ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Gly818Glu

ClinVar:	c.2453G>A , p.Gly818Glu ? , not provided
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (53%), C: D (66%), D: D (63%), E: D (91%), F: D (80%), H: D (63%), I: D (75%), K: D (66%), L: D (75%), M: D (75%), N: N (53%), P: D (71%), Q: D (59%), R: D (66%), S: N (57%), T: D (53%), V: D (71%), W: D (91%), Y: D (75%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, H: D, I: D, K: D, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: D, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] ABCA4 disease progression and a proposed strategy ... Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Mar 1;18(5):931-41. Epub 2008 Dec 12. Cideciyan AV, Swider M, Aleman TS, Tsybovsky Y, Schwartz SB, Windsor EA, Roman AJ, Sumaroka A, Steinberg JD, Jacobson SG, Stone EM, Palczewski K
ABCA4 disease progression and a proposed strategy for gene therapy.
Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Mar 1;18(5):931-41. Epub 2008 Dec 12., [PMID:19074458]

Abstract [show]
Autosomal recessive retinal diseases caused by mutations in the ABCA4 gene are being considered for gene replacement therapy. All individuals with ABCA4-disease show macular degeneration, but only some are thought to progress to retina-wide blindness. It is currently not predictable if or when specific ABCA4 genotypes will show extramacular disease, and how fast it will progress thereafter. Early clinical trials of focal subretinal gene therapy will aim to arrest disease progression in the extramacular retina. In 66 individuals with known disease-causing ABCA4 alleles, we defined retina-wide disease expression by measuring rod- and cone-photoreceptor-mediated vision. Serial measurements over a mean period of 8.7 years were consistent with a model wherein a normal plateau phase of variable length was followed by initiation of retina-wide disease that progressed exponentially. Once initiated, the mean rate of disease progression was 1.1 log/decade for rods and 0.45 log/decade for cones. Spatio-temporal progression of disease could be described as the sum of two components, one with a central-to-peripheral gradient and the other with a uniform retina-wide pattern. Estimates of the age of disease initiation were used as a severity metric and contributions made by each ABCA4 allele were predicted. One-third of the non-truncating alleles were found to cause more severe disease than premature truncations supporting the existence of a pathogenic component beyond simple loss of function. Genotype-based inclusion/exclusion criteria and prediction of the age of retina-wide disease initiation will be invaluable for selecting appropriate candidates for clinical trials in ABCA4 disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
127 And for an additional eight mutations (G818E, A1038V;L541P, E1087D, R1108C, E1122K, IVS40þ5G.A, L1940P and K2172R), we performed severity estimates recursively by using estimates established above. Login to comment
151 Estimated severity of ABCA4 alleles and their properties ABCA4 allele Delay of retina-wide disease initiation (years)a In vitro or in vivo studiesb Molecular structural localizationc C2150Y 225.8 NBD-2 A1038V;L541P 214.0 35, 38 ECD-1/NBD-1 IVS38-10 T.C 211.1 L244P 25.7 ECD-1 E1122K 23.5 NBD-1 C54Y 22.1 35 ECD-1 IVS35þ2 T.C 22.1 R602W 21.8 38 ECD-1 V1896D 21.8 TM12 L1940P 21.4 NBD-2 Truncation mutationsd 0.0 E1087D 2.8 NBD-1 R220C 3.9 ECD-1 A1598D 3.9 ECD-2 R1640Q 3.9 ECD-2 R1098C 4.9 NBD-1 P1380L 7.4 35 TM7 N965S 7.6 35 NBD-1 V1433I 8.6 ECD-2 R1108C 10.4 35 NBD-1 T1526M 14.5 35 ECD-2 R2030Q 14.5 NBD-2 L2027F 15.1 35,37 NBD-2 G818E 17.3 35 TM5/TM6 S100P 18.2 ECD-1 L1201R 18.2 NBD-1 R18W 18.5 Nt D600E 18.5 ECD-1 L11P 21.7 Nt D654N 25.3 36 ECD-1 K2172R 27.9 NBD-2 IVS40þ5 G.A 28.1 G1961E 37.9 35 NBD-2 G1961R 44.0 NBD-2 a Delay of retina-wide disease initiation relative to the standard of age 10.6 years. Login to comment

[hide] Mutations in ABCA4 result in accumulation of lipof... Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Mar 1;13(5):525-34. Epub 2004 Jan 6. Cideciyan AV, Aleman TS, Swider M, Schwartz SB, Steinberg JD, Brucker AJ, Maguire AM, Bennett J, Stone EM, Jacobson SG
Mutations in ABCA4 result in accumulation of lipofuscin before slowing of the retinoid cycle: a reappraisal of the human disease sequence.
Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Mar 1;13(5):525-34. Epub 2004 Jan 6., [PMID:14709597]

Abstract [show]
Mutations in ABCA4, which encodes a photoreceptor specific ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCR), cause autosomal recessive forms of human blindness due to retinal degeneration (RD) including Stargardt disease. The exact disease sequence leading to photoreceptor and vision loss in ABCA4-RD is not known. Extrapolation from murine and in vitro studies predicts that two of the earliest pathophysiological features resulting from disturbed ABCR function in man would be slowed kinetics of the retinoid cycle and accelerated deposition of lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). To determine the human pathogenetic sequence, we studied surrogate measures of retinoid cycle kinetics, lipofuscin accumulation, and rod and cone photoreceptor and RPE loss in ABCA4-RD patients with a wide spectrum of disease severities. There were different extents of photoreceptor/RPE loss and lipofuscin accumulation in different regions of the retina. Slowing of retinoid cycle kinetics was not present in all patients; when present, it was not homogeneous across the retina; and the extent of slowing correlated well with the degree of degeneration. The orderly relationship between these phenotypic features permitted the development of a model of disease sequence in ABCA4-RD. The model predicted lipofuscin accumulation as a key and early component of the disease expression in man, as in mice. In man, however, abnormal slowing of the rod and cone retinoid cycle occurs at later stages of the disease sequence. Knowledge of the human ABCA4 disease sequence will be critical for defining rates of progression, selecting appropriate patients and retinal locations for future therapy, and choosing appropriate treatment outcomes.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
47 Alleles demonstrated to have major abnormalities in vitro (7) could result in mild disease (P10: E1087K/G1961E) or severe disease (P5: G818E/ L541Pþ A1038V; or P9: N965S/N965S). Login to comment

[hide] An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89. Webster AR, Heon E, Lotery AJ, Vandenburgh K, Casavant TL, Oh KT, Beck G, Fishman GA, Lam BL, Levin A, Heckenlively JR, Jacobson SG, Weleber RG, Sheffield VC, Stone EM
An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89., [PMID:11328725]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess the allelic variation of the ATP-binding transporter protein (ABCA4). METHODS: A combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and automated DNA sequencing was used to systematically screen this gene for sequence variations in 374 unrelated probands with a clinical diagnosis of Stargardt disease, 182 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 96 normal subjects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of any single variant or class of variant between the control and AMD groups. In contrast, truncating variants, amino acid substitutions, synonymous codon changes, and intronic variants were significantly enriched in patients with Stargardt disease when compared with their presence in subjects without Stargardt disease (Kruskal-Wallis P < 0.0001 for each variant group). Overall, there were 2480 instances of 213 different variants in the ABCA4 gene, including 589 instances of 97 amino acid substitutions, and 45 instances of 33 truncating variants. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 97 amino acid substitutions, 11 occurred at a frequency that made them unlikely to be high-penetrance recessive disease-causing variants (HPRDCV). After accounting for variants in cis, one or more changes that were compatible with HPRDCV were found on 35% of all Stargardt-associated alleles overall. The nucleotide diversity of the ABCA4 coding region, a collective measure of the number and prevalence of polymorphic sites in a region of DNA, was found to be 1.28, a value that is 9 to 400 times greater than that of two other macular disease genes that were examined in a similar fashion (VMD2 and EFEMP1).

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
102 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 2 160 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 Ͻ0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4353 - 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4539 ϩ 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 Ͻ0.01 39 5584 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5714 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu Ͻ0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 Ͻ0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 Ͻ0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 Ͻ0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6729 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment
103 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 2 160 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 b0d;0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4353 afa; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4539 af9; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 b0d;0.01 39 5584 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5714 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu b0d;0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 b0d;0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 b0d;0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 b0d;0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6729 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment

[hide] Molecular genetic analysis of ABCR gene in Japanes... Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000 May-Jun;44(3):245-9. Fuse N, Suzuki T, Wada Y, Yoshida M, Shimura M, Abe T, Nakazawa M, Tamai M
Molecular genetic analysis of ABCR gene in Japanese dry form age-related macular degeneration.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000 May-Jun;44(3):245-9., [PMID:10913642]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To explore whether the mutation in the retina-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCR) gene, the Stargardt's disease gene, contributes to the prevalence of the dry form of age-related macular degeneration (dry AMD) in Japanese unrelated patients. METHODS: Twenty-five Japanese unrelated patients with dry AMD who were diagnosed by fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography were chosen as the dry AMD group. None of these cases had apparent choroidal neovascularization. To detect the mutations in the ABCR gene, genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes of peripheral blood, and 26 exons of the ABCR gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All the PCR products were then directly sequenced. When a mutation was detected, the occurrence of a mutation was compared between these AMD patients and the control group. RESULTS: After direct sequencing, a point mutation in exon 29 was found in one of the 25 dry AMD patients. In addition, a polymorphism in exon 45 was found in two other patients, and three sequence variations in exon 23 were detected in all patients. The incidence in AMD patients in whom a mutation in exon 29 (4%) was detected was less than that in controls (5%). Screening of the intron-exon boundaries also led to the identification of intronic mutation in intron 33. CONCLUSION: In this study we found no relationship between allelic variation in the ABCR gene and the prevalence of dry AMD in Japanese unrelated patients.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
31 Mutations Found in ABCR* Gene in 26 Exons Examined in This Study Exon AMD† Stargardt`s Disease Exon AMD Stargardt`s Disease 11 E471K 29 T1428M 15 31 R1517S 16 G818E, G863A (D847H) 33 I1562T G1578R 17 34 N1614FS 18 35 19 V931M, 2884delC N965M, (R943Q) 36 5196ϩ1G→A 5041deL15 5196ϩ2T→C 20 40 R1898H R1898H 21 A1028V 42 G1961E G1961E 22 3211insGT, V1072A E1087K 43 L1970F 6006ϩ1G→T 23 R1129L 44 L2027F, R2038W (I2023I) 24 45 V2050L, R2077W (I2083I) 25 46 R2106C (V2094V) 27 48 6519⌬11bp D2177N 6568⌬C 6519⌬11bp 6709insG *ABCR: ATP-binding cassette transporter. Login to comment

[hide] Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-spe... Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34. Lewis RA, Shroyer NF, Singh N, Allikmets R, Hutchinson A, Li Y, Lupski JR, Leppert M, Dean M
Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter gene, ABCR, in Stargardt disease.
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34., [PMID:9973280]

Abstract [show]
Mutation scanning and direct DNA sequencing of all 50 exons of ABCR were completed for 150 families segregating recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). ABCR variations were identified in 173 (57%) disease chromosomes, the majority of which represent missense amino acid substitutions. These ABCR variants were not found in 220 unaffected control individuals (440 chromosomes) but do cosegregate with the disease in these families with STGD1, and many occur in conserved functional domains. Missense amino acid substitutions located in the amino terminal one-third of the protein appear to be associated with earlier onset of the disease and may represent misfolding alleles. The two most common mutant alleles, G1961E and A1038V, each identified in 16 of 173 disease chromosomes, composed 18.5% of mutations identified. G1961E has been associated previously, at a statistically significant level in the heterozygous state, with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Clinical evaluation of these 150 families with STGD1 revealed a high frequency of AMD in first- and second-degree relatives. These findings support the hypothesis that compound heterozygous ABCR mutations are responsible for STGD1 and that some heterozygous ABCR mutations may enhance susceptibility to AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
76 2 0071GrA R24H 1 19 2894ArG N965S 3 36 5196ϩ1GrA Splice 2 3 0161GrA C54Y 1 21 3113CrT A1038V 16 5196ϩ2TrC Splice 1 0179CrT A60V 1 22 3211insGT FS 1 37 5281del9 PAL1761del 1 0203CrG P68R 1 3212CrT S1071L 1 38 5459GrC R1820P 1 0223TrG C75G 1 3215TrC V1072A 1 39 5512CrT H1838Y 1 6 0634CrT R212C 1 3259GrA E1087K 1 5527CrT R1843W 1 0664del13 FS 1 3322CrT R1108C 6 40 5585-1GrA Splice 1 0746ArG D249G 1 23 3364GrA E1122K 1 5657GrA G1886E 1 8 1007CrG S336C 1 3385GrT R1129C 1 5693GrA R1898H 4 1018TrG Y340D 1 3386GrT R1129L 2 5714ϩ5GrA Splice 8 11 1411GrA E471K 1 24 3602TrG L1201R 1 42 5882GrA G1961E 16 12 1569TrG D523E 1 25 3610GrA D1204N 1 5898ϩ1GrT Splice 3 1622TrC L541P 1 28 4139CrT P1380L 4 43 5908CrT L1970F 1 1715GrA R572Q 2 4216CrT H1406Y 1 5929GrA G1977S 1 1715GrC R572P 1 4222TrC W1408R 4 6005ϩ1GrT Splice 1 13 1804CrT R602W 1 4232insTATG FS 1 44 6079CrT L2027F 11 1822TrA F608I 2 4253ϩ5GrT Splice 1 6088CrT R2030X 1 1917CrA Y639X 1 29 4297GrA V1433I 1 6089GrA R2030Q 1 1933GrA D645N 1 4316GrA G1439D 2 6112CrT R2038W 1 14 2005delAT FS 1 4319TrC F1440S 1 45 6148GrC V2050L 2 2090GrA W697X 1 4346GrA W1449X 1 6166ArT K2056X 1 2160ϩ1GrC Splice 1 30a 4462TrC C1488R 2 6229CrT R2077W 1 16 2453GrA G818E 1 4457CrT P1486L 1 46 6286GrA E2096K 1 2461TrA W821R 1 30b 4469GrA C1490Y 3 6316CrT R2106C 1 2536GrC D846H 1 4539ϩ1GrT Splice 1 47 6391GrA E2131K 1 2552GrC G851D 1 31 4577CrT T1526M 7 6415CrT R2139W 1 17 2588GrC G863A 11 4594GrA D1532N 3 6445CrT R2149X 1 19 2791GrA V931M 2 35 4947delC FS 1 48 6543del36 1181del12 1 2827CrT R943W 1 36 5041del15 VVAIC1681del 2 6709insG FS 1 2884delC FS 1 5087GrA S1696N 1 NOTE.-FS ϭ frameshift. Login to comment
77 2 0071GrA R24H 1 19 2894ArG N965S 3 36 5196af9;1GrA Splice 2 3 0161GrA C54Y 1 21 3113CrT A1038V 16 5196af9;2TrC Splice 1 0179CrT A60V 1 22 3211insGT FS 1 37 5281del9 PAL1761del 1 0203CrG P68R 1 3212CrT S1071L 1 38 5459GrC R1820P 1 0223TrG C75G 1 3215TrC V1072A 1 39 5512CrT H1838Y 1 6 0634CrT R212C 1 3259GrA E1087K 1 5527CrT R1843W 1 0664del13 FS 1 3322CrT R1108C 6 40 5585afa;1GrA Splice 1 0746ArG D249G 1 23 3364GrA E1122K 1 5657GrA G1886E 1 8 1007CrG S336C 1 3385GrT R1129C 1 5693GrA R1898H 4 1018TrG Y340D 1 3386GrT R1129L 2 5714af9;5GrA Splice 8 11 1411GrA E471K 1 24 3602TrG L1201R 1 42 5882GrA G1961E 16 12 1569TrG D523E 1 25 3610GrA D1204N 1 5898af9;1GrT Splice 3 1622TrC L541P 1 28 4139CrT P1380L 4 43 5908CrT L1970F 1 1715GrA R572Q 2 4216CrT H1406Y 1 5929GrA G1977S 1 1715GrC R572P 1 4222TrC W1408R 4 6005af9;1GrT Splice 1 13 1804CrT R602W 1 4232insTATG FS 1 44 6079CrT L2027F 11 1822TrA F608I 2 4253af9;5GrT Splice 1 6088CrT R2030X 1 1917CrA Y639X 1 29 4297GrA V1433I 1 6089GrA R2030Q 1 1933GrA D645N 1 4316GrA G1439D 2 6112CrT R2038W 1 14 2005delAT FS 1 4319TrC F1440S 1 45 6148GrC V2050L 2 2090GrA W697X 1 4346GrA W1449X 1 6166ArT K2056X 1 2160af9;1GrC Splice 1 30a 4462TrC C1488R 2 6229CrT R2077W 1 16 2453GrA G818E 1 4457CrT P1486L 1 46 6286GrA E2096K 1 2461TrA W821R 1 30b 4469GrA C1490Y 3 6316CrT R2106C 1 2536GrC D846H 1 4539af9;1GrT Splice 1 47 6391GrA E2131K 1 2552GrC G851D 1 31 4577CrT T1526M 7 6415CrT R2139W 1 17 2588GrC G863A 11 4594GrA D1532N 3 6445CrT R2149X 1 19 2791GrA V931M 2 35 4947delC FS 1 48 6543del36 1181del12 1 2827CrT R943W 1 36 5041del15 VVAIC1681del 2 6709insG FS 1 2884delC FS 1 5087GrA S1696N 1 NOTE.-FS afd; frameshift. Login to comment

[hide] Exome sequencing analysis identifies compound hete... PLoS One. 2014 Mar 14;9(3):e91962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091962. eCollection 2014. Zhou Y, Tao S, Chen H, Huang L, Zhu X, Li Y, Wang Z, Lin H, Hao F, Yang Z, Wang L, Zhu X
Exome sequencing analysis identifies compound heterozygous mutation in ABCA4 in a Chinese family with Stargardt disease.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 14;9(3):e91962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091962. eCollection 2014., [PMID:24632595]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease is the most common cause of juvenile macular dystrophy. Five subjects from a two-generation Chinese family with Stargardt disease are reported in this study. All family members underwent complete ophthalmologic examinations. Patients of the family initiated the disease during childhood, developing progressively impaired central vision and bilateral atrophic macular lesions in the retinal pigmental epithelium (RPE) that resembled a "beaten-bronze" appearance. Peripheral venous blood was obtained from all patients and their family members for genetic analysis. Exome sequencing was used to analyze the exome of two patients II1, II2. A total of 50709 variations shared by the two patients were subjected to several filtering steps against existing variation databases. Identified variations were verified in all family members by PCR and Sanger sequencing. Compound heterozygous variants p.Y808X and p.G607R of the ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 4 (ABCA4) gene, which encodes the ABCA4 protein, a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport superfamily, were identified as causative mutations for Stargardt disease of this family. Our findings provide one novel ABCA4 mutation in Chinese patients with Stargardt disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
160 The novel stopgain p.Y808X mutation in exon 16 was detected in a heterozygous state, close to the previously reported mutation p.G818E [11]. Login to comment

[hide] ABCA4 mutational spectrum in Mexican patients with... Exp Eye Res. 2013 Apr;109:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Feb 16. Chacon-Camacho OF, Granillo-Alvarez M, Ayala-Ramirez R, Zenteno JC
ABCA4 mutational spectrum in Mexican patients with Stargardt disease: Identification of 12 novel mutations and evidence of a founder effect for the common p.A1773V mutation.
Exp Eye Res. 2013 Apr;109:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Feb 16., [PMID:23419329]

Abstract [show]
The aim of this study was to assess the mutational spectrum of the ABCA4 gene in a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease from Mexico, a previously uncharacterized population. Clinical diagnosis in each patient was supported by a complete ophthalmological assessment that included visual acuity measurement, a slit lamp examination, a fundus examination and photography, electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, and computerized visual fields testing. Molecular analysis was performed by PCR amplification and direct nucleotide sequence of the 50 exons of the ABCA4 gene in genomic DNA. A total of 31 unrelated subjects with the disease were enrolled in the study. Molecular analysis in the total group of 62 alleles allowed the identification of 46 mutant ABCA4 alleles carrying 29 different pathogenic disease-associated mutations. Two ABCA4 mutant alleles were detected in 20 of the 31 patients (64.5%), a single disease allele was identified in six (19.4%), and no mutant alleles were detected in five of the cases (16.1%). Most patients with two ABCA4 mutations (11/20, 55%) were compound heterozygotes. Twelve variants were novel ABCA4 mutations. Nucleotide substitutions were the most frequent type of variation, occurring in 26 out of 29 (89.7%) different mutations. The two most common mutations in our study were the missense changes p.A1773V and p.G818E, which were identified in eight (17%) and seven (15%) of the total 46 disease-associated alleles, respectively. Haplotype analyses of intragenic SNPs in four subjects carrying the p.A1773V mutation supported a common origin for this mutation. In conclusion, this is the first report of ABCA4 molecular screening in Latin American Stargardt disease patients. Our results expand the mutational spectrum of the disease by adding 12 novel ABCA4 pathogenic variants and support the occurrence of a founder effect for the p.A1773V mutation in the Mexican population. The identification of recurrent mutations in our cohort will direct future ABCA4 molecular screening in patients from this ethnic group.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
10 The two most common mutations in our study were the missense changes p.A1773V and p.G818E, which were identified in eight (17%) and seven (15%) of the total 46 disease-associated alleles, respectively. Login to comment
79 The two most common mutations in our study were the missense changes p.A1773V and p.G818E, which were identified in eight (17%) and seven (15%) of the total 46 disease-associated alleles, respectively (Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4). Login to comment
82 These mutations were p.R24W, p.G818E, p.P1380L, p.V1682_V1686del, p.R1705Q, p.A1773V, p.I1775N, p.Y1779H, and p.N1868I. Login to comment
100 Allele 1 Allele 2 Genotype Exon Nucleotide change Polypeptide change Exon Nucleotide change Polypeptide change Familial case # 1 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) Homozygous 2 e NI e e NI e e 3 6 c.634C>T p.R212C (D) 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) Compound heterozygous 4 23 c.3386G>T p.R1129L (D) 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L (D) Compound heterozygous 5 e NI e e NI e e 6 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) Homozygous 7 e NI e e NI e e 8 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) 28 c.4249_4251 delTTC p.F1417del (D; N) Compound heterozygous 9 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) Homozygous Sporadic case # 1 8 c.868C>T p.R290W (D) e IVS8&#fe;1G>A Splicing (D; N) Compound heterozygous 2 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V (D) - NI - Heterozygous 3 20 c.3041T>G p.L1014R (D) 1; 49 c.52C>T; c.6764G>T p.R18W (D); p.S2255I (B) Compound heterozygous 4 13; 19 c.1804C>T; c.2828G>A p.R602W (D); p.R943Q (U) 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) Compound heterozygous 5 38 c.5324T>A p. I1775N (D; N) 38 c.5324T>A p.I1775N (D; N) Homozygous 6 e NI e e NI e e 7 49 c.6764G>T p.S2255I (B) 49 c.6764 G>T p.S2255I (B) Homozygous 8 19; 40 c.2828 G>A; c.5503A>T p.R943Q (U); p.N1868I (U) 3 c.265G>T p.E89* (D; N) Compound heterozygous 9 38 c.5335T>C p.Y1779H (D;N) 38 c.5335T>C p.Y1779H (D;N) Homozygous 10 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) Homozygous 11 6 c.723A>T p.E241D (D;N) 36 c.5114G>A p.R1705Q (D) Compound heterozygous 12 2 c.71G>A (D) p.R24H e NI e Heterozygous 13 30 c.4537_4538insC p.Q1513Pfs*41 (D; N) e NI e Heterozygous 14 32 c.4667G>C p.R1556T (D; N) 32 c.4667G>C p.R1556T (D; N) Homozygous 15 45 c.6221G>T p.G2074V (D; N) 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E (D) Compound heterozygous 16 16; 41 c.2453G>A; c.5824G>C p. G818E (D); p. E1942Q (B;N) 46 c.6384A>G p.H2128R (D) Compound heterozygous 17 16 c.2453G>A p. G818E (D) e NI e Heterozygous 18 32 c.4653G>A p. W1551* (D; N) e NI e Heterozygous 19 23 c.3386G>T p. R1129L (D) e NI e Heterozygous 20 36 c.5045_5059del GTTGCCATCTGCGTG p.V1682_ V1686del (D; N) 29; 49 c.4328G>A; c.6764G>T p.R1443H (D); p.S2255I (B) Compound heterozygous 21 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S (D) 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S (D) Homozygous 22 e NI e e NI e e STGD accounts for approximately 7% of all retinal dystrophies; it is one of the most common genetic forms of juvenile or early adult onset macular degeneration. Login to comment
119 ABCA4 Exon # Nucleotide change Predicted protein effect Number of alleles Population genotypic frequency in EVS Population allelic frequency in EVS (%) 1 c.52C>T p.R18W 1 TT &#bc; 0/TC &#bc; 2/CC &#bc; 6501 T &#bc; 0.015/C &#bc; 99.985 2 c.71G>A p.R24H 1 AA &#bc; 0/AG &#bc; 1/GG &#bc; 6502 A &#bc; 0.008/G &#bc; 99.992 3 c.265G>T p.E89* (N) 1 NR NR 6 c.634C>T p.R212C 1 TT &#bc; 0/TC &#bc; 2/CC &#bc; 6501 T &#bc; 0.015/C &#bc; 99.985 6 c.723A>T p.E241D (N) 1 NR NR 8 c.868C>T p.R290W 1 NR NR IVS8 IVS8 &#fe; 1G>A Splicing mutation (N) 1 NR NR 13 c.1804C>T p.R602W 1 NR NR 16 c.2453G>A p.G818E 7 NR NR 19 c.2828G>A p.R943Q 2 AA &#bc; 8/AG &#bc; 400/GG &#bc; 6095 A &#bc; 3.199/G &#bc; 96.801 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S 2 GG &#bc; 0/GA &#bc; 1/AA &#bc; 6502 G &#bc; 0.008/A &#bc; 99.992 20 c.3041T>G p.L1014R 1 NR NR 23 c.3386G>T p.R1129L 2 NR NR 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L 1 TT &#bc; 0/TC &#bc; 2/CC &#bc; 6501 T &#bc; 0.015/C &#bc; 99.985 28 c.4249_4251del TTC p.F1417del (N) 1 NR NR 29 c.4328G>A p.R1443H 1 AA &#bc; 0/AG &#bc; 1/GG &#bc; 6502 A &#bc; 0.008/G &#bc; 99.992 30 c.4537_4538insC p.Q1513Pfs*41 (N) 1 NR NR 32 c.4653G>A p.W1551* (N) 1 NR NR 32 c.4667G>C p.R1556T (N) 2 NR NR 36 c.5044_5058del GTTGCCATCTGCGTG p.V1682_V1686del (N) 1 NR NR 36 c.5114G>A p.R1705Q 1 AA &#bc; 0/AG &#bc; 1/GG &#bc; 6502 A &#bc; 0.008/G &#bc; 99.992 38 c.5318C>T p.A1773V 8 NR NR 38 c.5324T>A p.I1775N (N) 2 NR NR 38 c.5335T>C p.Y1779H (N) 2 NR NR 40 c.5503A>T p.N1868I 1 TT &#bc; 16/TA &#bc; 589/AA &#bc; 5898 T &#bc; 4.775/A &#bc; 95.225 41 c.5824G>C p.E1942Q (N) 1 NR NR 45 c.6221G>T p.G2074V (N) 1 NR NR 46 c.6384A>G p.H2128R 1 NR NR 49 c.6764G>T p.S2255I 4 TT &#bc; 516/TG &#bc; 1473/GG &#bc; 4514 T &#bc; 19.26/G &#bc; 80.74 gold standard for ABCA4 mutational screening. Login to comment
124 The novel p.E1942Q mutation was detected in a heterozygous state and was predict to be a benign variant by PolyPhen2; however, it occurred as a complex allele together with p.G818E and coexisting with p.H2128R in the other allele. Login to comment
126 Interestingly, five out of 46 mutant alleles (11%) were complex alleles (p.R18W &#fe; p.S2255I; p.R602W &#fe; p.R943W; p.R943W &#fe; p.N1868I; p.G818E &#fe; p.E1942Q; and p.R1443H &#fe; p.S2255I), a frequency that is in agreement with previous reports (Lewis et al., 1999; Shroyer et al., 2001; Zernant et al., 2011). Login to comment
132 The second most common ABCA4 mutation in the present study was c.2453G>A, which is located in exon 16, predicts the missense p.G818E change, and was detected in seven out of 46 (15%) mutant alleles. Login to comment
134 The p.G818E mutation is located in the loop connecting transmembrane helices 5 and 6 and has been previously associated with a mild retinal phenotype (Cideciyan et al., 2009). Login to comment