ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Arg1066Met

Admin's notes:	Class II (maturation defect) Veit et al.
ClinVar:	c.3197G>A , p.Arg1066His D , Pathogenic c.3197G>T , p.Arg1066Leu ? , not provided c.3196C>A , p.Arg1066Ser ? , not provided c.3196C>T , p.Arg1066Cys D , Pathogenic
CF databases:	c.3197G>A , p.Arg1066His D , CF-causing ; CFTR1: This mutation was found on one CF chromosome, the other haplotype carries an unidentified mutation. The child is twenty years old, pancreatic sufficient, that missense mutation could be considered as a mild allele. c.3196C>T , p.Arg1066Cys D , CF-causing ; CFTR1: This mutation cannot be detected by restriction enzyme analysis, and they have been observed only once among 65 non-[delta]F508 CF chromosomes. c.3196C>G , p.Arg1066Gly (CFTR1) D , c.3196C>A , p.Arg1066Ser (CFTR1) ? , The above mutation was found by DGGE and direct sequencing in Caucasian patients. c.3197G>T , p.Arg1066Leu (CFTR1) ? , This is the third mutation describe at this codon 1066 which contains a CpG dinucleotide and appears to be a hot spot for mutations. The mutation was found once among more than 250 CF chromosomes we have analyzed in exon 17b.
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (95%), C: D (71%), D: D (95%), E: D (95%), F: D (95%), G: D (95%), H: D (53%), I: D (95%), K: D (95%), L: D (95%), M: D (95%), N: D (95%), P: D (95%), Q: D (95%), S: D (95%), T: D (95%), V: D (95%), W: D (95%), Y: D (95%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: N, L: D, M: D, N: D, P: D, Q: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

II (maturation defect) <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823392">Veit et al.</a>
admin on 2016-08-19 15:16:22

Publications
[hide] Pharmacological induction of CFTR function in pati... Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005 Sep;40(3):183-96. Kerem E
Pharmacological induction of CFTR function in patients with cystic fibrosis: mutation-specific therapy.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005 Sep;40(3):183-96., [PMID:15880796]

Abstract [show]
CFTR mutations cause defects of CFTR protein production and function by different molecular mechanisms. Mutations can be classified according to the mechanisms by which they disrupt CFTR function. This understanding of the different molecular mechanisms of CFTR dysfunction provides the scientific basis for the development of targeted drugs for mutation-specific therapy of cystic fibrosis (CF). Class I mutations are nonsense mutations that result in the presence of a premature stop codon that leads to the production of unstable mRNA, or the release from the ribosome of a short, truncated protein that is not functional. Aminoglycoside antibiotics can suppress premature termination codons by disrupting translational fidelity and allowing the incorporation of an amino acid, thus permitting translation to continue to the normal termination of the transcript. Class II mutations cause impairment of CFTR processing and folding in the Golgi. As a result, the mutant CFTR is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and eventually targeted for degradation by the quality control mechanisms. Chemical and molecular chaperones such as sodium-4-phenylbutyrate can stabilize protein structure, and allow it to escape from degradation in the ER and be transported to the cell membrane. Class III mutations disrupt the function of the regulatory domain. CFTR is resistant to phosphorylation or adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP) binding. CFTR activators such as alkylxanthines (CPX) and the flavonoid genistein can overcome affected ATP binding through direct binding to a nucleotide binding fold. In patients carrying class IV mutations, phosphorylation of CFTR results in reduced chloride transport. Increases in the overall cell surface content of these mutants might overcome the relative reduction in conductance. Alternatively, restoring native chloride pore characteristics pharmacologically might be effective. Activators of CFTR at the plasma membrane may function by promoting CFTR phosphorylation, by blocking CFTR dephosphorylation, by interacting directly with CFTR, and/or by modulation of CFTR protein-protein interactions. Class V mutations affect the splicing machinery and generate both aberrantly and correctly spliced transcripts, the levels of which vary among different patients and among different organs of the same patient. Splicing factors that promote exon inclusion or factors that promote exon skipping can promote increases of correctly spliced transcripts, depending on the molecular defect. Inconsistent results were reported regarding the required level of corrected or mutated CFTR that had to be reached in order to achieve normal function.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
58 C-D565G II DF508 D1507 S549R S549I S549N S549R S945D S945L H1054D G1061R L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P H1085R N1303K G85E III G551D S492F V520F R553G R560T R560S Y569D IV R117H, R117C, R117P, R117L D1152H, L88S, G91R, E92K, Q98R, P205S, L206W, L227R, F311L, G314E, R334W, R334Q, I336K, T338I, L346P, R347C, R347H, R347L, R347P, L927P, R1070W, R1070Q V 3849 þ 10 kb C ! Login to comment

[hide] Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mu... J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Van Goor F, Yu H, Burton B, Hoffman BJ
Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mutations associated with defects in protein processing or function.
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 23., [PMID:23891399]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor (KALYDECO, VX-770) is a CFTR potentiator that increased CFTR channel activity and improved lung function in patients age 6 years and older with CF who have the G551D-CFTR gating mutation. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of ivacaftor on mutant CFTR protein forms with defects in protein processing and/or channel function. METHODS: The effect of ivacaftor on CFTR function was tested in electrophysiological studies using a panel of Fischer rat thyroid (FRT) cells expressing 54 missense CFTR mutations that cause defects in the amount or function of CFTR at the cell surface. RESULTS: Ivacaftor potentiated multiple mutant CFTR protein forms that produce functional CFTR at the cell surface. These included mutant CFTR forms with mild defects in CFTR processing or mild defects in CFTR channel conductance. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro data indicated that ivacaftor is a broad acting CFTR potentiator and could be used to help stratify patients with CF who have different CFTR genotypes for studies investigating the potential clinical benefit of ivacaftor.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
44 None M1V A46D E56K P67L R74W G85E E92K D110E D110H R117C R117H E193K L206W R334W I336K T338I S341P R347H R347P R352Q A455E L467P S492F F508del V520F A559T R560S R560T A561E Y569D D579G R668C L927P S945L S977F L997F F1052V H1054D K1060T L1065P R1066C R1066H R1066M A1067T R1070Q R1070W F1074L L1077P H1085R M1101K D1152H S1235R D1270N N1303K 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 * * * CFTR Mutation mRNA (% Normal CFTR) Fig. 1. Login to comment
64 Mutant CFTR form CFTR processing Mature/total % Normal CFTR Normal 0.89 &#b1; 0.01 100.0 &#b1; 18.5 G85E -0.05 &#b1; 0.04 -1.0 &#b1; 0.9 R560S 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 R1066C 0.02 &#b1; 0.01 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 S492F 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 R560T 0.01 &#b1; 0.01 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 V520F 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 M1101K 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 A561E 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 R1066M 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.4 N1303K 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.3 A559T 0.16 &#b1; 0.09 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 M1V 0.06 &#b1; 0.06 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 Y569D 0.11 &#b1; 0.04 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 R1066H 0.08 &#b1; 0.02a 0.7 &#b1; 0.2a L1065P 0.05 &#b1; 0.05 1.0 &#b1; 0.8 L467P 0.10 &#b1; 0.07 1.2 &#b1; 0.8 L1077P 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 1.5 &#b1; 0.6 A46D 0.21 &#b1; 0.08 1.9 &#b1; 0.5a E92K 0.06 &#b1; 0.05 1.9 &#b1; 1.3 H1054D 0.09 &#b1; 0.04 1.9 &#b1; 0.8 F508del 0.09 &#b1; 0.02a 2.3 &#b1; 0.5a H1085R 0.06 &#b1; 0.01a 3.0 &#b1; 0.7a I336K 0.42 &#b1; 0.05a 6.5 &#b1; 0.7a L206W 0.35 &#b1; 0.10a 6.8 &#b1; 1.7a F1074L 0.52 &#b1; 0.03a 10.9 &#b1; 0.6a A455E 0.26 &#b1; 0.10a 11.5 &#b1; 2.5a E56K 0.29 &#b1; 0.04a 12.2 &#b1; 1.5a R347P 0.48 &#b1; 0.04a 14.6 &#b1; 1.8a R1070W 0.61 &#b1; 0.04a 16.3 &#b1; 0.6a P67L 0.36 &#b1; 0.04a 28.4 &#b1; 6.8a R1070Q 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a 29.5 &#b1; 1.4a S977F 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a 37.3 &#b1; 2.4a A1067T 0.78 &#b1; 0.03a 38.6 &#b1; 6.1a D579G 0.72 &#b1; 0.02a 39.3 &#b1; 3.1a D1270N 1.00 &#b1; 0.00a,c 40.7 &#b1; 1.2a S945L 0.65 &#b1; 0.04a 42.4 &#b1; 8.9a L927P 0.89 &#b1; 0.01a,b 43.5 &#b1; 2.5a,b R117C 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 49.1 &#b1; 2.9a,b T338I 0.93 &#b1; 0.03a,b 54.2 &#b1; 3.7a,b L997F 0.90 &#b1; 0.04a,b 59.8 &#b1; 10.4a,b D110H 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a,b 60.6 &#b1; 1.5a,b S341P 0.79 &#b1; 0.02a 65.0 &#b1; 4.9a,b R668C 0.94 &#b1; 0.03a,b 68.5 &#b1; 1.9a,b R74W 0.78 &#b1; 0.01a 69.0 &#b1; 2.7a,b D110E 0.92 &#b1; 0.05a,b 87.5 &#b1; 9.5a,b R334W 0.91 &#b1; 0.05a,b 97.6 &#b1; 10.0a,b K1060T 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 109.9 &#b1; 28.0a,b R347H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 120.7 &#b1; 2.8a,b S1235R 0.96 &#b1; 0.00a,c 139.0 &#b1; 9.0a,b E193K 0.84 &#b1; 0.02a,b 143.0 &#b1; 17.1a,b R117H 0.86 &#b1; 0.01a,b 164.5 &#b1; 34.2a,b R352Q 0.98 &#b1; 0.01a,b 179.9 &#b1; 8.0a,c F1052V 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a,b 189.9 &#b1; 33.1a,b D1152H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 312.0 &#b1; 45.5a,b Notes to Table 1: Quantification of steady-state CFTR maturation expressed as the mean (&#b1;SEM; n = 5-9) ratio of mature CFTR to total CFTR (immature plus mature) or level of mature mutant CFTR relative to mature normal-CFTR (% normal CFTR) in FRT cells individually expressing CFTR mutations. Login to comment
74 Because the level of CFTR mRNA was similar across the panel of cell lines tested, the range in baseline activity and ivacaftor response likely reflects the severity of the functional defect and/or the 0 50 100 150 200 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L E56K P67L R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V Baseline With ivacaftor * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chloride transport (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form 0 100 200 300 400 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L P67L E56K R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mature CFTR (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form A B Fig. 2. Login to comment
82 Mutation Patientsa Chloride transport (bc;A/cm2 ) Chloride transport (% normal) EC50 Baseline With ivacaftor Baseline With ivacaftor Fold increase over baselineb Normal 204.5 &#b1; 33.3 301.3 &#b1; 33.8c 100.0 &#b1; 16.3 147.3 &#b1; 16.5c 1.5 266 &#b1; 42 G551D 1282 1.5 &#b1; 0.7 113.2 &#b1; 13.0c 1.0 &#b1; 0.5 55.3 &#b1; 6.3c 55.3 312 &#b1; 73 F1052V 12 177.3 &#b1; 13.7 410.2 &#b1; 11.3c 86.7 &#b1; 6.7 200.7 &#b1; 5.6c 2.3 177 &#b1; 14 S1235R ND 160.6 &#b1; 25.7 352.1 &#b1; 43.4c 78.5 &#b1; 12.6 172.2 &#b1; 21.2c 2.2 282 &#b1; 104 D1152H 185 117.3 &#b1; 23.0 282.7 &#b1; 46.9c 57.4 &#b1; 11.2 138.2 &#b1; 22.9c 2.4 178 &#b1; 67 D1270N 32 109.5 &#b1; 20.5 209.5 &#b1; 27.4c 53.6 &#b1; 10.0 102.4 &#b1; 13.4c 1.9 254 &#b1; 56 R668C 45 99.0 &#b1; 9.4 217.6 &#b1; 11.7c 48.4 &#b1; 4.6 106.4 &#b1; 5.7c 2.2 517 &#b1; 105 K1060T ND 89.0 &#b1; 9.8 236.4 &#b1; 20.3c 43.5 &#b1; 4.8 115.6 &#b1; 9.9c 2.7 131 &#b1; 73 R74W 25 86.8 &#b1; 26.9 199.1 &#b1; 16.8c 42.5 &#b1; 13.2 97.3 &#b1; 8.2c 2.3 162 &#b1; 17 R117H 739 67.2 &#b1; 13.3 274.1 &#b1; 32.2c 32.9 &#b1; 6.5 134.0 &#b1; 15.7c 4.1 151 &#b1; 14 E193K ND 62.2 &#b1; 9.8 379.1 &#b1; 1.1c 30.4 &#b1; 4.8 185.4 &#b1; 1.0c 6.1 240 &#b1; 20 A1067T ND 55.9 &#b1; 3.2 164.0 &#b1; 9.7c 27.3 &#b1; 1.6 80.2 &#b1; 4.7c 2.9 317 &#b1; 214 L997F 27 43.7 &#b1; 3.2 145.5 &#b1; 4.0c 21.4 &#b1; 1.6 71.2 &#b1; 2.0c 3.3 162 &#b1; 12 R1070Q 15 42.0 &#b1; 0.8 67.3 &#b1; 2.9c 20.6 &#b1; 0.4 32.9 &#b1; 1.4c 1.6 164 &#b1; 20 D110E ND 23.3 &#b1; 4.7 96.4 &#b1; 15.6c 11.4 &#b1; 2.3 47.1 &#b1; 7.6c 4.1 213 &#b1; 51 D579G 21 21.5 &#b1; 4.1 192.0 &#b1; 18.5c 10.5 &#b1; 2.0 93.9 &#b1; 9.0c 8.9 239 &#b1; 48 D110H 30 18.5 &#b1; 2.2 116.7 &#b1; 11.3c 9.1 &#b1; 1.1 57.1 &#b1; 5.5c 6.2 249 &#b1; 59 R1070W 13 16.6 &#b1; 2.6 102.1 &#b1; 3.1c 8.1 &#b1; 1.3 49.9 &#b1; 1.5c 6.2 158 &#b1; 48 P67L 53 16.0 &#b1; 6.7 88.7 &#b1; 15.7c 7.8 &#b1; 3.3 43.4 &#b1; 7.7c 5.6 195 &#b1; 40 E56K ND 15.8 &#b1; 3.1 63.6 &#b1; 4.4c 7.7 &#b1; 1.5 31.1 &#b1; 2.2c 4.0 123 &#b1; 33 F1074L ND 14.0 &#b1; 3.4 43.5 &#b1; 5.4c 6.9 &#b1; 1.6 21.3 &#b1; 2.6c 3.1 141 &#b1; 19 A455E 120 12.9 &#b1; 2.6 36.4 &#b1; 2.5c 6.3 &#b1; 1.2 17.8 &#b1; 1.2c 2.8 170 &#b1; 44 S945L 63 12.3 &#b1; 3.9 154.9 &#b1; 47.6c 6.0 &#b1; 1.9 75.8 &#b1; 23.3c 12.6 181 &#b1; 36 S977F 9 11.3 &#b1; 6.2 42.5 &#b1; 19.1c 5.5 &#b1; 3.0 20.8 &#b1; 9.3c 3.8 283 &#b1; 36 R347H 65 10.9 &#b1; 3.3 106.3 &#b1; 7.6c 5.3 &#b1; 1.6 52.0 &#b1; 3.7c 9.8 280 &#b1; 35 L206W 81 10.3 &#b1; 1.7 36.4 &#b1; 2.8c 5.0 &#b1; 0.8 17.8 &#b1; 1.4c 3.6 101 &#b1; 13 R117C 61 5.8 &#b1; 1.5 33.7 &#b1; 7.8c 2.9 &#b1; 0.7 16.5 &#b1; 3.8c 5.7 380 &#b1; 136 R352Q 46 5.5 &#b1; 1.0 84.5 &#b1; 7.8c 2.7 &#b1; 0.5 41.3 &#b1; 3.8c 15.2 287 &#b1; 75 R1066H 29 3.0 &#b1; 0.3 8.0 &#b1; 0.8c 1.5 &#b1; 0.1 3.9 &#b1; 0.4c 2.6 390 &#b1; 179 T338I 54 2.9 &#b1; 0.8 16.1 &#b1; 2.4c 1.4 &#b1; 0.4 7.9 &#b1; 1.2c 5.6 334 &#b1; 38 R334W 150 2.6 &#b1; 0.5 10.0 &#b1; 1.4c 1.3 &#b1; 0.2 4.9 &#b1; 0.7c 3.8 259 &#b1; 103 G85E 262 1.6 &#b1; 1.0 1.5 &#b1; 1.2 0.8 &#b1; 0.5 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS A46D ND 2.0 &#b1; 0.6 1.1 &#b1; 1.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS I336K 29 1.8 &#b1; 0.2 7.4 &#b1; 0.1c 0.9 &#b1; 0.1 3.6 &#b1; 0.1c 4 735 &#b1; 204 H1054D ND 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 8.7 &#b1; 0.3c 0.8 &#b1; 0.1 4.2 &#b1; 0.1c 5.3 187 &#b1; 20 F508del 29,018 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 12.1 &#b1; 1.7c 0.4 &#b1; 0.3 5.9 &#b1; 0.8c 14.8 129 &#b1; 38 M1V 9 0.7 &#b1; 1.4 6.5 &#b1; 1.9c 0.4 &#b1; 0.7 3.2 &#b1; 0.9c 8.0 183 &#b1; 85 E92K 14 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 4.3 &#b1; 0.8c 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 2.1 &#b1; 0.4c 7.0 198 &#b1; 46 V520F 58 0.4 &#b1; 0.2 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS H1085R ND 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 2.1 &#b1; 0.4 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS R560T 180 0.3 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.5 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS L927P 15 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 10.7 &#b1; 1.7c 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 5.2 &#b1; 0.8c 52.0 313 &#b1; 66 R560S ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 -0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 -0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS N1303K 1161 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS M1101K 79 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1077P 42 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066M ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066C 100 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1065P 25 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS Y569D 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS A561E ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS A559T 43 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S492F 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 1.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS L467P 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R347P 214 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S341P 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS a Number of individuals with the individual mutation in the CFTR-2 database (www.CFTR2.org). Login to comment

[hide] Murine and human CFTR exhibit different sensitivit... Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015 Oct 1;309(7):L687-99. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00181.2015. Epub 2015 Jul 24. Cui G, McCarty NA
Murine and human CFTR exhibit different sensitivities to CFTR potentiators.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015 Oct 1;309(7):L687-99. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00181.2015. Epub 2015 Jul 24., [PMID:26209275]

Abstract [show]
Development of therapeutic molecules with clinical efficacy as modulators of defective CFTR includes efforts to identify potentiators that can overcome or repair the gating defect in mutant CFTR channels. This has taken a great leap forward with the identification of the potentiator VX-770, now available to patients as "Kalydeco." Other small molecules with different chemical structure also are capable of potentiating the activity of either wild-type or mutant CFTR, suggesting that there are features of the protein that may be targeted to achieve stimulation of channel activity by structurally diverse compounds. However, neither the mechanisms by which these compounds potentiate mutant CFTR nor the site(s) where these compounds bind have been identified. This knowledge gap partly reflects the lack of appropriate experimental models to provide clues toward the identification of binding sites. Here, we have compared the channel behavior and response to novel and known potentiators of human CFTR (hCFTR) and murine (mCFTR) expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Both hCFTR and mCFTR were blocked by GlyH-101 from the extracellular side, but mCFTR activity was increased with GlyH-101 applied directly to the cytoplasmic side. Similarly, glibenclamide only exhibited a blocking effect on hCFTR but both blocked and potentiated mCFTR in excised membrane patches and in intact oocytes. The clinically used CFTR potentiator VX-770 transiently increased hCFTR by approximately 13% but potentiated mCFTR significantly more strongly. Our results suggest that mCFTR pharmacological sensitivities differ from hCFTR, which will provide a useful tool for identifying the binding sites and mechanism for these potentiators.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
306 However, recent data indicating that VX-770 potentiates channels bearing multiple disease-causing mutations, spread across CFTR, and that VX-770 potentiates one mutant but not another one in the same domain (for example, VX-770 potentiated TM mutants T338I- and R347H- but not S341P- and E92K-CFTR and potentiated cytoplasmic loop mutants E193K- and K1060T- but not R1066M- and L1065P-CFTR) do not support this conclusion (30, 38). Login to comment