ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Gly91Ala

None has been submitted yet.

Publications

PMID: 9922376 [PubMed] Dawson DC et al: "CFTR: mechanism of anion conduction."

No. Sentence Comment

590 In addi-lectivity (see sect. IV), and in view of the roles of arginines in anion binding in other proteins (see sect. VE2), it is tion, Mansoura et al. (101) found that neutral (G91A), acidic (G91E), and basic (G91R) substitutions in this TMtempting to suggest that this TM might actually line the pore as suggested by the voltage-dependent accessibility had no effect on SCN binding or the sensitivity of the constructs to activation by IBMX, although the shape ofof some TM6 residues to MTS reagents (see sect. VF). Login to comment

PMID: 21998193 [PubMed] Patrick AE et al: "Alteration of CFTR transmembrane span integration by disease-causing mutations."

No. Sentence Comment

170 To investigate whether the mutant effects on folding and TM boundaries are caused by the loss of glycine or by the introduction of the ionizable group, the 85 and 91 positions were mutated to the neutral residue alanine (G91A and G85A). Login to comment
172 In the ECL-site assay, G91A and G85A N-terminal deletion constructs were glycosylated until a 14-residue deletion was partially glycosylated and a 16-residue deletion was not glycosylated (Figure 6A). Login to comment
173 L88 is at the edge of the TM1 ER integration profile edges for both G91A and G85A (Figure 6B), which are shifted by two or three residues from the WT TM1 ER integration profile edge. Login to comment
176 Role of the ionizable side chain in trafficking of G91R and G85E The data from the glycosylation assay demonstrate that the G85E mutant splits the integration profile of TM1, whereas the G91R, G85A, and G91A mutants do not. Login to comment
179 G91A is both core and complex glycosylated and traffics to the cell surface, indicating that introduction of arginine rather than loss of glycine causes G91R ER accumulation. Login to comment
180 Consistent with this, the G91A mutant has unaltered topology and WT-like degradation in X. laevis oocytes (Xiong et al., 1997). Login to comment
182 In stark contrast to G91A, G85A accumulates in the ER, suggesting that both introduction of charge and loss of glycine at position 85 contribute to G85E ER accumulation. Login to comment
185 At both temperatures, G91A traffics like WT CFTR. Login to comment
235 HeLa cell trafficking of WT, ΔF508, G85E, G85A, G91R, and G91A mutant CFTR at 37°C was analyzed by Western blot analysis (A). Login to comment
240 Figure 6: Experimental TM1 ER luminal integration profile edges for G91A and G85A mutant CFTR. Login to comment
241 (A) Core glycosylation analysis of G91A and G85A mutant CFTR containing the artificial ECL1 site by deletion of residues between the glycosylation site and TM1. Login to comment
244 (B) A combined schematic of the experimentally identified TM1 ER integration profiles for the G91A and G85A mutants. Login to comment
251 The data here and in previous reports indicate that G91R, but not G91A, disrupts CFTR trafficking in the cell and has significant effects on the stability and assembly of full-length CFTR (Xiong et al., 1997; Younger et al., 2006; Rosser et al., 2008; Du and Lukacs, 2009). Login to comment
286 The mutations G91R, G91A, G85E, and G85A were introduced into CFTR constructs containing the natural, artificial, and deletion mutants on the artificial site. Login to comment

PMID: 9512029 [PubMed] Mansoura MK et al: "Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) anion binding as a probe of the pore."

No. Sentence Comment

62 Expression levels Wild-type and 11 mutant CFTR constructs were used in this study: G91A, G91E, G91R, G314A, G314D, G314E, G314Q, K335R, K335A, K335D, and K335E. Login to comment
137 Permeability Ratios Wild type 4-9 3.42 Ϯ 0.28 1.42 Ϯ 0.04 1.22 Ϯ 0.02 0.39 Ϯ 0.01 0.44 Ϯ 0.03 G91A 3-6 3.24 Ϯ 0.26 1.53 Ϯ 0.04 1.27 Ϯ 0.02 0.37 Ϯ 0.04 0.40 Ϯ 0.04 G91E 3-7 3.50 Ϯ 0.54 1.59 Ϯ 0.04 1.27 Ϯ 0.01 0.35 Ϯ 0.01 0.51 Ϯ 0.04 G91R 3-4 5.26 ؎ 0.46* 1.60 Ϯ 0.03 1.40 ؎ 0.01* 0.32 Ϯ 0.04 0.64 ؎ 0.04* G314A 3-4 2.87 Ϯ 0.17 1.45 Ϯ 0.03 1.19 Ϯ 0.02 0.31 Ϯ 0.03 0.33 Ϯ 0.03 G314D 4 3.42 Ϯ 0.34 1.44 Ϯ 0.05 1.25 Ϯ 0.04 0.33 Ϯ 0.03 0.51 Ϯ 0.05 G314E 3-4 3.72 Ϯ 0.56 1.65 ؎ 0.09* 1.35 ؎ 0.03* 0.49 Ϯ 0.04 0.53 Ϯ 0.04 G314Q 3-4 3.89 Ϯ 0.37 1.62 Ϯ 0.11 1.27 Ϯ 0.04 0.36 Ϯ 0.03 0.62 Ϯ 0.05 K335R 3-5 3.44 Ϯ 0.29 1.35 Ϯ 0.04 1.22 Ϯ 0.03 0.40 Ϯ 0.05 0.41 Ϯ 0.07 K335A 5-6 5.34 ؎ 0.58* 1.48 Ϯ 0.06 1.28 Ϯ 0.04 0.37 Ϯ 0.03 0.60 Ϯ 0.06 K335D 4-6 3.02 Ϯ 0.19 1.50 Ϯ 0.03 1.10 ؎ 0.02* 0.54 ؎ 0.04* 0.65 ؎ 0.06* K335E 5-8 3.64 Ϯ 0.21 1.48 Ϯ 0.06 1.29 Ϯ 0.03 0.46 Ϯ 0.04 1.10 ؎ 0.04* B. Conductance Ratios Wild type 4-9 0.14 Ϯ 0.02 0.75 Ϯ 0.02 0.64 Ϯ 0.02 0.52 Ϯ 0.03 0.18 Ϯ 0.03 G91A 3-6 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 0.77 Ϯ 0.02 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.47 Ϯ 0.02 0.19 Ϯ 0.02 G91E 3-7 0.15 Ϯ 0.03 0.73 Ϯ 0.02 0.60 Ϯ 0.01 0.50 Ϯ 0.04 0.30 Ϯ 0.02 G91R 3-4 0.14 Ϯ 0.00 0.84 Ϯ 0.01 0.63 Ϯ 0.01 0.32 ؎ 0.01* 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 G314A 3-4 0.30 Ϯ 0.09 0.89 ؎ 0.01* 0.66 Ϯ 0.01 0.48 Ϯ 0.09 0.24 Ϯ 0.01 G314D 4 0.28 Ϯ 0.05 0.82 Ϯ 0.01 0.70 Ϯ 0.02 0.49 Ϯ 0.06 0.27 Ϯ 0.03 G314E 3-4 0.62 ؎ 0.07* 1.18 ؎ 0.04* 0.84 ؎ 0.05* 0.42 Ϯ 0.05 0.29 Ϯ 0.09 G314Q 3-4 0.63 ؎ 0.02* 1.01 ؎ 0.04* 0.82 ؎ 0.03* 0.50 Ϯ 0.02 0.42 ؎ 0.02* K335R 3-5 0.14 Ϯ 0.01 0.76 Ϯ 0.03 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.59 Ϯ 0.06 0.16 Ϯ 0.03 K335A 6 0.20 Ϯ 0.03 0.77 Ϯ 0.02 0.61 Ϯ 0.02 0.45 Ϯ 0.03 0.21 Ϯ 0.02 K335D 4-6 0.65 ؎ 0.04* 1.25 ؎ 0.02* 0.89 ؎ 0.02* 0.61 Ϯ 0.06 0.58 ؎ 0.06* K335E 5-8 0.50 ؎ 0.06* 1.19 ؎ 0.03* 0.89 ؎ 0.02* 0.53 Ϯ 0.03 0.48 ؎ 0.03* (A) The apparent permeability ratios (PS/PCl) for each substitute anion were calculated from the shift in reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz relation (noted in Materials and Methods). Login to comment
165 Concentration-dependent activation of G91A, G91E, and G91R CFTR was not discernibly different from that of wtCFTR. Login to comment
169 TABLE 4 Quantitative analyses of the macroscopic I-V shape changes Mutant ⌬ Net charge n RR g(ϩ30)/g(-30) RR/RRWT Wild type 5 1.220 Ϯ 0.06 1.00 G91A 0 4 1.293 Ϯ 0.06 1.06 G91E -1 5 1.512 ؎ 0.10* 1.24 G91R 1 4 8.041 ؎ 0.87* 6.59 G314A 0 4 1.201 Ϯ 0.09 0.98 G314D -1 4 1.362 Ϯ 0.08 1.12 G314E -1 7 1.405 Ϯ 0.08 1.15 G314Q 0 5 1.376 Ϯ 0.10 1.13 K335R 0 4 1.209 Ϯ 0.06 0.99 K335A -1 4 1.295 Ϯ 0.07 1.06 K335D -2 5 0.762 ؎ 0.02* 0.62 K335E -2 4 0.919 ؎ 0.02* 0.75 The slope conductance was measured at ϩ30 mV and -30 mV with respect to the reversal potential. Login to comment
173 TABLE 5 Concentration-dependent activation of wtCFTR, G91, G314, and K335 variants by IBMX in the presence of 10 ␮M forskolin Mutant n K1/2(IBMX) (mM) Wild type 15 0.35 Ϯ 0.04 G91A 5 0.42 Ϯ 0.06 G91E 8 0.51 ؎ 0.06* G91R 5 0.49 Ϯ 0.09 G314A 10 1.21 ؎ 0.11* G314D 3 1.35 ؎ 0.16* G314E 8 6.39 ؎ 1.35* G314Q 4 14.26 ؎ 6.64* K335R 4 0.46 Ϯ 0.04 K335A 2 0.35 Ϯ 0.15 K335D 7 0.87 ؎ 0.13* K335E 3 0.95 ؎ 0.07* The steady-state slope conductance was measured at -60 mV as increasing concentrations of IBMX (0.02-5.0 mM) were added to the perfusate in the continued presence of 10 mM forskolin. Login to comment
198 The results presented here are consistent with the notion that the binding of anions within the CFTR pore is a sensitive indicator of changes in pore structure whereas permeability ratios appear to be rather insensitive to similar TABLE 6 Qualitative summary of the functional consequences of mutations at G91, G314, and K335 Property G91 (TM1) K335 (TM6) G314 (TM5) G91A G91E G91R K335R K335A K335D K335E G314A G314D G314E G314Q I-V shape - - ϩϩϩ - - ϩϩ ϩ - - - - Psub/PCl - - - - - - ϩϩ - - - - gsub/gCl - - - - - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩ - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ SCN- binding - - - - - ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩ - ϩϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ Activation - - - - - ϩϩ ϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ ϩϩϩϩ Results are expressed as follows: -, function of the CFTR construct with the indicated substitution was indistinguishable from wild type; ϩ to ϩϩϩϩ, semiquantitative indication of the magnitude of the change in the function compared with wild type. Login to comment
138 Permeability Ratios Wild type 4-9 3.42 afe; 0.28 1.42 afe; 0.04 1.22 afe; 0.02 0.39 afe; 0.01 0.44 afe; 0.03 G91A 3-6 3.24 afe; 0.26 1.53 afe; 0.04 1.27 afe; 0.02 0.37 afe; 0.04 0.40 afe; 0.04 G91E 3-7 3.50 afe; 0.54 1.59 afe; 0.04 1.27 afe; 0.01 0.35 afe; 0.01 0.51 afe; 0.04 G91R 3-4 5.26 d1e; 0.46* 1.60 afe; 0.03 1.40 d1e; 0.01* 0.32 afe; 0.04 0.64 d1e; 0.04* G314A 3-4 2.87 afe; 0.17 1.45 afe; 0.03 1.19 afe; 0.02 0.31 afe; 0.03 0.33 afe; 0.03 G314D 4 3.42 afe; 0.34 1.44 afe; 0.05 1.25 afe; 0.04 0.33 afe; 0.03 0.51 afe; 0.05 G314E 3-4 3.72 afe; 0.56 1.65 d1e; 0.09* 1.35 d1e; 0.03* 0.49 afe; 0.04 0.53 afe; 0.04 G314Q 3-4 3.89 afe; 0.37 1.62 afe; 0.11 1.27 afe; 0.04 0.36 afe; 0.03 0.62 afe; 0.05 K335R 3-5 3.44 afe; 0.29 1.35 afe; 0.04 1.22 afe; 0.03 0.40 afe; 0.05 0.41 afe; 0.07 K335A 5-6 5.34 d1e; 0.58* 1.48 afe; 0.06 1.28 afe; 0.04 0.37 afe; 0.03 0.60 afe; 0.06 K335D 4-6 3.02 afe; 0.19 1.50 afe; 0.03 1.10 d1e; 0.02* 0.54 d1e; 0.04* 0.65 d1e; 0.06* K335E 5-8 3.64 afe; 0.21 1.48 afe; 0.06 1.29 afe; 0.03 0.46 afe; 0.04 1.10 d1e; 0.04* B. Conductance Ratios Wild type 4-9 0.14 afe; 0.02 0.75 afe; 0.02 0.64 afe; 0.02 0.52 afe; 0.03 0.18 afe; 0.03 G91A 3-6 0.14 afe; 0.01 0.77 afe; 0.02 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.47 afe; 0.02 0.19 afe; 0.02 G91E 3-7 0.15 afe; 0.03 0.73 afe; 0.02 0.60 afe; 0.01 0.50 afe; 0.04 0.30 afe; 0.02 G91R 3-4 0.14 afe; 0.00 0.84 afe; 0.01 0.63 afe; 0.01 0.32 d1e; 0.01* 0.14 afe; 0.01 G314A 3-4 0.30 afe; 0.09 0.89 d1e; 0.01* 0.66 afe; 0.01 0.48 afe; 0.09 0.24 afe; 0.01 G314D 4 0.28 afe; 0.05 0.82 afe; 0.01 0.70 afe; 0.02 0.49 afe; 0.06 0.27 afe; 0.03 G314E 3-4 0.62 d1e; 0.07* 1.18 d1e; 0.04* 0.84 d1e; 0.05* 0.42 afe; 0.05 0.29 afe; 0.09 G314Q 3-4 0.63 d1e; 0.02* 1.01 d1e; 0.04* 0.82 d1e; 0.03* 0.50 afe; 0.02 0.42 d1e; 0.02* K335R 3-5 0.14 afe; 0.01 0.76 afe; 0.03 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.59 afe; 0.06 0.16 afe; 0.03 K335A 6 0.20 afe; 0.03 0.77 afe; 0.02 0.61 afe; 0.02 0.45 afe; 0.03 0.21 afe; 0.02 K335D 4-6 0.65 d1e; 0.04* 1.25 d1e; 0.02* 0.89 d1e; 0.02* 0.61 afe; 0.06 0.58 d1e; 0.06* K335E 5-8 0.50 d1e; 0.06* 1.19 d1e; 0.03* 0.89 d1e; 0.02* 0.53 afe; 0.03 0.48 d1e; 0.03* (A) The apparent permeability ratios (PS/PCl) for each substitute anion were calculated from the shift in reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz relation (noted in Materials and Methods). Login to comment