ABCC7 p.Tyr84His
| CF databases: |
c.250T>C
,
p.Tyr84His
(CFTR1)
?
, The mutation was detected by DGGE analysis and characterised by direct sequencing. We have seen it only once, in over 2000 control chromosomes from Italian population.
|
| Predicted by SNAP2: | A: D (59%), C: D (63%), D: D (80%), E: D (80%), F: N (61%), G: D (71%), H: D (53%), I: D (59%), K: D (80%), L: N (57%), M: D (63%), N: D (75%), P: D (85%), Q: D (66%), R: D (75%), S: D (59%), T: D (66%), V: D (59%), W: D (71%), |
| Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: N, C: N, D: N, E: N, F: N, G: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: N, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] A 10-year large-scale cystic fibrosis carrier scre... J Cyst Fibros. 2010 Jan;9(1):29-35. Epub 2009 Nov 7. Picci L, Cameran M, Marangon O, Marzenta D, Ferrari S, Frigo AC, Scarpa M
A 10-year large-scale cystic fibrosis carrier screening in the Italian population.
J Cyst Fibros. 2010 Jan;9(1):29-35. Epub 2009 Nov 7., [PMID:19897426]
Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common autosomal recessive genetic disorders, with the majority of patients born to couples unaware of their carrier status. Carrier screenings might help reducing the incidence of CF. METHODS: We used a semi-automated reverse-dot blot assay identifying the 47 most common CFTR gene mutations followed by DGGE/dHPLC analysis. RESULTS: Results of a 10-year (1996-2006) CF carrier screening on 57,999 individuals with no prior family history of CF are reported. Of these, 25,104 were couples and 7791 singles, with 77.9% from the Italian Veneto region. CFTR mutations were found in 1879 carriers (frequency 1/31), with DeltaF508 being the most common (42.6%). Subjects undergoing medically assisted reproduction (MAR) had significantly (p<0.0001) higher CF carrier frequency (1/22 vs 1/32) compared to non-MAR subjects. CONCLUSIONS: If coupled to counselling programmes, CF carrier screening tests might help reducing the CF incidence.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
131 Aminoacid change Nucleotide change A349V 1178C→T D372E 1251T→G D674V 2153A→T D806G 2549A→G I586V 1888A→G I807V 2551A→G I840T 2651T→C L1335F 4135C→T L1414S 4373T→C L1480P 4571T→C M348T 1175T→C N416S 1379A→G P1290T 4000C→T P355S 1195C→T Q1268R 3935A→G Q1352E 4186C→G S431G 2423A→G S660T 2110T→A S911R 2865T→G T1263A 3919A→G T788I 2495C→T V920L 2890G→T Y1381H 4273T→C Y84H 382T→C two CFTR mutations and who had not been previously diagnosed with CF [29].
X
ABCC7 p.Tyr84His 19897426:131:526
status: NEW[hide] CFTR, SPINK1, CTRC and PRSS1 variants in chronic p... Gut. 2012 Mar 17. Rosendahl J, Landt O, Bernadova J, Kovacs P, Teich N, Bodeker H, Keim V, Ruffert C, Mossner J, Kage A, Stumvoll M, Groneberg D, Kruger R, Luck W, Treiber M, Becker M, Witt H
CFTR, SPINK1, CTRC and PRSS1 variants in chronic pancreatitis: is the role of mutated CFTR overestimated?
Gut. 2012 Mar 17., [PMID:22427236]
Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: In chronic pancreatitis (CP), alterations in several genes have so far been described, but only small cohorts have been extensively investigated for all predisposing genes. DESIGN: 660 patients with idiopathic or hereditary CP and up to 1758 controls were enrolled. PRSS1, SPINK1 and CTRC were analysed by DNA sequencing, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) by melting curve analysis. RESULTS: Frequencies of CFTR variants p.R75Q, p.I148T, 5T-allele and p.E528E were comparable in patients and controls. We identified 103 CFTR variants, which represents a 2.7-fold risk increase (p<0.0001). Severe cystic fibrosis (CF)-causing variants increased the risk of developing CP 2.9-fold, and mild CF-causing variants 4.5-fold (p<0.0001 for both). Combined CF-causing variants increased CP risk 3.4-fold (p<0.0001), while non-CF-causing variants displayed a 1.5-fold over-representation in patients (p=0.14). CFTR compound heterozygous status with variant classes CF-causing severe and mild represented an OR of 16.1 (p<0.0001). Notably, only 9/660 (1.4%) patients were compound heterozygotes in this category. Trans-heterozygosity increased CP risk, with an OR of 38.7, with 43/660 (6.5%) patients and 3/1667 (0.2%) controls being trans-heterozygous (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Accumulation of CFTR variants in CP is less pronounced than reported previously, with ORs between 2.7 and 4.5. Only CF-causing variants reached statistical significance. Compound and trans-heterozygosity is an overt risk factor for the development of CP, but the number of CFTR compound heterozygotes in particular is rather low. In summary, the study demonstrates the complexity of genetic interactions in CP and a minor influence of CFTR alterations in CP development.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
140 Variant distribution in patients aged >20 and <20 years In younger patients, overall PRSS1 variants were 2.9-fold more common (>20 years: 9/239, 3.8%; <20 years: 46/421, 10.9%; p¼0.001, OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 6.5), whereas overall SPINK1 variants were similarly distributed (56/239, 23.4%; 73/421, Table 2 CFTR variants detected by melting curve analysis Gene Variant Patients Controls p Value OR (95% CI) CFTR (CF-causing, severe) p.F508del 44/660 (6.7%) 48/1758 (2.7%) <0.0001 2.5 (1.7 to 3.9) p.R117H (5T/7T) 2/660 (0.3%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.G542X 1/660 (0.2%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e c.1717-1G>A 3/660 (0.5%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.E585X 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e c.2183AA>G 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.R1158X 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.R1162X 1/660 (0.3%) 0/1758 NS e p.N1303K 3/660 (0.5%) 0/1758 NS e Total 55/660 (8.3%) 53/1758 (3%) <0.0001 2.9 (2 to 4.3) CFTR (CF-causing mild) p.R117H (7T/7T) 13/660 (2%) 8/1758 (0.5%) 0.0009 4.4 (1.8 to 10.7) p.R117H (7T/9T) 3/660 (0.5%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.R347H 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.R347P 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.A455E 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e c.2657+5G>A 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.D1152H 3/660 (0.5%) 5/1758 (0.3%) NS e Total 23/660 (3.5%) 14/1758 (0.8%) <0.0001 4.5 (2.3 to 8.8) CFTR (non CF-causing) p.R74Q 2/660 (0.3%) 0/1758 NS e p.R75Q (het)* 29/660 (4.4%) 59/1758 (3.4%) NS e p.R75Q (hom)* 2/660 (0.3%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.Y84H 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.A120T 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.I148T* 4/660 (0.6%) 11/1758 (0.6%) NS e p.I507V 1/660 (0.2%) 2/1758 (0.1%) NS e p.F508C 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e c.1716+12T>C 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.E528E (het)* 36/660 (5.5%) 82/1758 (4.7%) NS e p.E528E (hom)* 0/660 2/1758 (0.1%) NS e c.1898+8C>G 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.H667Y 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.R668C 5/660 (0.8%) 3/1758 (0.2%) NS e p.G691R 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.L997F 5/660 (0.8%) 6/1758 (0.3%) NS e p.S1235R 10/660 (1.5%) 18/1758 (1.0%) NS e Total (excluded)* 25/660 (3.8%) 45/1758 (2.6%) NS e CFTR (CF-causing) Total (all) 78/660 (11.8%) 67/1758 (3.8%) <0.0001 3.4 (2.4 to 4.8) CFTR (all) Total (excluded)* 103/660 (15.6%) 112/1758 (6.4%) <0.0001 2.7 (2 to 3.6) The table is divided into three parts.
X
ABCC7 p.Tyr84His 22427236:140:1391
status: NEW135 Variant distribution in patients aged >20 and <20 years In younger patients, overall PRSS1 variants were 2.9-fold more common (>20 years: 9/239, 3.8%; <20 years: 46/421, 10.9%; p&#bc;0.001, OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 6.5), whereas overall SPINK1 variants were similarly distributed (56/239, 23.4%; 73/421, Table 2 CFTR variants detected by melting curve analysis Gene Variant Patients Controls p Value OR (95% CI) CFTR (CF-causing, severe) p.F508del 44/660 (6.7%) 48/1758 (2.7%) <0.0001 2.5 (1.7 to 3.9) p.R117H (5T/7T) 2/660 (0.3%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.G542X 1/660 (0.2%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e c.1717-1G>A 3/660 (0.5%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.E585X 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e c.2183AA>G 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.R1158X 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.R1162X 1/660 (0.3%) 0/1758 NS e p.N1303K 3/660 (0.5%) 0/1758 NS e Total 55/660 (8.3%) 53/1758 (3%) <0.0001 2.9 (2 to 4.3) CFTR (CF-causing mild) p.R117H (7T/7T) 13/660 (2%) 8/1758 (0.5%) 0.0009 4.4 (1.8 to 10.7) p.R117H (7T/9T) 3/660 (0.5%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.R347H 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.R347P 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.A455E 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e c.2657+5G>A 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.D1152H 3/660 (0.5%) 5/1758 (0.3%) NS e Total 23/660 (3.5%) 14/1758 (0.8%) <0.0001 4.5 (2.3 to 8.8) CFTR (non CF-causing) p.R74Q 2/660 (0.3%) 0/1758 NS e p.R75Q (het)* 29/660 (4.4%) 59/1758 (3.4%) NS e p.R75Q (hom)* 2/660 (0.3%) 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.Y84H 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.A120T 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.I148T* 4/660 (0.6%) 11/1758 (0.6%) NS e p.I507V 1/660 (0.2%) 2/1758 (0.1%) NS e p.F508C 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e c.1716+12T>C 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.E528E (het)* 36/660 (5.5%) 82/1758 (4.7%) NS e p.E528E (hom)* 0/660 2/1758 (0.1%) NS e c.1898+8C>G 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.H667Y 1/660 (0.2%) 0/1758 NS e p.R668C 5/660 (0.8%) 3/1758 (0.2%) NS e p.G691R 0/660 1/1758 (0.06%) NS e p.L997F 5/660 (0.8%) 6/1758 (0.3%) NS e p.S1235R 10/660 (1.5%) 18/1758 (1.0%) NS e Total (excluded)* 25/660 (3.8%) 45/1758 (2.6%) NS e CFTR (CF-causing) Total (all) 78/660 (11.8%) 67/1758 (3.8%) <0.0001 3.4 (2.4 to 4.8) CFTR (all) Total (excluded)* 103/660 (15.6%) 112/1758 (6.4%) <0.0001 2.7 (2 to 3.6) The table is divided into three parts.
X
ABCC7 p.Tyr84His 22427236:135:1390
status: NEW