ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Thr360Lys

ClinVar:	c.1079C>G , p.Thr360Arg ? , not provided
Predicted by SNAP2:	A: D (80%), C: D (85%), D: D (85%), E: D (91%), F: D (91%), G: D (85%), H: D (91%), I: D (85%), K: D (91%), L: D (91%), M: D (80%), N: D (80%), P: D (91%), Q: D (80%), R: D (91%), S: D (75%), V: D (85%), W: D (95%), Y: D (91%),
Predicted by PROVEAN:	A: N, C: N, D: N, E: N, F: N, G: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, V: N, W: N, Y: N,

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] Prevalence of cystic fibrosis mutations in Israeli... Genet Test. 2001 Spring;5(1):47-52. Orgad S, Neumann S, Loewenthal R, Netanelov-Shapira I, Gazit E
Prevalence of cystic fibrosis mutations in Israeli Jews.
Genet Test. 2001 Spring;5(1):47-52., [PMID:11336401]

Abstract [show]
The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening policies of cystic fibrosis (CF) in the Jewish population. The prevalence of mutations that account for CF in Israel have been defined in the past by determining the frequency of CF mutations in affected individuals. This study is a population-based study and is, therefore, different from previous patient-based studies. We found that the CF mutations D1152H, W1089X, and 405 + IG-->A were present in some ethnic groups in which no CF patients carrying these mutations were reported. These facts necessitate a reevaluation of the screening policy regarding the ethnic groups in Israel. We studied 9,430 healthy Jewish Israeli individuals of 36 countries of origin. The prevalence of CF mutations was 1:19, 1:19, 1:28, and 1:42 for the Ashkenazi, Sephardi, North African, and Eastern Jews, respectively. CF mutations were identified in 374 (4.0%) individuals. These included 173 (46.3%) carriers of the W1282X mutation; 110 (29.4%) found to carry delF508; 23 (6.1%) who carried G542X; 22 (5.9%) who carried 3849 + 10Kb (C-->T; 20 (5.3%) who carried D1152H; 10 (2.7%) who carried N1303K; 11 (2.9%) who carried 405 + IG-->A; 4 (1.1%) who carried W1089X; and one (0.3%) who carried S549R. No carriers were detected for the 1717-1G-->A, G85E, and T360K mutations, which were tested for in 7,383, 1,558, and 41 individuals, respectively.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
40 THE CONSENSUS POLICY OF SCREENING OF CF MUTATIONS IN ETHNIC GROUPS OF ISRAELI JEWSa Buchara and Iran Georgia Libya Morocco Tunis Turkey Egypt Sephardi W1089X 1 1 1 G85E 1 1 405-1 G® A 1 1 1 S549R 1 1 D1152H 1 1 1 1 T360K 1 Individuals of all ethnic groups were screened for the mutations W1282X, delF508, G5429X, N1303K, 3849110Kb C® T and 1717-1G® A. Login to comment
45 There were 173 (46.3%) carriers of the W1282X mutation; 110 (29.4%) carriers of delF508; 23 (6.1%) carriers of G542X; 10 (2.7%) carriers of N1303K; and 22 (5.9%) carriers of 3849 1 10KbC R T. Twenty (5.3%) were found to carry D1152H; 11 (2.9%) carried 405 1 1G R A; 4 (1.1%) carried W1089X; and 1 (0.3%) carried S549R. No carriers were detected for the mutations 1717-1G R A, G85E, and T360K, which were tested for in 7,383, 1,436, and 41 individuals, respectively. Login to comment
86 On the other hand, some mutations that were found in CF patients were not detected in the healthy cohort we studied, namely, G85E, 1717-1G R A, and T360K. Login to comment
87 It should be noted, however, that we tested only 41 Georgian Jews, and, if the frequency of T360K is around 1% in this ethnic group, it is not surprising that we did not detect it in such a small sample. Login to comment

[hide] Improved detection of cystic fibrosis mutations in... Genet Med. 2001 May-Jun;3(3):168-76. Heim RA, Sugarman EA, Allitto BA
Improved detection of cystic fibrosis mutations in the heterogeneous U.S. population using an expanded, pan-ethnic mutation panel.
Genet Med. 2001 May-Jun;3(3):168-76., [PMID:11388756]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To determine the comparative frequency of 93 CFTR mutations in U.S. individuals with a clinical diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: A total of 5,840 CF chromosomes from Caucasians, Ashkenazi Jews, Hispanics, African Americans, Native Americans, Asians, and individuals of mixed race were analyzed using a pooled ASO hybridization strategy. RESULTS: Sixty-four mutations provided a sensitivity of 70% to 95% in all ethnic groups except Asians, and at least 81% when the U.S. population was considered as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: For population-based carrier screening for CF in the heterogeneous U.S. population, which is characterized by increasing admixture, a pan-ethnic mutation panel of 50 to 70 CFTR mutations may provide a practical test that maximizes sensitivity.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
87 These were G91R, 711 ϩ 5GϾA, T338I, 712-1GϾT, Q359K/T360K, 1161delC, 1609delCA, S549I, Q552X, 1949del84, 1989 ϩ 5GϾT, S1251N, and R1283M. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR muta... Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM
Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606., [PMID:12007216]

Abstract [show]
Although there have been numerous reports from around the world of mutations in the gene of chromosome 7 known as CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), little attention has been given to integrating these mutant alleles into a global understanding of the population molecular genetics associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). We determined the distribution of CFTR mutations in as many regions throughout the world as possible in an effort designed to: 1) increase our understanding of ancestry-genotype relationships, 2) compare mutational arrays with disease incidence, and 3) gain insight for decisions regarding screening program enhancement through CFTR multi-mutational analyses. Information on all mutations that have been published since the identification and cloning of the CFTR gene's most common allele, DeltaF508 (or F508del), was reviewed and integrated into a centralized database. The data were then sorted and regional CFTR arrays were determined using mutations that appeared in a given region with a frequency of 0.5% or greater. Final analyses were based on 72,431 CF chromosomes, using data compiled from over 100 original papers, and over 80 regions from around the world, including all nations where CF has been studied using analytical molecular genetics. Initial results confirmed wide mutational heterogeneity throughout the world; however, characterization of the most common mutations across most populations was possible. We also examined CF incidence, DeltaF508 frequency, and regional mutational heterogeneity in a subset of populations. Data for these analyses were filtered for reliability and methodological strength before being incorporated into the final analysis. Statistical assessment of these variables revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between DeltaF508 frequency and the CF incidence levels of regional populations. Regional analyses were also performed to search for trends in the distribution of CFTR mutations across migrant and related populations; this led to clarification of ancestry-genotype patterns that can be used to design CFTR multi-mutation panels for CF screening programs. From comprehensive assessment of these data, we offer recommendations that multiple CFTR alleles should eventually be included to increase the sensitivity of newborn screening programs employing two-tier testing with trypsinogen and DNA analysis.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
111 Slovakia ∆F508 (57.3%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.2%) 82.7 68.4 14 908/254 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. G542X (6.8%) 3849+10KbC→T (1.0%) [1997]; Dörk et al. [2000]; R553X (4.0%) S42F (0.9%) Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (3.4%) R75X (0.9%) 2143delT (1.8%) G85E (0.9%) R347P (1.4%) 605insT (0.9%) W1282X (1.3%) 1898+1G→A (0.9%) Slovenia ∆F508 (57.8%) R347P (1.1%) 79.7 63.5 16 455/132 CFGAC [1994]; Dörk et al. 2789+5G→A (4.1%) S4X (0.8%) [2000]; Macek et al. [2002] R1162X (3.2%) 457TAT→G (0.8%) G542X (1.9%) D192G (0.8%) Q552X (1.5%) R553X (0.8%) Q685X (1.5%) A559T (0.8%) 3905insT (1.5%) 2907delTT (0.8%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.5%) 3667ins4 (0.8%) Spain ∆F508 (52.7%) G85E (0.8%) 80.2 64.3 21 3608/1356 Chillón et al. [1994]; Casals et G542X (8.0%) R1066C (0.8%) al. [1997]; Estivill et al. [1997] N1303K (2.5%) 2789+5G→A (0.7%) 3601-111G→C (2.0%) 2869insG (0.7%) 1811+1.6Kb A→G (1.7%) ∆I507 (0.6%) R1162X (1.6%) W1282X (0.6%) 711+1G→T (1.3%) L206W (0.5%) R334W (1.2%) R709X (0.5%) Q890X (1.0%) K710X (0.5%) 1609delCA (1.0%) 3272-26A→G (0.5%) 712-1G→T (1.0%) Sweden ∆F508 (66.6%) E60X (0.6%) 85.9 73.8 10 1357/662 Schwartz et al. [1994]; Estivill et 394delTT (7.3%) Y109C (0.6%) al. [1997]; Schaedel et al. 3659delC (5.4%) R117H (0.6%) [1999] 175insT (2.4%) R117C (0.6%) T338I (1.2%) G542X (0.6%) Switzerland ∆F508 (57.2%) K1200E (2.1%) 91.3 83.4 9 1268/1173 Estivill et al. [1997]; R553X (14.0%) N1303K (1.2%) Hergersberg et al. [1997] 3905insT (9.8%) W1282X (1.1%) 1717-1G→A (2.7%) R347P (0.6%) G542X (2.6%) Ukraine ∆F508 (65.2%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.1%) 74.6 55.7 6 1055/580 Estivill et al. [1997]; Dörk et al. R553X (3.6%) G551D (1.8%) [2000]; Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (2.4%) W1282X (0.5%) United ∆F508 (75.3%) 621+1G→T (0.93%) 81.6 66.6 5 19622/9815 Schwartz et al. [1995b]; Kingdom G551D (3.1%) 1717-1G→A (0.57%) Estivill et al. [1997] (total) G542X (1.7%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS585 United ∆F508 (56.6%) 621+1G→T (1.8%) 69.1 47.7 7 456 CFGAC [1994] Kingdom G551D (3.7%) R117H (1.5%) (N. Ireland) R560T (2.6%) ∆I507 (0.9%) G542X (2.0%) United ∆F508 (19.2%) 621+2T→C (3.8%) 84.4 71.2 11 52 Malone et al. [1998] Kingdom Y569D (15.4%) 2184insA (3.8%) (Pakistani) Q98X (11.5%) R560S (1.9%) 1525-1G→A (9.6%) 1898+1G→T (1.9%) 296+12T→C (7.7%) R709X (1.9%) 1161delC (7.7%) United ∆F508 (71.3%) 1717-1G→A (1.0%) 86.4 74.6 9 1236/730 Shrimpton et al. [1991]; Kingdom G551D (5.5%) 621+1G→T (0.6%) Gilfillan et al. [1998] (Scotland) G542X (4.0%) ∆I507 (0.6%) R117H (1.4%) R560T (0.6%) P67L (1.4%) United ∆F508 (71.6%) 1717-1G→A (1.1%) 98.7 97.4 17 183 Cheadle et al. [1993] Kingdom 621+1G→T (6.6%) 3659delC (0.5%) (Wales) 1898+1G→A (5.5%) R117H (0.5%) G542X (2.2%) N1303K (0.5%) G551D (2.2%) E60X (0.5%) 1078delT (2.2%) S549N (0.5%) R1283M (1.6%) 3849+10KbC→T (0.5%) R553X (1.1%) 4016insT (0.5%) ∆I507 (1.1%) Yugoslavia ∆F508 (68.9%) 3849G→A (1.0%) 82.2 67.6 11 709/398 Dabovic et al. [1992]; Estivill et G542X (4.0%) N1303K (0.8%) al. [1997]; Macek et al. R1162C (3.0%) 525delT (0.5%) (submitted for publication) 457TAT→G (1.0%) 621+1G→T (0.5%) I148T (1.0%) G551D (0.5%) Q552X (1.0%) Middle East/Africa Algeria 1) DF508 (20.0%) 4) 1812-1G®A (5.0%) - - 5 20 Loumi et al. [1999] 2) N1303K (20.0%) 5) V754M (5.0%) 3) 711+1G®T (10.0%) Jewish W1282X (48.0%) 3849+10KbC→T (6.0%) 95.0 90.3 6 261 Kerem et al. [1995] (Ashkenazi) ∆F508 (28.0%) N1303K (3.0%) G542X (9.0%) 1717-1G→A (1.0%) Jewish 1) N1303K - - 1 6 Kerem et al. [1995] (Egypt) Jewish 1) Q359K/T360K - - 1 8 Kerem et al. [1995] (Georgia) Jewish 1) DF508 2) 405+1G®A - - 2 11 Kerem et al. [1995] (Libya) Jewish 1) DF508 (72.0%) 3) D1152H (6.0%) - - 3 33 Kerem et al. [1995] (Morocco) 2) S549R (6.0%) Jewish ∆F508 (35.0%) W1282X (2.0%) 43.0 18.5 4 51 Shoshani et al. [1992] (Sepharadim) G542X (4.0%) S549I (2.0%) (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL. Login to comment

[hide] Analysis by mass spectrometry of 100 cystic fibros... Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2066-72. Wang Z, Milunsky J, Yamin M, Maher T, Oates R, Milunsky A
Analysis by mass spectrometry of 100 cystic fibrosis gene mutations in 92 patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens.
Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2066-72., [PMID:12151438]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Limited mutation analysis for congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) has revealed only a minority of men in whom two distinct mutations were detected. We aimed to determine whether a more extensive mutation analysis would be of benefit in genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 92 men with CBAVD using mass spectrometry and primer oligonucleotide base extension to analyse an approximately hierarchical set of the most common 100 CF mutations. RESULTS: Analysis of 100 CF mutations identified 33/92 (35.9%) patients with two mutations and 29/92 (31.5%) with one mutation, compound heterozygosity accounting for 94% (31/33) of those with two mutations. This panel detected 12.0% more CBAVD men with at least one mutation and identified a second mutation in >50% of those considered to be heterozygotes under the two routine 25 mutation panel analyses. CONCLUSION: Compound heterozygosity of severe/mild mutations accounted for the vast majority of the CBAVD patients with two mutations, and underscores the value of a more extensive CF mutation panel for men with CBAVD. The CF100 panel enables higher carrier detection rates especially for men with CBAVD, their partners, partners of known CF carriers, and those with 'mild' CF with rarer mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
20 Given the frequency of CF mutations, especially in the Caucasian population ( in 25), and the common request by CBAVD men to sire their own offspring by using surgical Table I. The 100 most common cystic fibrosis mutations listed by exon Mutationa Exonb Frequency (%)c G85E 3 0.1 394delTT 3 Swedish E60X 3 Belgium R75X 3 405ϩ1G→A Int 3 R117H 4 0.30 Y122X 4 French 457TAT→G 4 Austria I148T 4 Canada (French Canadian) 574delA 4 444delA 4 R117L 4 621ϩ1G→T Int 4 0.72 711ϩ1G→T Int 5 Ͼ0.1 712-1G→T Int 5 711ϩ5G→A Int 5 Italy (Caucasian) L206W 6a R347P 7 0.24 1078delT 7 Ͼ0.1 R334W 7 Ͼ0.1 1154InsTC 7 T338I 7 Italy R347H 7 Turkey Q359K/T360K 7 Israel (Georgian Jews) I336K 7 R352Q 7 G330X 7 S364P 7 A455E 9 0.20 I507 10 0.21 F508 10 66.02 1609delCA 10 Spain (Caucasian) V520F 10 Q493X 10 C524X 10 G480C 10 Q493R 10 1717-1G→A Int 10 0.58 R553X 11 0.73 G551D 11 1.64 G542X 11 2.42 R560T 11 Ͼ0.1 S549N 11 Q552X 11 Italy S549I 11 Israel (Arabs) A559T 11 African American R553G 11 R560K 11 1812-1G→A Int 11 A561E 12 E585X 12 Y563D 12 Y563N 12 1898ϩ1G→A Int 12 0.22 1898ϩ1G→C Int 12 2183AA→G 13 Italian 2184delA 13 Ͻ0.1 K710X 13 2143delT 13 Moscow (Russian) 2184InsA 13 1949del84 13 Spain (Spanish) 2176InsC 13 2043delG 13 2307insA 13 2789ϩ5G→A Int 14b Ͼ0.1 2869insG 15 S945L 15 Q890X 15 3120G→A 16 2067 Table I. continued Mutationa Exonb Frequency (%)c 3120ϩ1G→A Int 16 African American 3272-26A→G Int 17a R1066C 17b Portugal (Portugese) L1077P 17b R1070Q 17b Bulgarian W1089X 17b M1101K 17b Canada (Hutterite) R1070P 17b R1162X 19 0.29 3659delC 19 Ͼ0.1 3849G→A 19 3662delA 19 3791delC 19 3821delT 19 Russian Q1238X 19 S1235R 19 France, South S1196X 19 K1177R 19 3849ϩ10kbC→T Int 19 0.24 3849ϩ4A→G Int 19 W1282X 20 1.22 S1251N 20 Dutch, Belgian 3905insT 20 Swiss, Acadian, Amish G1244E 20 R1283M 20 Welsh W1282R 20 D1270N 20 S1255X 20 African American 4005ϩ1G→A Int 20 N1303K 21 1.34 W1316X 21 aMutations were chosen according to their frequencies (Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium, 1994; Zielenski and Tsui, 1995; Estivill et al., 1997). Login to comment

[hide] CFTR mutation distribution among U.S. Hispanic and... Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):392-9. Sugarman EA, Rohlfs EM, Silverman LM, Allitto BA
CFTR mutation distribution among U.S. Hispanic and African American individuals: evaluation in cystic fibrosis patient and carrier screening populations.
Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):392-9., [PMID:15371903]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We reviewed CFTR mutation distribution among Hispanic and African American individuals referred for CF carrier screening and compared mutation frequencies to those derived from CF patient samples. METHODS: Results from CFTR mutation analyses received from January 2001 through September 2003, were analyzed for four populations: Hispanic individuals with a CF diagnosis (n = 159) or carrier screening indication (n = 15,333) and African American individuals with a CF diagnosis (n = 108) or carrier screening indication (n = 8,973). All samples were tested for the same 87 mutation panel. RESULTS: In the Hispanic population, 42 mutations were identified: 30 in the patient population (77.5% detection rate) and 33 among carrier screening referrals. Five mutations not included in the ACMG/ACOG carrier screening panel (3876delA, W1089X, R1066C, S549N, 1949del84) accounted for 7.55% detection in patients and 5.58% among carriers. Among African American referrals, 33 different mutations were identified: 21 in the patient population (74.4% detection) and 23 in the carrier screening population. Together, A559T and 711+5G>A were observed at a detection rate of 3.71% in CF patients and 6.38% in carriers. The mutation distribution seen in both the carrier screening populations reflected an increased frequency of mutations with variable expression such as D1152H, R117H, and L206W. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed analysis of CFTR mutation distribution in the Hispanic and African American patient and carrier screening populations demonstrates that a diverse group of mutations is most appropriate for diagnostic and carrier screening in these populations. To best serve the increasingly diverse U.S. population, ethnic-specific mutations should be included in mutation panels.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
35 87 mutation panel The following mutations were included in the panel: ⌬F508, ⌬F311, ⌬I507, A455E, A559T, C524X, D1152H, D1270N, E60X, G178R, G330X, G480C, G542X, G551D, G85E, G91R, I148T, K710X, L206W, M1101K, N1303K, P574H, Q1238X, Q359K/T360K, Q493X, Q552X, Q890X, R1066C, R1158X, R1162X, R117C, R117H, R1283M, R334W, R347H, R347P, R352Q, R553X, R560T, S1196X, S1251N, S1255X, S364P, S549I, S549N, S549R, T338I, V520F, W1089X, W1282X, Y1092X, Y563D, 1078delT, 1161delC, 1609delCA, 1677delTA, 1717-1GϾA, 1812-1GϾA, 1898ϩ1GϾA, 1898ϩ5GϾT, 1949del84, 2043delG, 2143delT, 2183delAAϾG, 2184delA, 2307insA, 2789ϩ5GϾA, 2869insG, 3120ϩ1GϾA, 3120GϾA, 3659delC, 3662delA, 3791delC, 3821delT, 3849ϩ10kbCϾT, 3849ϩ4AϾG, 3905insT, 394delTT, 405ϩ1GϾA, 405ϩ3AϾC, 444delA, 574delA, 621ϩ1GϾT, 711ϩ1GϾT, 711ϩ5GϾA, 712-1GϾT, 3876delA CFTR mutation analysis Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes, buccal cell swabs, or bloodspots by Qiagen QIAmp 96 DNA Blood Kit. Specimens were tested for 87 mutations by a pooled allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridization method as previously described.16,17 Two multiplex chain reactions (PCR) were used to amplify 19 regions of the CFTR gene. Login to comment

[hide] Mutation spectrum in Jewish cystic fibrosis patien... Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Jul 30;136(3):246-8. Quint A, Lerer I, Sagi M, Abeliovich D
Mutation spectrum in Jewish cystic fibrosis patients in Israel: implication to carrier screening.
Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Jul 30;136(3):246-8., 2005-07-30 [PMID:15948195]

Abstract [show]
We have tested 144 unrelated Jewish patients suffering from the classical form of cystic fibrosis. The patients were screened for a panel of 12 mutations including the six Ashkenazi founder mutations (DeltaF508, W1282X, N1303K, G542X, 3849 + 10 kb C-->T, 1717-1G > A) and six mutations that were found in non-Ashkenazi Jewish patients (S549R (T-->G), G85E, 405 + 1G-->A, W1089X, Y1092, and D1152H). Patients of Georgian origin were tested also for the Q359K/T360K mutation. In addition, all the patients were tested for the IVS-8 variant (9T/7T/5T). Of all the cystic fibrosis (CF)-bearing chromosomes, 94% (264/281) were accounted for by one of the known mutations, and none of the patients had the 5T allele of the IVS-8 variant. Single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of the coding sequence of the CFTR gene followed by sequencing showed eight mutations on ten CF chromosomes, leaving seven chromosomes (2.5%) with unknown mutations. We identified three mutations in two or more CF chromosomes, 2571 + 1insT in Jews from Iraq, 3121-1G > A in patients from Kurdistan and I1234V in Yemenite Jewish patients. The other five mutations appeared on a single allele and are considered "private mutations." In this study we have identified 99% of CF alleles in Ashkenazi Jewish patients, 91% in Jews of North African origin and 75% in Jewish patients from Iraq. The significance of these findings to the population screening in Israel is discussed.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
26 The Q359K/T360K mutation is tested in patients from Georgia [Shoshani et al., 1993]. Login to comment
52 The patients from Georgia had the Q359K/T360K mutation on all their chromosomes. Login to comment
58 Mutations in the CF Bearing Alleles in the Jewish Patients According to the Ethnic Origin Country of origin Ashkenazi Morocco Tunisia Balkan Iraq Iran/ Kurdistan Georgia Yemen Total Number of alleles (%) 193 (69.0) 34 (12.1) 12 (4.3) 21 (7.5) 8 (2.8) 3 (0.7) 8 (2.8) 2 (0.7) 281 W1282X (%) 83 (42.8) 1 (8.3) 4 (19.0) 88 (31.3) DF508 (%) 65 (33.5) 24 (70.6) 3 (25.0) 7 (33.3) 1 100 (35.6) N1303K (%) 10 (5.2) 10 (3.6) G542X (%) 19 (10.3) 4 (19.0) 24 (8.5) 3849-10 kbC!T (%) 10 (5.1) 1 (2.9) 2 (9.5) 13 (4.6) 1717-1G!A (%) 2 (1.0) 2 (0.7) D1152H (%) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4) S549R (T!G) (%) 4 (11.8) 4 (1.4) G85E (%) 2 (9.5) 2 (0.7) 405 þ 1G!A (%) 8 (66.7) 8 (2.8) Y1092X (%) 3 (37.5) 3 (1.1) W1089X (%) 2 (9.5) 2 (0.7) Q359K/T360K (%) 8 (100) 8 (2.8) I1234V (%) 2 (100) 2 (0.7) 2751 þ 1insT (%) 2 (25.0) 2 (0.7) 3121-1G > A (%) 1 1 (0.4) M952I (%) 1 (12.5) 1 (0.4) L165S (%) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4) A455E (%) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.4) L997F (%) 1 (2.9) 1 (0.4) G1244E (%) 1 (2.9) 1 (0.4) Unkown (%) 1 (0.5) 3 (8.8) 2 (25.0) 1 7 (2.5) Mutation Spectrum in Jewish CF Patients [Wahab, 2003]. Login to comment
69 We suggest that 15 mutations that were found on two or more CF chromosomes from unrelated patients (DF508, W1282X, N1303K, G542X, 3849 þ 10 kb C!T, 1717-1 G!A, S549R (T!G), G85E, 405 þ 1G!A, W1089X, Y1092X, 2751 þ 1insT, 3121-1G!A, Q359K/T360K, I1234V) be tested in the CF screening of all Jewish individuals regardless of their origin. Login to comment

[hide] Genetics of cystic fibrosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;24(6):629-38. Gallati S
Genetics of cystic fibrosis.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;24(6):629-38., [PMID:16088579]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, which encodes a protein expressed in the apical membrane of exocrine epithelial cells. CFTR functions principally as a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-induced chloride channel and appears capable of regulating other ion channels. Mutations affect CFTR through a variety of molecular mechanisms, which can produce little or no functional gene product at the apical membrane. More than 1000 different disease-causing mutations within the CFTR gene have been described. The potential of a mutation to contribute to the phenotype depends on its type, localization in the gene, and the molecular mechanism as well as on interactions with secondary modifying factors. Genetic testing can confirm a clinical diagnosis of CF and can be used for infants with meconium ileus, for carrier detection in individuals with positive family history and partners of proven CF carriers, and for prenatal diagnostic testing if both parents are carriers. Studies of clinical phenotype in correlation with CFTR genotype have revealed a very complex relationship demonstrating that some phenotypic features are closely determined by the underlying mutations, whereas others are modulated by modifier genes, epigenetic mechanisms, and environment.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
50 In effect, virtually no func- Table 2 Unusually Common Cystic Fibrosis Mutations in Specific Populationsa Total Exon/ Number Number Frequency Mutation Intron Ethnic Origin Observed Screened (%) 296+12T→C intron 02 Pakistani 02 24 8.33 E60X exon 03 Belgian 06 394 1.52 G91R exon 03 French 04 266 1.50 394delTT exon 03 Scandinavian 78 1588 4.91 457TAT→G exon 04 Austrian 04 334 1.20 Y122X exon 04 Réunion Island 14 29 48.27 I148T exon 04 French Canadian 06 66 9.09 711+5G→A intron 05 Italian (North East) 06 225 2.67 1078delT exon 07 Celtic 27 475 5.68 1161delC exon 07 Pakistani 02 24 8.33 T338I exon 07 Italian, Sardinian 04 86 4.65 Q359K/T360K exon 07 Georgian Jews 07 8 87.50 R347H exon 07 Turkish 04 134 2.98 1609delCA exon 10 Spanish 03 96 3.12 1677delTA exon 10 Bulgarian 05 222 2.25 S549I exon 11 Arabs 02 40 5.00 Q552X exon 11 Italian (North East) 03 225 1.33 A559T exon 11 African-American 02 79 2.53 1811+1.2kbA→G intron 11 Spanish 22 1068 2.06 1898+5G→T intron 12 Chinese 03 10 30.00 1949del84 exon 13 Spanish 02 136 1.47 2143delT exon 13 Russian 04 118 3.39 2183AA→G exon 13 Italian (North East) 21 225 9.33 2184insA exon 13 Russian 03 118 2.54 3120+1G→A intron 16 African-American 14 112 12.50 3272-26A→G intron 17a Portugese, French 06 386 1.55 R1066C exon 17b Portugese 05 105 4.76 R1070Q exon 17b Bulgarian 04 166 2.41 Y1092X exon 17b French Canadian, 11 725 1.52 French M1101K exon 17b Hutterite 22 32 68.75 3821delT exon 19 Russian 03 118 2.54 S1235R exon 19 French (South) 04 340 1.18 S1251N exon 20 Dutch, Belgian 11 792 1.39 S1255X exon 20 African-American 02 79 2.53 3905insT exon 20 Swiss 45 982 4.58 Amish, Arcadian 13 86 15.12 W1282X Exon 20 Jewish-Ashkenazi 50 95 52.63 R1283M exon 20 Welsh 03 183 1.64 aAccording to the Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium, http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca/cftr/. Login to comment

[hide] The changing face of the exocrine pancreas in cyst... Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Mar;20(3):164-8. Augarten A, Ben Tov A, Madgar I, Barak A, Akons H, Laufer J, Efrati O, Aviram M, Bentur L, Blau H, Paret G, Wilschanski M, Kerem BS, Yahav Y
The changing face of the exocrine pancreas in cystic fibrosis: the correlation between pancreatic status, pancreatitis and cystic fibrosis genotype.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Mar;20(3):164-8., [PMID:18301294]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the current pancreatic status of the entire cystic fibrosis (CF) population of Israel, to analyze the clinical characteristics of the pancreatic sufficient (PS) patients, and to characterize the correlation between pancreatic status, pancreatitis, and CF genotype. METHODS: The Israeli CF database includes 505 patients. These patients were defined as being PS or insufficient according to their fecal pancreatic elastase level or by coefficient fat absorption findings. Mutations were categorized as severe (DeltaF508, W1282X, G542X, S549R, N1303K, Q359K/T360K, 405+1G, and 1717) or mild/variable (3849+10 kb, D1152H, G85E, I1234V, R334W, and 5T) based on disease severity in patients carrying these mutations. Age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms, sweat-chloride concentrations, occurrence of pancreatitis, presence of diabetes, and liver disease were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine (27.5%) of the CF patients were PS. None carried two mutations associated with severe disease. Over one third (34%) had normal or borderline sweat tests; 20 of these 139 patients had pancreatitis (14.3%) but none of the 366 pancreatic insufficient patients had it. Four initially PS patients became pancreatic insufficient: conversion followed several events of pancreatitis in three of them. Nasal potential differences were all pathological in 35 tested PS patients. None had either diabetes or liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of CF patients are PS. All of them carry at least one mild mutation enabling production of a sufficient amount of normal mRNA to maintain exocrine pancreatic function. Pancreatitis occurs only in CF patients who are PS. These patients are at risk of progressing to pancreatic insufficiency.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
23 The mutations DF508, W1282X, G542X, S549R, Q359K/T360K, 405 + 1G, 1717, and N1303K were defined as severe and the mutations 3849 + 10 kb, D1152H, G85E, I1234V, R334W, and 5T were defined as mild/variable. Login to comment
46 of patients W1282X/3849 + 10 kb 15 W1282X/5T 15 DF508/5T 7 DF508/D1152H 6 DF508/3849 + 10 kb 5 W1282X/D1152H 5 W1282X/I1234V 2 3849 + 10 kb/405 + 1G- > A 2 R334W/R334W 2 5T/5T 2 D1152H/D1152H 1 D1152H/5T 1 D1152H/3849 + 10 kb 1 DF508/UKN 13 W1282X/UKN 11 5T/UKN 7 D1152H/UKN 3 1717/UNK 1 G85E/UKN 1 Q359K/T360K/UKN 1 S549R/UKN 1 3849 + 10 kb/UKN 1 UKN/UKN 36 CF, cystic fibrosis; CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator. Login to comment

[hide] Clinical and genetic risk factors for cystic fibro... Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1):52-7. Wilschanski M, Rivlin J, Cohen S, Augarten A, Blau H, Aviram M, Bentur L, Springer C, Vila Y, Branski D, Kerem B, Kerem E
Clinical and genetic risk factors for cystic fibrosis-related liver disease.
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1):52-7., [PMID:9917439]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define the role of possible risk factors for the development of cystic fibrosis (CF)-related liver disease and to analyze the association between liver disease and the different genotypes present in the Israeli CF patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients followed at the seven CF centers in Israel were included in this study. Liver disease was determined by persistently elevated serum liver enzymes and/or bilirubin, and/or significant ultrasonographic changes suggestive of chronic liver disease. The following clinical parameters were evaluated: ethnic origin, age at assessment of liver function, sex, history of meconium ileus, pancreatic function, history of distal intestinal obstruction syndrome, pulmonary function, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mutation analysis. RESULTS: Of the 288 patients screened, 80 (28%) had liver disease. Of the 256 patients with pancreatic insufficiency, 80 (31%) had liver disease compared with none of the 32 patients with pancreatic sufficiency. Genotype-phenotype correlation was performed on 207 patients carrying identified mutations that were previously classified according to phenotype severity. Liver disease was found in 56 (32%) of 173 patients carrying mutations associated with a severe phenotype and in 6 (38%) of 16 patients carrying at least one mutation associated with a variable genotype (G85E and/or 5T allele). None of the 18 patients carrying the 3849+10kb C->T mutation had liver disease. Prevalence of liver disease increased with age. No correlation was found between liver disease and severity of lung disease, nutritional status, history of meconium ileus, or distal intestinal obstruction syndrome. CONCLUSION: CF patients who have pancreatic insufficiency and carry mutations associated with a severe or a variable genotype are at increased risk to develop liver disease.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
117 Classification of Identified Genotype According to Severity of Disease Severe n Milder n Variable n Unclassified n ⌬F508/⌬F508 52 3849 ϩ 10kbC 3 T/⌬F508 7 ⌬F508/G85E 1 S549R/S549R 1 W1282X/W1282X 30 3849 ϩ 10kbC 3 T/405 ϩ 1G3A 3 G85E/G85E 5 S549R/G542X 2 ⌬F508/W1282X 39 3849 ϩ 10 kbC 3 T/W1282X 7 G85E/5T 1 S549R/W1282X 1 ⌬F508/G542X 10 3849 ϩ 10kbC 3 T/G85E 1 ⌬F508/5T 1 ⌬F508/W1089X 1 W1282X/G542X 12 W1282X/5T 2 Y1092X/Y1092X 1 W1282X/N1303K 7 W1282X/5T 1 Q359K-T360K/? Login to comment
123 1 N1303K/N1303K 6 Q359K-T360K/ 4 Q359K-T360K ⌬F508/405 ϩ 1G3A 5 W1282X/1717-1G 3 A 1 G542X/G542X 1 N1303K/1717-1G 3 A 1 Total 173 18 16 36 ARTICLES high prevalence of liver disease. Login to comment

[hide] The D1152H cystic fibrosis mutation in prenatal ca... J Med Screen. 2011;18(4):169-72. Epub 2011 Dec 7. Peleg L, Karpati M, Bronstein S, Berkenstadt M, Frydman M, Yonath H, Pras E
The D1152H cystic fibrosis mutation in prenatal carrier screening, patients and prenatal diagnosis.
J Med Screen. 2011;18(4):169-72. Epub 2011 Dec 7., [PMID:22156145]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of the D1152H mutation in the CFTR gene in normal individuals, in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and in the setting of prenatal diagnosis. SETTING: A database analysis of sequential screening results seen at the Sheba Medical Center, Israel, between 2001 and 2010. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the frequency of D1152H in a large cohort of healthy individuals who were screened as part of a routine prenatal care programme, in individuals referred due to CF-related symptoms and in the setting of prenatal diagnosis. RESULTS: We found one asymptomatic homozygous female and 195 D1152H carriers among 49,940 healthy individuals screened, establishing a carrier rate of 1:255 for this mutation. We detected D1152H in nine of 103 individuals referred due to CF-related symptoms. Four suffered from respiratory symptoms and five from congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD). During this period D1152H was detected in three pregnancies, two of which were aborted. CONCLUSION: The increased frequency of D1152H in individuals referred due to CF-related symptoms compared with healthy individuals included in the CF carrier screening programme (P < 0.001) clearly indicates that it is a disease-causing mutation.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
180 of mutations Group of mutations 2001 Ashkenazi Jews 7 Group A Non-Ashkenazi Jews 11 Group A þ B Georgian Jews 12 Group A þ B þ T360K/Q359K 9.2004-7.2005 Yemenite Jews 12 Groups A þ B þ I1234V Iraqi Jews 12 Groups A þ B þY1092X 8.2005-12.2007 Iraqi Jews 14 Groups A þ B þY1092X þ 3121-1G-A 1.2008-2010 14 mutations for all 14 Groups A þ B þ C Georgian Jews 15 Groups A þ B þ C þ T360K/Q359K Arabic population 19 Groups A þ B þ C þ D Group A: G542X, W1282X, N1303K, F508del, 3849 þ 10KbC-T, 1717-1G-A, D1152H Group B: W1089X, G85E, 405 þ 1G-A, S549R(T-G) Group C: Y1092X, 3121-1G-A, I1234V Group D: 4010delTATT, S549I, 3120 þ 1Kbdel18.6Kb, 2183AA-G, R75X Between 2005-2008 the Iraqi population was screened for an additional mutation 2751 þ 1insT. Login to comment

[hide] Genotyping microarray for the detection of more th... J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):375-87. Schrijver I, Oitmaa E, Metspalu A, Gardner P
Genotyping microarray for the detection of more than 200 CFTR mutations in ethnically diverse populations.
J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):375-87., [PMID:16049310]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF), which is due to mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene, is a common life-shortening disease. Although CF occurs with the highest incidence in Caucasians, it also occurs in other ethnicities with variable frequency. Recent national guidelines suggest that all couples contemplating pregnancy should be informed of molecular screening for CF carrier status for purposes of genetic counseling. Commercially available CF carrier screening panels offer a limited panel of mutations, however, making them insufficiently sensitive for certain groups within an ethnically diverse population. This discrepancy is even more pronounced when such carrier screening panels are used for diagnostic purposes. By means of arrayed primer extension technology, we have designed a genotyping microarray with 204 probe sites for CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutation detection. The arrayed primer extension array, based on a platform technology for disease detection with multiple applications, is a robust, cost-effective, and easily modifiable assay suitable for CF carrier screening and disease detection.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
51 Complete List of Mutations Detectable with the CF APEX Assay CFTR location Amino acid change Nucleotide change 1 E 1 Frameshift 175delC 2 E 2,3 Frameshift del E2, E3 3 E 2 W19C 189 GϾT 4 E 2 Q39X 247 CϾT 5 IVS 2 Possible splicing defect 296 ϩ 12 TϾC 6 E 3 Frameshift 359insT 7 E 3 Frameshift 394delTT 8 E 3 W57X (TAG) 302GϾA 9 E 3 W57X (TGA) 303GϾA 10 E 3 E60X 310GϾT 11 E 3 P67L 332CϾT 12 E 3 R74Q 353GϾA 13 E 3 R75X 355CϾT 14 E 3 G85E 386GϾA 15 E 3 G91R 403GϾA 16 IVS 3 Splicing defect 405 ϩ 1GϾA 17 IVS 3 Possible splicing defect 405 ϩ 3AϾC 18 IVS 3 Splicing defect 406 - 1GϾA 19 E 4 E92X 406GϾT 20 E 4 E92K 406GϾA 21 E 4 Q98R 425AϾG 22 E 4 Q98P 425AϾC 23 E 4 Frameshift 444delA 24 E 4 Frameshift 457TATϾG 25 E 4 R117C 481CϾT 26 E 4 R117H 482GϾA 27 E 4 R117P 482GϾC 28 E 4 R117L 482GϾT 29 E 4 Y122X 498TϾA 30 E 4 Frameshift 574delA 31 E 4 I148T 575TϾC 32 E 4 Splicing defect 621GϾA 33 IVS 4 Splicing defect 621 ϩ 1GϾT 34 IVS 4 Splicing defect 621 ϩ 3AϾG 35 E 5 Frameshift 624delT 36 E 5 Frameshift 663delT 37 E 5 G178R 664GϾA 38 E 5 Q179K 667CϾA 39 IVS 5 Splicing defect 711 ϩ 1GϾT 40 IVS 5 Splicing defect 711 ϩ 1GϾA 41 IVS 5 Splicing defect 712 - 1GϾT 42 E 6a H199Y 727CϾT 43 E 6a P205S 745CϾT 44 E 6a L206W 749TϾG 45 E 6a Q220X 790CϾT 46 E 6b Frameshift 935delA 47 E 6b Frameshift 936delTA 48 E 6b N287Y 991AϾT 49 IVS 6b Splicing defect 1002 - 3TϾG 50 E 7 ⌬F311 3-bp del between nucleotides 1059 and 1069 51 E 7 Frameshift 1078delT 52 E 7 Frameshift 1119delA 53 E 7 G330X 1120GϾT 54 E 7 R334W 1132CϾT 55 E 7 I336K 1139TϾA 56 E 7 T338I 1145CϾT 57 E 7 Frameshift 1154insTC 58 E 7 Frameshift 1161delC 59 E 7 L346P 1169TϾC 60 E 7 R347H 1172GϾA 61 E 7 R347P 1172GϾC 62 E 7 R347L 1172GϾT 63 E 7 R352Q 1187GϾA 64 E 7 Q359K/T360K 1207CϾA and 1211CϾA 65 E 7 S364P 1222TϾC 66 E 8 Frameshift 1259insA 67 E 8 W401X (TAG) 1334GϾA 68 E 8 W401X (TGA) 1335GϾA 69 IVS 8 Splicing changes 1342 - 6 poly(T) variants 5T/7T/9T 70 IVS 8 Splicing defect 1342 - 2AϾC Table 1. Continued CFTR location Amino acid change Nucleotide change 71 E 9 A455E 1496CϾA 72 E 9 Frameshift 1504delG 73 E 10 G480C 1570GϾT 74 E 10 Q493X 1609CϾT 75 E 10 Frameshift 1609delCA 76 E 10 ⌬I507 3-bp del between nucleotides 1648 and 1653 77 E 10 ⌬F508 3-bp del between nucleotides 1652 and 1655 78 E 10 Frameshift 1677delTA 79 E 10 V520F 1690GϾT 80 E 10 C524X 1704CϾA 81 IVS 10 Possible splicing defect 1717 - 8GϾA 82 IVS 10 Splicing defect 1717 - 1GϾA 83 E 11 G542X 1756GϾT 84 E 11 G551D 1784GϾA 85 E 11 Frameshift 1784delG 86 E 11 S549R (AϾC) 1777AϾC 87 E 11 S549I 1778GϾT 88 E 11 S549N 1778GϾA 89 E 11 S549R (TϾG) 1779TϾG 90 E 11 Q552X 1786CϾT 91 E 11 R553X 1789CϾT 92 E 11 R553G 1789CϾG 93 E 11 R553Q 1790GϾA 94 E 11 L558S 1805TϾC 95 E 11 A559T 1807GϾA 96 E 11 R560T 1811GϾC 97 E 11 R560K 1811GϾA 98 IVS 11 Splicing defect 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG 99 IVS 11 Splicing defect 1812 - 1GϾA 100 E 12 Y563D 1819TϾG 101 E 12 Y563N 1819TϾA 102 E 12 Frameshift 1833delT 103 E 12 D572N 1846GϾA 104 E 12 P574H 1853CϾA 105 E 12 T582R 1877CϾG 106 E 12 E585X 1885GϾT 107 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 5GϾT 108 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾA 109 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾC 110 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾT 111 E 13 Frameshift 1924del7 112 E 13 del of 28 amino acids 1949del84 113 E 13 I618T 1985TϾC 114 E 13 Frameshift 2183AAϾG 115 E 13 Frameshift 2043delG 116 E 13 Frameshift 2055del9ϾA 117 E 13 D648V 2075TϾA 118 E 13 Frameshift 2105-2117 del13insAGAA 119 E 13 Frameshift 2108delA 120 E 13 R668C 2134CϾT 121 E 13 Frameshift 2143delT 122 E 13 Frameshift 2176insC 123 E 13 Frameshift 2184delA 124 E 13 Frameshift 2184insA 125 E 13 Q685X 2185CϾT 126 E 13 R709X 2257CϾT 127 E 13 K710X 2260AϾT 128 E 13 Frameshift 2307insA 129 E 13 V754M 2392GϾA 130 E 13 R764X 2422CϾT 131 E 14a W846X 2670GϾA 132 E 14a Frameshift 2734delGinsAT 133 E 14b Frameshift 2766del8 134 IVS 14b Splicing defect 2789 ϩ 5GϾA 135 IVS 14b Splicing defect 2790 - 2AϾG 136 E 15 Q890X 2800CϾT 137 E 15 Frameshift 2869insG 138 E 15 S945L 2966CϾT 139 E 15 Frameshift 2991del32 140 E 16 Splicing defect 3120GϾA interrogation: ACCAACATGTTTTCTTTGATCTTAC 3121-2A3G,T S; 5Ј-ACCAACATGTTTTCTTTGATCTTAC A GTTGTTATTAATTGTGATTGGAGCTATAG-3Ј; CAACAA- TAATTAACACTAACCTCGA 3121-2A3G,T AS. Login to comment
150 Primers Generated to Create Synthetic Templates That Serve As Positive Mutation Controls Primer name Sense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Name Antisense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј 175delC synt F T(15)ATTTTTTTCAGGTGAGAAGGTGGCCA 175delC synt R T(15)ATTTGGAGACAACGCTGGCCTTTTCC W19C synt F T(15)TACCAGACCAATTTTGAGGAAAGGAT W19C synt R T(15)ACAGCTAAAATAAAGAGAGGAGGAAC Q39X synt F T(15)TAAATCCCTTCTGTTGATTCTGCTGA Q39X synt R T(15)AGTATATGTCTGACAATTCCAGGCGC 296 ϩ 12TϾC synt F T(15)CACATTGTTTAGTTGAAGAGAGAAAT 296 ϩ 12TϾC synt R T(15)GCATGAACATACCTTTCCAATTTTTC 359insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATGTTCTAT 359insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAACATCGCCGAAGGGCATTAA E60X synt F T(15)TAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAAAATCCTAA E60X synt R T(15)ATCTATCCCATTCTCTGCAAAAGAAT P67L synt F T(15)TTAAACTCATTAATGCCCTTCGGCGA P67L synt R T(15)AGATTTTTCTTTGAAGCCAGCTCTCT R74Q synt F T(15)AGCGATGTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATG R74Q synt R T(15)TGAAGGGCATTAATGAGTTTAGGATT R75X synt F T(15)TGATGTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATGTT R75X synt R T(15)ACCGAAGGGCATTAATGAGTTTAGGA W57X(TAG) synt F T(15)AGGATAGAGAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAA W57X(TAG) synt R T(15)TATTCTCTGCAAAAGAATAAAAAGTG W57X(TGA) synt F T(15)AGATAGAGAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAAA W57X(TGA) synt R T(15)TCATTCTCTGCAAAAGAATAAAAAGT G91R synt F T(15)AGGGTAAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTC G91R synt R T(15)TTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCATAGAAC 405 ϩ 1GϾA synt F T(15)ATAAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTCATT 405 ϩ 1GϾA synt R T(15)TCCCTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCATAG 405 ϩ 3AϾC synt F T(15)CAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTCATTAT 405 ϩ 3AϾC synt R T(15)GACCCCTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCAT 406 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AGAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTC 406 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAAT E92X synt F T(15)TAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTCT E92X synt R T(15)ACTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAA E92K synt F T(15)AAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTCT E92K synt R T(15)TCTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAA 444delA synt F T(15)GATCATAGCTTCCTATGACCCGGATA 444delA synt R T(15)ATCTTCCCAGTAAGAGAGGCTGTACT 574delA synt F T(15)CTTGGAATGCAGATGAGAATAGCTAT 574delA synt R T(15)AGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGGCTGGG 621GϾA synt F T(15)AGTAATACTTCCTTGCACAGGCCCCA 621GϾA synt R T(15)TTTCTTATAAATCAAACTAAACATAG Q98P synt F T(15)CGCCTCTCTTACTGGGAAGAATCATA Q98P synt R T(15)GGTACTGCTTTGGTGACTTCCTACAA 457TATϾG synt F T(15)GGACCCGGATAACAAGGAGGAACGCT 457TATϾG synt R T(15)CGGAAGCTATGATTCTTCCCAGTAAG I148T synt F T(15)CTGGAATGCAGATGAGAATAGCTATG I148T synt R T(15)GTGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGGCTGG 624delT synt F T(15)CTTAAAGCTGTCAAGCCGTGTTCTAG 624delT synt R T(15)TAAGTCTAAAAGAAAAATGGAAAGTT 663delT synt F T(15)ATGGACAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCC 663delT synt R T(15)CATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACACGGC G178R synt F T(15)AGACAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCCAA G178R synt R T(15)TAATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACACGG Q179K synt F T(15)AAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCCAACAA Q179K synt R T(15)TTCCAATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACA 711 ϩ 5GϾA synt F T(15)ATACCTATTGATTTAATCTTTTAGGC 711 ϩ 5GϾA synt R T(15)TTATACTTCATCAAATTTGTTCAGGT 712 - 1GϾT synt F T(15)TGGACTTGCATTGGCACATTTCGTGT 712 - 1GϾT synt R T(15)TATGGAAAATAAAAGCACAGCAAAAAC H199Y synt F T(15)TATTTCGTGTGGATCGCTCCTTTGCA H199Y synt R T(15)TATGCCAATGCTAGTCCCTGGAAAATA P205S synt F T(15)TCTTTGCAAGTGGCACTCCTCATGGG P205S synt R T(15)TAAGCGATCCACACGAAATGTGCCAAT L206W synt F T(15)GGCAAGTGGCACTCCTCATGGGGCTA L206W synt R T(15)TCAAGGAGCGATCCACACGAAATGTGC Q220X synt F T(15)TAGGCGTCTGCTTTCTGTGGACTTGG Q220X synt R T(15)TATAACAACTCCCAGATTAGCCCCATG 936delTA synt F T(15)AATCCAATCTGTTAAGGCATACTGCT 936delTA synt R T(15)TGATTTTCAATCATTTCTGAGGTAATC 935delA synt F T(15)GAAATATCCAATCTGTTAAGGCATAC 935delA synt R T(15)TATTTCAATCATTTCTGAGGTAATCAC N287Y synt F T(15)TACTTAAGACAGTAAGTTGTTCCAAT N287Y synt R T(15)TATTCAATCATTTTTTCCATTGCTTCT 1002 - 3TϾG synt F T(15)GAGAACAGAACTGAAACTGACTCGGA 1002 - 3TϾG synt R T(15)TCTAAAAAACAATAACAATAAAATTCA 1154insTC syntwt F T(15)ATCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTGCGCAT 1154insTC syntwt R T(15)TTGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTTTCCGGA 1154insTC syntmt F T(15)TCTCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTGCGCAT 1154insTC syntmt R T(15)TAGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTTTCCGGA DF311 mt syntV1 F T(15)CCTTCTTCTCAGGGTTCTTTGTGGTG dF311 mt syntV1 R T(15)GAGAAGAAGGCTGAGCTATTGAAGTATC G330X synt F T(15)TGAATCATCCTCCGGAAAATATTCAC G330X synt R T(15)ATTTGATTAGTGCATAGGGAAGCACA S364P synt F T(15)CCTCTTGGAGCAATAAACAAAATACA S364P synt R T(15)GGTCATACCATGTTTGTACAGCCCAG Q359K/T360K mt synt F T(15)AAAAAATGGTATGACTCTCTTGGAGC Q359K/T360K mt synt R T(15)TTTTTTACAGCCCAGGGAAATTGCCG 1078delT synt F T(15)CTTGTGGTGTTTTTATCTGTGCTTCC 1078delT synt R T(15)CAAGAACCCTGAGAAGAAGAAGGCTG 1119delA synt F T(15)CAAGGAATCATCCTCCGGAAAATATT 1119delA synt R T(15)CTTGATTAGTGCATAGGGAAGCACAG 1161delC synt F T(15)GATTGTTCTGCGCATGGCGGTCACTC 1161delC synt R T(15)TCAGAATGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTT T338I synt F T(15)TCACCATCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTG T338I synt R T(15)ATGAATATTTTCCGGAGGATGATTCC R352Q synt F T(15)AGCAATTTCCCTGGGCTGTACAAACA R352Q synt R T(15)TGAGTGACCGCCATGCGCAGAACAAT L346P synt F T(15)CGCGCATGGCGGTCACTCGGCAATTT L346P synt R T(15)GGAACAATGCAGAATGAGATGGTGGT 1259insA synt F T(15)AAAAAGCAAGAATATAAGACATTGGA 1259insA synt R T(15)TTTTTGTAAGAAATCCTATTTATAAA W401X(TAG)mtsynt F T(15)AGGAGGAGGTCAGAATTTTTAAAAAA W401X(TAG)mtsynt R T(15)TAGAAGGCTGTTACATTCTCCATCAC W401X(TGA) synt F T(15)AGAGGAGGTCAGAATTTTTAAAAAAT W401X(TGA) synt R T(15)TCAGAAGGCTGTTACATTCTCCATCA 1342 - 2AϾC synt F T(15)CGGGATTTGGGGAATTATTTGAGAAA 1342 - 2AϾC synt R T(15)GGTTAAAAAAACACACACACACACAC 1504delG synt F T(15)TGATCCACTGTAGCAGGCAAGGTAGT 1504delG synt R T(15)TCAGCAACCGCCAACAACTGTCCTCT G480C synt F T(15)TGTAAAATTAAGCACAGTGGAAGAAT G480C synt R T(15)ACTCTGAAGGCTCCAGTTCTCCCATA C524X synt F T(15)ACAACTAGAAGAGGTAAGAAACTATG C524X synt R T(15)TCATGCTTTGATGACGCTTCTGTATC V520F synt F T(15)TTCATCAAAGCAAGCCAACTAGAAGA V520F synt R T(15)AGCTTCTGTATCTATATTCATCATAG 1609delCA synt F T(15)TGTTTTCCTGGATTATGCCTGGCACC 1609delCA synt R T(15)CAGAACAGAATGAAATTCTTCCACTG 1717 - 8GϾA synt F T(15)AGTAATAGGACATCTCCAAGTTTGCA 1717 - 8GϾA synt R T(15)TAAAAATAGAAAATTAGAGAGTCACT 1784delG synt F T(15)AGTCAACGAGCAAGAATTTCTTTAGC 1784delG synt R T(15)ACTCCACTCAGTGTGATTCCACCTTC A559T synt F T(15)ACAAGGTGAATAACTAATTATTGGTC A559T synt R T(15)TTAAAGAAATTCTTGCTCGTTGACCT Q552X synt F T(15)TAACGAGCAAGAATTTCTTTAGCAAG Q552X synt R T(15)AACCTCCACTCAGTGTGATTCCACCT S549R(AϾC) synt F T(15)CGTGGAGGTCAACGAGCAAGAATTTC S549R(AϾC) synt R T(15)GCAGTGTGATTCTACCTTCTCCAAGA S549R(TϾG) synt F T(15)GGGAGGTCAACGAGCAAGTATTTC S549R(TϾG) synt R T(15)CCTCAGTGTGATTCCACCTTCTCCAA L558S synt F T(15)CAGCAAGGTGAATAACTAATTATTGG L558S synt R T(15)GAAGAAATTCTCGCTCGTTGACCTCC 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG synt F T(15)GTAAGTAAGGTTACTATCAATCACAC 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG synt R T(15)CATCTCAAGTACATAGGATTCTCTGT 1812 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AAGCAGTATACAAAGATGCTGATTTG 1812 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTAAAAAGAAAATGGAAATTAAATTA D572N synt F T(15)AACTCTCCTTTTGGATACCTAGATGT D572N synt R T(15)TTAATAAATACAAATCAGCATCTTTG P574H synt F T(15)ATTTTGGATACCTAGATGTTTTAACA P574H synt R T(15)TGAGAGTCTAATAAATACAAATCAGC 1833delT synt F T(15)ATTGTATTTATTAGACTCTCCTTTTG 1833delT synt R T(15)CAATCAGCATCTTTGTATACTGCTCT Table 4. Continued Primer name Sense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Name Antisense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Y563D synt F T(15)GACAAAGATGCTGATTTGTATTTATT Y563D synt R T(15)CTACTGCTCTAAAAAGAAAATGGAAA T582R synt F T(15)GAGAAAAAGAAATATTTGAAAGGTAT T582R synt R T(15)CTTAAAACATCTAGGTATCCAAAAGG E585X synt F T(15)TAAATATTTGAAAGGTATGTTCTTTG E585X synt R T(15)ATTTTTCTGTTAAAACATCTAGGTAT 1898 ϩ 5GϾT synt F T(15)TTTCTTTGAATACCTTACTTATATTG 1898 ϩ 5GϾT synt R T(15)AATACCTTTCAAATATTTCTTTTTCT 1924del7 synt F T(15)CAGGATTTTGGTCACTTCTAAAATGG 1924del7 synt R T(15)CTGTTAGCCATCAGTTTACAGACACA 2055del9ϾA synt F T(15)ACATGGGATGTGATTCTTTCGACCAA 2055del9ϾA synt R T(15)TCTAAAGTCTGGCTGTAGATTTTGGA D648V synt F T(15)TTTCTTTCGACCAATTTAGTGCAGAA D648V synt R T(15)ACACATCCCATGAGTTTTGAGCTAAA K710X synt F T(15)TAATTTTCCATTGTGCAAAAGACTCC K710X synt R T(15)ATCGTATAGAGTTGATTGGATTGAGA I618T synt F T(15)CTTTGCATGAAGGTAGCAGCTATTTT I618T synt R T(15)GTTAATATTTTGTCAGCTTTCTTTAA R764X synt F T(15)TGAAGGAGGCAGTCTGTCCTGAACCT R764X synt R T(15)ATGCCTGAAGCGTGGGGCCAGTGCTG Q685X synt F T(15)TAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGGAGAGTT Q685X synt R T(15)ATTTTTTTGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACA R709X synt F T(15)TGAAAATTTTCCATTGTGCAAAAGAC R709X synt R T(15)ATATAGAGTTGATTGGATTGAGAATA V754M synt F T(15)ATGATCAGCACTGGCCCCACGCTTCA V754M synt R T(15)TGCTGATGCGAGGCAGTATCGCCTCT 1949del84 synt F T(15)AAAAATCTACAGCCAGACTTTATCTC 1949del84 synt R T(15)TTTTTAGAAGTGACCAAAATCCTAGT 2108delA synt F T(15)GAATTCAATCCTAACTGAGACCTTAC 2108delA synt R T(15)ATTCTTCTTTCTGCACTAAATTGGTC 2176insC synt F T(15)CCAAAAAAACAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGGAGAG 2176insC synt R T(15)GGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACAGGAGCAT 2184delA synt F T(15)CAAAAAACAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGG 2184delA synt R T(15)GTTTTTTGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACAG 2105-2117 del13 synt F T(15)AAACTGAGACCTTACACCGTTTCTCA 2105-2117 del13 synt R T(15)TTTCTTTCTGCACTAAATTGGTCGAA 2307insA synt F T(15)AAAGAGGATTCTGATGAGCCTTTAGA 2307insA synt R T(15)TTTCGATGCCATTCATTTGTAAGGGA W846X synt F T(15)AAACACATACCTTCGATATATTACTGTCCAC W846X synt R T(15)TCATGTAGTCACTGCTGGTATGCTCT 2734G/AT synt F T(15)TTAATTTTTCTGGCAGAGGTAAGAAT 2734G/AT synt R T(15)TTAAGCACCAAATTAGCACAAAAATT 2766del8 synt F T(15)GGTGGCTCCTTGGAAAGTGAGTATTC 2766del8 synt R T(15)CACCAAAGAAGCAGCCACCTGGAATGG 2790 - 2AϾG synt F T(15)GGCACTCCTCTTCAAGACAAAGGGAA 2790 - 2AϾG synt R T(15)CGTAAAGCAAATAGGAAATCGTTAAT 2991del32 synt F T(15)TTCAACACGTCGAAAGCAGGTACTTT 2991del32 synt R T(15)AAACATTTTGTGGTGTAAAATTTTCG Q890X synt F T(15)TAAGACAAAGGGAATAGTACTCATAG Q890X synt R T(15)AAAGAGGAGTGCTGTAAAGCAAATAG 2869insG synt F T(15)GATTATGTGTTTTACATTTACGTGGG 2869insG synt R T(15)CACGAACTGGTGCTGGTGATAATCAC 3120GϾA synt F T(15)AGTATGTAAAAATAAGTACCGTTAAG 3120GϾA synt R T(15)TTGGATGAAGTCAAATATGGTAAGAG 3121 - 2AϾT synt F T(15)TGTTGTTATTAATTGTGATTGGAGCT 3121 - 2AϾT synt R T(15)AGTAAGATCAAAGAAAACATGTTGGT 3132delTG synt F T(15)TTGATTGGAGCCATAGCAGTTGTCGC 3132delTG synt R T(15)AATTAATAACAACTGTAAGATCAAAG 3271delGG synt F T(15)ATATGACAGTGAATGTGCGATACTCA 3271delGG synt R T(15)ATTCAGATTCCAGTTGTTTGAGTTGC 3171delC synt F T(15)ACCTACATCTTTGTTGCAACAGTGCC 3171delC synt R T(15)AGGTTGTAAAACTGCGACAACTGCTA 3171insC synt F T(15)CCCCTACATCTTTGTTGCTACAGTGC 3171insC synt R T(15)GGGGTTGTAAAACTGCGACAACTGCT 3199del6 synt F T(15)GAGTGGCTTTTATTATGTTGAGAGCATAT 3199del6 synt R T(15)CCACTGGCACTGTTGCAACAAAGATG M1101K synt F T(15)AGAGAATAGAAATGATTTTTGTCATC M1101K synt R T(15)TTTTGGAACCAGCGCAGTGTTGACAG G1061R synt F T(15)CGACTATGGACACTTCGTGCCTTCGG G1061R synt R T(15)GTTTTAAGCTTGTAACAAGATGAGTG R1066L synt F T(15)TTGCCTTCGGACGGCAGCCTTACTTT R1066L synt R T(15)AGAAGTGTCCATAGTCCTTTTAAGCT R1070P synt F T(15)CGCAGCCTTACTTTGAAACTCTGTTC R1070P synt R T(15)GGTCCGAAGGCACGAAGTGTCCATAG L1077P synt F T(15)CGTTCCACAAAGCTCTGAATTTACAT L1077P synt R T(15)GGAGTTTCAAAGTAAGGCTGCCGTCC W1089X synt F T(15)AGTTCTTGTACCTGTCAACACTGCGC W1089X synt R T(15)TAGTTGGCAGTATGTAAATTCAGAGC L1093P synt F T(15)CGTCAACACTGCGCTGGTTCCAAATG L1093P synt R T(15)GGGTACAAGAACCAGTTGGCAGTATG W1098R synt F T(15)CGGTTCCAAATGAGAATAGAAATGAT W1098R synt R T(15)GGCGCAGTGTTGACAGGTACAAGAAC Q1100P synt F T(15)CAATGAGAATAGAAATGATTTTTGTC Q1100P synt R T(15)GGGAACCAGCGCAGTGTTGACAGGTA D1152H synt F T(15)CATGTGGATAGCTTGGTAAGTCTTAT D1152H synt R T(15)GTATGCTGGAGTTTACAGCCCACTGC R1158X synt F T(15)TGATCTGTGAGCCGAGTCTTTAAGTT R1158X synt R T(15)ACATCTGAAATAAAAATAACAACATT S1196X synt F T(15)GACACGTGAAGAAAGATGACATCTGG S1196X synt R T(15)CAATTCTCAATAATCATAACTTTCGA 3732delA synt F T(15)GGAGATGACATCTGGCCCTCAGGGGG 3732delA synt R T(15)CTCCTTCACGTGTGAATTCTCAATAA 3791delC synt F T(15)AAGAAGGTGGAAATGCCATATTAGAG 3791delC synt R T(15)TTGTATTTTGCTGTGAGATCTTTGAC 3821delT synt F T(15)ATTCCTTCTCAATAAGTCCTGGCCAG 3821delT synt R T(15)GAATGTTCTCTAATATGGCATTTCCA Q1238X synt F T(15)TAGAGGGTGAGATTTGAACACTGCTT Q1238X synt R T(15)AGCCAGGACTTATTGAGAAGGAAATG S1255X (ex19)synt F T(15)GTCTGGCCCTCAGGGGGCCAAATGAC S1255X (ex19) synt R T(15)CGTCATCTTTCTTCACGTGTGAATTC S1255X;L synt F T(15)AAGCTTTTTTGAGACTACTGAACACT S1255X;L synt R T(15)TATAACAAAGTAATCTTCCCTGATCC 3849 ϩ 4AϾG synt F T(15)GGATTTGAACACTGCTTGCTTTGTTA 3849 ϩ 4AϾG synt R T(15)CCACCCTCTGGCCAGGACTTATTGAG 3850 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AGTGGGCCTCTTGGGAAGAACTGGAT 3850 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTATAAGGTAAAAGTGATGGGATCAC 3905insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTGAGACTACTGAACACTGAA 3905insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAAGCTGATAACAAAGTACTCT 3876delA synt F T(15)CGGGAAGAGTACTTTGTTATCAGCTT 3876delA synt R T(15)CGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAAGAGGCCCA G1244V synt F T(15)TAAGAACTGGATCAGGGAAGAGTACT G1244V synt R T(15)ACCAAGAGGCCCACCTATAAGGTAAA G1249E synt F T(15)AGAAGAGTACTTTGTTATCAGCTTTT G1249E synt R T(15)TCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAAGAGGCC S1251N synt F T(15)ATACTTTGTTATCAGCTTTTTTGAGACTACTG S1251N synt R T(15)TTCTTCCCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAA S1252P synt F T(15)CCTTTGTTATCAGCTTTTTTGAGACT S1252P synt R T(15)GACTCTTCCCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCC D1270N synt F T(15)AATGGTGTGTCTTGGGATTCAATAAC D1270N synt R T(15)TGATCTGGATTTCTCCTTCAGTGTTC W1282R synt F T(15)CGGAGGAAAGCCTTTGGAGTGATACC W1282R synt R T(15)GCTGTTGCAAAGTTATTGAATCCCAA R1283K synt F T(15)AGAAAGCCTTTGGAGTGATACCACAG R1283K synt R T(15)TTCCACTGTTGCAAAGTTATTGAATC 4005 ϩ 1GϾA synt F T(15)ATGAGCAAAAGGACTTAGCCAGAAAA 4005 ϩ 1GϾA synt R T(15)TCTGTGGTATCACTCCAAAGGCTTTC 4010del4 synt F T(15)GTATTTTTTCTGGAACATTTAGAAAAAACTTGG 4010del4 synt R T(15)AAAATACTTTCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAA 4016insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTCTGGAACATTTAGAAAAAACTTGG 4016insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAATAAATACTTTCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGA CFTRdele21 synt F T(15)TAGGTAAGGCTGCTAACTGAAATGAT CFTRdele21 synt R T(15)CCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAAGAAAGTATG 4382delA synt F T(15)GAGAGAACAAAGTGCGGCAGTACGAT 4382delA synt R T(15)CTCTATGACCTATGGAAATGGCTGTT Bold, mutation allele of interest; bold and italicized, modified nucleotide. Login to comment

[hide] CFTR haplotype analysis reveals genetic heterogene... Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jun;56(6):1359-66. Rave-Harel N, Madgar I, Goshen R, Nissim-Rafinia M, Ziadni A, Rahat A, Chiba O, Kalman YM, Brautbar C, Levinson D, et al.
CFTR haplotype analysis reveals genetic heterogeneity in the etiology of congenital bilateral aplasia of the vas deferens.
Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jun;56(6):1359-66., [PMID:7539210]

Abstract [show]
Congenital bilateral aplasia of the vas deferens (CBAVD) was suggested to be a mild form of cystic fibrosis (CF). Mutation analysis of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in males with CBAVD revealed that in some males CBAVD is caused by two defective CFTR alleles. The genetic basis of CBAVD in the other males and its association with CF remained unclear. We undertook this study to test the hypothesis of commonality of CBAVD and CF by haplotype analysis, in the CFTR locus, of males suffering from CBAVD and of their families. According to the hypothesis of commonality of CBAVD and CF, two brothers with CBAVD are expected to carry the same two CFTR alleles, while their fertile brothers are expected to carry at least one different allele. Eleven families were studied, of which two families, with unidentified CFTR mutations, did not support this hypothesis. In these families two brothers with CBAVD inherited different CFTR alleles. Their fertile brothers inherited the same CFTR alleles as their brothers with CBAVD. These results provide evidence for genetic heterogeneity in CBAVD. Though in some families CBAVD is associated with two CFTR mutations, we suggest that in others it is caused by other mechanisms, such as mutations at other loci or homozygosity or heterozygosity for partially penetrant CFTR mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
40 1991a); D1152H (W. E. Highsmith, personal communication); 405+1G>A (Dork et al. 1993); Q359K/ T360K (Shoshani et al. Login to comment
41 1992b); and D1270H (Anguiano et al. 1992). Login to comment

[hide] Mutation analysis in 600 French cystic fibrosis pa... J Med Genet. 1994 Jul;31(7):541-4. Chevalier-Porst F, Bonardot AM, Gilly R, Chazalette JP, Mathieu M, Bozon D
Mutation analysis in 600 French cystic fibrosis patients.
J Med Genet. 1994 Jul;31(7):541-4., [PMID:7525963]

Abstract [show]
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene of 600 unrelated cystic fibrosis (CF) patients living in France (excluding Brittany) was screened for 105 different mutations. This analysis resulted in the identification of 86% of the CF alleles and complete genotyping of 76% of the patients. The most frequent mutations in this population after delta F508 (69% of the CF chromosomes) are G542X (3.3%), N1303K (1.8%), W1282X (1.5%), 1717-1G-->A (1.3%), 2184delA + 2183 A-->G (0.9%), and R553X (0.8%).

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
21 Among the 104 other CFTR mutations tested on the 373 non-AF508 CF chromosomes, none of the following 58 mutations were found: G91R, 435 insA, 444delA, D11OH, 556delA, 557delT, R297Q, 1154insTC, R347L, R352Q, Q359K/T360K, 1221delCT, G480C, Q493R, V520F, C524X, 1706dell7, S549R (A-C), S549N, S549I, G551S, 1784delG, Q552X, L558S, A559T, R560T, R560K, Y563N, P574H, 2307insA, 2522insC, 2556insAT, E827X, Q890X, Y913C, 2991de132 (Dork et al, personal communication), L967S, 3320ins5, 3359delCT, H1085R, R1158X, 3662delA, 3667del4, 3667ins4, 3732delA, 3737delA, W1204X, 3750delAG, I 1234V, Q1238X, 3850- 3T-+G, 3860ins31, S1255X, 3898insC, D1270N, R1283M, F1286S, 4005 + I G-A. Forty-six other mutations were found on at Distribution of CFTR mutations found in our sample ofpopulation (1200 CF chromosomes) Mutations tested No of CF chromosomes Haplotypes Method with the mutation XV2C-KM19 (% of total CF alleles) Exon 3: G85E 4 (033) 3C HinfI/ASO394delTT 2 2B PAGEExon 4: R117H 1 B ASOY122X 2 2C MseI/sequenceI148T 1 B ASO621+IG-J* 1 B MseIIASOExon 5: 711+1G--T 8(07) 8A ASOExon 7: AF311 1 C PAGE/sequencelO78delT 5 (0-42) 5C PAGE/ASOR334W 5 (0-42) 2A,2C,ID MspIlASOR347P 5 (042) 5A CfoI/NcoIR347H 1 Cfol/sequenceExon 9: A455E 1 B ASOExon 10: S492F I C DdeI/sequenceQ493X 1 D ASOl609deICA 1 C PAGE/Ddel/sequenceA1507 3 (025) 3D PAGE/ASOAF508 827 (69) 794B,30D,2C,IA PAGEl677delTA 1 A PAGE/sequenceExon I11: 1717-IG--.A 16(1-3) 14B Modified primers + AvaIIG542X 40 (3-3) 29B,5D,2A Modified primers + BstNiS549R(T--*G) 2 2B ASOG551D 3 (025) 3B HincII/Sau3AR553X 10(0-8) 6A,1B,2C,ID Hincll/sequenceExon 12: 1898+IG--A 1 C ASO1898+ IG-C 2 IC ASOExon 13: l9l8deIGC 1 A PAGE/sequence1949de184 I C PAGE/sequenceG628R(G-+A) 2 2A Sequence2118de14 I c PAGE/sequence2143de1T 1 B PAGE/modified primers2184de1A+2183A--*G 11 (0-9) lIB PAGE/ASO2184de1A 1 ASOK710X 3 (025) IC XmnI2372de18 1 B PAGE/sequenceExon 15: S945L 1 C TaqlExon 17b:L1065P I MnlIL1077P 1 A ASOY1092X 3 (025) 2C,IA Rsal/ASOExon 19: RI1162X 6 (0-5) 5C,IA DdeI/ASO3659delC 3 (025) 3C ASOExon 20: G1244E 2 2A MboIIS1251N 2 2C RsaI3905insT 4 (0-33) 4C PAGE/ASOW1282X 18 (105) 15B,1D MnlI/ASOR1283K 1 C Mnll/sequenceExon 21: N1303K 22 (1-8) 18B,lA,ID Modified primers+BstNI 47 mutations 1031 (85 9) least one CF chromosome (table): 21 of them are very rare as they were found on only one CF chromosome in our population. Login to comment

[hide] Extended haplotype analysis of cystic fibrosis mut... Hum Genet. 1993 Oct 1;92(3):289-95. Sereth H, Shoshani T, Bashan N, Kerem BS
Extended haplotype analysis of cystic fibrosis mutations and its implications for the selective advantage hypothesis.
Hum Genet. 1993 Oct 1;92(3):289-95., [PMID:7691712]

Abstract [show]
The major cystic fibrosis (CF) mutation, delta F508, is associated with one haplotype (B) determined by the two polymorphic markers, XV2C and KM19. This haplotype is rare (15%) among non-CF chromosomes. Its frequency among non-delta F508 CF chromosomes is 50% with variation between populations. One hypothesis for the high frequency of CF haplotype B chromosomes suggests that there was a selective advantage for CF mutations on this specific "background" as a result of epistatic selection at other closely linked loci. Since the XV2C and KM19 markers are located 200 kb 5' to the CF gene and span only 60 kb, an extended haplotype analysis was needed to test this hypothesis. Haplotypes were determined for 183 CF and 120 non-CF Israeli chromosomes at the XV2C and KM19 loci and at three intragenic polymorphic sites (GATT in intron 6A, TUB18 in intron 19, and 24M in exon 24). Among the studied chromosomes the frequency of non-delta F508 CF chromosomes associated with haplotype B was 70% (88% among Ashkenazi CF chromosomes). Nine mutations (delta F508, W1282X, G542X, N1303K, 3849 + 10 kb C-->T, Q359K/T360K, S549I, S549R, and 1717-1G-->A) were identified among the studied chromosomes. These mutations accounted for 96% of CF chromosomes of Ashkenazi origin. Haplotype B was associated with seven of these (delta F508, W1282X, G542X, N1303K, Q359K/T360K, S549R, and 1717-1G-->A). The extended haplotype analysis revealed that in five of the seven mutations associated with the haplotype B, 97% of the chromosomes shared the same intragenic haplotype, 212. The variation found in 3% of the chromosomes was only in the GATT repeat. Two mutations, W1282X and 1717-1G-->A, were associated with a completely different intragenic haplotype, 121. The results of this study indicate that grouping of CF chromosome by haplotype analysis spanning a small extragenic region might not be sufficient. In addition, the results of the extended haplotype analysis indicate that all the studied CF chromosomes that carry the same mutation derived from the same origin. Furthermore, the results indicate that the majority of the CF mutations are associated with the same extended haplotype, supporting the selective advantage hypothesis.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
44 The Q359K/T360K mutation was detected by digestion with the Rsal and Na/IIl restriction endonucleases (Shoshani et al. 1992b). Login to comment
51 Distribution of CF and normal chromosomes associated with the extended extra- and intragenic DNA polymorphic markers a 291 Mutation Haplotype 2.3A GATT TUB 18 JG2E1 24M Ethnic origin Ash- Non- Arab kena- Ash- zim kenazim AF508 Total: B 2 1 2 12 19 12 B 1 1 2 1 B (2) 1 2 4 B (2) (1) 2 1 B 2 (1) (2) 2 B 2 (1) 2 1 (B) 2 (1) 2 1 D 2 1 2 1 22 19 13 W1282X Total: B 1 2 1 40 B (1) 2 1 5 B 1 (2) 1 1 B 1 (2) (1) 3 B (1) (2) (1) 3 B 2 2 1 1 53 1 2 Q359K/T360K b Total: B 2 1 2 5 B (2) 1 2 1 B 1 1 2 1 7 N1303K Total: B 2 1 2 2 B 2 1 (2) 2 (B) (2) (1) (2) 1 3 2 G542X B 2 1 2 6 1 2 $549R B 2 1 2 2 1717-1G---)A B 1 2 1 1 $549I A 2 1 2 2 3849+10kb C--*T C 1 1 2 4 1 (C) 1 1 2 1 C 2 1 2 1 Total: 6 1 Unknown B 2 1 2 1 3 2 B (2) 1 2 1 B (2) (1) (2) 1 B 1 1 2 3 A 1 1 2 1 5 1 (A) (1) 1 2 1 C 1 1 2 2 8 2 (C) 1 (1) (2) 1 C 2 1 2 2 2 D 1 2 1 1 D 2 1 2 3 Total: 5 21 14 Total CF: 95 50 38 Table 2 (continued) Mutation Haplotype Ethnic origin 2.3A GATT TUBI8 24M Ash- Non- Arab JG2EI kena- Ash- zim kenazim Normal Total: B 2 1 2 2 1 1 B 1 l 2 3 1 B l 2 1 1 A 2 1 2 7 2 2 A I 1 2 12 8 6 A 2 2 l 1 A 1 2 2 1 A 1 2 1 I C 2 1 2 3 1 C 1 1 2 20 13 1I C 2 1 I 1 C 2 2 2 1 C 1 2 1 3 2 D 2 I 2 1 1 D 1 1 2 2 1 D 2 1 I I D 2 2 1 1 D 1 2 1 2 5 2 57 37 26 Alleles that could not be phased are shown in parentheses b All the chromosomes carrying the Q359K/T360K mutation are of Georgian origin in the respective flanking introns of the CF gene (Kerem et al. 1990; Zielenski et al. 1991). Login to comment
67 Eight additional mutations: WI282X, G542X, N1303K, 3849+10kb C---)T, Q359K/T360K, $549I, $549R, and 1717-1G-->A were identified among the studied chromosomes and have all been described elsewhere (Vidaud et al. 1990; Kerem et al. 1990; Osborne et al. 1991; Tsui 1992; Shoshani et al. 1992a, b). Login to comment
75 This extended haplotype analysis revealed that 75 of 77 (97%) of the chromosomes carrying five of the seven mutations associated with haplotype B, (F508, G542X, N1303K, Q359K/T360K, $549R) share the same intragenic haplotype, 212. Login to comment
84 The studied chromosomes included all the chromosomes carrying the Q359K/T360K, G542X, $549R, N1303K, and 1717-1G---~A mutations, 12 chromosomes carrying the W1282X mutations, and 14 chromosomes carrying the AF508 mutation. Login to comment
87 The three chromosomes (one with the W1282X mutation, one with the Q359K/T360K mutation, and one with the AF508 mutation) associated with a different allele at the repeat site were identical at the 14a polymorphic site to the rest of the chromosomes carrying the same mutation. Login to comment

[hide] PGD for cystic fibrosis patients and couples at ri... Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 May;26(5):420-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Jan 29. Rechitsky S, Verlinsky O, Kuliev A
PGD for cystic fibrosis patients and couples at risk of an additional genetic disorder combined with 24-chromosome aneuploidy testing.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 May;26(5):420-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Jan 29., [PMID:23523379]

Abstract [show]
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for inherited disorders is presently applied for more than 300 different conditions. The most frequent PGD indication is cystic fibrosis (CF), the largest series of which is reviewed here, totalling 404 PGD cycles. This involved testing for 52 different CFTR mutations with almost half of the cases (195/404 cycles) performed for DeltaF508 mutation, one-quarter (103/404 cycles) for six other frequent mutations and only a few for the remaining 45 CFTR mutations. There were 44 PGD cycles performed for 25 CF-affected homozygous or double-heterozygous CF patients (18 male and seven female partners), which involved testing simultaneously for three mutations, resulting in birth of 13 healthy CF-free children and no misdiagnosis. PGD was also performed for six couples at a combined risk of producing offspring with CF and another genetic disorder. Concomitant testing for CFTR and other mutations resulted in birth of six healthy children, free of both CF and another genetic disorder in all but one cycle. A total of 96 PGD cycles for CF were performed with simultaneous aneuploidy testing, including microarray-based 24-chromosome analysis, as a comprehensive PGD for two or more conditions in the same biopsy material.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
41 Mutation Region Legacy name cDNA name Protein name # of Patient Number of cycles Number of transfers Number of embryos transferred Pregnancy Birth 125G/C c.-8G>C NA Promoter 1 2 2 2 1 (1) 0 E60X c.178G>T p.Glu60X Exon 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 G85E c.254G>A p.Gly85Glu Exon 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 R75Q c.224G>A p.Arg75Gln Exon 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 R75X c.223C>T p.Arg75X Exon 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 A120T c.358G>A p.Ala120Thr Exon 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 R117C c.349C>T p.Arg117Cys Exon 4 2 6 3 5 1 1 R117H c.350G>A p.Arg117His Exon 4 14 22 19 38 8 6 621+1G-T c.489 &#b1; 1G>T - Intron 4 4 7 4 6 2 1 852del22 c.720_741 p.Gly241GlufsX13 Exon 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 L206W c.617T>G p.Leu206Trp Exon 6 1 2 1 2 0 0 A349V c.1046C>T p.Ala349Val Exon 8 1 2 2 4 2 4 1078delT c.948delT p.Phe316LeufsX12 Exon 8 1 1 1 1 1 0 1154ins-TC c.1022_1023insTC p.Phe342HisfsX28 Exon 8 1 2 1 2 0 0 Q359K/T360K c. Login to comment
42 [1075C>A; 1079C>A] p.[Gln359Lys; Thr360Lys] Exon 8 1 1 1 4 1 1 R297Q c.890G>A p.Arg297Gln Exon 8 1 1 1 2 0 0 R347P c.1040G>C p.Arg347Pro Exon 8 3 5 2 4 1 1 T338I c.1013C>T p.Thr338Ile Exon 8 1 1 1 2 1 1 DF508 c.1521_1523delCTT p.Phe508del Exon 11 130 195 172 345 88 (4) 92 DI507 c.1519_1521delATC p.Ile507del Exon 11 1 5 5 11 2 1 Q493R c.1478A>G p.Gln493Arg Exon 11 5 5 2 2 2 2 1717-1G-A c.1585-1G>A - Intron 11 6 10 9 18 6 8 G542X c.1624G>T p.Gly542X Exon 12 14 17 15 34 10 10 G551S c.1651G>A p.Gly551Ser Exon 12 1 1 1 2 1 1 G551D c.1652G>A p.Gly551Asp Exon 12 12 22 19 33 7 8 I556V c.1666A>G p.Ile556Val Exon 12 1 2 2 4 1 1 R553X c.1657C>T p.Arg553X Exon 12 3 4 2 4 0 0 R560T c.1679G>C p.Arg560Thr Exon 12 1 1 1 2 1 2 1898+1G-A c.1766 &#b1; 1G>A - Intron 13 1 1 1 2 1 1 2184delA c.2052delA p.Lys684AsnfsX38 Exon 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 G622D c.1865G>A p.Gly622Asp Exon 14 1 1 1 3 0 0 N703S c.2108A>G p.Asn703Ser Exon 14 1 2 2 3 2 2 S737F c.2210C>T p.Ser737Phe Exon 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 2622+1G-A c.2490 &#b1; 1G>A - Intron 14 1 5 5 13 1 1 2752-26A-G c.2620-26A>G - Intron 15 1 2 2 4 0 0 2789+5G-A c.2657 &#b1; 5G>A - Intron 16 3 5 4 8 0 0 3120G-A c.2988G>A - Exon 18 2 2 1 2 1 0 3067-72del c.3067_3072del p.Ile1023_Val1024del Exon 19 1 1 1 1 0 0 I1027T c.3080T>C p.Ile1027Thr Exon 19 1 1 1 1 0 0 L997F c.2991G>C p.Leu997Phe Exon 19 1 2 2 4 1 (1) 0 M1028R c.3083T>G p.Met1028Arg Exon 19 1 1 1 2 1 2 F1052V c.3154T>G p.Phe1052Val Exon 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 Y1092X c.3276C>A p.Tyr1092X Exon 20 1 2 1 2 1 1 A1136T c.3406G>A p.Ala1136Thr Exon 21 1 2 1 2 1 0 D1152H c.3454G>C p.Asp1152His Exon 21 3 7 7 15 1 1 3659 del C c.3528delC p.Lys1177SerfsX15 Exon 22 2 4 3 7 3 3 R1162X c.3484C>T p.Arg1162X Exon 22 1 3 2 5 2 2 S1235R c.3705T>G p.Ser1235Arg Exon 22 2 3 3 5 2 1 3849+10kbC>T c.3717 &#b1; 12191C>T - Intron 22 2 4 4 5 0 0 W1282X c.3846G>A p.Trp1282X Exon 23 15 20 20 42 11 11 N1303K c.3909C>G p.Asn1303Lys Exon 24 9 12 11 24 4 5 Q1352H c.4056G>C p.Gln1352His Exon 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 265 404 345 685 172 (6a ) 175 Values are n unless otherwise stated. Login to comment

[hide] Defining the disease liability of variants in the ... Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1160-7. doi: 10.1038/ng.2745. Epub 2013 Aug 25. Sosnay PR, Siklosi KR, Van Goor F, Kaniecki K, Yu H, Sharma N, Ramalho AS, Amaral MD, Dorfman R, Zielenski J, Masica DL, Karchin R, Millen L, Thomas PJ, Patrinos GP, Corey M, Lewis MH, Rommens JM, Castellani C, Penland CM, Cutting GR
Defining the disease liability of variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene.
Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1160-7. doi: 10.1038/ng.2745. Epub 2013 Aug 25., [PMID:23974870]

Abstract [show]
Allelic heterogeneity in disease-causing genes presents a substantial challenge to the translation of genomic variation into clinical practice. Few of the almost 2,000 variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene CFTR have empirical evidence that they cause cystic fibrosis. To address this gap, we collected both genotype and phenotype data for 39,696 individuals with cystic fibrosis in registries and clinics in North America and Europe. In these individuals, 159 CFTR variants had an allele frequency of l0.01%. These variants were evaluated for both clinical severity and functional consequence, with 127 (80%) meeting both clinical and functional criteria consistent with disease. Assessment of disease penetrance in 2,188 fathers of individuals with cystic fibrosis enabled assignment of 12 of the remaining 32 variants as neutral, whereas the other 20 variants remained of indeterminate effect. This study illustrates that sourcing data directly from well-phenotyped subjects can address the gap in our ability to interpret clinically relevant genomic variation.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
119 The remaining three variants (p.[Gln359Lys; Thr360Lys], p.Leu558Ser and p.Arg1070Gln) exhibited processing greater than 10% of that of wild-type CFTR and were not functionally classified. Login to comment
137 In addition to these ten variants, c.1210-12(7) (legacy name 7T) had already been reported to be non-penetrant48 and was identified as a second variant in numerous fathers, and a twelfth variant, p.Ile1027Thr, was deemed 159 variants ࣙ0.01% frequency in CFTR2 127 variants meet clinical and functional criteria Clinical and functional analysis 13 variants meet neither criteria 14 variants 5 variants 7 variants 6 variants Evidence of non-penetrance No evidence of non-penetrance 19 variants meet clinical or functional criteria 127 variants are CF causing 12 variants are non CF causing 20 variants are indeterminate p.Arg117HisߤC p.Arg75Gln p.Gly576Alaߤ p.Arg668Cys ߤ p.Met470Val C p.IIe1027Thr ߤC p.Val754Met ߤC p.IIe148Thr ߤC p.Arg31Cys C p.Ser1235Arg ߤ p.Leu997Phe ߤ p.Arg1162Leu p.Leu227Arg F p.Gln525* F p.Leu558SerC p.Asp614Gly C c.2657+2_2657+3insA C c.1418delG F c.1210-12(7) ߤ p.Arg1070Gln C p.Asp1270Asn ߤC p.[Gln359Lys; Thr360Lys] p.Gly1069Argߤ p.Asp1152His p.Phe1052Val c.1210-12(5) p.Arg74Trpߤ p.IIe1234Val ߤC p.Arg1070Trp ߤF p.Ser977Phe F p.Asp579Gly C p.Tyr569Asp F Penetrance analysis Figure 4ߒ Assignment of disease liability to the 159 most frequent CFTR variants using three criteria. Login to comment
183 Therefore, we are more confident that more frequent variants such as p.Gly551Asp are fully penetrant than we are for variants such as p.[Gln359Lys; Thr360Lys], p.Phe1052Val and p.Gly1069Arg, which were seen with an allele frequency of less than 0.0002. Login to comment

[hide] Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis us... Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209. Baker MW, Atkins AE, Cordovado SK, Hendrix M, Earley MC, Farrell PM
Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study.
Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209., [PMID:25674778]

Abstract [show]
Purpose:Many regions have implemented newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) using a limited panel of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) mutations after immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) analysis. We sought to assess the feasibility of further improving the screening using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology.Methods:An NGS assay was used to detect 162 CFTR mutations/variants characterized by the CFTR2 project. We used 67 dried blood spots (DBSs) containing 48 distinct CFTR mutations to validate the assay. NGS assay was retrospectively performed on 165 CF screen-positive samples with one CFTR mutation.Results:The NGS assay was successfully performed using DNA isolated from DBSs, and it correctly detected all CFTR mutations in the validation. Among 165 screen-positive infants with one CFTR mutation, no additional disease-causing mutation was identified in 151 samples consistent with normal sweat tests. Five infants had a CF-causing mutation that was not included in this panel, and nine with two CF-causing mutations were identified.Conclusion:The NGS assay was 100% concordant with traditional methods. Retrospective analysis results indicate an IRT/NGS screening algorithm would enable high sensitivity, better specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). This study lays the foundation for prospective studies and for introducing NGS in NBS laboratories.Genet Med advance online publication 12 February 2015Genetics in Medicine (2015); doi:10.1038/gim.2014.209.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
32 [1075C>A;1079C>A] (Q359K/T360K) - - - Mutations that do not cause CF when combined with another CF-causing mutation c.1727G>C (G576A) c.3485G>T (R1162L) c.224G>A (R75Q) - - c.3080T>C (I1027T) c.91C>T (R31C) c.3705T>G (S1235R) - - c.2991G>C (L997F) c.2002C>T (R668C) c.2260G>A (V754M) - - Mutations/variants that were validated in this study are in bold. CF, cystic fibrosis. Table 1ߒContinued (http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/) and legacy mutation nomenclature (http://www.cftr2.org/browse.php). Login to comment

[hide] The improvement of the best practice guidelines fo... Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99. Girardet A, Viart V, Plaza S, Daina G, De Rycke M, Des Georges M, Fiorentino F, Harton G, Ishmukhametova A, Navarro J, Raynal C, Renwick P, Saguet F, Schwarz M, SenGupta S, Tzetis M, Roux AF, Claustres M
The improvement of the best practice guidelines for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: toward an international consensus.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99., [PMID:26014425]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorders, giving couples the opportunity to conceive unaffected children without having to consider termination of pregnancy. However, there are no available standardized protocols, so that each center has to develop its own diagnostic strategies and procedures. Furthermore, reproductive decisions are complicated by the diversity of disease-causing variants in the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene and the complexity of correlations between genotypes and associated phenotypes, so that attitudes and practices toward the risks for future offspring can vary greatly between countries. On behalf of the EuroGentest Network, eighteen experts in PGD and/or molecular diagnosis of CF from seven countries attended a workshop held in Montpellier, France, on 14 December 2011. Building on the best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD established by ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology), the goal of this meeting was to formulate specific guidelines for CF-PGD in order to contribute to a better harmonization of practices across Europe. Different topics were covered including variant nomenclature, inclusion criteria, genetic counseling, PGD strategy and reporting of results. The recommendations are summarized here, and updated information on the clinical significance of CFTR variants and associated phenotypes is presented.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 27 May 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.99.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
85 (Gly1323_Val1415del) 4209TGTT4AA c.4077_4080delTGTTinsAA 4382delA c.4251delA p.Glu1418Argfs*14 Examples of common variants with varying or indetermined clinical consequencesb R117H c.350G4A p.Arg117His L227R c.680 T4G p.Leu227Arg Q359K/T360K c. Login to comment
87 [Gln359Lys; Thr360Lys] L558S c.1673 T4C p.Leu558Ser Y569D c.1705 T4G p.Tyr569Asp D579G c.1736 A4G p.Asp579Gly D614G c.1841 A4G p.Asp614Gly S977F c.2930C4T p.Ser977Phe F1052V c.3154 T4G p.Phe1052Val G1069R c.3205G4A p.Gly1069Arg R1070Q c.3209G4A p.Arg1070Gln D1152H c.3454G4C p.Asp1152His I1234V c.3700 A4G p.Ile1234Val 5T c.1210 - 12[5] Examples of common not CF-causing variantsc R31C c.91C4T p.Arg31Cys R74W c.220C4T p.Arg74Trp R75Q c.224G4A p.Arg75Gln I148T c.443 T4C p.Ile148Thr M470V c.1408 A4G p.Met470Val G576A c.1727G4C p.Gly576Ala R668C c.2002C4T p.Arg668Cys V754M c.2260G4A p.Val754Met L997F c.2991G4C p.Leu997Phe I1027T c.3080 T4C p.Ile1027Thr R1070W c.3208C4T p.Arg1070Trp R1162L c.3485G4T p.Arg1162Leu Table 1 (Continued) HGVS nomenclature Legacy name cDNA nucleotide name Protein name S1235R c.3705 T4G p.Ser1235Arg D1270N c.3808G4A p.Asp1270Asn 7T c.1210-12[7] Abbreviation: HGVS, Human Genome Variation Society. Login to comment