ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Lys1060Thr

[switch to full view]
Comments [show]

III (gating defect) <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823392">Veit et al.</a>
admin on 2016-08-19 15:16:22

Publications

PMID: 10875853 [PubMed] Casals T et al: "Heterogeneity for mutations in the CFTR gene and clinical correlations in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens."

No. Sentence Comment

98 Vasograms performed in six patients with CUAVD E92K/- 5T/7T 1 not only confirmed ultrasonographic findings, but also showed 711ϩ1G→T/- 5T/7T 1 additional abnormalities at various levels of the seminal tract.R334W/- 5T/7T 1 S549R/- 5T/7T 1 The volume and consistency of testes was normal, except in 1949del84/- 5T/7T 1 patients with other concomitant pathologies, such as crypt- K1060T/- 5T/7T 1 orchidism (n ϭ 6), trauma (n ϭ 2), orchitis (n ϭ 2) orR1162X/- 5T/7T 1 S1235R/- 5T/7T 1 tumour (n ϭ 1). Login to comment

PMID: 18193900 [PubMed] Cheung JC et al: "Misfolding of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and disease."

No. Sentence Comment

90 In some additional examples, a number of mutations found in the fourth intracellular loop (H1054D, G1061R, L1065P, R1066C/H/L, Q1071P, L1077P, H1085R, W1098R, M1101K/ R) also affect the biosynthetic processing of CFTR (although function was not tested) (73); some intracellular loop 4 mutants (F1052V, K1060T, A1067T, G1069R, R1070Q/W) can process CFTR to the complex-glycosylated ("Band C") form but have altered channel activity compared to wild type. Login to comment

PMID: 8702904 [PubMed] Cotten JF et al: "Effect of cystic fibrosis-associated mutations in the fourth intracellular loop of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator."

No. Sentence Comment

31 2 R1066S (C. Fe´rec, I. Quere, C. Verlingue, O. Raguenes, M.-P. Au- drezet, and B. Mercier, personal communication), F1074L (T. Casals, M. D. Ramos, J. Gime´nez, V. Nunes, and X. Estivill, personal communication), K1060T (T. Casals, M. Chillo´n, V. Nunes, J. Gime´nez, M. D. Ramos, and X. Estivill, personal communication), L1065R (T. Casals, M. D. Ramos, J. Gime´nez, V. Nunes, and X. Estivill, personal communication), T1086I (T. Bienvenu, S. Bousquet, C. Herbulot, C. Beldjord, and J. C. Kaplan, personal communication), and R1070W (M. Macek, S. Sedriks, S. Kiesewetter, and G. R. Cutting, personal communication). Login to comment

PMID: 8662892 [PubMed] Seibert FS et al: "Disease-associated mutations in the fourth cytoplasmic loop of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator compromise biosynthetic processing and chloride channel activity."

No. Sentence Comment

64 The mature forms of the other six mutants (F1052V, K1060T, A1067T, G1069R, R1070W, R1070Q) were produced in relatively normal amounts (band C), although for A1067T and R1070W CFTR the ratio of the complex-glycosylated to core-glycosylated bands was significantly lower than for wild-type CFTR. Login to comment
81 This showed that the level of activity for cells expressing each CFTR mutant did approximately correspond to the amount of mature protein in the sample, i.e. in COS-1 cells F1052V, K1060T, and G1069R produced efflux levels similar to wild-type CFTR in accordance with a level of protein expression similar to wild type. Login to comment
88 Other disease-causing CFTR mutants, which are appropriately processed and trafficked to the plasma membrane, show defective ion conduction properties (e.g. R334W, R347H, and R347P; Sheppard et al., 1993; Tabcharani et al., 1993) or defective regulation of channel activity (e.g. G551S, G1244E, S1255P, and G1349D; Anderson and Welsh, 1992). Login to comment
127 Symbols are as follows: A: छ, WT; E, F1052V; Ç, K1060T; µ, A1067T; Ⅺ, vector only control. Login to comment
142 A, examples of wild-type, F1052V, K1060T, A1067T, G1069R, R1070Q, and R1070W CFTR single channel currents recorded from inside-out membrane patches at a membrane potential of -30 mV. Login to comment
71 The mature forms of the other six mutants (F1052V, K1060T, A1067T, G1069R, R1070W, R1070Q) were produced in relatively normal amounts (band C), although for A1067T and R1070W CFTR the ratio of the complex-glycosylated to core-glycosylated bands was significantly lower than for wild-type CFTR. Login to comment
133 Symbols are as follows: A: L, WT; E, F1052V; &#c7;, K1060T; &#b5;, A1067T; M, vector only control. Login to comment
148 A, examples of wild-type, F1052V, K1060T, A1067T, G1069R, R1070Q, and R1070W CFTR single channel currents recorded from inside-out membrane patches at a membrane potential of 230 mV. Login to comment

PMID: 21374513 [PubMed] Schwarz M et al: "Methods for screening in cystic fibrosis."

No. Sentence Comment

82 For example the mutations AEl15 and K1060T, aswell asAF508, G542X, and RI 17H have been seenm CBAVD (29). Login to comment

PMID: 7739684 [PubMed] Chillon M et al: "Mutations in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens."

No. Sentence Comment

74 OF PATIENTS POLYT GENOTYPE† ⌬F508/R668C ⌬F508/D1152H ⌬F508/D1270N ⌬F508/R75L ⌬F508/R117H ⌬F508/L206W ⌬F508/R258G ⌬F508/S1235R ⌬F508/R347H ⌬F508/R347H R117H/G1349D R117H/712-1G→T G149R/R668C R347H/R1066H R553X/R668C R1070W/2869insG ⌬F508/- G542X/- W1282X/- R334W/- K1060T/- R1162X/- N1303K/- A800G/- ⌬F508/- ⌬F508/- ⌬F508/- ⌬E115/- R117H/- R347H/- G542X/- R553X/- 1677delTA/- 2184delA/- 2789ϩ5G→Α/- S1235R/- W1282X/- -/- -/- -/- -/- 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 19 9T/7T 9T/7T 9T/7T 9T/7T 9T/7T 9T/9T 9T/7T 9T/7T 9T/7T 9T/9T 7T/7T 7T/9T 9T/7T 9T/7T 7T/7T 7T/7T 9T/5T 9T/5T 7T/5T 7T/5T 7T/5T 7T/5T 9T/5T 5T/5T 9T/7T 9T/9T 7T/7T 7T/7T 7T/7T 9T/7T 9T/7T 7T/7T 7T/7T 7T/7T 7T/7T 7T/9T 7T/7T 9T/5T 7T/5T 5T/5T 7T/7T -/- 3 7T/9T *Data were obtained from the Spanish population analyzed in this study. Login to comment

PMID: 7532150 [PubMed] Casals T et al: "Extensive analysis of 40 infertile patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens: in 50% of cases only one CFTR allele could be detected."

No. Sentence Comment

7 A second new mutation was found in exon 17b, viz., an A--~C substitution at position 3311, changing lysine to threonine at codon 1060 (K1060T). Login to comment
76 For the observed changes, we considered the strong association between mutations and CFTR microsatellite haplo- K1060T AaCTsor,~AcA~_ QA.,~ATaG .c ' {i a ;, ' ! Login to comment
86 One abnormal pattern in exon 17b was caused by an A--~C substitution at position 3311, changing lysine to threonine at codon 1060 (K1060T); this is a new missense mutation in the CFTR gene (Fig. 3). Login to comment
103 In 13 cases, the mutations are known to be associated with severe CF (AF508, G542X, Rl162X and 1677delTA), whereas in five cases, the phenotypic effect of the mutation is still unknown (AEll5, K1060T, R334W, R1070W, and 2789 + 5G---)A); in one case (Rll7H), the mutation is known to result in mild CE Of these mutations, R334W seems to cause pancreatic insufficiency with a variable age of onset (X. Estivill, in press), whereas mutation 2789 + 5G--)A (W. E. Jr. High- smith, personal communication to the CFGAC) has frequently been found in adult CF patients and is probably involved in a mild phenotype (T. Casals et al. unpublished). Login to comment
116 The two new mutations detected here (AEll5 and K1060T) are located in transmembranic domains of CFTR, where it is well known that changes affect ion-channel transport (Cheng et al. 1990). Login to comment
119 For mutation K1060T, the lysine residue is conserved in the mouse, bovine, and Xenopus (Tucker et al. 1992), suggesting that this position in the second transmembrane domain might be more crucial. Login to comment
121 Although there is no doubt about the involvement of AE115 and K1060T in CBAVD, the genuine clinical significance of these two new mutations cannot be established, since only one mutation was detected in each individual. Login to comment
122 Further examples of mutations AE115 and K1060T should provide appropriate phenotype/genotype correlations. Login to comment

PMID: 23891399 [PubMed] Van Goor F et al: "Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mutations associated with defects in protein processing or function."

No. Sentence Comment

44 None M1V A46D E56K P67L R74W G85E E92K D110E D110H R117C R117H E193K L206W R334W I336K T338I S341P R347H R347P R352Q A455E L467P S492F F508del V520F A559T R560S R560T A561E Y569D D579G R668C L927P S945L S977F L997F F1052V H1054D K1060T L1065P R1066C R1066H R1066M A1067T R1070Q R1070W F1074L L1077P H1085R M1101K D1152H S1235R D1270N N1303K 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 * * * CFTR Mutation mRNA (% Normal CFTR) Fig. 1. Login to comment
64 Mutant CFTR form CFTR processing Mature/total % Normal CFTR Normal 0.89 &#b1; 0.01 100.0 &#b1; 18.5 G85E -0.05 &#b1; 0.04 -1.0 &#b1; 0.9 R560S 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 R1066C 0.02 &#b1; 0.01 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 S492F 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 R560T 0.01 &#b1; 0.01 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 V520F 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 M1101K 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 A561E 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 R1066M 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.4 N1303K 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.3 A559T 0.16 &#b1; 0.09 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 M1V 0.06 &#b1; 0.06 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 Y569D 0.11 &#b1; 0.04 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 R1066H 0.08 &#b1; 0.02a 0.7 &#b1; 0.2a L1065P 0.05 &#b1; 0.05 1.0 &#b1; 0.8 L467P 0.10 &#b1; 0.07 1.2 &#b1; 0.8 L1077P 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 1.5 &#b1; 0.6 A46D 0.21 &#b1; 0.08 1.9 &#b1; 0.5a E92K 0.06 &#b1; 0.05 1.9 &#b1; 1.3 H1054D 0.09 &#b1; 0.04 1.9 &#b1; 0.8 F508del 0.09 &#b1; 0.02a 2.3 &#b1; 0.5a H1085R 0.06 &#b1; 0.01a 3.0 &#b1; 0.7a I336K 0.42 &#b1; 0.05a 6.5 &#b1; 0.7a L206W 0.35 &#b1; 0.10a 6.8 &#b1; 1.7a F1074L 0.52 &#b1; 0.03a 10.9 &#b1; 0.6a A455E 0.26 &#b1; 0.10a 11.5 &#b1; 2.5a E56K 0.29 &#b1; 0.04a 12.2 &#b1; 1.5a R347P 0.48 &#b1; 0.04a 14.6 &#b1; 1.8a R1070W 0.61 &#b1; 0.04a 16.3 &#b1; 0.6a P67L 0.36 &#b1; 0.04a 28.4 &#b1; 6.8a R1070Q 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a 29.5 &#b1; 1.4a S977F 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a 37.3 &#b1; 2.4a A1067T 0.78 &#b1; 0.03a 38.6 &#b1; 6.1a D579G 0.72 &#b1; 0.02a 39.3 &#b1; 3.1a D1270N 1.00 &#b1; 0.00a,c 40.7 &#b1; 1.2a S945L 0.65 &#b1; 0.04a 42.4 &#b1; 8.9a L927P 0.89 &#b1; 0.01a,b 43.5 &#b1; 2.5a,b R117C 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 49.1 &#b1; 2.9a,b T338I 0.93 &#b1; 0.03a,b 54.2 &#b1; 3.7a,b L997F 0.90 &#b1; 0.04a,b 59.8 &#b1; 10.4a,b D110H 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a,b 60.6 &#b1; 1.5a,b S341P 0.79 &#b1; 0.02a 65.0 &#b1; 4.9a,b R668C 0.94 &#b1; 0.03a,b 68.5 &#b1; 1.9a,b R74W 0.78 &#b1; 0.01a 69.0 &#b1; 2.7a,b D110E 0.92 &#b1; 0.05a,b 87.5 &#b1; 9.5a,b R334W 0.91 &#b1; 0.05a,b 97.6 &#b1; 10.0a,b K1060T 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 109.9 &#b1; 28.0a,b R347H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 120.7 &#b1; 2.8a,b S1235R 0.96 &#b1; 0.00a,c 139.0 &#b1; 9.0a,b E193K 0.84 &#b1; 0.02a,b 143.0 &#b1; 17.1a,b R117H 0.86 &#b1; 0.01a,b 164.5 &#b1; 34.2a,b R352Q 0.98 &#b1; 0.01a,b 179.9 &#b1; 8.0a,c F1052V 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a,b 189.9 &#b1; 33.1a,b D1152H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 312.0 &#b1; 45.5a,b Notes to Table 1: Quantification of steady-state CFTR maturation expressed as the mean (&#b1;SEM; n = 5-9) ratio of mature CFTR to total CFTR (immature plus mature) or level of mature mutant CFTR relative to mature normal-CFTR (% normal CFTR) in FRT cells individually expressing CFTR mutations. Login to comment
74 Because the level of CFTR mRNA was similar across the panel of cell lines tested, the range in baseline activity and ivacaftor response likely reflects the severity of the functional defect and/or the 0 50 100 150 200 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L E56K P67L R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V Baseline With ivacaftor * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chloride transport (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form 0 100 200 300 400 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L P67L E56K R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mature CFTR (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form A B Fig. 2. Login to comment
82 Mutation Patientsa Chloride transport (bc;A/cm2 ) Chloride transport (% normal) EC50 Baseline With ivacaftor Baseline With ivacaftor Fold increase over baselineb Normal 204.5 &#b1; 33.3 301.3 &#b1; 33.8c 100.0 &#b1; 16.3 147.3 &#b1; 16.5c 1.5 266 &#b1; 42 G551D 1282 1.5 &#b1; 0.7 113.2 &#b1; 13.0c 1.0 &#b1; 0.5 55.3 &#b1; 6.3c 55.3 312 &#b1; 73 F1052V 12 177.3 &#b1; 13.7 410.2 &#b1; 11.3c 86.7 &#b1; 6.7 200.7 &#b1; 5.6c 2.3 177 &#b1; 14 S1235R ND 160.6 &#b1; 25.7 352.1 &#b1; 43.4c 78.5 &#b1; 12.6 172.2 &#b1; 21.2c 2.2 282 &#b1; 104 D1152H 185 117.3 &#b1; 23.0 282.7 &#b1; 46.9c 57.4 &#b1; 11.2 138.2 &#b1; 22.9c 2.4 178 &#b1; 67 D1270N 32 109.5 &#b1; 20.5 209.5 &#b1; 27.4c 53.6 &#b1; 10.0 102.4 &#b1; 13.4c 1.9 254 &#b1; 56 R668C 45 99.0 &#b1; 9.4 217.6 &#b1; 11.7c 48.4 &#b1; 4.6 106.4 &#b1; 5.7c 2.2 517 &#b1; 105 K1060T ND 89.0 &#b1; 9.8 236.4 &#b1; 20.3c 43.5 &#b1; 4.8 115.6 &#b1; 9.9c 2.7 131 &#b1; 73 R74W 25 86.8 &#b1; 26.9 199.1 &#b1; 16.8c 42.5 &#b1; 13.2 97.3 &#b1; 8.2c 2.3 162 &#b1; 17 R117H 739 67.2 &#b1; 13.3 274.1 &#b1; 32.2c 32.9 &#b1; 6.5 134.0 &#b1; 15.7c 4.1 151 &#b1; 14 E193K ND 62.2 &#b1; 9.8 379.1 &#b1; 1.1c 30.4 &#b1; 4.8 185.4 &#b1; 1.0c 6.1 240 &#b1; 20 A1067T ND 55.9 &#b1; 3.2 164.0 &#b1; 9.7c 27.3 &#b1; 1.6 80.2 &#b1; 4.7c 2.9 317 &#b1; 214 L997F 27 43.7 &#b1; 3.2 145.5 &#b1; 4.0c 21.4 &#b1; 1.6 71.2 &#b1; 2.0c 3.3 162 &#b1; 12 R1070Q 15 42.0 &#b1; 0.8 67.3 &#b1; 2.9c 20.6 &#b1; 0.4 32.9 &#b1; 1.4c 1.6 164 &#b1; 20 D110E ND 23.3 &#b1; 4.7 96.4 &#b1; 15.6c 11.4 &#b1; 2.3 47.1 &#b1; 7.6c 4.1 213 &#b1; 51 D579G 21 21.5 &#b1; 4.1 192.0 &#b1; 18.5c 10.5 &#b1; 2.0 93.9 &#b1; 9.0c 8.9 239 &#b1; 48 D110H 30 18.5 &#b1; 2.2 116.7 &#b1; 11.3c 9.1 &#b1; 1.1 57.1 &#b1; 5.5c 6.2 249 &#b1; 59 R1070W 13 16.6 &#b1; 2.6 102.1 &#b1; 3.1c 8.1 &#b1; 1.3 49.9 &#b1; 1.5c 6.2 158 &#b1; 48 P67L 53 16.0 &#b1; 6.7 88.7 &#b1; 15.7c 7.8 &#b1; 3.3 43.4 &#b1; 7.7c 5.6 195 &#b1; 40 E56K ND 15.8 &#b1; 3.1 63.6 &#b1; 4.4c 7.7 &#b1; 1.5 31.1 &#b1; 2.2c 4.0 123 &#b1; 33 F1074L ND 14.0 &#b1; 3.4 43.5 &#b1; 5.4c 6.9 &#b1; 1.6 21.3 &#b1; 2.6c 3.1 141 &#b1; 19 A455E 120 12.9 &#b1; 2.6 36.4 &#b1; 2.5c 6.3 &#b1; 1.2 17.8 &#b1; 1.2c 2.8 170 &#b1; 44 S945L 63 12.3 &#b1; 3.9 154.9 &#b1; 47.6c 6.0 &#b1; 1.9 75.8 &#b1; 23.3c 12.6 181 &#b1; 36 S977F 9 11.3 &#b1; 6.2 42.5 &#b1; 19.1c 5.5 &#b1; 3.0 20.8 &#b1; 9.3c 3.8 283 &#b1; 36 R347H 65 10.9 &#b1; 3.3 106.3 &#b1; 7.6c 5.3 &#b1; 1.6 52.0 &#b1; 3.7c 9.8 280 &#b1; 35 L206W 81 10.3 &#b1; 1.7 36.4 &#b1; 2.8c 5.0 &#b1; 0.8 17.8 &#b1; 1.4c 3.6 101 &#b1; 13 R117C 61 5.8 &#b1; 1.5 33.7 &#b1; 7.8c 2.9 &#b1; 0.7 16.5 &#b1; 3.8c 5.7 380 &#b1; 136 R352Q 46 5.5 &#b1; 1.0 84.5 &#b1; 7.8c 2.7 &#b1; 0.5 41.3 &#b1; 3.8c 15.2 287 &#b1; 75 R1066H 29 3.0 &#b1; 0.3 8.0 &#b1; 0.8c 1.5 &#b1; 0.1 3.9 &#b1; 0.4c 2.6 390 &#b1; 179 T338I 54 2.9 &#b1; 0.8 16.1 &#b1; 2.4c 1.4 &#b1; 0.4 7.9 &#b1; 1.2c 5.6 334 &#b1; 38 R334W 150 2.6 &#b1; 0.5 10.0 &#b1; 1.4c 1.3 &#b1; 0.2 4.9 &#b1; 0.7c 3.8 259 &#b1; 103 G85E 262 1.6 &#b1; 1.0 1.5 &#b1; 1.2 0.8 &#b1; 0.5 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS A46D ND 2.0 &#b1; 0.6 1.1 &#b1; 1.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS I336K 29 1.8 &#b1; 0.2 7.4 &#b1; 0.1c 0.9 &#b1; 0.1 3.6 &#b1; 0.1c 4 735 &#b1; 204 H1054D ND 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 8.7 &#b1; 0.3c 0.8 &#b1; 0.1 4.2 &#b1; 0.1c 5.3 187 &#b1; 20 F508del 29,018 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 12.1 &#b1; 1.7c 0.4 &#b1; 0.3 5.9 &#b1; 0.8c 14.8 129 &#b1; 38 M1V 9 0.7 &#b1; 1.4 6.5 &#b1; 1.9c 0.4 &#b1; 0.7 3.2 &#b1; 0.9c 8.0 183 &#b1; 85 E92K 14 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 4.3 &#b1; 0.8c 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 2.1 &#b1; 0.4c 7.0 198 &#b1; 46 V520F 58 0.4 &#b1; 0.2 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS H1085R ND 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 2.1 &#b1; 0.4 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS R560T 180 0.3 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.5 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS L927P 15 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 10.7 &#b1; 1.7c 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 5.2 &#b1; 0.8c 52.0 313 &#b1; 66 R560S ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 -0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 -0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS N1303K 1161 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS M1101K 79 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1077P 42 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066M ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066C 100 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1065P 25 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS Y569D 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS A561E ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS A559T 43 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S492F 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 1.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS L467P 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R347P 214 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S341P 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS a Number of individuals with the individual mutation in the CFTR-2 database (www.CFTR2.org). Login to comment
92 Mutant CFTR forms that did not significantly respond to ivacaftor under the experimental conditions used in this study were generally associated with severe defects in CFTR processing A B C D E F 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 S1235R D1152H F1052V D1270N ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 R668C K1060T R74W R117H ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 E193K A1067T L997F R1070Q ivacaftor [Log M] Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 D110E D579G D110H R1070W ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 F1074L E56K P67L A455E ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 R347H S945L L206W S977F ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -8 -6 -4 0 T338I R1066H R117C R352Q ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 F508del R334W H1054D E92K ivacaftor [Log M] 0 5 10 15 20 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 F508del R334W H1054D E92K R1066H T338I ivacaftor [Log M] G H I Fig. 3. Login to comment

PMID: 25190805 [PubMed] Wang W et al: "An electrostatic interaction at the tetrahelix bundle promotes phosphorylation-dependent cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel opening."

No. Sentence Comment

238 Seibert et al. (43) provided the first evidence that the K1060 position is relevant to CFTR gating in their single channel analysis of a mutation (K1060T) that reportedly associates with mild disease (i.e. CBAVD). Login to comment
254 This moderate degree of inhibition by the uncharged K1060T substitution is consistent with our findings. Login to comment

PMID: 26209275 [PubMed] Cui G et al: "Murine and human CFTR exhibit different sensitivities to CFTR potentiators."

No. Sentence Comment

306 However, recent data indicating that VX-770 potentiates channels bearing multiple disease-causing mutations, spread across CFTR, and that VX-770 potentiates one mutant but not another one in the same domain (for example, VX-770 potentiated TM mutants T338I- and R347H- but not S341P- and E92K-CFTR and potentiated cytoplasmic loop mutants E193K- and K1060T- but not R1066M- and L1065P-CFTR) do not support this conclusion (30, 38). Login to comment