ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Glu1554Gly

Predicted by SNAP2:	A: N (53%), C: D (53%), D: N (61%), F: D (59%), G: D (59%), H: D (53%), I: N (53%), K: N (53%), L: D (59%), M: D (59%), N: D (53%), P: D (59%), Q: N (53%), R: D (63%), S: N (53%), T: N (57%), V: N (57%), W: D (75%), Y: D (59%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: N, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: D, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: N, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Molecular diagnostic testing by eyeGENE: analysis ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 31;55(9):5510-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14359. Alapati A, Goetz K, Suk J, Navani M, Al-Tarouti A, Jayasundera T, Tumminia SJ, Lee P, Ayyagari R
Molecular diagnostic testing by eyeGENE: analysis of patients with hereditary retinal dystrophy phenotypes involving central vision loss.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 31;55(9):5510-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14359., [PMID:25082885]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To analyze the genetic test results of probands referred to eyeGENE with a diagnosis of hereditary maculopathy. METHODS: Patients with Best macular dystrophy (BMD), Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy (DHRD), Sorsby fundus dystrophy (SFD), or late-onset retinal degeneration (LORD) were screened for mutations in BEST1, EFEMP1, TIMP3, and CTRP5, respectively. Patients with pattern dystrophy (PD) were screened for mutations in PRPH2, BEST1, ELOVL4, CTRP5, and ABCA4; patients with cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) were screened for mutations in CRX, ABCA4, PRPH2, ELOVL4, and the c.2513G>A p.Arg838His variant in GUCY2D. Mutation analysis was performed by dideoxy sequencing. Impact of novel variants was evaluated using the computational tool PolyPhen. RESULTS: Among the 213 unrelated patients, 38 had BMD, 26 DHRD, 74 PD, 8 SFD, 6 LORD, and 54 CRD; six had both PD and BMD, and one had no specific clinical diagnosis. BEST1 variants were identified in 25 BMD patients, five with novel variants of unknown significance (VUS). Among the five patients with VUS, one was diagnosed with both BMD and PD. A novel EFEMP1 variant was identified in one DHRD patient. TIMP3 novel variants were found in two SFD patients, PRPH2 variants in 14 PD patients, ABCA4 variants in four PD patients, and p.Arg838His GUCY2D mutation in six patients diagnosed with dominant CRD; one patient additionally had a CRX VUS. ABCA4 mutations were identified in 15 patients with recessive CRD. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 213 samples, 55 patients (26%) had known causative mutations, and 13 (6%) patients had a VUS that was possibly pathogenic. Overall, selective screening for mutations in BEST1, PRPH2, and ABCA4 would likely yield the highest success rate in identifying the genetic basis for macular dystrophy phenotypes. Because of the overlap in phenotypes between BMD and PD, it would be beneficial to screen genes associated with both diseases.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
66 Mutations in PRPH2 (peripherin TABLE 2. Continued Patient Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Molecular Diagnosis Patient 22 ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Hom Mut Positive Patient 23, recessive ABCA4 43 c.5917delG Deletion Hom Mut Positive Patient 24, recessive ABCA4 32 c.4661A>G p.Glu1554Gly Het vAR/us Benign 0.326 Unconfirmed ABCA4 30 c.4383G>A p.Trp1461Stop Het Mut Patient 25, recessive ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut Positive ABCA4 22 c.3259G>A p.Glu1087Lys Het Mut Patient 26, recessive ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut Positive ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Het Mut Patient 27, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive Patient 28, recessive, case 5 PRPH2 1 c.514C>T p.Arg172Trp Het Mut Positive No specific clinical diagnosis Patient 1, case 1 ABCA4 35 c.4919G>A p.Arg1640Gln Het Mut Positive ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Het Mut ABCA4 IVS42 c.5898-11G>A NA Het vAR/us NA NA ABCA4 IVS48 c.6729&#fe;21C>T NA Het vAR/us NA NA Het, heterozygous; Mut, mutation; vAR, variant; VUS, variant of unknown significance. Login to comment
93 These variants included p.Arg1300Gln and p.Glu1554Gly. Login to comment
116 Mutations or Unknown Variants Detected in Patients With Central Vision Loss Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Frequency* Variant ID Late-onset retinal degeneration CTRP5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Sorsby fundus dystrophy TIMP3 1 c.113C>G p.Ser38Cys Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 2 TIMP3 5 c.610A>T p.Ser204Cys Het Mut 1 CM941325/ rs137853298 Doyne honeycomb dystrophy EFEMP1 9 c.1033C>T p.Arg345Trp Het Mut 2 CM990504 EFEMP1 IVS10 c.IVS10-14C>T None Het vAR/us NA NA 1 Best macular dystrophy BEST1 2 c.28G>A p.Ala10Thr Het Mut 1 CM982017 BEST1 2 c.47C>T p.Ser16Phe Het Mut 1 CM010520 BEST1 2 c.72G>T p.Trp24Cys Het Mut 1 CM982018 BEST1 3 c.240C>A p.Phe80Leu Het Mut 2 CM004423 BEST1 4 c.248G>C p.Gly83Ala Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 4 c.277T>C p.Trp93Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 4 c.279G>C p.Trp93Cys Het Mut 1 rs28940273/ CM982021 BEST1 6 c.652C>T p.Arg218Cys Het Mut 2 CM982023 BEST1 6 c.680A>G p.Tyr227Cys Het Mut 1 CM982024 BEST1 6 c.741G>A p.Arg218His Het Mut 2 CM003486 BEST1 7 c.727G>A p.Ala243Thr Het Mut 2 CM004434 BEST1 7 c.728C>T p.Ala243Val Het Mut 2 rs28940570/ CM00841 BEST1 8 c.880C>T p.Leu294Phe Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 8 c.887A>G p.Asn296Ser Het Mut 1 CM010524 BEST1 8 c.903T>G p.Asp301Glu Het Mut 2 CM991243 BEST1 8 c.910G>A p.Asp304Asn Het Mut 1 CM024219 BEST1 8 c.925T>C p.Trp309Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 8 c.929T>C p.Ile310Thr Het Mut 1 CM000843 BEST1 4 c.250T>G p.Phe84Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 Pattern dystrophy ABCA4 6 c.634C>T p.Arg212Cys Het Mut 1 rs61750200 ABCA4 17 c.2588G>C p.Gly863Ala Het Mut 1 CM970003/ rs76157638 ABCA4 IVS26 c.3862&#fe;3A>G Abnormal splicing Het vAR/us 1 NA ABCA4 30 c.4469G>A p.Cys1490Tyr Het Mut 1 CM990056/ rs61751402 ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut 1 CS057513 PRPH2 1 c.271T>A p.Tyr91Asn Het vAR/us Probably damaging .909 1 PRPH2 1 c.310-313del(AT) p.Ile104Val Het Mut 1 NA/Deletion PRPH2 1 c.422A>G p.Tyr141Cys Het Mut 2 CM010125/ rs61755781 PRPH2 1 c.515G>A p.Arg172Gln Het Mut 1 CM930637/ rs61755792 PRPH2 2 c.583C>T p.Arg195Stop Het Mut 1 CM032999 PRPH2 2 c.629C>G p.Pro210Arg Het Mut 1 CM941210 PRPH2 2 c.635G>C p.Ser212Thr Het Mut 1 CM971289/ rs61755801 PRPH2 2 c.683C>T p.Thr228Ile Het Mut 1 TMP_ESP_6_ 42672248 PRPH2 2 c.708C>G p.Tyr236Stop Het Mut 1 rs61755813 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut 4 CS010139 PRPH2 2 c.584G>A p.Arg195Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 TABLE 3. Continued Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Frequency* Variant ID Cone-rod dystrophy ABCA4 2 c.156T>G p.His52Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.998 1 ABCA4 3 c.161G>A p.Cys54Tyr Het Mut 1 CM990012/ rs150774447 ABCA4 28 c.4169T>C p.Leu1390Pro Het Mut 1 CM014810/ rs61752430 ABCA4 16 c.2385C>T p.Ser795Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.99 1 ABCA4 IVS40 c.5714&#fe;5G>A Splice Het Mut 1 CS982057 ABCA4 27 c.3899G>A p.Arg1300Gln Het vAR/us Benign 0.143 1 ABCA4 32 c.4661A>G p.Glu1554Gly Het vAR/us Benign 0.326 1 ABCA4 30 c.4383G>A p.Trp1461Stop Het Mut 1 Stop/NA ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut NA NA 2 CS057513 ABCA4 22 c.3259G>A p.Glu1087Lys Het Mut 1 CM970008/ rs61751398 ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Het Mut 2 CM970016/ rs1800553 ABCA4 45 c.6221G>T p.Gly2074Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 ABCA4 IVS42 c.5898&#fe;1G<A Splice Het Mut 1 CS011524 ABCA4 IVS42 c.5899-2delA Splice Het Mut 1 rs3112831 CRX 3 c.607T>C p.Ser213Pro Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.999 1 ABCA4 5 c.559C>T p.Arg187Cys Het Mut 1 COSM913472 ABCA4 40 c.5645T>C p.Met1882Thr Het Mut 1 rs4147830 ABCA4 6 c.768G>T p.Val256Val (abnlspl) Het Mut 1 CM990057/ rs61750152 ABCA4 31 c.4577C>T p.Thr1526Met Het Mut 1 rs62645944 ABCA4 11 c.1532G>A p.Arg511His Het Mut 1 rs140482171 ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Het Mut 1 CM990022/ rs61751392 ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Het Mut 1 CM970006/ rs61751374 ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Hom Mut 2 CM990022/ rs61751392 ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Hom Mut 2 CM970006/ rs61751374 ABCA4 22 c.3322C>T p.Arg1108Cys Het Mut 1 CM990039/ rs61750120 ABCA4 13 c.1927G>A p.Val643Met Het Mut 1 CM014293/ rs61749417/ rs143548435 ABCA4 24 c.3602T>G p.Leu1201Arg Het Mut 1 CM990042/ rs61750126 ABCA4 36 c.5186T>C p.Leu1729Pro Het Mut 1 CM990062/ rs61750567 ABCA4 13 c.1933G>A p.Asp645Asn Het Mut 1 rs617494181933 ABCA4 23 c.3364G>A p.Glu1122Lys Het Mut 1 CM990041 ABCA4 48 c.6529G>A p.Asp2177Asn Het Mut 1 CM970023/ rs1800555 ABCA4 35 c.4918C>T p.Arg1640Trp Het Mut 2 CM983728/ rs61751404 ABCA4 28 c.4222T>C p.Trp1408Arg Het Mut 1 CM990048/ rs61750135 GUCY2D 13 c.2512C>T p.Arg838Cys Het Mut 1 rs61750172 GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut 5 CM012606/ rs61750173 ABCA4 IVS7 c.859-9T>C Unknown Hom vAR/us NA NA 1 ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Hom Mut 1 CM970016/ rs1800553 ABCA4 43 c.5917delG Deletion Hom Mut 1 RISN_ABCR: c.5917delG Molecular Diagnostic Testing by eyeGENE IOVS j September 2014 j Vol. 55 j No. 9 j Six patients with late-onset retinal pathology and drusen had well-characterized clinical data. Login to comment