ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser
| ClinVar: |
c.3061C>T
,
p.Pro1021Ser
?
, not provided
|
| CF databases: |
c.3061C>G
,
p.Pro1021Ala
(CFTR1)
D
,
c.3061C>T , p.Pro1021Ser (CFTR1) D , The P1021S mutation has been detected by SSCA and direct sequencing. The mutation was identified in a Spanish man with CBAVD carrying a [delta]F508 on the other chromosome. |
| Predicted by SNAP2: | A: N (57%), C: N (53%), D: D (80%), E: D (85%), F: D (66%), G: D (63%), H: D (80%), I: D (59%), K: D (85%), L: D (59%), M: D (80%), N: D (75%), Q: D (80%), R: D (91%), S: D (59%), T: D (66%), V: N (57%), W: D (85%), Y: D (80%), |
| Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: D, C: D, D: D, E: D, F: D, G: D, H: D, I: D, K: D, L: D, M: D, N: D, Q: D, R: D, S: D, T: D, V: D, W: D, Y: D, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Heterogeneity for mutations in the CFTR gene and c... Hum Reprod. 2000 Jul;15(7):1476-83. Casals T, Bassas L, Egozcue S, Ramos MD, Gimenez J, Segura A, Garcia F, Carrera M, Larriba S, Sarquella J, Estivill X
Heterogeneity for mutations in the CFTR gene and clinical correlations in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens.
Hum Reprod. 2000 Jul;15(7):1476-83., [PMID:10875853]
Abstract [show]
Congenital absence of the vas deferens (CAVD) is a heterogeneous disorder, largely due to mutations in the cystic fibrosis (CFTR) gene. Patients with unilateral absence of the vas deferens (CUAVD) and patients with CAVD in association with renal agenesis appear to have a different aetiology to those with isolated CAVD. We have studied 134 Spanish CAVD patients [110 congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and 24 CUAVD], 16 of whom (six CBAVD, 10 CUAVD) had additional renal anomalies. Forty-two different CFTR mutations were identified, seven of them being novel. Some 45% of the CFTR mutations were specific to CAVD, and were not found in patients with cystic fibrosis or in the general Spanish population. CFTR mutations were detected in 85% of CBAVD patients and in 38% of those with CUAVD. Among those patients with renal anomalies, 31% carried one CFTR mutation. Anomalies in seminal vesicles and ejaculatory ducts were common in patients with CAVD. The prevalence of cryptorchidism and inguinal hernia appeared to be increased in CAVD patients, as well as nasal pathology and frequent respiratory infections. This study confirms the molecular heterogeneity of CFTR mutations in CAVD, and emphasizes the importance of an extensive CFTR analysis in these patients. In contrast with previous studies, this report suggests that CFTR might have a role in urogenital anomalies.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
67 The abnormally migrating fragments were characterized by sequencing with the DyeDeoxy™ chain terminator method on an variant and another mutation (S50P, 2751ϩ3A→G, A1006E I. Description of the seven novel CFTR mutations and five polymorphisms in CAVD patients Mutation Location Nucleotide Amino acid Markers haplotype changes change (T)n-8CA-17bTA-M470V S50P exon 2 280 T→C Ser → Pro 5T/7T-16-31-ND D110Y exon 4 460 G→T Asp acid → Tyr 7T-17-7-V470 L383S exon 8 1280 T→C Leu → Ser 7T-16-7-M470 H484Y exon 10 1582 C→T His → Tyr no phase-M470 2751ϩ3A→G intron 14a 2751ϩ3 A→G - 5T-16-30-ND Q890R exon 15 2801 A→G Glu → Arg 7T-16-7/29-V470 P1021S exon 17a 3193 C→T Pro → Ser 7T-17-7-M470 Polymorphisms 104C/A 5ЈUTR - 296ϩ128G/C intron 3 - 741C/T exon 6a Ile203 no change 3195A/T exon 17a Pro1021 no change 3212T/C exon 17a Ile1027 no change CAVD ϭ congenital absence of the vas deferens; ND ϭ not determined; 5ЈUTR ϭ 5Ј untranslated region.
X
ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser 10875853:67:754
status: NEW95 CFTR genotypes in 24 patients with congenital unilateral absenceTable III. CFTR genotypes in 110 patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens of the vas deferens Mutations IVS8-6(T) n (%)Mutations IVS8-6(T) n (%) Two CFTR mutations 62 (56) Two CFTR mutations 5 (21) ∆F508/- 5T/9T 2 (8)∆F508/- 5T/9T 17 (15) G542X/- 5T/9T 6 (5) G542X/- 5T/9T 1 3732delA/- 5T/7T 1∆F508/L206W 9T/9T 6 (5) ∆F508/D1270NϩR74W 7T/9T 3 (3) L383S/- 5T/7T 1 One CFTR mutation 4 (17)∆F508/R117H 7T/7T 1 ∆F508/P1021S 7T/9T 1 ∆F508/-a 7T/9T 1 3732delA/-a 7T/7T 1∆F508/M952T 7T/9T 1 ∆F508/D110Y 7T/9T 1 Q890R/- 7T/7T 1 -/-a 5T/7T 1∆F508/S50P 5T/9T 1 ∆F508/2751ϩ3A→G 5T/9T 1 Negative CFTR mutations 15 (62) -/- 7T/7T 10 (42)G542X/R117H 7T/9T 1 G542X/2789ϩ5G→A 7T/9T 1 -/- 7T/9T 3 (12) -/- 9T/9T 2 (8)R117H/2789ϩ5G→A 7T/7T 1 R117H/712-1G→T 7T/9T 1 R117H/∆I507 7T/7T 1 aThree carrier patients with renal agenesis.
X
ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser 10875853:95:547
status: NEW[hide] Heterogenous spectrum of CFTR gene mutations in In... Hum Reprod. 2009 May;24(5):1229-36. Epub 2009 Jan 30. Sharma N, Acharya N, Singh SK, Singh M, Sharma U, Prasad R
Heterogenous spectrum of CFTR gene mutations in Indian patients with congenital absence of vas deferens.
Hum Reprod. 2009 May;24(5):1229-36. Epub 2009 Jan 30., [PMID:19181743]
Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Mutations of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene can cause congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens. Yet, the spectrum and frequency of CFTR mutations in Indian males with congenital absence of vas deferens (CAVD) is unknown. METHODS: We investigated 50 Indian males, diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral absence of vas deferens at the PGIMER, Chandigarh, for the presence of the most common CFTR gene mutations as well as unknown mutations by single-strand conformation polymorphism followed by sequence analysis. RESULTS: This study led to the identification of 12 CFTR gene mutations on 48% of 100 Indian CAVD chromosomes. CFTR mutations were identified on both alleles in 11 patients (22%) and on one allele in 26 patients (52%). Novel CFTR mutations identified were L69H, F87I, G126S, F157C, E543A, Y852F and D1270E. The T5 allele (25%) and F508del (11%) were the most common mutations identified. The most common intragenic marker haplotype for F508del was 2111 (GATT, TUB9, M470V and T854T). No mutations could be detected in 13 CAVD patients (26%), including 4 with renal malformations. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the molecular heterogeneity of CFTR mutations in CAVD. Although the mutation detection rate is indeed lower in Indian CAVD patients, 74% of the patients tested had at least one CFTR mutation. CAVD alleles with no mutations suggest that other changes may be located at the non-screened sites that require extensive search by direct sequencing. Furthermore, the novel CFTR mutations identified require functional studies in a cell-based system.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
76 G-A and P1021S have been described previously in studies of patients with CAVD.
X
ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser 19181743:76:8
status: NEW107 of alleles T5 Reduction of oligo T tract to 5T at 1342-6 Aberrant splicing Intron 8 25 F508del Deletion of 3 bp (CTT or TTT) between 1652 and 1655 Deletion of phenylalanine at 508 Exon 10 11 L69Ha T to A at 338 Leucine to histidine at 69 Exon 3 1 F87Ia T to A at 391 Phenylalanine to isoleucine Exon 3 1 R117H G to A at 482 Arginine to histidine at 117 Exon 4 3 G126Sa G to A at 508 Glycine to serine at 126 Exon 4 1 F157Ca T to G at 602 Phenylalanine to cystine at 157 Exon 4 1 E543Aa A to C at 1760 Glutamate to alanine at 543 Exon 11 1 Y852Fa A to T at 2687 Tyrosine to phenylalanine at 852 Exon 14a 1 3120 þ 1 G-A G to A 3120 þ 1 Aberrant splicing Intron 16 1 P1021S C to T at 3193 Proline to serine at 1021 Exon 17a 1 D1270Ea T to A at 3942 Aspartate to glutamate at 1270 Exon 20 1 Total chromosomes: 100; known mutations: 48%; unknown mutations: 52%.
X
ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser 19181743:107:674
status: NEWX
ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser 19181743:107:696
status: NEW[hide] Do common in silico tools predict the clinical con... Clin Genet. 2010 May;77(5):464-73. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Dorfman R, Nalpathamkalam T, Taylor C, Gonska T, Keenan K, Yuan XW, Corey M, Tsui LC, Zielenski J, Durie P
Do common in silico tools predict the clinical consequences of amino-acid substitutions in the CFTR gene?
Clin Genet. 2010 May;77(5):464-73. Epub 2009 Jan 6., [PMID:20059485]
Abstract [show]
Computational methods are used to predict the molecular consequences of amino-acid substitutions on the basis of evolutionary conservation or protein structure, but their utility in clinical diagnosis or prediction of disease outcome has not been well validated. We evaluated three popular computer programs, namely, PANTHER, SIFT and PolyPhen, by comparing the predicted clinical outcomes for a group of known CFTR missense mutations against the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) and clinical manifestations in cohorts of subjects with CF-disease and CFTR-related disorders carrying these mutations. Owing to poor specificity, none of tools reliably distinguished between individual mutations that confer CF disease from mutations found in subjects with a CFTR-related disorder or no disease. Prediction scores for CFTR mutations derived from PANTHER showed a significant overall statistical correlation with the spectrum of disease severity associated with mutations in the CFTR gene. In contrast, PolyPhen- and SIFT-derived scores only showed significant differences between CF-causing and non-CF variants. Current computational methods are not recommended for establishing or excluding a CF diagnosis, notably as a newborn screening strategy or in patients with equivocal test results.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
64 Mutations in the CFTR gene grouped by clinical category Cystic fibrosis CFTR-related disease No disease T338I D614G L320V V920L L90S M470V H199R S1251N I203M G550R P111A I148T Q1291H R560K L1388Q L183I R170H I1027T S549R D443Y P499A L1414S T908N R668C S549N A455E E1401K Q151K G27E I1234L Y563N R347P C866R S1118C P1290S R75Q A559T V520F P841R M469V E1401G P67L G85E S50Y E1409K R933G G458V G178R Y1032C R248T I980K G85V V392G L973P L137H T351S R334W I444S V938G R792G R560T R555G L1339F D1305E P574H V1240G T1053I D58G G551D L1335P I918M F994C S945L L558S F1337V R810G D1152H G1247R P574S R766M D579G W1098R H949R F200I R352Q L1077P K1351E M244K L206W M1101K D1154G L375F N1303K R1066C E528D D110Y R347H R1070Q A800G P1021S S549K A1364V V392A damaging` (is supposed to affect protein function or structure) and 'probably damaging` (high confidence of affecting protein function or structure).
X
ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser 20059485:64:718
status: NEW[hide] Molecular basis of cystic fibrosis disease: an Ind... Indian J Clin Biochem. 2010 Oct;25(4):335-41. Epub 2010 Nov 19. Prasad R, Sharma H, Kaur G
Molecular basis of cystic fibrosis disease: an Indian perspective.
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2010 Oct;25(4):335-41. Epub 2010 Nov 19., [PMID:21966101]
Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis is a common autosomal recessive disorder usually found in population of white Caucasian descent. Now it is well documented the presence of CF disease in India with the advancement of laboratory testing. As once it was thought non existence of this disease in our population. Most of the phenotype of CF disease was in accordance of western population. Genetic analysis of CFTR gene in Indian CF patients revealed that most common mutation was delta F508 mutation. However, it was less than Caucasian population. CFTR mutations are also a causative factor in the pathogenesis of male infertility due to obstructive azoospermia. There are two most common mutation viz. IVS8-T5 and delta F508 which are responsible for congenital absence of vas deferens in male infertility patients. Elevated levels of sweat chloride at two occasions along with the presence of two mutations in CFTR gene was gold standard method for diagnosis of CF disease. It is noteworthy here that due to magnitude of Indian population, the total CF disease load would be more than many European countries. Clinical data demonstrate the prevalence of both classical and genetic form of CF in India.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
128 Other identified mutations R117H, 3120?1[G-A and P1021S have been described previously in studies of patients with CAVD.
X
ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser 21966101:128:49
status: NEW130 Table 3 CFTR mutations identified and characterized in the Indian patients with CAVD [12] Mutation Nucleotide change No. of alleles T5 Reduction of oligo T tract to 5T at 1342-6 25 F508del Deletion of 3 bp(CTT or TTT) between 1652 and 1655 11 L69H T to A at 338 1 F87I T to A at 391 1 R117H G to A at 482 3 G126S G to A at 508 1 F157C T to G at 602 1 E543A A to C at 1760 1 Y852F A toT at 2687 1 3120?1G-A G to A 3120?1 1 P1021S CtoT at 3193 1 D1270E T to A at 3942 1 We documented NBD1 and NBD2 as the hotspot identified in the CFTR protein in Indian CF population, whereas the regions known to alter chloride permeability (transmembrane regions) and delta F508 mutation in NBD1 are the hot spot for mutation identification in our genital form of CF cases (obstructive azoospermia).
X
ABCC7 p.Pro1021Ser 21966101:130:422
status: NEW