ABCMdb

ABCA4 p.Arg1098Cys

Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (71%), C: D (71%), D: D (75%), E: D (75%), F: D (71%), G: D (71%), H: D (63%), I: D (71%), K: N (61%), L: D (71%), M: D (71%), N: D (59%), P: D (75%), Q: D (63%), S: D (63%), T: D (59%), V: D (71%), W: D (80%), Y: D (66%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: D, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Correlation between photoreceptor layer integrity ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 3;53(8):4409-15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8201. Print 2012 Jul. Testa F, Rossi S, Sodi A, Passerini I, Di Iorio V, Della Corte M, Banfi S, Surace EM, Menchini U, Auricchio A, Simonelli F
Correlation between photoreceptor layer integrity and visual function in patients with Stargardt disease: implications for gene therapy.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 3;53(8):4409-15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8201. Print 2012 Jul., [PMID:22661472]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To perform a clinical characterization of Stargardt patients with ABCA4 gene mutation, and to investigate the correlation between the inner and outer segment (IS/OS) junction morphology and visual acuity, fundus lesions, electroretinogram abnormalities, and macular sensitivity. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with Stargardt disease (STGD) were given a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. Inner-outer photoreceptor junction morphology evaluated by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was correlated with visual acuity, fundus lesions, fundus autofluorescence, full-field and multifocal electroretinography responses, and microperimetric macular sensitivities. We classified STGD patients into three groups: (1) IS/OS junction disorganization in the fovea, (2) IS/OS junction loss in the fovea, and (3) extensive loss of IS/OS junction. Mutation analysis of the ABCA4 gene was carried out by sequencing the complete coding region. RESULTS: A significant difference in visual acuity was observed between IS/OS groups 1 and 2 and between IS/OS groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.0001). A significant difference in microperimetry sensitivity was observed between IS/OS groups 2 and 3, and between IS/OS groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.0001). There was also a statistically significant correlation between IS/OS abnormalities and the extent of fundus lesions (Spearman P </= 0.01), as well as with the type of ERG and multifocal ERG results (Spearman P </= 0.01). Finally, the degree of IS/OS junction preservation showed a statistically significant correlation with the extension of foveal abnormalities assessed by fundus autofluorescence imaging (Spearman P </= 0.01). The G1961E mutation was more frequent in the patients without extensive loss of IS/OS junction (P = 0.01) confirming its association with a milder STGD phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a comprehensive approach in the examination of Stargardt patients has the potential to improve the understanding of vision loss and may provide a sensitive measure to evaluate the efficacy of future experimental therapies in patients with STGD.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
66 Clinical and Molecular Data of STGD Patients Patient ID/Fam Age (y) Visual Acuity OCT ft (lm) MP (dB) IS/OS* Fundus† FAF‡ ERG§ mfERGjj Mutation 1 Mutation 2 4/2 50 0.0715 134 5.25 - 1 - 2 4 G1961E 250InsCAAA 5/2 47 0.1 127 14.2 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E 250InsCAAA 6/3 33 0.05 125 9.8 2 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2149X 7/4 18 0.085 135 0 - 2 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 8/5 16 0.095 104 0.9 3 2 3 3 4 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 9/6 71 0.03 109 0 3 3 3 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 11/7 46 0.2 137 9.35 2 1 2 1 1 Y850K A1598D 13/8 35 0.017 163 0 - 3 - 3 4 L541P R1098C 15/10 20 0.1 135.5 11.05 2 1 1 1 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 16/11 20 0.47 96 16.7 2 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 17/11 34 0.1 114.5 7.55 2 1 2 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 18/11 18 1 134 16.15 1 1 1 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 19/12 12 0.12 242 6.5 3 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 20/13 28 0.1 111 14.2 2 2 2 1 3 R1443H IVS35þ2t > c 21/14 34 0.2 152 14.15 2 1 2 2 4 R653C G1961E 22/15 69 0.079 122 0 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T R2149X 23/15 46 0.55 162 1.05 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T IVS45þ1g > c 25/16 28 0.11 105.5 3.1 3 2 2 3 4 R212C R212C 26/17 13 0.084 138.5 0.2 3 2 3 1 3 R18W C1490Y 27/4 20 0.0775 131 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 28/4 23 0.042 159.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 30/18 29 0.0375 103 0 3 3 3 3 4 N965S G1961E 31/19 17 0.1 102 9 3 2 2 3 4 L541P F655C 38/20 20 0.225 95 16 2 1 1 3 4 L541P G1961E 39/21 20 0.17 146 16.7 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E R2030X 42/22 43 0.575 127 7.05 2 1 2 1 2 250insCAAA G1961E 43/23 12 0.1 117.5 11.55 2 2 2 1 3 IVS40þ5g > a IVS15-8g > a 44/24 29 0.1 149 18.5 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E 4736del6bpins2bp 46/25 38 0.0075 182.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 G618R G1972R 48/26 35 0.46 133.5 12.25 2 1 - 1 3 4538insC G1961E 50/27 13 0.2 122.5 17.35 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 51/28 24 0.065 123 0 3 3 3 3 4 250InsCAAA V767D 52/29 14 1 147 6.15 1 1 1 3 4 L2027F A1881V 53/30 45 0.1 120 6.05 3 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2030X 54/30 24 0.09 159 2.65 3 3 3 3 4 V767D R2030X 55/31 34 0.085 150 5.15 3 3 3 3 4 N96H IVS40þ5g > a 56/32 48 0.0335 118.5 4.4 - 3 - 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 58/32 52 0.05 124 5.8 3 2 2 2 4 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 60/33 43 0.065 163 15.95 2 1 - 1 2 250InsCAAA G1961E 61/34 45 0.03 187.5 4.5 1 1 1 2 1 R1640Q G1961E 64/35 33 0.0665 158 0 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 65/35 38 0.008 172 0.05 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 66/36 42 0.4 137 0.95 3 2 2 1 3 N96D IVS40þ5g > a 67/37 14 0.235 132 0.15 3 2 3 3 4 IVS6-2a > t IVS6-2a > t 69/38 19 0.09 120 0 3 1 2 1 3 R511H N529S 70/39 42 0.515 140 0.4 3 3 3 3 4 IVS40þ5g > a N965S 72/40 33 0.096 116.5 5.1 3 2 2 1 3 N96D L2140Q 73/41 17 0.1 160 14.35 2 2 2 3 4 G690D A1598D 74/42 36 0.0125 142.5 0 3 3 3 3 4 N96H N96H 75/43 45 0.2 214.5 11.7 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c G1961E 77/44 19 0.34 137.5 11.75 2 1 - 1 3 G1961E G618R 81/45 66 0.335 163 2 - 3 - 2 4 N96D G1961E 82/46 41 0.1 116.5 0.15 3 3 3 3 4 4538insC IVS40þ5g > a 83/47 17 0.395 165 19.25 1 1 1 1 2 G1961E IVS45þ1g > c 84/47 26 0.135 120 16.2 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E IVS45þ1g > c 85/48 10 0.16 149.5 12.4 2 2 2 1 3 IVS35þ2t > c IVS40þ5g > a 87/40 25 0.9 155 15 2 1 2 1 2 N96D L2140Q 88/49 32 0.0715 144 0.1 - 3 - 3 4 IVS45þ1g > c R2149X 89/50 14 0.1185 147 1.85 3 1 - 3 4 P402A 250insCAAA 90/51 35 0.07 116.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 A1598D R2030X 94/52 30 0.1 144 12.85 2 1 - 1 1 A1598D G1961E Fam, family; OCT ft, optical coherence tomography foveal thickness; MP, microperimetry; IS/OS, inner-outer segment junction; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; ERG, electroretinogram; mfERG, multifocal-electroretinogram. Login to comment
67 Clinical and Molecular Data of STGD Patients Patient ID/Fam Age (y) Visual Acuity OCT ft (lm) MP (dB) IS/OS* Fundusߤ FAFߥ ERG&#a7; mfERGjj Mutation 1 Mutation 2 4/2 50 0.0715 134 5.25 - 1 - 2 4 G1961E 250InsCAAA 5/2 47 0.1 127 14.2 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E 250InsCAAA 6/3 33 0.05 125 9.8 2 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2149X 7/4 18 0.085 135 0 - 2 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 8/5 16 0.095 104 0.9 3 2 3 3 4 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 9/6 71 0.03 109 0 3 3 3 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 11/7 46 0.2 137 9.35 2 1 2 1 1 Y850K A1598D 13/8 35 0.017 163 0 - 3 - 3 4 L541P R1098C 15/10 20 0.1 135.5 11.05 2 1 1 1 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 16/11 20 0.47 96 16.7 2 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 17/11 34 0.1 114.5 7.55 2 1 2 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 18/11 18 1 134 16.15 1 1 1 1 3 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 19/12 12 0.12 242 6.5 3 1 2 1 2 L541P; A1038V L541P; A1038V 20/13 28 0.1 111 14.2 2 2 2 1 3 R1443H IVS35&#fe;2t > c 21/14 34 0.2 152 14.15 2 1 2 2 4 R653C G1961E 22/15 69 0.079 122 0 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T R2149X 23/15 46 0.55 162 1.05 3 3 3 3 4 I1562T IVS45&#fe;1g > c 25/16 28 0.11 105.5 3.1 3 2 2 3 4 R212C R212C 26/17 13 0.084 138.5 0.2 3 2 3 1 3 R18W C1490Y 27/4 20 0.0775 131 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 28/4 23 0.042 159.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 5917del G 5917del G 30/18 29 0.0375 103 0 3 3 3 3 4 N965S G1961E 31/19 17 0.1 102 9 3 2 2 3 4 L541P F655C 38/20 20 0.225 95 16 2 1 1 3 4 L541P G1961E 39/21 20 0.17 146 16.7 2 1 1 1 3 G1961E R2030X 42/22 43 0.575 127 7.05 2 1 2 1 2 250insCAAA G1961E 43/23 12 0.1 117.5 11.55 2 2 2 1 3 IVS40&#fe;5g > a IVS15-8g > a 44/24 29 0.1 149 18.5 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E 4736del6bpins2bp 46/25 38 0.0075 182.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 G618R G1972R 48/26 35 0.46 133.5 12.25 2 1 - 1 3 4538insC G1961E 50/27 13 0.2 122.5 17.35 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 51/28 24 0.065 123 0 3 3 3 3 4 250InsCAAA V767D 52/29 14 1 147 6.15 1 1 1 3 4 L2027F A1881V 53/30 45 0.1 120 6.05 3 2 2 1 3 G1961E R2030X 54/30 24 0.09 159 2.65 3 3 3 3 4 V767D R2030X 55/31 34 0.085 150 5.15 3 3 3 3 4 N96H IVS40&#fe;5g > a 56/32 48 0.0335 118.5 4.4 - 3 - 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 58/32 52 0.05 124 5.8 3 2 2 2 4 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 60/33 43 0.065 163 15.95 2 1 - 1 2 250InsCAAA G1961E 61/34 45 0.03 187.5 4.5 1 1 1 2 1 R1640Q G1961E 64/35 33 0.0665 158 0 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 65/35 38 0.008 172 0.05 3 3 3 3 4 C2150R 2626InsTTT 66/36 42 0.4 137 0.95 3 2 2 1 3 N96D IVS40&#fe;5g > a 67/37 14 0.235 132 0.15 3 2 3 3 4 IVS6-2a > t IVS6-2a > t 69/38 19 0.09 120 0 3 1 2 1 3 R511H N529S 70/39 42 0.515 140 0.4 3 3 3 3 4 IVS40&#fe;5g > a N965S 72/40 33 0.096 116.5 5.1 3 2 2 1 3 N96D L2140Q 73/41 17 0.1 160 14.35 2 2 2 3 4 G690D A1598D 74/42 36 0.0125 142.5 0 3 3 3 3 4 N96H N96H 75/43 45 0.2 214.5 11.7 2 1 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c G1961E 77/44 19 0.34 137.5 11.75 2 1 - 1 3 G1961E G618R 81/45 66 0.335 163 2 - 3 - 2 4 N96D G1961E 82/46 41 0.1 116.5 0.15 3 3 3 3 4 4538insC IVS40&#fe;5g > a 83/47 17 0.395 165 19.25 1 1 1 1 2 G1961E IVS45&#fe;1g > c 84/47 26 0.135 120 16.2 2 1 2 1 3 G1961E IVS45&#fe;1g > c 85/48 10 0.16 149.5 12.4 2 2 2 1 3 IVS35&#fe;2t > c IVS40&#fe;5g > a 87/40 25 0.9 155 15 2 1 2 1 2 N96D L2140Q 88/49 32 0.0715 144 0.1 - 3 - 3 4 IVS45&#fe;1g > c R2149X 89/50 14 0.1185 147 1.85 3 1 - 3 4 P402A 250insCAAA 90/51 35 0.07 116.5 0 - 3 - 3 4 A1598D R2030X 94/52 30 0.1 144 12.85 2 1 - 1 1 A1598D G1961E Fam, family; OCT ft, optical coherence tomography foveal thickness; MP, microperimetry; IS/OS, inner-outer segment junction; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; ERG, electroretinogram; mfERG, multifocal-electroretinogram. Statistics Our set of data is described by continuous (BCVA, OCT foveal thickness, and macular sensitivities) and categorical (fundus, FAF, IS/ OS, ERG, and mfERG groups) variables. Login to comment

[hide] Phenotypic and genetic spectrum of Danish patients... Ophthalmic Genet. 2012 Dec;33(4):225-31. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2011.643441. Epub 2012 Jan 9. Duno M, Schwartz M, Larsen PL, Rosenberg T
Phenotypic and genetic spectrum of Danish patients with ABCA4-related retinopathy.
Ophthalmic Genet. 2012 Dec;33(4):225-31. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2011.643441. Epub 2012 Jan 9., [PMID:22229821]

Abstract [show]
Background: Pathogenic variations in the ABCA4 gene were originally recognized as genetic background for the autosomal recessive disorders Stargardt disease and fundus flavimaculatus, but have expanded to embrace a diversity of retinal diseases, giving rise to the new diagnostic term, ABCA4-related retinopathy. Diagnostic genotyping of ABCA4 is complicated by the large size of the gene and the existence of approximately 600 known pathogenic variations, along with numerous rare polymorphisms. A commercial diagnostic array-based assay has been developed targeting known mutations, however a conclusive genetic diagnosis must rely on a comprehensive genetic screening as the mutation spectrum of ABCA4-related retinopathies continues to expand. Material and methods: Among 161 patients with a Stargardt-related phenotype previously assessed with the commercial ABCA4 mutation microarray, we analyzed the ABCA4 gene with High-resolution melting (HRM) in patients in whom the array analysis identified either a heterozygous mutation (n = 50) or no mutation (n = 30). Results: The HRM method detected each of the already known mutations and polymorphisms. We identified the second ABCA4 mutation in 31 of 50 heterozygous patients (62%). Several novel mutations were identified of which four were identified multiple times. The recurrent novel mutations were subsequently assessed among the 30 patients with possible ABCA4-related diseases, previously found to be negative for known ABCA4 mutations by array analysis. In total, 30 different mutations were identified of which 21 have not been described before. Conclusion: Scandinavian patients with ABCA4-related retinopathy appear to have a distinct mutation spectrum, which can be identified in patients of diverse clinical phenotypes.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
120 The remaining two patients were heterozygous for the known p.A1038V and p.R1098C mutations, respectively. Login to comment
123 The remaining two patients were heterozygous for the known p.A1038V and p.R1098C mutations, respectively. Login to comment

[hide] Novel mutations in of the ABCR gene in Italian pat... Eye (Lond). 2010 Jan;24(1):158-64. Epub 2009 Mar 6. Passerini I, Sodi A, Giambene B, Mariottini A, Menchini U, Torricelli F
Novel mutations in of the ABCR gene in Italian patients with Stargardt disease.
Eye (Lond). 2010 Jan;24(1):158-64. Epub 2009 Mar 6., [PMID:19265867]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: Stargardt disease (STGD) is the most prevalent juvenile macular dystrophy, and it has been associated with mutations in the ABCR gene, encoding a photoreceptor-specific transport protein. In this study, we determined the mutation spectrum in the ABCR gene in a group of Italian STGD patients. METHODS: The DNA samples of 71 Italian patients (from 62 independent pedigrees), affected with autosomal recessive STGD, were analysed for mutations in all 50 exons of the ABCR gene by the DHPLC approach (with optimization of the DHPLC conditions for mutation analysis) and direct sequencing techniques. RESULTS: In our group of STGD patients, 71 mutations were identified in 68 patients with a detection rate of 95.7%. Forty-three mutations had been already reported in the literature, whereas 28 mutations had not been previously described and were not detected in 150 unaffected control individuals of Italian origin. Missense mutations represented the most frequent finding (59.2%); G1961E was the most common mutation and it was associated with phenotypes in various degrees of severity. CONCLUSIONS: Some novel mutations in the ABCR gene were reported in a group of Italian STGD patients confirming the extensive allelic heterogeneity of this gene-probably related to the vast number of exons that favours rearrangements in the DNA sequence.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
57 Table 2 Summary of the mutations identified in the ABCR gene in our series of STGD Italian patients Patient Allele 1 mutation Allele 2 mutation S 1 R212C T1019M S 8 V1433I V1433I S 21 A1598D A1598D S 33 N96K G978D S 56 A1598D G1961E S 70 R212C T1019M S 71 W700X WT S 74 6750delA V767D S 77 G1961E WT S 82 Q21X G1961E S 106 C1177X G1961E S 107 C1177X G1961E S 114 T970P-F1015E - S 115 T970P-F1015E - S 120 N415K G1961E S 162 324-327insT 324-327insT S 181 W1408X G1961E S 190 C1177X A1598D S 201 G1961E WT S 202 Q21X T970P-F1015E S 213 M840R G1961E S 231 WT WT S 236 C1177X G1961E S 237 WT WT S 241 V256 splice WT S 246 IVS6-1g4t R1108C S 260 L2221P 5109delG-I156V S 321 IVS9 þ 1G4C S1099X S 328 IVS42 þ 4delG IVS35 þ 2t4c S 346 E2096K WT S 347 IVS28 þ 5g4a WT S 353 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 354 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 355 P1484S-G1961E P68L S 360 G1961E 5961delGGAC S 364 IVS35 þ 2t4c G1961E S 365 L541P/A1038V G1961E S 377 IVS42 þ 4delG IVS35 þ 2t4c S 380 R653C WT S 413 R212C T1019M S 414 A1598D G1961E S 417 G1078E G1961E S 438 R1055W WT S 440 4021ins24bp T1526M-G1961E S 449 W1479X L2140Q S 450 W1479X L2140Q S 474 W1461X G 1977S S 486 WT WT S 492 R1098C/L1970F 6548insTGAA S 528 T977P IVS40 þ 5g4a S 531 G690V Q1332X S 532 R572X L1473M-4733delGTTT S 535 IVS40 þ 5g4a 5917delG S 550 IVS40 þ 5g4a 6750delA S 555 250insCAAA WT S 556 250insCAAA WT S 575 N96H G1961E S 590 W821R IVS40 þ 5g4a S 592 V931M R1108C S 593 V767D R2030X Table 2 (Continued ) Patient Allele 1 mutation Allele 2 mutation S 594 G172S G1961E S 602 P1380L G1961E S 607 E616K L1580S-K2172R S 640 250insCAAA S1696N S 694 IVS35 þ 2t4c G1961E S 725 IVS13 þ 1g4a Q1376 splice S 731 L541P-A1038V G1961E S 755 N965S IVS40 þ 5g4a S 789 E1087K G1977S S 968 T1019M G1961E S 992 R212C G1961E Bold values indicate novel mutations. Login to comment

[hide] ABCA4 disease progression and a proposed strategy ... Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Mar 1;18(5):931-41. Epub 2008 Dec 12. Cideciyan AV, Swider M, Aleman TS, Tsybovsky Y, Schwartz SB, Windsor EA, Roman AJ, Sumaroka A, Steinberg JD, Jacobson SG, Stone EM, Palczewski K
ABCA4 disease progression and a proposed strategy for gene therapy.
Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Mar 1;18(5):931-41. Epub 2008 Dec 12., [PMID:19074458]

Abstract [show]
Autosomal recessive retinal diseases caused by mutations in the ABCA4 gene are being considered for gene replacement therapy. All individuals with ABCA4-disease show macular degeneration, but only some are thought to progress to retina-wide blindness. It is currently not predictable if or when specific ABCA4 genotypes will show extramacular disease, and how fast it will progress thereafter. Early clinical trials of focal subretinal gene therapy will aim to arrest disease progression in the extramacular retina. In 66 individuals with known disease-causing ABCA4 alleles, we defined retina-wide disease expression by measuring rod- and cone-photoreceptor-mediated vision. Serial measurements over a mean period of 8.7 years were consistent with a model wherein a normal plateau phase of variable length was followed by initiation of retina-wide disease that progressed exponentially. Once initiated, the mean rate of disease progression was 1.1 log/decade for rods and 0.45 log/decade for cones. Spatio-temporal progression of disease could be described as the sum of two components, one with a central-to-peripheral gradient and the other with a uniform retina-wide pattern. Estimates of the age of disease initiation were used as a severity metric and contributions made by each ABCA4 allele were predicted. One-third of the non-truncating alleles were found to cause more severe disease than premature truncations supporting the existence of a pathogenic component beyond simple loss of function. Genotype-based inclusion/exclusion criteria and prediction of the age of retina-wide disease initiation will be invaluable for selecting appropriate candidates for clinical trials in ABCA4 disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
50 P3 (W41X/R1098C) progressed from normal sensitivity (3.1 dB loss) at age 19 to a loss of 12.5 dB at age 27. Login to comment
119 Then, we calculated a severity value for six alleles (D654N, R1098C, Figure 4. Login to comment
151 Estimated severity of ABCA4 alleles and their properties ABCA4 allele Delay of retina-wide disease initiation (years)a In vitro or in vivo studiesb Molecular structural localizationc C2150Y 225.8 NBD-2 A1038V;L541P 214.0 35, 38 ECD-1/NBD-1 IVS38-10 T.C 211.1 L244P 25.7 ECD-1 E1122K 23.5 NBD-1 C54Y 22.1 35 ECD-1 IVS35þ2 T.C 22.1 R602W 21.8 38 ECD-1 V1896D 21.8 TM12 L1940P 21.4 NBD-2 Truncation mutationsd 0.0 E1087D 2.8 NBD-1 R220C 3.9 ECD-1 A1598D 3.9 ECD-2 R1640Q 3.9 ECD-2 R1098C 4.9 NBD-1 P1380L 7.4 35 TM7 N965S 7.6 35 NBD-1 V1433I 8.6 ECD-2 R1108C 10.4 35 NBD-1 T1526M 14.5 35 ECD-2 R2030Q 14.5 NBD-2 L2027F 15.1 35,37 NBD-2 G818E 17.3 35 TM5/TM6 S100P 18.2 ECD-1 L1201R 18.2 NBD-1 R18W 18.5 Nt D600E 18.5 ECD-1 L11P 21.7 Nt D654N 25.3 36 ECD-1 K2172R 27.9 NBD-2 IVS40þ5 G.A 28.1 G1961E 37.9 35 NBD-2 G1961R 44.0 NBD-2 a Delay of retina-wide disease initiation relative to the standard of age 10.6 years. Login to comment

[hide] Denaturing HPLC profiling of the ABCA4 gene for re... Clin Chem. 2004 Aug;50(8):1336-43. Epub 2004 Jun 10. Stenirri S, Fermo I, Battistella S, Galbiati S, Soriani N, Paroni R, Manitto MP, Martina E, Brancato R, Allikmets R, Ferrari M, Cremonesi L
Denaturing HPLC profiling of the ABCA4 gene for reliable detection of allelic variations.
Clin Chem. 2004 Aug;50(8):1336-43. Epub 2004 Jun 10., [PMID:15192030]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Mutations in the retina-specific ABC transporter (ABCA4) gene have been associated with several forms of macular degenerations. Because the high complexity of the molecular genotype makes scanning of the ABCA4 gene cumbersome, we describe here the first use of denaturing HPLC (DHPLC) to screen for ABCA4 mutations. METHODS: Temperature conditions were designed for all 50 exons based on effective separation of 83 samples carrying 86 sequence variations and 19 mutagenized controls. For validation, samples from 23 previously characterized Stargardt patients were subjected to DHPLC profiling. Subsequently, samples from a cohort of 30 patients affected by various forms of macular degeneration were subjected to DHPLC scanning under the same conditions. RESULTS: DHPLC profiling not only identified all 132 sequence alterations previously detected by double-gradient denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis but also identified 5 sequence alterations that this approach had missed. Moreover, DHPLC scanning of an additional panel of 30 previously untested patients led to the identification of 26 different mutations and 29 polymorphisms, accounting for 203 sequence variations on 29 of the 30 patients screened. In total, the DHPLC approach allowed us to identify 16 mutations that had never been reported before. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide strong support for the use of DHPLC for molecular characterization of the ABCA4 gene.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
35 Exon Genotypesa Exon Genotypesa 1b M1V (1A>G) (11) 24 3523-28TϾC (12) R18W (52C>T) (11) 25 G1203D (3608G>A)b 3 250_251insCAAA (7) 27 R1300X (3898C>T) (12) N96K (288C>A) R1300Q (3899G>A) (11) 302 ϩ 26 GϾA (13) 28 P1380L (4139CϾT) (14) 4 P143L (428C>T) (10) P1401P (4203CϾA) (15) 5 R152Q (455G>A) (4) 4253 ϩ 43GϾA (12) 6 571-1GϾT (4) 29 4253 ϩ 13GϾA (12) R212H (635G>A) (16) 4354-38GϾA (4) C230S (688T>A) (12) 30a 4466 ϩ 3GϾA (4) 641delG (9) 30b C1490Y (4469G>A) (17) 10 1240-14CϾT (13) P1512R (4535C>G) (4) H423R (1268ϾG) (13) 31 T1526M (4577C>T) (14) 1357 ϩ 11delG (16) 33/34 A1598D (4793C>A) (4) H423H (1269CϾT) (13) 35 4947delC (14) 11 1387delTT (4) 5018 ؉ 2T>C (7) R500R (1500GϾA) (4) 39 H1838Y (5512C>T) (14) 12 L541P (1622T>C) (14) 40 N1868I (5603AϾT) (13) R572Q (1715G>A) (17) L1894L (5682GϾC) (15) 13 Y639X (1917C>G) (17) 5714 ؉ 5G>A C641S (1922G>C) (4) 41 L1938L (5814AϾG) (12) 14 R653C (1957C>T) (12) 42 5836-43CϾA W700X (2099G>A) (4) 5836-11GϾA (15) 3607 ϩ 49TϾC P1948I (5843CϾT) (15) 15 V767D (2300T>A) (7) P1948P (5844AϾG) (15) 16 W821R (2461T>A) (14) G1961E (5882G>A) (14) 17 2588-33CϾTb 43 L1970F (5908C>T) (11) G863A (2588G>C) (17) 44 6006-16AϾG (16) 18 2654-36CϾT (4) I2023I (6069CϾT) (14) T897I (2690C>T) (7) L2027F (6079C>T) (14) 19 R943Q (2828GϾA) (13) 45 V2050L (6148G>C) (14) Y954D (2860T>G) (4) 46 R2107H (6320G>A) (18) N965S (2894A>G) (14) 6386 ؉ 2G>C (10) 20 G978D (2933G>A) (4) 47 R2139W (6415C>T) (14) L988L (2964CϾT) (4) R2149L (6446G>T) (4) 21 E1022K (3064G>A) (4) C2150Y (6449G>A) (19) A1038V (3113C>T) (14) 48 D2177N (6529G>A) (17) G1050D (3149G>A) (4) L2241V (6721C>G) (12) 3211_3212insGT (14) 6729 ϩ 21CϾT (15) 22 E1087K (3259G>A) (14) 49 6730-3TϾC (15) R1098C (3292C>T) (12) S2255I (6764GϾT) (13) S1099P (3295T>C) (4) 6816 ϩ 28GϾC (4) R1108C (3322C>T) (14) R1129L (3386G>T) (17) a Bold indicates disease-causing mutations. Login to comment
34 Exon Genotypesa Exon Genotypesa 1b M1V (1A>G) (11) 24 3523-28Tb0e;C (12) R18W (52C>T) (11) 25 G1203D (3608G>A)b 3 250_251insCAAA (7) 27 R1300X (3898C>T) (12) N96K (288C>A) R1300Q (3899G>A) (11) 302 af9; 26 Gb0e;A (13) 28 P1380L (4139Cb0e;T) (14) 4 P143L (428C>T) (10) P1401P (4203Cb0e;A) (15) 5 R152Q (455G>A) (4) 4253 af9; 43Gb0e;A (12) 6 571-1Gb0e;T (4) 29 4253 af9; 13Gb0e;A (12) R212H (635G>A) (16) 4354-38Gb0e;A (4) C230S (688T>A) (12) 30a 4466 af9; 3Gb0e;A (4) 641delG (9) 30b C1490Y (4469G>A) (17) 10 1240-14Cb0e;T (13) P1512R (4535C>G) (4) H423R (1268b0e;G) (13) 31 T1526M (4577C>T) (14) 1357 af9; 11delG (16) 33/34 A1598D (4793C>A) (4) H423H (1269Cb0e;T) (13) 35 4947delC (14) 11 1387delTT (4) 5018 d19; 2T>C (7) R500R (1500Gb0e;A) (4) 39 H1838Y (5512C>T) (14) 12 L541P (1622T>C) (14) 40 N1868I (5603Ab0e;T) (13) R572Q (1715G>A) (17) L1894L (5682Gb0e;C) (15) 13 Y639X (1917C>G) (17) 5714 d19; 5G>A C641S (1922G>C) (4) 41 L1938L (5814Ab0e;G) (12) 14 R653C (1957C>T) (12) 42 5836-43Cb0e;A W700X (2099G>A) (4) 5836-11Gb0e;A (15) 3607 af9; 49Tb0e;C P1948I (5843Cb0e;T) (15) 15 V767D (2300T>A) (7) P1948P (5844Ab0e;G) (15) 16 W821R (2461T>A) (14) G1961E (5882G>A) (14) 17 2588-33Cb0e;Tb 43 L1970F (5908C>T) (11) G863A (2588G>C) (17) 44 6006-16Ab0e;G (16) 18 2654-36Cb0e;T (4) I2023I (6069Cb0e;T) (14) T897I (2690C>T) (7) L2027F (6079C>T) (14) 19 R943Q (2828Gb0e;A) (13) 45 V2050L (6148G>C) (14) Y954D (2860T>G) (4) 46 R2107H (6320G>A) (18) N965S (2894A>G) (14) 6386 d19; 2G>C (10) 20 G978D (2933G>A) (4) 47 R2139W (6415C>T) (14) L988L (2964Cb0e;T) (4) R2149L (6446G>T) (4) 21 E1022K (3064G>A) (4) C2150Y (6449G>A) (19) A1038V (3113C>T) (14) 48 D2177N (6529G>A) (17) G1050D (3149G>A) (4) L2241V (6721C>G) (12) 3211_3212insGT (14) 6729 af9; 21Cb0e;T (15) 22 E1087K (3259G>A) (14) 49 6730-3Tb0e;C (15) R1098C (3292C>T) (12) S2255I (6764Gb0e;T) (13) S1099P (3295T>C) (4) 6816 af9; 28Gb0e;C (4) R1108C (3322C>T) (14) R1129L (3386G>T) (17) a Bold indicates disease-causing mutations. Login to comment

[hide] Mutational scanning of the ABCR gene with double-g... Hum Genet. 2001 Sep;109(3):326-38. Fumagalli A, Ferrari M, Soriani N, Gessi A, Foglieni B, Martina E, Manitto MP, Brancato R, Dean M, Allikmets R, Cremonesi L
Mutational scanning of the ABCR gene with double-gradient denaturing-gradient gel electrophoresis (DG-DGGE) in Italian Stargardt disease patients.
Hum Genet. 2001 Sep;109(3):326-38., [PMID:11702214]

Abstract [show]
Mutations in the retina-specific ABC transporter (ABCR) gene are responsible for autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (arSTGD). Mutation detection efficiency in ABCR in arSTGD patients ranges between 30% and 66% in previously published studies, because of high allelic heterogeneity and technical limitations of the employed methods. Conditions were developed to screen the ABCR gene by double-gradient denaturing-gradient gel electrophoresis. The efficacy of this method was evaluated by analysis of DNA samples with previously characterized ABCR mutations. This approach was applied to mutation detection in 44 Italian arSTGD patients corresponding to 36 independent genomes, in order to assess the nature and frequency of the ABCR mutations in this ethnic group. In 34 of 36 (94.4%) STGD patients, 37 sequence changes were identified, including 26 missense, six frameshift, three splicing, and two nonsense variations. Among these, 20 had not been previously described. Several polymorphisms were detected in affected individuals and in matched controls. Our findings extend the spectrum of mutations identified in STGD patients and suggest the existence of a subset of molecular defects specific to the Italian population. The identification of at least two disease-associated mutations in four healthy control individuals indicates a higher than expected carrier frequency of variant ABCR alleles in the general population. Genotype-phenotype analysis in our series showed a possible correlation between the nature and location of some mutations and specific ophthalmoscopic features of STGD disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
70 Mutated samples are: L541P (1622T→C) for exon 12; Y639X (1917C→A) for exon 13; R1098C (3292C→T) for exon 22; C1490Y (4469G→A) for exon 30; A1598D (4793C→A) for exon 34; R2149L (6446G→T) for exon 47 Table 2 Mutations detected in STGD patients and non-affected controls (Cases independent genomes analyzed). Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and molecular genetic study of 12 Italian... Genet Mol Res. 2012 Dec 17;11(4):4342-50. doi: 10.4238/2012.October.9.3. Oldani M, Marchi S, Giani A, Cecchin S, Rigoni E, Persi A, Podavini D, Guerrini A, Nervegna A, Staurenghi G, Bertelli M
Clinical and molecular genetic study of 12 Italian families with autosomal recessive Stargardt disease.
Genet Mol Res. 2012 Dec 17;11(4):4342-50. doi: 10.4238/2012.October.9.3., [PMID:23096905]

Abstract [show]
Stargardt disease was diagnosed in 12 patients from 12 families using complete ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. DNA was extracted for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct DNA sequencing (ABCA4 gene). Genetic counseling and eye examination were offered to 16 additional family members. Various patterns of presentation were observed in patients with clinical diagnoses of Stargardt disease. The genetic study identified 2 mutations in 75% of families (9/12); a second mutation could not be found in the remaining 25% of families (3/12). The most frequent mutation was G1961E, found in 17% of families (2/12). This finding is similar to that of a previous analysis report of an Italian patient series. Four new mutations were also identified: Tyr1858Asp, Leu1195fsX1196, p.Tyr850Cys, and p.Thr959Ala. Our results suggest that PCR and direct DNA sequencing are the most appropriate techniques for the analysis of the ABCA4 gene. However, this method requires supplementation with specific PCR analysis to diagnose large deletions. The study of the families identified healthy carriers and affected subjects in presymptomatic stages and was also useful for evaluating the risk of transmission to progeny. Combined ophthalmologic and genetic evaluation enabled better clinical management of these families.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
69 of patients Subject Allele 1 Allele 2 Age of diagnosis (years) Visual acuity Right eye Left eye 1 F1 ID81 Tyr1858Asp Met1Val; Arg2030Gln 22 20/50 20/32 2 F2 ID220 Ile156Val Gly607Arg; Gly1961Glu 30 20/800 20/400 3 F3 ID362 Met1Val Gly1961Glu; Arg2030Gln 60 20/40 20/32 4 F4 ID197 Asp1532Asn Arg2030term 40 20/32 20/32 5 F6 ID363 Tyr362Term Gly863Ala 16 20/200 20/250 6 F7 ID365 Arg1098Cys Cys1488Arg 50 20/32 20/800 7 F8 ID394 Arg18Trp Val767Asp 10 20/800 20/800 8 F9 ID396 IVS40+5G>A IVS13+1G>A 19 20/40 20/50 9 F10 ID366 p.Gln1513Profs*42 - 20 20/200 20/200 10 F12 ID377 Leu1195Argfs*2 - 50 20/32 20/20 11 F13 ID4 Cys2150Tyr - 70 20/400 20/400 12 F17 ID457 p.Tyr850Cys p.Thr959Ala 50 20/20 20/40 F1 = family 1; ID = reference code to a specific patient. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disea... Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003. Fujinami K, Sergouniotis PI, Davidson AE, Wright G, Chana RK, Tsunoda K, Tsubota K, Egan CA, Robson AG, Moore AT, Holder GE, Michaelides M, Webster AR
Clinical and molecular analysis of Stargardt disease with preserved foveal structure and function.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):487-501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.003., [PMID:23953153]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To describe a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease who show a foveal-sparing phenotype. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The foveal-sparing phenotype was defined as foveal preservation on autofluorescence imaging, despite a retinopathy otherwise consistent with Stargardt disease. Forty such individuals were ascertained and a full ophthalmic examination was undertaken. Following mutation screening of ABCA4, the molecular findings were compared with those of patients with Stargardt disease but no foveal sparing. RESULTS: The median age of onset and age at examination of 40 patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype were 43.5 and 46.5 years. The median logMAR visual acuity was 0.18. Twenty-two patients (22/40, 55%) had patchy parafoveal atrophy and flecks; 8 (20%) had numerous flecks at the posterior pole without atrophy; 7 (17.5%) had mottled retinal pigment epithelial changes; 2 (5%) had multiple atrophic lesions, extending beyond the arcades; and 1 (2.5%) had a bull's-eye appearance. The median central foveal thickness assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images was 183.0 mum (n = 33), with outer retinal tubulation observed in 15 (45%). Twenty-two of 33 subjects (67%) had electrophysiological evidence of macular dysfunction without generalized retinal dysfunction. Disease-causing variants were found in 31 patients (31/40, 78%). There was a higher prevalence of the variant p.Arg2030Gln in the cohort with foveal sparing compared to the group with foveal atrophy (6.45% vs 1.07%). CONCLUSIONS: The distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with the foveal-sparing phenotype are described. The presence of 2 distinct phenotypes of Stargardt disease (foveal sparing and foveal atrophy) suggests that there may be more than 1 disease mechanism in ABCA4 retinopathy.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
141 Allele Frequencies of 72 ABCA4 Variants Identified in a Comparison Groupa With the Typical Stargardt Disease (140 Patients Without Evidence of Foveal Sparing on Autofluorescence Imaging) Exon Nucleotide Substitution and Amino Acid Change Number of Alleles Allele Frequency 2 c.71G>A, p.Arg24His 1 0.36% 2 c.161G>A, p.Cys54Tyr 3 1.07% 3 c.223T>G, p.Cys75Gly 1 0.36% 5 c.455G>A, p.Arg152Gln 1 0.36% 5 c.454C>T, p.Arg152* 1 0.36% 5 c.466 A>G, p.Ile156Val 2 0.71% 6 c.634C>T, p. Arg212Cys 3 1.07% 6 c.656G>C, p.Arg219Thr 1 0.36% 6 c.666_678delAAAGACGGTGCGC, p.Lys223_Arg226delfs 2 0.71% 6 c.768G>T, Splicing site 4 1.42% 8 c.1037A>C, p.Lys346Thr 1 0.36% 10 c.1222C>T, p.Arg408* 3 1.07% 12 c.1622T>C, p.Leu541Pro 2 0.71% 12 c.1648 G>T, p.Gly550* 1 0.36% 13 c.1804C>T, p.Arg602Trp 1 0.36% 13 c.1817G>A, p.Gly606Asp 1 0.36% 13 c.1922G>C, p.Cys641Ser 1 0.36% Int 13 c.1937&#fe;1G>A, Splicing site 2 0.71% 14 c.1957C>T, p.Arg653Cys 2 0.71% 17 c.2588G>C, p.Gly863Ala 19 6.79% 18 c.2701A>G, p.Thr901Ala 1 0.36% 19 c.2791G>A, p.Val931Met 2 0.71% 19 c.2894A>G, p.Asn965Ser 1 0.36% 20 c.2966T>C, p.Vla989Ala 3 1.07% 20 c.2971G>C, p.Gly991Arg 2 0.71% 21 c.3056C>T, p.Thr1019Met 1 0.36% 21 c.3113C>T, p.Ala1038Val 3 1.07% 21 c.3064G>A, p.Glu1022Lys 2 0.71% 22 c.3211_3212insGT, p.Ser1071Cysfs 6 2.14% 22 c.3259G>A, p.Glu1087Lys 4 1.43% 22 c.3292C>T, p.Arg1098Cys 1 0.36% 22 c.3322C>T, p.Arg1108Cys 5 1.79% 22 c.3323G>A, p.Arg1108His 1 0.36% 23 c.3364G>A, p.Glu1122Lys 1 0.36% 23 c.3386G>A, p.Arg1129His 1 0.36% 24 c.3602T>G, p.Leu1201Arg 3 1.07% 27 c.3898C>T, p.Arg1300* 2 0.71% 28 c.4139C>T, p.Pro1380Leu 14 5.00% 28 c.4222T>C, p.Trp1408Arg 1 0.36% 28 c.4234C>T, p.Gly1412* 1 0.36% 28 c.4253&#fe;5G>T, Splice site 1 0.36% 28 c.4253&#fe;4C>T, Splice site 1 0.36% 29 c.4283C>T, p.Thr1428Met 1 0.36% 29 c.4319T>C, p.Phe1440Ser 1 0.36% 29 c.4462T>C, p.Cys1488Arg 1 0.36% 30 c.4469G>A, p.Cys1490Tyr 5 1.79% 30 c.4537_4538insC, p.Gly1513Profs 1 0.36% 31 c.4577C>T, p.Thr1526Met 2 0.71% 33 c.4715C>T, p.Thr1572Met 1 0.36% Continued on next page TABLE 3. Login to comment

[hide] ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570. Fujinami K, Zernant J, Chana RK, Wright GA, Tsunoda K, Ozawa Y, Tsubota K, Webster AR, Moore AT, Allikmets R, Michaelides M
ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing in a British cohort.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570., [PMID:23982839]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We applied a recently reported next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy for screening the ABCA4 gene in a British cohort with ABCA4-associated disease and report novel mutations. METHODS: We identified 79 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ABCA4-associated disease who had a single variant identified by the ABCA4 microarray. Comprehensive phenotypic data were obtained, and the NGS strategy was applied to identify the second allele by means of sequencing the entire coding region and adjacent intronic sequences of the ABCA4 gene. Identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and assessed for pathogenicity by in silico analysis. RESULTS: Of the 42 variants detected by prescreening with the microarray, in silico analysis suggested that 34, found in 66 subjects, were disease-causing and 8, found in 13 subjects, were benign variants. We detected 42 variants by NGS, of which 39 were classified as disease-causing. Of these 39 variants, 31 were novel, including 16 missense, 7 splice-site-altering, 4 nonsense, 1 in-frame deletion, and 3 frameshift variants. Two or more disease-causing variants were confirmed in 37 (47%) of 79 patients, one disease-causing variant in 36 (46%) subjects, and no disease-causing variant in 6 (7%) individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the NGS platform for ABCA4 screening enabled detection of the second disease-associated allele in approximately half of the patients in a British cohort where one mutation had been detected with the arrayed primer extension (APEX) array. The time- and cost-efficient NGS strategy is useful in screening large cohorts, which will be increasingly valuable with the advent of ABCA4-directed therapies.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
55 1 c.161G>A p.C54Y DC c.2297G>T p.G766V DC 2 2 c.223T>G p.C75G DC c.5088C>G p.S1696R DC 2 3 c.740A>C p.N247T DC c.1433T>C p.I478T B c.2345G>A p.W782* DC 2 4 c.768G>T Splice site DC 1 5 c.1222C>T p.R408* DC c.2568C>A p.Y856* DC 2 6 c.1804C>T p.R602W DC c.859-9T>C Splice site PDC 2 7 c.1805G>A p.R602Q DC c.5113C>T p.R1705W DC 2 8 c.1922G>C p.C641S DC 1 9 c.1957C>T p.R653C DC 1 10 c.1957C>T p.R653C DC 1 11 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.655A>T p.R219* DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R219*) was APEX-false-negative 12 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 13 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 14 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC 1 15 c.2588G>C p.G863A DC 1 16 c.2894A>G p.N965S DC c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R1108C) was APEX-false-negative 17 c.3064G>A p.E1022K DC c.6729&#fe;4_&#fe;18delAGTTGGCCCTGGGGC Splice site DC 2 18 c.3064G>A p.E1022K DC 1 19 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.2942C>T p.P981L DC c.6529G>A p.D2177N B 2 20 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.1519G>T p.D507Y DC 2 21 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.4634G>A p.S1545N DC 2 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC 1 23 c.3292C>T p.R1098C DC c.3299T>A p.I1100N DC 2 24 c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC c.4978delC p.L1661* DC 2 25 c.3386G>A p.R1129H DC c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.4634G>A p.S1545N DC 3 Allele 2 (p.S1071fs) was APEX false-negative and allele 1 (p.R1129H) was NGS false-negative 26 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.3191-1G>T Splice site DC 2 27 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.3398T>C p.I1133T PDC 2 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.4070C>A p.A1357E DC 2 29 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC c.4773G>C Splice site DC 2 30 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 31 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 32 c.4139C>T p.P1380L DC 1 33 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* DC 1 34 c.4319T>C p.F1440S DC 1 35 c.4328G>A p.R1443H DC c.180delG p.M61fs DC 2 36 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y DC c.1726G>C p.D576H DC 2 37 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y DC 1 38 c.4537_4538insC p.Q1513fs DC c.5578C>T p.R1860W DC 2 Allele 1 (p.Q1513fs) was NGS-false-negative 39 c.4577C>T p.T1526M DC 1 T ABLE 2. Continued Pt Allele 1 Detected by APEX Allele 2 Detected by NGS Allele 3 Detected by NGS Total N of DC Variants Comments DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. DNA Change Protein Change/ Effect Pred. Patho. Login to comment
62 Hum Var Score (0-1) Site Wt CV Mt CV CV % Variation 3 c.161G>A p.C54Y 1 1 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.11 PRD 0.994 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs150774447) 3 c.223T>G p.C75G 1 2 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. NA POD 0.603 No change ND 5 c.466A>G p.I156V 2 77, 78 [ [ Papaioannou M, et al. 16 Tol. 0.46 B 0.003 No change 16/13006 db SNP (rs112467008) Benign 6 c.655A>T p.R219* 1 11 [ Xi Q, et al. 27 ND 6 c.740A>C p.N247T 1 3 [ [ APEX Del. NA B 0.135 No change ND 6 c.768G>T Splice site 1 4 [ [ Klevering BJ, et al. 22 Tol. 0.56 NA Don. 70.4 58 Site broken (17.51) ND 9 c.1222C>T p.R408* 1 5 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 ND 12 c.1726G>C p.D576H 1 36 [ Downs K, et al. 25 POD 0.688 Acc. 68.1 39.1 Site broken (42.54) 1/13006 13 c.1804C>T p.R602W 1 6 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 B 0.129 No change ND db SNP (rs 6179409) 13 c.1805G>A p.R602Q 1 7 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.04 PRD 0.513 Acc. 48.9 77.9 New site (&#fe;59.14) 2/13006 db SNP (rs61749410) 13 c.1906C>T p.Q636* 3 12, 13, 60 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs145961131) 13 c.1922G>C p.C641S 1 8 [ [ Stenirri S, et al. 24 Del. 0.00 No change ND db SNP (rs61749416) 14 c.1957C>T p.R653C 2 9, 10 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.999 No change ND db SNP (rs61749420) 17 c.2588G>C p.G863A/ p.DelG863 5 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 / Maugeri A, et al. 29 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.996 No change 68/13006 db SNP (rs76157638) 18 c.2701A>G p.T901A 1 74 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.82 B 0.008 23/13006 db SNP (rs139655975) Benign 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S 1 16 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.03 PRD 0.981 Acc. 53.4 82.3 New site (&#fe;54.26) ND db SNP (rs201471607) 20 c.2971G>C p.G991R 1 67 [ [ Yatsenko AN, et al. 13 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 28/13006 db SNP (rs147484266) Benign 22 c.3064G>A p.E1022K 2 17, 18 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.00 PRD 1.000 No change ND db SNP (rs61749459) 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs 5 19, 20, 21, 22, 25 [ [ APEX ND False-negative in APEX in patient 25 22 c.3292C>T p.R1098C 1 23 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. NA PRD 0.999 No change ND 22 c.3322C>T p.R1108C 3 16, 24, 61 [ [ Rozet JM, et al. 10 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.986 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs61750120) False-negative in APEX in patients 16 and 61 23 c.3386G>A p.R1129H 1 25 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 PRD 0.989 No change ND False-negative in NGS in patient 25 24 c.3602T>G p.L1201R 4 72, 73, 74, 79 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.37 B 0.052 Don. 61.3 73.7 New site (20.08) 416/13006 db SNP (rs61750126) Benign 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L 7 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.01 B 0.377 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs61750130) 28 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* 1 33 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 ND db SNP (rs61750137) 29 c.4283C>T p.T1428M 1 76 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.15 B 0.010 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs1800549) Benign 29 c.4319T>C p.F1440S 1 34 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 POD 0.744 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750141) 29 c.4326C>A p.N1442K 1 64 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Tol. NA POD 0.374 No change ND 29 c.4328G>A p.R1443H 1 35 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 1/13006 dbSNP (rs61750142) IVS29 c.4352&#fe;1G>A Splice site 1 73 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Don. 82.3 55.4 WT site broken (32.62) ND 30 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y 2 36, 37 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.994 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751402) 30 c.4538A>G p.Q1513R 1 67 [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Tol. NA Benign 0.043 Acc. 91.7 62.8 Site broken (31.55) ND T ABLE 3. Continued Exon/ IVS Nucleotide Substitution Protein Change/ Effect N of Alleles Identified Pt Method Previous Report SIFT Polyphen 2 HSF Matrix Allele Freq. by EVS Reference Comment APEX NGS Pred. Tol. Index (0-1) Pred. Login to comment