) 1677delTA (0.8%) W1282X (1.0%) Y122X (0.5%) 394delTT (1.0%) 1367del5 (0.5%) (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL.
X
ABCC7 p.Trp496* 12007216:110:651
status: NEW112 Jewish 1) 405+1G®A (48.0%) 3) W1282X (17.0%) - - 4 23 Kerem et al. [1995] (Tunisia) 2) DF508 (31.0%) 4) 3849+10KbC®T (4.0%) Jewish 1) G85E 4) G542X - - 6 10 Kerem et al. [1995] (Turkey) 2) DF508 5) 3849+10KbC®T 3) W1282X 6) W1089X Jewish (Yemen) None - - 0 5 Kerem et al. [1995] Lebanon 1) DF508 (35.0%) 6) 4096-28G®A (2.5%) - - 9 40 Desgeorges et al. [1997] 2) W1282X (20.0%) 7) 2789+5G®A (2.5%) 3) 4010del4 (10.0%) 8) M952I (2.5%) 4) N1303K (10.0%) 9) E672del (2.5%) 5) S4X (5.0%) Reunion ∆F508 (52.0%) 1717-1G→A (0.7%) 90.4 81.7 9 138 Cartault et al. [1996] Island Y122X (24.0%) G542X (0.7%) 3120+1G→A (8.0%) A309G (0.7%) A455E (2.2%) 2789+5G→A (0.7%) G551D (1.4%) Saudi North: 3) H139L - - North 1 49 families El-Harith et al. [1997]; Arabia 1) 1548delG 4) L1177X Central 3 Kambouris et al. [1997]; Central: 5) DF508 South 4 Banjar et al. [1999] 1)I1234V 6) 3120+1G®A West 9 2)1548delG 7) 425del42 East 6 3)DF508 8) R553X South: 9) N1303K 1) I1234V East: 2) 1548delG 1) 3120+1G®A 3) 711+1G®T 2) H139L 4) 3120+1G®A 3) 1548delG West: 4) DF508 1) I1234V 5) S549R 2) G115X 6) N1303K Tunisia ∆F508 (17.6%) G85E (2.6%) 58.7 34.5 11 78 Messaoud et al. [1996] G542X (8.9%) W1282X (2.6%) 711+1G→T (7.7%) Y122X (1.3%) N1303K (6.4%) T665S (1.3%) 2766del8NT (6.4%) R47W+D1270N (1.3%) R1066C (2.6%) Turkeye ∆F508 (24.5%) 1066L (1.3%) 80.6 65.0 36 1067/670 Yilmaz et al. [1995]; Estivill et al. 1677delTA (4.1%) E822X (1.3%) [1997]; Onay et al. [1998]; 2789+5G→A (3.9%) 2183+5G→A+2184insA (1.3%) Macek et al. [2002] 2181delA (3.8%) D110H (0.8%) R347H (3.6%) P1013L (0.8%) N1303K (2.9%) 3172delAC (0.8%) 621+1G→T (2.6%) 1259insA (0.8%) G542X (2.6%) M1028I (0.8%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS587 E92K (2.6%) 4005+1G→A (0.7%) A96E (2.6%) W1282X (0.7%) M152V (2.6%) I148T (0.6%) 2183AA→G (2.5%) R1162X (0.6%) 296+9A→T (1.6%) D1152H (0.6%) 2043delG (1.4%) W1098X (0.6%) E92X (1.4%) E831X (0.6%) K68N (1.4%) W496X (0.6%) G85E (1.3%) F1052V (0.5%) R1158X (1.3%) L571S (0.5%) United Arab S549R (61.5%) ∆F508 (26.9%) 88.4 78.1 2 86/52 Frossard et al. [1988]; Emirates Frossard et al. [1999] North/Central/South Americas Argentina ∆F508 (58.6%) N1303K (1.8%) 69.1 47.7 5 326/228 CFGAC [1994]; Chertkoff et al. W1282X (3.9%) 1717-1G→A (0.9%) [1997] G542X (3.9%) Brazilf ∆F508 (47.7%) W1282X (1.3%) 66.8 44.6 10 820/500 CFGAC [1994]; Cabello et al. (total) G542X (7.2%) G85E (1.3%) [1999]; Raskin et al. [1999]; R1162X (2.5%) R553X (0.7%) Bernardino et al. [2000] R334W (2.5%) L206W (0.6%) N1303K (2.4%) 2347delG (0.6%) South East: >∆F508, G542X South: >N1303K Brazil ∆F508 (31.7%) N1303K (2.5%) 42.5 18.1 3 120 Parizotto and Bertuzzo [1997] (Sao Paulo) G542X (8.3%) Canada ∆F508 (59.0%) G542X (0.5%) 98.5 97.0 13 381/200 Rozen et al. [1992]; (Lac St. Jean) 621+1G→T (24.3%) N1303K (0.5%) De Braekeleer et al. [1998] A445E (8.2%) Q890X (0.5%) Y1092X (1.2%) S489X (0.5) 711+1G→T (1.0%) R117C (0.5%) I148T (1.0%) R1158 (0.5%) G85E (0.8%) Canada ∆F508 (71.4%) ∆I507 (1.3%) 90.9 82.6 7 77 Rozen et al. [1992] (Quebec City) 711+1G→T (9.1%) Y1092X (1.3%) 621+1G→T (5.2%) N1303K (1.3%) A455E (1.3%) Canada ∆F508 (70.9%) W1282X (0.9%) 82.0 67.2 10 632 Kristidis et al. [1992] (Toronto) G551D (3.1%) R117H (0.9%) G542X (2.2%) 1717-1G→A (0.6%) 621+1G→T (1.3%) R560T (0.6%) N1303K (0.9%) ∆I507 (0.6%) Chile ∆F508 (29.2%) R553X (4.2%) 33.4 11.2 2 72 Rios et al. [1994] Columbia 1) DF508 (35.4%) 3) N1303K (2.1%) - - 4 48 Restrepo et al. [2000] 2) G542X (6.3%) 4) W1282X (2.1%) Ecuador 1) DF508 (25%) - - 1 20 Paz-y-Mino et al. [1999] (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL.
X
ABCC7 p.Trp496* 12007216:112:2228
status: NEW[hide] Genotype/phenotype correlation of the G85E mutatio... Eur Respir J. 2004 May;23(5):679-84. Decaestecker K, Decaestecker E, Castellani C, Jaspers M, Cuppens H, De Boeck K
Genotype/phenotype correlation of the G85E mutation in a large cohort of cystic fibrosis patients.
Eur Respir J. 2004 May;23(5):679-84., [PMID:15176679]
Abstract [show]
In this European study, the phenotype in 68 patients, homozygous or compound heterozygous for the G85E mutation, was investigated. Each index case was compared with two cystic fibrosis (CF) patients from the same clinic, matched for age and sex: one with pancreatic sufficiency (PS) and one with pancreatic insufficiency (PI). When comparing 31 G85E/F508del and F508del/F508del patients, there were no differences in median age at diagnosis, mean sweat chloride value, most recent weight for height, most recent forced expiratory volume in one second % predicted, prevalence of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation and typical CF complications. However, PI was less frequent in the G85E/F508del group. Comparison of 55 G85E patients (with second mutation known and not classified as mild) with PS controls (n=44) showed that the G85E patients had a significantly higher sweat chloride, more often failure to thrive at diagnosis, higher prevalence of PI, worse current weight for height, higher prevalence of chronic P. aeruginosa colonisation and liver cirrhosis. Pulse-chase experiments revealed that G85E cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator failed to mature on a M470 as well as on a V470 background. Therefore, G85E is a class II mutation. Although there is variability in its clinical presentation, G85E mutation results in a severe phenotype.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
93 1 G85E/W496X 1 F508del# /N1303K# 1 G85E/N1303K# 1 T388I/R1158X 1 G85E/711z5GRA} 1 3272-26AwG} /E822X 1 G85E/R334W} 1 F508del# /R334W} 1 Total 68 574delA/2789z5GRA 1 F508del# /3272-26ARG} 1 F508del# /R352Q 1 F508del# /3272-26AwG} 1 R334W} /444delA 1 L206W/3272-26ARG} 1 F508del# /F508del# 1 L206W/?
X
ABCC7 p.Trp496* 15176679:93:7
status: NEW[hide] Cystic fibrosis mutation screening in CBAVD patien... Mol Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;4(4):333-7. Kanavakis E, Tzetis M, Antoniadi T, Pistofidis G, Milligos S, Kattamis C
Cystic fibrosis mutation screening in CBAVD patients and men with obstructive azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia.
Mol Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;4(4):333-7., [PMID:9620832]
Abstract [show]
Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) found in otherwise healthy infertile males, is associated with a high incidence of mutated cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) alleles, and is considered a genital form of cystic fibrosis (CF). The CF gene may also be involved in the aetiology of male infertility in cases other than CBAVD. The present study was undertaken to test the involvement of CFTR gene mutations in 14 CBAVD males and additionally in cases of male infertility caused by obstructive azoospermia (n = 10) and severe oligozoospermia (n = 3). The entire coding region of the CFTR gene was analysed using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). The three allele (5T, 7T, 9T) polymorphic tract of thymidines in intron 8 (IVS8-polyT) of which the 5T allele acts as a mild mutation, causing reduced levels of normal CFTR mRNA due to deletion of exon 9, was also analysed. Of the 14 CBAVD cases, four (28.6%) were found to have mutations in both copies of the CFTR gene, six (42.8%) had one CFTR mutation, and in the remaining four (28.6%) no CFTR mutations were found. Of the 10 cases with obstructive azoospermia, three (30%) had one CFTR mutation and in the remaining seven (70%) no mutations were found. None of the three severe oligozoospermia cases carried a CFTR mutation. The frequency of the IVS8(5T) allele was 14.3% (4/28) for the CBAVD cases and 5% (1/20) for the obstructive azoospermia cases, none of the severe oligozoospermia males carried the IVS8-5(5T) allele. The data indicate that while there is a strong association between male infertility caused by CBAVD and mutations in the CFTR gene, cases of obstructive azoospermia without CBAVD also seem to be associated with CFTR gene mutations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
64 Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), PolyT genotypes and clinical data of men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD, n ϭ 14), obstructive azoospermia (ObsA, n ϭ 10) and oligozoospermia (n ϭ 3) Patients Sweat chloride CFTR IVS8-polyT Other clinical (mEq/l) mutations alleles features Two mutations detected MS1 (CBAVD) 107.7 ∆F508/M1I 5T/9T Recurrent bronchitis MS6 (CBAVD) 74.5 ∆F508/711ϩ3AϾG 9T/7T Chronic cough MS19 (CBAVD) 51 W496X/F1052V 9T/9T MS24 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 D565G/R668C 7T/7T One mutation detected MS5 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 3272-26AϾG/- 7T/7T MS12 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 ∆F508/- 9T/7T MS14 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 ∆F508/- 9T/5T MS15 (CBAVD) 57.7 L732X/- 7T/5T Dehydration/recurrent bronchitis MS16 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 711ϩ3AϾG/- 7T/5T MS20 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 4010delTAT/- 7T/7T MS18 (ObsA) 48 ∆F508/- 5T/9T MS11 (ObsA) Ͻ40 R75Q/- 7T/7T MS23 (ObsA) Ͻ40 2790-8CϾG/- 7T/7T No mutation detected MS7 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/7T MS10 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/7T MS21 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/9T MS28 (CBAVD) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/7T MS2 (ObsA) 54.2 -/- 7T/7T MS8 (ObsA) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/7T MS17 (ObsA) 50 -/- 7T/7T MS22 (ObsA) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/9T MS25 (ObsA) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/7T MS26 (ObsA) Ͻ40 - / - 7T/7T MS27 (ObsA) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/7T MS3 (oligozoospermia) 50 -/- 7T/7T MS4 (oligozoospermia) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/7T MS13 (oligozoospermia) Ͻ40 -/- 7T/7T Table II.
X
ABCC7 p.Trp496* 9620832:64:519
status: NEW[hide] A novel nonsense mutation identified in the first ... Hum Mol Genet. 1994 Oct;3(10):1887-8. Balassopoulou A, Papadakis M, Loukopoulos D
A novel nonsense mutation identified in the first nucleotide binding fold of the CFTR gene in a Greek patient.
Hum Mol Genet. 1994 Oct;3(10):1887-8., [PMID:7531541]
Abstract [show]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
14 According to the adopted nomenclature (8) this mutation is defined as W496X.
X
ABCC7 p.Trp496* 7531541:14:70
status: NEW31 Lane 1: Father; W496X/normal V470 homozygote. Lane 2: Propositus; W496X/unknown mutation M470V compound. Lane 3: Normal exon 10 control: M470V compound. Lane 4: Mother; normal exon 10 homozygous for the M470 polymorphism. ; To whom correspondence should be addressed atUniversityofNorthCarolinaatChapelHillonOctober25,2012http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/Downloadedfrom Human Molecular Genetics, 1994, Vol. 3, No.
X
ABCC7 p.Trp496* 7531541:31:16
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Trp496* 7531541:31:66
status: NEW41 As a stop codon creating mutation, W496X is expected to result in severe phenotype of the propositus; unfortunately, the lack of knowledge of the other mutation of the patient, does not allow any further correlations.
X
ABCC7 p.Trp496* 7531541:41:35
status: NEW