ABCC7 p.Leu32Met
| ClinVar: |
c.95T>C
,
p.Leu32Pro
?
, not provided
|
| CF databases: |
c.95T>C
,
p.Leu32Pro
(CFTR1)
?
, Name in accordance with the standard nomenclature guidelines (HGVS): c.95T>C
|
| Predicted by SNAP2: | A: D (66%), C: D (53%), D: D (85%), E: D (80%), F: D (63%), G: D (85%), H: D (75%), I: N (66%), K: D (80%), M: N (66%), N: D (80%), P: D (85%), Q: D (71%), R: D (80%), S: D (75%), T: D (71%), V: N (57%), W: D (75%), Y: D (71%), |
| Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: N, K: D, M: N, N: D, P: D, Q: D, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Novel CFTR variants identified during the first 3 ... J Mol Diagn. 2013 Sep;15(5):710-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Prach L, Koepke R, Kharrazi M, Keiles S, Salinas DB, Reyes MC, Pian M, Opsimos H, Otsuka KN, Hardy KA, Milla CE, Zirbes JM, Chipps B, O'Bra S, Saeed MM, Sudhakar R, Lehto S, Nielson D, Shay GF, Seastrand M, Jhawar S, Nickerson B, Landon C, Thompson A, Nussbaum E, Chin T, Wojtczak H
Novel CFTR variants identified during the first 3 years of cystic fibrosis newborn screening in California.
J Mol Diagn. 2013 Sep;15(5):710-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jun 28., [PMID:23810505]
Abstract [show]
California uses a unique method to screen newborns for cystic fibrosis (CF) that includes gene scanning and DNA sequencing after only one California-40 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) panel mutation has been identified in hypertrypsinogenemic specimens. Newborns found by sequencing to have one or more additional mutations or variants (including novel variants) in the CFTR gene are systematically followed, allowing for prospective assessment of the pathogenic potential of these variants. During the first 3 years of screening, 55 novel variants were identified. Six of these novel variants were discovered in five screen-negative participants and three were identified in multiple unrelated participants. Ten novel variants (c.2554_2555insT, p.F1107L, c.-152G>C, p.L323P, p.L32M, c.2883_2886dupGTCA, c.2349_2350insT, p.K114del, c.-602A>T, and c.2822delT) were associated with a CF phenotype (42% of participants were diagnosed at 4 to 25 months of age), whereas 26 were associated with CFTR-related metabolic syndrome to date. Associations with the remaining novel variants were confounded by the presence of other diseases or other mutations in cis or by inadequate follow-up. These findings have implications for how CF newborn screening and follow-up is conducted and will help guide which genotypes should, and which should not, be considered screen positive for CF in California and elsewhere.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
8 Ten novel variants (c.2554_2555insT, p.F1107L, c.-152G>C, p.L323P, p.L32M, c.2883_2886dupGTCA, c.2349_2350insT, p.K114del, c.-602A>T, and c.2822delT) were associated with a CF phenotype (42% of participants were diagnosed at 4 to 25 months of age), whereas 26 were associated with CFTR-related metabolic syndrome to date.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu32Met 23810505:8:69
status: NEW56 Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification12 (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was used to determine gross deletions or duplications when CF was suspected but no or one CFTR mutations were detected by Table 1 Description of Novel CFTR Variants Identified in California, July 16, 2007, to July 15, 2010 CFTR region Nucleotide change Predicted amino acid change Type of mutation Promoter c.-983A>T Promoter c.-967T>C Promoter c.-837T>C Promoter c.-769A>G Promoter c.-730A>G Promoter c.-684G>A Promoter c.-635A>G Promoter c.-602A>T Promoter c.-510G>A Promoter c.-448A>G Promoter c.-288G>C Promoter c.-152G>C Exon 1 c.38C>G p.S13C Missense Exon 2 c.94C>A p.L32M Missense Intron 2 c.164 &#fe; 4T>A Exon 3 c.226T>C p.C76R Missense Exon 4 c.335A>G p.D112G Missense Exon 4 c.407T>C p.L136P Missense Exon 4 c.472_474delAAG p.K114del In-frame deletion Intron 6 c.744-15T>C Exon 7 c.745G>T p.D249Y Missense Intron 7 c.869 &#fe; 8G>T Exon 8 c.944T>C p.F315S Missense Exon 8 c.968T>C p.L323P Missense Exon 8 c.974A>G p.Y325C Missense Exon 8 c.1064C>T p.P355Ly Missense Exon 10 c.1278delC p.D426Efs*16 (stop codon at 441) Frameshift Exon 11 c.1479G>C p.Q493Hy Missense Exon 14 c.1885A>G p.T629A Missense Exon 14 c.2153C>G p.P718R Missense Exon 14 c.2433G>T p.R811S Missense Exon 14 c.2349_2350insT p.H784Sfs*21 (stop codon at 804) Frameshift Intron 13 c.1767-13T>G Intron 14 c.2490 &#fe; 14G>A Intron 14 c.2490 &#fe; 14G>T Exon 15 c.2554_2555insT p.Y852Lfs*44 (stop codon at 895) Frameshift Exon 15 c.2510T>C p.M837T Missense Exon 17 c.2659A>C p.T887P Missense Exon 17 c.2883_2886dupGTCA p.T963Vfs*13 (stop codon at 975) Frameshift Exon 17 c.2822delT p.L941Qfs*27 (stop codon at 967) Frameshift Exon 19 c.3064G>A p.V1022M Missense Exon 20 c.3319T>C p.F1107L Missense Intron 20 c.3367 &#fe; 3A>Cy Exon 21 c.3382A>G p.R1128G Missense Exon 21 c.3418A>T p.M1140L Missense Exon 22 c.3517G>A p.G1173S Missense Exon 22 c.3592G>A p.V1198M Missense Intron 22 c.3718-24G>A Intron 23 c.3963 &#fe; 6G>T Exon 25 c.3964G>C p.V1322L Missense Exon 25 c.4123C>A p.H1375N Missense Intron 25 c.4136 &#fe; 12A>G Exon 26 c.4186A>C p.T1396P Missense Intron 26 c.4243-5C>T Exon 27 c.4433C>G p.T1478R Missense y A known mutation occurs at the same nucleotide position or codon.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu32Met 23810505:56:668
status: NEW59 of parents receiving CFTR mutation testing Diagnosis/ status Study participants with positive NBS results 1 W, H 83.5 p.F508del* c.2554_2555insTy 7T/9T 2 CF 2 H 527.0 p.F508del c.-877C>T p.F1107L 7T/9T 0 CF 3 W 86.5 p.F508del p.V562Iy c.-837T>Cy 5Tyz /9T 1 CF 4 H 222.3 p.F508del p.I556V c.1278delC NA 0 CF 5 H, O 93.5 p.F508del* c.-152G>Cy 7T/9T 2 CF 6 W, H, B, O 95.4 p.F508del* p.L323Py 5Tyz /9T 2 CF 7 H 70.5 p.F508del p.L32M 7T/9T 0 CF 8 W 209.5 p.F508del c.2883_2886dupGTCA 9T/9T 0 CF 9 H 155.7 p.F508del* c.2349_2350insT 7T/9T 1 CF 10 O 146.8 p.F508del* c.3718-24G>Ay 5Tyx /9T 2 CF 11 B 99.4 p.A559T* p.L206Wy c.-448A>G* 7T/9T 2 CF 12 W, H 90.3 p.P205S p.K114del 7T/7T 0 CF 13 H 69.7 p.P205S p.K114del 7T/7T 0 CF 14 H 82.9 c.274-1G>A* c.-602A>Ty 7T/7T 2 CF 15 W 106.6 p.F508del* c.-461A>Gy c.-983A>T* 7T/9T 2 CRMS 16 W, B 83.9 p.F508del c.4243-5C>T 5T*x /9T 1 CRMS 17 W 81.5 p.F508del* p.I1027T* p.Y325C 7T/9T 2 CRMS 18 H 70.7 p.F508del c.-967T>C 9T/9T 0 CRMS 19 W, H 62.4 p.F508del* c.-635A>G 7T/9T 1 CRMS 20 H 65.4 p.F508dely c.2490 &#fe; 14G>T* 7T/9T 2 CRMS 21 W 69.3 p.F508del* c.744-15T>Cy 7T/9T 2 CRMS 22 W, H, O 66.2 p.F508del p.D249Y 7T/9T 0 CRMS 23 H 94.8 p.F508del p.R811S 7T/9T 0 CRMS 24 W 75.8 p.F508del* p.H1375Ny 7T/9T 2 CRMS 25 H 63.0 p.F508del p.L136P 7T/9T 0 CRMS 26 W, O 63.0 p.F508del* p.M1140L 7T/9T 1 CRMS 27 W, O 91.7 p.F508del p.V1198M 9T/9T 0 CRMS 28 H 69.3 p.F508dely c.1767-13T>G* 7T/9T 2 CRMS 29 H 108.8 p.F508del p.V1322L 7T/9T 0 CRMS 30 H 96.4 p.F508dely p.C76R* 7T/9T 2 CRMS 31 H 69.0 c.3140-26A>G c.-510G>A* 7T/7T 1 CRMS 32 H 100.2 p.G542X c.-684G>A* 7T/9T 1 CRMS 33 H 84.1 c.1153_1154insAT* c.-730A>Gy 7T/7T 2 CRMS 34 H 62.9 c.1973_ 1985del13insAGAAA* p.D112Gy 7T/7T 2 CRMS 35 H 116.7 c.3744delA* p.T887P 7T/7T 1 CRMS 36 B 73.3 c.2988 &#fe; 1G>A c.-288G>C 7T/9T 0 CRMS 37 H 93.5 p.R75X c.3367 &#fe; 3A>C 7T/7T 0 CRMS 38 W, H 81.4 c.3717 &#fe; 12191C>T* c.-769A>Gy 7T/7T 2 CRMS 39 W 79.0 c.3717 &#fe; 12191C>Ty p.R668Cy p.T1396P* 7T/9T 2 CRMS 40 H 87.3 c.274-1G>A p.F315S 7T/7T 0 CRMS 41 H 79.7 p.G542X c.869 &#fe; 8G>T 7T/9T 0 CRMS 42 O 79.8 p.R553X p.T1478R 7T/7T 0 CRMS 43 H 70.5 p.A559T* c.-448A>G* 7T/7T 2 Carrier 44 B 76.2 p.A559T* c.-448A>G* 7T/7T 1 Carrier 45 W, H 69.2 p.G85E* c.744-15T>C* 5Tyz /7T 2 Carrier 46 W 69.1 p.N1303K* c.2490 &#fe; 14G>A* 7T/9T 1 Carrier 47 W, O 111.7 p.F508del c.3963 &#fe; 6G>T 7T/9T 0 ND{ 48 W 80.1 p.F508del p.R1128G 7T/9T 0 ND{ (table continues) sequencing.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu32Met 23810505:59:425
status: NEW129 p.L32M Participant 7 has a novel variant p.L32M and p.F508del; no other mutations or variants were identified, although gross duplications or deletions could not be ruled out because multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis was not conducted.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu32Met 23810505:129:2
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Leu32Met 23810505:129:43
status: NEW[hide] Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Californi... Pediatrics. 2015 Dec;136(6):1062-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0811. Epub 2015 Nov 16. Kharrazi M, Yang J, Bishop T, Lessing S, Young S, Graham S, Pearl M, Chow H, Ho T, Currier R, Gaffney L, Feuchtbaum L
Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in California.
Pediatrics. 2015 Dec;136(6):1062-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0811. Epub 2015 Nov 16., [PMID:26574590]
Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVES: This article describes the methods used and the program performance results for the first 5 years of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) in California. METHODS: From July 16, 2007, to June 30, 2012, a total of 2 573 293 newborns were screened for CF by using a 3-step model: (1) measuring immunoreactive trypsinogen in all dried blood spot specimens; (2) testing 28 to 40 selected cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations in specimens with immunoreactive trypsinogen values >/=62 ng/mL (top 1.6%); and (3) performing DNA sequencing on specimens found to have only 1 mutation in step 2. Infants with >/=2 mutations/variants were referred to CF care centers for diagnostic evaluation and follow-up. Infants with 1 mutation were considered carriers and their parents offered telephone genetic counseling. RESULTS: Overall, 345 CF cases, 533 CFTR-related metabolic syndrome cases, and 1617 carriers were detected; 28 cases of CF were missed. Of the 345 CF cases, 20 (5.8%) infants were initially assessed as having CFTR-related metabolic syndrome, and their CF diagnosis occurred after age 6 months (median follow-up: 4.5 years). Program sensitivity was 92%, and the positive predictive value was 34%. CF prevalence was 1 in 6899 births. A total of 303 CFTR mutations were identified, including 78 novel variants. The median age at referral to a CF care center was 34 days (18 and 37 days for step 2 and 3 screening test-positive infants, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The 3-step model had high detection and low false-positive levels in this diverse population.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
107 [1210-12[5]];[1210-34TG[13]] (IVS8 (TG)13-5T)c 1 1 c.2988+1G.A (3120+1G.A) / c.164+28A.G (296+28A.G)e 1 1d c.1521_1523delCTT (F508del) / c.226C.A (L32M)e 1 2 c.1521_1523delCTT (F508del) / c.3475T.C (S1159P)e 1 2 c.933_935delCTT (delF311)e / c.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu32Met 26574590:107:147
status: NEW