ABCC7 p.Ser1161Arg
ClinVar: |
c.3481A>C
,
p.Ser1161Arg
?
, not provided
|
CF databases: |
c.3481A>C
,
p.Ser1161Arg
(CFTR1)
D
,
|
Predicted by SNAP2: | A: N (61%), C: N (53%), D: N (82%), E: N (87%), F: D (63%), G: N (87%), H: N (61%), I: D (63%), K: N (66%), L: D (63%), M: D (63%), N: N (93%), P: D (75%), Q: N (87%), R: D (63%), T: N (61%), V: D (63%), W: D (80%), Y: D (71%), |
Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: N, C: D, D: N, E: N, F: D, G: N, H: N, I: D, K: N, L: D, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, T: N, V: N, W: D, Y: N, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Complete and rapid scanning of the cystic fibrosis... Hum Genet. 2001 Apr;108(4):290-8. Le Marechal C, Audrezet MP, Quere I, Raguenes O, Langonne S, Ferec C
Complete and rapid scanning of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (D-HPLC): major implications for genetic counselling.
Hum Genet. 2001 Apr;108(4):290-8., [PMID:11379874]
Abstract [show]
More than 900 mutations and more than 200 different polymorphisms have now been reported in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Ten years after the cloning of the CFTR gene, the complete scanning of the 27 exons to identify known and novel mutations remains challenging. Rapid accurate identification of mutated alleles is important for prenatal diagnosis, for cascade screening in families at risk of cystic fibrosis (CF) and for understanding the correlation between genotype and phenotype. In this study, we report the successful use of denaturing ion-pair reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (D-HPLC) to analyse rapidly the complete coding sequence of the CFTR gene. With 27 pairs of polymerase chain reaction primers, we optimised the temperature conditions required for the analysis of each amplicon and validated thetest conditions on samples from a panel of 1552 CF patients who came from France and other European countries and who had mutations and polymorphisms located in the various melting domains of the gene. D-HPLC identified 415 mutated alleles previously characterised by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing, plus 74 novel mutations reported here. This new technique for screening DNA for sequence variation was extremely accurate (it identified 100% of the CFTR alleles tested so far) and rapid (the complete CFTR gene could be analysed in less than a week). Our approach should reduce the number of untyped CF alleles in populations and thus decrease the residual risk in couples at risk of CF. This technique may be important not only for CF,but also for many other genes with a high frequency of point mutations at a variety of sites.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
133 296 Table 2 (continued) Exon/ intron Mutant name Nucleic acid change Amino acid change Effect on amino acid sequence Patient 16 S 977 F C to Tat 3062 Ser to Phe at 977 (TCC to TTC) Missense CF patient 17a G 1003 X G to T at 3139 Gly to Stop at 1003 (GGA to TGA) Nonsense CF patient 17a Q 1042 X C to T at 3256 Gln to Stop at 1042 (CAA to TAA) Nonsense CF patient 17b L 1059 L A to G at 3309 Leu to Leu at 1059 (TTA to TTG) Silent Control 17b R 1066 S C to A at 3328 Arg to Ser at 1066 (CGT to AGT) Missense CF patient 17b T 1115 T C to A at 3477 Thr to Thr at 1115 (ACC to ACA) Silent Control 17b 3499+6 A to G A to G at 3499 Splicing CF patient 17b 3499+7 T to G T to G at 3499+7 Splicing Control 18 Delta M 1140 Deletion of 3 pb Frameshift CF patient 18 M 1140 K T to A at 3551 Met to Lys at 1140 (ATG to AAG) Missense Bronchiectasis 19 S 1159 F C to T at 3608 Ser to Phe at 1159 (TCT to TTT) Missense CF patient 19 S 1161 R C to G at 3615 Ser to Arg at 1161 (AGC to AGG) Missense CF patient 19 S 1206 X C to G at 3749 Ser to Stop at 1206 (TCA to TGA) Nonsense CF patient 20 F 1257 L T to G at 3903 Phe to Leu at 1257 (TTT to TTG) Missense CF patient 20 4005+33 A to G A to G at 4005 +33 Splicing Bronchiectasis 21 V1293I G to A at 4009 Val to Ile at 1293 Missense Control 21 4015 Del A Deletion of A at 4015 Frameshift CF patient 21 N 1303 I A to T at 4040 Asn to Ile at 1303 (AAC to ATC) Missense CF patient 21 P 1306 P C to T at 4050 Pro to Pro at 1306 (CCC to CCT) Silent CF patient 21 E 1308 X G to T at 4064 Glu to Stop at 1308 (GAA to TAA) Nonsense CF patient 22 4172 Del GC Deletion of GC at 4172 Frameshift CF patient 22 R 1358 S A to T at 4206 Arg to Ser at 1358 (AGA to AGT) Missense Control 22 I 1366 T T to C at 4229 Ile to Thr at 1366 (ATC to ACC) Missense Control 23 4374+10 T to C T to C at 4374+ 10 Splicing CF patient 24 D 1477 D T to C at 4563 Asp to Asp at 1477 (GAT to GAC) Silent Control This new tool thus greatly improves genetic counselling.
X
ABCC7 p.Ser1161Arg 11379874:133:942
status: NEW[hide] Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR muta... Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM
Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606., [PMID:12007216]
Abstract [show]
Although there have been numerous reports from around the world of mutations in the gene of chromosome 7 known as CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), little attention has been given to integrating these mutant alleles into a global understanding of the population molecular genetics associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). We determined the distribution of CFTR mutations in as many regions throughout the world as possible in an effort designed to: 1) increase our understanding of ancestry-genotype relationships, 2) compare mutational arrays with disease incidence, and 3) gain insight for decisions regarding screening program enhancement through CFTR multi-mutational analyses. Information on all mutations that have been published since the identification and cloning of the CFTR gene's most common allele, DeltaF508 (or F508del), was reviewed and integrated into a centralized database. The data were then sorted and regional CFTR arrays were determined using mutations that appeared in a given region with a frequency of 0.5% or greater. Final analyses were based on 72,431 CF chromosomes, using data compiled from over 100 original papers, and over 80 regions from around the world, including all nations where CF has been studied using analytical molecular genetics. Initial results confirmed wide mutational heterogeneity throughout the world; however, characterization of the most common mutations across most populations was possible. We also examined CF incidence, DeltaF508 frequency, and regional mutational heterogeneity in a subset of populations. Data for these analyses were filtered for reliability and methodological strength before being incorporated into the final analysis. Statistical assessment of these variables revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between DeltaF508 frequency and the CF incidence levels of regional populations. Regional analyses were also performed to search for trends in the distribution of CFTR mutations across migrant and related populations; this led to clarification of ancestry-genotype patterns that can be used to design CFTR multi-mutation panels for CF screening programs. From comprehensive assessment of these data, we offer recommendations that multiple CFTR alleles should eventually be included to increase the sensitivity of newborn screening programs employing two-tier testing with trypsinogen and DNA analysis.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
109 Mutational Arrays, Detection Rates and Methods by Region* Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference Europe Albania ∆F508 (72.4%) C276X (0.7%) 74.5 55.5 4 270/146 CFGAC [1994]; Macek et al. G85E (0.7%) R1070Q (0.7%) [2002] Austria ∆F508 (62.9%) 457TAT→G (1.2%) 76.6 58.7 11 1516/580 Estiville et al. [1997]; Dörk et al. (total) G542X (3.3%) 2183AA→G (0.7%) [2000]; Macek et al. [2002] CFTRdele2,3 (2.1%) N1303K (0.6%) R1162X (1.9%) I148T (0.5%) R553X (1.7%) R117H (0.5%) G551D (1.2%) Austria ∆F508 (74.6%) 2183AA→G (2.4%) 95.3 90.8 8 126 Stuhrmann et al. [1997] (tyrol) R1162X (8.7%) G551D (1.6%) G542X (2.4%) R347P (1.6%) 2789+5G→A (2.4%) Q39X (1.6%) Belarus ∆F508 (61.2%) R553X (0.5%) 75.2 56.6 9 278/188 Dörk et al. [2000]; Macek et al. G542X (4.5%) R334W (0.5%) [2002] CFTRdele2,3 (3.3%) R347P (0.5%) N1303K (3.2%) S549N (0.5%) W1282X (1.0%) Belgium ∆F508 (75.1%) 622-1A→C (0.5%) 100.0 100.0 27 1504/522 Cuppens et al. [1993]; Mercier et G542X (3.5%) G458V (0.5%) al. [1993]; CFGAC [1994]; N1303K (2.7%) 1898+G→C (0.5%) Estivill et al.[1997] R553X (1.7%) G970R (0.5%) 1717-1G→A (1.6%) 4218insT (0.5%) E60X (1.6%) 394delTT (0.5%) W1282X (1.4%) K830X (0.5%) 2183A→G+2184delA (1.2%) E822K (0.5%) W401X (1.0%) 3272-1G→A (0.5%) A455E (1.0%) S1161R (0.5%) 3272-26A→G (1.0%) R1162X (0.5%) S1251N (1.0%) 3750delAG (0.5%) S1235R (0.8%) S1255P (0.5%) ∆I507 (0.6%) Bulgaria ∆F508 (63.6%) R75Q (1.0%) 93.0 86.5 21 948/432 Angelicheva et al. [1997]; (total) N1303K (5.6%) 2183AA→G (0.9%) Estivill et al. [1997]; Macek G542X (3.9%) G1244V+S912L (0.9%) et al. [2002] R347P (2.2%) G85E (0.9%) 1677delTA (2.1%) 2184insA (0.9%) R1070Q (1.8%) L88X+G1069R (0.8%) Q220X (1.2%) 2789+5G→A (0.8%) 3849+10KbC→T (1.1%) G1244E (0.8%) W1282X (1.0%) 1717-1G→A (0.8%) 2176insC (1.0%) Y919C (0.7%) G1069R (1.0%) WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS581 Bulgaria 1) DF508 4) 1677delTA - - 6 13 Angelicheva et al. [1997] (ethnic 2) R347P 5) Q493R Turks) 3) G542X 6) L571S - - 1 30 Angelicheva et al. [1997] Bulgaria 1) DF508 (100.0%) (Gypsy) Croatia ∆F508 (64.5%) G551D (1.1%) 72.5 52.6 5 276 Macek et al. [2002] G542X (3.3%) 3849+10KbC→T (0.7%) N1303K (2.9%) Czech ∆F508 (70.0%) 1898+1G→T (2.0%) 89.6 80.3 10 2196/628 CFGAC [1994]; Estiville et al. Republic CFTRdele2,3 (5.5%) 2143delT (1.2%) [1997]; Dörk et al. [2000]; G551D (3.8%) R347P (0.8%) Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (2.9%) 3849+10KbC→T (0.6%) G542X (2.2%) W1282X (0.6%) Denmark ∆F508 (87.5%) G542X (0.7%) 92.3 85.2 6 1888/678 CFGAC [1994]; Schwartz et al. (excluding 394delTT (1.8%) 621+1G→T (0.6%) [1994]; Estiville et al. [1997] Faroe) N1303K (1.1%) 3659delC (0.6%) Estonia ∆F508 (51.7%) R117C (1.7%) 80.2 64.3 10 165/80 Estivill et al. [1997]; Klaassen et 394delTT (13.3%) E217G (1.7%) al. [1998]; Macek et al. S1235R (3.3%) R1066H (1.7%) [2002] 359insT (1.7%) 3659delC (1.7%) I1005R (1.7%) S1169X (1.7%) Finland ∆F508 (46.2%) G542X (1.9%) 78.8 62.1 4 132/52 CFGAC [1994]; Kere et al. 394delTT (28.8%) 3372delA (1.9%) [1994]; Estivill et al. [1997] France ∆F508 (67.7%) 2789+5G→T (0.79%) 79.7 63.6 12 17854/7420 Chevalier-Porst et al. [1994]; (total) G542X (2.94%) 2184delA+2183A→G (0.77%) Estivill et al. [1997]; Claustres et al. [2000]; Guilloud-Bataille N1303K (1.83%) G551D (0.74%) et al. [2000] 1717-1G→A (1.35%) 1078delT (0.63%) W1282X (0.91%) ∆I507 (0.62%) R553X (0.86%) Y122K (0.59%) France ∆F508 (75.8%) R297Q (0.8%) 98.7 97.4 18 599/365 Férec et al. [1992]; Scotet et al. (Brittany) 1078delT (4.0%) R347H (0.8%) [2000] G551D (3.6%) I1234V (0.8%) N1303K (3.0%) R553X (0.8%) R117H (1.7%) 2789+5G→A (0.8%) 3272-26A→G (1.3%) 4005+1G→A (0.7%) G542X (1.1%) 621+1G→T (0.6%) 1717-1G→A (1.0%) ∆I507 (0.6%) G1249R (0.8%) W846X (0.5%) France ∆F508 (70.0%) N1303K (0.8%) 90.4 81.7 16 250 Claustres et al. [1993] (southern) G542X (6.4%) 3737delA (0.8%) 1717-1G→A (1.6%) R1162X (0.8%) L206W (1.2%) Y1092X (0.8%) R334W (1.2%) S945L (0.8%) ∆I507 (1.2%) K710X (0.8%) 2184delA (1.2%) 1078delT (0.8%) R1158X (1.2%) Y122X (0.8%) (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL.
X
ABCC7 p.Ser1161Arg 12007216:109:1480
status: NEW