ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe
Predicted by SNAP2: | A: D (66%), C: D (80%), D: D (91%), E: D (75%), F: D (91%), G: D (80%), H: D (80%), I: D (80%), L: D (80%), M: D (80%), N: D (80%), P: D (91%), Q: N (53%), R: N (87%), S: D (66%), T: D (75%), V: D (80%), W: D (91%), Y: D (85%), |
Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: N, C: D, D: N, E: N, F: D, G: N, H: N, I: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: D, Y: D, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Direct comparison of NPPB and DPC as probes of CFT... J Membr Biol. 2000 May 1;175(1):35-52. Zhang ZR, Zeltwanger S, McCarty NA
Direct comparison of NPPB and DPC as probes of CFTR expressed in Xenopus oocytes.
J Membr Biol. 2000 May 1;175(1):35-52., 2000-05-01 [PMID:10811966]
Abstract [show]
Blockers of CFTR with well-characterized kinetics and mechanism of action will be useful as probes of pore structure. We have studied the mechanism of block of CFTR by the arylaminobenzoates NPPB and DPC. Block of macroscopic currents by NPPB and DPC exhibited similar voltage-dependence, suggestive of an overlapping binding region. Kinetic analysis of single-channel currents in the presence of NPPB indicate drug-induced closed time constants averaging 2.2 msec at -100 mV. The affinity for NPPB calculated from single-channel block, K(D) = 35 microm, exceeds that for other arylaminobenzoates studied thus far. These drugs do not affect the rate of activation of wild-type (WT) channels expressed in oocytes, consistent with a simple mechanism of block by pore occlusion, and appear to have a single binding site in the pore. Block by NPPB and DPC were affected by pore-domain mutations in different ways. In contrast to its effects on block by DPC, mutation T1134F-CFTR decreased the affinity and reduced the voltage-dependence for block by NPPB. We also show that the alteration of macroscopic block by NPPB and DPC upon changes in bath pH is due to both direct effects (i.e., alteration of voltage-dependence) and indirect effects (alteration of cytoplasmic drug loading). These results indicate that both NPPB and DPC block CFTR by entering the pore from the cytoplasmic side and that the structural requirements for binding are not the same, although the binding regions within the pore are similar. The two drugs may be useful as probes for overlapping regions in the pore.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
438 This is similar to our results with K335F-CFTR [35].
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 10811966:438:36
status: NEW[hide] Identification of a region of strong discriminatio... Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001 Oct;281(4):L852-67. McCarty NA, Zhang ZR
Identification of a region of strong discrimination in the pore of CFTR.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001 Oct;281(4):L852-67., [PMID:11557589]
Abstract [show]
The variety of methods used to identify the structural determinants of anion selectivity in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator Cl(-) channel has made it difficult to assemble the data into a coherent framework that describes the three-dimensional structure of the pore. Here, we compare the relative importance of sites previously studied and identify new sites that contribute strongly to anion selectivity. We studied Cl(-) and substitute anions in oocytes expressing wild-type cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator or 12-pore-domain mutants to determine relative permeability and relative conductance for 9 monovalent anions and 1 divalent anion. The data indicate that the region of strong discrimination resides between T338 and S341 in transmembrane 6, where mutations affected selectivity between Cl(-) and both large and small anions. Mutations further toward the extracellular end of the pore only strongly affected selectivity between Cl(-) and larger anions. Only mutations at S341 affected selectivity between monovalent and divalent anions. The data are consistent with a narrowing of the pore between the extracellular end and a constriction near the middle of the pore.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
60 Mutants K335E, K335F, T338A, T339A, S341A, S341T, T1134A, and T1134F were prepared as previously described (33).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 11557589:60:15
status: NEW143 Relative permeabilities for WT and mutant CFTRs for monovalent anions CFTR n NO3 Br SCN I ClO4 Acetate Isethionate Glutamate Gluconate WT 16 1.35Ϯ0.01 1.19Ϯ0.02 2.42Ϯ0.06 0.36Ϯ0.01 0.10Ϯ0.01 0.15Ϯ0.00* 0.24Ϯ0.01 0.24Ϯ0.01 0.18Ϯ0.01 K335A 5 1.35Ϯ0.01 1.36Ϯ0.03 3.10Ϯ0.11† 0.75Ϯ0.02† 0.12Ϯ0.01 0.06Ϯ0.01† 0.07Ϯ0.01† 0.07Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.01† K335F 7 1.51Ϯ0.03† 1.36Ϯ0.02† 2.73Ϯ0.14 0.99Ϯ0.03† 0.20Ϯ0.02† 0.13Ϯ0.01 0.18Ϯ0.03 0.30Ϯ0.02 0.20Ϯ0.02 K335E 5 1.24Ϯ0.04 1.17Ϯ0.02 2.60Ϯ0.06 1.10Ϯ0.03† 0.23Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.01† 0.11Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.01† 0.11Ϯ0.01† T338A 5 1.74Ϯ0.07† 1.59Ϯ0.02† 4.35Ϯ0.24† 2.56Ϯ0.13† 1.84Ϯ0.08† 0.07Ϯ0.01† 0.06Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.01† T338E 3 3.65Ϯ0.19† 1.94Ϯ0.04† 4.29Ϯ0.13† 2.41Ϯ0.24† 1.18Ϯ0.06† 0.16Ϯ0.03 0.37Ϯ0.05† 0.36Ϯ0.01† 0.22Ϯ0.03 T339A 5 1.47Ϯ0.01 1.29Ϯ0.03 2.65Ϯ0.06 0.57Ϯ0.02† 0.24Ϯ0.04 0.10Ϯ0.02 0.19Ϯ0.02 0.18Ϯ0.01 0.15Ϯ0.01 S341A 6 1.91Ϯ0.02† 1.42Ϯ0.01† 3.10Ϯ0.09† 0.59Ϯ0.00*† 0.09Ϯ0.00* 0.11Ϯ0.01† 0.12Ϯ0.00*† 0.11Ϯ0.00*† 0.12Ϯ0.00*† S341E 12 2.01Ϯ0.10† 1.46Ϯ0.05† 2.81Ϯ0.18 0.84Ϯ0.00*† 0.31Ϯ0.03† 0.20Ϯ0.01 0.23Ϯ0.02 0.19Ϯ0.01 0.19Ϯ0.02 S341T 5 1.81Ϯ0.05† 1.39Ϯ0.03 3.15Ϯ0.15† 0.41Ϯ0.01 0.07Ϯ0.00* 0.05Ϯ0.00*† 0.06Ϯ0.00*† 0.03Ϯ0.01† 0.06Ϯ0.01† T1134A 6 1.43Ϯ0.02 1.30Ϯ0.02 2.66Ϯ0.02 0.46Ϯ0.00*† 0.06Ϯ0.00*† 0.08Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.01† 0.11Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.00*† T1134F 5 1.31Ϯ0.07 1.17Ϯ0.05 2.50Ϯ0.10 0.63Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.00* 0.13Ϯ0.01 0.09Ϯ0.01† 0.18Ϯ0.02 0.13Ϯ0.01 T1134E 4 1.68Ϯ0.02† 1.39Ϯ0.05† 2.37Ϯ0.18 0.19Ϯ0.03† 0.20Ϯ0.03 0.06Ϯ0.01† 0.09Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.01† Values are means Ϯ SE with only data from the hyperpolarizing ramp protocol; n, no. of oocytes. Relative permeability, permeability of anion x to that of Cl. Anions are listed in order of increasing ionic radius.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 11557589:143:486
status: NEW167 Selectivity sequences for WT and mutant CFTRs CFTR Selectivity Sequence by Relative Permeability WT SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾisethionateϭglutamateϾgluconateϭacetateϾClO4 K335A SCNϾϾBrϭNO3 ϾClϾIϾϾClO4 Ͼgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetate K335F SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϭIϾϾglutamateϾgluconateϭClO4 ϭisethionateϾacetate K335E SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϭIϾClϾϾClO4 Ͼgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetate T338A SCNϾϾIϾϾClO4 ϭNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetate T338E SCNϾNO3 ϾIϾBrϾClO4 ϾClϾϾisethionateϭglutamateϾgluconateϭacetate T339A SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾClO4 ϭisethionateϭglutamateϭgluconateϾacetate S341A SCNϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetateϭClO4 S341E SCNϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾIϾϾClO4 Ͼisethionateϭacetateϭglutamateϭgluconate S341T SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾClO4 ϭisethionateϭgluconateϭacetateϭglutamate T1134A SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾglutamateϭisethionateϭgluconateϭacetateϭClO4 T1134F SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾglutamateϾacetateϭgluconateϾisethionateϭClO4 T1134E SCNϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾClO4 ϭIϾgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetate L856 A REGION OF STRONG DISCRIMINATION IN THE CFTR PORE AJP-Lung Cell Mol Physiol • VOL 281 • OCTOBER 2001 • www.ajplung.org out propagation to distant sites.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 11557589:167:367
status: NEW191 Relative conductances for WT and mutant CFTRs for monovalent anions CFTR n NO3 Br SCN I ClO4 Acetate Isethionate Glutamate Gluconate WT 16 0.87Ϯ0.01 0.77Ϯ0.01 0.18Ϯ0.01 0.25Ϯ0.01 0.23Ϯ0.01 0.55Ϯ0.01 0.50Ϯ0.01 0.57Ϯ0.02 0.56Ϯ0.02 K335A 5 0.88Ϯ0.04 0.77Ϯ0.02 0.30Ϯ0.02† 0.35Ϯ0.02 0.24Ϯ0.02 0.33Ϯ0.01† 0.32Ϯ0.02† 0.37Ϯ0.02† 0.38Ϯ0.02† K335F 7 1.21Ϯ0.05† 0.87Ϯ0.02† 0.55Ϯ0.02† 0.36Ϯ0.01† 0.19Ϯ0.01 0.34Ϯ0.01† 0.34Ϯ0.01† 0.41Ϯ0.01† 0.37Ϯ0.01† K335E 5 1.16Ϯ0.05† 0.91Ϯ0.02† 0.59Ϯ0.02† 0.51Ϯ0.02† 0.28Ϯ0.01 0.22Ϯ0.01† 0.25Ϯ0.01† 0.22Ϯ0.01† 0.24Ϯ0.01† T338A 5 1.20Ϯ0.13† 1.03Ϯ0.06† 0.98Ϯ0.12† 0.82Ϯ0.02† 0.50Ϯ0.04† 0.18Ϯ0.05† 0.08Ϯ0.01† 0.31Ϯ0.05† 0.29Ϯ0.05† T338E 3 3.66Ϯ0.36† 1.53Ϯ0.09† 1.80Ϯ0.12† 1.39Ϯ0.11† 0.87Ϯ0.03† 0.36Ϯ0.04† 0.56Ϯ0.17 0.44Ϯ0.03† 0.48Ϯ0.03† T339A 5 1.01Ϯ0.02† 0.77Ϯ0.03 0.22Ϯ0.01 0.31Ϯ0.03 0.23Ϯ0.01 0.38Ϯ0.02† 0.48Ϯ0.01 0.48Ϯ0.01 0.52Ϯ0.01 S341A 6 1.67Ϯ0.01† 1.08Ϯ0.01† 0.63Ϯ0.03† 0.26Ϯ0.00* 0.15Ϯ0.01† 0.63Ϯ0.01† 0.54Ϯ0.02 0.63Ϯ0.01 0.63Ϯ0.01 S341E 12 1.74Ϯ0.11† 1.14Ϯ0.02† 1.81Ϯ0.06† 0.48Ϯ0.01† 0.35Ϯ0.02† 0.28Ϯ0.01† 0.69Ϯ0.02† 0.65Ϯ0.01† 0.68Ϯ0.01† S341T 5 0.85Ϯ0.02 0.82Ϯ0.01 0.29Ϯ0.01† 0.22Ϯ0.01 0.13Ϯ0.01† 0.48Ϯ0.01 0.45Ϯ0.02 0.43Ϯ0.02 0.55Ϯ0.01 T1134A 6 0.83Ϯ0.02 0.78Ϯ0.01 0.24Ϯ0.01† 0.21Ϯ0.01 0.09Ϯ0.01† 0.39Ϯ0.01† 0.38Ϯ0.01† 0.39Ϯ0.01† 0.40Ϯ0.01 T1134F 5 0.68Ϯ0.03† 0.69Ϯ0.03† 0.36Ϯ0.01† 0.07Ϯ0.01† 0.16Ϯ0.01 0.48Ϯ0.02 0.30Ϯ0.02† 0.22Ϯ0.01† 0.32Ϯ0.02† T1134E 4 0.99Ϯ0.02† 1.00Ϯ0.02† 0.50Ϯ0.02† 0.20Ϯ0.03 0.26Ϯ0.02 0.32Ϯ0.03† 0.34Ϯ0.01† 0.34Ϯ0.03† 0.34Ϯ0.03† Values are means Ϯ SE with only data from the hyperpolarizing ramp protocol; n, no. of oocytes. Relative conductance, conductance of anion x to that of Cl. Anions are listed in order of increasing ionic radius.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 11557589:191:475
status: NEW213 Vrev Cl in ND96 bath solution for WT and mutant CFTRs CFTR n Vrev Cl WT 16 -21.24Ϯ0.59 K335A 5 -22.12Ϯ0.35 K335F 7 -21.92Ϯ0.90 K335E 5 -22.88Ϯ0.36 T338A 5 -26.97Ϯ0.79* T338E 3 -20.58Ϯ1.07 T339A 5 -22.21Ϯ0.98 S341A 6 -21.21Ϯ0.56 S341E 12 -28.77Ϯ1.36* S341T 5 -26.62Ϯ1.43* T1134A 6 -28.33Ϯ1.23* T1134F 5 -19.74Ϯ0.73 T1134E 4 -27.54Ϯ1.27* Values are means Ϯ SE; n, no. of oocytes.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 11557589:213:119
status: NEW217 At K335, Gx/GCl values for all small anions were increased in K335F CFTR compared with K335A CFTR, whereas Px/PCl values for these anions were not affected by the bulky side chain.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 11557589:217:62
status: NEW329 This behavior was retained in K335F and T1134F CFTR but lost in all other mutants.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 11557589:329:30
status: NEW388 Selectivity between Cl- and the divalent anion S2O3 2CFTR n GS2O3/GCl WT 16 0.39Ϯ0.01 K335A 5 0.37Ϯ0.01 K335F 7 0.39Ϯ0.01 K335E 5 0.34Ϯ0.01* T338A 5 0.38Ϯ0.01 T338E 3 0.70Ϯ0.08* T339A 5 0.39Ϯ0.02 S341A 6 0.27Ϯ0.01* S341E 12 0.54Ϯ0.01* S341T 5 0.38Ϯ0.01 T1134A 6 0.34Ϯ0.02 T1134F 5 0.33Ϯ0.01* T1134E 4 0.44Ϯ0.05 Values are means Ϯ SE; n, no. of oocytes.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 11557589:388:116
status: NEW[hide] CFTR: mechanism of anion conduction. Physiol Rev. 1999 Jan;79(1 Suppl):S47-75. Dawson DC, Smith SS, Mansoura MK
CFTR: mechanism of anion conduction.
Physiol Rev. 1999 Jan;79(1 Suppl):S47-75., [PMID:9922376]
Abstract [show]
CFTR: Mechanism of Anion Conduction. Physiol. Rev. 79, Suppl.: S47-S75, 1999. - The purpose of this review is to collect together the results of recent investigations of anion conductance by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator along with some of the basic background that is a prerequisite for developing some physical picture of the conduction process. The review begins with an introduction to the concepts of permeability and conductance and the Nernst-Planck and rate theory models that are used to interpret these parameters. Some of the physical forces that impinge on anion conductance are considered in the context of permeability selectivity and anion binding to proteins. Probes of the conduction process are considered, particularly permeant anions that bind tightly within the pore and block anion flow. Finally, structure-function studies are reviewed in the context of some predictions for the origin of pore properties.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
582 Substituting the phenylalanine (K335F) led to a modest decrease in DPC binding Transmembrane segment 1 has been the subject of several studies that have not produced consonant results.and did not alter the i-V relation.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 9922376:582:32
status: NEW[hide] Novel pore-lining residues in CFTR that govern per... Neuron. 1994 Sep;13(3):623-34. McDonough S, Davidson N, Lester HA, McCarty NA
Novel pore-lining residues in CFTR that govern permeation and open-channel block.
Neuron. 1994 Sep;13(3):623-34., [PMID:7522483]
Abstract [show]
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is both a member of the ATP-binding cassette superfamily and a Cl(-)-selective ion channel. We investigated the permeation pathway of human CFTR with measurements on conduction and open-channel blockade by diphenylamine-2-carboxylic acid (DPC). We used site-directed mutagenesis and oocyte expression to locate residues in transmembrane domain (TM) 6 and TM 12 that contact DPC and control rectification and single-channel conductances. Thus, TM 12 and the previously investigated TM 6 line the CFTR pore. In each TM, residues in contact with DPC are separated by two turns of an alpha helix. The contributions of TM 6 and TM 12 to DPC block and Cl- permeation, however, are not equivalent. The resulting structural model for the conduction pathway may guide future studies of permeation in other Cl- channels and ATP-binding cassette transporters.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
78 Affinity and Voltage Dependence for Block of CFTR Variants by DPC Construct TM Ko( - 100) (PM) 0 I-V Relation n Properties Wild type Wild type low [Cl-], (10 mM) K335E 6 K335F 6 T338A 6 T339A 6 S341A 6 S341T 6 S1118A 11 T1134A 12 T1134F 12 S1141A 12 Triple 6,12 276 f 14 181 f 13" 303 -t 14 351 * 15' 220 * 14 284 * 47 1251 f 116a 530 f 80" 243 * 37 230 * 20 74 * 3" 220 * 13 325 * 26b 0.41 f 0.01 0.32 f 0.02" 0.42 f 0.01 0.42 f 0.02 0.36 f 0.02" 0.44 * 0.12 0.49 * 0.03" 0.35 f 0.09 0.40 f 0.02 0.35 * 0.02" 0.41 f 0.01 0.42 f 0.03 0.21 * O.Ol",b Linear, E,,, = -8 f 1 mV Ere\ = +48+2mV Inward rectification Linear Linear Linear Strong inward rectification Inward rectification Linear Linear Linear Linear Strong inward rectification Affinity for DPC was determined empirically at -100 mV, from whole-cell currents measured in the presence of 200 uM DPC (see Experimental Procedures).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 7522483:78:170
status: NEW91 In TM 6, K335F displayed no change in rectification or 0 but slightly weakened DPC binding (Table 1).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 7522483:91:9
status: NEW156 Also in TM 6, mutation K335F slightly reduces DPC block, and mutation K335E gives inward rectification (see also Tabcharani et al., 1993).
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 7522483:156:23
status: NEW240 The relative orientation of the side chains on the phenylalanines of K335F and T1134F may explain the opposite results of phenylalanines placed at these nearly equivalent positions.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 7522483:240:69
status: NEW252 In TM 6, the K335F mutation slightly decreased DPC binding affinity.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 7522483:252:13
status: NEW267 MDR has a rather broad substrate specificity, perhaps be- (C) Same as (B), with mutations K335F and T1134F highlighted.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 7522483:267:90
status: NEW268 Note that K335F lies parallel to the second phenyl ring of DPC, and T1134F lies perpendicular.
X
ABCC7 p.Lys335Phe 7522483:268:10
status: NEW