ABCC7 p.Ala96Glu
| ClinVar: |
c.287C>A
,
p.Ala96Glu
?
, not provided
|
| CF databases: |
c.287C>A
,
p.Ala96Glu
(CFTR1)
?
, This mutation was found in a Turkish patient.
|
| Predicted by SNAP2: | C: N (61%), D: D (80%), E: D (80%), F: D (80%), G: D (66%), H: D (85%), I: N (53%), K: D (85%), L: D (53%), M: D (53%), N: D (71%), P: D (66%), Q: D (75%), R: D (80%), S: N (78%), T: N (78%), V: N (78%), W: D (85%), Y: D (80%), |
| Predicted by PROVEAN: | C: N, D: N, E: N, F: N, G: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: N, Y: N, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Complete and rapid scanning of the cystic fibrosis... Hum Genet. 2001 Apr;108(4):290-8. Le Marechal C, Audrezet MP, Quere I, Raguenes O, Langonne S, Ferec C
Complete and rapid scanning of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (D-HPLC): major implications for genetic counselling.
Hum Genet. 2001 Apr;108(4):290-8., [PMID:11379874]
Abstract [show]
More than 900 mutations and more than 200 different polymorphisms have now been reported in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Ten years after the cloning of the CFTR gene, the complete scanning of the 27 exons to identify known and novel mutations remains challenging. Rapid accurate identification of mutated alleles is important for prenatal diagnosis, for cascade screening in families at risk of cystic fibrosis (CF) and for understanding the correlation between genotype and phenotype. In this study, we report the successful use of denaturing ion-pair reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (D-HPLC) to analyse rapidly the complete coding sequence of the CFTR gene. With 27 pairs of polymerase chain reaction primers, we optimised the temperature conditions required for the analysis of each amplicon and validated thetest conditions on samples from a panel of 1552 CF patients who came from France and other European countries and who had mutations and polymorphisms located in the various melting domains of the gene. D-HPLC identified 415 mutated alleles previously characterised by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing, plus 74 novel mutations reported here. This new technique for screening DNA for sequence variation was extremely accurate (it identified 100% of the CFTR alleles tested so far) and rapid (the complete CFTR gene could be analysed in less than a week). Our approach should reduce the number of untyped CF alleles in populations and thus decrease the residual risk in couples at risk of CF. This technique may be important not only for CF,but also for many other genes with a high frequency of point mutations at a variety of sites.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
114 At 56°C, the profiles of ∆F508 and M470V are identical 295 Table 2 Novel nucleotide changes identified in the CFTR gene and detected by D-HPLC Exon/ intron Mutant name Nucleic acid change Amino acid change Effect on amino acid sequence Patient 1 185+1 G to T G to T at 185+1 Splicing CF patient 2 186 - 13 C to G C to G at 186-13 Silent CF patient 2 211 Del G Deletion of G at 211 Frameshift CF patient 2 237 Ins A Insertion A at 237 Frameshift CF patient 2 296+2 T to C 296+2 T to C Splicing CF patient 3 W 57 X2 G to A at 303 Trp to Stop at 57 (TGG to TGA) Nonsense CF patient 3 306 InsA Insertion of A at 306 Frameshift CF patient 3 306 Ins C Insertion of C at 306 Frameshift CF patient 3 W 79 X G to A at 368 Trp to Stop at 79 (TGG to TAG) Nonsense CF patient 4 A 96 E C to A at 419 Ala to Glu at 96 (GCA to GAA) Missense CF patient 4 L 127 X T to G at 512 Nonsense CF patient 4 541 Del CTCC Deletion of CTCC at 541 Leu to Stop at 127 (TTA to TGA) Frameshift CF patient 5 L 165 S T to C at 626 Leu to Ser at 165 (TTA to TCA) Missense CF patient 5 R 170 C C to T at 640 Arg to Cys at 170 (CGT to TGT) Missense Control 6a L 206 F G to T at 750 Leu to Phe at 206 (TTG to TTT) Missense CF patient 6a A 209 S G to T at 757 Ala to Ser at 209 (GCA toTCA) Missense CF patient 6a A 209 A A to G at 759 Ala to Ala at 209 (GCA to GCG) Silent CF patient 6a C 225 X T to A at 807 Cys to Stop at 225 (TGT to TGA) Nonsense CF patient 6a G 241 R G to A at 852 Gly to Arg at 241 (GGG to AGG) Missense CF patient 6b 905 Del G Deletion of Gat 905 Frameshift CF patient 7 A 309 A C to G at 1059 Ala to Ala at 309 (GCC to GCG) Silent Control 7 V 322 M G to A at 1096 Val to Met at 322 (GTG to ATG) Silent CF patient 7 R 334 Q G to A at 1133 Arg to Gln at 334 (CGG toCAG) Missense Control 7 Q 353 H A to C at 1191 Gln to His at 353 (CAA to CAC) Missense CF patient 7 1248+1 G to C G to C at 1248+1 Splicing CF patient 8 L 383 L G to A at 1281 Leu to Leu at 383 (TTG to TTA) Silent Control 8 W 401 X G to A at 1334 Trp to Stop at 401 (TGG to TAG) Nonsense CF patient 8 E 403 D G to C at 1341 Glu to Asp at 403 (GAG to CAG) Missense CF patient 9 1367 Del C Frameshift CF patient 10 1525 - 2 A to G Deletion of C at 1367 Splicing CF patient 10 G 480 G T to C at 1572 Gly to Gly at 480 (GGT to GGC) Silent CF patient 10 1576 Ins T Insertion of T at 1576 Frameshift CF patient 10 H 484 R A to G at 1583 His to Arg at 484 (CAC to CGC) Missense Neonatal hypertrypsinaemia 10 I506 V A to G at 1648 Ileto Val at 506 (ATC to GTC) Silent Control 11 1717 - 19 T to C T to C at 1717-19 Splicing ?
X
ABCC7 p.Ala96Glu 11379874:114:800
status: NEW[hide] Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR muta... Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM
Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606., [PMID:12007216]
Abstract [show]
Although there have been numerous reports from around the world of mutations in the gene of chromosome 7 known as CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), little attention has been given to integrating these mutant alleles into a global understanding of the population molecular genetics associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). We determined the distribution of CFTR mutations in as many regions throughout the world as possible in an effort designed to: 1) increase our understanding of ancestry-genotype relationships, 2) compare mutational arrays with disease incidence, and 3) gain insight for decisions regarding screening program enhancement through CFTR multi-mutational analyses. Information on all mutations that have been published since the identification and cloning of the CFTR gene's most common allele, DeltaF508 (or F508del), was reviewed and integrated into a centralized database. The data were then sorted and regional CFTR arrays were determined using mutations that appeared in a given region with a frequency of 0.5% or greater. Final analyses were based on 72,431 CF chromosomes, using data compiled from over 100 original papers, and over 80 regions from around the world, including all nations where CF has been studied using analytical molecular genetics. Initial results confirmed wide mutational heterogeneity throughout the world; however, characterization of the most common mutations across most populations was possible. We also examined CF incidence, DeltaF508 frequency, and regional mutational heterogeneity in a subset of populations. Data for these analyses were filtered for reliability and methodological strength before being incorporated into the final analysis. Statistical assessment of these variables revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between DeltaF508 frequency and the CF incidence levels of regional populations. Regional analyses were also performed to search for trends in the distribution of CFTR mutations across migrant and related populations; this led to clarification of ancestry-genotype patterns that can be used to design CFTR multi-mutation panels for CF screening programs. From comprehensive assessment of these data, we offer recommendations that multiple CFTR alleles should eventually be included to increase the sensitivity of newborn screening programs employing two-tier testing with trypsinogen and DNA analysis.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
112 Jewish 1) 405+1G®A (48.0%) 3) W1282X (17.0%) - - 4 23 Kerem et al. [1995] (Tunisia) 2) DF508 (31.0%) 4) 3849+10KbC®T (4.0%) Jewish 1) G85E 4) G542X - - 6 10 Kerem et al. [1995] (Turkey) 2) DF508 5) 3849+10KbC®T 3) W1282X 6) W1089X Jewish (Yemen) None - - 0 5 Kerem et al. [1995] Lebanon 1) DF508 (35.0%) 6) 4096-28G®A (2.5%) - - 9 40 Desgeorges et al. [1997] 2) W1282X (20.0%) 7) 2789+5G®A (2.5%) 3) 4010del4 (10.0%) 8) M952I (2.5%) 4) N1303K (10.0%) 9) E672del (2.5%) 5) S4X (5.0%) Reunion ∆F508 (52.0%) 1717-1G→A (0.7%) 90.4 81.7 9 138 Cartault et al. [1996] Island Y122X (24.0%) G542X (0.7%) 3120+1G→A (8.0%) A309G (0.7%) A455E (2.2%) 2789+5G→A (0.7%) G551D (1.4%) Saudi North: 3) H139L - - North 1 49 families El-Harith et al. [1997]; Arabia 1) 1548delG 4) L1177X Central 3 Kambouris et al. [1997]; Central: 5) DF508 South 4 Banjar et al. [1999] 1)I1234V 6) 3120+1G®A West 9 2)1548delG 7) 425del42 East 6 3)DF508 8) R553X South: 9) N1303K 1) I1234V East: 2) 1548delG 1) 3120+1G®A 3) 711+1G®T 2) H139L 4) 3120+1G®A 3) 1548delG West: 4) DF508 1) I1234V 5) S549R 2) G115X 6) N1303K Tunisia ∆F508 (17.6%) G85E (2.6%) 58.7 34.5 11 78 Messaoud et al. [1996] G542X (8.9%) W1282X (2.6%) 711+1G→T (7.7%) Y122X (1.3%) N1303K (6.4%) T665S (1.3%) 2766del8NT (6.4%) R47W+D1270N (1.3%) R1066C (2.6%) Turkeye ∆F508 (24.5%) 1066L (1.3%) 80.6 65.0 36 1067/670 Yilmaz et al. [1995]; Estivill et al. 1677delTA (4.1%) E822X (1.3%) [1997]; Onay et al. [1998]; 2789+5G→A (3.9%) 2183+5G→A+2184insA (1.3%) Macek et al. [2002] 2181delA (3.8%) D110H (0.8%) R347H (3.6%) P1013L (0.8%) N1303K (2.9%) 3172delAC (0.8%) 621+1G→T (2.6%) 1259insA (0.8%) G542X (2.6%) M1028I (0.8%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS587 E92K (2.6%) 4005+1G→A (0.7%) A96E (2.6%) W1282X (0.7%) M152V (2.6%) I148T (0.6%) 2183AA→G (2.5%) R1162X (0.6%) 296+9A→T (1.6%) D1152H (0.6%) 2043delG (1.4%) W1098X (0.6%) E92X (1.4%) E831X (0.6%) K68N (1.4%) W496X (0.6%) G85E (1.3%) F1052V (0.5%) R1158X (1.3%) L571S (0.5%) United Arab S549R (61.5%) ∆F508 (26.9%) 88.4 78.1 2 86/52 Frossard et al. [1988]; Emirates Frossard et al. [1999] North/Central/South Americas Argentina ∆F508 (58.6%) N1303K (1.8%) 69.1 47.7 5 326/228 CFGAC [1994]; Chertkoff et al. W1282X (3.9%) 1717-1G→A (0.9%) [1997] G542X (3.9%) Brazilf ∆F508 (47.7%) W1282X (1.3%) 66.8 44.6 10 820/500 CFGAC [1994]; Cabello et al. (total) G542X (7.2%) G85E (1.3%) [1999]; Raskin et al. [1999]; R1162X (2.5%) R553X (0.7%) Bernardino et al. [2000] R334W (2.5%) L206W (0.6%) N1303K (2.4%) 2347delG (0.6%) South East: >∆F508, G542X South: >N1303K Brazil ∆F508 (31.7%) N1303K (2.5%) 42.5 18.1 3 120 Parizotto and Bertuzzo [1997] (Sao Paulo) G542X (8.3%) Canada ∆F508 (59.0%) G542X (0.5%) 98.5 97.0 13 381/200 Rozen et al. [1992]; (Lac St. Jean) 621+1G→T (24.3%) N1303K (0.5%) De Braekeleer et al. [1998] A445E (8.2%) Q890X (0.5%) Y1092X (1.2%) S489X (0.5) 711+1G→T (1.0%) R117C (0.5%) I148T (1.0%) R1158 (0.5%) G85E (0.8%) Canada ∆F508 (71.4%) ∆I507 (1.3%) 90.9 82.6 7 77 Rozen et al. [1992] (Quebec City) 711+1G→T (9.1%) Y1092X (1.3%) 621+1G→T (5.2%) N1303K (1.3%) A455E (1.3%) Canada ∆F508 (70.9%) W1282X (0.9%) 82.0 67.2 10 632 Kristidis et al. [1992] (Toronto) G551D (3.1%) R117H (0.9%) G542X (2.2%) 1717-1G→A (0.6%) 621+1G→T (1.3%) R560T (0.6%) N1303K (0.9%) ∆I507 (0.6%) Chile ∆F508 (29.2%) R553X (4.2%) 33.4 11.2 2 72 Rios et al. [1994] Columbia 1) DF508 (35.4%) 3) N1303K (2.1%) - - 4 48 Restrepo et al. [2000] 2) G542X (6.3%) 4) W1282X (2.1%) Ecuador 1) DF508 (25%) - - 1 20 Paz-y-Mino et al. [1999] (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL.
X
ABCC7 p.Ala96Glu 12007216:112:2035
status: NEW