ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Asp110Glu

Admin's notes:	Class III (gating defect) Veit et al.
ClinVar:	c.328G>C , p.Asp110His D , Pathogenic c.328G>T , p.Asp110Tyr ? , not provided c.330C>A , p.Asp110Glu ? , not provided
CF databases:	c.328G>C , p.Asp110His D , CF-causing ; CFTR1: c.330C>A , p.Asp110Glu (CFTR1) ? , This mutation was detected by DGGE analysis followed by direct sequencing in two CF infants, a girl carrying [delta]F508 in the other chromosome and a boy carrying G542X in the other chromosome, both of Southern Italian origin (Sicilia region). It was never found in other 800 Italian CF chromosomes and in 100 control chromosomes from Italian population. The girl was diagnosed because of positive neonatal screening (persistent neonatal hypertrypsinemia), sweat chloride was 42, 57, and 68 mEq/l on repeated tests. Delayed meconium emission. No respiratory symptoms, pancreatic sufficiency and normal growth at 6 months. The boy presented at 6 months because of metabolic alkalemic diselectrolitemia and bronchiolitis. Neonatal screening was negative. Sweat chloride was 80, 70, 59 and 88 mEq/l on repeated occasions. At 2.5yrs, he is pancreatic sufficient, his growth is in the normal range and he presents no respiratory problems. This mutation was also reported by Aquino et al. (22/02/2000): It abolishes a Scrf I site. This substitution involves a quite conserved residue among species (N110 in the squale), in an intracellular loop. It doesn't affect the charge of the CFTR protein. It was found in an Italian CF patient with pancreatic sufficiency and bearing [delta]F508 on the other chromosome. No other mutation was found after analysis of 14 exons. The deleterious effect of D110E remains to be demonstrated. c.328G>T , p.Asp110Tyr (CFTR1) D , This mutation was found by SSCA and direct DNA sequencing in a CBAVD patient. (reported in Human Reproduction (2000) 15, 1476-1483). c.328G>A , p.Asp110Asn (CFTR1) ? ,
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (91%), C: D (91%), E: D (85%), F: D (95%), G: D (95%), H: D (63%), I: D (95%), K: D (95%), L: D (95%), M: D (95%), N: D (85%), P: D (95%), Q: D (95%), R: D (95%), S: D (85%), T: D (95%), V: D (95%), W: D (95%), Y: D (95%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: N, C: D, E: N, F: N, G: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: D, Q: N, R: N, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: D, Y: N,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

III (gating defect) <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823392">Veit et al.</a>
admin on 2016-08-19 15:16:22

Publications
[hide] Genetic and clinical features of false-negative in... Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(1):82-7. Padoan R, Genoni S, Moretti E, Seia M, Giunta A, Corbetta C
Genetic and clinical features of false-negative infants in a neonatal screening programme for cystic fibrosis.
Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(1):82-7., [PMID:11883825]

Abstract [show]
A study was performed on the delayed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) in infants who had false-negative results in a neonatal screening programme. The genetic and clinical features of false-negative infants in this screening programme were assessed together with the efficiency of the screening procedure in the Lombardia region. In total, 774,687 newborns were screened using a two-step immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) (in the years 1990-1992), IRT/IRT + delF508 (1993-1998) or IRT/IRT + polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA) protocol (1998-1999). Out of 196 CF children born in the 10 y period 15 were false negative on screening (7.6%) and molecular analysis showed a high variability in the genotypes. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene mutations identified were delF508, D1152H, R1066C, R334W, G542X, N1303K, F1052V, A120T, 3849 + 10kbC --> T, 2789 + 5G --> A, 5T-12TG and the novel mutation D110E. In three patients no mutation was identified after denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of the majority of CFTR gene exons. Conclusion: The clinical phenotypes of CF children diagnosed by their symptoms at different ages were very mild. None of them presented with a severe lung disease. The majority of them did not seem to have been damaged by the delayed diagnosis. The combination of IRT assay plus genotype analysis (1998-1999) appears to be a more reliable method of detecting CF than IRT measurement alone or combined with only the delF508 mutation.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
8 The cystic brosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene mutations identi ed were delF508, D1152H, R1066C, R334W, G542X, N1303K, F1052V, A120T, 3849 ‡ 10kbC ® T, 2789 ‡ 5G ® A, 5T-12TG and the novel mutation D110E. Login to comment
40 Mutation Frequency (%) DelF508 54 N1303K 8 G542X 6.25 1717-1G ® A 2.50 R334W 1.75 2183AA ® G 1.50 R117H, L1077P, W1282X 1.25 D110E, R347P, E585X, 2789 ‡ 5G ® A 0.75 R352Q, R553X, R1066H, D1152H, R1158X, 1782delA, 1898 ‡ 1G ® A, 3659delC 0.50 G85E, R117L, G178R, D579G, H609R, Y1032C, V1153E, R1162X, 621 ‡ 1G ® T, 711 ‡ 1G ® T, 1845delAG o 1846delGA, 2143delT 0.25 Table2.Differencesinthethreestrategiesofneonatalscreening(audit1990-1999). Login to comment
70 Year of birth Patient Sex Age at diagnosis Genotype Sweat test (chloride mEq l¡1 ) 1990 1 BA F 8 mo DF508/2789 ‡ 5G ® A 74, 79 2 LG M 4 y ¡/¡ 84, 83 1991 3 BV F 6 y ¡/¡ a 61, 85, 70 4 CA F 8 y R1066C/D1152H 58, 59 5 CA F 8 y DF508/5T-TG12 65, 67 6 PS M 5 y N1303K/-a 41, 43, 55, 63, 85, 89 1992 7 AE F 1 y R334W/-a 57, 42, 78, 82 8 DA M 4 mo ¡/¡ 85, 101, 143, 9 FA M 1 y ¡/¡ a 70, 75, 98, 114 1993 10 CA F 7 y DF508/5T-TG12 45, 50 1995 11 BM M 3 y DF508/DF508 117, 123 1997 12 DG M 6 mo G542X/D110E 59, 88, 80, 70 13 DE F 2 y D1152H/3849 ‡ 10kbC ® T 31, 35 14 TL M 2 y ¡/¡ a 115, 136 1998 15 CM M 5 mo F1052V/A120T 20, 25 F: female; M: male. Login to comment
80 The CFTR alterations identi ed were D1152H, R1066C, R334W, G542X, N1303K, F1052V, A120T, 3849 ‡ 10kbC ® T, 2789 ‡ 5G ® A, 5T-12TG and the new mutation D110E (19). Login to comment

[hide] Screening for cystic fibrosis in newborn infants: ... J Med Screen. 2002;9(2):60-3. Corbetta C, Seia M, Bassotti A, Ambrosioni A, Giunta A, Padoan R
Screening for cystic fibrosis in newborn infants: results of a pilot programme based on a two tier protocol (IRT/DNA/IRT) in the Italian population.
J Med Screen. 2002;9(2):60-3., [PMID:12133923]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a two tier neonatal screening programme (IRT/DNA/IRT) for cystic fibrosis, based on immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) followed by direct cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene analysis (based on a panel of up to 31 mutations) in hypertrypsinaemic newborn infants and to compare it with a previous screening protocol. SETTING: The study comprised all the newborn infants in the period 1 October 1998 to 31 December 1999 in the Lombardia region, north western Italy. METHODS: The screening strategy consisted of an immunoreactive trypsinogen assay from dried blood spots, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by an oligonucleotide ligation assay (PCR-OLA), and a sequence code separation. RESULTS: 104 609 newborn infants were screened. 1457 hypertrypsinaemic infants (1.39%) were analysed with the PCR-OLA assay. 18 newborn homozygotes or compound heterozygotes for CFTR mutations were identified and referred to the cystic fibrosis (CF) centre at a mean age of 3 weeks. 125 infants presenting only one mutation were recalled for a sweat test: a diagnosis of CF was made in 13 infants, and parents of 112 neonates identified as carriers (1:13) received genetic counselling. The remaining 1314 hypertrypsinaemic newborn infants were recalled for IRT retesting and 177 were referred for a sweat test because the second IRT measurement was above the cut off value. Among this group a further two infants were diagnosed with CF (1.1%) leading to a CF prevalence of 1:3170. CONCLUSIONS: This strategy resulted in an early and accurate diagnosis of CF. The IRT/DNA/IRT protocol with an OLA assay was shown to be useful in an Italian population with a genetic heterogeneity, leading to the identification of 94% of infants with CF.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
306 The first had only one CFTR mutated allele (711+3A→G), the second, a girl of Tunisian origin, was homozygous for a novel mutation (D110E).22 The observed carrier frequency was 1:13 hypertrypsinaemic newborn infants, whereas in the previous period 1:24 hypertrypsinaemic infants were detected as delF508 carriers. Login to comment

[hide] Atypical cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related diseases... Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008 Dec;35(3):116-23. Paranjape SM, Zeitlin PL
Atypical cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related diseases.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008 Dec;35(3):116-23., [PMID:18493878]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF), which is among the most common life-shortening recessive illnesses, is caused by mutations of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and typically involves chronic infection and progressive obstruction of the respiratory tract as well as pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Disease severity, to some extent, correlates with organ sensitivity to CFTR dysfunction and to the amount of functional protein, which is influenced by the type of mutation. Atypical CF represents approximately 2% of affected individuals, and includes cases presenting in adolescence or adulthood with pancreatic exocrine sufficiency, normal or borderline sweat chloride concentrations, or with a single predominant clinical feature. This review briefly describes diagnostic methods and phenotypic characteristics of classic and atypical CF, as well as CFTR-related diseases, conditions in which mutated CFTR may contribute to the pathogenesis but do not strictly fit established diagnostic criteria.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
64 Determination of the transepithelial nasal potential difference has been beneficial in establishing a CF Table 1 Mutations, sites, and molecular consequences associated with either an atypical presentation of CF respiratory disease or pancreatic sufficiency or late-onset pancreatic insufficiency (http:// www.genet.sickkids.on.ca) Mutation Site Consequence Atypical presentation M1210I Exon 19 Met to Ile at 1210 S1455X Exon 24 Ser to Stop at 1455 1811+18G→A Intron 11 mRNA splicing defect L346P Exon 7 Leu to Pro at 346 Y161D Exon 4 Tyr to Asp at 161 R31C Exon 2 Arg to Cys at 31 I752S Exon 13 Ile to Ser at 752 2811G/T Exon 15 Sequence variation Pancreatic sufficiency or late-onset pancreatic insufficiency R600G Exon 13 Arg to Gly at 600 D1152H Exon 18 Asp to His at 1152 Y89C Exon 3 Tyr to Cys at 89 R117H Exon 4 Arg to His at 117 D110E Exon 4 Asp to Glu at 110 296 + 3insT Intron 2 mRNA splicing defect E217G Exon 6a Glu to Gly at 217 V392G Exon 8 Val to Gly at 392 N1088D Exon 17b Asn to Asp at 1088 S737F Exon 13 Missense 1716+1G→A Intron 10 mRNA splicing defect R334W Exon 7 Arg to Trp at 334 R347P Exon 7 Arg to Pro at 347 A455E Exon 9 Ala to Glu at 455 P574H Exon 12 Pro to His at 574 3850-3T→G Intron 19 mRNA splicing defect diagnosis in many atypical cases. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical phenotype and genotype of children with b... Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct 1;182(7):929-36. Epub 2010 Jun 10. Sermet-Gaudelus I, Girodon E, Sands D, Stremmler N, Vavrova V, Deneuville E, Reix P, Bui S, Huet F, Lebourgeois M, Munck A, Iron A, Skalicka V, Bienvenu T, Roussel D, Lenoir G, Bellon G, Sarles J, Macek M, Roussey M, Fajac I, Edelman A
Clinical phenotype and genotype of children with borderline sweat test and abnormal nasal epithelial chloride transport.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct 1;182(7):929-36. Epub 2010 Jun 10., 2010-10-01 [PMID:20538955]

Abstract [show]
RATIONALE: The diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) is based on a characteristic clinical picture in association with a sweat chloride (Cl(-)) concentration greater than 60 mmol/L or the identification of two CF-causing mutations. A challenging problem is the significant number of children for whom no definitive diagnosis is possible because they present with symptoms suggestive of CF, a sweat chloride level in the intermediate range between 30 and 60 mmol/L, and only one or no identified CF-causing mutation. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein in the airways of children with intermediate sweat tests and inconclusive genetic findings in correlation with clinical phenotype and genotype. METHODS: We developed a composite nasal potential difference (NPD) diagnostic score to discriminate patients with CF from non-CF patients. We tested NPD in 50 children (age, 6 mo to 18 yr) with equivocal diagnoses and correlated the NPD diagnostic score with clinical phenotypes and genotypes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen of the 50 children had NPD scores in the CF range. Eight of the 15 carried two CFTR mutations compared with only 5 of the 35 children with normal NPD scores (P = 0.01). They were significantly younger at evaluation and had recurrent lower respiratory tract infections, chronic productive coughs, and chronic Staphylococcus aureus colonization significantly more often than the 35 children with normal NPD results. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of CFTR function in the nasal epithelium of children with inconclusive CF diagnoses can be a useful diagnostic tool and help clinicians to individualize therapeutic strategy.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
162 CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CHILDREN WITH EQUIVOCAL DIAGNOSES AND NASAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE DIAGNOSTIC SCORE <0.27 Pt Mutation Age (yr) NPD Score Sweat Cl2 Chronic CF Pulmonary Disease CF Pathogens Airway Obstruction CF Lung Imaging FEV1 (%) BMI Others 1 F508del/S977F A-D 8 0.181 43 RLRTI, chronic productive cough S. aureus No Bronchiectasis 80 14.5 No Bronchial thickening Atelectasis 2 0/0 4 0.121 43 No S. aureus Yes Air trapping NA 13 Pancreatic extracts 0-0 Bronchial thickening 3 0/0 15 20.032 46 RLRTI S. aureus, P. aeruginosa Yes Air trapping 74 14 Polyposis 0-0 Bronchiectasis 4 F508del/0 2 20.249 57 RLRTI P. aeruginosa Yes Air trapping NA 16 No A-0 5 N1303K/(TG12)T5 11.8 20.263 47 RLRTI S. aureus, P. aeruginosa No Bronchial thickening ND 20 No A-B 6 F508del/L206W 5.9 20.278 40 RLRTI S. aureus No Bronchial thickening 115 22 Chronic pancreatitis A-AB 7 R668C/0 15 20.403 40 RLRTI None Yes Bronchiectasis 112 20 No B-0 Air trapping 8 F508del/L997F A-B 1 20.594 38 RLRTI, chronic productive cough P. aeruginosa No Bronchial thickening NA 16 CF hepatopathy 9 G576A;R668C/S1235R 8 20.659 31 0 None Wheezing Normal 100 20 No B-B 10 G542X/0 5 20.718 49 RLRTI, chronic productive cough S. aureus No Bronchial thickening NA 18 No A-0 11 0/0 7 20.742 37 RLRTI None No Normal 106 18 No 0-0 12 F508del/D110E 16 20.777 50 No S. aureus No No 100 21 No A-AB 13 F508del/R1070W 7 21.006 40 RLRTI S. aureus Wheezing Bronchial thickening 110 14 No A-AB 14 F508del-L467F/0 12 21.897 55 RLRTI, chronic productive cough S. aureus No Bronchiectasis 109 17 Pansinusitis A-0 15 F508del/H1054D 9 22.327 59 RLRTI, chronic productive cough S. aureus No Bronchial thickening 100 20 DIOS A-D Definition of abbreviations: A, B, AB, and D: A 5 CF-causing mutation; B 5 mutation that results in a CFTR-RD (clinical entities associated with CFTR mutations that do not meet the current diagnostic criteria for CF); AB 5 wide-spectrum mutation that may belong to either group A or group B; D 5 mutation of uncertain clinical relevance; BMI 5 body mass index; CF 5 cystic fibrosis; CFTR 5 gene encoding cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; DIOS 5 distal intestinal obstructive syndrome; NA 5 not applicable; ND 5 not determined; NPD 5 nasal potential difference; P. aeruginosa 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pt 5 patient; RLRTI 5 recurrent lower respiratory tract infection; S. aureus 5 Staphylococcus aureus. Login to comment

[hide] Naturally occurring mutations in the canine CFTR g... Physiol Genomics. 2010 Aug;42(3):480-5. Epub 2010 Jun 22. Spadafora D, Hawkins EC, Murphy KE, Clark LA, Ballard ST
Naturally occurring mutations in the canine CFTR gene.
Physiol Genomics. 2010 Aug;42(3):480-5. Epub 2010 Jun 22., [PMID:20571109]

Abstract [show]
Naturally occurring cystic fibrosis (CF)-causing mutations in the CFTR gene have not been identified in any nonhuman animal species. Since domestic dogs are known to develop medical conditions associated with atypical CF in humans (e.g., bronchiectasis and pancreatitis), we hypothesized that dogs with these disorders likely have a higher expression rate of CFTR mutations than the at-large population. Temporal temperature-gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE) was used to screen canine CFTR in 400 animals: 203 dogs diagnosed with pancreatitis, 23 dogs diagnosed with bronchiectasis, and 174 dogs admitted to clinics for any illness (at-large dogs). Twenty-eight dogs were identified with one of four CFTR missense mutations. P1281T and P1464H mutations occur in relatively unconserved residues. R1456W is analogous to the human R1453W mutation, which has approximately 20% of normal CFTR function and is associated with pancreatitis and panbronchiolitis. R812W disrupts a highly conserved protein kinase A recognition site within the regulatory domain. We conclude that naturally occurring CFTR mutations are relatively common in domestic dogs and can be detected with TTGE. No substantive differences in mutation frequency were observed between the at-large, pancreatitis, and bronchiectasis dogs.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
148 Nonetheless, a human patient who expressed the S813P mutation with the D110E mutation was reported to have mild CF and the R810G mutation and severe loss of function mutation F508del were present in a patient with CBAVD (7). Login to comment
147 Nonetheless, a human patient who expressed the S813P mutation with the D110E mutation was reported to have mild CF and the R810G mutation and severe loss of function mutation F508del were present in a patient with CBAVD (7). Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis genetic counseling difficulties du... J Cyst Fibros. 2012 Jul;11(4):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Feb 11. Poulou M, Fylaktou I, Fotoulaki M, Kanavakis E, Tzetis M
Cystic fibrosis genetic counseling difficulties due to the identification of novel mutations in the CFTR gene.
J Cyst Fibros. 2012 Jul;11(4):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Feb 11., [PMID:22326559]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: The Cystic Fibrosis database includes amongst the 1893 gene mutations and polymorphisms a lot of missense mutations, the disease status of which still remains unproven. In populations with high rates of CFTR mutation heterogeneity, molecular diagnosis is difficult often causing counseling difficulties especially in cases of rare and/or novel mutations. METHODS: Approaches to counseling in cases of novel variants. RESULTS: Thirty-seven novel variants (4 synonymous, 24 missense, 2 frameshift and 10 intronic substitutions) were identified and evaluated with the help of in silico tools. CONCLUSIONS: In a diagnostic environment the answers have to be given within a specific timeframe, the in silico tools in combination with the phenotype offer some help but their diagnostic value is limited and cannot be used in isolation for the determination of the severity of the mutation.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
66 (6) Disease causing Screening 24 22 (19) c.3627ANC p.Gln1209His p.Asp110Glu (in cis) and p.Ser737Phe (in trans) Benign NT 0.02 Path. (5) Disease causing Metabolic alkalosis 25 int14 (13) c.2490+3ANG N/A N/A N/A Polymorphism Screening 26 Int17 (15) c.2909-36TNC N/A N/A N/A Polymorphism Screening 27 int17 (15) c.2909-10TNC N/A N/A N/A Polymorphism Screening 28 int25 (22) c.4137-21GNT N/A N/A N/A Polymorphism Screening 29 int8 (7) c.1116+4ANT N/A N/A N/A Disease causing Screening 30 int18 (16) c.2988+30TNC N/A N/A N/A Polymorphism Screening 31 int12 (11) c.1680-27GNA N/A N/A N/A Polymorphism Screening 32 int15 (14a) c.2620-24CNG N/A N/A N/A Polymorphism Ech. Bowel 33 int15 (14a) c.2620-18delT N/A N/A N/A Polymorphism Screening 34 c.2790-8CNG N/A N/A N/A Obstr. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis presenting as metabolic alkalosis ... J Cyst Fibros. 2004 Jun;3(2):135-6. Salvatore D, Tomaiuolo R, Abate R, Vanacore B, Manieri S, Mirauda MP, Scavone A, Schiavo MV, Castaldo G, Salvatore F
Cystic fibrosis presenting as metabolic alkalosis in a boy with the rare D579G mutation.
J Cyst Fibros. 2004 Jun;3(2):135-6., [PMID:15463898]

Abstract [show]
We report on a 10-month-old boy with hypotonic dehydration and metabolic alkalosis. Sweat test was borderline and genetic analysis was negative for common mutations. Analysis of the whole coding regions of the CFTR gene revealed the rare mutation D579G in homozygosity.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
17 Indeed, there are several reports about a mild CF phenotype of isolated hypotonic dehydration, associated with specific CFTR mutations, such as T338I, D110E and D110H [6-8]. Login to comment

[hide] Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mu... J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Van Goor F, Yu H, Burton B, Hoffman BJ
Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mutations associated with defects in protein processing or function.
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 23., [PMID:23891399]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor (KALYDECO, VX-770) is a CFTR potentiator that increased CFTR channel activity and improved lung function in patients age 6 years and older with CF who have the G551D-CFTR gating mutation. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of ivacaftor on mutant CFTR protein forms with defects in protein processing and/or channel function. METHODS: The effect of ivacaftor on CFTR function was tested in electrophysiological studies using a panel of Fischer rat thyroid (FRT) cells expressing 54 missense CFTR mutations that cause defects in the amount or function of CFTR at the cell surface. RESULTS: Ivacaftor potentiated multiple mutant CFTR protein forms that produce functional CFTR at the cell surface. These included mutant CFTR forms with mild defects in CFTR processing or mild defects in CFTR channel conductance. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro data indicated that ivacaftor is a broad acting CFTR potentiator and could be used to help stratify patients with CF who have different CFTR genotypes for studies investigating the potential clinical benefit of ivacaftor.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
44 None M1V A46D E56K P67L R74W G85E E92K D110E D110H R117C R117H E193K L206W R334W I336K T338I S341P R347H R347P R352Q A455E L467P S492F F508del V520F A559T R560S R560T A561E Y569D D579G R668C L927P S945L S977F L997F F1052V H1054D K1060T L1065P R1066C R1066H R1066M A1067T R1070Q R1070W F1074L L1077P H1085R M1101K D1152H S1235R D1270N N1303K 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 * * * CFTR Mutation mRNA (% Normal CFTR) Fig. 1. Login to comment
64 Mutant CFTR form CFTR processing Mature/total % Normal CFTR Normal 0.89 &#b1; 0.01 100.0 &#b1; 18.5 G85E -0.05 &#b1; 0.04 -1.0 &#b1; 0.9 R560S 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 R1066C 0.02 &#b1; 0.01 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 S492F 0.00 &#b1; 0.00 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 R560T 0.01 &#b1; 0.01 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 V520F 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 M1101K 0.05 &#b1; 0.03 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 A561E 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 R1066M 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.4 N1303K 0.02 &#b1; 0.02 0.5 &#b1; 0.3 A559T 0.16 &#b1; 0.09 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 M1V 0.06 &#b1; 0.06 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 Y569D 0.11 &#b1; 0.04 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 R1066H 0.08 &#b1; 0.02a 0.7 &#b1; 0.2a L1065P 0.05 &#b1; 0.05 1.0 &#b1; 0.8 L467P 0.10 &#b1; 0.07 1.2 &#b1; 0.8 L1077P 0.08 &#b1; 0.04 1.5 &#b1; 0.6 A46D 0.21 &#b1; 0.08 1.9 &#b1; 0.5a E92K 0.06 &#b1; 0.05 1.9 &#b1; 1.3 H1054D 0.09 &#b1; 0.04 1.9 &#b1; 0.8 F508del 0.09 &#b1; 0.02a 2.3 &#b1; 0.5a H1085R 0.06 &#b1; 0.01a 3.0 &#b1; 0.7a I336K 0.42 &#b1; 0.05a 6.5 &#b1; 0.7a L206W 0.35 &#b1; 0.10a 6.8 &#b1; 1.7a F1074L 0.52 &#b1; 0.03a 10.9 &#b1; 0.6a A455E 0.26 &#b1; 0.10a 11.5 &#b1; 2.5a E56K 0.29 &#b1; 0.04a 12.2 &#b1; 1.5a R347P 0.48 &#b1; 0.04a 14.6 &#b1; 1.8a R1070W 0.61 &#b1; 0.04a 16.3 &#b1; 0.6a P67L 0.36 &#b1; 0.04a 28.4 &#b1; 6.8a R1070Q 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a 29.5 &#b1; 1.4a S977F 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a 37.3 &#b1; 2.4a A1067T 0.78 &#b1; 0.03a 38.6 &#b1; 6.1a D579G 0.72 &#b1; 0.02a 39.3 &#b1; 3.1a D1270N 1.00 &#b1; 0.00a,c 40.7 &#b1; 1.2a S945L 0.65 &#b1; 0.04a 42.4 &#b1; 8.9a L927P 0.89 &#b1; 0.01a,b 43.5 &#b1; 2.5a,b R117C 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 49.1 &#b1; 2.9a,b T338I 0.93 &#b1; 0.03a,b 54.2 &#b1; 3.7a,b L997F 0.90 &#b1; 0.04a,b 59.8 &#b1; 10.4a,b D110H 0.97 &#b1; 0.01a,b 60.6 &#b1; 1.5a,b S341P 0.79 &#b1; 0.02a 65.0 &#b1; 4.9a,b R668C 0.94 &#b1; 0.03a,b 68.5 &#b1; 1.9a,b R74W 0.78 &#b1; 0.01a 69.0 &#b1; 2.7a,b D110E 0.92 &#b1; 0.05a,b 87.5 &#b1; 9.5a,b R334W 0.91 &#b1; 0.05a,b 97.6 &#b1; 10.0a,b K1060T 0.87 &#b1; 0.02a,b 109.9 &#b1; 28.0a,b R347H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 120.7 &#b1; 2.8a,b S1235R 0.96 &#b1; 0.00a,c 139.0 &#b1; 9.0a,b E193K 0.84 &#b1; 0.02a,b 143.0 &#b1; 17.1a,b R117H 0.86 &#b1; 0.01a,b 164.5 &#b1; 34.2a,b R352Q 0.98 &#b1; 0.01a,b 179.9 &#b1; 8.0a,c F1052V 0.90 &#b1; 0.01a,b 189.9 &#b1; 33.1a,b D1152H 0.96 &#b1; 0.02a,c 312.0 &#b1; 45.5a,b Notes to Table 1: Quantification of steady-state CFTR maturation expressed as the mean (&#b1;SEM; n = 5-9) ratio of mature CFTR to total CFTR (immature plus mature) or level of mature mutant CFTR relative to mature normal-CFTR (% normal CFTR) in FRT cells individually expressing CFTR mutations. Login to comment
74 Because the level of CFTR mRNA was similar across the panel of cell lines tested, the range in baseline activity and ivacaftor response likely reflects the severity of the functional defect and/or the 0 50 100 150 200 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L E56K P67L R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V Baseline With ivacaftor * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chloride transport (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form 0 100 200 300 400 S341P R347P L467P S492F A559T A561E Y569D L1065P R1066C R1066M L1077P M1101K N1303K R560S L927P R560T H1085R V520F E92K M1V F508del H1054D I336K A46D G85E R334W T338I R1066H R352Q R117C L206W R347H S977F S945L A455E F1074L P67L E56K R1070W D110H D579G D110E R1070Q L997F A1067T E193K R117H R74W K1060T R668C D1270N D1152H S1235R F1052V * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mature CFTR (% Normal) Mutant CFTR form A B Fig. 2. Login to comment
82 Mutation Patientsa Chloride transport (bc;A/cm2 ) Chloride transport (% normal) EC50 Baseline With ivacaftor Baseline With ivacaftor Fold increase over baselineb Normal 204.5 &#b1; 33.3 301.3 &#b1; 33.8c 100.0 &#b1; 16.3 147.3 &#b1; 16.5c 1.5 266 &#b1; 42 G551D 1282 1.5 &#b1; 0.7 113.2 &#b1; 13.0c 1.0 &#b1; 0.5 55.3 &#b1; 6.3c 55.3 312 &#b1; 73 F1052V 12 177.3 &#b1; 13.7 410.2 &#b1; 11.3c 86.7 &#b1; 6.7 200.7 &#b1; 5.6c 2.3 177 &#b1; 14 S1235R ND 160.6 &#b1; 25.7 352.1 &#b1; 43.4c 78.5 &#b1; 12.6 172.2 &#b1; 21.2c 2.2 282 &#b1; 104 D1152H 185 117.3 &#b1; 23.0 282.7 &#b1; 46.9c 57.4 &#b1; 11.2 138.2 &#b1; 22.9c 2.4 178 &#b1; 67 D1270N 32 109.5 &#b1; 20.5 209.5 &#b1; 27.4c 53.6 &#b1; 10.0 102.4 &#b1; 13.4c 1.9 254 &#b1; 56 R668C 45 99.0 &#b1; 9.4 217.6 &#b1; 11.7c 48.4 &#b1; 4.6 106.4 &#b1; 5.7c 2.2 517 &#b1; 105 K1060T ND 89.0 &#b1; 9.8 236.4 &#b1; 20.3c 43.5 &#b1; 4.8 115.6 &#b1; 9.9c 2.7 131 &#b1; 73 R74W 25 86.8 &#b1; 26.9 199.1 &#b1; 16.8c 42.5 &#b1; 13.2 97.3 &#b1; 8.2c 2.3 162 &#b1; 17 R117H 739 67.2 &#b1; 13.3 274.1 &#b1; 32.2c 32.9 &#b1; 6.5 134.0 &#b1; 15.7c 4.1 151 &#b1; 14 E193K ND 62.2 &#b1; 9.8 379.1 &#b1; 1.1c 30.4 &#b1; 4.8 185.4 &#b1; 1.0c 6.1 240 &#b1; 20 A1067T ND 55.9 &#b1; 3.2 164.0 &#b1; 9.7c 27.3 &#b1; 1.6 80.2 &#b1; 4.7c 2.9 317 &#b1; 214 L997F 27 43.7 &#b1; 3.2 145.5 &#b1; 4.0c 21.4 &#b1; 1.6 71.2 &#b1; 2.0c 3.3 162 &#b1; 12 R1070Q 15 42.0 &#b1; 0.8 67.3 &#b1; 2.9c 20.6 &#b1; 0.4 32.9 &#b1; 1.4c 1.6 164 &#b1; 20 D110E ND 23.3 &#b1; 4.7 96.4 &#b1; 15.6c 11.4 &#b1; 2.3 47.1 &#b1; 7.6c 4.1 213 &#b1; 51 D579G 21 21.5 &#b1; 4.1 192.0 &#b1; 18.5c 10.5 &#b1; 2.0 93.9 &#b1; 9.0c 8.9 239 &#b1; 48 D110H 30 18.5 &#b1; 2.2 116.7 &#b1; 11.3c 9.1 &#b1; 1.1 57.1 &#b1; 5.5c 6.2 249 &#b1; 59 R1070W 13 16.6 &#b1; 2.6 102.1 &#b1; 3.1c 8.1 &#b1; 1.3 49.9 &#b1; 1.5c 6.2 158 &#b1; 48 P67L 53 16.0 &#b1; 6.7 88.7 &#b1; 15.7c 7.8 &#b1; 3.3 43.4 &#b1; 7.7c 5.6 195 &#b1; 40 E56K ND 15.8 &#b1; 3.1 63.6 &#b1; 4.4c 7.7 &#b1; 1.5 31.1 &#b1; 2.2c 4.0 123 &#b1; 33 F1074L ND 14.0 &#b1; 3.4 43.5 &#b1; 5.4c 6.9 &#b1; 1.6 21.3 &#b1; 2.6c 3.1 141 &#b1; 19 A455E 120 12.9 &#b1; 2.6 36.4 &#b1; 2.5c 6.3 &#b1; 1.2 17.8 &#b1; 1.2c 2.8 170 &#b1; 44 S945L 63 12.3 &#b1; 3.9 154.9 &#b1; 47.6c 6.0 &#b1; 1.9 75.8 &#b1; 23.3c 12.6 181 &#b1; 36 S977F 9 11.3 &#b1; 6.2 42.5 &#b1; 19.1c 5.5 &#b1; 3.0 20.8 &#b1; 9.3c 3.8 283 &#b1; 36 R347H 65 10.9 &#b1; 3.3 106.3 &#b1; 7.6c 5.3 &#b1; 1.6 52.0 &#b1; 3.7c 9.8 280 &#b1; 35 L206W 81 10.3 &#b1; 1.7 36.4 &#b1; 2.8c 5.0 &#b1; 0.8 17.8 &#b1; 1.4c 3.6 101 &#b1; 13 R117C 61 5.8 &#b1; 1.5 33.7 &#b1; 7.8c 2.9 &#b1; 0.7 16.5 &#b1; 3.8c 5.7 380 &#b1; 136 R352Q 46 5.5 &#b1; 1.0 84.5 &#b1; 7.8c 2.7 &#b1; 0.5 41.3 &#b1; 3.8c 15.2 287 &#b1; 75 R1066H 29 3.0 &#b1; 0.3 8.0 &#b1; 0.8c 1.5 &#b1; 0.1 3.9 &#b1; 0.4c 2.6 390 &#b1; 179 T338I 54 2.9 &#b1; 0.8 16.1 &#b1; 2.4c 1.4 &#b1; 0.4 7.9 &#b1; 1.2c 5.6 334 &#b1; 38 R334W 150 2.6 &#b1; 0.5 10.0 &#b1; 1.4c 1.3 &#b1; 0.2 4.9 &#b1; 0.7c 3.8 259 &#b1; 103 G85E 262 1.6 &#b1; 1.0 1.5 &#b1; 1.2 0.8 &#b1; 0.5 0.7 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS A46D ND 2.0 &#b1; 0.6 1.1 &#b1; 1.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS I336K 29 1.8 &#b1; 0.2 7.4 &#b1; 0.1c 0.9 &#b1; 0.1 3.6 &#b1; 0.1c 4 735 &#b1; 204 H1054D ND 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 8.7 &#b1; 0.3c 0.8 &#b1; 0.1 4.2 &#b1; 0.1c 5.3 187 &#b1; 20 F508del 29,018 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 12.1 &#b1; 1.7c 0.4 &#b1; 0.3 5.9 &#b1; 0.8c 14.8 129 &#b1; 38 M1V 9 0.7 &#b1; 1.4 6.5 &#b1; 1.9c 0.4 &#b1; 0.7 3.2 &#b1; 0.9c 8.0 183 &#b1; 85 E92K 14 0.6 &#b1; 0.2 4.3 &#b1; 0.8c 0.3 &#b1; 0.1 2.1 &#b1; 0.4c 7.0 198 &#b1; 46 V520F 58 0.4 &#b1; 0.2 0.5 &#b1; 0.2 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS H1085R ND 0.3 &#b1; 0.2 2.1 &#b1; 0.4 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 1.0 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS R560T 180 0.3 &#b1; 0.3 0.5 &#b1; 0.5 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS L927P 15 0.2 &#b1; 0.1 10.7 &#b1; 1.7c 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 5.2 &#b1; 0.8c 52.0 313 &#b1; 66 R560S ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 -0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 -0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS N1303K 1161 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 0.3 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.2 NS NS M1101K 79 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1077P 42 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066M ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R1066C 100 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS L1065P 25 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS Y569D 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS A561E ND 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS A559T 43 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S492F 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 1.7 &#b1; 1.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.8 &#b1; 0.6 NS NS L467P 16 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS R347P 214 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 NS NS S341P 9 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.2 &#b1; 0.2 0.0 &#b1; 0.0 0.1 &#b1; 0.1 NS NS a Number of individuals with the individual mutation in the CFTR-2 database (www.CFTR2.org). Login to comment
92 Mutant CFTR forms that did not significantly respond to ivacaftor under the experimental conditions used in this study were generally associated with severe defects in CFTR processing A B C D E F 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 S1235R D1152H F1052V D1270N ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 R668C K1060T R74W R117H ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 E193K A1067T L997F R1070Q ivacaftor [Log M] Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) Chloride Transport ( &#b5;A/cm 2 ) 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 D110E D579G D110H R1070W ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 F1074L E56K P67L A455E ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 R347H S945L L206W S977F ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -8 -6 -4 0 T338I R1066H R117C R352Q ivacaftor [Log M] 0 100 200 300 400 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 F508del R334W H1054D E92K ivacaftor [Log M] 0 5 10 15 20 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 F508del R334W H1054D E92K R1066H T338I ivacaftor [Log M] G H I Fig. 3. Login to comment

[hide] Ivacaftor: a review of its use in patients with cy... Drugs. 2013 Sep;73(14):1595-604. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0115-2. Deeks ED
Ivacaftor: a review of its use in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Drugs. 2013 Sep;73(14):1595-604. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0115-2., [PMID:24030637]

Abstract [show]
Ivacaftor (Kalydeco) is a potentiator of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and is the first drug that treats an underlying cause of cystic fibrosis to be licensed for use. Ivacaftor increases the open probability (i.e. gating) of CFTR channels with the G551D mutation, thus enhancing chloride transport, and is indicated in a number of countries for the treatment of cystic fibrosis in patients aged >/=6 years who carry this mutation. This review focuses on pharmacological, clinical efficacy and tolerability data relevant to the use of ivacaftor in this indication. In two 48-week, double-blind, phase III trials in patients aged >/=12 (STRIVE) or 6-11 (ENVISION) years with cystic fibrosis and the G551D mutation, oral ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h significantly improved lung function relative to placebo, when used in combination with standard care. Significant improvements in pulmonary exacerbation risk (in STRIVE) as well as bodyweight and some aspects of health-related quality of life (both studies) were also seen with the drug versus placebo. Moreover, the beneficial effects of ivacaftor on parameters such as lung function and bodyweight were maintained over up to 96 weeks of treatment in an ongoing open-label extension of these studies. Ivacaftor was generally well tolerated, with headache, oropharyngeal pain, upper respiratory tract infection and nasal congestion being among the most common adverse events. Thus, ivacaftor expands the current treatment options for patients with cystic fibrosis who have the G551D mutation. Its potential for use in patients with other CFTR mutations is also of interest.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
36 Further in vitro data suggest that other CFTR proteins with residual function may also be potentiated by ivacaftor, including those with mutations that affect conductance (e.g. R117H, D110H), mildly affect CFTR processing (e.g. E56K, P67L) or have uncharacterized effects (e.g. D110E, S1235R) [5, 16]. Login to comment

[hide] Three charged amino acids in extracellular loop 1 ... J Gen Physiol. 2014 Aug;144(2):159-79. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201311122. Epub 2014 Jul 14. Cui G, Rahman KS, Infield DT, Kuang C, Prince CZ, McCarty NA
Three charged amino acids in extracellular loop 1 are involved in maintaining the outer pore architecture of CFTR.
J Gen Physiol. 2014 Aug;144(2):159-79. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201311122. Epub 2014 Jul 14., [PMID:25024266]

Abstract [show]
The cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) bears six extracellular loops (ECL1-6); ECL1 is the site of several mutations associated with CF. Mutation R117H has been reported to reduce current amplitude, whereas D110H, E116K, and R117C/L/P may impair channel stability. We hypothesized that these amino acids might not be directly involved in ion conduction and permeation but may contribute to stabilizing the outer vestibule architecture in CFTR. We used cRNA injected oocytes combined with electrophysiological techniques to test this hypothesis. Mutants bearing cysteine at these sites were not functionally modified by extracellular MTS reagents and were blocked by GlyH-101 similarly to WT-CFTR. These results suggest that these three residues do not contribute directly to permeation in CFTR. In contrast, mutants D110R-, E116R-, and R117A-CFTR exhibited instability of the open state and significantly shortened burst duration compared with WT-CFTR and failed to be locked into the open state by AMP-PNP (adenosine 5'-(beta,gamma-imido) triphosphate); charge-retaining mutants showed mainly the full open state with comparably longer open burst duration. These interactions suggest that these ECL1 residues might be involved in maintaining the outer pore architecture of CFTR. A CFTR homology model suggested that E116 interacts with R104 in both the closed and open states, D110 interacts with K892 in the fully closed state, and R117 interacts with E1126 in the open state. These interactions were confirmed experimentally. The results suggest that D110, E116, and R117 may contribute to stabilizing the architecture of the outer pore of CFTR by interactions with other charged residues.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
182 We generated D110E-, E116D-, and R117K-CFTR and observed their single-channel behavior with the inside-out patch technique in symmetrical 150 mM Cl&#e032; solution at VM = &#e032;100 mV. Login to comment
184 D110E-CFTR exhibited a much more stable full open state with mean burst duration significantly longer than D110R-CFTR (P < 0.001; Fig. 7, A and E). Login to comment
218 D110, E116, and R117 do not interact with each other locally Because charge-retaining ECL1 amino acid mutations D110E, E116D, and R117K partially rescued a steady Figure 6.ߓ Some ECL1 mutants exhibit altered rectification. Login to comment
246 (A-C) Representative single-channel currents of D110R- and D110E- (A), E116R- and E116D- (B), and R117A- and R117K-CFTR (C) recorded under the same conditions as Fig. 2 A. Login to comment
248 (D) Mean single-channel amplitude of WT-, D110R-, D110E-, E116R-, E116D-, R117A-, and R117K-CFTR. Login to comment
250 (E) Mean burst duration of WT-, D110R-, D110E-, E116R-, E116D-, R117A-, and R117K-CFTR. Login to comment
251 #, P < 0.001 indicates differences between D110R- and D110E-CFTR or E116R- and E116D-CFTR; *, P < 0.05 indicates differences between R117A- and R117K-CFTR. Login to comment
423 As shown here, mean burst durations of charge-retaining mutants D110E-, E116D-, and R117K-CFTR are significantly longer than their related charge-reversing or charge-destroying mutants D110R-, E116R-, and R117A-CFTR but distinctly shorter than that of WT-CFTR (Fig. 7). Login to comment