ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Leu467Pro

Admin's notes:	Class II (maturation defect) Veit et al.
ClinVar:	c.1399C>T , p.Leu467Phe ? , not provided c.1400T>C , p.Leu467Pro D , Pathogenic
CF databases:	c.1400T>C , p.Leu467Pro D , CF-causing ; CFTR1:
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (95%), C: D (91%), D: D (95%), E: D (95%), F: D (63%), G: D (95%), H: D (95%), I: D (85%), K: D (95%), M: D (91%), N: D (95%), P: D (95%), Q: D (95%), R: D (95%), S: D (95%), T: D (95%), V: D (91%), W: D (95%), Y: D (95%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: N, K: D, M: N, N: D, P: D, Q: D, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: N, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

II (maturation defect) <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823392">Veit et al.</a>
admin on 2016-08-19 15:16:22

Publications
[hide] Report of two patients with associated conditions ... J Cyst Fibros. 2010 Jul;9(4):269-71. Epub 2010 May 26. Jambhekar SK, Carroll JL, Keiles S
Report of two patients with associated conditions in addition to cystic fibrosis.
J Cyst Fibros. 2010 Jul;9(4):269-71. Epub 2010 May 26., [PMID:20510657]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To report two patients with associated conditions in addition to cystic fibrosis. METHODS: We reviewed our database and report two patients with cystic fibrosis who had associated conditions. These patients also had novel disease causing CFTR mutations on full gene sequence analysis. RESULTS: We identified 2 patients with novel disease causing cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mutations that we report here. A 12-year-old female with cystic fibrosis, diagnosed at 18months, had normal pulmonary function tests and chest X-ray. Her main cystic fibrosis-related health issue was poor growth. Results of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator DNA analysis showed deltaF508; L467P; and 7T/9T. She was later diagnosed with Crohn's disease. An 11-year-old male with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, diagnosed with cystic fibrosis at 2years of age, had minimal findings on chest X-ray and pancreatic insufficiency. Results of his cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator DNA analysis showed deltaF508; 4329delCT; and 7T/9T. CONCLUSION: We report 2 patients with CF who had associated conditions and also had novel disease causing CFTR mutations. Associated conditions may worsen the clinical manifestations of CF and complicate medical management.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
6 Results of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator DNA analysis showed deltaF508; L467P; and 7T/9T. Login to comment
64 Genetic diagnosis: The results of CFTR DNA showed deltaF508; L467P; 7T/9T. Login to comment
65 Her mother's CFTR DNA showed L467P; Q250R, confirming that the patient's two mutations are on different chromosomes, confirming the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Login to comment
97 The novel mutations L467P variant and the 4329delCT variant have not been reported in the literature but appear to be disease causing in our patients based on sweat testing and the presence of pancreatic insufficiency. Login to comment

[hide] Implementation of the first worldwide quality assu... Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Jul 15;412(15-16):1376-81. Epub 2011 Apr 14. Earley MC, Laxova A, Farrell PM, Driscoll-Dunn R, Cordovado S, Mogayzel PJ Jr, Konstan MW, Hannon WH
Implementation of the first worldwide quality assurance program for cystic fibrosis multiple mutation detection in population-based screening.
Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Jul 15;412(15-16):1376-81. Epub 2011 Apr 14., 2011-07-15 [PMID:21514289]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: CDC's Newborn Screening Quality Assurance Program collaborated with several U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Care Centers to collect specimens for development of a molecular CFTR proficiency testing program using dried-blood spots for newborn screening laboratories. METHODS: Adult and adolescent patients or carriers donated whole blood that was aliquoted onto filter paper cards. Five blind-coded specimens were sent to participating newborn screening laboratories quarterly. Proficiency testing results were evaluated based on presumptive clinical assessment. Individual evaluations and summary reports were sent to each participating laboratory and technical consultations were offered if incorrect assessments were reported. RESULTS: The current CDC repository contains specimens with 39 different CFTR mutations. Up to 45 laboratories have participated in the program. Three years of data showed that correct assessments were reported 97.7% of the time overall when both mutations could be determined. Incorrect assessments that could have lead to a missed case occurred 0.9% of the time, and no information was reported 1.1% of the time due to sample failure. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that laboratories using molecular assays to detect CFTR mutations are performing satisfactorily. The programmatic results presented demonstrate the importance and complexity of providing proficiency testing for DNA-based assays.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
130 )del Exon 17a-17b del p.Leu467Pro L467P p.Gln39X Q39X c.(?_54)_(164_? Login to comment

[hide] Molecular basis of cystic fibrosis in the Republic... Clin Genet. 1998 Sep;54(3):203-9. Petreska L, Koceva S, Plaseska D, Chernick M, Gordova-Muratovska A, Fustic S, Nestorov R, Efremov GD
Molecular basis of cystic fibrosis in the Republic of Macedonia.
Clin Genet. 1998 Sep;54(3):203-9., [PMID:9788722]

Abstract [show]
Eighty-three cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and their families, belonging to various ethnic groups living in the Republic of Macedonia were studied for molecular defects in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, and for the associated extragenic marker loci XV-2c and KM19. The DNA methodology used included characterization of CFTR mutations in 19 exons (and flanking sequences) of the gene and analysis of distribution of the XV-2c/KM19 haplotypes among normal (N) and CF chromosomes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification followed by dot blot hybridization, restriction digestion, single-strand conformational polymorphism, constant denaturing gel electrophoresis, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and sequencing. We identified 58.4% (97/166) of the CF chromosomes. Nine different CFTR gene mutations, including three novel ones, were found. Eight known and one new CFTR intragene polymorphisms were also characterized. The haplotype analysis of the XV-2c/TaqI and KM19/PstI polymorphic loci have shown that haplotype C is the most frequently found haplotype among the non-deltaF508 CF chromosomes from Macedonia (36.5%). The results demonstrate the broad heterogeneity of CF origin in this part of the Balkan Peninsula.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
75 In a total of 23 CF and five undetermined chromosomes we characterized nine CFTR gene polymorphisms: a) by SSCP: R75Q (30), 405 +46GJT (34), 875+40A/G (35), L467P and 4002A/G (4), M470V (22), and the new one P324P (18); b) by CDGE: T966T (36) and 3041-92G/A (37). Login to comment
78 The L467P polymorphism was found on three AF508 chromosomes. Login to comment

[hide] CFTR mutation analysis and haplotype associations ... Mol Genet Metab. 2012 Feb;105(2):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Oct 26. Cordovado SK, Hendrix M, Greene CN, Mochal S, Earley MC, Farrell PM, Kharrazi M, Hannon WH, Mueller PW
CFTR mutation analysis and haplotype associations in CF patients.
Mol Genet Metab. 2012 Feb;105(2):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Oct 26., [PMID:22137130]

Abstract [show]
Most newborn screening (NBS) laboratories use second-tier molecular tests for cystic fibrosis (CF) using dried blood spots (DBS). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's NBS Quality Assurance Program offers proficiency testing (PT) in DBS for CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutation detection. Extensive molecular characterization on 76 CF patients, family members or screen positive newborns was performed for quality assurance. The coding, regulatory regions and portions of all introns were sequenced and large insertions/deletions were characterized as well as two intronic di-nucleotide microsatellites. For CF patient samples, at least two mutations were identified/verified and four specimens contained three likely CF-associated mutations. Thirty-four sequence variations in 152 chromosomes were identified, five of which were not previously reported. Twenty-seven of these variants were used to predict haplotypes from the major haplotype block defined by HapMap data that spans the promoter through intron 19. Chromosomes containing the F508del (p.Phe508del), G542X (p.Gly542X) and N1303K (p.Asn1303Lys) mutations shared a common haplotype subgroup, consistent with a common ancient European founder. Understanding the haplotype background of CF-associated mutations in the U.S. population provides a framework for future phenotype/genotype studies and will assist in determining a likely cis/trans phase of the mutations without need for parent studies.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
89 In four samples, 2184delA/ 394delTT, 3905insT/1248+1G→A, 3120+ 1G→A/-102T→A and 3120+1G→A/L467P, the predicted haplotype could not be unambiguously assigned to one of the two CF-causing mutations. Login to comment

[hide] Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mu... J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Van Goor F, Yu H, Burton B, Hoffman BJ
Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mutations associated with defects in protein processing or function.
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 23., [PMID:23891399]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor (KALYDECO, VX-770) is a CFTR potentiator that increased CFTR channel activity and improved lung function in patients age 6 years and older with CF who have the G551D-CFTR gating mutation. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of ivacaftor on mutant CFTR protein forms with defects in protein processing and/or channel function. METHODS: The effect of ivacaftor on CFTR function was tested in electrophysiological studies using a panel of Fischer rat thyroid (FRT) cells expressing 54 missense CFTR mutations that cause defects in the amount or function of CFTR at the cell surface. RESULTS: Ivacaftor potentiated multiple mutant CFTR protein forms that produce functional CFTR at the cell surface. These included mutant CFTR forms with mild defects in CFTR processing or mild defects in CFTR channel conductance. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro data indicated that ivacaftor is a broad acting CFTR potentiator and could be used to help stratify patients with CF who have different CFTR genotypes for studies investigating the potential clinical benefit of ivacaftor.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
44 None M1V A46D E56K P67L R74W G85E E92K D110E D110H R117C R117H E193K L206W R334W I336K T338I S341P R347H R347P R352Q A455E L467P S492F F508del V520F A559T R560S R560T A561E Y569D D579G R668C L927P S945L S977F L997F F1052V H1054D K1060T L1065P R1066C R1066H R1066M A1067T R1070Q R1070W F1074L L1077P H1085R M1101K D1152H S1235R D1270N N1303K 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 * * * CFTR Mutation mRNA (% Normal CFTR) Fig. 1. Login to comment
64 Mutant CFTR form CFTR processing Mature/total % Normal CFTR Normal 0.89 &#b1; 0.01 100.0 &#b1; 18.5 G85E -0.05 &#b1; 0.04 -1.0 &#b1; 0.9 R560S 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 R1066C 0.02 &#b1; 0.01 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 S492F 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 R560T 0.01 &#b1; 0.01 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 V520F 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 M1101K 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 A561E 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 R1066M 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.4 N1303K 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.3 A559T 0.16 &#b1; 0.09 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 M1V 0.06 &#b1; 0.06 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 Y569D 0.11 &#b1; 0.04 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 R1066H 0.08 &#b1; 0.02a 0.7 &#b1; 0.2a L1065P 0.05 &#b1; 0.05 1.0 &#b1; 0.8 L467P 0.10 &#b1; 0.07 1.2 &#b1; 0.8 L1077P 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 1.5 &#b1; 0.6 A46D 0.21 &#b1; 0.08 1.9 &#b1; 0.5a E92K 0.06 &#b1; 0.05 1.9 &#b1; 1.3 H1054D 0.09 &#b1; 0.04 1.9 &#b1; 0.8 F508del 0.09 &#b1; 0.02a 2.3 &#b1; 0.5a H1085R 0.06 &#b1; 0.01a 3.0 &#b1; 0.7a I336K 0.42 &#b1; 0.05a 6.5 &#b1; 0.7a L206W 0.35 &#b1; 0.10a 6.8 &#b1; 1.7a F1074L 0.52 &#b1; 0.03a 10.9 &#b1; 0.6a A455E 0.26 &#b1; 0.10a 11.5 &#b1; 2.5a E56K 0.29 &#b1; 0.04a 12.2 &#b1; 1.5a R347P 0.48 &#b1; 0.04a 14.6 &#b1; 1.8a R1070W 0.61 &#b1; 0.04a 16.3 &#b1; 0.6a P67L 0.36 &#b1; 0.04a 28.4 &#b1; 6.8a R1070Q 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a 29.5 &#b1; 1.4a S977F 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a 37.3 &#b1; 2.4a A1067T 0.78 &#b1; 0.03a 38.6 &#b1; 6.1a D579G 0.72 &#b1; 0.02a 39.3 &#b1; 3.1a D1270N 1.00 &#b1; 0.00a,c 40.7 &#b1; 1.2a S945L 0.65 &#b1; 0.04a 42.4 &#b1; 8.9a L927P 0.89 &#b1; 0.01a,b 43.5 &#b1; 2.5a,b R117C 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 49.1 &#b1; 2.9a,b T338I 0.93 &#b1; 0.03a,b 54.2 &#b1; 3.7a,b L997F 0.90 &#b1; 0.04a,b 59.8 &#b1; 10.4a,b D110H 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a,b 60.6 &#b1; 1.5a,b S341P 0.79 &#b1; 0.02a 65.0 &#b1; 4.9a,b R668C 0.94 &#b1; 0.03a,b 68.5 &#b1; 1.9a,b R74W 0.78 &#b1; 0.01a 69.0 &#b1; 2.7a,b D110E 0.92 &#b1; 0.05a,b 87.5 &#b1; 9.5a,b R334W 0.91 &#b1; 0.05a,b 97.6 &#b1; 10.0a,b K1060T 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 109.9 &#b1; 28.0a,b R347H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 120.7 &#b1; 2.8a,b S1235R 0.96 &#b1; 0.00a,c 139.0 &#b1; 9.0a,b E193K 0.84 &#b1; 0.02a,b 143.0 &#b1; 17.1a,b R117H 0.86 &#b1; 0.01a,b 164.5 &#b1; 34.2a,b R352Q 0.98 &#b1; 0.01a,b 179.9 &#b1; 8.0a,c F1052V 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a,b 189.9 &#b1; 33.1a,b D1152H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 312.0 &#b1; 45.5a,b Notes to Table 1: Quantification of steady-state CFTR maturation expressed as the mean (&#b1;SEM; n = 5-9) ratio of mature CFTR to total CFTR (immature plus mature) or level of mature mutant CFTR relative to mature normal-CFTR (% normal CFTR) in FRT cells individually expressing CFTR mutations. Login to comment
74 Because the level of CFTR mRNA was similar across the panel of cell lines tested, the range in baseline activity and ivacaftor response likely reflects the severity of the functional defect and/or the 0 50 100 150 200 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L E56K P67L R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V Baseline With ivacaftor * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chloride transport (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form 0 100 200 300 400 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L P67L E56K R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mature CFTR (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form A B Fig. 2. Login to comment
82 Mutation Patientsa Chloride transport (bc;A/cm2 ) Chloride transport (% normal) EC50 Baseline With ivacaftor Baseline With ivacaftor Fold increase over baselineb Normal 204.5 &#b1; 33.3 301.3 &#b1; 33.8c 100.0 &#b1; 16.3 147.3 &#b1; 16.5c 1.5 266 &#b1; 42 G551D 1282 1.5 &#b1; 0.7 113.2 &#b1; 13.0c 1.0 &#b1; 0.5 55.3 &#b1; 6.3c 55.3 312 &#b1; 73 F1052V 12 177.3 &#b1; 13.7 410.2 &#b1; 11.3c 86.7 &#b1; 6.7 200.7 &#b1; 5.6c 2.3 177 &#b1; 14 S1235R ND 160.6 &#b1; 25.7 352.1 &#b1; 43.4c 78.5 &#b1; 12.6 172.2 &#b1; 21.2c 2.2 282 &#b1; 104 D1152H 185 117.3 &#b1; 23.0 282.7 &#b1; 46.9c 57.4 &#b1; 11.2 138.2 &#b1; 22.9c 2.4 178 &#b1; 67 D1270N 32 109.5 &#b1; 20.5 209.5 &#b1; 27.4c 53.6 &#b1; 10.0 102.4 &#b1; 13.4c 1.9 254 &#b1; 56 R668C 45 99.0 &#b1; 9.4 217.6 &#b1; 11.7c 48.4 &#b1; 4.6 106.4 &#b1; 5.7c 2.2 517 &#b1; 105 K1060T ND 89.0 &#b1; 9.8 236.4 &#b1; 20.3c 43.5 &#b1; 4.8 115.6 &#b1; 9.9c 2.7 131 &#b1; 73 R74W 25 86.8 &#b1; 26.9 199.1 &#b1; 16.8c 42.5 &#b1; 13.2 97.3 &#b1; 8.2c 2.3 162 &#b1; 17 R117H 739 67.2 &#b1; 13.3 274.1 &#b1; 32.2c 32.9 &#b1; 6.5 134.0 &#b1; 15.7c 4.1 151 &#b1; 14 E193K ND 62.2 &#b1; 9.8 379.1 &#b1; 1.1c 30.4 &#b1; 4.8 185.4 &#b1; 1.0c 6.1 240 &#b1; 20 A1067T ND 55.9 &#b1; 3.2 164.0 &#b1; 9.7c 27.3 &#b1; 1.6 80.2 &#b1; 4.7c 2.9 317 &#b1; 214 L997F 27 43.7 &#b1; 3.2 145.5 &#b1; 4.0c 21.4 &#b1; 1.6 71.2 &#b1; 2.0c 3.3 162 &#b1; 12 R1070Q 15 42.0 &#b1; 0.8 67.3 &#b1; 2.9c 20.6 &#b1; 0.4 32.9 &#b1; 1.4c 1.6 164 &#b1; 20 D110E ND 23.3 &#b1; 4.7 96.4 &#b1; 15.6c 11.4 &#b1; 2.3 47.1 &#b1; 7.6c 4.1 213 &#b1; 51 D579G 21 21.5 &#b1; 4.1 192.0 &#b1; 18.5c 10.5 &#b1; 2.0 93.9 &#b1; 9.0c 8.9 239 &#b1; 48 D110H 30 18.5 &#b1; 2.2 116.7 &#b1; 11.3c 9.1 &#b1; 1.1 57.1 &#b1; 5.5c 6.2 249 &#b1; 59 R1070W 13 16.6 &#b1; 2.6 102.1 &#b1; 3.1c 8.1 &#b1; 1.3 49.9 &#b1; 1.5c 6.2 158 &#b1; 48 P67L 53 16.0 &#b1; 6.7 88.7 &#b1; 15.7c 7.8 &#b1; 3.3 43.4 &#b1; 7.7c 5.6 195 &#b1; 40 E56K ND 15.8 &#b1; 3.1 63.6 &#b1; 4.4c 7.7 &#b1; 1.5 31.1 &#b1; 2.2c 4.0 123 &#b1; 33 F1074L ND 14.0 &#b1; 3.4 43.5 &#b1; 5.4c 6.9 &#b1; 1.6 21.3 &#b1; 2.6c 3.1 141 &#b1; 19 A455E 120 12.9 &#b1; 2.6 36.4 &#b1; 2.5c 6.3 &#b1; 1.2 17.8 &#b1; 1.2c 2.8 170 &#b1; 44 S945L 63 12.3 &#b1; 3.9 154.9 &#b1; 47.6c 6.0 &#b1; 1.9 75.8 &#b1; 23.3c 12.6 181 &#b1; 36 S977F 9 11.3 &#b1; 6.2 42.5 &#b1; 19.1c 5.5 &#b1; 3.0 20.8 &#b1; 9.3c 3.8 283 &#b1; 36 R347H 65 10.9 &#b1; 3.3 106.3 &#b1; 7.6c 5.3 &#b1; 1.6 52.0 &#b1; 3.7c 9.8 280 &#b1; 35 L206W 81 10.3 &#b1; 1.7 36.4 &#b1; 2.8c 5.0 &#b1; 0.8 17.8 &#b1; 1.4c 3.6 101 &#b1; 13 R117C 61 5.8 &#b1; 1.5 33.7 &#b1; 7.8c 2.9 &#b1; 0.7 16.5 &#b1; 3.8c 5.7 380 &#b1; 136 R352Q 46 5.5 &#b1; 1.0 84.5 &#b1; 7.8c 2.7 &#b1; 0.5 41.3 &#b1; 3.8c 15.2 287 &#b1; 75 R1066H 29 3.0 &#b1; 0.3 8.0 &#b1; 0.8c 1.5 &#b1; 0.1 3.9 &#b1; 0.4c 2.6 390 &#b1; 179 T338I 54 2.9 &#b1; 0.8 16.1 &#b1; 2.4c 1.4 &#b1; 0.4 7.9 &#b1; 1.2c 5.6 334 &#b1; 38 R334W 150 2.6 &#b1; 0.5 10.0 &#b1; 1.4c 1.3 &#b1; 0.2 4.9 &#b1; 0.7c 3.8 259 &#b1; 103 G85E 262 1.6 &#b1; 1.0 1.5 &#b1; 1.2 0.8 &#b1; 0.5 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS A46D ND 2.0 &#b1; 0.6 1.1 &#b1; 1.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS I336K 29 1.8 &#b1; 0.2 7.4 &#b1; 0.1c 0.9 &#b1; 0.1 3.6 &#b1; 0.1c 4 735 &#b1; 204 H1054D ND 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 8.7 &#b1; 0.3c 0.8 &#b1; 0.1 4.2 &#b1; 0.1c 5.3 187 &#b1; 20 F508del 29,018 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 12.1 &#b1; 1.7c 0.4 &#b1; 0.3 5.9 &#b1; 0.8c 14.8 129 &#b1; 38 M1V 9 0.7 &#b1; 1.4 6.5 &#b1; 1.9c 0.4 &#b1; 0.7 3.2 &#b1; 0.9c 8.0 183 &#b1; 85 E92K 14 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 4.3 &#b1; 0.8c 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 2.1 &#b1; 0.4c 7.0 198 &#b1; 46 V520F 58 0.4 &#b1; 0.2 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS H1085R ND 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 2.1 &#b1; 0.4 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS R560T 180 0.3 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.5 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS L927P 15 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 10.7 &#b1; 1.7c 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 5.2 &#b1; 0.8c 52.0 313 &#b1; 66 R560S ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 -0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 -0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS N1303K 1161 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS M1101K 79 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1077P 42 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066M ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066C 100 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1065P 25 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS Y569D 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS A561E ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS A559T 43 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S492F 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 1.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS L467P 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R347P 214 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S341P 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS a Number of individuals with the individual mutation in the CFTR-2 database (www.CFTR2.org). Login to comment

[hide] Full-open and closed CFTR channels, with lateral t... Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015 Apr;72(7):1377-403. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1749-2. Epub 2014 Oct 7. Mornon JP, Hoffmann B, Jonic S, Lehn P, Callebaut I
Full-open and closed CFTR channels, with lateral tunnels from the cytoplasm and an alternative position of the F508 region, as revealed by molecular dynamics.
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015 Apr;72(7):1377-403. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1749-2. Epub 2014 Oct 7., [PMID:25287046]

Abstract [show]
In absence of experimental 3D structures, several homology models, based on ABC exporter 3D structures, have provided significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride channel whose defects are associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). Until now, these models, however, did not furnished much insights into the continuous way that ions could follow from the cytosol to the extracellular milieu in the open form of the channel. Here, we have built a refined model of CFTR, based on the outward-facing Sav1866 experimental 3D structure and integrating the evolutionary and structural information available today. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed significant conformational changes, resulting in a full-open channel, accessible from the cytosol through lateral tunnels displayed in the long intracellular loops (ICLs). At the same time, the region of nucleotide-binding domain 1 in contact with one of the ICLs and carrying amino acid F508, the deletion of which is the most common CF-causing mutation, was found to adopt an alternative but stable position. Then, in a second step, this first stable full-open conformation evolved toward another stable state, in which only a limited displacement of the upper part of the transmembrane helices leads to a closure of the channel, in a conformation very close to that adopted by the Atm1 ABC exporter, in an inward-facing conformation. These models, supported by experimental data, provide significant new insights into the CFTR structure-function relationships and into the possible impact of CF-causing mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
360 The effects of remaining mutations listed in CFTR2 database can also be well understood in light of our structural data: (1) A455E has indeed no room to be well adapted, (2) G1244E (mentioned above) also occurs in a well conserved position (position 23 in Online Resource 2), (3) L467P might disturb the helix in which it is included, (4) G1349D is in the non-canonical ATP-binding site and, alike its corresponding G551D, has no room to be well adapted in presence of ATP, and finally (5) N1303K might disturb the large Q-loop of the NBD2 a-helical subdomain (position 42 in Online Resource 1 and Online Resource 2). Login to comment

[hide] Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis us... Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209. Baker MW, Atkins AE, Cordovado SK, Hendrix M, Earley MC, Farrell PM
Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study.
Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209., [PMID:25674778]

Abstract [show]
Purpose:Many regions have implemented newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) using a limited panel of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) mutations after immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) analysis. We sought to assess the feasibility of further improving the screening using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology.Methods:An NGS assay was used to detect 162 CFTR mutations/variants characterized by the CFTR2 project. We used 67 dried blood spots (DBSs) containing 48 distinct CFTR mutations to validate the assay. NGS assay was retrospectively performed on 165 CF screen-positive samples with one CFTR mutation.Results:The NGS assay was successfully performed using DNA isolated from DBSs, and it correctly detected all CFTR mutations in the validation. Among 165 screen-positive infants with one CFTR mutation, no additional disease-causing mutation was identified in 151 samples consistent with normal sweat tests. Five infants had a CF-causing mutation that was not included in this panel, and nine with two CF-causing mutations were identified.Conclusion:The NGS assay was 100% concordant with traditional methods. Retrospective analysis results indicate an IRT/NGS screening algorithm would enable high sensitivity, better specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). This study lays the foundation for prospective studies and for introducing NGS in NBS laboratories.Genet Med advance online publication 12 February 2015Genetics in Medicine (2015); doi:10.1038/gim.2014.209.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
15 Correspondence: Mei W. Baker (mwbaker@wisc.edu) Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study Mei W. Baker, MD1,2 , Anne E. Atkins, MPH2 , Suzanne K. Cordovado, PhD3 , Miyono Hendrix, MS3 , Marie C. Earley, PhD3 and Philip M. Farrell, MD, PhD1,4 Table 1ߒ CF-causing or varying consequences mutations in the MiSeqDx IUO Cystic Fibrosis System c.1521_1523delCTT (F508del) c.2875delG (3007delG) c.54-5940_273ߙ+ߙ10250del21kb (CFTRdele2,3) c.3909C>G (N1303K) c.3752G>A (S1251N) Mutations that cause CF when combined with another CF-causing mutation c.1624G>T (G542X) c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A (3120ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3964-78_4242ߙ+ߙ577del (CFTRdele22,23) c.613C>T (P205S) c.1021T>C (S341P) c.948delT (1078delT) c.2988G>A (3120G->A) c.328G>C (D110H) c.200C>T (P67L) c.1397C>A (S466X(C>A)) c.1022_1023insTC (1154insTC) c.2989-1G>A (3121-1G->A) c.3310G>T (E1104X) c.3937C>T (Q1313X) c.1397C>G (S466X(C>G)) c.1081delT (1213delT) c.3140-26A>G (3272-26A->G) c.1753G>T (E585X) c.658C>T (Q220X) c.1466C>A (S489X) c.1116ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1248ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3528delC (3659delC) c.178G>T (E60X) c.115C>T (Q39X) c.1475C>T (S492F) c.1127_1128insA (1259insA) c.3659delC (3791delC) c.2464G>T (E822X) c.1477C>T (Q493X) c.1646G>A (S549N) c.1209ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1341ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T (3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC->T) c.2491G>T (E831X) c.1573C>T (Q525X) c.1645A>C (S549R) c.1329_1330insAGAT (1461ins4) c.3744delA (3876delA) c.274G>A (E92K) c.1654C>T (Q552X) c.1647T>G (S549R) c.1393-1G>A (1525-1G->A) c.3773_3774insT (3905insT) c.274G>T (E92X) c.2668C>T (Q890X) c.2834C>T (S945L) c.1418delG (1548delG) c.262_263delTT (394delTT) c.3731G>A (G1244E) c.292C>T (Q98X) c.1013C>T (T338I) c.1545_1546delTA (1677delTA) c.3873ߙ+ߙ1G>A (4005ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.532G>A (G178R) c.3196C>T (R1066C) c.1558G>T (V520F) c.1585-1G>A (1717-1G->A) c.3884_3885insT (4016insT) c.988G>T (G330X) c.3197G>A (R1066H) c.3266G>A (W1089X) c.1585-8G>A (1717-8G->A) c.273ߙ+ߙ1G>A (405ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.1652G>A (G551D) c.3472C>T (R1158X) c.3611G>A (W1204X) c.1679ߙ+ߙ1.6kbA>G (1811ߙ+ߙ1.6kbA->G) c.274-1G>A (406-1G->A) c.254G>A (G85E) c.3484C>T (R1162X) c.3612G>A (W1204X) c.1680-1G>A (1812-1G->A) c.4077_4080delTGTTinsAA (4209TGTT->AA) c.2908G>C (G970R) c.349C>T (R117C) c.3846G>A (W1282X) c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1898ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.4251delA (4382delA) c.595C>T (H199Y) c.1000C>T (R334W) c.1202G>A (W401X) c.1766ߙ+ߙ3A>G (1898ߙ+ߙ 3A->G) c.325_327delTATinsG (457TAT->G) c.1007T>A (I336K) c.1040G>A (R347H) c.1203G>A (W401X) c.2012delT (2143delT) c.442delA (574delA) c.1519_1521delATC (I507del) c.1040G>C (R347P) c.2537G>A (W846X) c.2051_2052delAAinsG (2183AA->G) c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T (621ߙ+ߙ 1G->T) c.2128A>T (K710X) c.1055G>A (R352Q) c.3276C>A (Y1092X (C>A)) c.2052delA (2184delA) c.531delT (663delT) c.3194T>C (L1065P) c.1657C>T (R553X) c.3276C>G (Y1092X (C>G)) c.2052_2053insA (2184insA) c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T (711ߙ+ߙ 1G->T) c.3230T>C (L1077P) c.1679G>A (R560K) c.366T>A (Y122X) c.2175_2176insA (2307insA) c.579ߙ+ߙ3A>G (711ߙ+ߙ 3A->G) c.617T>G (L206W) c.1679G>C (R560T) - c.2215delG (2347delG) c.579ߙ+ߙ5G>A (711ߙ+ߙ 5G->A) c.1400T>C (L467P) c.2125C>T (R709X) - c.2453delT (2585delT) c.580-1G>T (712-1G->T) c.2195T>G (L732X) c.223C>T (R75X) - c.2490ߙ+ߙ1G>A (2622ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.720_741delAGGGAG AATGATGATGAAGTAC (852del22) c.2780T>C (L927P) c.2290C>T (R764X) - c.2583delT (2711delT) c.1364C>A (A455E) c.3302T>A (M1101K) c.2551C>T (R851X) - c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A (2789ߙ+ߙ5G->A) c.1675G>A (A559T) c.1A>G (M1V) c.3587C>G (S1196X) - Mutations/variants that were validated in this study are in bold. CF, cystic fibrosis. Table 1ߒ Continued on next page reduce carrier detection and potentially improve the positive predictive value (PPV), the NBS goals of equity and the highest possible sensitivity become more difficult to achieve. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical diagnostic Next-Generation sequencing: th... Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 Sep;75(5):374-81. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2015.1031689. Epub 2015 Apr 15. Loukas YL, Thodi G, Molou E, Georgiou V, Dotsikas Y, Schulpis KH
Clinical diagnostic Next-Generation sequencing: the case of CFTR carrier screening.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 Sep;75(5):374-81. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2015.1031689. Epub 2015 Apr 15., [PMID:25874479]

Abstract [show]
A 23-mutation panel for CFTR carrier screening is recommended to women of reproductive age by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. In the present study the optimized efficiency regarding the carrier rate of Next-Generation sequencing (NGS) technology is compared to the one of limited mutation detection panels. A total of 824 consequent cases were subjected to the commercial Cystic Fibrosis Genotyping Assay. Some 188 negative samples randomly selected from the initial group of probands were further subjected to an extended mutation panel characterized by 92% detection rate, as well as to massive parallel sequencing. Twenty-two probands subjected to the commercial assay proved to carry one mutation included in the ACOG panel (carrier rate 0.0267). The latter panels revealed the presence of mutations not included in the ACOG panel in four probands, resulting to an increase of carrier rate of 0.0106 in the case of in-house panel and an increase of rate of 0.0213 if NGS was used. The above data seem to support the implementation of NGS in the routine CFTR carrier screening.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
94 Mutation cDNA Coverage Score Reference allele (F/R strand) Mutant allele (F/R strand) Genotype F508del* c.1521_1523delCTT 2080 26.5 491/557 523/504 HET 556delA c.424delA 2168 26.7 524/557 547/536 HET 3659delC* c.3528delC 2359 27.0 573/605 566/609 HET I507del c.1519_1521delATC 2246 26.8 508/612 619/501 HET 3849af9;10kb,Cb0e;T c.3717af9;12191Cb0e;T 3596 28.4 - 1834/1756 HOM 3849af9;10kb,Cb0e;T c.3717af9;12191Cb0e;T 4169 29.0 1023/1059 1116/967 HET R334W* c.1000Cb0e;T 2473 27.1 636/599 626/609 HET 2184delA* c.2052delA 3069 27.9 734/801 792/738 HET 394delTT* c.262_263delTT 3176 28.0 775/811 819/766 HET W1282X c.3846Gb0e;A 4268 29.0 - 2168/2096 HOM 1717-1Gb0e;A c.1585-1Gb0e;A 3863 28.7 922/1007 985/944 HET 1154insTC c.1022_1023insTC 4021 28.8 1058/1039 979/941 HET 2183AAb0e;G c.2051_2052delAAinsG 3927 28.8 1023/996 974/926 HET R553X c.1657Cb0e;T 6027 30.2 1532/1480 1476/1534 HET G542X c.1624Gb0e;T 3862 28.7 933/996 925/1002 HET G551D c.1652Gb0e;A 5225 29.7 1257/1351 1341/1268 HET G551D c.1652Gb0e;A 4862 29.5 - 2487/2369 HOM R560T c.1679Gb0e;C 3542 28.4 861/908 915/853 HET 621af9;1Gb0e;T* c.489af9;1Gb0e;T 2256 26.8 534/592 606/519 HET N1303K c.3909Cb0e;G 2126 26.6 534/528 492/568 HET 2789af9;5Gb0e;A c.2657af9;5Gb0e;A 3453 28.3 824/901 895/828 HET 3120af9;1Gb0e;A c.2988af9;1Gb0e;A 3021 27.8 721/787 802/707 HET L467P c.1400Cb0e;T 3848 28.7 928/993 1003/920 HET R1162X c.3484Cb0e;T 4180 29.0 1021/1065 1112/976 HET 711af9;1Gb0e;T c.579af9;1Gb0e;T 4222 29.0 1036/1072 1001/1108 HET A455E c.1364Cb0e;A 5621 30.0 1365/1443 1438/1370 HET 1898af9;1Gb0e;A c.1766af9;1Gb0e;A 2934 27.7 683/782 702/762 HET 3272-26Ab0e;G 3140-26Ab0e;G 3755 28.6 902/973 1008/867 HET of the majority of CFTR mutations carriers in our region. Login to comment

[hide] The improvement of the best practice guidelines fo... Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99. Girardet A, Viart V, Plaza S, Daina G, De Rycke M, Des Georges M, Fiorentino F, Harton G, Ishmukhametova A, Navarro J, Raynal C, Renwick P, Saguet F, Schwarz M, SenGupta S, Tzetis M, Roux AF, Claustres M
The improvement of the best practice guidelines for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: toward an international consensus.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99., [PMID:26014425]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorders, giving couples the opportunity to conceive unaffected children without having to consider termination of pregnancy. However, there are no available standardized protocols, so that each center has to develop its own diagnostic strategies and procedures. Furthermore, reproductive decisions are complicated by the diversity of disease-causing variants in the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene and the complexity of correlations between genotypes and associated phenotypes, so that attitudes and practices toward the risks for future offspring can vary greatly between countries. On behalf of the EuroGentest Network, eighteen experts in PGD and/or molecular diagnosis of CF from seven countries attended a workshop held in Montpellier, France, on 14 December 2011. Building on the best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD established by ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology), the goal of this meeting was to formulate specific guidelines for CF-PGD in order to contribute to a better harmonization of practices across Europe. Different topics were covered including variant nomenclature, inclusion criteria, genetic counseling, PGD strategy and reporting of results. The recommendations are summarized here, and updated information on the clinical significance of CFTR variants and associated phenotypes is presented.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 27 May 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.99.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
79 (unknown) Q39X c.115C4T p.Gln39* P67L c.200C4T p.Pro67Leu R75X c.223C4T p.Arg75* 405+1G4A c.273+1G4A 406-1G4A c.274-1G4A E92X c.274G4T p.Glu92* E92K c.274G4A p.Glu92Lys Q98X c.292C4T p.Gln98* 457TAT4G c.325_327delTATinsG p.Tyr109Glyfs*4 D110H c.328G4C p.Asp110His R117C c.349C4T p.Arg117Cys Y122X c.366 T4A p.Tyr122* 574delA c.442delA p.Ile148Leufs*5 444delA c.313delA p.Ile105Serfs*2 663delT c.531delT p.Ile177Metfs*12 G178R c.532G4A p.Gly178Arg 711+3 A4G c.579+3 A4G 711+5G4A c.579+5G4A 712-1G4T c.580-1G4T H199Y c.595C4T p.His199Tyr P205S c.613C4T p.Pro205Ser L206W c.617 T4G p.Leu206Trp Q220X c.658C4T p.Gln220* 852del22 c.720_741delAGGGAGAAT GATGATGAAGTAC p.Gly241Glufs*13 1078delT c.948delT p.Phe316Leufs*12 G330X c.988G4T p.Gly330* Table 1 (Continued ) HGVS nomenclature Legacy name cDNA nucleotide name Protein name R334W c.1000C4T p.Arg334Trp I336K c.1007 T4A p.Ile336Lys T338I c.1013C4T p.Thr338Ile 1154insTC c.1021_1022dupTC p.Phe342Hisfs*28 S341P c.1021 T4C p.Ser341Pro R347H c.1040G4A p.Arg347His 1213delT c.1081delT p.Trp361Glyfs*8 1248+1G4A c.1116+1G4A 1259insA c.1130dupA p.Gln378Alafs*4 W401X(TAG) c.1202G4A p.Trp401* W401X(TGA) c.1203G4A p.Trp401* 1341+1G4A c.1209+1G4A 1461ins4 c.1329_1330insAGAT p.Ile444Argfs*3 1525-1G4A c.1393-1G4A S466X c.1397C4A or c.1397C4G p.Ser466* L467P c.1400 T4C p.Leu467Pro S489X c.1466C4A p.Ser489* S492F c.1475C4T p.Ser492Phe 1677delTA c.1545_1546delTA p.Tyr515* V520F c.1558G4T p.Val520Phe 1717-1G4A c.1585-1G4A 1717-8G4A c.1585-8G4A S549R c.1645 A4C p.Ser549Arg S549N c.1646G4A p.Ser549Asn S549R c.1647 T4G p.Ser549Arg Q552X c.1654C4T p.Gln552* A559T c.1675G4A p.Ala559Thr 1811+1.6kbA4G c.1680-886 A4G 1812-1G4A c.1680-1G4A R560K c.1679G4A p.Arg560Lys E585X c.1753G4T p.Glu585* 1898+3 A4G c.1766+3 A4G 2143delT c.2012delT p.Leu671* 2184insA c.2052_2053insA p.Gln685Thrfs*4 2184delA c.2052delA p.Lys684Asnfs*38 R709X c.2125C4T p.Arg709* K710X c.2128 A4T p.Lys710* 2307insA c.2175dupA p.Glu726Argfs*4 L732X c.2195 T4G p.Leu732* 2347delG c.2215delG p.Val739Tyrfs*16 R764X c.2290C4T p.Arg764* 2585delT c.2453delT p.Leu818Trpfs*3 E822X c.2464G4T p.Glu822* 2622+1G4A c.2490+1G4A E831X c.2491G4T p.Glu831* W846X c.2537G4A p.Trp846* W846X (2670TGG4TGA) c.2538G4A p.Trp846* R851X c.2551C4T p.Arg851* 2711delT c.2583delT p.Phe861Leufs*3 S945L c.2834C4T p.Ser945Leu 2789+2insA c.2657+2_2657+3insA Q890X c.2668C4T p.Gln890* L927P c.2780 T4C p.Leu927Pro 3007delG c.2875delG p.Ala959Hisfs*9 G970R c.2908G4C p.Gly970Arg 3120G4A c.2988G4A function variants that cause CF disease when paired together; (ii) variants that retain residual CFTR function and are compatible with milder phenotypes such as CFTR-RD; (iii) variants with no clinical consequences; and (iv) variants of unproven or uncertain clinical relevance. Login to comment