ABCC7 p.Glu193*
| ClinVar: |
c.577G>T
,
p.Glu193*
D
, Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic, not provided
c.577G>A , p.Glu193Lys ? , not provided |
| CF databases: |
c.577G>T
,
p.Glu193*
D
, CF-causing
c.577G>A , p.Glu193Lys (CFTR1) ? , This missense mutation has been detected in an Italian CF patient through DGGE and direct sequencing. This mutation has been detected in a PS patient (maternal chromosome), associated with haplotype C; the paternal chromosome carries the [delta]F508 mutation. This mutation was found in onw out of 29 non-[delta]F508 Italian CF chromosomes and was not found in 11 normal chromosomes. |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulato... J Cyst Fibros. 2012 Sep;11(5):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 2. Ooi CY, Durie PR
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations in pancreatitis.
J Cyst Fibros. 2012 Sep;11(5):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 2., [PMID:22658665]
Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: The pancreas is one of the primary organs affected by dysfunction of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. While exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is a well-recognized complication of cystic fibrosis (CF), symptomatic pancreatitis is often under-recognized. RESULTS: The aim of this review is to provide a general overview of CFTR mutation-associated pancreatitis, which affects patients with pancreatic sufficient CF, CFTR-related pancreatitis, and idiopathic pancreatitis. The current hypothesis regarding the role of CFTR dysfunction in the pathogenesis of pancreatitis, and concepts on genotype-phenotype correlations between CFTR and symptomatic pancreatitis will be reviewed. Symptomatic pancreatitis occurs in 20% of pancreatic sufficient CF patients. In order to evaluate genotype-phenotype correlations, the Pancreatic Insufficiency Prevalence (PIP) score was developed and validated to determine severity in a large number of CFTR mutations. Specific CFTR genotypes are significantly associated with pancreatitis. Patients who carry genotypes with mild phenotypic effects have a greater risk of developing pancreatitis than patients carrying genotypes with moderate-severe phenotypic consequences at any given time. CONCLUSIONS: The genotype-phenotype correlation in pancreatitis is unique compared to other organ manifestations but still consistent with the complex monogenic nature of CF. Paradoxically, genotypes associated with otherwise mild phenotypic effects have a greater risk for causing pancreatitis; compared with genotypes associated with moderate to severe disease phenotypes. Greater understanding into the underlying mechanisms of disease is much needed. The emergence of CFTR-assist therapies may potentially play a future role in the treatment of CFTR-mutation associated pancreatitis.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
855 CFTR mutation Total PI Total PI + PS PIP score CFTR mutation Total PI Total PI + PS PIP score 621+1G>T 96 96 1.00 G542X 74 75 0.99 711+1G>T 36 36 1.00 F508del 1276 1324 0.96 I507del 34 34 1.00 1717-1G>A 20 21 0.95 R553X 24 24 1.00 W1282X 19 20 0.95 Q493X 11 11 1.00 N1303K 45 48 0.94 S489X 11 11 1.00 R1162X 12 13 0.92 1154insTC 10 10 1.00 Y1092X 12 13 0.92 3659delC 9 9 1.00 I148T 10 11 0.91 CFTRdele2 7 7 1.00 V520F 9 10 0.90 4016insT 7 7 1.00 G551D 59 67 0.88 E60X 7 7 1.00 L1077P 5 6 0.83 R560T 7 7 1.00 R1066C 5 6 0.83 R1158X 7 7 1.00 2184insA 9 12 0.75 3905insT 6 6 1.00 2143delT 3 4 0.75 I148T;3199del6 5 5 1.00 1161delC 3 4 0.75 2183AA>G 5 5 1.00 3120+1G>A 3 4 0.75 1898+1G>A 5 5 1.00 S549N 3 4 0.75 2347delG 4 4 1.00 G85E 16 22 0.73 Q1313X 3 3 1.00 R117C 2 3 0.67 Q220X 3 3 1.00 M1101K 19 30 0.63 2184delA 3 3 1.00 P574H 3 5 0.60 1078delT 3 3 1.00 474del13BP 1 2 0.50 L1254X 3 3 1.00 R352Q 1 2 0.50 E585X 3 3 1.00 Q1291H 1 2 0.50 3876delA 2 2 1.00 A455E 18 37 0.49 S4X 2 2 1.00 R347P 6 15 0.40 R1070Q 2 2 1.00 2789+5G>A 6 16 0.38 F508C 2 2 1.00 L206W 6 18 0.33 DELI507 2 2 1.00 IVS8-5T 4 16 0.25 Q1411X 2 2 1.00 3272-26A>G 1 4 0.25 365-366insT 2 2 1.00 R334W 1 10 0.10 R709X 2 2 1.00 3849+10kbC>T 2 22 0.09 1138insG 2 2 1.00 P67L 1 14 0.07 CFTRdele2-4 2 2 1.00 R117H 1 25 0.04 3007delG 2 2 1.00 R347H 0 5 0.00 Q814X 2 2 1.00 G178R 0 3 0.00 394delTT 2 2 1.00 E116K 0 2 0.00 406-1G>A 2 2 1.00 875+1G>C 0 2 0.00 R75X 2 2 1.00 V232D 0 2 0.00 CFTRdel2-3 2 2 1.00 D579G 0 2 0.00 E193X 2 2 1.00 L1335P 0 2 0.00 185+1G>T 2 2 1.00 Mild mutations (based on PIP scores) are shaded in gray.
X
ABCC7 p.Glu193* 22658665:855:1482
status: NEW[hide] Extensive molecular analysis of patients bearing C... J Mol Diagn. 2012 Jan;14(1):81-9. Epub 2011 Oct 20. Amato F, Bellia C, Cardillo G, Castaldo G, Ciaccio M, Elce A, Lembo F, Tomaiuolo R
Extensive molecular analysis of patients bearing CFTR-related disorders.
J Mol Diagn. 2012 Jan;14(1):81-9. Epub 2011 Oct 20., [PMID:22020151]
Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-related disorders (CFTR-RDs) may present with pancreatic sufficiency, normal sweat test results, and better outcome. The detection rate of mutations is lower in CFTR-RD than in classic CF: mutations may be located in genes encoding proteins that interact with CFTR or support channel activity. We tested the whole CFTR coding regions in 99 CFTR-RD patients, looking for gene mutations in solute carrier (SLC) 26A and in epithelial Na channel (ENaC) in 33 patients who had unidentified mutations. CFTR analysis revealed 28 mutations, some of which are rare. Of these mutations, RT-PCR demonstrated that the novel 1525-1delG impairs exon 10 splicing; by using minigene analysis, we excluded the splicing effect of three other novel intronic variants. Analysis of SLC26A genes revealed several variants, some of which are novel, that did not affect mRNA expression. Other mutations occurred in the ENaC genes encoding the ENaC subunits, but their frequency did not significantly differ between patients and controls. Our data, although obtained on a preliminary cohort of CFTR-RD patients, exclude a role of mutations in SLC26A and in SCNN genes in the pathogenesis of such disease; we confirm that CFTR analysis has a relevant role in CFTR-RD patients; and it appears mandatory to use CFTR scanning techniques and approaches to reveal the effect of novel mutations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
69 Allele Frequency and CFTR Mutations in Patients Bearing CFTR-RDs Mutation (traditional name) HGVS nomenclature15 CBAVD (118 alleles)* RP (42 alleles)* DB (38 alleles)* Total (198 alleles)* TG12-T5-470V 34 (28.8) 2 (4.8) 10 (26.3) 46 (23.2) F508del c.1521_1523del 19 (16.1) 7 (16.7) 4 (10.5) 30 (15.2) 3195del6 c.3063_3069del 9 (7.6) 0 0 9 (4.5) N1303K c.3909CϾG 3 (2.5) 1 (2.4) 4 (10.5) 8 (4.0) G542X c.1624GϾT 4 (3.4) 1 (2.4) 1 (2.6) 6 (3.0) D1152H c.3454GϾC 1 (0.8) 2 (4.8) 2 (5.3) 5 (2.5) G85E c.254GϾA 2 (1.7) 3 (7.1) 0 5 (2.5) 1525-1delG c.1394de 3 (2.5) 1 (2.4) 0 4 (3.0) 4016insT c.3885insT 2 (1.7) 1 (2.4) 0 3 (1.5) 2789ϩ5GϾA c.2657ϩ5GϾA 0 3 (7.1) 0 3 (1.5) Q1476X c.4426CϾT 3 (2.5) 0 0 3 (1.5) 2183AAϾG c.2051_2052delinsG 1 (0.8) 1 (2.4) 0 2 (1.0) R553X c.1657CϾT 1 (0.8) 1 (2.4) 0 2 (1.0) L568F c.1704GϾT 2 (1.7) 0 0 2 (1.0) R1158X c.3472CϾT 2 (1.7) 0 0 2 (1.0) V920M c.2758GϾA 1 (0.8) 0 1 (2.6) 2 (1.0) 711ϩ1GϾT c.579ϩ1GϾT 0 1 (2.4) 0 1 (0.5) D614G c.1841AϾG 1 (0.8) 0 0 1 (0.5) 2184insA c.2052del 0 1 (2.4) 0 1 (0.5) 621ϩ1GϾT c.489ϩ1GϾT 1 (0.8) 0 0 1 (0.5) R1438W c.4312CϾT 0 1 (2.4) 0 1 (0.5) E193X c.577GϾT 0 1 (2.4) 0 1 (0.5) G1244E c.3731GϾA 1 (0.8) 0 0 1 (0.5) K68E c.202AϾG 1 (0.8) 0 0 1 (0.5) R347P c.1040GϾC 1 (0.8) 0 0 1 (0.5) 621ϩ3AϾG c.489ϩ3AϾG 1 (0.8) 0 0 1 (0.5) L997F c.2991GϾC 0 1 (2.4) 0 1 (0.5) F508C c.1523TϾG 1 (0.8) 0 0 1 (0.5) Total 94 (79.7) 28 (66.7) 22 (57.9) 144 (72.7) Undetected 24 (20.3) 14 (33.3) 16 (42.1) 54 (27.3) *Data are given as number (percentage).
X
ABCC7 p.Glu193* 22020151:69:1250
status: NEW144 This detection rate is higher than that reported for other patients affected by CBAVD,20 RP,21-24 or DB.25-28 Most previous studies tested restricted mutation panels for first-level analysis, whereas we used sequencing analysis, and 11 mutations identified in our study (3195del6, Q1476X, L568F, V920M, 1525-1delG, D614G, R1438W, E193X, K68E, 621ϩ3AϾG, and L997F), present in approximately 13% of chromosomes of CFTR-RD patients, are not included in most mutation panels.
X
ABCC7 p.Glu193* 22020151:144:330
status: NEW[hide] Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and ... Hum Mutat. 2000;16(2):143-56. Claustres M, Guittard C, Bozon D, Chevalier F, Verlingue C, Ferec C, Girodon E, Cazeneuve C, Bienvenu T, Lalau G, Dumur V, Feldmann D, Bieth E, Blayau M, Clavel C, Creveaux I, Malinge MC, Monnier N, Malzac P, Mittre H, Chomel JC, Bonnefont JP, Iron A, Chery M, Georges MD
Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and in congenital absence of the vas deferens in France.
Hum Mutat. 2000;16(2):143-56., [PMID:10923036]
Abstract [show]
We have collated the results of cystic fibrosis (CF) mutation analysis conducted in 19 laboratories in France. We have analyzed 7, 420 CF alleles, demonstrating a total of 310 different mutations including 24 not reported previously, accounting for 93.56% of CF genes. The most common were F508del (67.18%; range 61-80), G542X (2.86%; range 1-6.7%), N1303K (2.10%; range 0.75-4.6%), and 1717-1G>A (1.31%; range 0-2.8%). Only 11 mutations had relative frequencies >0. 4%, 140 mutations were found on a small number of CF alleles (from 29 to two), and 154 were unique. These data show a clear geographical and/or ethnic variation in the distribution of the most common CF mutations. This spectrum of CF mutations, the largest ever reported in one country, has generated 481 different genotypes. We also investigated a cohort of 800 French men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and identified a total of 137 different CFTR mutations. Screening for the most common CF defects in addition to assessment for IVS8-5T allowed us to detect two mutations in 47.63% and one in 24.63% of CBAVD patients. In a subset of 327 CBAVD men who were more extensively investigated through the scanning of coding/flanking sequences, 516 of 654 (78. 90%) alleles were identified, with 15.90% and 70.95% of patients carrying one or two mutations, respectively, and only 13.15% without any detectable CFTR abnormality. The distribution of genotypes, classified according to the expected effect of their mutations on CFTR protein, clearly differed between both populations. CF patients had two severe mutations (87.77%) or one severe and one mild/variable mutation (11.33%), whereas CBAVD men had either a severe and a mild/variable (87.89%) or two mild/variable (11.57%) mutations.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
109 h M1K, K14X, W19X, 211delG, G27E, R31C, 237insA, 241delAT, Q39X, 244delTA, 296+2T>C, 297-3C>T, W57X+F87L, 306delTAGA, P67L, A72D, 347delC, R75Q, 359insT, 394delT, 405+4A>G, Q98R, 457TAT>G, R117H+5T, R117H+I1027T, R117L, R117P, H139R, A141D, M152V, N186K, D192N, D192del, E193X, 711+1G>A, 711+3A>G, 712-1G>T, L206F, W216X, C225R, Q237E, G241R, 852del22, 876-14del12, 905delG, 993del5, E292K, Y304X, F311del, 1161delC, R347L, R352Q, W361R, 1215delG, S364P, S434X, D443Y, S466X, C491R, T501A, I506T, F508C, I507del+F508C, F508del+L467F, 1774delCT, R553G, 1802delC, 1806delA, A559E, Y563N, 1833delT, Y569C, Y569H, Y569X, G576X, G576A, T582I, 1898+3A>G+186-13C>G, 1918delGC, R600G, L610S, G628R, 2043delG, 2118del4, E664X, 2174insA, Q689X, K698R, K716X, L732X, 2347delG, 2372del8, R764X, 2423delG, S776X, 2634insT, 2640delT, C866Y, 2752-1G>T, W882X, Y913C, V920M, 2896insAG, H939D, H939R, D979V, D985H, D993Y, 3120G>A, I1005R, 3195del6, 3293delA, 3320ins5, W1063X, A1067T, 3359delCT, T1086I, W1089X, Y1092X+S1235R, W1098X, E1104X, R1128X, 3532AC>GTA, 3548TCAT>G, M1140del, 3600G>A, R1162L, 3667ins4, 3732delA+K1200E, S1206X, 3791delC, S1235R+5T, Q1238R, Q1238X, 3849+4A>G, T1246I, 3869insG, S1255P, R1283K, F1286S, 4005+1G>T, 4006-8T>A, 4015delA, N1303H, N1303I, 4172delGC, 4218insT, 4326delTC, Q1382X, 4375-1C>T, 4382delA, D1445N, CF40kbdel4-10, Cfdel17b.
X
ABCC7 p.Glu193* 10923036:109:271
status: NEW