ABCA4 p.Arg408*
| ClinVar: |
c.1222C>T
,
p.Arg408*
D
, Pathogenic
|
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Visual function in patients with cone-rod dystroph... Exp Eye Res. 2001 Dec;73(6):877-86. Birch DG, Peters AY, Locke KL, Spencer R, Megarity CF, Travis GH
Visual function in patients with cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) associated with mutations in the ABCA4(ABCR) gene.
Exp Eye Res. 2001 Dec;73(6):877-86., [PMID:11846518]
Abstract [show]
Mutations in the ABCA4(ABCR) gene cause autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (STGD). ABCR mutations were identified in patients with cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP) by direct sequencing of all 50 exons in 40 patients. Of 10 patients with RP, one contained two ABCR mutations suggesting a compound heterozygote. This patient had a characteristic fundus appearance with attenuated vessels, pale disks and bone-spicule pigmentation. Rod electroretinograms (ERGs) were non-detectable, cone ERGs were greatly reduced in amplitude and delayed in implicit time, and visual fields were constricted to 10 degrees diameter. Eleven of 30 (37%) patients with CRD had mutations in ABCR. In general, these patients showed reduced but detectable rod ERG responses, reduced and delayed cone responses, and poor visual acuity. Rod photoresponses to high intensity flashes were of reduced maximum amplitude but showed normal values for the gain of phototransduction. Most CRD patients with mutations in ABCR showed delayed recovery of sensitivity (dark adaptation) following exposure to bright light. Pupils were also significantly smaller in these patients compared to controls at 30 min following light exposure, consistent with a persistent 'equivalent light' background due to the accumulation of a tentatively identified 'noisy' photoproduct.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
207 In contrast, the ®t of the T ABLE III ABCR mutations in patients with ARRP and CRD hRmP exon # Base variation site Codon variation site # WT with mutation New mutation WT genotype RP CRD 3195 3424 5402 5398 4317 146 3793 2566 4800 4512 5581 4770 3 3 H Jxn 1 3 H Jxn 0 in 53 Yes G/G G/A 3 G161A C054Y 0 in 53 No G/G A/A G/A 6 C618G S206R 0 in 53 No C/C C/G 6 G574A A192T 0 in 53 No G/G G/A 9 C1222T R408stop 0 in 53 No C/C C/T 18 A2701G T901A 0 in 53 No A/A A/G 19 A2894G N965S 0 in 53 No A/A A/G 28 T4169C L1390P 0 in 53 Yes T/T T/C 33 3 H Jxn 2 3 H Jxn 0 in 53 Yes T/T T/C 35 C4926G S1642R 0 in 53 Yes C/C C/G 36 G5115T R1705L 0 in 53 No G/G G/T 36 deletion deletion 0 in 53 Yes no del deln 37 T5206C S1736P 0 in 53 No T/T T/C 42 G5882A G1961E 0 in 53 No G/G A/G 47 G6449A C2150Y 0 in 53 No G/G G/A phototransduction model to the cone a-waves revealed a reduction in gain of approximately 0.5 log unit.
X
ABCA4 p.Arg408* 11846518:207:410
status: NEW[hide] ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570. Fujinami K, Zernant J, Chana RK, Wright GA, Tsunoda K, Ozawa Y, Tsubota K, Webster AR, Moore AT, Allikmets R, Michaelides M
ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing in a British cohort.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570., [PMID:23982839]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We applied a recently reported next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy for screening the ABCA4 gene in a British cohort with ABCA4-associated disease and report novel mutations. METHODS: We identified 79 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ABCA4-associated disease who had a single variant identified by the ABCA4 microarray. Comprehensive phenotypic data were obtained, and the NGS strategy was applied to identify the second allele by means of sequencing the entire coding region and adjacent intronic sequences of the ABCA4 gene. Identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and assessed for pathogenicity by in silico analysis. RESULTS: Of the 42 variants detected by prescreening with the microarray, in silico analysis suggested that 34, found in 66 subjects, were disease-causing and 8, found in 13 subjects, were benign variants. We detected 42 variants by NGS, of which 39 were classified as disease-causing. Of these 39 variants, 31 were novel, including 16 missense, 7 splice-site-altering, 4 nonsense, 1 in-frame deletion, and 3 frameshift variants. Two or more disease-causing variants were confirmed in 37 (47%) of 79 patients, one disease-causing variant in 36 (46%) subjects, and no disease-causing variant in 6 (7%) individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the NGS platform for ABCA4 screening enabled detection of the second disease-associated allele in approximately half of the patients in a British cohort where one mutation had been detected with the arrayed primer extension (APEX) array. The time- and cost-efficient NGS strategy is useful in screening large cohorts, which will be increasingly valuable with the advent of ABCA4-directed therapies.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
55 1 c.161G>A p.C54Y DC c.2297G>T p.G766V DC 2 2 c.223T>G p.C75G DC c.5088C>G p.S1696R DC 2 3 c.740A>C p.N247T DC c.1433T>C p.I478T B c.2345G>A p.W782* DC 2 4 c.768G>T Splice site DC 1 5 c.1222C>T p.R408* DC c.2568C>A p.Y856* DC 2 6 c.1804C>T p.R602W DC c.859-9T>C Splice site PDC 2 7 c.1805G>A p.R602Q DC c.5113C>T p.R1705W DC 2 8 c.1922G>C p.C641S DC 1 9 c.1957C>T p.R653C DC 1 10 c.1957C>T p.R653C DC 1 11 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.655A>T p.R219* DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R219*) was APEX-false-negative 12 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 13 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 14 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC 1 15 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC 1 16 c.2894A>G p.N965S DC c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R1108C) was APEX-false-negative 17 c.3064G>A p.E1022K DC c.6729&#fe;4_&#fe;18delAGTTGGCCCTGGGGC Splice site DC 2 18 c.3064G>A p.E1022K DC 1 19 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.2942C>T p.P981L DC c.6529G>A p.D2177N B 2 20 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.1519G>T p.D507Y DC 2 21 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.4634G>A p.S1545N DC 2 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC 1 23 c.3292C>T p.R1098C DC c.3299T>A p.I1100N DC 2 24 c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC c.4978delC p.L1661* DC 2 25 c.3386G>A p.R1129H DC c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.4634G>A p.S1545N DC 3 Allele 2 (p.S1071fs) was APEX false-negative and allele 1 (p.R1129H) was NGS false-negative 26 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.3191-1G>T Splice site DC 2 27 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.3398T>C p.I1133T PDC 2 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.4070C>A p.A1357E DC 2 29 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.4773G>C Splice site DC 2 30 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 31 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 32 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 33 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* DC 1 34 c.4319T>C p.F1440S DC 1 35 c.4328G>A p.R1443H DC c.180delG p.M61fs DC 2 36 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y DC c.1726G>C p.D576H DC 2 37 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y DC 1 38 c.4537_4538insC p.Q1513fs DC c.5578C>T p.R1860W DC 2 Allele 1 (p.Q1513fs) was NGS-false-negative 39 c.4577C>T p.T1526M DC 1 T ABLE 2. Continued Pt Allele 1 Detected by APEX Allele 2 Detected by NGS Allele 3 Detected by NGS Total N of DC Variants Comments DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho.
X
ABCA4 p.Arg408* 23982839:55:196
status: NEW62 Hum Var Score (0-1) Site Wt CV Mt CV CV % Variation 3 c.161G>A p.C54Y 1 1 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.11 PRD 0.994 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs150774447) 3 c.223T>G p.C75G 1 2 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. NA POD 0.603 No change ND 5 c.466A>G p.I156V 2 77, 78 [ [ Papaioannou M, et al. 16 Tol. 0.46 B 0.003 No change 16/13006 db SNP (rs112467008) Benign 6 c.655A>T p.R219* 1 11 [ Xi Q, et al. 27 ND 6 c.740A>C p.N247T 1 3 [ [ APEX Del. NA B 0.135 No change ND 6 c.768G>T Splice site 1 4 [ [ Klevering BJ, et al. 22 Tol. 0.56 NA Don. 70.4 58 Site broken (17.51) ND 9 c.1222C>T p.R408* 1 5 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 ND 12 c.1726G>C p.D576H 1 36 [ Downs K, et al. 25 POD 0.688 Acc. 68.1 39.1 Site broken (42.54) 1/13006 13 c.1804C>T p.R602W 1 6 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 B 0.129 No change ND db SNP (rs 6179409) 13 c.1805G>A p.R602Q 1 7 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.04 PRD 0.513 Acc. 48.9 77.9 New site (&#fe;59.14) 2/13006 db SNP (rs61749410) 13 c.1906C>T p.Q636* 3 12, 13, 60 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs145961131) 13 c.1922G>C p.C641S 1 8 [ [ Stenirri S, et al. 24 Del. 0.00 No change ND db SNP (rs61749416) 14 c.1957C>T p.R653C 2 9, 10 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.999 No change ND db SNP (rs61749420) 17 c.2588G>C p.G863A/ p.DelG863 5 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 / Maugeri A, et al. 29 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.996 No change 68/13006 db SNP (rs76157638) 18 c.2701A>G p.T901A 1 74 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.82 B 0.008 23/13006 db SNP (rs139655975) Benign 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S 1 16 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.03 PRD 0.981 Acc. 53.4 82.3 New site (&#fe;54.26) ND db SNP (rs201471607) 20 c.2971G>C p.G991R 1 67 [ [ Yatsenko AN, et al. 13 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 28/13006 db SNP (rs147484266) Benign 22 c.3064G>A p.E1022K 2 17, 18 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.00 PRD 1.000 No change ND db SNP (rs61749459) 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs 5 19, 20, 21, 22, 25 [ [ APEX ND False-negative in APEX in patient 25 22 c.3292C>T p.R1098C 1 23 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. NA PRD 0.999 No change ND 22 c.3322C>T p.R1108C 3 16, 24, 61 [ [ Rozet JM, et al. 10 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.986 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs61750120) False-negative in APEX in patients 16 and 61 23 c.3386G>A p.R1129H 1 25 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 PRD 0.989 No change ND False-negative in NGS in patient 25 24 c.3602T>G p.L1201R 4 72, 73, 74, 79 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.37 B 0.052 Don. 61.3 73.7 New site (20.08) 416/13006 db SNP (rs61750126) Benign 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L 7 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.01 B 0.377 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs61750130) 28 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* 1 33 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 ND db SNP (rs61750137) 29 c.4283C>T p.T1428M 1 76 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.15 B 0.010 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs1800549) Benign 29 c.4319T>C p.F1440S 1 34 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 POD 0.744 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750141) 29 c.4326C>A p.N1442K 1 64 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Tol. NA POD 0.374 No change ND 29 c.4328G>A p.R1443H 1 35 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 1/13006 dbSNP (rs61750142) IVS29 c.4352&#fe;1G>A Splice site 1 73 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Don. 82.3 55.4 WT site broken (32.62) ND 30 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y 2 36, 37 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.994 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751402) 30 c.4538A>G p.Q1513R 1 67 [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Tol. NA Benign 0.043 Acc. 91.7 62.8 Site broken (31.55) ND T ABLE 3. Continued Exon/ IVS Nucleotide Substitution Protein Change/ Effect N of Alleles Identified Pt Method Previous Report SIFT Polyphen 2 HSF Matrix Allele Freq. by EVS Reference Comment APEX NGS Pred. Tol. Index (0-1) Pred.
X
ABCA4 p.Arg408* 23982839:62:581
status: NEW[hide] Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence and Optical C... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 1;56(12):7274-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17371. Duncker T, Stein GE, Lee W, Tsang SH, Zernant J, Bearelly S, Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Delori FC, Allikmets R, Sparrow JR
Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence and Optical Coherence Tomography in ABCA4 Carriers.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 1;56(12):7274-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17371., [PMID:26551331]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess whether carriers of ABCA4 mutations have increased RPE lipofuscin levels based on quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) and whether spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) reveals structural abnormalities in this cohort. METHODS: Seventy-five individuals who are heterozygous for ABCA4 mutations (mean age, 47.3 years; range, 9-82 years) were recruited as family members of affected patients from 46 unrelated families. For comparison, 57 affected family members with biallelic ABCA4 mutations (mean age, 23.4 years; range, 6-67 years) and two noncarrier siblings were also enrolled. Autofluorescence images (30 degrees , 488-nm excitation) were acquired with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope equipped with an internal fluorescent reference. The gray levels (GLs) of each image were calibrated to the reference, zero GL, magnification, and normative optical media density to yield qAF. Horizontal SD-OCT scans through the fovea were obtained and the thicknesses of the outer retinal layers were measured. RESULTS: In 60 of 65 carriers of ABCA4 mutations (age range, 9-60), qAF levels were within normal limits (95% confidence level) observed for healthy noncarrier subjects, while qAF levels of affected family members were significantly increased. Perifoveal fleck-like abnormalities were observed in fundus AF images in four carriers, and corresponding changes were detected in the outer retinal layers in SD-OCT scans. Thicknesses of the outer retinal layers were within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: With few exceptions, individuals heterozygous for ABCA4 mutations and between the ages of 9 and 60 years do not present with elevated qAF. In a small number of carriers, perifoveal fleck-like changes were visible.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
28 [L541P;A1038V] 0.10 0.10 OS n/a 141 S2.2 F 44.4 Indian Mother c.6729&#fe;5_&#fe;19del 0.10 0.00 OS 257 291 S2.3 M 56.2 Indian Father p.G1961E 0.00 0.00 OD 475 431 S3.4 F 54.1 White Mother p.G863A 0.00 0.00 OS 459 451 S3.5 F 82.0 White Grandmother p.G863A 0.00 0.00 OD n/a n/a S4.2 F 44.6 White Mother p.W855* 0.00 0.00 OD 330 n/a S4.3 M 40.9 White Father p.T1526M 0.00 0.00 OS 283 271 S5.2 F 71.5 White Sister p.C698Y 0.00 0.10 OD n/a n/a S5.3 F 67.5 White Sister c.2160&#fe;1G>C 0.00 0.00 OS n/a n/a S5.4 F 62.9 White Sister p.C698Y 0.00 0.00 OD n/a n/a S6.2 M 54.9 Black Brother p.T1526M 0.10 0.00 OS 477 423 S7.2 F 48.9 White Mother c.5196&#fe;1G>A 0.00 0.00 OS 443 415 S8.2 F 59.6 White Mother p.K346T 0.00 0.00 OD 546 483 S8.3 M 54.6 White Father p.T1117I 0.10 0.10 OD 289 n/a S9.2 F 51.5 White Mother c.5196&#fe;1137G>A 0.00 0.00 n/a 302 n/a S9.3 M 57.8 White Father p.C54Y 0.00 0.00 OS 419 375 S10.2 M 24.1 Indian Brother p.Q2220* 0.00 0.00 OD 227 227 S11.2 F 40.0 Asian Mother c.5923del 0.00 0.18 OD 229 191 S11.3 M 40.1 Asian Father p.R408* 0.00 0.00 OD 195 178 S12.2 F 53.2 White Mother p.L2027F 0.00 0.00 n/a 355 309 S13.2 F 49.8 White Mother p.R1161S 0.00 0.00 OS 367 372 S13.3 M 22.3 White Brother p.R1161S 0.00 0.00 OD 202 206 S14.2 F 67.0 White Mother p.P1380L 0.00 0.00 OD n/a n/a S14.3 F 24.4 White Sister p.P1380L 0.00 0.00 OS n/a 163 S15.3 F 26.8 White Sister c.3050&#fe;5G>A 0.00 0.00 n/a 293 281 S16.2 M 53.7 Black Father c.4253&#fe;5G>T 0.00 0.00 n/a n/a 204 S17.2 F 60.0 Hispanic Mother p.A1038V 0.00 0.00 n/a 247 n/a S18.2 F 41.8 Indian Father c.5917del 0.00 0.00 OD n/a 194 S18.3 M 48.6 Indian Mother c.859-9T>C 0.00 0.00 OD 253 215 S18.4 F 12.9 Indian Sister c.5917del 0.00 0.00 OD 84 93 S19.4 F 58.5 White Mother p.L2027F 0.00 0.00 OD 205 n/a S19.5 M 61.6 White Father p.G851D 0.10 0.10 OD n/a n/a S20.2 F 41.5 White Mother c.5312&#fe;1G>A 0.00 0.00 n/a 335 351 S20.3 M 39.0 White Father p.R2030* 0.00 0.10 n/a 442 n/a S21.3 F 53.1 White Mother p.G1961E 0.00 0.00 OD 490 488 S22.3 M 46.3 White Father p.L2027F 0.00 0.00 OS 386 376 S22.4 F 47.1 White Mother p.
X
ABCA4 p.Arg408* 26551331:28:1044
status: NEW68 [66G>A;859-9T>C] p.Q2220* CF 1.30 n/a n/a P 11.1 M 15.0 Asian p.R408* c.5935del 1.10 1.30 n/a n/a P 12.1&#a7; M 15.1 White p.L2027F p.R2077W 0.80 0.80 728 697 P 13.1&#a7; F 23.8 White p.R1161S 0.60 0.40 571 647 P 14.1&#a7; F 27.3 White p.P1380L p.P1380L 1.30 1.00 n/a 577 P 15.1 M 17.0 White p.G1961E c.3050&#fe;5G>A 0.88 0.88 n/a n/a P 15.2 F 22.0 White p.G1961E c.3050&#fe;5G>A 0.88 0.88 n/a n/a P 16.1 F 19.1 Black p.V989A c.4253&#fe;5G>T 0.30 0.40 97 n/a P 17.1 F 21.8 Hispanic p.A1038V p.G1441D 0.70 0.88 551 528 P 18.1 M 22.0 Indian c.859-9T>C c.5917del 0.88 0.88 527 n/a P 19.1&#a7; F 27.2 White p.G851D p.L2027F 0.88 0.88 448 459 P 19.2&#a7; F 29.2 White p.G851D p.L2027F 1.30 1.18 538 569 P 19.3 F 34.2 White p.G851D p.L2027F 1.00 1.30 442 n/a P 20.1 F 9.5 White c.5312&#fe;1G>A p.R2030* 0.88 0.70 998 929 P 21.1ߤ F 24.6 White p.N96D p.G1961E 0.30 0.18 513 549 P 21.2ߤ F 20.9 White p.N96D p.G1961E 0.30 0.40 397 355 P 22.1 M 8.0 White p.
X
ABCA4 p.Arg408* 26551331:68:64
status: NEW75 [W1408R;R1640W] 1.00 1.00 n/a n/a P 33.1&#a7; M 23.0 White p.R2030Q p.G1961E 1.00 1.00 334 347 P 34.1 M 46.9 White p.C1490Y p.G1961E 0.40 0.30 376 384 P 35.1ߥ M 24.8 White c.3050&#fe;5G>A p.G1961E 0.00 0.00 381 451 P 36.1ߥ F 29.3 Hispanic p.L541P p.G1961E 0.40 0.40 479 487 P 37.1ߤ F 24.7 White p.G1961E p.C2150R 0.88 0.88 405 396 P 38.1&#a7; M 11.7 White p.W821R p.C2150Y 0.40 0.40 306 n/a P 39.1 F 12.8 White p.P1380L c.5714&#fe;5G>A 0.60 0.40 558 573 P 39.2 M 14.1 White p.P1380L c.5714&#fe;5G>A 0.88 0.88 395 462 P 40.1ߤ F 16.2 White p.K1547* p.R2030Q 0.70 0.40 481 513 P 41.1 F 19.0 White p.C54Y 0.88 0.88 n/a n/a P 42.1ߤ F 13.0 White p.R1108C p.Q1412* 1.30 1.00 511 528 P 43.1ߤ M 17.4 White p.A1773V p.G1961E 0.88 0.88 340 366 P 44.1 M 14.0 Asian p.R408* c.4248_4250del 1.30 1.30 n/a n/a P 44.2 F 7.0 Asian p.R408* c.4248_4250del 1.30 1.30 n/a n/a P 45.1 F 42.4 White p.N965Y p.P1486L 0.10 0.40 n/a n/a BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; qAF8, average quantitative autofluorescence of the 8 measurement sites from all available images per eye; n/a, not available.
X
ABCA4 p.Arg408* 26551331:75:791
status: NEWX
ABCA4 p.Arg408* 26551331:75:851
status: NEW