ABCC7 p.Leu137His
| ClinVar: |
c.410T>G
,
p.Leu137Arg
?
, not provided
c.410T>A , p.Leu137His ? , not provided |
| CF databases: |
c.410T>A
,
p.Leu137His
(CFTR1)
D
, The above mutation was detected by SSCP/heteroduplex analysis and characterised by direct sequencing. It was not previously observed in over 100 non-[delta]F508 CF chromosomes. L137H was observed in an adult male presenting only with male infertility due to CBAVD. This sample was referred from the Leeds DNA lab by Lucy Ellis. His other mutation is [delta]F508.
c.410T>G , p.Leu137Arg (CFTR1) ? , This French CF patient has [delta]F508 on the other CF chromosome. This substitution creates a Cfo I site. |
| Predicted by SNAP2: | A: D (63%), C: D (53%), D: D (91%), E: D (85%), F: N (57%), G: D (91%), H: D (85%), I: D (59%), K: D (91%), M: N (66%), N: D (85%), P: D (91%), Q: D (80%), R: D (91%), S: D (80%), T: D (80%), V: N (61%), W: D (85%), Y: D (80%), |
| Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: N, C: N, D: D, E: D, F: N, G: D, H: D, I: N, K: D, M: N, N: D, P: D, Q: D, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: N, W: D, Y: N, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Do common in silico tools predict the clinical con... Clin Genet. 2010 May;77(5):464-73. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Dorfman R, Nalpathamkalam T, Taylor C, Gonska T, Keenan K, Yuan XW, Corey M, Tsui LC, Zielenski J, Durie P
Do common in silico tools predict the clinical consequences of amino-acid substitutions in the CFTR gene?
Clin Genet. 2010 May;77(5):464-73. Epub 2009 Jan 6., [PMID:20059485]
Abstract [show]
Computational methods are used to predict the molecular consequences of amino-acid substitutions on the basis of evolutionary conservation or protein structure, but their utility in clinical diagnosis or prediction of disease outcome has not been well validated. We evaluated three popular computer programs, namely, PANTHER, SIFT and PolyPhen, by comparing the predicted clinical outcomes for a group of known CFTR missense mutations against the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) and clinical manifestations in cohorts of subjects with CF-disease and CFTR-related disorders carrying these mutations. Owing to poor specificity, none of tools reliably distinguished between individual mutations that confer CF disease from mutations found in subjects with a CFTR-related disorder or no disease. Prediction scores for CFTR mutations derived from PANTHER showed a significant overall statistical correlation with the spectrum of disease severity associated with mutations in the CFTR gene. In contrast, PolyPhen- and SIFT-derived scores only showed significant differences between CF-causing and non-CF variants. Current computational methods are not recommended for establishing or excluding a CF diagnosis, notably as a newborn screening strategy or in patients with equivocal test results.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
64 Mutations in the CFTR gene grouped by clinical category Cystic fibrosis CFTR-related disease No disease T338I D614G L320V V920L L90S M470V H199R S1251N I203M G550R P111A I148T Q1291H R560K L1388Q L183I R170H I1027T S549R D443Y P499A L1414S T908N R668C S549N A455E E1401K Q151K G27E I1234L Y563N R347P C866R S1118C P1290S R75Q A559T V520F P841R M469V E1401G P67L G85E S50Y E1409K R933G G458V G178R Y1032C R248T I980K G85V V392G L973P L137H T351S R334W I444S V938G R792G R560T R555G L1339F D1305E P574H V1240G T1053I D58G G551D L1335P I918M F994C S945L L558S F1337V R810G D1152H G1247R P574S R766M D579G W1098R H949R F200I R352Q L1077P K1351E M244K L206W M1101K D1154G L375F N1303K R1066C E528D D110Y R347H R1070Q A800G P1021S S549K A1364V V392A damaging` (is supposed to affect protein function or structure) and 'probably damaging` (high confidence of affecting protein function or structure).
X
ABCC7 p.Leu137His 20059485:64:433
status: NEW[hide] A comparison of fluorescent SSCP and denaturing HP... Hum Mutat. 2000;15(6):556-64. Ellis LA, Taylor CF, Taylor GR
A comparison of fluorescent SSCP and denaturing HPLC for high throughput mutation scanning.
Hum Mutat. 2000;15(6):556-64., [PMID:10862085]
Abstract [show]
We examined 67 different mutations in 16 different amplicons in a comparison of mutation detection by fluorescent single strand conformation polymorphism (F-SSCP) and by denaturing HPLC (DHPLC). F-SSCP was used to analyze fluorescent amplicons with internal size standards and automated fragment analysis (GeneScan, PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). In DHPLC, unlabelled amplicons were analyzed by reverse phase HPLC with fragment detection by absorbance at 260nm. Both methods had high sensitivity (95-100%) and specificity (100%). Overall, F-SSCP with external temperature control was the more sensitive method, but DHPLC was particularly useful for the rapid analysis of novel fragments.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
97 Comparison of F-SSCP and DHPLC Using a Panel of ABCC7 Mutations Gel condition Location Location 49:1 49:1 49:1 49:1 MDE MDE MDE Capillary DHPLC °C from 5' (bp) from 3' (bp) 15 20 25 35 20 25 35 35 N/A Exon 3 (320bp) E60X 128 192 + + + + + + + + - P67L 150 170 + + + - + + + - + R75X 173 147 + + + + + + + + + R75Q 174 146 + + + - + + + + + G85E 204 116 + + + - + + + + + L88S 213 107 + + + + + + + + + Exon 4 (400bp) 441delA 135 265 + + + + + + + + + D110H 154 246 + + + + + + - + + R117H/H 176 224 + + + + + + + + N/A R117R/H 176 224 + + + + + + + + + L137H 236 164 + + + + + + + + + I148T 261 139 + + + + + + + + + 621+1 (G>T) 309 91 + + + + + + + + + Exon 7 (360bp) R334W 180 180 + + + + + + + - + 1058delC 105 255 + + + + + + + + + 1078delT 125 235 + + + - + + + + + 1138insG 226 134 - + + - + + + + + 1154insTC 202 158 + + + + + + + + + 1161delC 209 151 + + + + + + + + + R347H 220 140 + + + + + + - + + R347P 220 140 + + + - + + + - + A349V 226 134 + + + + + + + + + W356X 248 112 + + + + + + + + + Exon 10 (365bp) M470V 143 222 + + + + + + + + + Q493X 212 153 + + + + + + - + - DelF508 255 110 + + + + + + + + - Del I507 253 112 + + + + + + + + + V520F 293 72 + + - + + - + - + Exon 11 (190bp) 1717-1 (G>A) 54 136 + + + - + + - + + G542X 94 96 + + + - + + - + + S549N 116 74 + + + + + + + + - S549R 117 73 + + + + - - - + + G551D 122 68 + - - - + + + - + R553X 127 63 + + + + + + + + + G551D/R553X + + + + + + + + + R560T 149 41 + + + - - - - - + R560K 149 41 + + + - + + + - + 1811+1 (G>C) 150 40 + + + + + + + + + Exon 12 (250bp) 1898+1(G>A) 167 83 + + + + + + - + + Exon 13a (290bp) C590W 87 203 + + - - + - - + + Exon 13b (405bp) 2184insA 148 257 + + + + + + + - + R709X 220 185 - + - - - - - - + V754M 453 52 + + + + + + + - - Exon 13c (345bp) V754M 65 280 + + + + + + - - + R785X 158 187 + + - - + + - - + Exon 19 (370bp) 3601-17 (T>C) 29 341 - + + - + + + - + R1162X 61 309 + + - - + - - + + 3659delC 105 265 - - - + + + + + + Y1182X 123 247 - + + - + + + - + Exon 20 (370bp) W1282X 186 184 + + + + + + + + + % detected 90 96 86 66 94 88 74 72 90 remainder were detected using DGGE.
X
ABCC7 p.Leu137His 10862085:97:558
status: NEW