ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Ala46Asp

Admin's notes:	Class II (maturation defect) Veit et al.
ClinVar:	c.137C>A , p.Ala46Asp ? , not provided
CF databases:	c.137C>A , p.Ala46Asp D , CF-causing ; CFTR1: A novel missense mutation was identified by DGGE in exon 2 of the CFTR gene and confirmed by direct sequencing of assymetric PCR template and by ASO hybridization. The nucleotide change C->A at position 269 leads to mutation A46D in exon 2, which is a substitution of Alanine (GCT) for Aspartic Acid (GAT) at codon 46, (substitution of non-polar for polar aa). The above mutation was identified in 2 Greek CF chromosomes out of a total of 368 tested. Concerning the phenotype of the two patients, one is PI (621+1G->T/A46D) and the other is PS (G542X/A46D), but they both have severe pulmonary invovlement and otherwise typical clinical expression denoting that the new mutation is rather severe. c.137C>T , p.Ala46Val (CFTR1) ? ,
Predicted by SNAP2:	C: N (66%), D: D (85%), E: D (85%), F: D (75%), G: D (53%), H: D (75%), I: D (66%), K: D (80%), L: D (71%), M: D (66%), N: D (75%), P: D (80%), Q: D (75%), R: D (80%), S: N (93%), T: D (63%), V: D (53%), W: D (80%), Y: D (75%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	C: N, D: N, E: N, F: D, G: N, H: D, I: D, K: N, L: D, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: D, Y: D,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

II (maturation defect) <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823392">Veit et al.</a>
admin on 2016-08-19 15:16:22

Publications
[hide] Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR muta... Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM
Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606., [PMID:12007216]

Abstract [show]
Although there have been numerous reports from around the world of mutations in the gene of chromosome 7 known as CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), little attention has been given to integrating these mutant alleles into a global understanding of the population molecular genetics associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). We determined the distribution of CFTR mutations in as many regions throughout the world as possible in an effort designed to: 1) increase our understanding of ancestry-genotype relationships, 2) compare mutational arrays with disease incidence, and 3) gain insight for decisions regarding screening program enhancement through CFTR multi-mutational analyses. Information on all mutations that have been published since the identification and cloning of the CFTR gene's most common allele, DeltaF508 (or F508del), was reviewed and integrated into a centralized database. The data were then sorted and regional CFTR arrays were determined using mutations that appeared in a given region with a frequency of 0.5% or greater. Final analyses were based on 72,431 CF chromosomes, using data compiled from over 100 original papers, and over 80 regions from around the world, including all nations where CF has been studied using analytical molecular genetics. Initial results confirmed wide mutational heterogeneity throughout the world; however, characterization of the most common mutations across most populations was possible. We also examined CF incidence, DeltaF508 frequency, and regional mutational heterogeneity in a subset of populations. Data for these analyses were filtered for reliability and methodological strength before being incorporated into the final analysis. Statistical assessment of these variables revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between DeltaF508 frequency and the CF incidence levels of regional populations. Regional analyses were also performed to search for trends in the distribution of CFTR mutations across migrant and related populations; this led to clarification of ancestry-genotype patterns that can be used to design CFTR multi-mutation panels for CF screening programs. From comprehensive assessment of these data, we offer recommendations that multiple CFTR alleles should eventually be included to increase the sensitivity of newborn screening programs employing two-tier testing with trypsinogen and DNA analysis.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
110 Germany ∆F508 (71.8%) 1789+5G→A (0.9%) 87.6 76.7 17 5662/1316 Dörk et al. [1992]; Dörk et al. R553X (2.0%) 3272-26A→G (0.9%) [1994]; Tümmler et al. [1996]; N1303K (1.8%) W1282X (0.7%) Estivill et al. [1997]; Dörk et G542X (1.2%) 2143delT (0.7%) al. [2000] R347P (1.2%) 1078delT (0.6%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.2%) 2183AA→G (0.6%) 3849+10KbC→T (1.0%) 2184insA (0.6%) G551D (0.9% 3659delC (0.6%) 1717-1G→A (0.9%) Greece ∆F508 (52.9%) 3272-26A→G (0.8%) 82.2 67.6 22 2097/718 Kanavakis et al. [1995]; Estivill 621+1G→T (5.0%) R1070Q (0.8%) et al. [1997]; Tzetis et al. G542X (4.1%) W496X (0.7%) [1997]; Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (3.3%) 621+3A→G (0.7%) 2183AA→G (1.8%) ∆I507 (0.7%) 2789+5G→A (1.7%) W1282X (0.7%) E822X (1.6%) 574delA (0.7%) R117H (1.2%) 1677delTA (0.7%) R334W (1.1%) A46D (0.6%) R1158X (1.0%) 3120+1G→A (0.6%) G85E (1.0%) G551D (0.5%) Hungary ∆F508 (54.9%) W1282X (1.8%) 68.3 46.6 9 1133/976 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. 1717-1G→A (1.9%) G542X (1.7%) [1997]; Macek et al. [2002] R553X (2.1%) N1303K (1.3%) Y1092X (1.8%) G551D (1.0%) S1196X (1.8%) Ireland ∆F508 (70.4%) G542X (1.0%) 82.1 67.4 7 801/509 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. G551D (5.7%) 621+1G→T (0.8%) [1994] R117H (2.4%) 1717-1G→A (0.6%) R560T (1.2%) Italy ∆F508 (50.9%) ∆I507 (0.65%) 60.3 36.4 9 3524 Estivill et al. [1997] (total) G542X (3.1%) W1282X (0.62%) 1717-1G→A (1.6%) Y122K (0.59%) N1303K (1.4%) G551D (0.53%) R553X (0.94%) Italy ∆F508 (47.6%) R553X (1.3%) 87.1 75.9 15 225 Bonizzato et al. [1995] (Northeast) R1162X (9.8%) 2789+G→A (1.3%) 2183AA→G (9.3%) Q552X (1.3%) N1303K (4.0%) 621+1G→T (0.9%) G542X (2.7%) W1282X (0.9%) 711+5G→A (2.7%) 3132delTG (0.9%) 1717-1G→A (2.2%) 2790-2A→G (0.9%) G85E (1.3%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS583 Italy ∆F508 (56.4%) 711+1G→T (1.3%) 85.7 73.4 13 660/396 Castaldo et al. [1996]; Castaldo (southern) N1303K (6.8%) G1244E (1.3%) et al. [1999] G542X (5.7%) R1185X (1.3%) W1282X (3.8%) L1065P (1.3%) 1717-1G→A (2.3%) R553X (1.1%) 2183AA→G (1.9%) I148T (0.7%) 4016insT (1.8%) Latvia 1) DF508 (58.3%) 4) CFTRdele2,3 (2.8%) - - 6 36 Dörk et al. [2000]; Macek et al. 2) 3849+10KbC®T (8.3%) 5) W1282X (2.8%) [2002] 3) N1303K (5.6%) 6) 394delTT (2.8%) Lithuania ∆F508 (31.0%) N1303K (2.0%) 39.0 15.2 4 94 Dörk et al. [2000]; Macek et al. R553X (4.0%) CFTRdele2,3 (2.0%) [2002] Macedonia ∆F508 (54.3%) 711+3A→G (1.0%) 69.2 47.9 12 559/226 Petreska et al. [1998]; Dörk et G542X (4.2%) 3849G→A (1.0%) al. [2000]; Macek et al. N1303K (2.0%) 2184insA (0.9%) [2002] CFTRdele2,3 (1.3%) 457TAT→G (0.7%) 621+1G→T (1.3%) V139E (0.7%) 611-1G→T (1.2%) 1811+1G→C (0.6%) Netherlands ∆F508 (74.2%) R1162X (0.9%) 86.8 75.3 9 3167/1442 Gan et al. [1995]; Estiville et al. A455E (4.7%) S1251N (0.9%) [1997]; Collee et al. [1998] G542X (1.8%) N1303K (0.9%) 1717-1G→A (1.5%) W1282X (0.7%) R553X (1.2%) Norway ∆F508 (60.2%) G551D (1.2%) 69.8 48.7 6 410/242 Schwartz et al. [1994]; Estivill 394delTT (4.2%) G542X (0.6%) et al. [1997] R117H (3.0%) N1303K (0.6%) Poland ∆F508 (57.1%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.8%) 73.5 54.0 11 4046/1726 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. 3849+10Kb C→T (2.7%) R560T (1.5%) [1997]; Dörk et al [2000]; G542X (2.6%) W1282X (0.7%) Macek et al. [2002] 1717-1G→A (2.4%) ∆I507 (0.5%) R553X (1.9%) G551D (0.5%) N1303K (1.8%) Portugal ∆F508 (44.7%) R334W (0.7%) 49.7 24.7 5 739/454 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. G542X (1.6%) N1303K (0.7%) [1997] R1066C (2.0%) Romania ∆F508 (36.6%) G542X (1.4%) 51.5 26.5 11 224/74 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. 2043delG (2.0%) R553X (1.4%) [1997]; Popa et al. [1997]; W1282X (1.7%) G576X (1.4%) Macek et al. [2002] 1717-2A→G (1.4%) 1898+1G→A (1.4%) I148T (1.4%) 2183AA→G (1.4%) 621+1G→T (1.4%) Russia ∆F508 (54.4%) 552insA (0.9%) 70.7 50.0 12 5073/2562 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. CFTRdele2,3 (5.0%) G542X (0.9%) [1997]; Dörk et al. [2000]; R553X (3.5%) R334W (0.9%) Macek et al. [2002] 2183AA→G (1.3%) 1677delTA (0.8%) W1282X (1.0%) Y122X (0.5%) 394delTT (1.0%) 1367del5 (0.5%) (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL. Login to comment

[hide] Highest heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis: 36 muta... Am J Med Genet. 2002 Dec 1;113(3):250-7. Kilinc MO, Ninis VN, Dagli E, Demirkol M, Ozkinay F, Arikan Z, Cogulu O, Huner G, Karakoc F, Tolun A
Highest heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis: 36 mutations account for 75% of all CF chromosomes in Turkish patients.
Am J Med Genet. 2002 Dec 1;113(3):250-7., 2002-12-01 [PMID:12439892]

Abstract [show]
We analyzed the CFTR locus in 83 Turkish cystic fibrosis patients to identify mutations, haplotypes, and the carrier frequency in the population. We detected 36 different mutations in 125 (75%) of the total 166 CF chromosomes. Seven novel mutations were identified: four missense (K68E, Q493P, E608G, and V1147I), two splice-site (406 -3T > C and 3849 +5G > A), and one deletion (CFTRdele17b,18). The data showed that the Turkish population has the highest genetic heterogeneity at the CFTR locus reported so far. The results of this thorough molecular analysis at the CFTR locus of a population not of European descent shows that CF is not uncommon in all such populations. The large number of mutations present, as well as the high heterogeneity in haplotypes associated with the mutations suggests that most of the mutations have persisted for a long time in the population. Consistently, the carrier frequency is assessed to be high, indicating that the disease in the population is ancient.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
80 Haplotypes Associated With the Mutations Identified in 83 Turkish CF Patients* Mutation Total number of alleles Number of alleles Number of patients Haplotypes Homo Hetero DF508 39 (23.5) 6 7 23 M 28 13 1 0 1 6 7 23 M 30 13 1 0 1 6 9 23 M 31 13 1 0 1 6 7 23 M 31 13 11 4 3 6 7 23 M 7 17 2 0 2 6 7 16 M 31 13 3 1 1 6 7 17 M 31 13 17 5 7 6 7 17 M 32 13 3 1 1 1677delTA 12 (7.2) 7 7 16 V 30 13 12 5 2 2183AA > G 7 (4.2) 7 7 16 M 30 13 1 0 1 7 9 16 M 31 13 4 2 0 7 7 16 M 32 13 2 1 0 G542X 6 (3.6) 6 7 23 M 32 13 6 3 0 F1052V 5 (3.0) 6 7 17 M 7 13 4 1 2 7 5 17 M 7 17 1 0 1 W1282X 5 (3.0) 7 7 17 M 7 17 4 1 2 7 7 17 M 7 18 1 0 1 E92K 4 (2.4) 7 7 16 V 46 13 3 1 1 7 7 17 V 46 13 1 0 1 1525 À 1G > A 4 (2.4) 7 7 17 M 7 17 4 2 0 2789 þ 5G > A 4 (2.4) 7 9 17 M 7 17 3 1 1 7 5 17 M 7 17 1 0 1 N1303K 4 (2.4) 7 7 23 M 31 13 2 0 2 6 7 22 M 30 13 1 0 1 6 7 23 M 30 13 1 0 1 A46D 3 (1.8) 6 9 23 M 31 13 1 0 1 6 7 23 M 31 13 2 1 0 2184insA 3 (1.8) 7 5 17 V 30 13 1 0 1 7 7 16 V 30 13 2 0 2 R1070Q 3 (1.8) 7 7 16 M 31 13 1 0 1 7 7 17 M 31 13 2 0 2 Q493Pa 2 (1.2) 6/7 5 16 M 46 13 2 1 0 3849 þ 5G > Aa 2 (1.2) 7 7 16 M 31 13 2 1 0 CFTRdele17b,18a 2 (1.2) 6 9 16 V - - 2 1 0 K68Ea 1 (0.6) 6 9 17 M 7 13 1 0 1 R74W 1 (0.6) 6 7 16 M 32 16 1 0 1 306delTAGA 1 (0.6) 7 7 16 M 7 17 1 0 1 D110H 1 (0.6) 7 9 16 V 30 13 1 0 1 I125T 1 (0.6) 6 7 23 V 7 16 1 0 1 406 À 3T > Ca 1 (0.6) 7 7 16 V 33 17 1 0 1 I148T 1 (0.6) 6/7 7 16/17 M 7 17/23 1 0 1 621 þ 1G > T 1 (0.6) 6 7 21 V 31 13 1 0 1 R347P 1 (0.6) 7 9 17 V 30 13 1 0 1 S466X 1 (0.6) 7 7 23 M 33 13 1 0 1 L571S 1 (0.6) 7 7 16 V 29 13 1 0 1 1717 À 1G > A 1 (0.6) 7 9 17 M 7 16 1 0 1 E608Ga 1 (0.6) 7 9 16 M/V 29/31 13 1 0 1 2043delG 1 (0.6) 7 9 17 M 7 17 1 0 1 P1013L 1 (0.6) 6 5 16 M 21 18 1 0 1 R1066L 1 (0.6) 7 7 17 M 7 13 1 0 1 3129del4 1 (0.6) 7 7 16 V 29 13 1 0 1 V1147Ia 1 (0.6) 6 7 17 M 33 17 1 0 1 S1235R 1 (0.6) 6 7 17 M 39 13 1 0 1 CFTRdele2,3 1 (0.6) 7 7 16 V 33 13 1 0 1 Total 125 (75) 125 32 61 *The order of the polymorphisms is IVS6GATT, Tn, IVS8CA, M470V, IVS17BTA and IVS17BCA. Login to comment

[hide] Identification of two novel mutations (296 + 1G-C ... Mol Cell Probes. 1995 Aug;9(4):283-5. Tzetis M, Kanavakis E, Antoniadi T, Traeger-Synodinos J, Doudounakis S, Adam G, Kattamis C
Identification of two novel mutations (296 + 1G-C and A46D) in exon 2 of the CFTR gene in Greek cystic fibrosis patients.
Mol Cell Probes. 1995 Aug;9(4):283-5., [PMID:7477025]

Abstract [show]
Two novel CFTR mutations were detected in Greek cystic fibrosis patients. One was a missense mutation, A46D, and the other a splice mutation, 296 + 1G-C. Neither was detected on normal chromosomes.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
0 MolecularandCellularProbes(1995) 9, 283-285 Short Communication Identification of two novel mutations (296+ 1G-C and A46D) in exon 2 of the CFTR gene in Greek cystic fibrosis patients Maria Tzetis, ~ Emmanuel Kanavakis, ~ Thalia Antoniadi, 1 Joanne Traeger- Synodinos, 1 Stavros Doudounakis, 2 George Adam 2 and Christos Kattamis t* 1First Department of Pediatrics, Athens University, and 2Cystic Fibrosis Clinic, St. Sophia's Children's Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece (Received 30 March, Accepted 6 April) Two novel CFTR mutations were detected in Greek cystic fibrosis patients. Login to comment
1 One was a missense mutation, A46D, and the other a splice mutation, 296+ 1G-C. Login to comment
6 Thisapproach allowed mutationsto be identified in 75-3% of all CFalleles in our population.8 While screening our panel of Greek CF chromosomes for mutations in exon 2, we identified two novel mutations of the CFTR gene; one a missense mutation, named A46D, and the other an mRNA splicing mutation, 296 + 1G-C. Login to comment
7 A46D This novel missence mutation was found in samples of two unrelated CF patients of Greek origin (0.5% of all CF alleles). Login to comment
8 One was a compound heterozygote A46D/G542X and the other a compound heterozygote with the 621 +IG-T mutation. Login to comment
9 Sequencing data from the CF patients and their A46D carrier parent's DNA samples revealed a C-A substitution * Authorto whomcorrespondenceshouldbeaddressedat: FirstDepartmentof Pediatrics,AthensUniversity,St.Sophia'sChildren's Hospital,Athens11527, Greece. Login to comment
12 1 2 3 CFTR genotype A46D/G542X A46D/621 +IG-T 296+1G-C/ unknown Sex Female Female Male Date of birth 1983 1965 1967 Age at diagnosis 4 years 4.5 years 26 years Sweat test chloride conc. Login to comment
20 We cannot conclude anything about the severity of the A46D mutation, since one of our patients is PI and the other PS, although missense mutations located in the first transmembrane domain are usually associated with mild clinical severity and with pancreatic sufficiency. Login to comment
26 DNA sequence analysis of the novel missense mutation A46D, which is a C-A transversion at nucleotide position 269 of the coding region of exon 2. Login to comment
25 DNA sequence analysis of the novel missense mutation A46D, which is a C-A transversion at nucleotide position 269 of the coding region of exon 2. Login to comment

[hide] Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mu... J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Van Goor F, Yu H, Burton B, Hoffman BJ
Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mutations associated with defects in protein processing or function.
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 23., [PMID:23891399]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor (KALYDECO, VX-770) is a CFTR potentiator that increased CFTR channel activity and improved lung function in patients age 6 years and older with CF who have the G551D-CFTR gating mutation. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of ivacaftor on mutant CFTR protein forms with defects in protein processing and/or channel function. METHODS: The effect of ivacaftor on CFTR function was tested in electrophysiological studies using a panel of Fischer rat thyroid (FRT) cells expressing 54 missense CFTR mutations that cause defects in the amount or function of CFTR at the cell surface. RESULTS: Ivacaftor potentiated multiple mutant CFTR protein forms that produce functional CFTR at the cell surface. These included mutant CFTR forms with mild defects in CFTR processing or mild defects in CFTR channel conductance. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro data indicated that ivacaftor is a broad acting CFTR potentiator and could be used to help stratify patients with CF who have different CFTR genotypes for studies investigating the potential clinical benefit of ivacaftor.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
44 None M1V A46D E56K P67L R74W G85E E92K D110E D110H R117C R117H E193K L206W R334W I336K T338I S341P R347H R347P R352Q A455E L467P S492F F508del V520F A559T R560S R560T A561E Y569D D579G R668C L927P S945L S977F L997F F1052V H1054D K1060T L1065P R1066C R1066H R1066M A1067T R1070Q R1070W F1074L L1077P H1085R M1101K D1152H S1235R D1270N N1303K 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 * * * CFTR Mutation mRNA (% Normal CFTR) Fig. 1. Login to comment
64 Mutant CFTR form CFTR processing Mature/total % Normal CFTR Normal 0.89 &#b1; 0.01 100.0 &#b1; 18.5 G85E -0.05 &#b1; 0.04 -1.0 &#b1; 0.9 R560S 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 R1066C 0.02 &#b1; 0.01 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 S492F 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 R560T 0.01 &#b1; 0.01 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 V520F 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 M1101K 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 A561E 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 R1066M 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.4 N1303K 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.3 A559T 0.16 &#b1; 0.09 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 M1V 0.06 &#b1; 0.06 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 Y569D 0.11 &#b1; 0.04 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 R1066H 0.08 &#b1; 0.02a 0.7 &#b1; 0.2a L1065P 0.05 &#b1; 0.05 1.0 &#b1; 0.8 L467P 0.10 &#b1; 0.07 1.2 &#b1; 0.8 L1077P 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 1.5 &#b1; 0.6 A46D 0.21 &#b1; 0.08 1.9 &#b1; 0.5a E92K 0.06 &#b1; 0.05 1.9 &#b1; 1.3 H1054D 0.09 &#b1; 0.04 1.9 &#b1; 0.8 F508del 0.09 &#b1; 0.02a 2.3 &#b1; 0.5a H1085R 0.06 &#b1; 0.01a 3.0 &#b1; 0.7a I336K 0.42 &#b1; 0.05a 6.5 &#b1; 0.7a L206W 0.35 &#b1; 0.10a 6.8 &#b1; 1.7a F1074L 0.52 &#b1; 0.03a 10.9 &#b1; 0.6a A455E 0.26 &#b1; 0.10a 11.5 &#b1; 2.5a E56K 0.29 &#b1; 0.04a 12.2 &#b1; 1.5a R347P 0.48 &#b1; 0.04a 14.6 &#b1; 1.8a R1070W 0.61 &#b1; 0.04a 16.3 &#b1; 0.6a P67L 0.36 &#b1; 0.04a 28.4 &#b1; 6.8a R1070Q 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a 29.5 &#b1; 1.4a S977F 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a 37.3 &#b1; 2.4a A1067T 0.78 &#b1; 0.03a 38.6 &#b1; 6.1a D579G 0.72 &#b1; 0.02a 39.3 &#b1; 3.1a D1270N 1.00 &#b1; 0.00a,c 40.7 &#b1; 1.2a S945L 0.65 &#b1; 0.04a 42.4 &#b1; 8.9a L927P 0.89 &#b1; 0.01a,b 43.5 &#b1; 2.5a,b R117C 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 49.1 &#b1; 2.9a,b T338I 0.93 &#b1; 0.03a,b 54.2 &#b1; 3.7a,b L997F 0.90 &#b1; 0.04a,b 59.8 &#b1; 10.4a,b D110H 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a,b 60.6 &#b1; 1.5a,b S341P 0.79 &#b1; 0.02a 65.0 &#b1; 4.9a,b R668C 0.94 &#b1; 0.03a,b 68.5 &#b1; 1.9a,b R74W 0.78 &#b1; 0.01a 69.0 &#b1; 2.7a,b D110E 0.92 &#b1; 0.05a,b 87.5 &#b1; 9.5a,b R334W 0.91 &#b1; 0.05a,b 97.6 &#b1; 10.0a,b K1060T 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 109.9 &#b1; 28.0a,b R347H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 120.7 &#b1; 2.8a,b S1235R 0.96 &#b1; 0.00a,c 139.0 &#b1; 9.0a,b E193K 0.84 &#b1; 0.02a,b 143.0 &#b1; 17.1a,b R117H 0.86 &#b1; 0.01a,b 164.5 &#b1; 34.2a,b R352Q 0.98 &#b1; 0.01a,b 179.9 &#b1; 8.0a,c F1052V 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a,b 189.9 &#b1; 33.1a,b D1152H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 312.0 &#b1; 45.5a,b Notes to Table 1: Quantification of steady-state CFTR maturation expressed as the mean (&#b1;SEM; n = 5-9) ratio of mature CFTR to total CFTR (immature plus mature) or level of mature mutant CFTR relative to mature normal-CFTR (% normal CFTR) in FRT cells individually expressing CFTR mutations. Login to comment
74 Because the level of CFTR mRNA was similar across the panel of cell lines tested, the range in baseline activity and ivacaftor response likely reflects the severity of the functional defect and/or the 0 50 100 150 200 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L E56K P67L R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V Baseline With ivacaftor * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chloride transport (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form 0 100 200 300 400 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L P67L E56K R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mature CFTR (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form A B Fig. 2. Login to comment
82 Mutation Patientsa Chloride transport (bc;A/cm2 ) Chloride transport (% normal) EC50 Baseline With ivacaftor Baseline With ivacaftor Fold increase over baselineb Normal 204.5 &#b1; 33.3 301.3 &#b1; 33.8c 100.0 &#b1; 16.3 147.3 &#b1; 16.5c 1.5 266 &#b1; 42 G551D 1282 1.5 &#b1; 0.7 113.2 &#b1; 13.0c 1.0 &#b1; 0.5 55.3 &#b1; 6.3c 55.3 312 &#b1; 73 F1052V 12 177.3 &#b1; 13.7 410.2 &#b1; 11.3c 86.7 &#b1; 6.7 200.7 &#b1; 5.6c 2.3 177 &#b1; 14 S1235R ND 160.6 &#b1; 25.7 352.1 &#b1; 43.4c 78.5 &#b1; 12.6 172.2 &#b1; 21.2c 2.2 282 &#b1; 104 D1152H 185 117.3 &#b1; 23.0 282.7 &#b1; 46.9c 57.4 &#b1; 11.2 138.2 &#b1; 22.9c 2.4 178 &#b1; 67 D1270N 32 109.5 &#b1; 20.5 209.5 &#b1; 27.4c 53.6 &#b1; 10.0 102.4 &#b1; 13.4c 1.9 254 &#b1; 56 R668C 45 99.0 &#b1; 9.4 217.6 &#b1; 11.7c 48.4 &#b1; 4.6 106.4 &#b1; 5.7c 2.2 517 &#b1; 105 K1060T ND 89.0 &#b1; 9.8 236.4 &#b1; 20.3c 43.5 &#b1; 4.8 115.6 &#b1; 9.9c 2.7 131 &#b1; 73 R74W 25 86.8 &#b1; 26.9 199.1 &#b1; 16.8c 42.5 &#b1; 13.2 97.3 &#b1; 8.2c 2.3 162 &#b1; 17 R117H 739 67.2 &#b1; 13.3 274.1 &#b1; 32.2c 32.9 &#b1; 6.5 134.0 &#b1; 15.7c 4.1 151 &#b1; 14 E193K ND 62.2 &#b1; 9.8 379.1 &#b1; 1.1c 30.4 &#b1; 4.8 185.4 &#b1; 1.0c 6.1 240 &#b1; 20 A1067T ND 55.9 &#b1; 3.2 164.0 &#b1; 9.7c 27.3 &#b1; 1.6 80.2 &#b1; 4.7c 2.9 317 &#b1; 214 L997F 27 43.7 &#b1; 3.2 145.5 &#b1; 4.0c 21.4 &#b1; 1.6 71.2 &#b1; 2.0c 3.3 162 &#b1; 12 R1070Q 15 42.0 &#b1; 0.8 67.3 &#b1; 2.9c 20.6 &#b1; 0.4 32.9 &#b1; 1.4c 1.6 164 &#b1; 20 D110E ND 23.3 &#b1; 4.7 96.4 &#b1; 15.6c 11.4 &#b1; 2.3 47.1 &#b1; 7.6c 4.1 213 &#b1; 51 D579G 21 21.5 &#b1; 4.1 192.0 &#b1; 18.5c 10.5 &#b1; 2.0 93.9 &#b1; 9.0c 8.9 239 &#b1; 48 D110H 30 18.5 &#b1; 2.2 116.7 &#b1; 11.3c 9.1 &#b1; 1.1 57.1 &#b1; 5.5c 6.2 249 &#b1; 59 R1070W 13 16.6 &#b1; 2.6 102.1 &#b1; 3.1c 8.1 &#b1; 1.3 49.9 &#b1; 1.5c 6.2 158 &#b1; 48 P67L 53 16.0 &#b1; 6.7 88.7 &#b1; 15.7c 7.8 &#b1; 3.3 43.4 &#b1; 7.7c 5.6 195 &#b1; 40 E56K ND 15.8 &#b1; 3.1 63.6 &#b1; 4.4c 7.7 &#b1; 1.5 31.1 &#b1; 2.2c 4.0 123 &#b1; 33 F1074L ND 14.0 &#b1; 3.4 43.5 &#b1; 5.4c 6.9 &#b1; 1.6 21.3 &#b1; 2.6c 3.1 141 &#b1; 19 A455E 120 12.9 &#b1; 2.6 36.4 &#b1; 2.5c 6.3 &#b1; 1.2 17.8 &#b1; 1.2c 2.8 170 &#b1; 44 S945L 63 12.3 &#b1; 3.9 154.9 &#b1; 47.6c 6.0 &#b1; 1.9 75.8 &#b1; 23.3c 12.6 181 &#b1; 36 S977F 9 11.3 &#b1; 6.2 42.5 &#b1; 19.1c 5.5 &#b1; 3.0 20.8 &#b1; 9.3c 3.8 283 &#b1; 36 R347H 65 10.9 &#b1; 3.3 106.3 &#b1; 7.6c 5.3 &#b1; 1.6 52.0 &#b1; 3.7c 9.8 280 &#b1; 35 L206W 81 10.3 &#b1; 1.7 36.4 &#b1; 2.8c 5.0 &#b1; 0.8 17.8 &#b1; 1.4c 3.6 101 &#b1; 13 R117C 61 5.8 &#b1; 1.5 33.7 &#b1; 7.8c 2.9 &#b1; 0.7 16.5 &#b1; 3.8c 5.7 380 &#b1; 136 R352Q 46 5.5 &#b1; 1.0 84.5 &#b1; 7.8c 2.7 &#b1; 0.5 41.3 &#b1; 3.8c 15.2 287 &#b1; 75 R1066H 29 3.0 &#b1; 0.3 8.0 &#b1; 0.8c 1.5 &#b1; 0.1 3.9 &#b1; 0.4c 2.6 390 &#b1; 179 T338I 54 2.9 &#b1; 0.8 16.1 &#b1; 2.4c 1.4 &#b1; 0.4 7.9 &#b1; 1.2c 5.6 334 &#b1; 38 R334W 150 2.6 &#b1; 0.5 10.0 &#b1; 1.4c 1.3 &#b1; 0.2 4.9 &#b1; 0.7c 3.8 259 &#b1; 103 G85E 262 1.6 &#b1; 1.0 1.5 &#b1; 1.2 0.8 &#b1; 0.5 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS A46D ND 2.0 &#b1; 0.6 1.1 &#b1; 1.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS I336K 29 1.8 &#b1; 0.2 7.4 &#b1; 0.1c 0.9 &#b1; 0.1 3.6 &#b1; 0.1c 4 735 &#b1; 204 H1054D ND 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 8.7 &#b1; 0.3c 0.8 &#b1; 0.1 4.2 &#b1; 0.1c 5.3 187 &#b1; 20 F508del 29,018 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 12.1 &#b1; 1.7c 0.4 &#b1; 0.3 5.9 &#b1; 0.8c 14.8 129 &#b1; 38 M1V 9 0.7 &#b1; 1.4 6.5 &#b1; 1.9c 0.4 &#b1; 0.7 3.2 &#b1; 0.9c 8.0 183 &#b1; 85 E92K 14 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 4.3 &#b1; 0.8c 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 2.1 &#b1; 0.4c 7.0 198 &#b1; 46 V520F 58 0.4 &#b1; 0.2 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS H1085R ND 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 2.1 &#b1; 0.4 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS R560T 180 0.3 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.5 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS L927P 15 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 10.7 &#b1; 1.7c 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 5.2 &#b1; 0.8c 52.0 313 &#b1; 66 R560S ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 -0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 -0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS N1303K 1161 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS M1101K 79 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1077P 42 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066M ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066C 100 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1065P 25 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS Y569D 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS A561E ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS A559T 43 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S492F 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 1.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS L467P 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R347P 214 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S341P 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS a Number of individuals with the individual mutation in the CFTR-2 database (www.CFTR2.org). Login to comment

[hide] Should diffuse bronchiectasis still be considered ... J Cyst Fibros. 2015 Sep;14(5):646-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 18. Bergougnoux A, Viart V, Miro J, Bommart S, Molinari N, des Georges M, Claustres M, Chiron R, Taulan-Cadars M
Should diffuse bronchiectasis still be considered a CFTR-related disorder?
J Cyst Fibros. 2015 Sep;14(5):646-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 18., [PMID:25797027]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Although several comprehensive studies have evaluated the role of the CFTR gene in idiopathic diffuse bronchiectasis (DB), it remains controversial. METHODS: We analyzed the whole coding region of the CFTR gene, its flanking regions and the promoter in 47 DB patients and 47 controls. Available information about demographic, spirometric, radiological and microbiological data for the DB patients was collected. Unclassified CFTR variants were in vitro functionally assessed. RESULTS: CFTR variants were identified in 24 DB patients and in 27 controls. DB variants were reclassified based on the results of in silico predictive analyses, in vitro functional assays and data from epidemiological and literature databases. Except for the sweat test value, no clear genotype-phenotype correlation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: DB should not be considered a classical autosomal recessive CFTR-RD. Moreover, although further investigations are necessary, we proposed a new class of "Non-Neutral Variants" whose impact on lung disease requires more studies.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
73 Sequence variation Allelic frequency Distribution cDNA name Protein name Legacy name rs number DB group (n = 94) Control group (n = 94) General populationa CF groupb Databasesc Our study c.-1043dupT - -912dupT no rs 0.01 0 NA 0 (n1) UV NNV c.-966 T N G - -834 T N G rs4148682 0.051 0.0319 0.043-0.562 (19 studies) 0.02 (n1) P P c.-812 T N G - -680 T N G rs181008242 0.01 0 NA 0.015 (n1) UV NNV c.137C N A p.Ala46Asp A46D rs151020603 0.01 0 NA 0.00015 (n2) CF CF c.224G N A p.Arg75Gln R75Q rs1800076 0.021 0.018 0-0.11 (7 studies) 0 (n1) P NNV c.350G N A p.Arg117His R117H rs78655421 0.01 0 0-0.002-0.004 (3 studies) 0.003 (n2) 0.005 (n3) M M c.489 + 23C N G p. Login to comment
88 Three alterations were well-known CF mutations: p.Phe508del was found in two patients, whereas p.Ile507del and p.Ala46Asp were each detected in only one patient. Login to comment
129 Two known CF mutations were used as controls: p.Ala46Asp and p.Gly551Asp. Login to comment
152 Similar results were obtained for the p.Ala46Asp variant. Login to comment