ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Ser1149Ala

Predicted by SNAP2:	A: N (57%), C: D (59%), D: D (71%), E: D (75%), F: D (85%), G: N (61%), H: D (85%), I: D (66%), K: D (75%), L: D (66%), M: D (71%), N: N (57%), P: D (80%), Q: N (53%), R: D (71%), T: N (78%), V: D (63%), W: D (91%), Y: D (85%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: N, C: N, D: N, E: N, F: N, G: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, T: N, V: N, W: N, Y: N,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Potentiation of effect of PKA stimulation of Xenop... Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004 Nov;287(5):C1436-44. Epub 2004 Jul 28. Chen Y, Button B, Altenberg GA, Reuss L
Potentiation of effect of PKA stimulation of Xenopus CFTR by activation of PKC: role of NBD2.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004 Nov;287(5):C1436-44. Epub 2004 Jul 28., [PMID:15282191]

Abstract [show]
Activity of the human (h) cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel is predominantly regulated by PKA-mediated phosphorylation. In contrast, Xenopus (X)CFTR is more responsive to PKC than PKA stimulation. We investigated the interaction between the two kinases in XCFTR. We expressed XCFTR in Xenopus oocytes and maximally stimulated it with PKA agonists. The magnitude of activation after PKC stimulation was about eightfold that without pretreatment with PKC agonist. hCFTR, expressed in the same system, lacked this response. We name this phenomenon XCFTR-specific PKC potentiation effect. To ascertain its biophysical mechanism, we first tested for XCFTR channel insertion into the plasma membrane by a substituted-cysteine-accessibility method. No insertion was detected during kinase stimulation. Next, we studied single-channel properties and found that the single-channel open probability (Po) with PKA stimulation subsequent to PKC stimulation was 2.8-fold that observed in the absence of PKC preactivation and that single-channel conductance (gamma) was increased by approximately 22%. To ascertain which XCFTR regions are responsible for the potentiation, we constructed several XCFTR-hCFTR chimeras, expressed them in Xenopus oocytes, and tested them electrophysiologically. Two chimeras [hCFTR NH2-terminal region or regulatory (R) domain in XCFTR] showed a significant decrease in potentiation. In the chimera in which XCFTR nucleotide-binding domain (NBD)2 was replaced with the hCFTR sequence there was no potentiation whatsoever. The converse chimera (hCFTR with Xenopus NBD2) did not exhibit potentiation. These results indicate that potentiation by PKC involves a large increase in Po (with a small change in gamma) without CFTR channel insertion into the plasma membrane, that XCFTR NBD2 is necessary but not sufficient for the effect, and that the potentiation effect is likely to involve other CFTR domains.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
67 A unique NheI site was introduced into the hCFTR DNA (S1149A mutation) with the mutagenic primer 5Ј-TGCAGTGGGCTGTAAACGCTAGCATAGATGT- GGATAGC-3Ј. Login to comment

[hide] Differential contribution of TM6 and TM12 to the p... Pflugers Arch. 2012 Mar;463(3):405-18. Epub 2011 Dec 13. Cui G, Song B, Turki HW, McCarty NA
Differential contribution of TM6 and TM12 to the pore of CFTR identified by three sulfonylurea-based blockers.
Pflugers Arch. 2012 Mar;463(3):405-18. Epub 2011 Dec 13., [PMID:22160394]

Abstract [show]
Previous studies suggested that four transmembrane domains 5, 6, 11, 12 make the greatest contribution to forming the pore of the CFTR chloride channel. We used excised, inside-out patches from oocytes expressing CFTR with alanine-scanning mutagenesis in amino acids in TM6 and TM12 to probe CFTR pore structure with four blockers: glibenclamide (Glyb), glipizide (Glip), tolbutamide (Tolb), and Meglitinide. Glyb and Glip blocked wildtype (WT)-CFTR in a voltage-, time-, and concentration-dependent manner. At V (M) = -120 mV with symmetrical 150 mM Cl(-) solution, fractional block of WT-CFTR by 50 muM Glyb and 200 muM Glip was 0.64 +/- 0.03 (n = 7) and 0.48 +/- 0.02 (n = 7), respectively. The major effects on block by Glyb and Glip were found with mutations at F337, S341, I344, M348, and V350 of TM6. Under similar conditions, fractional block of WT-CFTR by 300 muM Tolb was 0.40 +/- 0.04. Unlike Glyb, Glip, and Meglitinide, block by Tolb lacked time-dependence (n = 7). We then tested the effects of alanine mutations in TM12 on block by Glyb and Glip; the major effects were found at N1138, T1142, V1147, N1148, S1149, S1150, I1151, and D1152. From these experiments, we infer that amino acids F337, S341, I344, M348, and V350 of TM6 face the pore when the channel is in the open state, while the amino acids of TM12 make less important contributions to pore function. These data also suggest that the region between F337 and S341 forms the narrow part of the CFTR pore.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
150 Surprisingly, nine mutations of TM12, including N1138A, M1140A, T1142A, V1147A, N1148A, S1149A, S1150A, I1151A, and D1152A, exhibited significantly altered block by Glyb; the pattern was not consistent with either α-helix or β-strand secondary structure along the full length of the region studied. Login to comment
163 Effects on time-dependent block by mutations R334A and K335A Fractional block by Glip200 μM V1153A D1152A I1151A S1150A S1149A N1148A V1147A A1146S W1145A Q1144A L1143A T1142A S1141A M1140A I1139A N1138A M1137A A1136S L1135A T1134A WT 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 * ** ** ** ** ** ** * V1153A D1152A I1151A S1150A S1149A N1148A V1147A A1146S W1145A Q1144A L1143A T1142A S1141A M1140A I1139A N1138A M1137A A1136S L1135A T1134A WT 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 * * * * * ** ** ** ** Fractional block by Glyb50 μM Fig. 4 Alanine-scanning in TM12 to identify amino acids that interact with Glyb and Glip. Login to comment
180 Surprisingly, several mutations in TM12 Q1144A, V1147A, N1148A, S1149A, S1150A, and I1151A affected the voltage-dependence of block by Glyb (Fig. 8b). Login to comment