ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Asp1532Asn

ClinVar:	c.4594G>A , p.Asp1532Asn D , Pathogenic
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (71%), C: D (71%), E: N (53%), F: D (80%), G: D (66%), H: D (71%), I: D (80%), K: D (66%), L: D (80%), M: D (80%), N: D (91%), P: D (71%), Q: D (66%), R: D (71%), S: D (59%), T: D (53%), V: D (75%), W: D (91%), Y: D (80%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: D, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: D, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] A comparison of fundus autofluorescence and retina... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Aug;50(8):3953-9. Epub 2009 Mar 25. Gomes NL, Greenstein VC, Carlson JN, Tsang SH, Smith RT, Carr RE, Hood DC, Chang S
A comparison of fundus autofluorescence and retinal structure in patients with Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Aug;50(8):3953-9. Epub 2009 Mar 25., [PMID:19324865]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To improve the understanding of Stargardt disease by comparing structural changes seen on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to those visible on fundus autofluorescence (FAF). METHODS: FAF and SD-OCT were performed on 22 eyes of 11 patients with Stargardt disease. SD-OCT images were obtained at the fovea and at the eccentric preferred retinal locus (PRL). The diameters of absent (hypoautofluorescence) and abnormal FAF areas were measured. The extent of the transverse defect of the junction between the inner and outer segments of the photoreceptors (IS-OS) was measured in the foveal area. The PRL was evaluated with fundus photography and microperimetry. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 22 eyes showed defective FAF. In 17 eyes, FAF was absent in the fovea and in four eyes, FAF was abnormal. All eyes showed disorganization and/or loss of the IS-OS junction in the foveal area on SD-OCT. The diameter of the absent FAF area was smaller than the measurement of the IS-OS junction loss; the latter was closer to the diameter of the abnormal FAF area. Seventeen eyes had an eccentric PRL associated with a retinal area with no defects on FAF. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of eyes, changes shown by SD-OCT correlated well with changes in FAF. However, in three patients, photoreceptor abnormalities were seen in the fovea on SD-OCT without an equivalent abnormality on FAF. This result suggests that in these patients, the structural integrity of the photoreceptors may be affected earlier than changes in the RPE at least as detected by FAF.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
97 Summary of Genetic and Selected Clinical Findings Patient Age Sex Allele 1 Allele 2 Visual Acuity (LogMAR) PRL (Degrees) PRL Location OD OS OD OS OD OS 1 12 M K346T ND 0.7 0.7 5.8 5.9 S S 2 42 M ND ND 1.0 1.0 1.9 2.0 S S 3 31 M G1961E G1961E 0.5 0.5 2.8 1.9 S S 4 56 M P1380L S1696N 0.7 0.7 8.4 8.0 S S 5 23 F L541P/A1038V G1961E 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 F F 6 62 F D1532N G1961E 1.3 0.4 3.0 0.0 T F 7 65 F G1961E ND 0.3 1.3 4.0 2.0 S S 8 30 F G1961E ND 0.4 0.4 2.9 3.0 S S 9 24 F P1380L P1380L 0.3 0.3 8.6 8.5 S S 10 15 F L541P/A1038V G1961E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 F F 11 20 F L541P/A1038V ND 0.3 0.4 1.8 2.0 S S ND, not determined; S, superior; F, foveal; T, temporal. Login to comment

[hide] G1961E mutant allele in the Stargardt disease gene... Exp Eye Res. 2009 Jun 15;89(1):16-24. Epub 2009 Feb 13. Cella W, Greenstein VC, Zernant-Rajang J, Smith TR, Barile G, Allikmets R, Tsang SH
G1961E mutant allele in the Stargardt disease gene ABCA4 causes bull's eye maculopathy.
Exp Eye Res. 2009 Jun 15;89(1):16-24. Epub 2009 Feb 13., [PMID:19217903]

Abstract [show]
The aim of this study was to characterize the pathological and functional consequences of the G1961E mutant allele in the Stargardt disease gene ABCA4. Data from 15 patients were retrospectively reviewed and all the patients had at least one G1961E mutation. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination, full-field and pattern electroretinograms, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging were performed on all patients. Microperimetry, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography were performed in selected cases. Genetic screening was performed using the ABCR400 micro-array that currently detects 496 distinct ABCA4 variants. All patients had normal full-field scotopic and photopic electroretinograms (ERGs) and abnormal pattern electroretinograms (PERGs) performed on both eyes, and all the fundi had bull's eye maculopathy without retinal flecks on FAF. On OCT, 1 patient had disorganization of photoreceptor outer segment, 2 had outer nuclear layer (ONL) thinning likely due to photoreceptor atrophy proximal to the foveal center, and 3 had additional retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) atrophy. On microperimetry, 6 patients had eccentric superior fixation and amongst this group, 5 had an absolute scotoma in the foveal area. DNA analysis revealed that 3 patients were homozygous G1961E/G1961E and the rest were compound heterozygotes for G1961E and other ABCA4 mutations. The G1961E allele in either homozygosity or heterozygosity is associated with anatomical and functional pathologies limited to the parafoveal region and a trend to delayed onset of symptoms, relative to other manifestations of ABCA4 mutations. Our observations support the hypothesis that the G1961E allele contributes to localized macular changes rather than generalized retinal dysfunction, and is a cause of bull's eye maculopathy in either the homozygosity or heterozygosity state. In addition, genetic testing provides precise diagnosis of the underlying maculopathy, and current non-invasive imaging techniques could be used to detect photoreceptor damage at the earliest clinical onset of the disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
89 Of the compound heterozygous group, 5 patients from 2 families had the complex mutation L541P/A1038V, 2 patients (siblings) had the splicing mutation IVS20 þ 5G / A, and 5 patients had missense mutations Q636H, R2077W, T1253M, C54Y and D1532N (Table 1). Login to comment
131 In 5 patients (patients 7-11), missense mutations Q636H, R2077W, T1253M, C54Y and D1532N were found in addition to the G1961E allele, respectively. Login to comment
142 Case #, sex Age of onset Duration (years) Visual acuity (OD, OS) Allele 2 Bull`s eye type (FAF) SD-OCT MP-1 1, f 20 1 20/25, 20/40 G1961E (homozygous) B Not tested Not tested 2, f 49 13 20/200, 20/150 G1961E (homozygous) B Photoreceptor loss, thinner ONL and RPE atrophy Absolute scotoma in the central 4 degrees OD and in the central 6 degrees OS, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 3, m 19 13 20/70, 20/70 G1961E (homozygous) A Not tested Absolute scotoma in the central 6 degrees in both eyes, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 4.1, f 17 30 20/200, 20/200 L541P/A1038V B Not tested Not tested 4.2, m 28 2 20/25, 20/30 L541P/A1038V B Not tested Decreased sensitivity by 6 dB in the central 2 degrees in both eyes, foveal fixation 4.3, m 28 2 20/30, 20/40 L541P/A1038V B Not tested Decreased sensitivity by 9 dB OD and 11 dB OS in the central 2 degrees, foveal fixation 5.1, f 14 5 20/200, 20/400 L541P/A1038V C Photoreceptor loss (foveal optical gap), thinner ONL and normal RPE Decreased sensitivity by 8 dB in the central 2 degrees in both eyes, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 5.2, f 14 1 20/20, 20/25 L541P/A1038V A Photoreceptor disorganization, normal ONL and normal RPE Decreased sensitivity by 6 dB in the central 2 degrees in both eyes, foveal fixation 6.1, f 17 5 20/100, 20/100 IVS20 þ 5G / A C Photoreceptor loss, thinner ONL and RPE atrophy Absolute scotoma in the central 2 degrees in both eyes, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 6.2, m 14 3 20/40, 20/25 IVS20 þ 5G / A A Photoreceptor loss (foveal optical gap), thinner ONL and normal RPE Absolute scotoma in the central 2 degrees OD and decreased sensitivity by 18 dB in the central 2 degrees OS, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 7, m 28 12 20/200, 20/150 Q636H B Photoreceptor loss, thinner ONL and RPE atrophy Not tested 8, f 25 9 20/80, 20/25 R2077W B Not tested Not tested 9, m 67 2 20/800, 20/60 T1253M B Not tested Not tested 10, f 26 10 20/80, 20/80 C54Y B Not tested Not tested 11, f 44 20 20/400, 20/60 D1532N C Not tested Absolute scotoma in the central 8-10 degrees OD and absolute scotoma in the central 8 degrees OS, eccentric PRL (superior retina) Abbreviations: m, male; f, female; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; bull`s eye type A, presence of a ring of increase autofluorescence surrounding decreased autofluorescence; bull`s eye type B, decreased fovea autofluorescence without a surrounding ring of increase autofluorescence; bull`s eye type C, speckled macular appearance with slightly increased surround autofluorescence; SD-OCT, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography; ONL, outer nuclear layer; MP-1, microperimetry; and PRL, preferred retinal location. Login to comment
180 Visual acuity level related to disease duration was also observed in patients 7, 10 and 11 with missense mutations Q636H, C54Y and D1532N. Login to comment
182 An exception was patient 9 with the missense mutation T1253M that imparts an amino acid change outside of ABCA4 functional domain and presented with poor visual acuity but uncertain disease duration. Login to comment
143 Case #, sex Age of onset Duration (years) Visual acuity (OD, OS) Allele 2 Bull`s eye type (FAF) SD-OCT MP-1 1, f 20 1 20/25, 20/40 G1961E (homozygous) B Not tested Not tested 2, f 49 13 20/200, 20/150 G1961E (homozygous) B Photoreceptor loss, thinner ONL and RPE atrophy Absolute scotoma in the central 4 degrees OD and in the central 6 degrees OS, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 3, m 19 13 20/70, 20/70 G1961E (homozygous) A Not tested Absolute scotoma in the central 6 degrees in both eyes, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 4.1, f 17 30 20/200, 20/200 L541P/A1038V B Not tested Not tested 4.2, m 28 2 20/25, 20/30 L541P/A1038V B Not tested Decreased sensitivity by 6 dB in the central 2 degrees in both eyes, foveal fixation 4.3, m 28 2 20/30, 20/40 L541P/A1038V B Not tested Decreased sensitivity by 9 dB OD and 11 dB OS in the central 2 degrees, foveal fixation 5.1, f 14 5 20/200, 20/400 L541P/A1038V C Photoreceptor loss (foveal optical gap), thinner ONL and normal RPE Decreased sensitivity by 8 dB in the central 2 degrees in both eyes, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 5.2, f 14 1 20/20, 20/25 L541P/A1038V A Photoreceptor disorganization, normal ONL and normal RPE Decreased sensitivity by 6 dB in the central 2 degrees in both eyes, foveal fixation 6.1, f 17 5 20/100, 20/100 IVS20 &#fe; 5G / A C Photoreceptor loss, thinner ONL and RPE atrophy Absolute scotoma in the central 2 degrees in both eyes, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 6.2, m 14 3 20/40, 20/25 IVS20 &#fe; 5G / A A Photoreceptor loss (foveal optical gap), thinner ONL and normal RPE Absolute scotoma in the central 2 degrees OD and decreased sensitivity by 18 dB in the central 2 degrees OS, eccentric PRL (superior retina) 7, m 28 12 20/200, 20/150 Q636H B Photoreceptor loss, thinner ONL and RPE atrophy Not tested 8, f 25 9 20/80, 20/25 R2077W B Not tested Not tested 9, m 67 2 20/800, 20/60 T1253M B Not tested Not tested 10, f 26 10 20/80, 20/80 C54Y B Not tested Not tested 11, f 44 20 20/400, 20/60 D1532N C Not tested Absolute scotoma in the central 8-10 degrees OD and absolute scotoma in the central 8 degrees OS, eccentric PRL (superior retina) Abbreviations: m, male; f, female; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; bull`s eye type A, presence of a ring of increase autofluorescence surrounding decreased autofluorescence; bull`s eye type B, decreased fovea autofluorescence without a surrounding ring of increase autofluorescence; bull`s eye type C, speckled macular appearance with slightly increased surround autofluorescence; SD-OCT, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography; ONL, outer nuclear layer; MP-1, microperimetry; and PRL, preferred retinal location. Login to comment

[hide] Correlation of clinical and genetic findings in Hu... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4402-8. Hargitai J, Zernant J, Somfai GM, Vamos R, Farkas A, Salacz G, Allikmets R
Correlation of clinical and genetic findings in Hungarian patients with Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4402-8., [PMID:16303926]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (arSTGD) presents with substantial clinical and genetic heterogeneity. This study was conducted to correlate foveolar thickness (FT) and total macular volume (TMV), measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), with other clinical characteristics and with specific genetic variation in Hungarian patients with arSTGD. METHODS: After a standard ophthalmic workup, both eyes of 35 patients with STGD from Hungary and of 25 age-matched healthy control subjects were tested with OCT. FT and TMV were measured automatically with the OCT mapping software in the nine Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study areas of 3500 microm in diameter. All patients were screened for mutations by a combination of the ABCR400 microarray and direct sequencing. RESULTS: The patients with STGD presented with markedly thinned retina in the foveola and decreased macular volume, 72 microm and 1.69 mm3, respectively, compared with 169 microm and 2.48 mm3 in the normal subjects, respectively. Statistically significant correlation was observed between visual acuity (VA) and TMV and between VA and FT. Disease-associated mutations were detected in 23 (65.7%) of 35 patients, including 48.5% with both alleles and 17.2% with one allele. The most frequent ABCA4 alleles in Hungarian patients with STGD were L541P/A1038V (in 28% of all patients), G1961E (20%) and IVS40+5G-->A (17%). Specific genotypes correlated with some phenotypic features and allowed for predictions of the disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Hungarian patients with STGD presented with extensive foveolar thinning and macular volume loss. Genetic analysis detected several ABCA4 alleles at high frequency in the cohort of patients, suggesting founder effect(s). Unusually homogeneous distribution of disease-associated mutations aided genotype-phenotype correlation analyses in this population.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
89 Summarized Clinical and Genetic Data of Patients with STGD Patient Allele 1 Allele 2 Fishman OU Gender Age Duration VA OD VA OS FT OD (␮m) FT OS (␮m) MV OD (mm3 ) MV OS (mm3 ) 1 ND ND I M 18 10 0.42 0.50 90.00 76.00 1.70 1.67 2 L541P/A1038V ND III F 27 15 0.06 0.08 43.00 58.00 1.27 1.28 3 5917delG 5917delG II F 29 8 0.17 0.17 54.00 20.00 1.38 1.35 4 ND ND III F 42 14 0.10 0.10 91.00 71.00 1.60 1.59 5 V2050L ND II F 22 5 0.20 0.33 28.00 77.00 1.64 1.68 6 ND ND II F 17 2 1.00 0.71 156.00 141.00 2.55 2.6 7 IVS40ϩ5GϾA ND III M 28 13 0.10 0.06 71.00 92.00 1.61 1.61 8 L541P/A1038V G1961E II M 37 15 0.10 0.10 87.00 97.00 1.95 1.95 9 106delT G1961E II M 32 7 0.08 0.08 51.00 32.00 1.59 1.66 10 ND ND I F 55 17 0.25 0.56 160.00 170.00 1.72 1.82 11 L541P/A1038V G863A II F 15 3 0.25 0.33 67.00 68.00 1.78 1.76 12 IVS40ϩ5GϾA 5917delG III M 15 6 0.20 0.20 107.00 117.00 1.93 1.92 13 ND ND I M 27 2 0.38 0.33 56.00 86.00 2.01 1.97 14 G1886E G1961E II F 37 9 0.12 0.16 92.00 46.00 1.55 1.59 15 G1961E ND III F 20 5 0.30 0.20 49.00 34.00 1.43 1.53 16 ND ND II M 28 14 0.32 0.08 52.00 60.00 1.46 1.52 17 IVS40ϩ5GϾA 5917delG III M 27 5 0.10 0.10 97.00 92.00 1.76 1.71 18 L541P/A1038V D1532N III M 28 12 0.25 0.10 49.00 46.00 1.83 1.86 19 ND ND II F 31 11 0.10 0.13 67.00 72.00 1.55 1.49 20 L541P L541P/A1038V II F 15 5 0.10 0.10 28.00 34.00 1.63 1.65 21 L541P/A1038V G863A II F 25 2 0.20 0.62 94.00 81.00 1.92 1.94 22 L541P/A1038V ND II M 18 9 0.08 0.10 63.00 72.00 1.40 1.43 23 G1961E ND III F 34 9 0.16 0.16 16.00 23.00 1.31 1.56 24 ND ND II F 52 14 0.16 0.16 122.00 113.00 1.90 1.99 25 P68L L541P/A1038V III M 37 22 0.10 0.12 40.00 40.00 1.41 1.42 26 ND ND II F 18 11 0.20 0.25 59.00 72.00 1.42 1.47 27 L541P/A1038V G1961E II F 24 7 0.18 0.18 83.00 100.00 1.72 1.77 28 IVS40ϩ5GϾA 5917delG III M 15 7 0.10 0.16 38.00 46.00 1.30 1.41 29 R1108C R1108C II M 31 14 0.10 0.10 41.00 44.00 1.95 1.96 30 G1961E ND II M 28 6 0.33 0.56 91.00 129.00 1.98 2.04 31 ND ND II F 28 11 0.08 0.10 55.00 63.00 1.52 1.59 32 L541P/A1038V G863A II M 32 15 0.20 0.20 92.00 86.00 1.80 1.75 33 ND ND II F 27 4 0.25 0.20 66.00 75.00 1.72 1.76 34 ND ND II F 36 8 0.12 0.10 58.00 69.00 1.59 1.56 35 IVS40ϩ5GϾA IVS40ϩ5GϾA III F 19 6 0.10 0.10 62.00 53.00 1.67 1.65 Fishman OU, classification of patients by fundus photos in three categories according to Fishman et al.25 ND, not determined. Login to comment
87 Summarized Clinical and Genetic Data of Patients with STGD Patient Allele 1 Allele 2 Fishman OU Gender Age Duration VA OD VA OS FT OD (òe;m) FT OS (òe;m) MV OD (mm3 ) MV OS (mm3 ) 1 ND ND I M 18 10 0.42 0.50 90.00 76.00 1.70 1.67 2 L541P/A1038V ND III F 27 15 0.06 0.08 43.00 58.00 1.27 1.28 3 5917delG 5917delG II F 29 8 0.17 0.17 54.00 20.00 1.38 1.35 4 ND ND III F 42 14 0.10 0.10 91.00 71.00 1.60 1.59 5 V2050L ND II F 22 5 0.20 0.33 28.00 77.00 1.64 1.68 6 ND ND II F 17 2 1.00 0.71 156.00 141.00 2.55 2.6 7 IVS40af9;5Gb0e;A ND III M 28 13 0.10 0.06 71.00 92.00 1.61 1.61 8 L541P/A1038V G1961E II M 37 15 0.10 0.10 87.00 97.00 1.95 1.95 9 106delT G1961E II M 32 7 0.08 0.08 51.00 32.00 1.59 1.66 10 ND ND I F 55 17 0.25 0.56 160.00 170.00 1.72 1.82 11 L541P/A1038V G863A II F 15 3 0.25 0.33 67.00 68.00 1.78 1.76 12 IVS40af9;5Gb0e;A 5917delG III M 15 6 0.20 0.20 107.00 117.00 1.93 1.92 13 ND ND I M 27 2 0.38 0.33 56.00 86.00 2.01 1.97 14 G1886E G1961E II F 37 9 0.12 0.16 92.00 46.00 1.55 1.59 15 G1961E ND III F 20 5 0.30 0.20 49.00 34.00 1.43 1.53 16 ND ND II M 28 14 0.32 0.08 52.00 60.00 1.46 1.52 17 IVS40af9;5Gb0e;A 5917delG III M 27 5 0.10 0.10 97.00 92.00 1.76 1.71 18 L541P/A1038V D1532N III M 28 12 0.25 0.10 49.00 46.00 1.83 1.86 19 ND ND II F 31 11 0.10 0.13 67.00 72.00 1.55 1.49 20 L541P L541P/A1038V II F 15 5 0.10 0.10 28.00 34.00 1.63 1.65 21 L541P/A1038V G863A II F 25 2 0.20 0.62 94.00 81.00 1.92 1.94 22 L541P/A1038V ND II M 18 9 0.08 0.10 63.00 72.00 1.40 1.43 23 G1961E ND III F 34 9 0.16 0.16 16.00 23.00 1.31 1.56 24 ND ND II F 52 14 0.16 0.16 122.00 113.00 1.90 1.99 25 P68L L541P/A1038V III M 37 22 0.10 0.12 40.00 40.00 1.41 1.42 26 ND ND II F 18 11 0.20 0.25 59.00 72.00 1.42 1.47 27 L541P/A1038V G1961E II F 24 7 0.18 0.18 83.00 100.00 1.72 1.77 28 IVS40af9;5Gb0e;A 5917delG III M 15 7 0.10 0.16 38.00 46.00 1.30 1.41 29 R1108C R1108C II M 31 14 0.10 0.10 41.00 44.00 1.95 1.96 30 G1961E ND II M 28 6 0.33 0.56 91.00 129.00 1.98 2.04 31 ND ND II F 28 11 0.08 0.10 55.00 63.00 1.52 1.59 32 L541P/A1038V G863A II M 32 15 0.20 0.20 92.00 86.00 1.80 1.75 33 ND ND II F 27 4 0.25 0.20 66.00 75.00 1.72 1.76 34 ND ND II F 36 8 0.12 0.10 58.00 69.00 1.59 1.56 35 IVS40af9;5Gb0e;A IVS40af9;5Gb0e;A III F 19 6 0.10 0.10 62.00 53.00 1.67 1.65 Fishman OU, classification of patients by fundus photos in three categories according to Fishman et al.25 ND, not determined. Login to comment

[hide] Cosegregation and functional analysis of mutant AB... Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Nov 1;10(23):2671-8. Shroyer NF, Lewis RA, Yatsenko AN, Wensel TG, Lupski JR
Cosegregation and functional analysis of mutant ABCR (ABCA4) alleles in families that manifest both Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.
Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Nov 1;10(23):2671-8., [PMID:11726554]

Abstract [show]
Mutations in ABCR (ABCA4) have been reported to cause a spectrum of autosomal recessively inherited retinopathies, including Stargardt disease (STGD), cone-rod dystrophy and retinitis pigmentosa. Individuals heterozygous for ABCR mutations may be predisposed to develop the multifactorial disorder age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We hypothesized that some carriers of STGD alleles have an increased risk to develop AMD. We tested this hypothesis in a cohort of families that manifest both STGD and AMD. With a direct-sequencing mutation detection strategy, we found that AMD-affected relatives of STGD patients are more likely to be carriers of pathogenic STGD alleles than predicted based on chance alone. We further investigated the role of AMD-associated ABCR mutations by testing for expression and ATP-binding defects in an in vitro biochemical assay. We found that mutations associated with AMD have a range of assayable defects ranging from no detectable defect to apparent null alleles. Of the 21 missense ABCR mutations reported in patients with AMD, 16 (76%) show abnormalities in protein expression, ATP-binding or ATPase activity. We infer that carrier relatives of STGD patients are predisposed to develop AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
97 Pedigree Maternal allele Paternal allele AMD relative A priori Cosegregation AR19 pGM, -6 0.5 - AR33 [W1408R; R1640W] R24H and D1532N mA, -16 0.5 Yes AR59 4232insTATG C1488R pGM, -6 0.5 No AR80 T1526M pGF, -5 0.5 - AR80 T1526M mGF, -7 0.5 Yes AR125 4947delC C1488R pGM, -7 0.5 Yes AR215 [H1406Y; V2050L] pGM, -5 0.5 - AR218 2160+1G→C G1961E mA, -8 0.5 No AR262 W821R pGGF, -7 0.25 No AR271 P68R E1087K mGA, -6 0.25 No AR335 D645N F608I mGM, -9 0.5 Yes AR382 R1108C mGM, -6 0.5 Yes AR389 E2096K 5714+5G→A pGM, -8 0.5 Yes AR397 5196+1G→A 5585-1G→A mA, -5 0.5 No AR410 A1038V 768G→T pC, -5 0.25 Yes AR422 pGM, -6 0.5 - AR423 P1380L D1532N pGF, -4 0.5 No AR468 P1380L P1380L mU, -9 0.5 Yes AR484 L2027F G550R mGU, -5 0.25 Yes AR562 R2107H 3050+5G→A pGU, -5 0.25 No AR643 5196+2T→C L2027F mU, -4 0.5 Yes AR661 P1380L C54Y mGF, -6 0.5 Yes AR669 664del13 pGF, -4 0.5 No AR534 W821R P1380L pGM, -7 0.5 Yes (17) Family 1 R212C I2113M mGM, I-2 0.5 Yes (27) Family 2 R1108C R2107H mGM, I-2 0.5 Yes (27) Family 3 R212C G1977S mGF, I-1 0.5 Yes (27) 10.25 15 unlikely to account for many of the remaining alleles (our unpublished observations). Login to comment

[hide] Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-spe... Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34. Lewis RA, Shroyer NF, Singh N, Allikmets R, Hutchinson A, Li Y, Lupski JR, Leppert M, Dean M
Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter gene, ABCR, in Stargardt disease.
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34., [PMID:9973280]

Abstract [show]
Mutation scanning and direct DNA sequencing of all 50 exons of ABCR were completed for 150 families segregating recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). ABCR variations were identified in 173 (57%) disease chromosomes, the majority of which represent missense amino acid substitutions. These ABCR variants were not found in 220 unaffected control individuals (440 chromosomes) but do cosegregate with the disease in these families with STGD1, and many occur in conserved functional domains. Missense amino acid substitutions located in the amino terminal one-third of the protein appear to be associated with earlier onset of the disease and may represent misfolding alleles. The two most common mutant alleles, G1961E and A1038V, each identified in 16 of 173 disease chromosomes, composed 18.5% of mutations identified. G1961E has been associated previously, at a statistically significant level in the heterozygous state, with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Clinical evaluation of these 150 families with STGD1 revealed a high frequency of AMD in first- and second-degree relatives. These findings support the hypothesis that compound heterozygous ABCR mutations are responsible for STGD1 and that some heterozygous ABCR mutations may enhance susceptibility to AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
76 2 0071GrA R24H 1 19 2894ArG N965S 3 36 5196ϩ1GrA Splice 2 3 0161GrA C54Y 1 21 3113CrT A1038V 16 5196ϩ2TrC Splice 1 0179CrT A60V 1 22 3211insGT FS 1 37 5281del9 PAL1761del 1 0203CrG P68R 1 3212CrT S1071L 1 38 5459GrC R1820P 1 0223TrG C75G 1 3215TrC V1072A 1 39 5512CrT H1838Y 1 6 0634CrT R212C 1 3259GrA E1087K 1 5527CrT R1843W 1 0664del13 FS 1 3322CrT R1108C 6 40 5585-1GrA Splice 1 0746ArG D249G 1 23 3364GrA E1122K 1 5657GrA G1886E 1 8 1007CrG S336C 1 3385GrT R1129C 1 5693GrA R1898H 4 1018TrG Y340D 1 3386GrT R1129L 2 5714ϩ5GrA Splice 8 11 1411GrA E471K 1 24 3602TrG L1201R 1 42 5882GrA G1961E 16 12 1569TrG D523E 1 25 3610GrA D1204N 1 5898ϩ1GrT Splice 3 1622TrC L541P 1 28 4139CrT P1380L 4 43 5908CrT L1970F 1 1715GrA R572Q 2 4216CrT H1406Y 1 5929GrA G1977S 1 1715GrC R572P 1 4222TrC W1408R 4 6005ϩ1GrT Splice 1 13 1804CrT R602W 1 4232insTATG FS 1 44 6079CrT L2027F 11 1822TrA F608I 2 4253ϩ5GrT Splice 1 6088CrT R2030X 1 1917CrA Y639X 1 29 4297GrA V1433I 1 6089GrA R2030Q 1 1933GrA D645N 1 4316GrA G1439D 2 6112CrT R2038W 1 14 2005delAT FS 1 4319TrC F1440S 1 45 6148GrC V2050L 2 2090GrA W697X 1 4346GrA W1449X 1 6166ArT K2056X 1 2160ϩ1GrC Splice 1 30a 4462TrC C1488R 2 6229CrT R2077W 1 16 2453GrA G818E 1 4457CrT P1486L 1 46 6286GrA E2096K 1 2461TrA W821R 1 30b 4469GrA C1490Y 3 6316CrT R2106C 1 2536GrC D846H 1 4539ϩ1GrT Splice 1 47 6391GrA E2131K 1 2552GrC G851D 1 31 4577CrT T1526M 7 6415CrT R2139W 1 17 2588GrC G863A 11 4594GrA D1532N 3 6445CrT R2149X 1 19 2791GrA V931M 2 35 4947delC FS 1 48 6543del36 1181del12 1 2827CrT R943W 1 36 5041del15 VVAIC1681del 2 6709insG FS 1 2884delC FS 1 5087GrA S1696N 1 NOTE.-FS ϭ frameshift. Login to comment
178 Table 2 ABCR Allelic Series MUTATION(S) PEDIGREE AGE AT ONSET (YEARS) MEAN AGE AT ONSET ‫ע‬ SD (YEARS)Allele 1 Allele 2 G863A Y340D, R772Q AR31 8 19.6 ‫ע‬ 12.7 51961GrA AR307 10 A1038V AR290 16 5714ϩ5GrA AR314 25 5898ϩ1GrT AR336 39 A1038V R572P AR321 6 12.5 ‫ע‬ 6.9 S1071L AR358 6 L1970F AR428 6 5196ϩ2TrC AR71 7 G1961E AR417 8 L2027F AR181 9 R1898H AR78 14 G863A AR290 16 G1961E AR274 20 R1108C AR393 20 R1108C AR376 25 P1380L W1408R AR341 6 8.2 ‫ע‬ 1.5 E1122K AR534 8 2005delAT AR357 8 D1532N AR423 9 W821R AR534 10 G1961E A1038V AR417 8 14.3 ‫ע‬ 4.5 C75G AR427 12 C1490Y AR370 13 2160ϩ1GrC AR218 14 4253ϩ5GrT AR373 19 A1038V AR274 20 L2027F R602W AR88 9 13.0 ‫ע‬ 5.5 A1038V AR181 9 R2149X AR263 9 T1526M AR326 19 T1526M AR391 19 (70%) had onset in the first 2 decades of life, but 11 (16%) had onset in the 3d decade and 6 (9%) in the 4th decade. Login to comment
77 2 0071GrA R24H 1 19 2894ArG N965S 3 36 5196af9;1GrA Splice 2 3 0161GrA C54Y 1 21 3113CrT A1038V 16 5196af9;2TrC Splice 1 0179CrT A60V 1 22 3211insGT FS 1 37 5281del9 PAL1761del 1 0203CrG P68R 1 3212CrT S1071L 1 38 5459GrC R1820P 1 0223TrG C75G 1 3215TrC V1072A 1 39 5512CrT H1838Y 1 6 0634CrT R212C 1 3259GrA E1087K 1 5527CrT R1843W 1 0664del13 FS 1 3322CrT R1108C 6 40 5585afa;1GrA Splice 1 0746ArG D249G 1 23 3364GrA E1122K 1 5657GrA G1886E 1 8 1007CrG S336C 1 3385GrT R1129C 1 5693GrA R1898H 4 1018TrG Y340D 1 3386GrT R1129L 2 5714af9;5GrA Splice 8 11 1411GrA E471K 1 24 3602TrG L1201R 1 42 5882GrA G1961E 16 12 1569TrG D523E 1 25 3610GrA D1204N 1 5898af9;1GrT Splice 3 1622TrC L541P 1 28 4139CrT P1380L 4 43 5908CrT L1970F 1 1715GrA R572Q 2 4216CrT H1406Y 1 5929GrA G1977S 1 1715GrC R572P 1 4222TrC W1408R 4 6005af9;1GrT Splice 1 13 1804CrT R602W 1 4232insTATG FS 1 44 6079CrT L2027F 11 1822TrA F608I 2 4253af9;5GrT Splice 1 6088CrT R2030X 1 1917CrA Y639X 1 29 4297GrA V1433I 1 6089GrA R2030Q 1 1933GrA D645N 1 4316GrA G1439D 2 6112CrT R2038W 1 14 2005delAT FS 1 4319TrC F1440S 1 45 6148GrC V2050L 2 2090GrA W697X 1 4346GrA W1449X 1 6166ArT K2056X 1 2160af9;1GrC Splice 1 30a 4462TrC C1488R 2 6229CrT R2077W 1 16 2453GrA G818E 1 4457CrT P1486L 1 46 6286GrA E2096K 1 2461TrA W821R 1 30b 4469GrA C1490Y 3 6316CrT R2106C 1 2536GrC D846H 1 4539af9;1GrT Splice 1 47 6391GrA E2131K 1 2552GrC G851D 1 31 4577CrT T1526M 7 6415CrT R2139W 1 17 2588GrC G863A 11 4594GrA D1532N 3 6445CrT R2149X 1 19 2791GrA V931M 2 35 4947delC FS 1 48 6543del36 1181del12 1 2827CrT R943W 1 36 5041del15 VVAIC1681del 2 6709insG FS 1 2884delC FS 1 5087GrA S1696N 1 NOTE.-FS afd; frameshift. Login to comment
179 Table 2 ABCR Allelic Series MUTATION(S) PEDIGREE AGE AT ONSET (YEARS) MEAN AGE AT ONSET cf2; SD (YEARS) Allele 1 Allele 2 G863A Y340D, R772Q AR31 8 19.6 cf2; 12.7 51961GrA AR307 10 A1038V AR290 16 5714af9;5GrA AR314 25 5898af9;1GrT AR336 39 A1038V R572P AR321 6 12.5 cf2; 6.9 S1071L AR358 6 L1970F AR428 6 5196af9;2TrC AR71 7 G1961E AR417 8 L2027F AR181 9 R1898H AR78 14 G863A AR290 16 G1961E AR274 20 R1108C AR393 20 R1108C AR376 25 P1380L W1408R AR341 6 8.2 cf2; 1.5 E1122K AR534 8 2005delAT AR357 8 D1532N AR423 9 W821R AR534 10 G1961E A1038V AR417 8 14.3 cf2; 4.5 C75G AR427 12 C1490Y AR370 13 2160af9;1GrC AR218 14 4253af9;5GrT AR373 19 A1038V AR274 20 L2027F R602W AR88 9 13.0 cf2; 5.5 A1038V AR181 9 R2149X AR263 9 T1526M AR326 19 T1526M AR391 19 (70%) had onset in the first 2 decades of life, but 11 (16%) had onset in the 3d decade and 6 (9%) in the 4th decade. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and molecular genetic study of 12 Italian... Genet Mol Res. 2012 Dec 17;11(4):4342-50. doi: 10.4238/2012.October.9.3. Oldani M, Marchi S, Giani A, Cecchin S, Rigoni E, Persi A, Podavini D, Guerrini A, Nervegna A, Staurenghi G, Bertelli M
Clinical and molecular genetic study of 12 Italian families with autosomal recessive Stargardt disease.
Genet Mol Res. 2012 Dec 17;11(4):4342-50. doi: 10.4238/2012.October.9.3., [PMID:23096905]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease was diagnosed in 12 patients from 12 families using complete ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. DNA was extracted for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct DNA sequencing (ABCA4 gene). Genetic counseling and eye examination were offered to 16 additional family members. Various patterns of presentation were observed in patients with clinical diagnoses of Stargardt disease. The genetic study identified 2 mutations in 75% of families (9/12); a second mutation could not be found in the remaining 25% of families (3/12). The most frequent mutation was G1961E, found in 17% of families (2/12). This finding is similar to that of a previous analysis report of an Italian patient series. Four new mutations were also identified: Tyr1858Asp, Leu1195fsX1196, p.Tyr850Cys, and p.Thr959Ala. Our results suggest that PCR and direct DNA sequencing are the most appropriate techniques for the analysis of the ABCA4 gene. However, this method requires supplementation with specific PCR analysis to diagnose large deletions. The study of the families identified healthy carriers and affected subjects in presymptomatic stages and was also useful for evaluating the risk of transmission to progeny. Combined ophthalmologic and genetic evaluation enabled better clinical management of these families.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
69 of patients Subject Allele 1 Allele 2 Age of diagnosis (years) Visual acuity Right eye Left eye 1 F1 ID81 Tyr1858Asp Met1Val; Arg2030Gln 22 20/50 20/32 2 F2 ID220 Ile156Val Gly607Arg; Gly1961Glu 30 20/800 20/400 3 F3 ID362 Met1Val Gly1961Glu; Arg2030Gln 60 20/40 20/32 4 F4 ID197 Asp1532Asn Arg2030term 40 20/32 20/32 5 F6 ID363 Tyr362Term Gly863Ala 16 20/200 20/250 6 F7 ID365 Arg1098Cys Cys1488Arg 50 20/32 20/800 7 F8 ID394 Arg18Trp Val767Asp 10 20/800 20/800 8 F9 ID396 IVS40+5G>A IVS13+1G>A 19 20/40 20/50 9 F10 ID366 p.Gln1513Profs*42 - 20 20/200 20/200 10 F12 ID377 Leu1195Argfs*2 - 50 20/32 20/20 11 F13 ID4 Cys2150Tyr - 70 20/400 20/400 12 F17 ID457 p.Tyr850Cys p.Thr959Ala 50 20/20 20/40 F1 = family 1; ID = reference code to a specific patient. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disea... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003. Fujinami K, Sergouniotis PI, Davidson AE, Wright G, Chana RK, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Egan CA, Robson AG, Moore AT, Holder GE, Michaelides M, Webster AR
Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disease with preserved foveal structure and function.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003., [PMID:23953153]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease who show a foveal-sparing phenotype. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The foveal-sparing phenotype was defined as foveal preservation on autofluorescence imaging, despite a retinopathy otherwise consistent with Stargardt disease. Forty such individuals were ascertained and a full ophthalmic examination was undertaken. Following mutation screening of ABCA4, the molecular findings were compared with those of patients with Stargardt disease but no foveal sparing. RESULTS: The median age of onset and age at examination of 40 patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype were 43.5 and 46.5 years. The median logMAR visual acuity was 0.18. Twenty-two patients (22/40, 55%) had patchy parafoveal atrophy and flecks; 8 (20%) had numerous flecks at the posterior pole without atrophy; 7 (17.5%) had mottled retinal pigment epithelial changes; 2 (5%) had multiple atrophic lesions, extending beyond the arcades; and 1 (2.5%) had a bull's-eye appearance. The median central foveal thickness assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images was 183.0 mum (n = 33), with outer retinal tubulation observed in 15 (45%). Twenty-two of 33 subjects (67%) had electrophysiological evidence of macular dysfunction without generalized retinal dysfunction. Disease-causing variants were found in 31 patients (31/40, 78%). There was a higher prevalence of the variant p.Arg2030Gln in the cohort with foveal sparing compared to the group with foveal atrophy (6.45% vs 1.07%). CONCLUSIONS: The distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype are described. The presence of 2 distinct phenotypes of Stargardt disease (foveal sparing and foveal atrophy) suggests that there may be more than 1 disease mechanism in ABCA4 retinopathy.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
45 Mutation screening of ABCA4 was performed with the arrayed primer extension (APEX) microarray (ABCR400 chip, Asper Ophthalmics, TABLE 1. Summary of Clinical Findings and Molecular Status of 40 Patients With a Foveal-Sparing Phenotypea of Stargardt Disease Patient Onsetb (y) Age (y) LogMAR Visual Acuity Fundus Patternc OCT ERGe Mutation Status CFTd (mm) ORT Group PERG mfERG OD OS OD OS OD OS OD OS 1 45 45 0 0 3 219 223 NA NA NA NA NA [c.1411 G>A, p.Glu471Lys/c.2588 G>C, p. Gly863Ala/c.4594 G>A, p.Asp1532Asn/c.5693 G>A, p.Arg1898His] 2 33 33 0.18 0.48 1 NA NA 3 ND ND NA NA [c.1622 T>C, p.Leu541Pro/c.3113 C>T, p.Ala1038Val/c.6089 G>A, p.Arg2030Gln] 3 53 66 0.18 0.18 1 NA NA 2 A A NA NA [c.768 G>T, Splice site/c. 6320 G>A, p. Arg2107His ] 4 37 54 1.48 0.18 1 32 39 U 3 ND ND 2 2 [c.1760 &#fe;1 G>T, Splice site/c.4594 G>T, p.Asg1532Tyr ] 5 57 57 0.3 0.18 1 NA NA 1 ND ND NA NA [c. Login to comment
47 6089 G>A, p.Arg2030Gln/c.6118 C>T, p.Arg2040*] 8 39 44 0.1 0.1 4 297 230 U 3 A A NA NA [c.71 G>A, p.Arg24His/c.4577 C>T, p. Thr1526Met] 9 35* 35 0.18 0.18 2 142 154 3 ND ND NA NA [c.658 C>T, p.p.Arg220Cys/c.2588 G>C, p. Gly863Ala] 10 45 54 0.48 0.18 1 102 116 3 ND A NA NA [c.1957 C>T, p.Arg653Cys/c.5693 G>A, p.Arg1898His] 11 43 43 0.1 0 2 170 185 1 A A 2 2 [c.2588 G>C, p. Gly863Ala/c.4139 C>T, p.Ala1038Val] 12 36** 38 0.3 0 1 220 212 U 1 A A 1 1 [c.4139 C>T, p.Ala1038Val/c.4594 G>T, p.Asp1532Asn] 13 62 68 0.1 0.48 1 196 189 U 1 N N 2 2 [c.4222 T>C, p.Trp1408Arg/c.4918 C>T, p.Arg1640Trp] 14 36 44 0.48 0.48 3 79 89 1 A A NA NA [c.4222 T>C, p.Trp1408Arg/c.4918 C>T, p.Arg1640Trp] 15 46* 46 0.1 0.1 3 NA NA 1 A A NA NA [c.4469 G>A, p.Cys1490Tyr/c. Login to comment
127 2588G>C, p.Gly863Ala 4 Het Allikmets46 Intol. 0.01 PRD 0.996 No change 68/13006 db SNP (rs76157638) 21 c.3113C>T, p.Ala1038Val 1 Het Webster53 Tol. NA Benign 0.014 Donor 43.5 70 New site (&#fe;61.72) 22/13006 db SNP (rs61751374) 24 c.3602T>G, p.Leu1201Arg 2 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA Benign 0.052 Donor 61.3 74 New site (&#fe;20.08) 416/13006 db SNP (rs61750126) 27 c.3898C>T, p.Arg1300* 1 Het Rivera49 NA NA ND 28 c.4139C>T, p.Pro1380Leu 2 Het Lewis48 Intol. 0.01 Benign 0.377 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs61750130) 28 c.4222 T>C, p.Trp1408Arg 2 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.845 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750135) 29 c.4319T>C, p.Phe1440Ser 1 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.744 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750141) 30 c.4469G>A, p.Cys1490Tyr 1 Het Webster53 Intol. 0.03 PRD 0.994 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751402) 31 c.4577C>T, p.Thr1526Met 1 Het Lewis48 Intol. 0.00 PRD 0.91 No change ND db SNP (rs61750152) 31 c.4594G>T, p.Asp1532Asn 3 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.853 No change ND 33 c.4685T>C, p.Ile1562Thr 1 Het Allikmets46 Tol. NA Benign 0.034 No change 18/13006 db SNP (rs1762111) 35 c.4956T>G, p.Tyr1652* 1 Het Fumagalli52 NA NA Acceptor 43 72 New site (&#fe;67.36) ND 35 c.4918C>T, p.Arg1640Trp 2 Het Rozet47 Intol. 0.00 PRD 1 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751404) 35 c.4926C>G, p.Ser1642Arg 1 Het Birch50 Tol. 0.68 Benign 0.116 No change ND db SNP (rs61753017) Int 35 c.5018&#fe;2T>C, Splice site 1 Het Fumagalli52 NA NA Donor 81.2 54 WT site broken (33.07) ND Int 38 c.5461-10T>C 3 Het Briggs50 NA NA No change 3/13006 db SNP (rs1800728) 40 c.5693G>A, p.Arg1898His 2 Het Allikmets46 NA Benign 0.00 No change 25/13006 db SNP (rs1800552) 42 c.5882G>A, p.Gly1961Glu 1 Het Allikmets46 Tol. 0.18 PRD 1 No change 41/13006 db SNP (rs1800553) 44 c.6079C>T, p.Leu2027Phe 4 Homo Lewis48 Intol. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 4/13006 db SNP (rs61751408) 44 c.6089G>A, p.Arg2030Gln 4 Het Lewis48 Tol. NA PRD 0.995 No change 8/13006 db SNP (rs61750641) 44 c.6118C>T, p.Arg2040* 1 Het Rosenberg54 NA NA ND 46 c.6320G>A, p.Arg2107His 1 Het Fishman8 Intol. 0.00 PRD 0.996 No change 91/13006 db SNP (rs62642564) EVS &#bc; Exome Variant Server; HSF &#bc; Human Splicing Finder program; Hum var score &#bc; Human var score; Int &#bc; intron; Intol &#bc; intolerant; Mt CV &#bc; mutant consensus value; NA &#bc; not applicable; ND &#bc; not detected; PRD &#bc; probably damaging; Pred. &#bc; prediction; SIFT &#bc; Sorting Intolerant from Tolerance program; Tol. &#bc; tolerant; Wt CV &#bc; wild-type consensus value. Login to comment