ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Ile331Cys

None has been submitted yet.

Publications

PMID: 18056267 [PubMed] Beck EJ et al: "Conformational changes in a pore-lining helix coupled to cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator channel gating."

No. Sentence Comment

93 Both Cd2ϩ and MTSEA had significant effects on the conductances of only five (I331C, L333C, R334C, K335C, and T338C) of the 26 Cys-substituted channels examined. Login to comment
100 The oocytes 750 500 250 0 µS 180012006000 s IBMX MTSEA Cd 2+ DTT 200 100 0 µS 180012006000 s IBMX DTT Cd 2+ MTSEA A B C -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 % Change in conductance Y325C A326C L327C I328C K329C G330C I331C I332C L333C R334C K335C I336C F337C T338C T339C I340C S341C F342C WT I344C V345C R347C M348C A349C V350C T351C Q353C * * * * * Cd 2+ 1mM MTSEA 1mM D FIGURE 1. Login to comment
127 For example, whereas L333C in the Glu1371 (WT) channel was inhibited by either Cd2ϩ or MTSEA, neither reagent was particularly effective when this mutation was present in the Gln1371 background 200 150 100 50 0 µS 15001000500 s IBMX Cd 2+ MTSEA DTT -80 -60 -40 -20 0 % Change in conductance I331C L333C R334C K335C T338C Cd 2+ aM Cd 2+ bM Cd 2+ uM A B FIGURE 2. Login to comment
131 B, summary of effects of Cd2ϩ on MTSEA-modified I331C, L333C, R334C, K335C, and T338C channels. Login to comment
135 MTSEA 1371Q 600 400 200 µS 200150100500 s Cd 2+ 1371E -40 0 40 % Change in conductance I331C L333C R334C K335C T338C 1371E 1371Q * * * -80 -60 -40 -20 0 % Change in conductance I331C L333C R334C K335C T338C * * * 1371Q 800 600 400 µS 2001000 s MTSEA 1371E B D E 1 2 30 s1 pAWT; Po=0.18 A 3 1 2 100 s1 pAE1371Q; Po=0.94 C FIGURE 3. Login to comment
153 The differences between Glu1371 and Gln1371 backgrounds in the effects of Cd2ϩ and MTSEA on I331C, L333C, R334C, K335C, and T338C channels are summarized in Fig. 3 (C and E), respectively. Login to comment
159 In contrast, I331C, L333C, and K335C reacted faster in the Glu1371 background (Fig. 4, B and C). Login to comment
160 These results reveal clearly that modification of I331C, L333C, and K335C by both these reagents was much slower in the Gln1371 mutational background than in the WT Glu1371 channels. Login to comment
168 CFTR Conformation Changes during Gating FEBRUARY 22, 2008•VOLUME 283•NUMBER 8 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 4961 decrease, and I331C reacted 5-fold slower (Fig. 4, B and C) in E1371Q channels. Login to comment
181 For I331C, the inhibitory effect of both MTSEA and MTSES was larger under minimally active conditions. Login to comment
185 However, I331C and L333C channels had a significantly faster modification rate, when minimally active. Login to comment
186 When stimulated by 0.02 mM IBMX, both I331C and L333C reacted nearly 25 times faster with MTSEA and nearly 10-20 times faster with MTSES. Login to comment
187 These results suggest that when CFTR Channel Po is low, residues I331C and L33C react quite rapidly with MTS reagents, and as the Po increases their reactivity decreases correspondingly. Login to comment
188 EvidenceforTM6MovementAssociatedwithChannelGating- The state-dependent reactivity of the MTS reagents with I331C, L333C, and K335C channels could indicate a change in the water accessibility of these residues caused by a conformational change in TM6 or by an alteration in the local environment surrounding these residues. Login to comment
192 For two of the three mutants, I331C and L333C, modification with MTSET profoundly affected channel gating (Fig. 7A). Login to comment
193 The open probabilities of MTSET-modified I331C and L333C channels were significantly smaller than those of unmodified channels. Login to comment
196 These results indicate that MTSET reduces the whole cell conductance of I331C- and L333C-expressing oocytes by inhibiting channel gating and not by affecting channel permeation properties. Login to comment
197 Kinetic analyses of channel gating revealed that the decrease in open probability of MTSET-modified I331C and L333C channels was primarily because of an increase in the mean interburst duration of the A B 1.00.50.0 G0.02/ G1 I331C L333C R334C K335C T338C 200 100 0 µS 8006004002000 s 0.02 1 IBMX (mM) C -100 100 % Change in conductance I331C L333C R334C K335C T338C 0.02 mM IBMX 1 mM IBMX * * * * -80 -60 -40 -20 0 % Change in conductance I331C L333C R334C K335C T338C * * * MTSEA MTSES FIGURE5.EffectsofMTSEA,andMTSESdependonCFTRactivationlevels. Login to comment
216 Although both studies identified I331C, L333C, R334C, and K335C as accessible to MTS reagents, we find that MTSEA increased the conductance of R334C- and K335C-expressing oocytes, whereas it was reported in the previous study to decrease channel currents. Login to comment
223 It is possible that this mutation rather than the open 150 125 100 %G/Gi 600 s K335C I-1.0; 10 µM I-0.02; 10 µM 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 Modification rate (M -1 s -1 ) I331C L333C R334C K335C T338C 100 50 %G/Gi 3002001000 s I-1.0; 100 µM I-0.02;10 µM MTSEA I331CL333CR334CK335CT338C 100 75 50 25 0 %G/Gi 180120600 s I-0.02; 10 µM I-1.0; 10 µM 200 150 100 %G/Gi 120600 s I-0.02; 10 µM I-1.0; 10 µM 100 75 50 %G/Gi 3602401200 s I-1.0; 100 µM I-0.02; 10 µM 100 80 60 %G/Gi 9060300 s K335C I-1.0; 10 µM I-0.02; 10 µM 100 50 %G/Gi 180120600 s T338C I-1.0; 10 µM I-0.02; 10 µM 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 Modification rate (M -1 s -1 ) I331C L333C R334C K335C T338C MTSES 100 75 50 25 %G/Gi 120600 s I-1.0; 10 µM I-0.02; 10 µM 100 75 50 %G/Gi 3602401200 s I-1.0; 100 µM I-0.02; 10 µM 100 75 %G/Gi 180120600 s I-0.02; 100 µM I-1.0; 1 mM A B FIGURE 6. Login to comment
240 It must be pointed out that under low IBMX concentrations, a 5-fold decrease in CFTR Po cannot account for the entire differences in reactivity of I331C and L333C. Login to comment
242 Hence, a small fraction of the increased reactivity of I331C, and L333C at low IBMX concentrations could be due to a relief from this block, although such an increase in reactivity is not observed for R334C and T338C. Login to comment

PMID: 19381710 [PubMed] Fatehi M et al: "Novel residues lining the CFTR chloride channel pore identified by functional modification of introduced cysteines."

No. Sentence Comment

177 Effects of external MTS reagents on the gating of CFTR cysteine mutants (I331C, L333C) have been described (Beck et al. 2008) but would presumably not be noticed using our experimental approach. Login to comment

PMID: 19754156 [PubMed] Alexander C et al: "Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator: using differential reactivity toward channel-permeant and channel-impermeant thiol-reactive probes to test a molecular model for the pore."

No. Sentence Comment

52 We proposed that these spontaneous changes, that are not seen in either wt or Cys-less CFTR, reflect the coordination of trace Table 1: Percent Change in Oocyte Conductance in the Presence of Compounda MTSETþ MTSES- [Ag(CN)2]- [Au(CN)2]- G330C O O O O I331C -51.6 ( 6.3 -28.9 ( 2.1 -63.1 ( 8.8 O I332C O O O O L333C -58.5 ( 4.8 -47.5 ( 7.6 -83.1 ( 2.2 O R334C þ76.9 ( 11.3 -84.4 ( 1.5 -67.4 ( 7.4 -41.4 ( 3.1 K335C þ10.7 ( 2.4 -37.3 ( 1.5 -29.1 ( 6.4 -54.6 ( 4.7 I336C -54.4 ( 7.9 -75.0 ( 0.6 -81.2 ( 10.5 O F337C O O -89.6 ( 1.9 -90.1 ( 1.3 T338C -37.1 ( 3.3 -85.4 ( 2.5 -75.0 ( 5.2 -88.3 ( 1.6 T339C O O -24.5 ( 7.2 O I340C O O -93.8 ( 1.0 O S341C O O -49.3 ( 4.8 O F342C O O -84.7 ( 1.8 O C343 O O O O I344C O O -66.9 ( 9.3 -77.9 ( 2.1 V345C O O -49.1 ( 9.3 O L346C O O O O R347C O O O O M348C O O -47.9 ( 8.8 -50.1 ( 3.3 A349C O O -19.0 ( 2.0 O V350C O O O O T351C O O O O R352C O O -77.5 ( 1.3 O Q353C O O -72.6 ( 4.5 -76.7 ( 2.8 a Values are means ( SE of three or more oocytes. Login to comment
271 Beck et al. (9) reported that modification of I331C or L333C CFTR channels results in a profound reduction in open probability, and the authors suggested that these sites may experience significant movement during the gating cycle. Login to comment

PMID: 9922376 [PubMed] Dawson DC et al: "CFTR: mechanism of anion conduction."

No. Sentence Comment

479 The cationic reagent also the results in terms of pore structure relies on the assumption that the only water-accessible surface at which engi-produced inhibition in one construct (I331C) in which the anionic MTSES0 did not. Login to comment

PMID: 9089437 [PubMed] Cheung M et al: "Locating the anion-selectivity filter of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channel."

No. Sentence Comment

107 We did not measure the reaction rate constants for the most extracellular residue, I331C, because we thought that it was unlikely that the reaction rates would be voltage dependent given the absence of voltage dependence at the adjacent, more cytoplasmic residues. We also did not measure the reaction rate constants for the mutants I344C and R347C because, although MTSEAϩ reacted with these residues, MTSES- and MTSETϩ did not react with these k ψ( )( )ln k Ψ 0=( )( ) zFδ RT/( )-ln ψ= t a b l e i Second-order Rate Constants for the Reaction of the MTS Reagents with the Water-exposed Cysteine Mutants k ES (M-1s-1) k EA (M-1s-1) k ET (M-1s-1) mutant -25 mV -50 mV -75 mV -25 mV -50 mV -75 mV -25 mV -50 mV -75 mV L333C 71 Ϯ 3(3) 71 Ϯ 20(2) 71 Ϯ 23(3) 320 Ϯ 89(2) 320 Ϯ 128(2) 333 Ϯ 139(3) 952 Ϯ 136(2) 1,000 Ϯ 350(2) 1,053 Ϯ 443(2) R334C 48 Ϯ 14(2) 48 Ϯ 6(3) 44 Ϯ 8(4) 145 Ϯ 32(2) 163 Ϯ 7(2) 182 Ϯ 21(3) 444 Ϯ 49(2) 454 Ϯ 124(2) 588 Ϯ 95(3) K335C 36 Ϯ 20(3) 23 Ϯ 11(3) 27 Ϯ 16(3) 222 Ϯ 80(3) 121 Ϯ 51(4) 107 Ϯ 30(3) 217 Ϯ 111(3) 235 Ϯ 28(3) 217 Ϯ 95(4) F337C 91 Ϯ 17(2) 80 Ϯ 22(3) 71 Ϯ 20(4) 222 Ϯ 74(2) 222 Ϯ 86(3) 285 Ϯ 81(3) 740 Ϯ 246(3) 740 Ϯ 82(2) 714 Ϯ 51(2) S341C 56 Ϯ 18(3) 56 Ϯ 40(2) 43 Ϯ 12(3) 93 Ϯ 6(3) 110 Ϯ 22(3) 138 Ϯ 34(3) 690 Ϯ 356(3) 556 Ϯ 246(3) 800 Ϯ 224(4) T351C 100 Ϯ 25(5) 57 Ϯ 6(3) 26 Ϯ 9(6) 146 Ϯ 30(4) 195 Ϯ 42(4) 296 Ϯ 18(3) 308 Ϯ 47(10) 392 Ϯ 78(6) 769 Ϯ 89(5) R352C 42 Ϯ 4(3) 26 Ϯ 4(5) 21 Ϯ 6(4) 105 Ϯ 76(3) 137 Ϯ 46(3) 205 Ϯ 58(2) 417 Ϯ 138(4) 800 Ϯ 128(2) 952 Ϯ 408(2) Q353C 125 Ϯ 23(4) 51 Ϯ 12(4) 42 Ϯ 8(4) 83 Ϯ 24(4) 116 Ϯ 42(4) 160 Ϯ 92(3) 189 Ϯ 48(6) 220 Ϯ 48(3) 625 Ϯ 273(4) residues and therefore we could not determine the charge selectivity at these positions.2 The reaction rate constants that we have measured are between 10-and 500-fold slower than the rates of reaction with sulfhydryls in free solution (Table II) (Stauffer and Karlin, 1994). Login to comment