PMID: 25732853

Sharpe LJ, Rao G, Jones PM, Glancey E, Aleidi SM, George AM, Brown AJ, Gelissen IC
Cholesterol sensing by the ABCG1 lipid transporter: Requirement of a CRAC motif in the final transmembrane domain.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Jul;1851(7):956-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Feb 27., [PubMed]
Sentences
No. Mutations Sentence Comment
107 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:107:94
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Cholesterol docking studies were performed for the Y667 containing CRAC motifs as well as the Y667L ABCG1 mutant. Login to comment
109 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:109:70
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Y667 in this model was replaced by leucine to simulate effects of the Y667L mutation on the interaction between this ABCG1 CRAC motif and cholesterol. Login to comment
147 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:147:37
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu 25732853:147:30
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu 25732853:147:47
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu details
Individual point mutations of Y649L, Y667L and Y672L were introduced into ABCG1 and stable cell lines overexpressing the individual mutants generated. Login to comment
148 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:148:54
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu 25732853:148:44
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu 25732853:148:101
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu details
Fig. 3A shows that the activity of both the Y649L and Y667L mutants was totally abolished, while the Y672L mutant had reduced cholesterol export activity (this latter difference was not statistically significant). Login to comment
149 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:149:98
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Upon investigation of the protein stability in response to cholesterol starvation/enrichment, the Y667L mutant ABCG1 protein was not stabilised by addition of cholesterol (Fig. 3B). Login to comment
150 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:150:55
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Some experiments suggested that the degradation of the Y667L mutant upon starvation was more pronounced than the wild type, however this was not consistent. Login to comment
151 ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu 25732853:151:4
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu 25732853:151:14
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu details
The Y649L and Y672L mutant proteins however, were consistently stabilised by the addition of cholesterol, suggesting that their cholesterol "sensing" ability was still intact, despite having reduced or negligible cholesterol export capacity. Login to comment
153 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:153:0
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Y667L is degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasomal system As mentioned, we showed previously that ABCG1 is ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome when cholesterol levels drop in the cell [5]. Login to comment
154 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:154:49
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Investigation of the route of degradation of the Y667L mutant showed that this protein was also degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasomal system as was previously shown for the wild type ABCG1 (Fig. 3C). Login to comment
155 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:155:154
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Overexposure of the Western blot after incubation with a proteasomal inhibitor (MG132) revealed a laddering and smearing pattern, which may indicate that Y667L protein is also ubiquitinated (Fig. 3C). Login to comment
156 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:156:90
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Addition of lysosomal inhibitors, chloroquine and ammonium chloride, did not increase the Y667L protein levels, indicating that this pathway of degradation was not quantitatively important. Login to comment
158 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:158:54
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Staining patterns were the same for the wild type and Y667L mutant, displaying a largely perinuclear distribution, which is identical to what we have shown previously for these cells (Supplementary Fig. 5; [12]). Login to comment
163 ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu 25732853:163:25
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu details
This may explain why the Y649L mutation inhibited the cholesterol transport activity of ABCG1 without affecting its stabilisation by cholesterol. Login to comment
174 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:174:163
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu 25732853:174:156
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu 25732853:174:173
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu details
2A) Cholesterol export of parental CHOK1 cells (CHOK1), CHOK1 cells overexpressing wild-type ABCG1 (ABCG1), or two independent clones overexpressing triple Y649L, Y667L and Y672L mutants (Triple Y/L). Login to comment
181 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:181:51
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
In view of the above, and the marked effect of the Y667L mutation on both cholesterol-mediated rescue of ABCG1, as well as cholesterol efflux, we aimed to investigate the interaction of cholesterol with the Y667 CARC motif, by docking a cholesterol molecule to the structural homology model of the area containing residues F652 to R678. Login to comment
193 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:193:30
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:193:64
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:193:236
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Docking of cholesterol to the Y667L mutant Considering that the Y667L mutant had no transport capacity and had lost its cholesterol-mediated stability, we performed an identical simulation by docking cholesterol to this mutant (Fig. 5; Y667L). Login to comment
203 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:203:90
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu 25732853:203:83
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu 25732853:203:99
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu details
3A) Cholesterol export of CHOK1 cells overexpressing ABCG1 with a single mutation (Y649L, Y667L or Y672L). Login to comment
205 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:205:158
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu 25732853:205:148
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr649Leu details
Statistically significant differences in HDL-mediated export (via 2-way ANOVA; p b 0.05) are indicated between cells overexpressing ABCG1 vs CHOK1, Y649L and Y667L mutants. Login to comment
206 ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu 25732853:206:29
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr672Leu details
Differences between ABCG1 vs Y672L were non-significant (N.S.). Login to comment
211 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:211:21
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
3C) Left side: ABCG1 Y667L protein levels at T = 0 or after 8 h of treatment with BSA alone (0.1% in F12 media) or with addition of MG132 (20 bc;M), ammonium chloride (20 bc;'c;) or chloroquine (CQ, 200 bc;M). Login to comment
225 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:225:51
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Time course of ligand binding to the wild type and Y667L mutant ABCG1 TM6 area. Login to comment
231 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:231:1
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:231:8
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
(Y667L) Y667L mutant. Login to comment
239 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:239:65
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
This model was further supported by an identical analysis of the Y667L mutant, where the binding locus of the cholesterol was altered due to the changed position of the R671 side chain. Login to comment
251 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:251:45
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
In addition to rendering ABCG1 inactive, the Y667L mutation also altered the post-translational regulation of the transporter protein by cholesterol. Login to comment
253 ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu
X
ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu 25732853:253:21
status: NEW
view ABCG1 p.Tyr667Leu details
Considering that the Y667L protein was not stabilised by addition of cholesterol, this implies that binding of cholesterol to this site is necessary for "rescue" from degradation to occur. Login to comment