ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Phe608Ile

ClinVar:	c.1823T>A , p.Phe608Tyr ? , not provided c.1822T>C , p.Phe608Leu ? , not provided
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (71%), C: N (53%), D: D (75%), E: D (63%), G: D (85%), H: D (59%), I: D (91%), K: D (66%), L: D (95%), M: N (61%), N: D (71%), P: D (80%), Q: D (59%), R: D (63%), S: D (66%), T: D (63%), V: D (59%), W: D (53%), Y: D (91%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: D, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: D, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Deducing the pathogenic contribution of recessive ... Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Oct 1;19(19):3693-701. Epub 2010 Jul 20. Schindler EI, Nylen EL, Ko AC, Affatigato LM, Heggen AC, Wang K, Sheffield VC, Stone EM
Deducing the pathogenic contribution of recessive ABCA4 alleles in an outbred population.
Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Oct 1;19(19):3693-701. Epub 2010 Jul 20., [PMID:20647261]

Abstract [show]
Accurate prediction of the pathogenic effects of specific genotypes is important for the design and execution of clinical trials as well as for meaningful counseling of individual patients. However, for many autosomal recessive diseases, it can be difficult to deduce the relative pathogenic contribution of individual alleles because relatively few affected individuals share the same two disease-causing variations. In this study, we used multiple regression analysis to estimate the pathogenicity of specific alleles of ABCA4 in patients with retinal phenotypes ranging from Stargardt disease to retinitis pigmentosa. This analysis revealed quantitative allelic effects on two aspects of the visual phenotype, visual acuity (P < 10(-3)) and visual field (P < 10(-7)). Discordance between visual acuity and visual field in individual patients suggests the existence of at least two non-ABCA4 modifying factors. The findings of this study will facilitate the discovery of factors that modify ABCA4 disease and will also aid in the optimal selection of subjects for clinical trials of new therapies.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
54 Allele VF model Acuity model Occurrences Groupa Leu2027Phe 22.81 0.14 4 a Leu1201Arg 22.29 0.16 2 a Met316fs 20.71 20.15 4 a Gly1961Glu 18.08 0.26 8 a Gly863Ala 16.54 0.36 19 a Pro1380Leu 15.88 0.39 10 a Ala1038Val 15.19 20.03 12 a Leu541Pro 10.95 0.08 1 b Asn965Ser 9.3 0.07 3 b IVS40 + 5 9.29 0.22 9 b Val256Val 9.27 0.84 2 b Phe608Ile 7.24 0.48 2 b IVS38-10 5.75 0.37 14 b Arg1108Cys 1.29 0.81 6 b Leu1430fs 0.37 0.6 2 b Arg2077Trp 26.89 0.93 4 b a When analyzed as groups, A alleles have significantly milder effects on both visual acuity (P , 1023 ) and visual field (P , 1027 ) than B alleles (see text). Login to comment
57 Allele VF model Acuity model Occurrences Groupa Leu2027Phe 22.81 0.14 4 a Leu1201Arg 22.29 0.16 2 a Met316fs 20.71 20.15 4 a Gly1961Glu 18.08 0.26 8 a Gly863Ala 16.54 0.36 19 a Pro1380Leu 15.88 0.39 10 a Ala1038Val 15.19 20.03 12 a Leu541Pro 10.95 0.08 1 b Asn965Ser 9.3 0.07 3 b IVS40 + 5 9.29 0.22 9 b Val256Val 9.27 0.84 2 b Phe608Ile 7.24 0.48 2 b IVS38-10 5.75 0.37 14 b Arg1108Cys 1.29 0.81 6 b Leu1430fs 0.37 0.6 2 b Arg2077Trp 26.89 0.93 4 b a When analyzed as groups, A alleles have significantly milder effects on both visual acuity (P , 1023 ) and visual field (P , 1027 ) than B alleles (see text). Login to comment

[hide] Outcome of ABCA4 microarray screening in routine c... Mol Vis. 2009 Dec 20;15:2841-7. Ernest PJ, Boon CJ, Klevering BJ, Hoefsloot LH, Hoyng CB
Outcome of ABCA4 microarray screening in routine clinical practice.
Mol Vis. 2009 Dec 20;15:2841-7., [PMID:20029649]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of patients who were screened for mutations with the ATP-binding cassette transporter gene ABCA4 (ABCA4) microarray in a routine clinical DNA diagnostics setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical charts of 65 patients who underwent an ABCA4 microarray screening between the years 2002 and 2006. An additional denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was performed in these patients if less than two mutations were found with the microarray. We included all patients who were suspected of autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1), autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy (arCRD), or autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa at the time of microarray request. After a retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics, the patients who were suspected of STGD1 were categorized as having either a typical or atypical form of STGD1, according to the age at onset, fundus appearance, fluorescein angiography, and electroretinography. The occurrence of typical clinical features for STGD1 was compared between patients with different numbers of discovered mutations. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients who were suspected of STGD1, 26 patients (59%) had sufficient data available for a classification in either typical (six patients; 23%) or atypical (20 patients; 77%) STGD1. In the suspected STGD1 group, 59% of all expected pathogenic alleles were found with the ABCA4 microarray. DGGE led to the finding of 12 more mutations, resulting in an overall detection rate of 73%. Thirty-one percent of patients with two or three discovered ABCA4 mutations met all typical STGD1 criteria. An age at onset younger than 25 years and a dark choroid on fluorescein angiography were the most predictive clinical features to find ABCA4 mutations in patients suspected of STGD1. In 18 patients suspected of arCRD, microarray screening detected 22% of the possible pathogenic alleles. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to confirmation of the diagnosis in typical STGD1, ABCA4 microarray screening is usually requested in daily clinical practice to strengthen the diagnosis when the disease is atypical. This study supports the view that the efficiency and accuracy of ABCA4 microarray screening are directly dependent upon the clinical features of the patients who are screened.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
143 DISCOVERED MUTATIONS IN THE ABCA4 GENE IN THE PATIENTS INCLUDED IN THIS STUDY Nucleotide change Effect Alleles References Mutations already included in the ABCA4 microarray c.286A>G p.Asn96Asp 2 [25] c.656G>C p.Arg219Thr 1 [10] c.740A>T p.Asn247Ile 1 This study* c.768G>T splice site 7 [13] c.899C>A p.Thr300Asn 1 [14] c.1805G>A p.Arg602Gln 1 [9] c.1822T>A p.Phe608Ile 2 [13] c.1853G>A p.Gly618Glu 1 [19] c.1938-1G>A splice site 1 [26] c.2588G>C p.DelGly863/Gly863Ala 8 [13] c.2919del exons20-22 deletion/frameshift 2 [13] c.3335C>A p.Thr1112Asn 1 [13] c.3874C>T p.Gln1292X 1 This study* c.3899G>A p.Arg1300Gln 1 [27] c.4297G>A p.Val1433Ile 1 [17] c.4462T>C p.Cys1488Arg 1 [17] c.4506C>A p.Cys1502X 1 This study* c.4539+1G>T splice site 1 [28] c.4774+1G>A splice site 1 [1] c.5161-5162delAC p.Thr1721fs 1 [27] c.5337C>A p.Tyr1779X 1 This study* c.5461-10T>C unknown 9 [9] c.5537T>C p.Ile1846Thr 1 [13] c.5693G>A p.Arg1898His 1 [1] c.5715+5G>A splice site 2 [28] c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu 10 [1] c.6088C>T p.Arg2030X 1 [14] c.6089G>A p.Arg2030Gln 1 [9] c.6238-6239delTC p.Ser2080fs 1 [29] c.6529G>A p.Asp2177Asn 1 [1] New mutations found with DGGE analysis c.303+4A>C splice site 1 c.872C>T p.Pro291Leu 1 c.2906A>G p.Lys969Arg 1 c.2947A>G p.Thr983Ala 1 c.3233G>A p.Gly1078Glu 1 c.3305A>T p.Asp1102Val 1 c.4353+1G>A splice site 1 c.5113C>T p.Arg1705Trp 1 c.5762_5763dup p.Ala1922fs 1 c.6411T>A p.Cys2137X 1 Total 74 Mutations are designated by their nucleotide change, followed by their effect on the protein and the number of alleles that were found with the mutation. Login to comment

[hide] An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89. Webster AR, Heon E, Lotery AJ, Vandenburgh K, Casavant TL, Oh KT, Beck G, Fishman GA, Lam BL, Levin A, Heckenlively JR, Jacobson SG, Weleber RG, Sheffield VC, Stone EM
An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89., [PMID:11328725]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To assess the allelic variation of the ATP-binding transporter protein (ABCA4). METHODS: A combination of single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and automated DNA sequencing was used to systematically screen this gene for sequence variations in 374 unrelated probands with a clinical diagnosis of Stargardt disease, 182 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 96 normal subjects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of any single variant or class of variant between the control and AMD groups. In contrast, truncating variants, amino acid substitutions, synonymous codon changes, and intronic variants were significantly enriched in patients with Stargardt disease when compared with their presence in subjects without Stargardt disease (Kruskal-Wallis P < 0.0001 for each variant group). Overall, there were 2480 instances of 213 different variants in the ABCA4 gene, including 589 instances of 97 amino acid substitutions, and 45 instances of 33 truncating variants. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 97 amino acid substitutions, 11 occurred at a frequency that made them unlikely to be high-penetrance recessive disease-causing variants (HPRDCV). After accounting for variants in cis, one or more changes that were compatible with HPRDCV were found on 35% of all Stargardt-associated alleles overall. The nucleotide diversity of the ABCA4 coding region, a collective measure of the number and prevalence of polymorphic sites in a region of DNA, was found to be 1.28, a value that is 9 to 400 times greater than that of two other macular disease genes that were examined in a similar fashion (VMD2 and EFEMP1).

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
102 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 2 160 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 Ͻ0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n ‫؍‬ 182) Control (n ‫؍‬ 96) STGD (n ‫؍‬ 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 Ͻ0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4353 - 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 Ͻ0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 30 4539 ϩ 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 Ͻ0.01 39 5584 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 Ͻ0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 40 5714 ϩ 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu Ͻ0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 Ͻ0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 Ͻ0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 Ͻ0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 Ͻ0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 Ͻ0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 48 6729 ϩ 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 Ͻ0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment
103 Thirty-Three Truncated and 98 Amino Acid-Changing Variants in the ABCA4 Gene Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 2 106delT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 2 160 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 3 161G 3 A Cys54Tyr NS 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 3 179C 3 T Ala60Val NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 194G 3 A Gly65Glu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 223T 3 G Cys75Gly NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 247delCAAA FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 3 298C 3 T Ser100Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 5 454C 3 T Arg152Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 574G 3 A Ala192Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 618C 3 G Ser206Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 6 634C 3 T Arg212Cys 0.02 Yes 0 0 7 0.01 6 635G 3 A Arg212His NS 2 2 6 0.01 6 658C 3 T Arg220Cys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 6 661delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 666delAAAGACGGTGC 6 GC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 6 746A 3 C Asp249Gly NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 899C 3 A Thr300Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 8 997C 3 T Arg333Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1140T 3 A Asn380Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 9 1222C 3 T Arg408Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1268A 3 G His423Arg NS 1 0 7 0.01 10 1335C 3 G Ser445Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 10 1344delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 11 1411G 3 A Glu471Lys NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 11 1513delATCAC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 12 1622T 3 C Leu541Pro 0.001 Yes 0 0 11 0.01 13 1804C 3 T Arg602Trp NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 13 1805G 3 A Arg602Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1819G 3 T Gly607Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1823T 3 A Phe608Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 13 1927G 3 A Val643Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 1989G 3 T Trp663Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 14 2005delAT FS NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 14 2041C 3 T Arg681Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 14 2147C 3 T Thr716Met NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2291G 3 A Cys764Tyr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2294G 3 A Ser765Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 15 2300T 3 A Val767Asp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 16 2385del16bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2453G 3 A Gly818Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2461T 3 A Trp821Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2546T 3 C Val849Ala NS 0 0 4 b0d;0.01 16 2552G 3 A Gly851Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 16 2560G 3 A Ala854Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 17 2588G 3 C Gly863Ala 0.0006 No 2 2 28 0.02 17 2617T 3 C Phe873Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2690C 3 T Thr897Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 18 2701A 3 G Thr901Ala NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 18 2703A 3 G Thr901Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 19 2828G 3 A Arg943Gln NS 20 13 37 0.05 19 2883delC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2894A 3 G Asn965Ser NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 19 2912C 3 A Thr971Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 19 2915C 3 A Thr972Asn NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2920T 3 C Ser974Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 2966T 3 C Val989Ala NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 20 2977del8bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 20 3041T 3 G Leu1014Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3055A 3 G Thr1019Ala NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3064G 3 A Glu1022Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3091A 3 G Lys1031Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 21 3113G 3 T Ala1038Val 0.001 Yes 1 0 17 0.01 22 3205insAA FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 22 3261G 3 A Glu1087Lys NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 22 3322C 3 T Arg1108Cys 0.04 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 22 3323G 3 A Arg1108His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 23 3364G 3 A Glu1122Lys NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (continues) Exon Nucleotide Change Effect (A) (B) AMD (n d1d; 182) Control (n d1d; 96) STGD (n d1d; 374) Allele Prevalence 23 3386G 3 T Arg1129Leu NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 24 3531C 3 A Cys1158Stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 25 3749T 3 C Leu1250Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 26 3835delGATTCT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 27 3940C 3 A Pro1314Thr NS 0 1 0 b0d;0.01 28 4139C 3 T Pro1380Leu 0.001 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 28 4222T 3 C Trp1408Arg NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4223G 3 T Trp1408Leu NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 28 4234C 3 T Gln1412stop NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 29 4297G 3 A Val1433Ile NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 29 4319T 3 C Phe1440Ser NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4353 afa; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4457C 3 T Pro1486Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4462T 3 C Cys1488Arg NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4463G 3 T Cys1488Phe NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 30 4469G 3 A Cys1490Tyr NS 0 0 3 b0d;0.01 30 4531insC FS NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 32 4538A 3 G Gln1513Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 30 4539 af9; 1g 3 t Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 31 4574T 3 C Leu1525Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 33 4733delGTTT FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 4859delATAACAinsTCC 35 T FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 4909G 3 A Ala1637Thr NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4918C 3 T Arg1640Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4919G 3 A Arg1640Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 35 4954T 3 G Tyr1652Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5077G 3 A Val1693Ile NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5186T 3 C Leu1729Pro NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 36 5206T 3 C Ser1736Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 36 5212del11bp FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5225delTGGTGGTGGGC FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 del LPA 37 5278del9bp 1760 NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 37 5288delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5395A 3 G Asn1799Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 38 5451T 3 G Asp1817Glu NS 1 0 4 b0d;0.01 39 5584 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site 0.02 Yes 0 0 6 b0d;0.01 40 5603A 3 T Asn1868Ile 0.0006 No 20 7 79 0.08 40 5651T 3 A Val1884GLu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5657G 3 A Gly1886Glu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5687T 3 A Val1896Asp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5693G 3 A Arg1898His NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 40 5714 af9; 5g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 42 5843CA 3 TG Pro1948Leu NS 11 7 28 0.04 42 5882G 3 A Gly1961Glu b0d;0.0001 Yes 1 0 43 0.03 43 5908C 3 T Leu1970Phe NS 1 0 1 b0d;0.01 43 5917delG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6079C 3 T Leu2027Phe 0.01 Yes 0 0 9 0.01 44 6088C 3 T Arg2030Stop NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 44 6089G 3 A Arg2030Gln NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 44 6112A 3 T Arg2038Trp NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6148A 3 C Val2050Leu NS 1 0 0 b0d;0.01 46 6212A 3 T Tyr2071Phe NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 45 6229C 3 T Arg2077Trp NS 0 0 2 b0d;0.01 46 6320G 3 A Arg2107His 0.01 Yes 0 0 10 0.01 46 6383A 3 G His2128Arg NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6446G 3 T Arg2149Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 47 6449G 3 A Cys2150Tyr NS 0 0 5 b0d;0.01 48 6529G 3 A Asp2177Asn NS 2 0 0 b0d;0.01 48 6686T 3 C Leu2229Pro NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6707delTCACACAG FS NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 48 6729 af9; 1g 3 a Splice site NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 49 6764G 3 T Ser2255Ile 0.009 No 16 4 54 0.06 49 6788G 3 T Arg2263Leu NS 0 0 1 b0d;0.01 (A) The probability under the null hypothesis of similar prevalence of each variant in Stargardt (STGD) compared with non-STGD alleles (two-tailed Fisher`s exact test); (B) compatability of the variant existing in a ratio of 100:1 in STGD to control alleles, calculated using the binomial distribution. Login to comment

[hide] Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-spe... Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34. Lewis RA, Shroyer NF, Singh N, Allikmets R, Hutchinson A, Li Y, Lupski JR, Leppert M, Dean M
Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter gene, ABCR, in Stargardt disease.
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34., [PMID:9973280]

Abstract [show]
Mutation scanning and direct DNA sequencing of all 50 exons of ABCR were completed for 150 families segregating recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). ABCR variations were identified in 173 (57%) disease chromosomes, the majority of which represent missense amino acid substitutions. These ABCR variants were not found in 220 unaffected control individuals (440 chromosomes) but do cosegregate with the disease in these families with STGD1, and many occur in conserved functional domains. Missense amino acid substitutions located in the amino terminal one-third of the protein appear to be associated with earlier onset of the disease and may represent misfolding alleles. The two most common mutant alleles, G1961E and A1038V, each identified in 16 of 173 disease chromosomes, composed 18.5% of mutations identified. G1961E has been associated previously, at a statistically significant level in the heterozygous state, with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Clinical evaluation of these 150 families with STGD1 revealed a high frequency of AMD in first- and second-degree relatives. These findings support the hypothesis that compound heterozygous ABCR mutations are responsible for STGD1 and that some heterozygous ABCR mutations may enhance susceptibility to AMD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
76 2 0071GrA R24H 1 19 2894ArG N965S 3 36 5196ϩ1GrA Splice 2 3 0161GrA C54Y 1 21 3113CrT A1038V 16 5196ϩ2TrC Splice 1 0179CrT A60V 1 22 3211insGT FS 1 37 5281del9 PAL1761del 1 0203CrG P68R 1 3212CrT S1071L 1 38 5459GrC R1820P 1 0223TrG C75G 1 3215TrC V1072A 1 39 5512CrT H1838Y 1 6 0634CrT R212C 1 3259GrA E1087K 1 5527CrT R1843W 1 0664del13 FS 1 3322CrT R1108C 6 40 5585-1GrA Splice 1 0746ArG D249G 1 23 3364GrA E1122K 1 5657GrA G1886E 1 8 1007CrG S336C 1 3385GrT R1129C 1 5693GrA R1898H 4 1018TrG Y340D 1 3386GrT R1129L 2 5714ϩ5GrA Splice 8 11 1411GrA E471K 1 24 3602TrG L1201R 1 42 5882GrA G1961E 16 12 1569TrG D523E 1 25 3610GrA D1204N 1 5898ϩ1GrT Splice 3 1622TrC L541P 1 28 4139CrT P1380L 4 43 5908CrT L1970F 1 1715GrA R572Q 2 4216CrT H1406Y 1 5929GrA G1977S 1 1715GrC R572P 1 4222TrC W1408R 4 6005ϩ1GrT Splice 1 13 1804CrT R602W 1 4232insTATG FS 1 44 6079CrT L2027F 11 1822TrA F608I 2 4253ϩ5GrT Splice 1 6088CrT R2030X 1 1917CrA Y639X 1 29 4297GrA V1433I 1 6089GrA R2030Q 1 1933GrA D645N 1 4316GrA G1439D 2 6112CrT R2038W 1 14 2005delAT FS 1 4319TrC F1440S 1 45 6148GrC V2050L 2 2090GrA W697X 1 4346GrA W1449X 1 6166ArT K2056X 1 2160ϩ1GrC Splice 1 30a 4462TrC C1488R 2 6229CrT R2077W 1 16 2453GrA G818E 1 4457CrT P1486L 1 46 6286GrA E2096K 1 2461TrA W821R 1 30b 4469GrA C1490Y 3 6316CrT R2106C 1 2536GrC D846H 1 4539ϩ1GrT Splice 1 47 6391GrA E2131K 1 2552GrC G851D 1 31 4577CrT T1526M 7 6415CrT R2139W 1 17 2588GrC G863A 11 4594GrA D1532N 3 6445CrT R2149X 1 19 2791GrA V931M 2 35 4947delC FS 1 48 6543del36 1181del12 1 2827CrT R943W 1 36 5041del15 VVAIC1681del 2 6709insG FS 1 2884delC FS 1 5087GrA S1696N 1 NOTE.-FS ϭ frameshift. Login to comment
149 Two compound heterozygous families, AR335 and AR341, had both mutations in the same exon (F608I/D645N in exon 13 and P1380L/W1408R in exon 28, respectively) and had an early age at onset of 6 years. Login to comment
77 2 0071GrA R24H 1 19 2894ArG N965S 3 36 5196af9;1GrA Splice 2 3 0161GrA C54Y 1 21 3113CrT A1038V 16 5196af9;2TrC Splice 1 0179CrT A60V 1 22 3211insGT FS 1 37 5281del9 PAL1761del 1 0203CrG P68R 1 3212CrT S1071L 1 38 5459GrC R1820P 1 0223TrG C75G 1 3215TrC V1072A 1 39 5512CrT H1838Y 1 6 0634CrT R212C 1 3259GrA E1087K 1 5527CrT R1843W 1 0664del13 FS 1 3322CrT R1108C 6 40 5585afa;1GrA Splice 1 0746ArG D249G 1 23 3364GrA E1122K 1 5657GrA G1886E 1 8 1007CrG S336C 1 3385GrT R1129C 1 5693GrA R1898H 4 1018TrG Y340D 1 3386GrT R1129L 2 5714af9;5GrA Splice 8 11 1411GrA E471K 1 24 3602TrG L1201R 1 42 5882GrA G1961E 16 12 1569TrG D523E 1 25 3610GrA D1204N 1 5898af9;1GrT Splice 3 1622TrC L541P 1 28 4139CrT P1380L 4 43 5908CrT L1970F 1 1715GrA R572Q 2 4216CrT H1406Y 1 5929GrA G1977S 1 1715GrC R572P 1 4222TrC W1408R 4 6005af9;1GrT Splice 1 13 1804CrT R602W 1 4232insTATG FS 1 44 6079CrT L2027F 11 1822TrA F608I 2 4253af9;5GrT Splice 1 6088CrT R2030X 1 1917CrA Y639X 1 29 4297GrA V1433I 1 6089GrA R2030Q 1 1933GrA D645N 1 4316GrA G1439D 2 6112CrT R2038W 1 14 2005delAT FS 1 4319TrC F1440S 1 45 6148GrC V2050L 2 2090GrA W697X 1 4346GrA W1449X 1 6166ArT K2056X 1 2160af9;1GrC Splice 1 30a 4462TrC C1488R 2 6229CrT R2077W 1 16 2453GrA G818E 1 4457CrT P1486L 1 46 6286GrA E2096K 1 2461TrA W821R 1 30b 4469GrA C1490Y 3 6316CrT R2106C 1 2536GrC D846H 1 4539af9;1GrT Splice 1 47 6391GrA E2131K 1 2552GrC G851D 1 31 4577CrT T1526M 7 6415CrT R2139W 1 17 2588GrC G863A 11 4594GrA D1532N 3 6445CrT R2149X 1 19 2791GrA V931M 2 35 4947delC FS 1 48 6543del36 1181del12 1 2827CrT R943W 1 36 5041del15 VVAIC1681del 2 6709insG FS 1 2884delC FS 1 5087GrA S1696N 1 NOTE.-FS afd; frameshift. Login to comment
150 Two compound heterozygous families, AR335 and AR341, had both mutations in the same exon (F608I/D645N in exon 13 and P1380L/W1408R in exon 28, respectively) and had an early age at onset of 6 years. Login to comment

[hide] Inner and outer retinal changes in retinal degener... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Mar 20;55(3):1810-22. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13768. Huang WC, Cideciyan AV, Roman AJ, Sumaroka A, Sheplock R, Schwartz SB, Stone EM, Jacobson SG
Inner and outer retinal changes in retinal degenerations associated with ABCA4 mutations.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Mar 20;55(3):1810-22. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13768., [PMID:24550365]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To investigate in vivo inner and outer retinal microstructure and effects of structural abnormalities on visual function in patients with retinal degeneration caused by ABCA4 mutations (ABCA4-RD). METHODS: Patients with ABCA4-RD (n = 45; age range, 9-71 years) were studied by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans extending from the fovea to 30 degrees eccentricity along horizontal and vertical meridians. Thicknesses of outer and inner retinal laminae were analyzed. Serial OCT measurements available over a mean period of 4 years (range, 2-8 years) allowed examination of the progression of outer and inner retinal changes. A subset of patients had dark-adapted chromatic static threshold perimetry. RESULTS: There was a spectrum of photoreceptor layer thickness changes from localized central retinal abnormalities to extensive thinning across central and near midperipheral retina. The inner retina also showed changes. There was thickening of the inner nuclear layer (INL) that was mainly associated with regions of photoreceptor loss. Serial data documented only limited change in some patients while others showed an increase in outer nuclear layer (ONL) thinning accompanied by increased INL thickening in some regions imaged. Visual function in regions both with and without INL thickening was describable with a previously defined model based on photoreceptor quantum catch. CONCLUSIONS: Inner retinal laminar abnormalities, as in other human photoreceptor diseases, can be a feature of ABCA4-RD. These changes are likely due to the retinal remodeling that accompanies photoreceptor loss. Rod photoreceptor-mediated visual loss in retinal regionswith inner laminopathy at the stages studied did not exceed the prediction from photoreceptor loss alone.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
74 Characteristics of the ABCA4-Related Retinal Disease Patients Patient Age at Visits, y Sex Allele 1 Allele 2 Previous Report*ߤ P1 9, 12 M E341G F608I P2 9, 15 M R681X C2150Y P28* P3ߥ 12 M N965S W821R P1ߤ P4 13, 16 M V256V T1526M P21*, P15ߤ P5 14, 20 F W1408R IVS40&#fe;5 G>A P49* P6ߥ 16 F V989A IVS28&#fe;5 G>T P17ߤ P7ߥ 16 M N965S W821R P18ߤ P8 18, 20 F Y362X IVS38-10 T>C P9ߥ 18 F V989A IVS28&#fe;5 G>T P10 18, 22 M G1961E R1129L P3ߤ P11 20 M R1640Q c.5174_5175insG P12ߥ 20 M G1961E G1961E/P68L P13 22, 25 M G863A IVS35&#fe;2 T>C P20ߤ P14 22, 24 F G1961E R152X P12*, P21ߤ P15ߥ 23 M G1961E G1961E/P68L P16 25, 27 M G1961E R152X P11* P17 26, 32 F L1940P R1129L P64* P18 27, 34 F R1925G A1038V/L541P P19 27, 29 M c.4530_4531insC R1705Q P52*, P5ߤ P20 28, 30 F G1961E A1038V/L541P P23ߤ P21 31, 35 M T1019M G1961E P34* P22ߥ 32, 37 M P1486L Deletion of exon 7 P25ߤ P23 33, 35 M G863A R1108C P29*, P6ߤ P24 34, 37 F IVS40&#fe;5 G>A V935A P32*, P7ߤ P25 34 M G1961E &#a7; P8ߤ P26 37, 43 F C54Y G863A P4* P27 39, 44 F G863A C1490Y P30*, P26ߤ P28 40 M G1961E C54Y P7*, P10ߤ P29 41 F IVS38-10 T>C E1087D P59* P30ߥ 43, 47 F G1961E V256V P23*, P11ߤ P31ߥ 47, 51 F P1486L Deletion of exon 7 P32 47 M Y245X Y245X P20* P33ߥ 48, 51 F G1961E V256V P22*, P12ߤ P34 48, 50 F c.3208_3209insTG IVS40&#fe;5 G>A P35 50, 54 M V1433I L2027F P50* P36ߥ 52, 55 F T1526M R2030Q P55*, P28ߤ P37 53, 59 F G1961E P1380L P47*, P13ߤ P38ߥ 53, 61 M L1940P IVS40&#fe;5 G>A P61* P39 58 M D600E R18W P2*, P14ߤ P40 59, 62 M E1122K G1961E P44* P41 59, 62 F R1640Q G1961E P58* P42ߥ 62 F T1526M R2030Q P54* P43ߥ 64, 68 M L1940P IVS40&#fe;5 G>A P62* P44 68 F R1108C IVS40&#fe;5 G>A P42* P45 71 F IVS38-10 T>C &#a7; Novel variants are bold and italicized. Login to comment

[hide] Foveal sparing in Stargardt disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Oct 16;55(11):7467-78. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13825. van Huet RA, Bax NM, Westeneng-Van Haaften SC, Muhamad M, Zonneveld-Vrieling MN, Hoefsloot LH, Cremers FP, Boon CJ, Klevering BJ, Hoyng CB
Foveal sparing in Stargardt disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Oct 16;55(11):7467-78. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13825., [PMID:25324290]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To provide a clinical and genetic description of a patient cohort with Stargardt disease (STGD1) with identifiable foveal sparing. METHODS: Patients with retinal atrophy (defined as an absence of autofluorescence) that surrounded the fovea by at least 180 degrees and did not include the fovea were defined as having foveal sparing; eyes with visual acuity (VA) worse than 20/200 were excluded. We reviewed the medical files and extracted data regarding medical history, VA, ophthalmoscopy, static perimetry, fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and electroretinography (ERG). We screened each patient's ABCA4 gene for mutations. RESULTS: Seventeen eyes with foveal sparing were identified in 13 unrelated patients. In 4 eyes, the fovea gradually became atrophic after the initial foveal sparing. The mean age at onset was 51 years (range, 32-67 years). Visual acuity was 20/40 or better in all foveal sparing eyes and was 20/25 or better in 41%. Fundus autofluorescence imaging revealed hyperautofluorescent flecks and parafoveal retinal atrophy; SD-OCT revealed sharply delineated atrophy; and perimetry revealed parafoveal scotomas with intact foveal sensitivity. Finally, genetic screening identified mutations in 19 of the 26 ABCA4 gene alleles. CONCLUSIONS: Foveal sparing occurs mainly in patients with late-onset STGD1 and represents the milder end of the clinical spectrum in STGD1. The anatomy, metabolism, and biochemistry of the retina, as well as genetic variations in genes other than ABCA4, can influence the etiology of foveal sparing. Identifying these fovea-protecting factors will facilitate the future development of strategies designed to treat STGD1.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
114 ABCA4 Mutations in STGD1 Patients With Foveal Sparing Allele 1 Allele 2 References DNA Variant Effect DNA Variant Effect P1 c.5461-10TC Unknown NI NA 35, 36 P2 c.3113CT p.Ala1038Val c.3874CT p.Gln1292* 16, 37, 38, 58 P3 c.5461-10TC Unknown c.5537TC p.Ile1846Thr 23, 35, 39, 58 P4 c.4363TC p.Cys1455Arg NI NA 40 P5 c.1822TA p.Phe608Ile c.4685TC p.Ile1562Thr 23, 40, 41, 59 P6 c.768GT Splice defect c.3113CT p.Ala1038Val 16, 23, 37 P7 c.5196&#fe;1GT Splice defect NI NA 45, 58 P8 c.3874CT p.Gln1292* NI NA 38 P9 c.5461-10TC Unknown NI NA 35, 58 P10 c.1822TA p.Phe608Ile NI NA 23, 41 P11 c.286AG p.Asn96Asp NI NA 43 P12 c.1805GA p.Arg602Gln c.4462TC p.Cys1488Arg 37, 39, 42-44 P13 c.3874CT p.Gln1292* c.1928TG p.Val643Gly 38, 45 NI, not identified; NA, not applicable. Login to comment
151 ABCA4 Mutations in STGD1 Patients With Foveal Sparing Allele 1 Allele 2 References DNA Variant Effect DNA Variant Effect P1 c.5461-10TC Unknown NI NA 35, 36 P2 c.3113CT p.Ala1038Val c.3874CT p.Gln1292* 16, 37, 38, 58 P3 c.5461-10TC Unknown c.5537TC p.Ile1846Thr 23, 35, 39, 58 P4 c.4363TC p.Cys1455Arg NI NA 40 P5 c.1822TA p.Phe608Ile c.4685TC p.Ile1562Thr 23, 40, 41, 59 P6 c.768GT Splice defect c.3113CT p.Ala1038Val 16, 23, 37 P7 c.5196&#fe;1GT Splice defect NI NA 45, 58 P8 c.3874CT p.Gln1292* NI NA 38 P9 c.5461-10TC Unknown NI NA 35, 58 P10 c.1822TA p.Phe608Ile NI NA 23, 41 P11 c.286AG p.Asn96Asp NI NA 43 P12 c.1805GA p.Arg602Gln c.4462TC p.Cys1488Arg 37, 39, 42-44 P13 c.3874CT p.Gln1292* c.1928TG p.Val643Gly 38, 45 NI, not identified; NA, not applicable. Login to comment

[hide] Early-onset stargardt disease: phenotypic and geno... Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Oct 17. Lambertus S, van Huet RA, Bax NM, Hoefsloot LH, Cremers FP, Boon CJ, Klevering BJ, Hoyng CB
Early-onset stargardt disease: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Oct 17., [PMID:25444351]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: To describe the phenotype and genotype of patients with early-onset Stargardt disease. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one Stargardt patients with age at onset </=10 years. METHODS: We reviewed patient medical records for age at onset, medical history, initial symptoms, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (FA), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and full-field electroretinography (ffERG). The ABCA4 gene was screened for mutations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age at onset, BCVA, fundus appearance, FAF, FA, SD-OCT, ffERG, and presence of ABCA4 mutations. RESULTS: The mean age at onset was 7.2 years (range, 1-10). The median times to develop BCVA of 20/32, 20/80, 20/200, and 20/500 were 3, 5, 12, and 23 years, respectively. Initial ophthalmoscopy in 41 patients revealed either no abnormalities or foveal retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes in 10 and 9 patients, respectively; the other 22 patients had foveal atrophy, atrophic RPE lesions, and/or irregular yellow-white fundus flecks. On FA, there was a "dark choroid" in 21 out of 29 patients. In 14 out of 50 patients, foveal atrophy occurred before flecks developed. On FAF, there was centrifugal expansion of disseminated atrophic spots, which progressed to the eventual profound chorioretinal atrophy. Spectral-domain OCT revealed early photoreceptor damage followed by atrophy of the outer retina, RPE, and choroid. On ffERG in 26 patients, 15 had normal amplitudes, and 11 had reduced photopic and/or scotopic amplitudes at their first visit. We found no correlation between ffERG abnormalities and the rate of vision loss. Thirteen out of 25 patients had progressive ffERG abnormalities. Finally, genetic screening of 44 patients revealed >/=2 ABCA4 mutations in 37 patients and single heterozygous mutations in 7. CONCLUSIONS: In early-onset Stargardt, initial ophthalmoscopy can reveal no abnormalities or minor retinal abnormalities. Yellow-white flecks can be preceded by foveal atrophy and may be visible only on FAF. Although ffERG is insufficient for predicting the rate of vision loss, abnormalities can develop. Over time, visual acuity declines rapidly in parallel with progressive retinal degeneration, resulting in profound chorioretinal atrophy. Thus, early-onset Stargardt lies at the severe end of the spectrum of ABCA4-associated retinal phenotypes.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
115 Fundus photographs and autofluorescence (FAF) imaging of patient 37 (age at onset, 8 years; ABCA4 genotype: p.Phe608Ile and p.Gly1961Glu) at 15 (A1,2) and 22 years (B1,2) of age, showing isolated foveal pigment alterations and a hypoautofluorescent lesion (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], 0.52 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], Snellen 20/66). Login to comment
137 11 13 16, 23, 32, 39 c.818G>A p.Trp273* 1 1 This study c.872C>T p.Pro291Leu 1 1 34 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro 2 2 1, 16, 32, 40 c.1822T>A p.Phe608Ile 4 5 1, 23 c.1957C>T p.Arg653Cys 1 1 32, 41 c.2588G>C p.Gly863Ala/p.DelGly863 3 4 16, 18, 23, 32, 42 c.2919-?_3328&#fe;?del p.Ser974_Gly1110delinsCys 2 2 23 c.2947A>G p.Thr983Ala 3 4 34 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val 2 2 16, 31, 32, 40, 43 c.3335C>A p.Thr1112Asn 1 1 23 c.3449G>A p.Cys1150Tyr 1 1 This study c.3813G>C p.Glu1271Asp 1 1 This study c.3874C>T p.Gln1292* 1 1 34 c.4224G>T p.Trp1408Cys 1 1 This study c.4462T>C p.Cys1488Arg 1 1 1, 8, 44, 45 c.4506C>A p.Cys1502* 1 1 34 c.4539&#fe;1G>T p.? Login to comment