ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Thr897Ile

ClinVar:	c.2690C>T , p.Thr897Ile ? , not provided
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: N (82%), C: N (82%), D: N (72%), E: D (59%), F: N (66%), G: N (78%), H: N (87%), I: D (66%), K: N (87%), L: N (78%), M: N (82%), N: N (87%), P: N (78%), Q: N (82%), R: N (82%), S: N (93%), V: N (82%), W: D (59%), Y: N (72%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: N, C: N, D: N, E: N, F: N, G: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, V: N, W: N, Y: N,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Lipofuscin- and melanin-related fundus autofluores... Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;147(5):895-902, 902.e1. Epub 2009 Feb 25. Kellner S, Kellner U, Weber BH, Fiebig B, Weinitz S, Ruether K
Lipofuscin- and melanin-related fundus autofluorescence in patients with ABCA4-associated retinal dystrophies.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;147(5):895-902, 902.e1. Epub 2009 Feb 25., [PMID:19243736]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To compare melanin-related near-infrared fundus autofluorescence (NIA; excitation 787 nm, emission > 800 nm) to lipofuscin-related fundus autofluorescence (FAF; excitation 488 nm, emission > 500 nm) in patients with retinal dystrophies associated with ABCA4 gene mutations (ABCA4-RD). DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients with ABCA4-RD diagnosed in one institution were included. FAF and NIA imaging were performed with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (Heidelberg Retina Angiograph 2; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). The pattern and size of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) alterations detected with FAF and NIA were evaluated. RESULTS: FAF and NIA alterations were detected in all patients. In 7 of 16 patients, the alterations progressed beyond the vascular arcades, and in 9 of 16, they were confined to the macula. Spots of increased NIA (4/16) were less frequent compared with spots of increased FAF (15/16). Confluent patches of reduced NIA were frequent (12/16), and severely reduced NIA was observed in 3 cases. Areas with reduced NIA corresponded to either increased or reduced FAF. Preservation of subfoveal FAF or NIA corresponded to visual acuity > or = 0.4. Abnormalities detected with NIA were more extensive or more severe compared to FAF in 15 of 16 patients. CONCLUSION: Patterns of FAF and NIA indicate different involvement of lipofuscin and melanin and their derivates in the pathophysiologic process of ABCA4-RD. NIA imaging provides a noninvasive in vivo visualization of RPE abnormalities that may precede FAF alterations during the degenerative process. Combined FAF and NIA imaging will provide further insight in the development of ABCA4-RD and could help to monitor future therapeutic interventions.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
32 Age Gender ABCA4 Mutation VA RE/LE Full-field ERG Multifocal ERG Group 1a CRD 2808 34 F c.5413AϾG (p.Asn1805Asp) c.4880_4903dup24 (p.Leu1627_Ala1634dup) 0.05 0.05 DA and LA markedly reduced No recordable potentials CRD 2830 53 F c.2690CϾT (p.Thr897Ile), c.6176GϾC (p.Gly2059Ala) 0.5 0.7 DA and LA moderately reduced Pericentral amplitude reduction CRD 2797 54 M c.4297GϾA (p.Val1433Ile) 2. mutation not foundc 0.1 0.16 DA and LA moderately reduced Not done SD 2872 44 F c.4462TϾC (p.Cys1488Arg) 2. mutation not done 0.6 0.7 DA and LA borderline Central amplitude reduction CRD 2861 72 F c.122GϾA (p.Trp41Ter) 2. mutation not done 0.4 0.5 DA: mildly and LA: moderately reduced Central amplitude reduction CRD 2644 67 F c.634CϾT (p.Arg212Cys), c.656GϾC (p.Arg219Thr), c.2588GϾC (p.Gly863Ala/ delGly863) 0.6 0.04 DA and LA moderately reduced Central amplitude reduction CRD 2936 44 F c.1622TϾC (p.Leu541Pro)/ c.3113CϾT (p.Ala1038Val), 2. mutation not done 1.0 1.0 DA: mildly and LA: moderately reduced Pericentral amplitude reduction Group 2b SD 2837 42 M c.1622TϾC (p.Leu541Pro)/ c.3113CϾT (p.Ala1038Val), c.5882GϾA (p.Gly1961Glu) 0.16 0.16 Normal Central amplitude reduction SD 2780 37 M c.768GϾT (splice mutation) c.5882GϾA (p.Gly1961Glu) 0.1 0.1 Normal Central amplitude reduction SD 2942 47 F c.1622TϾC (p.Leu541Pro) c.6320 GϾA (p.Arg2107His) 0.1 0.16 Not done Central amplitude reduction SD 2930 40 F c.6089GϾA (p.Arg2030Gln) c.6543del36bp, (p.Leu2182_Phe2193del) 0.1 0.1 DA and LA mildly reduced Central amplitude reduction SD 2933 43 F c.1609CϾT (p.Arg537Cys) c.5882GϾA (p.Gly1961Glu) c.1654GϾA (p.Val552Ile) 0.05 0.1 Normal Not done SD 2669 13 F c.768GϾT (splice mutation) c.6449GϾA (p.Cys2150Tyr) 0.1 0.16 DA and LA borderline Central amplitude reduction SD 2700 22 F c.1609CϾT (p.Arg537Cys) c.2588GϾC (p.Gly863Ala) 0.1 0.1 Normal Central amplitude reduction SD 2833 29 M c.1928TϾG (p.Val643Gly) 2. mutation not foundc 0.1 0.1 Normal Not done SD 2799 13 M c.3113CϾT (p.Ala1038Val) c.5461-10TϾC 0.4 0.4 Not done Central amplitude reduction CRD ϭ cone-rod dystrophy; DA ϭ dark adaptation; ERG ϭ electroretinography; F ϭ female; LA ϭ light adaptation; LE ϭ left eye; M ϭ male; RE ϭ right eye; SD ϭ Stargardt disease; VA ϭ visual acuity. Login to comment

[hide] Pseudo-vitelliform macular detachment and cuticula... Ophthalmic Genet. 2007 Dec;28(4):192-7. Barbazetto IA, Yannuzzi NA, Klais CM, Merriam JE, Zernant J, Peiretti E, Yannuzzi LA, Allikmets R
Pseudo-vitelliform macular detachment and cuticular drusen: exclusion of 6 candidate genes.
Ophthalmic Genet. 2007 Dec;28(4):192-7., [PMID:18161617]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: The etiology and genetic cause of pseudo-vitelliform macular detachment with cuticular drusen (PVMD/CD) are unknown; nor is it clear if this phenotype represents a separate disease entity, or is a sub-phenotype of disorders with overlapping clinical presentation. To answer this question, we screened a cohort of patients affected with PVMD/CD for variation in six plausible candidate genes (ABCA4, VMD2, TIMP-3, peripherin/RDS, fibulin 5 (FIBL5) and complement factor H (CFH)) associated with diseases of overlapping phenotypes. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients, diagnosed with pseudo-vitelliform macular detachment and cuticular drusen, were evaluated by clinical examination, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography and autofluorescence imaging. DNA from all study subjects were screened for variants in the ABCA4, VMD2, TIMP-3, peripherin/RDS, FIBL5 and CFH genes by a combination of DHPLC, array screening and direct sequencing. RESULTS: All patients presented with cuticular drusen; pseudo-vitelliform detachment was seen in 21 cases, while atrophic changes following regression of the detachment were seen in the remaining 7 subjects. Visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to CF. The screening revealed an I32V mutation in peripherin/RDS in one patient and 2ABCA4 variants, T897I and G1961E, in 2 more patients. No amino acid-altering variants were detected in VMD2, TIMP-3, and FIBL5 genes. The frequency of the CFH Y402H variant in this cohort corresponded to that detected in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of 6 candidate genes detected possibly disease-associated mutations in only 3/28 (10.7%) of patients presenting with PVMD/CD, eliminating these genes as causal for this phenotype.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
6 The screening revealed an I32V mutation in peripherin/RDS in one patient and 2 ABCA4 variants, T897I and G1961E, in 2 more patients. Login to comment
42 Thecompletescreeningofthe5candidategenesin28patients revealed the I32V mutation in peripherin /RDS in one patient and 2 ABCA4 variants, T897I and G1961E, in 2 more patients. Login to comment
49 The right eye (C) reveals a plaque-like area of pigmentary changes in the center of the macula after previous PDT treatment; patient #10 (E, F) carrying the ABCA4 T897I mutation. Login to comment
52 Sex Age CHF genotype Other mutations VA OD VA OS Drusen type Hyper Hypo CNV GA Pseudo 1 F 81 CT 20/25 20/40 C, SI y y y 2 M 76 CT 20/80 20/20 C, SI y n y 3 F 49 CT 20/25 20/30 C n n n 4 F 72 CT RDS I32V 20/50 20/20 C n n y 5 M 54 TT ABCA4 G1961E 20/80 20/50 C, SI y n n 6 M 52 TT 20/150 20/20 C y y y 7 M 76 TT 20/80 20/100 C, R y y y 8 M 76 CT 10/400 20/100 C, SI y y n 9 F 60 CT 20/20 20/50 C, SI y y y 10 F 83 CC ABCA4 T897I 20/30 20/60 C, SI n n y 11 F 60 TT 20/30 20/30 C n n y 12 F 78 TT 20/30 20/80 C, SI y y y 13 F 40 CT 20/40 20/20 C, SI y y y 14 F 65 CT 20/30 20/80 C y y y 15 M 73 TT 20/30 20/40 C, SI y y y 16 F 49 CC 20/50 20/50 C, SI y y y 17 M 91 CC 20/200 20/30 C, SI y y y 18 F 79 CC 20/30 20/30 C n n y 19 M 41 CT 20/25 20/25 C n y n 20 F 64 CT CF 20/25 C, SI y y CNV y 21 F 58 TT 20/40 20/30 C n n n 22 F 61 CT 20/50 20/70 C, SI y y GA y 23 F 80 CT 20/20 20/40 C, SI y y n 24 F 79 CT 20/60 20/30 C, SI n y y 25 F 77 CT 20/80 20/40 C, SI y y y 26 F 46 CT 20/30 20/40 C, SI y y n 27 F 74 TT 20/40 20/80 C, SI n y y 28 M 73 CT 20/60 20/400 C n y y VA-visual acuity. Login to comment

[hide] Denaturing HPLC profiling of the ABCA4 gene for re... Clin Chem. 2004 Aug;50(8):1336-43. Epub 2004 Jun 10. Stenirri S, Fermo I, Battistella S, Galbiati S, Soriani N, Paroni R, Manitto MP, Martina E, Brancato R, Allikmets R, Ferrari M, Cremonesi L
Denaturing HPLC profiling of the ABCA4 gene for reliable detection of allelic variations.
Clin Chem. 2004 Aug;50(8):1336-43. Epub 2004 Jun 10., [PMID:15192030]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Mutations in the retina-specific ABC transporter (ABCA4) gene have been associated with several forms of macular degenerations. Because the high complexity of the molecular genotype makes scanning of the ABCA4 gene cumbersome, we describe here the first use of denaturing HPLC (DHPLC) to screen for ABCA4 mutations. METHODS: Temperature conditions were designed for all 50 exons based on effective separation of 83 samples carrying 86 sequence variations and 19 mutagenized controls. For validation, samples from 23 previously characterized Stargardt patients were subjected to DHPLC profiling. Subsequently, samples from a cohort of 30 patients affected by various forms of macular degeneration were subjected to DHPLC scanning under the same conditions. RESULTS: DHPLC profiling not only identified all 132 sequence alterations previously detected by double-gradient denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis but also identified 5 sequence alterations that this approach had missed. Moreover, DHPLC scanning of an additional panel of 30 previously untested patients led to the identification of 26 different mutations and 29 polymorphisms, accounting for 203 sequence variations on 29 of the 30 patients screened. In total, the DHPLC approach allowed us to identify 16 mutations that had never been reported before. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide strong support for the use of DHPLC for molecular characterization of the ABCA4 gene.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
35 Exon Genotypesa Exon Genotypesa 1b M1V (1A>G) (11) 24 3523-28TϾC (12) R18W (52C>T) (11) 25 G1203D (3608G>A)b 3 250_251insCAAA (7) 27 R1300X (3898C>T) (12) N96K (288C>A) R1300Q (3899G>A) (11) 302 ϩ 26 GϾA (13) 28 P1380L (4139CϾT) (14) 4 P143L (428C>T) (10) P1401P (4203CϾA) (15) 5 R152Q (455G>A) (4) 4253 ϩ 43GϾA (12) 6 571-1GϾT (4) 29 4253 ϩ 13GϾA (12) R212H (635G>A) (16) 4354-38GϾA (4) C230S (688T>A) (12) 30a 4466 ϩ 3GϾA (4) 641delG (9) 30b C1490Y (4469G>A) (17) 10 1240-14CϾT (13) P1512R (4535C>G) (4) H423R (1268ϾG) (13) 31 T1526M (4577C>T) (14) 1357 ϩ 11delG (16) 33/34 A1598D (4793C>A) (4) H423H (1269CϾT) (13) 35 4947delC (14) 11 1387delTT (4) 5018 ؉ 2T>C (7) R500R (1500GϾA) (4) 39 H1838Y (5512C>T) (14) 12 L541P (1622T>C) (14) 40 N1868I (5603AϾT) (13) R572Q (1715G>A) (17) L1894L (5682GϾC) (15) 13 Y639X (1917C>G) (17) 5714 ؉ 5G>A C641S (1922G>C) (4) 41 L1938L (5814AϾG) (12) 14 R653C (1957C>T) (12) 42 5836-43CϾA W700X (2099G>A) (4) 5836-11GϾA (15) 3607 ϩ 49TϾC P1948I (5843CϾT) (15) 15 V767D (2300T>A) (7) P1948P (5844AϾG) (15) 16 W821R (2461T>A) (14) G1961E (5882G>A) (14) 17 2588-33CϾTb 43 L1970F (5908C>T) (11) G863A (2588G>C) (17) 44 6006-16AϾG (16) 18 2654-36CϾT (4) I2023I (6069CϾT) (14) T897I (2690C>T) (7) L2027F (6079C>T) (14) 19 R943Q (2828GϾA) (13) 45 V2050L (6148G>C) (14) Y954D (2860T>G) (4) 46 R2107H (6320G>A) (18) N965S (2894A>G) (14) 6386 ؉ 2G>C (10) 20 G978D (2933G>A) (4) 47 R2139W (6415C>T) (14) L988L (2964CϾT) (4) R2149L (6446G>T) (4) 21 E1022K (3064G>A) (4) C2150Y (6449G>A) (19) A1038V (3113C>T) (14) 48 D2177N (6529G>A) (17) G1050D (3149G>A) (4) L2241V (6721C>G) (12) 3211_3212insGT (14) 6729 ϩ 21CϾT (15) 22 E1087K (3259G>A) (14) 49 6730-3TϾC (15) R1098C (3292C>T) (12) S2255I (6764GϾT) (13) S1099P (3295T>C) (4) 6816 ϩ 28GϾC (4) R1108C (3322C>T) (14) R1129L (3386G>T) (17) a Bold indicates disease-causing mutations. Login to comment
34 Exon Genotypesa Exon Genotypesa 1b M1V (1A>G) (11) 24 3523-28Tb0e;C (12) R18W (52C>T) (11) 25 G1203D (3608G>A)b 3 250_251insCAAA (7) 27 R1300X (3898C>T) (12) N96K (288C>A) R1300Q (3899G>A) (11) 302 af9; 26 Gb0e;A (13) 28 P1380L (4139Cb0e;T) (14) 4 P143L (428C>T) (10) P1401P (4203Cb0e;A) (15) 5 R152Q (455G>A) (4) 4253 af9; 43Gb0e;A (12) 6 571-1Gb0e;T (4) 29 4253 af9; 13Gb0e;A (12) R212H (635G>A) (16) 4354-38Gb0e;A (4) C230S (688T>A) (12) 30a 4466 af9; 3Gb0e;A (4) 641delG (9) 30b C1490Y (4469G>A) (17) 10 1240-14Cb0e;T (13) P1512R (4535C>G) (4) H423R (1268b0e;G) (13) 31 T1526M (4577C>T) (14) 1357 af9; 11delG (16) 33/34 A1598D (4793C>A) (4) H423H (1269Cb0e;T) (13) 35 4947delC (14) 11 1387delTT (4) 5018 d19; 2T>C (7) R500R (1500Gb0e;A) (4) 39 H1838Y (5512C>T) (14) 12 L541P (1622T>C) (14) 40 N1868I (5603Ab0e;T) (13) R572Q (1715G>A) (17) L1894L (5682Gb0e;C) (15) 13 Y639X (1917C>G) (17) 5714 d19; 5G>A C641S (1922G>C) (4) 41 L1938L (5814Ab0e;G) (12) 14 R653C (1957C>T) (12) 42 5836-43Cb0e;A W700X (2099G>A) (4) 5836-11Gb0e;A (15) 3607 af9; 49Tb0e;C P1948I (5843Cb0e;T) (15) 15 V767D (2300T>A) (7) P1948P (5844Ab0e;G) (15) 16 W821R (2461T>A) (14) G1961E (5882G>A) (14) 17 2588-33Cb0e;Tb 43 L1970F (5908C>T) (11) G863A (2588G>C) (17) 44 6006-16Ab0e;G (16) 18 2654-36Cb0e;T (4) I2023I (6069Cb0e;T) (14) T897I (2690C>T) (7) L2027F (6079C>T) (14) 19 R943Q (2828Gb0e;A) (13) 45 V2050L (6148G>C) (14) Y954D (2860T>G) (4) 46 R2107H (6320G>A) (18) N965S (2894A>G) (14) 6386 d19; 2G>C (10) 20 G978D (2933G>A) (4) 47 R2139W (6415C>T) (14) L988L (2964Cb0e;T) (4) R2149L (6446G>T) (4) 21 E1022K (3064G>A) (4) C2150Y (6449G>A) (19) A1038V (3113C>T) (14) 48 D2177N (6529G>A) (17) G1050D (3149G>A) (4) L2241V (6721C>G) (12) 3211_3212insGT (14) 6729 af9; 21Cb0e;T (15) 22 E1087K (3259G>A) (14) 49 6730-3Tb0e;C (15) R1098C (3292C>T) (12) S2255I (6764Gb0e;T) (13) S1099P (3295T>C) (4) 6816 af9; 28Gb0e;C (4) R1108C (3322C>T) (14) R1129L (3386G>T) (17) a Bold indicates disease-causing mutations. Login to comment

[hide] An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89. Webster AR, Heon E, Lotery AJ, Vandenburgh K, Casavant TL, Oh KT, Beck G, Fishman GA, Lam BL, Levin A, Heckenlively JR, Jacobson SG, Weleber RG, Sheffield VC, Stone EM
An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89., [PMID:11328725]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess the allelic variation of the ATP-binding transporter protein (ABCA4). METHODS: A combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and automated DNA sequencing was used to systematically screen this gene for sequence variations in 374 unrelated probands with a clinical diagnosis of Stargardt disease, 182 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 96 normal subjects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of any single variant or class of variant between the control and AMD groups. In contrast, truncating variants, amino acid substitutions, synonymous codon changes, and intronic variants were significantly enriched in patients with Stargardt disease when compared with their presence in subjects without Stargardt disease (Kruskal-Wallis P < 0.0001 for each variant group). Overall, there were 2480 instances of 213 different variants in the ABCA4 gene, including 589 instances of 97 amino acid substitutions, and 45 instances of 33 truncating variants. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 97 amino acid substitutions, 11 occurred at a frequency that made them unlikely to be high-penetrance recessive disease-causing variants (HPRDCV). After accounting for variants in cis, one or more changes that were compatible with HPRDCV were found on 35% of all Stargardt-associated alleles overall. The nucleotide diversity of the ABCA4 coding region, a collective measure of the number and prevalence of polymorphic sites in a region of DNA, was found to be 1.28, a value that is 9 to 400 times greater than that of two other macular disease genes that were examined in a similar fashion (VMD2 and EFEMP1).

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
102 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 2 160 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 Ͻ0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4353 - 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4539 ϩ 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 Ͻ0.01 39 5584 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5714 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu Ͻ0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 Ͻ0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 Ͻ0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 Ͻ0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6729 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment
103 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 2 160 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 b0d;0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4353 afa; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4539 af9; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 b0d;0.01 39 5584 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5714 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu b0d;0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 b0d;0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 b0d;0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 b0d;0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6729 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment

[hide] New ABCR mutations and clinical phenotype in Itali... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Mar;41(3):892-7. Simonelli F, Testa F, de Crecchio G, Rinaldi E, Hutchinson A, Atkinson A, Dean M, D'Urso M, Allikmets R
New ABCR mutations and clinical phenotype in Italian patients with Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Mar;41(3):892-7., [PMID:10711710]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess the mutation spectrum in the ABCR gene and clinical phenotypes in Italian families with autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) and fundus flavimaculatus (FFM). METHODS: Eleven families from southern Italy, including 18 patients with diagnoses of STGD1, were clinically examined. Ophthalmologic examination included kinetic perimetry, electrophysiological studies, and fluorescein angiography. DNA samples of the affected individuals and their family members were analyzed for variants in all 50 exons of the ABCR gene by a combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and direct sequencing techniques. RESULTS: TenABCR variants were identified in 16 (73%) of 22 mutant alleles of patients with STGD1. Five mutations of 10 that were found had not been previously described. The majority of variants represent missense amino acid substitutions, and all mutant alleles cosegregate with the disease in the respective families. These ABCR variants were not detected in 170 unaffected control individuals (340 chromosomes) of Italian origin. Clinical evaluation of these families affected by STGD1 showed an unusually high frequency of early age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in parents of patients with STGD1 (8/22; 36%), consistent with the hypothesis that some heterozygous ABCR mutations enhance susceptibility to AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients from southern Italy with Stargardt disease show extensive allelic heterogeneity of the ABCR gene, concordant with previous observations in patients with STGD1 from different ethnic groups. Half the mutations identified in this study had not been previously described in patients with STGD1. Screening of increasingly large numbers of patients would help to determine whether this can be explained by ethnic differences, or is an indicator of extensive allelic heterogeneity of ABCR in STGD1 and other eye diseases. In 6 (55%) of 11 families, the first-degree relatives of patients with STGD1 were diagnosed with early AMD, supporting the previous observation that some STGD1 alleles are also associated with AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
55 Clinical Characteristics and Segregation of Mutations in 11 Italian STGD/FFM Pedigrees Pedigree Patients Age Age of Onset Visual Acuity Diagnosis Allele 1 Allele 2 431 431 S 18 10 20/200 STGD R212C R212C 433 D 29 8 20/200 STGD R212C R212C 432 F 63 10 LE 20/40RE LP High myopia with macular involvement R212C R212H(p) 858 Gm 87 10 LP High myopia with macular involvement wt R212H(p) 774 M 60 58 20/25 Pigmentary abnormalities and drusen R212C wt 260 D 41 35 20/200 STGD 250ƒCAAA G1961E 759 S 39 38 20/100 STGD 250ƒCAAA G1961E 760 M 60 57 20/40 Pigmentary abnormalities and drusen wt G1961E 761 Gs 20/20 Normal wt G1961E 762 Gs 20/20 Normal 250ƒCAAA wt 631 631 S 18 3 20/200 STGD / FFM 5018 ϩ 2T 3 C 5018 ϩ 2T 3 C 777 F 59 58 20/20 Soft distinct drusen 5018 ϩ 2T 3 C wt 779 M 52 50 20/20 Hard distinct drusen 5018 ϩ 2T 3 C wt 624 624 D 40 18 20/200 STGD R1640Q G1961E 625 S 36 20 20/200 STGD R1640Q G1961E 834 M 74 20/20 Normal R1640Q wt 636 636 S 22 15 20/400 STGD / FFM E1087K G1961E 778 M 43 43 20/20 Hard distinct drusen wt G1961E 632 632 D 24 8 20/200 STGD / FFM 250ƒCAAA V767D 628 628 S 27 18 20/200 STGD T897I N/D 4 F 63 20/20 Normal wt N/D 5 M 62 62 20/20 Pigmentary abnormalities and drusen T897I N/D 633 633 D 12 8 20/400 STGD / FFM A1038V N/D 776 S 15 20/20 Normal A1038V N/D 634 D 20 10 20/400 STGD / FFM A1038V N/D 3 F 60 60 20/20 Pigmentary abnormalities and drusen wt N/D 2 M 49 20/20 Normal A1038V N/D 615 615 S 22 8 20/200 STGD / FFM 5018 ϩ 2T 3 C N/D 616 D 23 10 20/200 STGD / FFM 5018 ϩ 2T 3 C N/D 764 D 25 20/20 Normal 5018 ϩ 2T 3 C N/D 763 F 60 20/20 Normal 5018 ϩ 2T 3 C N/D 765 M 55 55 20/20 Pigmentary abnormalities and drusen wt N/D 629 629 D 23 10 STGD / FFM E1399K N/D 622 627 D 47 12 20/400 STGD N/D N/D 622 D 35 8 20/400 STGD / FFM N/D N/D 623 C 19 10 20/200 STGD / FFM S, son; D, daughter; F, father; M, mother; C, cousin; Gm, grandmother; Gs, grandson; (p), polymorphism; wt, wild type; N/D, not determined. Login to comment
62 Five mutations were unique for this study: missense changes V767D (exon 15), T897I (exon 18), E1399K (exon 28), insertion of four nucleotides CAAA at position 250 in exon 3, and a splice site variant 5018 ϩ 2T/C in exon 36. Login to comment

[hide] Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence and Optical C... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 1;56(12):7274-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17371. Duncker T, Stein GE, Lee W, Tsang SH, Zernant J, Bearelly S, Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Delori FC, Allikmets R, Sparrow JR
Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence and Optical Coherence Tomography in ABCA4 Carriers.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 1;56(12):7274-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17371., [PMID:26551331]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess whether carriers of ABCA4 mutations have increased RPE lipofuscin levels based on quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) and whether spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) reveals structural abnormalities in this cohort. METHODS: Seventy-five individuals who are heterozygous for ABCA4 mutations (mean age, 47.3 years; range, 9-82 years) were recruited as family members of affected patients from 46 unrelated families. For comparison, 57 affected family members with biallelic ABCA4 mutations (mean age, 23.4 years; range, 6-67 years) and two noncarrier siblings were also enrolled. Autofluorescence images (30 degrees , 488-nm excitation) were acquired with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope equipped with an internal fluorescent reference. The gray levels (GLs) of each image were calibrated to the reference, zero GL, magnification, and normative optical media density to yield qAF. Horizontal SD-OCT scans through the fovea were obtained and the thicknesses of the outer retinal layers were measured. RESULTS: In 60 of 65 carriers of ABCA4 mutations (age range, 9-60), qAF levels were within normal limits (95% confidence level) observed for healthy noncarrier subjects, while qAF levels of affected family members were significantly increased. Perifoveal fleck-like abnormalities were observed in fundus AF images in four carriers, and corresponding changes were detected in the outer retinal layers in SD-OCT scans. Thicknesses of the outer retinal layers were within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: With few exceptions, individuals heterozygous for ABCA4 mutations and between the ages of 9 and 60 years do not present with elevated qAF. In a small number of carriers, perifoveal fleck-like changes were visible.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
62 Continued Subject Sex Age Race/ Ethnicity Relationship to Proband ABCA4 Mutation BCVA, logMAR Eye Segmented qAF8 OD OS OD OS S38.3 M 50.9 White Father p.C2150Y 0.00 0.00 OS 336 380 S39.3 F 42.5 White Mother c.5714&#fe;5G>A 0.00 0.00 n/a 462 393 S39.4 F 18.4 White Sister c.5714&#fe;5G>A 0.00 0.00 n/a 222 212 S40.2 F 50.1 White Mother p.R2030Q 0.00 0.00 OD 433 n/a S40.3 M 48.8 White Father p.K1547* 0.00 0.00 OS n/a 477 S41.2 F 60.3 White Mother p.C54Y 0.00 0.00 OS n/a n/a S42.2 F 44.5 White Mother p.Q1412* 0.10 0.00 OS 264 291 S42.3 M 44.2 White Father p.R1108C 0.30 0.18 OD 264 232 S43.2 F 44.9 White Mother p.G1961E 0.00 0.00 OS 404 n/a S44.3 M 37.1 Asian Father c.4248_4250del 0.00 0.00 OD 307 317 S45.2 F 66.3 White Mother p.N965Y 0.18 0.40 n/a n/a n/a S45.3 M 68.0 White Father p.P1486L 0.00 0.00 n/a n/a n/a S46 M 32.3 White Spouseߤ p.T897I 0.12 0.12 OD 194 200 BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; qAF8, average quantitative autofluorescence of the 8 measurement sites from all available images per eye; n/a, not available. Login to comment