ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Arg1108His

ClinVar:	c.3323G>A , p.Arg1108His ? , not provided c.3323G>T , p.Arg1108Leu ? , not provided c.3322C>T , p.Arg1108Cys D , Pathogenic
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (75%), C: D (85%), D: D (80%), E: D (75%), F: D (95%), G: D (80%), H: D (71%), I: D (71%), K: N (57%), L: D (80%), M: D (75%), N: D (66%), P: D (80%), Q: D (66%), S: D (71%), T: D (66%), V: D (71%), W: D (85%), Y: D (71%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: N, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Quantification of peripapillary sparing and macula... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 10;52(11):8006-15. Print 2011. Burke TR, Rhee DW, Smith RT, Tsang SH, Allikmets R, Chang S, Lazow MA, Hood DC, Greenstein VC
Quantification of peripapillary sparing and macular involvement in Stargardt disease (STGD1).
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 10;52(11):8006-15. Print 2011., [PMID:21873672]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To quantify and compare structure and function across the macula and peripapillary area in Stargardt disease (STGD1). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (27 eyes) and 12 age-similar controls (12 eyes) were studied. Patients were classified on the basis of full-field electroretinogram (ERG) results: Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) horizontal line scans were obtained through the fovea and peripapillary area. The thicknesses of the outer nuclear layer plus outer plexiform layer (ONL+), outer segment (OS), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) were measured through the fovea, and peripapillary areas from 1 degrees to 4 degrees temporal to the optic disc edge using a computer-aided, manual segmentation technique. Visual sensitivities in the central 10 degrees were assessed using microperimetry and related to retinal layer thicknesses. RESULTS: Compared to the central macula, the differences between controls and patients in ONL+, OS, and RPE layer thicknesses were less in the nasal and temporal macula. Relative sparing of the ONL+ and/or OS layers was detected in the nasal (i.e., peripapillary) macula in 8 of 13 patients with extramacular disease on FAF; relative functional sparing was also detected in this subgroup. All 14 patients with disease confined to the central macula, as detected on FAF, showed ONL+ and OS layer thinning in regions of normal RPE thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Relative peripapillary sparing was detected in STGD1 patients with extramacular disease on FAF. Photoreceptor thinning may precede RPE degeneration in STGD1.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
112 Summary of Clinical, Demographic, and Genetic Data Patient Sex Age at Exam (y) Eye VA BCEA 1 SD (deg 2 ) Eccentricity of PRL (deg) ERG Group FAF Abnormalities Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 3 Distribution Peripapillary Area 1 F 43 OS 20/20 0.73 0 II M - A1799D ND ND 2 M 30 OS 20/150 3.21 6 I M - T1253M G1961E ND 3 F 55 OD 20/30 1.82 0 I EM - G863A IVS28af9;5 Gb0e;T ND 4 M 44 OD 20/25 0.65 0 I M - E161K ND ND 5.1 F 24 OD 20/200 1.57 1 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 5.2 F 22 OD 20/30 2.74 1 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 6.1 F 21 OD 20/150 2.01 1 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 6.2 F 18 OS 20/100 3.09 4 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 7 F 27 OS 20/400 2.97 9* II EM Peripapillary atrophy L2027F G851D ND 8 M 34 OS 20/100 2.16 4 I M - G1961E G1961E ND 9 M 20 OS 20/150 2.77 4 I M - IVS20af9;5 Gb0e;A G1961E ND 10 F 23 OS 20/150 9.05 5 I M - L541P/A1038V I1846T ND 11 M 59 OS 20/100 6.52 10 II EM - P1380L S1696N ND 12 M 49 OD 20/150 9.97 1 I EM Nasalaf9;temporal flecks R1108H P1380L ND 13 M 47 OS 20/80 5.62 7 I EM - G863A Y106X ND 14 F 42 OD 20/200 9.53 9 I EM Temporal flecks N965S ND ND 15 M 14 OD 20/200 23.84 1 II EM Nasal flecks IVS38-10 Tb0e;C IVS40af9;5 Gb0e;A ND 16 M 52 OS 20/20 1.3 0 I M - IVS38-10 Tb0e;C ND ND 17 M 34 OS 20/30 2.8 1 I M - L541P/A1038V G1961E ND 18 F 33 OD 20/100 6 6 I M - G1961E R2077W ND 19 F 22 OS 20/60 11 4 I M - A854T A1038V C2150Y 20 F 34 OS 20/200 14.2 14 I EM - G1961E ND ND 21 F 19 OD 20/200 3.7 12 I EM - R602W M18821 ND 22 F 27 OD 20/400 9.6 9 II EM Peripapillary atrophy P1380L P1380L ND 23 F 18 OS 20/50 4.9 5 I EM - R1640W V1693I ND 24 M 22 OS 20/150 10.5 2 I EM - C54Y ND ND 25 M 44 OS 20/150 9.1 5 I EM - R1640W ND ND VA, visual acuity; Rel. Login to comment

[hide] Cone photoreceptor abnormalities correlate with vi... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 May 17;52(6):3281-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6538. Print 2011 May. Chen Y, Ratnam K, Sundquist SM, Lujan B, Ayyagari R, Gudiseva VH, Roorda A, Duncan JL
Cone photoreceptor abnormalities correlate with vision loss in patients with Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 May 17;52(6):3281-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6538. Print 2011 May., [PMID:21296825]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE. To study the relationship between macular cone structure, fundus autofluorescence (AF), and visual function in patients with Stargardt disease (STGD). METHODS. High-resolution images of the macula were obtained with adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in 12 patients with STGD and 27 age-matched healthy subjects. Measures of retinal structure and AF were correlated with visual function, including best-corrected visual acuity, color vision, kinetic and static perimetry, fundus-guided microperimetry, and full-field electroretinography. Mutation analysis of the ABCA4 gene was completed in all patients. RESULTS. Patients were 15 to 55 years old, and visual acuity ranged from 20/25-20/320. Central scotomas were present in all patients, although the fovea was spared in three patients. The earliest cone spacing abnormalities were observed in regions of homogeneous AF, normal visual function, and normal outer retinal structure. Outer retinal structure and AF were most normal near the optic disc. Longitudinal studies showed progressive increases in AF followed by reduced AF associated with losses of visual sensitivity, outer retinal layers, and cones. At least one disease-causing mutation in the ABCA4 gene was identified in 11 of 12 patients studied; 1 of 12 patients showed no disease-causing ABCA4 mutations. CONCLUSIONS. AOSLO imaging demonstrated abnormal cone spacing in regions of abnormal fundus AF and reduced visual function. These findings provide support for a model of disease progression in which lipofuscin accumulation results in homogeneously increased AF with cone spacing abnormalities, followed by heterogeneously increased AF with cone loss, then reduced AF with cone and RPE cell death.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
109 TABLE1.ClinicalCharacteristicsofthePatientswithStargardtDisease Patient/EyeAge(y)/SexABCA4MutationsBCVA ETDRS ScoreColorVision* GoldmannVisual Field† HumphreyVisualField 10-2 Foveal Threshold (dB)Fixation F1P1OS16/MPro1486Leu/6bp insϩ32bpdel atbase672 20/4075None,0,1.34V4e:full;14e:1°ctl scotoma 8°ctlscotomawithϽ1 logunitsensitivityloss 30Foveal F1P2OS15/MPro1486Leu/6bp insϩ32bpdel atbase672 20/16040NS,2,1.99V4e:full;14e:1°ctl scotoma Densescotomabeginning 4°superiortofixation 27Superior F2P1OS25/FGlu1412Stop20/6361None,0,1.00V4e,14e:full,12e: 5°ctlscotoma 6°ctlscotoma31Foveal F3P1OD24/MGly863Ala20/10050NS,6,2.72V4e:full;14e:3-4° ctlscotoma 3°-4°scotomasuperior tofixation 32Superior F4P1OS16/FNodisease-causing mutations identified 20/20035NS,5,2.25V4e:full;14e:35° ctlscotoma 15°ctlscotomawith eccentricfixation superonasally 8Nasal,slightlybelow horizontal meridian F5P1OS42/M5461-10TϾCintron 39/Gly1961Glu 20/32023NS,5,2.27V4e:full;14e:10° ctlscotoma 12°densectlscotoma27Superonasal F6P1OS19/FLys223Gln/C2291 15bp/5amino aciddeletion (CSGVI) 20/20035NS,6,1.99V4e:full;14e:35° ctlscotoma 10°ctlscotoma20Superonasal F7P1OS55/FArg212Cys/ Gly863Ala/ Thr959Ile 20/16040NS,3,2.01V4e:10°ctl scotoma;14e:20° ctlscotoma Dense15°ctlscotoma6Superonasal F8P1OS36/MSer336Cys/ Arg1068/Ser‡ 20/20034NS,8,3.62V4e:20°ctl scotoma;14e:25° ctlscotoma Densescotomabeginning 6°superiortofixation 12Superior F9P1OS28/MArg1108His/ Val1433lle 20/32025NS,11,3.30V4e:full;14e:15° scotomafrom5- 25°superiorto fixation Densescotomabeginning 5°superiortofixation 23Superior F10P1OS55/FIVS20ϩ5GϾA splice/Gly1961Glu 20/32025NS,6,2.55V4e:30°ctl scotoma;14e:35° ctlscotoma Densescotomaextending fromfixationto10° inferonasally 19Inferonasal F11P1OS50/MArg2030Gln20/2580Tritan,7,2.61V4e:full;14e:25° ctlscotomafrom 10-25°with fovealsparing Densescotomaextending fromfixationto10° withfovealsparing 27Foveal ctl,central;F,family;F,female;M,male;NS,nonspecificorientation;OD,righteye;OS,lefteye;P,proband. Login to comment

[hide] Molecular analysis of the ABCA4 gene for reliable ... Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):614-21. Epub 2008 Nov 21. Aguirre-Lamban J, Riveiro-Alvarez R, Maia-Lopes S, Cantalapiedra D, Vallespin E, Avila-Fernandez A, Villaverde-Montero C, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Ramos C, Ayuso C
Molecular analysis of the ABCA4 gene for reliable detection of allelic variations in Spanish patients: identification of 21 novel variants.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):614-21. Epub 2008 Nov 21., [PMID:19028736]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mutations in ABCA4 have been associated with autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (STGD), a few cases with autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy (arCRD) and autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (arRP). The purpose of the study was threefold: to molecularly characterise families with no mutations or partially characterised families; to determine the specificity and sensitivity of the genotyping microarray; and to evaluate the efficiency of different methodologies. METHODS: 23 STGD, five arCRD and three arRP Spanish patients who were previously analysed with the ABCR400 microarray were re-evaluated. Results were confirmed by direct sequencing. In patients with either none or only one mutant allele, ABCA4 was further analysed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Haplotype analysis was also performed. RESULTS: In the first analysis performed with the microarray, 27 ABCA4 variants (27/62; 43.5%) were found. By dHPLC scanning, 12 novel mutations were additionally identified. In addition, two previously described mutations, one false negative (1/62; 1.6%) and one false positive (1.6%), were detected. MLPA analysis did not reveal additional substitutions. The new strategy yielded an increment of 21% compared with the approach used in the first round. CONCLUSION: ABCA4 should be analysed by optimal combination of high-throughput screening techniques such as microarray, dHPLC and direct sequencing. To the best of our knowledge, this strategy yielded significant mutational spectrum identification in Spanish patients with ABCA4-associated phenotypes. Follow-up of patients, presenting an early onset of the disease and severe mutations, seems essential to perform accurate genotype-phenotype correlations and further characterisation of pathological ABCA4 alleles.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
80 Clinical science Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:614-621. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.145193 Table 1 Clinical findings of the Spanish patients with Stargardt disease (STGD), autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy and autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Pedigree Age (years) Age (years) of onset Visual acuity Diagnosis Allele 1 Allele 2 Segregation OD OS Nucleotide changes (exons) Amino acid change Nucleotide changes (exons) Amino acid change ARDM-135 42 24 0.4 0.6 STGD c.5882G.A(42) p.Gly1961Glu c.1029_1030insT(8) p.Asn344fsX NP ARDM-240 15 13 0.2 0.16 STGD c.5882G.A(42) p.Gly1961Glu c.2285C.A(15) p.Ala762Glu Yes ARDM-225 32 25 0.25 0.50 STGD c.5882G.A(42) p.Gly1961Glu c.6559C.T(48) p.Gln2187X Yes ARDM-164 21 11 NA STGD c.3386G.T(23) p.Arg1129Leu c.700C.T(6) p.Gln234X Yes ARDM-162 50 16 0.1 0.1 STGD c.3386G.T(23) p.Arg1129Leu ND ND Yes ARDM-198 27 19 0.1 0.1 STGD c.3386G.T(23) p.Arg1129Leu ND ND NP ARDM-125 31 9 0.3 0.4 STGD c.3211insGT(22) FS p.KNLFA1876dup Yes ARDM-158 24 9 0.2 0.2 STGD c.3211insGT(22) FS c.4537delC(30) p.Gln1513fsX1525 NP ARDM-165 40 30 NA STGD c.3211insGT(22) FS ND ND NP ARDM-167 49 23 0.05 0.05 STGD c.3211insGT(22) FS ND ND NP ARDM-146 32 13 0.06 0.1 STGD c.3056C.T(21) p.Thr1019Met c.6140T.A(44) p.Ile2047Asn Yes ARDM-40 46 9 0.1 0.1 STGD c.3056C.T(21) p.Thr1019Met c.3943C.T(27) p.Gln1315X Yes ARDM-90 26 8 Hand moving STGD c.5929G.A (43) p.Gly1977Ser IVS21-2A.T Yes ARDM-181 57 16 0.1 0.09 STGD c.3323G.A (22) p.Arg1108His IVS38+5G.A Yes ARDM-197 35 15 0.1 0.1 STGD c.4793C.A(34) (false +) p.Ala1598Asp (false +) c.5172G.T(36) p.Trp1724Cys Yes ARDM-183 63 55 0.150 0.175 STGD c.6079C.T(44) p.Leu2027Phe c.5929G.A(43) (false -) p.Gly1977Ser (false -) NP ARDM-38 35 6 0.01 0.02 STGD c.1804C.T(13) p.Arg602Trp c.4739delT(33) p.Leu1580fs Yes ARDM-163 48 32 0.01 0.32 STGD c.4457C.T(30) p.Pro1486Leu ND ND Yes ARDM-166 42 39 NA STGD c.6320G.A(46) p.Arg2107His ND ND Yes ARDM-222 26 23 NA STGD c.2791G.A(19) p.Val931Met ND ND NP ARDM-160 30 5 0.25 0.1 STGD ND ND ND ND Yes ARDM-173 49 7 NA STGD ND ND ND ND Yes ARDM-205 NA NA NA STGD c.4919G.A(35) p.Arg1640Gln ND ND NP ARDM-247 30 12 0.05 0.1 CRD c.3386G.T(23) p.Arg1129Leu c.6410G.A(47) p.Cys2137Tyr Yes ARDM-99 59 46 0.05 0.05 CRD c.4297G.A(29) p.Val1433Ile ND ND NP ARDM-131 27 15 0.9 0.7 CRD c.2701A.G(18) p.Thr901Ala ND ND Yes ARDM-100 28 4 0.2 0.16 CRD ND ND ND ND Yes ARDM-142 30 25 0.8 0.5 CRD ND ND ND ND Yes RP-773 38 20 0.05 0.05 RP c.33N86G.T(23) p.Arg1129Leu ND ND NP RP-959 53 10 0.1 0.1 RP c.466A.G(5) p.Ile156Val ND ND Yes RP-1058 37 6 0.2 0.6 RP c.4297G.A(29) p.Val1433Ile ND ND NP Twenty-seven out of 31 subjects were found to be compound heterozygous for mutations in the ABCA4 gene detected by microarray. Login to comment

[hide] ABCA4 mutations causing mislocalization are found ... Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Oct 1;14(19):2769-78. Epub 2005 Aug 15. Wiszniewski W, Zaremba CM, Yatsenko AN, Jamrich M, Wensel TG, Lewis RA, Lupski JR
ABCA4 mutations causing mislocalization are found frequently in patients with severe retinal dystrophies.
Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Oct 1;14(19):2769-78. Epub 2005 Aug 15., [PMID:16103129]

Abstract [show]
ABCA4, also called ABCR, is a retinal-specific member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family that functions in photoreceptor outer segments as a flipase of all-trans retinal. Homozygous and compound heterozygous ABCA4 mutations are associated with various autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies, whereas heterozygous ABCA4 mutations have been associated with dominant susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration in both humans and mice. We analyzed a cohort of 29 arRP families for the mutations in ABCA4 with a commercial microarray, ABCR-400 in addition to direct sequencing and segregation analysis, and identified both mutant alleles in two families (7%): compound heterozygosity for missense (R602W) and nonsense (R408X) alleles and homozygosity for a complex [L541P; A1038V] allele. The missense mutations were analyzed functionally in the photoreceptors of Xenopus laevis tadpoles, which revealed mislocalization of ABCA4 protein. These mutations cause retention of ABCA4 in the photoreceptor inner segment, likely by impairing correct folding, resulting in the total absence of physiologic protein function. Patients with different retinal dystrophies harboring two misfolding alleles exhibit early age-of-onset (AO) (5-12 years) of retinal disease. Our data suggest that a class of ABCA4 mutants may be an important determinant of the AO of disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
146 Genotype-phenotype correlations among patients bearing one and two mislocalization-mutations Two mislocalization-alleles One mislocalization-allele RP STGD Allele 1 Allele 2 AO Allele 1 Allele 2 AO [L541P; A1038V] [L541P; A1038V] 7 [L541P; A1038V] L2027F 13 [L541P; A1038V] [L541P; A1038V] 9 [L541P; A1038V] R1108H 13 [L541P; A1038V] G1961E 16 CRD [L541P; A1038V] G1961E 28 Allele 1 Allele 2 AO [L541P; A1038V] L2027F 13 [L541P; A1038V] [L541P; A1038V] 10 [L541P; A1038V] L2027F 12 [L541P; A1038V] C1490Y 12 [L541P; A1038V] P1380L 5 R602W R602W 7 [L541P; A1038V] T1019M 6 [L541P; A1038V] G1961E 7 STGD [L541P; A1038V] T1019M 6 Allele 1 Allele 2 AO R602W L2027F 9 [L541P; A1038V] [L541P; A1038V] 12 C1490Y G1961E 28 C1490Y C1490Y 7 C1490Y G1961E 13 C1490Y R602W 9 C1490Y L2027F 10 C1490Y R602W 10 C1490Y L2027F 18 C1490 L2027F 18 AO-age of onset (in years). Login to comment

[hide] An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89. Webster AR, Heon E, Lotery AJ, Vandenburgh K, Casavant TL, Oh KT, Beck G, Fishman GA, Lam BL, Levin A, Heckenlively JR, Jacobson SG, Weleber RG, Sheffield VC, Stone EM
An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89., [PMID:11328725]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess the allelic variation of the ATP-binding transporter protein (ABCA4). METHODS: A combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and automated DNA sequencing was used to systematically screen this gene for sequence variations in 374 unrelated probands with a clinical diagnosis of Stargardt disease, 182 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 96 normal subjects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of any single variant or class of variant between the control and AMD groups. In contrast, truncating variants, amino acid substitutions, synonymous codon changes, and intronic variants were significantly enriched in patients with Stargardt disease when compared with their presence in subjects without Stargardt disease (Kruskal-Wallis P < 0.0001 for each variant group). Overall, there were 2480 instances of 213 different variants in the ABCA4 gene, including 589 instances of 97 amino acid substitutions, and 45 instances of 33 truncating variants. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 97 amino acid substitutions, 11 occurred at a frequency that made them unlikely to be high-penetrance recessive disease-causing variants (HPRDCV). After accounting for variants in cis, one or more changes that were compatible with HPRDCV were found on 35% of all Stargardt-associated alleles overall. The nucleotide diversity of the ABCA4 coding region, a collective measure of the number and prevalence of polymorphic sites in a region of DNA, was found to be 1.28, a value that is 9 to 400 times greater than that of two other macular disease genes that were examined in a similar fashion (VMD2 and EFEMP1).

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
102 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 2 160 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 Ͻ0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4353 - 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4539 ϩ 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 Ͻ0.01 39 5584 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5714 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu Ͻ0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 Ͻ0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 Ͻ0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 Ͻ0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6729 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment
103 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 2 160 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 b0d;0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4353 afa; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4539 af9; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 b0d;0.01 39 5584 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5714 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu b0d;0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 b0d;0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 b0d;0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 b0d;0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6729 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment

[hide] A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinica... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15. Fujinami K, Lois N, Davidson AE, Mackay DS, Hogg CR, Stone EM, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Bunce C, Robson AG, Moore AT, Webster AR, Holder GE, Michaelides M
A longitudinal study of stargardt disease: clinical and electrophysiologic assessment, progression, and genotype correlations.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1075-1088.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 15., [PMID:23499370]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic natural history of Stargardt disease and correlate with the genotype. DESIGN: Cohort study of 59 patients. METHODS: Clinical history, examination, and electrophysiologic assessment were undertaken in a longitudinal survey. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on electrophysiologic findings, as previously published: Group 1 had dysfunction confined to the macula; Group 2 had macular and generalized cone system dysfunction; and Group 3 had macular and both generalized cone and rod system dysfunction. At baseline, there were 27 patients in Group 1, 17 in Group 2, and 15 in Group 3. Amplitude reduction of >50% in the relevant electroretinogram (ERG) component or a peak time shift of >3 ms for the 30 Hz flicker ERG or bright flash a-wave was considered clinically significant ERG deterioration. Molecular screening of ABCA4 was undertaken. RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 31.7 years, with the mean follow-up interval being 10.5 years. A total of 22% of patients from Group 1 showed ERG group transition during follow-up, with 11% progressing to Group 2 and 11% to Group 3. Forty-seven percent of patients in Group 2 progressed to Group 3. There was clinically significant ERG deterioration in 54% of all subjects: 22% of Group 1, 65% of Group 2, and 100% of Group 3. At least 1 disease-causing ABCA4 variant was identified in 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with initial rod ERG involvement demonstrated clinically significant electrophysiologic deterioration; only 20% of patients with normal full-field ERGs at baseline showed clinically significant progression. Such data assist counseling by providing more accurate prognostic information and are also highly relevant in the design, patient selection, and monitoring of potential therapeutic interventions.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
108 Clinical Data and Molecular Genetic Status of 59 Patients With Stargardt Disease (Continued) Pt Onset (y) Age (y) logMAR VA Variants Identifieda BL FU BL FU 52 11 31 42 1.3/1.3 2.0/2.0 p.Arg1108His 53 5 32 43 2.0/2.0 2.0/2.0 c.5461-10 T>C / p.Cys2150Tyr 54 5 32 43 2.0/2.0 2.0/2.0 c.5461-10 T>C / p.Cys2150Tyr 55 7 36 47 1.3/1.3 3.0/1.3 c.5461-10 T>C / p.Cys2150Tyr 56 13 39 50 1.25/1.56 3.0/3.0 ND 57 23 42 52 1.56/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Leu747Cysfs*787 58 40 43 54 0.18/0.18 0.78/0.78 ND 59 23 54 65 0.78/1.0 1.0/1.0 p.Ile156Val BL &#bc; baseline; FU &#bc; follow-up; logMAR &#bc; logarithm of minimal angle of resolution; ND &#bc; not detected; Pt &#bc; patient; VA &#bc; visual acuity. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disea... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003. Fujinami K, Sergouniotis PI, Davidson AE, Wright G, Chana RK, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Egan CA, Robson AG, Moore AT, Holder GE, Michaelides M, Webster AR
Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disease with preserved foveal structure and function.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003., [PMID:23953153]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease who show a foveal-sparing phenotype. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The foveal-sparing phenotype was defined as foveal preservation on autofluorescence imaging, despite a retinopathy otherwise consistent with Stargardt disease. Forty such individuals were ascertained and a full ophthalmic examination was undertaken. Following mutation screening of ABCA4, the molecular findings were compared with those of patients with Stargardt disease but no foveal sparing. RESULTS: The median age of onset and age at examination of 40 patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype were 43.5 and 46.5 years. The median logMAR visual acuity was 0.18. Twenty-two patients (22/40, 55%) had patchy parafoveal atrophy and flecks; 8 (20%) had numerous flecks at the posterior pole without atrophy; 7 (17.5%) had mottled retinal pigment epithelial changes; 2 (5%) had multiple atrophic lesions, extending beyond the arcades; and 1 (2.5%) had a bull's-eye appearance. The median central foveal thickness assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images was 183.0 mum (n = 33), with outer retinal tubulation observed in 15 (45%). Twenty-two of 33 subjects (67%) had electrophysiological evidence of macular dysfunction without generalized retinal dysfunction. Disease-causing variants were found in 31 patients (31/40, 78%). There was a higher prevalence of the variant p.Arg2030Gln in the cohort with foveal sparing compared to the group with foveal atrophy (6.45% vs 1.07%). CONCLUSIONS: The distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype are described. The presence of 2 distinct phenotypes of Stargardt disease (foveal sparing and foveal atrophy) suggests that there may be more than 1 disease mechanism in ABCA4 retinopathy.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
141 Allele Frequencies of 72 ABCA4 Variants Identified in a Comparison Groupa With the Typical Stargardt Disease (140 Patients Without Evidence of Foveal Sparing on Autofluorescence Imaging) Exon Nucleotide Substitution and Amino Acid Change Number of Alleles Allele Frequency 2 c.71G>A, p.Arg24His 1 0.36% 2 c.161G>A, p.Cys54Tyr 3 1.07% 3 c.223T>G, p.Cys75Gly 1 0.36% 5 c.455G>A, p.Arg152Gln 1 0.36% 5 c.454C>T, p.Arg152* 1 0.36% 5 c.466 A>G, p.Ile156Val 2 0.71% 6 c.634C>T, p. Arg212Cys 3 1.07% 6 c.656G>C, p.Arg219Thr 1 0.36% 6 c.666_678delAAAGACGGTGCGC, p.Lys223_Arg226delfs 2 0.71% 6 c.768G>T, Splicing site 4 1.42% 8 c.1037A>C, p.Lys346Thr 1 0.36% 10 c.1222C>T, p.Arg408* 3 1.07% 12 c.1622T>C, p.Leu541Pro 2 0.71% 12 c.1648 G>T, p.Gly550* 1 0.36% 13 c.1804C>T, p.Arg602Trp 1 0.36% 13 c.1817G>A, p.Gly606Asp 1 0.36% 13 c.1922G>C, p.Cys641Ser 1 0.36% Int 13 c.1937&#fe;1G>A, Splicing site 2 0.71% 14 c.1957C>T, p.Arg653Cys 2 0.71% 17 c.2588G>C, p.Gly863Ala 19 6.79% 18 c.2701A>G, p.Thr901Ala 1 0.36% 19 c.2791G>A, p.Val931Met 2 0.71% 19 c.2894A>G, p.Asn965Ser 1 0.36% 20 c.2966T>C, p.Vla989Ala 3 1.07% 20 c.2971G>C, p.Gly991Arg 2 0.71% 21 c.3056C>T, p.Thr1019Met 1 0.36% 21 c.3113C>T, p.Ala1038Val 3 1.07% 21 c.3064G>A, p.Glu1022Lys 2 0.71% 22 c.3211_3212insGT, p.Ser1071Cysfs 6 2.14% 22 c.3259G>A, p.Glu1087Lys 4 1.43% 22 c.3292C>T, p.Arg1098Cys 1 0.36% 22 c.3322C>T, p.Arg1108Cys 5 1.79% 22 c.3323G>A, p.Arg1108His 1 0.36% 23 c.3364G>A, p.Glu1122Lys 1 0.36% 23 c.3386G>A, p.Arg1129His 1 0.36% 24 c.3602T>G, p.Leu1201Arg 3 1.07% 27 c.3898C>T, p.Arg1300* 2 0.71% 28 c.4139C>T, p.Pro1380Leu 14 5.00% 28 c.4222T>C, p.Trp1408Arg 1 0.36% 28 c.4234C>T, p.Gly1412* 1 0.36% 28 c.4253&#fe;5G>T, Splice site 1 0.36% 28 c.4253&#fe;4C>T, Splice site 1 0.36% 29 c.4283C>T, p.Thr1428Met 1 0.36% 29 c.4319T>C, p.Phe1440Ser 1 0.36% 29 c.4462T>C, p.Cys1488Arg 1 0.36% 30 c.4469G>A, p.Cys1490Tyr 5 1.79% 30 c.4537_4538insC, p.Gly1513Profs 1 0.36% 31 c.4577C>T, p.Thr1526Met 2 0.71% 33 c.4715C>T, p.Thr1572Met 1 0.36% Continued on next page TABLE 3. Login to comment

[hide] Distinct characteristics of inferonasal fundus aut... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 17;54(10):6820-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12895. Duncker T, Lee W, Tsang SH, Greenberg JP, Zernant J, Allikmets R, Sparrow JR
Distinct characteristics of inferonasal fundus autofluorescence patterns in stargardt disease and retinitis pigmentosa.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 17;54(10):6820-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12895., [PMID:24071957]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To report distinct characteristics of fundus autofluorescence (AF) patterns inferior to the optic disc in recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS: Short-wavelength (SW) and near-infrared (NIR) AF images were acquired from patients with STGD1 and RP. In SW- and NIR-AF images of STGD1 patients, gray levels (GL) on both sides of the demarcation line were measured. RESULTS: In STGD1, a demarcation line, which has been assigned to the closed optic fissure, was visible on SW-AF and NIR-AF inferior to the optic disc. In healthy subjects, this demarcation line is only visible by SW-AF. At 20 degrees inferior to the disc center, AF levels on the nasal side were 25% (+/-11%) lower than on the temporal side in SW-AF images and 18% (+/-11%) lower in NIR-AF images. For both STGD1 and RP, the inferonasal quadrant exhibited distinct SW- and NIR-AF patterns compared with other fundus areas. Disease-related AF changes, such as flecks, appeared to respect the demarcation line as a boundary. CONCLUSIONS: Disease-related AF patterns originating in RPE in STGD1 and RP appear to respect the demarcation line in the inferonasal quadrant of the fundus as a border. The visibility of the inferonasal demarcation line by NIR-AF in STGD1 but not in healthy eyes may indicate that increased levels of RPE lipofuscin modulate the melanin-related NIR-AF signal. This feature of NIR-AF images may aid in the diagnosis of STGD1 patients.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
51 Summary of Demographic, Clinical, and Genetic Data Patient Condition ABCA4 Mutations Sex Age, y Eye Iris Color Race/Ethnicity BCVA Snellen (logMAR) P1 STGD1 p.P1380L, p.G1961E M 12 OS Blue White 20/100 (0.70) P2 STGD1 p.P1380L, p.G1961E F 17 OS Brown White 20/150 (0.88) P3 STGD1 p.Q1003X, p.G1961E M 25 OS Brown White 20/40 (0.30) P4 STGD1 p.C54Y F 48 OD Blue White 20/30 (0.20) P5 STGD1 p.R2077W F 52 OD Blue White 20/40 (0.30) P6 STGD1 p.[L541P;A1038V] M 13 OS Brown White 20/150 (0.88) P7 STGD1 p.T972N, p.L2027F F 14 OS Blue White 20/80 (0.60) P8 STGD1 c.4537_4538insC, p.V1686M M 49 OS Brown White 20/50 (0.40) P9 STGD1 p.R1108H, p.P1380L M 50 OS Blue White 20/200 (1.00) P10 STGD1 c.5714&#fe;5G>A F 34 OD Blue White 20/200 (1.00) P11 STGD1 p.Q636H, p.G1961E M 46 OD Brown Indian 20/400 (1.30) P12 STGD1 c.5461-10T>C M 35 OD Brown Black 20/400 (1.30) P13 STGD1 p.R1640W F 20 OD Brown Black 20/125 (0.80) P14 STGD1 p.R290W M 47 OS Brown White 20/40 (0.30) P15 STGD1 p.A1773V, p.G1961E M 18 OD Brown White 20/150 (0.88) P16 AD RP p.T17M* F 23 OD Brown Hispanic 20/30 (0.20) P17 AD RP N/A M 39 OS Brown White 20/20 (0.00) P18 AR RP N/A M 50 OS Green White 20/20 (0.00) AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; F, female; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; M, male; N/A, not available. Login to comment

[hide] Quantitative fundus autofluorescence in recessive ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 1;55(5):2841-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13624. Burke TR, Duncker T, Woods RL, Greenberg JP, Zernant J, Tsang SH, Smith RT, Allikmets R, Sparrow JR, Delori FC
Quantitative fundus autofluorescence in recessive Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 1;55(5):2841-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13624., [PMID:24677105]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To quantify fundus autofluorescence (qAF) in patients with recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). METHODS: A total of 42 STGD1 patients (ages: 7-52 years) with at least one confirmed disease-associated ABCA4 mutation were studied. Fundus AF images (488-nm excitation) were acquired with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope equipped with an internal fluorescent reference to account for variable laser power and detector sensitivity. The gray levels (GLs) of each image were calibrated to the reference, zero GL, magnification, and normative optical media density to yield qAF. Texture factor (TF) was calculated to characterize inhomogeneities in the AF image and patients were assigned to the phenotypes of Fishman I through III. RESULTS: Quantified fundus autofluorescence in 36 of 42 patients and TF in 27 of 42 patients were above normal limits for age. Young patients exhibited the relatively highest qAF, with levels up to 8-fold higher than healthy eyes. Quantified fundus autofluorescence and TF were higher in Fishman II and III than Fishman I, who had higher qAF and TF than healthy eyes. Patients carrying the G1916E mutation had lower qAF and TF than most other patients, even in the presence of a second allele associated with severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: Quantified fundus autofluorescence is an indirect approach to measuring RPE lipofuscin in vivo. We report that ABCA4 mutations cause significantly elevated qAF, consistent with previous reports indicating that increased RPE lipofuscin is a hallmark of STGD1. Even when qualitative differences in fundus AF images are not evident, qAF can elucidate phenotypic variation. Quantified fundus autofluorescence will serve to establish genotype-phenotype correlations and as an outcome measure in clinical trials.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
84 [A854T; A1038V]; p.C2150Y 512 2.3 26 F 52 1 0.70 0.48 I - p.R212C 722 2.0 27 F 52 13 1.00 1.00 - I p.A1038V; p.A848D 459 4.1 28 M 20 5 0.30 0.40 I - p.L2027F; p.R1108H 507 2.3 29 M 23 7 1.00 1.00 I I p.G1961E; p.R2030Q 334 347 2.4 2.0 30 M 44 26 0.70 0.70 - II p.P1380L; p.R1108H 453 4.7 31 F 30 22 1.00 1.30 - I p.G1961E; c.6005&#fe;1G > T 428 2.3 32 M 12 8 0.40 0.40 I - p.W821R; p.C2150Y 306 2.0 33 F 20 9 0.88 0.88 III III p.R602W; p.M1882I 650 655 2.6 2.5 34 F 47 4 0.40 0.40 I - p.G1961E; p.R1129C 400 2.5 35 F 19 3 0.70 0.48 II II p. Login to comment