ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Gln890*

ClinVar:	c.2669A>G , p.Gln890Arg ? , not provided c.2668C>T , p.Gln890* D , Pathogenic
CF databases:	c.2668C>T , p.Gln890* D , CF-causing c.2669A>G , p.Gln890Arg (CFTR1) ? , This mutation was found by DGGE and direct DNA sequencing in a Spanish CUAVD patient.

[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Publications
[hide] A novel mutation in the CFTR gene correlates with ... J Med Genet. 2000 Mar;37(3):215-8. Wang J, Bowman MC, Hsu E, Wertz K, Wong LJ
A novel mutation in the CFTR gene correlates with severe clinical phenotype in seven Hispanic patients.
J Med Genet. 2000 Mar;37(3):215-8., [PMID:10777364]

Abstract [show]

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
570 SYLVAIN R RIVARD* CHRISTIAN ALLARD† JEAN-PIERRE LEBLANC† MARCEL MILOT† GERVAIS AUBIN† FERNAND SIMARD† CLAUDE FÉREC‡ MARC DE BRAEKELEER†§¶ *Département des Sciences Fondamentales, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Canada Table 1 Distribution of cystic fibrosis patients diagnosed before the age of 5 by age groups in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, (A) by genotype, (B) by mutation 0-10 years 10.1-20 years Over 20 years All ages No % No % No % No % (A) Genotype F508/ F508 15 (1) 40.5 21 (2) 36.2 18 (3) 42.9 54 (6) 39.4 F508/621+1G→T 12 (1) 32.4 16 (1) 27.6 10 (1*) 23.8 38 (3*) 27.7 F508/A455E 1 2.7 6 10.3 5 11.9 12 8.8 F508/I148T 1 2.7 1 1.7 2 1.5 F508/Y1092X 3 (1) 5.2 1 2.4 4 (1) 2.9 F508/Q890X 1 2.4 1 0.7 F508/R1158X 1 2.4 1 0.7 621+1G→T/621+1G→T 2 (1) 5.4 4 6.9 1 2.4 7 (1) 5.1 621+1G→T/A455E 1 2.7 4 6.9 3 7.1 8 5.8 621+1G→T/711+1G→T 2 (1) 5.4 2 (1) 3.4 4 (2) 2.9 621+1G→T/Y1092X 1 2.7 1 0.7 621+1G→T/S489X 1 2.7 1 0.7 621+1G→T/G85E 1 (1) 1.7 1 (1) 2.4 2 (2) 1.5 A455E/R117C 1 2.7 1 0.7 N1303K/I148T 1 2.4 1 0.7 Total 37 58 42 137 Death (4) 10.8 (6) 10.3 (5*) 11.9 (15*) 10.9 (B) Mutation F508 16 (1) 43.2 25 (3) 43.1 21 (3) 51.2 62 (7) 45.6 621+1G→T 18 (3) 48.6 23 (3) 39.7 12 (2*) 29.3 53 (8*) 39.0 A455E 3 8.1 10 17.2 8 19.5 21 15.4 Total 37 58 41 136 Death (4) 10.8 (6) 10.3 (5*) (12.2) (15*) (11.0) ( ): Number of deaths. Login to comment

[hide] Gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic involvemen... Pancreas. 2001 May;22(4):395-9. Modolell I, Alvarez A, Guarner L, De Gracia J, Malagelada JR
Gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic involvement in adult patients with cystic fibrosis.
Pancreas. 2001 May;22(4):395-9., [PMID:11345141]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: The clinical prevalence of cystic fibrosis (CF) in adults continues to rise, with a consequent impact on adult gastroenterology practice. AIM: To characterize the gastrointestinal manifestations of CF in adult patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical records of 89 adult CF patients treated at our institution from 1992 to 1999 were reviewed. Patients were distributed into two groups: group A (39 patients), which consisted of patients who were diagnosed with CF at when they were younger than 14 years old and who survived into adulthood; and group B (50 patients), who were diagnosed with CF at the age of 14 years or older. Data on CF genetic mutations, nutritional state, evidence of pulmonary, gastrointestinal, liver, or pancreatic involvement were collected for each patient. RESULTS: The most prevalent genetic mutation in our series was deltaF508, present in 50 patients (56.2%), 29 of whom belonged to group A and 21 who belonged to group B. In group A, the deltaF508 mutation was associated with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (PI) in 26 of 29 patients (89.6%), whereas in group B it was associated with PI in only four patients (19%). Overall, PI was present in 33 of 39 patients (84.6%) in group A and in eight of 50 patients (16%) in group B. Four patients in group B had experienced previous episodes of acute pancreatitis; two of them had associated PI. Of the 89 patients, 12 (10 in group A) were malnourished. Malnutrition was invariably associated with PI. Hepatic and biliary tree abnormalities were particularly prevalent in patients in group A and was usually associated with PI. Intestinal manifestations were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of CF before the age of 14 years is associated with greater gastrointestinal compromise than diagnosis at an older age, particularly with regard to PI. CF carriers of the deltaF508 mutation have an increased risk of developing gastrointestinal manifestations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
51 In the 10 patients of group A without ⌬F508, the mutations identified were: G542X (present in five), R1162X, Q890X, ⌬I507, 2183A, and 1609-CA. Login to comment
64 Other genotypes present in our series ⌬F508/711+1G>T 2A 5T/5T 1B ⌬F508/5T 2B ⌬1507/- 1A ⌬F508/R117H 2B R1162X/1898+1G>A 1A ⌬F508/R1162X 1A 2183A/- 1A ⌬F508/N1303K 1A 1609-CA/1811+1.6kbA>G 1A ⌬F508/3272-26A>G 1B 1609-CA/R347P 1A ⌬F508/D836Y 1B Q890X/- 1A ⌬F508/1717-1G>A 1A R334W/- 1B G542X/W1282X 1A N1303K/2789+5G>A 1B G542X/2789+5G>A 1B 3659-C/- 1B G542X/P205S 1B G85E/- 1B G542X/D1270N 1B Negative 1A, 20B L206W/- 1B Unknown 2A creatic insufficiency was highly prevalent, affecting 33 patients (84.6%). Login to comment

[hide] ATB(0)/SLC1A5 gene. Fine localisation and exclusio... Eur J Hum Genet. 2001 Nov;9(11):860-6. Larriba S, Sumoy L, Ramos MD, Gimenez J, Estivill X, Casals T, Nunes V
ATB(0)/SLC1A5 gene. Fine localisation and exclusion of association with the intestinal phenotype of cystic fibrosis.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2001 Nov;9(11):860-6., [PMID:11781704]

Abstract [show]
The Na+-dependent amino acid transporter named ATB(0) was previously found to be located in 19q13.3 by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Genetic heterogeneity in the 19q13.2-13.4 region, syntenic to the Cystic Fibrosis Modulator Locus 1 (CFM1) in mouse, seemed to be associated to the intestinal phenotypic variation of cystic fibrosis (CF). We performed fine chromosomal mapping of ATB(0) on radiation hybrid (RH) panels G3 and TNG. Based on the most accurate location results from TNG-RH panel, mapping analysis evidenced that ATB(0) is localised between STS SHGC-13875 (D19S995) and STS SHGC-6138 in 19q13.3, that corresponds with the immediately telomeric/distal segment of the strongest linkage region within the human CFM1 (hCFM1) syntenic region. Regarding to the genomic structure and exon organisation, our results show that the ATB(0) gene is organised into eight exons. The knowledge of the genomic structure allowed us to perform an exhaustive mutational analysis of the gene. Evaluation of the possible implication of ATB(0) in the intestinal phenotype of CF was performed on the basis of the functional characteristics of the encoded protein, its apparent relevance to meconium ileus (MI) and position in relation to the hCFM1 syntenic region. We have analysed this gene in samples from CF patients with and without MI. Several sequence variations in the ATB(0) gene were identified, although none of them seemed to be related to the intestinal phenotype of CF. Even though no particular allele or haplotype in ATB(0) appears to be associated to CF-MI disease, new SNPs identified should be useful in segregation and linkage disequilibrium analyses in families affected by other disorders caused by the impairment of neutral amino acid transport.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
151 Statistical analysis showed that the higher incidence for P17A and the lower incidence for V512L observed in the general population Table 3 CFTR mutations of the CF patients under study with and without meconium ileus (MI) CF-non MI CF-MI CFTR mutations n CFTR mutations n F508del/R117H 2 F508del/F508del 7 F508del/R334W 3 F508del/L365P 1 F508del/R347P 1 F508del/G542X 1 F508del/621+1G4Ta 1 F508del/621+IG4Ta 1 F508del/M1101K 1 F508del/R1066C 1 F508del/1609delCAa 1 F508del/W1089X 1 F508del/2789+5G4Aa 3 F508del/R1162X 1 F508del/3849+10kbC4T 1 F508del/1609delCAa 1 G542X/G85E 1 F508del/Q1281X 1 G542X/V232D 1 F508del/1811+1.6kbA4G 1 G542X/1811+1.6kb A4Ga 1 F508del/2789+5G4Aa 1 G542X/2789+5G4A 1 F508del/2869insG 1 Q890X/L206W 1 F508del/unknown 1 1811+1.6kbA4G/P205S 1 I507del/I507del 1 R1162X/3272-26A4G 1 G542X/1078delT 1 N1303K/R347H 1 G542X/1811+1.6kbA4Ga 1 N1303K/A1006E+5T 1 S549R/CFTR50kbdel 1 2789+5G4A/405+1G4A 1 R1066C/R1066C 1 W1282X/712-1G4T 1 a CF patient with a sibling presenting identical CFTR genotype and discordance of intestinal phenotype. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR muta... Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM
Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.
Hum Mutat. 2002 Jun;19(6):575-606., [PMID:12007216]

Abstract [show]
Although there have been numerous reports from around the world of mutations in the gene of chromosome 7 known as CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), little attention has been given to integrating these mutant alleles into a global understanding of the population molecular genetics associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). We determined the distribution of CFTR mutations in as many regions throughout the world as possible in an effort designed to: 1) increase our understanding of ancestry-genotype relationships, 2) compare mutational arrays with disease incidence, and 3) gain insight for decisions regarding screening program enhancement through CFTR multi-mutational analyses. Information on all mutations that have been published since the identification and cloning of the CFTR gene's most common allele, DeltaF508 (or F508del), was reviewed and integrated into a centralized database. The data were then sorted and regional CFTR arrays were determined using mutations that appeared in a given region with a frequency of 0.5% or greater. Final analyses were based on 72,431 CF chromosomes, using data compiled from over 100 original papers, and over 80 regions from around the world, including all nations where CF has been studied using analytical molecular genetics. Initial results confirmed wide mutational heterogeneity throughout the world; however, characterization of the most common mutations across most populations was possible. We also examined CF incidence, DeltaF508 frequency, and regional mutational heterogeneity in a subset of populations. Data for these analyses were filtered for reliability and methodological strength before being incorporated into the final analysis. Statistical assessment of these variables revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between DeltaF508 frequency and the CF incidence levels of regional populations. Regional analyses were also performed to search for trends in the distribution of CFTR mutations across migrant and related populations; this led to clarification of ancestry-genotype patterns that can be used to design CFTR multi-mutation panels for CF screening programs. From comprehensive assessment of these data, we offer recommendations that multiple CFTR alleles should eventually be included to increase the sensitivity of newborn screening programs employing two-tier testing with trypsinogen and DNA analysis.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
111 Slovakia ∆F508 (57.3%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.2%) 82.7 68.4 14 908/254 CFGAC [1994]; Estivill et al. G542X (6.8%) 3849+10KbC→T (1.0%) [1997]; Dörk et al. [2000]; R553X (4.0%) S42F (0.9%) Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (3.4%) R75X (0.9%) 2143delT (1.8%) G85E (0.9%) R347P (1.4%) 605insT (0.9%) W1282X (1.3%) 1898+1G→A (0.9%) Slovenia ∆F508 (57.8%) R347P (1.1%) 79.7 63.5 16 455/132 CFGAC [1994]; Dörk et al. 2789+5G→A (4.1%) S4X (0.8%) [2000]; Macek et al. [2002] R1162X (3.2%) 457TAT→G (0.8%) G542X (1.9%) D192G (0.8%) Q552X (1.5%) R553X (0.8%) Q685X (1.5%) A559T (0.8%) 3905insT (1.5%) 2907delTT (0.8%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.5%) 3667ins4 (0.8%) Spain ∆F508 (52.7%) G85E (0.8%) 80.2 64.3 21 3608/1356 Chillón et al. [1994]; Casals et G542X (8.0%) R1066C (0.8%) al. [1997]; Estivill et al. [1997] N1303K (2.5%) 2789+5G→A (0.7%) 3601-111G→C (2.0%) 2869insG (0.7%) 1811+1.6Kb A→G (1.7%) ∆I507 (0.6%) R1162X (1.6%) W1282X (0.6%) 711+1G→T (1.3%) L206W (0.5%) R334W (1.2%) R709X (0.5%) Q890X (1.0%) K710X (0.5%) 1609delCA (1.0%) 3272-26A→G (0.5%) 712-1G→T (1.0%) Sweden ∆F508 (66.6%) E60X (0.6%) 85.9 73.8 10 1357/662 Schwartz et al. [1994]; Estivill et 394delTT (7.3%) Y109C (0.6%) al. [1997]; Schaedel et al. 3659delC (5.4%) R117H (0.6%) [1999] 175insT (2.4%) R117C (0.6%) T338I (1.2%) G542X (0.6%) Switzerland ∆F508 (57.2%) K1200E (2.1%) 91.3 83.4 9 1268/1173 Estivill et al. [1997]; R553X (14.0%) N1303K (1.2%) Hergersberg et al. [1997] 3905insT (9.8%) W1282X (1.1%) 1717-1G→A (2.7%) R347P (0.6%) G542X (2.6%) Ukraine ∆F508 (65.2%) CFTRdele2,3 (1.1%) 74.6 55.7 6 1055/580 Estivill et al. [1997]; Dörk et al. R553X (3.6%) G551D (1.8%) [2000]; Macek et al. [2002] N1303K (2.4%) W1282X (0.5%) United ∆F508 (75.3%) 621+1G→T (0.93%) 81.6 66.6 5 19622/9815 Schwartz et al. [1995b]; Kingdom G551D (3.1%) 1717-1G→A (0.57%) Estivill et al. [1997] (total) G542X (1.7%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS585 United ∆F508 (56.6%) 621+1G→T (1.8%) 69.1 47.7 7 456 CFGAC [1994] Kingdom G551D (3.7%) R117H (1.5%) (N. Ireland) R560T (2.6%) ∆I507 (0.9%) G542X (2.0%) United ∆F508 (19.2%) 621+2T→C (3.8%) 84.4 71.2 11 52 Malone et al. [1998] Kingdom Y569D (15.4%) 2184insA (3.8%) (Pakistani) Q98X (11.5%) R560S (1.9%) 1525-1G→A (9.6%) 1898+1G→T (1.9%) 296+12T→C (7.7%) R709X (1.9%) 1161delC (7.7%) United ∆F508 (71.3%) 1717-1G→A (1.0%) 86.4 74.6 9 1236/730 Shrimpton et al. [1991]; Kingdom G551D (5.5%) 621+1G→T (0.6%) Gilfillan et al. [1998] (Scotland) G542X (4.0%) ∆I507 (0.6%) R117H (1.4%) R560T (0.6%) P67L (1.4%) United ∆F508 (71.6%) 1717-1G→A (1.1%) 98.7 97.4 17 183 Cheadle et al. [1993] Kingdom 621+1G→T (6.6%) 3659delC (0.5%) (Wales) 1898+1G→A (5.5%) R117H (0.5%) G542X (2.2%) N1303K (0.5%) G551D (2.2%) E60X (0.5%) 1078delT (2.2%) S549N (0.5%) R1283M (1.6%) 3849+10KbC→T (0.5%) R553X (1.1%) 4016insT (0.5%) ∆I507 (1.1%) Yugoslavia ∆F508 (68.9%) 3849G→A (1.0%) 82.2 67.6 11 709/398 Dabovic et al. [1992]; Estivill et G542X (4.0%) N1303K (0.8%) al. [1997]; Macek et al. R1162C (3.0%) 525delT (0.5%) (submitted for publication) 457TAT→G (1.0%) 621+1G→T (0.5%) I148T (1.0%) G551D (0.5%) Q552X (1.0%) Middle East/Africa Algeria 1) DF508 (20.0%) 4) 1812-1G®A (5.0%) - - 5 20 Loumi et al. [1999] 2) N1303K (20.0%) 5) V754M (5.0%) 3) 711+1G®T (10.0%) Jewish W1282X (48.0%) 3849+10KbC→T (6.0%) 95.0 90.3 6 261 Kerem et al. [1995] (Ashkenazi) ∆F508 (28.0%) N1303K (3.0%) G542X (9.0%) 1717-1G→A (1.0%) Jewish 1) N1303K - - 1 6 Kerem et al. [1995] (Egypt) Jewish 1) Q359K/T360K - - 1 8 Kerem et al. [1995] (Georgia) Jewish 1) DF508 2) 405+1G®A - - 2 11 Kerem et al. [1995] (Libya) Jewish 1) DF508 (72.0%) 3) D1152H (6.0%) - - 3 33 Kerem et al. [1995] (Morocco) 2) S549R (6.0%) Jewish ∆F508 (35.0%) W1282X (2.0%) 43.0 18.5 4 51 Shoshani et al. [1992] (Sepharadim) G542X (4.0%) S549I (2.0%) (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL. Login to comment
112 Jewish 1) 405+1G®A (48.0%) 3) W1282X (17.0%) - - 4 23 Kerem et al. [1995] (Tunisia) 2) DF508 (31.0%) 4) 3849+10KbC®T (4.0%) Jewish 1) G85E 4) G542X - - 6 10 Kerem et al. [1995] (Turkey) 2) DF508 5) 3849+10KbC®T 3) W1282X 6) W1089X Jewish (Yemen) None - - 0 5 Kerem et al. [1995] Lebanon 1) DF508 (35.0%) 6) 4096-28G®A (2.5%) - - 9 40 Desgeorges et al. [1997] 2) W1282X (20.0%) 7) 2789+5G®A (2.5%) 3) 4010del4 (10.0%) 8) M952I (2.5%) 4) N1303K (10.0%) 9) E672del (2.5%) 5) S4X (5.0%) Reunion ∆F508 (52.0%) 1717-1G→A (0.7%) 90.4 81.7 9 138 Cartault et al. [1996] Island Y122X (24.0%) G542X (0.7%) 3120+1G→A (8.0%) A309G (0.7%) A455E (2.2%) 2789+5G→A (0.7%) G551D (1.4%) Saudi North: 3) H139L - - North 1 49 families El-Harith et al. [1997]; Arabia 1) 1548delG 4) L1177X Central 3 Kambouris et al. [1997]; Central: 5) DF508 South 4 Banjar et al. [1999] 1)I1234V 6) 3120+1G®A West 9 2)1548delG 7) 425del42 East 6 3)DF508 8) R553X South: 9) N1303K 1) I1234V East: 2) 1548delG 1) 3120+1G®A 3) 711+1G®T 2) H139L 4) 3120+1G®A 3) 1548delG West: 4) DF508 1) I1234V 5) S549R 2) G115X 6) N1303K Tunisia ∆F508 (17.6%) G85E (2.6%) 58.7 34.5 11 78 Messaoud et al. [1996] G542X (8.9%) W1282X (2.6%) 711+1G→T (7.7%) Y122X (1.3%) N1303K (6.4%) T665S (1.3%) 2766del8NT (6.4%) R47W+D1270N (1.3%) R1066C (2.6%) Turkeye ∆F508 (24.5%) 1066L (1.3%) 80.6 65.0 36 1067/670 Yilmaz et al. [1995]; Estivill et al. 1677delTA (4.1%) E822X (1.3%) [1997]; Onay et al. [1998]; 2789+5G→A (3.9%) 2183+5G→A+2184insA (1.3%) Macek et al. [2002] 2181delA (3.8%) D110H (0.8%) R347H (3.6%) P1013L (0.8%) N1303K (2.9%) 3172delAC (0.8%) 621+1G→T (2.6%) 1259insA (0.8%) G542X (2.6%) M1028I (0.8%) TABLE 1. Continued. Estimated Projected detection of Number of Number of Country/ allele two CFTR mutations chromosomes Region Mutation array detectiona mutationsb includedc (max/min)d Reference WORLDWIDEANALYSISOFCFTRMUTATIONS587 E92K (2.6%) 4005+1G→A (0.7%) A96E (2.6%) W1282X (0.7%) M152V (2.6%) I148T (0.6%) 2183AA→G (2.5%) R1162X (0.6%) 296+9A→T (1.6%) D1152H (0.6%) 2043delG (1.4%) W1098X (0.6%) E92X (1.4%) E831X (0.6%) K68N (1.4%) W496X (0.6%) G85E (1.3%) F1052V (0.5%) R1158X (1.3%) L571S (0.5%) United Arab S549R (61.5%) ∆F508 (26.9%) 88.4 78.1 2 86/52 Frossard et al. [1988]; Emirates Frossard et al. [1999] North/Central/South Americas Argentina ∆F508 (58.6%) N1303K (1.8%) 69.1 47.7 5 326/228 CFGAC [1994]; Chertkoff et al. W1282X (3.9%) 1717-1G→A (0.9%) [1997] G542X (3.9%) Brazilf ∆F508 (47.7%) W1282X (1.3%) 66.8 44.6 10 820/500 CFGAC [1994]; Cabello et al. (total) G542X (7.2%) G85E (1.3%) [1999]; Raskin et al. [1999]; R1162X (2.5%) R553X (0.7%) Bernardino et al. [2000] R334W (2.5%) L206W (0.6%) N1303K (2.4%) 2347delG (0.6%) South East: >∆F508, G542X South: >N1303K Brazil ∆F508 (31.7%) N1303K (2.5%) 42.5 18.1 3 120 Parizotto and Bertuzzo [1997] (Sao Paulo) G542X (8.3%) Canada ∆F508 (59.0%) G542X (0.5%) 98.5 97.0 13 381/200 Rozen et al. [1992]; (Lac St. Jean) 621+1G→T (24.3%) N1303K (0.5%) De Braekeleer et al. [1998] A445E (8.2%) Q890X (0.5%) Y1092X (1.2%) S489X (0.5) 711+1G→T (1.0%) R117C (0.5%) I148T (1.0%) R1158 (0.5%) G85E (0.8%) Canada ∆F508 (71.4%) ∆I507 (1.3%) 90.9 82.6 7 77 Rozen et al. [1992] (Quebec City) 711+1G→T (9.1%) Y1092X (1.3%) 621+1G→T (5.2%) N1303K (1.3%) A455E (1.3%) Canada ∆F508 (70.9%) W1282X (0.9%) 82.0 67.2 10 632 Kristidis et al. [1992] (Toronto) G551D (3.1%) R117H (0.9%) G542X (2.2%) 1717-1G→A (0.6%) 621+1G→T (1.3%) R560T (0.6%) N1303K (0.9%) ∆I507 (0.6%) Chile ∆F508 (29.2%) R553X (4.2%) 33.4 11.2 2 72 Rios et al. [1994] Columbia 1) DF508 (35.4%) 3) N1303K (2.1%) - - 4 48 Restrepo et al. [2000] 2) G542X (6.3%) 4) W1282X (2.1%) Ecuador 1) DF508 (25%) - - 1 20 Paz-y-Mino et al. [1999] (Continued) BOBADILLAETAL. Login to comment

[hide] Analysis by mass spectrometry of 100 cystic fibros... Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2066-72. Wang Z, Milunsky J, Yamin M, Maher T, Oates R, Milunsky A
Analysis by mass spectrometry of 100 cystic fibrosis gene mutations in 92 patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens.
Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2066-72., [PMID:12151438]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Limited mutation analysis for congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) has revealed only a minority of men in whom two distinct mutations were detected. We aimed to determine whether a more extensive mutation analysis would be of benefit in genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 92 men with CBAVD using mass spectrometry and primer oligonucleotide base extension to analyse an approximately hierarchical set of the most common 100 CF mutations. RESULTS: Analysis of 100 CF mutations identified 33/92 (35.9%) patients with two mutations and 29/92 (31.5%) with one mutation, compound heterozygosity accounting for 94% (31/33) of those with two mutations. This panel detected 12.0% more CBAVD men with at least one mutation and identified a second mutation in >50% of those considered to be heterozygotes under the two routine 25 mutation panel analyses. CONCLUSION: Compound heterozygosity of severe/mild mutations accounted for the vast majority of the CBAVD patients with two mutations, and underscores the value of a more extensive CF mutation panel for men with CBAVD. The CF100 panel enables higher carrier detection rates especially for men with CBAVD, their partners, partners of known CF carriers, and those with 'mild' CF with rarer mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
20 Given the frequency of CF mutations, especially in the Caucasian population ( in 25), and the common request by CBAVD men to sire their own offspring by using surgical Table I. The 100 most common cystic fibrosis mutations listed by exon Mutationa Exonb Frequency (%)c G85E 3 0.1 394delTT 3 Swedish E60X 3 Belgium R75X 3 405ϩ1G→A Int 3 R117H 4 0.30 Y122X 4 French 457TAT→G 4 Austria I148T 4 Canada (French Canadian) 574delA 4 444delA 4 R117L 4 621ϩ1G→T Int 4 0.72 711ϩ1G→T Int 5 Ͼ0.1 712-1G→T Int 5 711ϩ5G→A Int 5 Italy (Caucasian) L206W 6a R347P 7 0.24 1078delT 7 Ͼ0.1 R334W 7 Ͼ0.1 1154InsTC 7 T338I 7 Italy R347H 7 Turkey Q359K/T360K 7 Israel (Georgian Jews) I336K 7 R352Q 7 G330X 7 S364P 7 A455E 9 0.20 I507 10 0.21 F508 10 66.02 1609delCA 10 Spain (Caucasian) V520F 10 Q493X 10 C524X 10 G480C 10 Q493R 10 1717-1G→A Int 10 0.58 R553X 11 0.73 G551D 11 1.64 G542X 11 2.42 R560T 11 Ͼ0.1 S549N 11 Q552X 11 Italy S549I 11 Israel (Arabs) A559T 11 African American R553G 11 R560K 11 1812-1G→A Int 11 A561E 12 E585X 12 Y563D 12 Y563N 12 1898ϩ1G→A Int 12 0.22 1898ϩ1G→C Int 12 2183AA→G 13 Italian 2184delA 13 Ͻ0.1 K710X 13 2143delT 13 Moscow (Russian) 2184InsA 13 1949del84 13 Spain (Spanish) 2176InsC 13 2043delG 13 2307insA 13 2789ϩ5G→A Int 14b Ͼ0.1 2869insG 15 S945L 15 Q890X 15 3120G→A 16 2067 Table I. continued Mutationa Exonb Frequency (%)c 3120ϩ1G→A Int 16 African American 3272-26A→G Int 17a R1066C 17b Portugal (Portugese) L1077P 17b R1070Q 17b Bulgarian W1089X 17b M1101K 17b Canada (Hutterite) R1070P 17b R1162X 19 0.29 3659delC 19 Ͼ0.1 3849G→A 19 3662delA 19 3791delC 19 3821delT 19 Russian Q1238X 19 S1235R 19 France, South S1196X 19 K1177R 19 3849ϩ10kbC→T Int 19 0.24 3849ϩ4A→G Int 19 W1282X 20 1.22 S1251N 20 Dutch, Belgian 3905insT 20 Swiss, Acadian, Amish G1244E 20 R1283M 20 Welsh W1282R 20 D1270N 20 S1255X 20 African American 4005ϩ1G→A Int 20 N1303K 21 1.34 W1316X 21 aMutations were chosen according to their frequencies (Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium, 1994; Zielenski and Tsui, 1995; Estivill et al., 1997). Login to comment
86 CFTR mutations in 92 men with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens Mutations CFTR mutation panels CF25 CF25 ϩ 5T ACMG25 ACMG25 ϩ 5T CF100 Mutations detected in ∆F508 39 39 39 39 39 CF25 mutation panel R117H 4 4 4 4 4 W1282X 4 4 4 4 4 G551D 3 3 3 3 3 G542X 1 1 1 1 1 N1303K 1 1 1 1 1 IVS8-polyT IVS8-5T 33 33 33 Additional mutations L206W 3 detected not in CF25 D1270N 2 mutation panel 1154InsTC 1 3272-26A→G 1 A455E 1 1 1 R334W 1 1 1 Q890X 1 Total 14 52 85 54 87 95 respectively, in the total number of patients with at least one mutation. Login to comment
91 CFTR genotypes in 92 men with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens Genotypesa CFTR mutation panelsb CF25 CF25 ϩ 5T ACMG25 ACMG25 ϩ 5T CF100 Two mutations ∆F508/5T 16 16 16 W1282X/5T 4 4 4 ∆F508/R117Hc 3 3 3 3 3 G542X/5T 1 1 1 G551D/5T 1 1 1 ∆F508/L206W 2 ∆F508/A455E 1 1 1 ∆F508/3272-26A→G 1 Q890X/5T 1 L206W/5T 1 D1270N/D1270N 1 5T/5T 1 1 1 Sub-total 3 26 4 27 33 One mutation ∆F508/ϩ 36 20 35 19 16 5T/ϩ 9 9 7 G551D/ϩ 3 2 3 2 2 G542X/ϩ 1 1 R117H/ϩ 1 1 1 1 1 N1303K/ϩ 1 1 1 1 1 W1282X/ϩ 4 4 R334W/ϩ 1 1 1 1154InsTC/ϩ 1 Sub-total 46 33 46 33 29 Total (%) 49 (53.3) 59 (64.1) 50 (54.3) 60 (65.2) 62 (67.4) No mutation (%) 43 (46.7) 33 (35.9) 42 (45.7) 32 (34.8) 30 (32.6) aMutations L206W, 3272-26A→G, Q890X, D1270N, 1154InsTC and 5T are not in either CF25 and ACMG25 panels, while A455E and R334W are not in CF25, but are part of ACMG25 panel. Login to comment

[hide] The I148T CFTR allele occurs on multiple haplotype... Genet Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;4(5):319-23. Rohlfs EM, Zhou Z, Sugarman EA, Heim RA, Pace RG, Knowles MR, Silverman LM, Allitto BA
The I148T CFTR allele occurs on multiple haplotypes: a complex allele is associated with cystic fibrosis.
Genet Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;4(5):319-23., [PMID:12394343]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To determine whether intragenic changes modulate the cystic fibrosis (CF) phenotype in individuals who are positive for the I148T allele. METHODS: The genes from individuals who carried at least one copy of the I148T allele were analyzed for additional changes that may be acting as genetic modifiers. RESULTS: Seven of eight individuals with a known or suspected diagnosis of CF who carried I148T in combination with a severe CF mutation also carried 3199del6. Eight apparently healthy adult individuals who were compound heterozygous for I148T and a severe CF mutation or homozygous for I148T did not carry the deletion ( = 0.0014). The I148T allele occurs on at least three haplotypes: an IVS-8 9T background, a 7T background, or a 9T + 3199del6 background. The 3199del6 allele was not identified in 386 non-CF chromosomes. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that I148T occurs on at least three haplotypes and the complex allele I148T + 9T + 3199del6 is associated with a classic CF phenotype.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
58 Diagnostic testing of individuals affected with CF, or suspected of having CF, identified eight individuals who were compound heterozygous for a severe mutation (⌬F508, N1303K, or Q890X) and I148T (Table 2). Login to comment
77 Table 2 3199del6 analysis in patients with a known or suspected diagnosis of CF and compound heterozygous for I148T and a severe CF mutation Indiv no. Indication for testing Ethnicity Age (yr) Mutation 1 Mutation 2 Intron 8 poly(T) 3199del6 17 Suspected CF NEC 4 ⌬F508 I148T 9, 9 pos 18 Suspected CF Caucasian, N. American 1 ⌬F508 I148T 9, 9 pos 19 Affected CF NEC Ͻ1 N1303K I148T 9, 9 pos 20 Suspected CF NEC 5 ⌬F508 I148T 9, 9 nega 22 Affected CF NEC 14 ⌬F508 I148T 9, 9 pos 39 Pancreatic steatorrhea NEC 3 ⌬F508 I148T 9, 9 pos 41 Suspected CF Hispanic 10 Q890X I148T 7, 9 pos 42 Affected CF NEC 20 ⌬F508 I148T 9, 9 pos NEC, Northern European Caucasian. Login to comment

[hide] High allelic heterogeneity between Afro-Brazilians... Genet Test. 2003 Fall;7(3):213-8. Raskin S, Pereira L, Reis F, Rosario NA, Ludwig N, Valentim L, Phillips JA 3rd, Allito B, Heim RA, Sugarman EA, Probst CM, Faucz F, Culpi L
High allelic heterogeneity between Afro-Brazilians and Euro-Brazilians impacts cystic fibrosis genetic testing.
Genet Test. 2003 Fall;7(3):213-8., [PMID:14641997]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by at least 1,000 different mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR). To determine the frequency of 70 common worldwide CFTR mutations in 155 Euro-Brazilian CF patients and in 38 Afro-Brazilian CF patients, we used direct PCR amplification of DNA from a total of 386 chromosomes from CF patients born in three different states of Brazil. The results show that screening for seventy mutations accounts for 81% of the CF alleles in Euro-Brazilians, but only 21% in the Afro-Brazilian group. We found 21 different mutations in Euro-Brazilians and only 7 mutations in Afro-Brazilians. The frequency of mutations and the number of different mutations detected in Euro-Brazilians are different from Northern European and North American populations, but similar to Southern European populations; in Afro-Brazilians, the mix of CF-mutations is different from those reported in Afro-American CF patients. We also found significant differences in detection rates between Euro-Brazilian (75%) and Afro-Brazilian CF patients (21%) living in the same state, Minas Gerais. These results, therefore, have implications for the use of DNA-based tests for risk assessment in heterogeneous populations like the Brazilians. Further studies are needed to identify the remaining CF mutations in the different populations and regions of Brazil.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
63 FREQUENCIES OF 70 CFTR MUTATIONS IN DIFFERENT STATES OF BRAZIL, BY CONTINENTA L GROUP CFTR mutations SC PR MG detected n n n n % n % N % DF508 53 39 54 146 47.1 8 10.5 154 39.9 G542X 6 9 8 23 7.4 1 1.3 24 6.2 R1162X 9 2 4 15 4.8 2 2.6 17 4.4 N1303K 5 5 0 10 3.2 0 0 10 2.6 R334W 5 1 4 10 3.2 0 0 10 2.6 G85E 2 2 4 8 2.6 1 1.3 9 2.3 1717-1G®A 1 3 2 6 1.9 0 0 6 1.6 W1282X 4 1 1 6 1.9 0 0 6 1.6 3849110kbC®T 1 3 1 5 1.6 0 0 5 1.3 R553X 0 2 0 2 0.7 0 0 2 0.5 1812-1G®A 0 1 3 4 1.3 1 1.3 5 1.3 2183AA®G 2 1 0 3 1.0 0 0 3 0.8 312011G®A 0 0 2 2 0.7 2 2.6 4 1.0 Y1092X 0 1 1 2 0.7 1 1.3 3 0.8 G551D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W1089X 0 0 1 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 6211G®T 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 Q1238X 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 711-1G®T 0 1 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 R347P 1 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 189811G®A 1 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 I507 0 0 1 1 0.3 0 0 1 0.3 Subtotal 91 73 86 250 80.7 16 21.1 266 68.9 Alleles with CFTR 5 27 28 60 19.4 60 79.0 120 31.1 mutations not detected Total 96 100 114 310 100.0 76 100.0 386 100.0 Detection rate (%) 94.8 73.0 75.4 250 80.7 16 21.1 266 68.9 The following 70 CFTR mutations were selected and tested on the basis of frequency in various populations, known association with CF, or predicted deleterious effect on the CFTR protein product; DF508, G542X, N1303K, G551D, R553X, DI507, A455E, A559T, C524X, D1270N, E60X, G178R, G330X, G85E, 2307insA, I148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P 2307insA, I148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P 2307insA, 1148T, K710X, P574H, Q1238X, Q493X, Q890X, R1158X, R1162X, R117H, R334W, R347H, R347P, R352Q, R560T, S1196X, S1255X, S364P, S549N, S549R, V520F, W1089X, W1282X, W1310X, W1316X, Y1092X, Y122X, Y563D, 1078delT,1677delTA,1717-1G-A,1812-1G-A,1898 1 1G-A, 2043delG,2183delAA-G, 2184delA, 2789 1 5G-A, 2869insG, 2909delT, 3120 1 1G-A, 3120G-A, 3358delAC, 3659delC, 3662delA, 3750delAG, 3791delC, 3821delT, 3849 1 10KbC-T, 3849 1 4A-G, 3905insT, 405 1 1G-A, 444delA, 556delA, 574delA, 621 1 1G-T, and 711 1 1G-T. aSC, Santa Catarina State; PR, Parana State; MG, Minas Gerais State; n, number of chromosomes. Login to comment

[hide] CFTR mutation distribution among U.S. Hispanic and... Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):392-9. Sugarman EA, Rohlfs EM, Silverman LM, Allitto BA
CFTR mutation distribution among U.S. Hispanic and African American individuals: evaluation in cystic fibrosis patient and carrier screening populations.
Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):392-9., [PMID:15371903]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We reviewed CFTR mutation distribution among Hispanic and African American individuals referred for CF carrier screening and compared mutation frequencies to those derived from CF patient samples. METHODS: Results from CFTR mutation analyses received from January 2001 through September 2003, were analyzed for four populations: Hispanic individuals with a CF diagnosis (n = 159) or carrier screening indication (n = 15,333) and African American individuals with a CF diagnosis (n = 108) or carrier screening indication (n = 8,973). All samples were tested for the same 87 mutation panel. RESULTS: In the Hispanic population, 42 mutations were identified: 30 in the patient population (77.5% detection rate) and 33 among carrier screening referrals. Five mutations not included in the ACMG/ACOG carrier screening panel (3876delA, W1089X, R1066C, S549N, 1949del84) accounted for 7.55% detection in patients and 5.58% among carriers. Among African American referrals, 33 different mutations were identified: 21 in the patient population (74.4% detection) and 23 in the carrier screening population. Together, A559T and 711+5G>A were observed at a detection rate of 3.71% in CF patients and 6.38% in carriers. The mutation distribution seen in both the carrier screening populations reflected an increased frequency of mutations with variable expression such as D1152H, R117H, and L206W. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed analysis of CFTR mutation distribution in the Hispanic and African American patient and carrier screening populations demonstrates that a diverse group of mutations is most appropriate for diagnostic and carrier screening in these populations. To best serve the increasingly diverse U.S. population, ethnic-specific mutations should be included in mutation panels.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
35 87 mutation panel The following mutations were included in the panel: ⌬F508, ⌬F311, ⌬I507, A455E, A559T, C524X, D1152H, D1270N, E60X, G178R, G330X, G480C, G542X, G551D, G85E, G91R, I148T, K710X, L206W, M1101K, N1303K, P574H, Q1238X, Q359K/T360K, Q493X, Q552X, Q890X, R1066C, R1158X, R1162X, R117C, R117H, R1283M, R334W, R347H, R347P, R352Q, R553X, R560T, S1196X, S1251N, S1255X, S364P, S549I, S549N, S549R, T338I, V520F, W1089X, W1282X, Y1092X, Y563D, 1078delT, 1161delC, 1609delCA, 1677delTA, 1717-1GϾA, 1812-1GϾA, 1898ϩ1GϾA, 1898ϩ5GϾT, 1949del84, 2043delG, 2143delT, 2183delAAϾG, 2184delA, 2307insA, 2789ϩ5GϾA, 2869insG, 3120ϩ1GϾA, 3120GϾA, 3659delC, 3662delA, 3791delC, 3821delT, 3849ϩ10kbCϾT, 3849ϩ4AϾG, 3905insT, 394delTT, 405ϩ1GϾA, 405ϩ3AϾC, 444delA, 574delA, 621ϩ1GϾT, 711ϩ1GϾT, 711ϩ5GϾA, 712-1GϾT, 3876delA CFTR mutation analysis Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes, buccal cell swabs, or bloodspots by Qiagen QIAmp 96 DNA Blood Kit. Specimens were tested for 87 mutations by a pooled allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridization method as previously described.16,17 Two multiplex chain reactions (PCR) were used to amplify 19 regions of the CFTR gene. Login to comment

[hide] Multimutational analysis of eleven cystic fibrosis... Clin Chem. 2004 Nov;50(11):2155-7. Farez-Vidal ME, Gomez-Llorente C, Blanco S, Morales P, Casals T, Gomez-Capilla JA
Multimutational analysis of eleven cystic fibrosis mutations common in the Mediterranean areas.
Clin Chem. 2004 Nov;50(11):2155-7., [PMID:15502086]

Abstract [show]

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
51 Two multiplex reactions were designed for the analysis of 11 mutations: multiplex 1 (M1) analyzed K710X, R1066C/R1066S, 2869 insG, and Q890X polymorphisms; and multiplex 2 (M2) analyzed L206W, 1609delCA, R1066L/R1066H, R709X, and 1811 ϩ 1.6Kb polymorphisms. Login to comment
72 Fig. 1A shows M1 multiplex analysis of a sample heterozygous for the Q890X mutation; the colored peaks correspond to the following wild-type alleles: 2869 insG (green), Q890X (black), K710X (green), and R1066C/S (black). Login to comment
83 (A), multiplex analysis (M1) of an individual heterozygous for the Q890X mutation. Login to comment
84 Peaks in the M1 multiplex correspond to the following mutations: 2869 insG, Q890X, K710X, and R1066C/S. Login to comment
85 Peaks sizes for the wild-type (WT) positions studied (nt) were as follows: for 2869 insG, 30.73-30.91; for Q890X, 36.04-36.33; for K710X, 41.34-41.66; for R1066C/S, 46.21-46.37. Login to comment

[hide] Pancreatitis among patients with cystic fibrosis: ... Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):e463-9. Epub 2005 Mar 16. De Boeck K, Weren M, Proesmans M, Kerem E
Pancreatitis among patients with cystic fibrosis: correlation with pancreatic status and genotype.
Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):e463-9. Epub 2005 Mar 16., [PMID:15772171]

Abstract [show]
OBJECTIVE: Pancreatitis is an infrequent complication among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). It has mainly been reported for patients with pancreatic sufficiency (PS). Previous studies involved only a small number of patients because they contained data from single centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pancreatitis in a large heterogeneous CF population, to determine the relationship with pancreatic function, and to assess whether pancreatitis is associated with specific CFTR mutations. METHODS: Physicians caring for patients with CF were approached through the CF Thematic Network or through the European Cystic Fibrosis Foundation newsletter. They were asked to provide data on their current patient cohort through a standardized questionnaire and to report how many patients they had ever diagnosed as having pancreatitis. A detailed questionnaire was then sent, to be filled out for all of their patients for whom pancreatitis had ever occurred. We defined pancreatitis as an episode of acute abdominal pain associated with serum amylase levels elevated above the ranges established by each participating center's laboratory. General clinical data included age, genotype, age at diagnosis of CF, sweat chloride concentrations, pancreatic status, biometric findings, and respiratory status. CFTR mutations were also reported according to the functional classification of classes I to V. Patients were categorized as having PS, pancreatic insufficiency (PI), or PI after an initial period of PS. PI was defined as a 72-hour stool fat loss of >7 g/day, fat absorption of <93%, or fecal elastase levels of <200 microg/g feces. Clinical data on pancreatitis included age at the first episode, amylase and lipase levels, possible triggers, and occurrence of relapses or complications. RESULTS: A total of 10071 patients with CF, from 29 different countries, who were undergoing follow-up monitoring in 2002 were surveyed. Among this group, pancreatitis had ever been diagnosed for 125 patients (1.24%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.46%). There was variability in the reported rates of pancreatitis for different countries. Twenty-six centers in 15 different countries sent detailed clinical data on their patients with pancreatitis and on their whole CF clinic. This involved 3306 patients with CF and 61 cases of pancreatitis, leading to a prevalence of 1.84% (95% CI: 1.39-2.30%). The mean age of the patients with pancreatitis ever was 24.4 years (SD: 10.8 years). The first episode of pancreatitis occurred at a mean age of 19.9 years (SD: 9.6 years). The median serum amylase level at the time of pancreatitis was 746 IU/L (interquartile range: 319-1630 IU/L), and the median lipase level was 577 IU/L (interquartile range: 229-1650 IU/L). The majority of patients had PS (34 of 61 patients, 56%; 95% CI: 43-68%). Pancreatitis occurred for 15 patients with PI (25%; 95% CI: 14-35%). Eight patients developed PI after initial PS. The occurrence of pancreatitis among patients with PS was 34 cases per 331 patients, ie, 10.27% (95% CI: 7.00-13.55%); the occurrence of pancreatitis among patients with PI was 15 cases per 2971 patients, ie, 0.5% (95% CI: 0.25-0.76%). The mean age (in 2002) of the CF cohort with pancreatitis did not differ between the PS and PI subgroups. The forced expiratory volume in 1 second was significantly lower among the patients with PI than among the patients with PS, ie, 65% (SEM: 7%) vs 79% (SEM: 4%). The mean age at the occurrence of pancreatitis and the amylase and lipase levels during pancreatitis were not different for patients with pancreatitis and PI versus PS. In the group with PS, 31 of 34 patients carried at least 1 class IV or V CFTR mutation. In the groups with PI and PI after PS, 5 of 15 patients and 3 of 8 patients, respectively, carried 2 class I, II, or III CFTR mutations. Relapses and/or evolution to chronic pancreatitis occurred for 42 patients. Pancreatitis preceded the diagnosis of CF in 18 of 61 cases. These patients were significantly older than the rest of the cohort, ie, age of 28.4 years (SEM: 3.4 years) vs 22.7 years (SEM: 1.3 years). Their median age at the diagnosis of CF was also significantly greater, ie, 21.5 years (interquartile range: 11.9-31 years) vs 7.6 years (interquartile range: 0.4-17.0 years). However, the ages at the occurrence of pancreatitis were similar, ie, 21.0 years (SEM: 3.0 years) vs 19.5 years (SEM: 1.2 years). CONCLUSIONS: This study of 10071 patients with CF from 29 different countries revealed an estimated overall occurrence of pancreatitis among patients with CF of 1.24% (95% CI: 1.02-1.46%). The incidence of pancreatitis was much higher among patients with PS. However, pancreatitis was also reported for 15 patients with PI from 11 centers in 9 different countries. A correct diagnosis of pancreatitis for the reported patients with PI was supported by amylase and lipase levels increased above 500 IU/L, similar to those for patients with PS and pancreatitis. A correct diagnosis of PI for these patients with pancreatitis was supported by the adequacy of the methods used. We chose the cutoff values used to distinguish between patients with PI and control subjects without gastrointestinal disease. For one half of the patients, the diagnosis of PI was established on the basis of low levels of stool elastase (mean: 97 mug/g stool). With a cutoff value of 200 microg/g stool, this noninvasive test has high sensitivity (>95%) and high specificity (>90%) to differentiate patients with PI from control subjects with normal pancreatic function. For the other one half of the patients with PI in the cohort, the pancreatic status was determined on the basis of the 3-day fecal fat balance, with the widely used cutoff value of >7 g of fat loss per day. The most likely reason for pancreatitis occurring among patients with PI is that some residual pancreatic tissue is present among these patients. Pancreatitis is a rare complication among patients with CF. It occurred for 1.24% (95% CI: 1.02-1.46%) of a large CF cohort. Pancreatitis occurs mainly during adolescence and young adulthood. It is much more common among patients with CF and PS (10.3%), but it can occur among patients with PI (0.5%). Pancreatitis can be the first manifestation of CF. Pancreatitis was reported for patients carrying a wide range of mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
171 Mutations Found Among Patients With CF and Pancreatitis PS PI PI after PS Not classified 3849ϩ10-kbCϾT*/F508del† (3) F508del†/F508del† F508del†/2789ϩ5GϾA† F508del†/3849ϩ10-kbCϾT* 3849ϩ10-kbCϾT*/W1282X† F508del†/I336K† F508del†/G628RϩGϾA† F508del†/unknown D1152H*/F508del† (2) F508del†/2789ϩ5GϾA† W1282X†/G85E† F508del†/S945L D1152H*/W1282X† G551D†/N1303K† F508del†/R117H*ϩ7T Unknown/unknown R334W*/F508del† (2) I507del†/G1069R† F508del†/3849ϩ10-kbCϾT* R334W*/G542X† F508del†/D1152H* (2) F508del†/R347P R334W*/Q890X F508del†/A455E* R1162X†/R334W* R117H*ϩ7T/L997F†ϩ7T F508del†/R1066H* R347H*/2118del4 R117H*/F508del† F508del†/S13F* P205S*/G542X† F508del†/1898ϩ3AϾG* D1270NϩR74W*/I507del† Y1092X†/A455E* R352Q*/1812-1GϾA F508del†/I1005R L206W*/F508del† G542X†/unknown 5T*/W1282X† Refused testing 5T*/F508del† 5T*/7T* 7T*/F508del† 2789ϩ5GϾA†/unknown W1282X†/unknown (3) F508del†/unknown (6) F508del†/V232D† 2789ϩ5GϾA†/N1303K† 2347delG†/1341GϾA† Patients are grouped according to pancreatic status. Login to comment

[hide] Genotype-phenotype correlation for pulmonary funct... Thorax. 2005 Jul;60(7):558-63. de Gracia J, Mata F, Alvarez A, Casals T, Gatner S, Vendrell M, de la Rosa D, Guarner L, Hermosilla E
Genotype-phenotype correlation for pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis.
Thorax. 2005 Jul;60(7):558-63., [PMID:15994263]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Since the CFTR gene was cloned, more than 1000 mutations have been identified. To date, a clear relationship has not been established between genotype and the progression of lung damage. A study was undertaken of the relationship between genotype, progression of lung disease, and survival in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: A prospective cohort of adult patients with CF and two CFTR mutations followed up in an adult cystic fibrosis unit was analysed. Patients were classified according to functional effects of classes of CFTR mutations and were grouped based on the CFTR molecular position on the epithelial cell surface (I-II/I-II, I-II/III-V). Spirometric values, progression of lung disease, probability of survival, and clinical characteristics were analysed between groups. RESULTS: Seventy four patients were included in the study. Patients with genotype I-II/I-II had significantly lower current spirometric values (p < 0.001), greater loss of pulmonary function (p < 0.04), a higher proportion of end-stage lung disease (p < 0.001), a higher risk of suffering from moderate to severe lung disease (odds ratio 7.12 (95% CI 1.3 to 40.5)) and a lower probability of survival than patients with genotype I-II/III, I-II/IV and I-II/V (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of class I or II mutations on both chromosomes is associated with worse respiratory disease and a lower probability of survival.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
209 To study the decline in pulmonary function between groups the ANOVA method (repeated measures) was used with baseline and current spirometric values as dependent variables, genotype groups as the independent variable, and age and evolution time as Table 1 CFTR mutation according to functional classification Class Molecular dysfunction Mutation I Defective protein production G542X, 711+1GRT, 1609delCA, R1162X, 1717-8GRA, W1282X, 1782delA, Q890X, 1898+3ARG, CFTRdele19, 936delTA II Defective protein processing F508del, N1303K, I507del, R1066C III Defective protein regulation D1270N, G551D IV Defective protein conductance L206W, R334W, R117H, R347H, D836Y, P205S V Partially defective production or processing 2789+5GRA, 1811+1.6kbARG, 3849+10kbCRT, 3272+26GRA Table 2 Groups based on genotype in CF adult patients Functional classes Genotype No of subjects I-I G542X/W1282X 1 R1162X/1898+3ARG 1 R1162X/CFTRdele19 1 I-II F508del/G542X 5 F508del/711+1GRT 2 F508del/1717-8GRA 1 F508del/936delTA 1 F508del/R1162X 1 N1303K/1609delCA 1 I-III G542X/D1270N+R74W 1 711+1G-T/G551D 1 I-IV G542X/P205S 1 Q890X/R334W 1 1609delCA/R347H 1 I-V G542X/2789+5GRT 2 G542X/1811+1.6kbARG 1 1782delA/2789+5GRA 1 1609delCA/1811+1.6kbARG 1 II-II F508del/F508del 21 F508del/N1303K 1 F508del/R1066C 1 II-III F508del/D1270N+R74W 1 I507del/D1270N+R74W 1 II-IV F508del/L206W 4 F508del/R334W 3 F508del/R117H 3 F08del/R347H 2 F508del/D836Y 1 II-V F508del/2789+5GRA 5 F508del/3849+10kbCRT 2 F508del/1811+1.6kbARG 2 F508del/3272+26GRA 1 N1303K/1811+1.6kbARG 1 N1303K/2789+5GRA 1 adjusted variables. Login to comment

[hide] Comprehensive genetic analysis of the cystic fibro... Genet Med. 2006 Sep;8(9):557-62. Kammesheidt A, Kharrazi M, Graham S, Young S, Pearl M, Dunlop C, Keiles S
Comprehensive genetic analysis of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator from dried blood specimens--implications for newborn screening.
Genet Med. 2006 Sep;8(9):557-62., [PMID:16980811]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: In the United States, approximately 1/3,700 babies is born with cystic fibrosis each year. The >1,300 documented sequence variants pose a challenge for detection of cystic fibrosis through genetic screening. To investigate whether comprehensive characterization of the cystic fibrosis gene is feasible using dried newborn blood specimens, we modified the whole blood Ambry Test: CF and determined its sensitivity by testing DNA from individuals with cystic fibrosis who still had unknown mutations after commercial mutation panel testing. METHODS: DNA from 42 archived newborn dried blood specimens of affected Hispanic, African-American and Caucasian individuals in California was analyzed by temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis screening and targeted sequencing, and by gross deletion analysis. RESULTS: Excluding two specimens that could not be analyzed due to poor DNA quality, we report a 100% sensitivity and clinical detection rate in the remaining 40 patients. Eighty-three mutations representing 40 different variants were detected, including 8 novel mutations. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis-based full sequence analysis and targeted sequencing from DNA in newborn blood specimens. The Ambry Test: CF, as an additional step in cystic fibrosis newborn screening models, can be used to dramatically reduce the number of cystic fibrosis carrier sweat test referrals.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
98 In states with single specimenmodels,originalspecimensaretestedforthepresenceof themostcommonmutation,deltaF508,and/orotherdeleterious Table 1 Genotype data from panel testing and comprehensive Ambry TestTM : CF analysis Case Ethnicity ABI-31 Mutation 1 ABI-31 Mutation 2 Genzyme-87 Mutation 1 Genzyme-87 Mutation 2 Ambry Mutation 1 Ambry Mutation 2 Ambry Mutation 3 1 Hispanic delF508a 4382delAa 2 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508a 1248ϩ1GϾAa 3 African-American N/I N/I N/I N/I M150K CFTRdele17A,17Bb 4 Hispanic G542X N/I G542X N/I G542Xa 1288insTAa 5 African-American N/I N/I 3120ϩ1GϾA N/I 3120ϩ1GϾAa Q98Xa 3849؉72G>A 6 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508a 2289del10ins5a 7c Hispanic N/I N/I N/I N/I H199Ya 406-1GϾAa 8 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508a CFTRdele2,3(21kbb 9 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508a 2105-2117del13insAGAAAa 10 Hispanic G542X N/I G542X N/I G542X M952I Y914X 11 Hispanic N/I N/I N/I N/I 663delT L558S 12 Hispanic N/I N/I delF311 N/I delF311a 406-1GϾAa 13 Hispanic N/I N/I 2055del9insAa 2055del9insAa 14 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 2055del9insA 15 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 E257X 16 Hispanic N/I N/I N/I N/I V232D V232D 17 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 H199Y 18 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 4160insGGGG 19 Caucasian delF508 N/I delF508 297-1GϾA 20 Hispanic 2183delAAϾG N/I 2183delAAϾG N/I 2183de1AAϾG 3500-2AϾG 21 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 S492F 22 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 935delA 23 Caucasian R1162X N/I R1162X N/I R1162X 3940delG 24 Hispanic 711ϩ1GϾT N/I 711ϩ1GϾT T465N 25 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 406-1GϾA 26 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 2055del9insA 27 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 V232D 28 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 S1235R 29 Hispanic G542X N/I G542X N/I G542X 297-1GϾA 30 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 Q1100P 31 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 W216X 32 Hispanic N/I N/I N/I N/I 406-1GϾA H199Y 33 Hispanic N/I N/I N/I N/I 3272-26AϾG R75X 34 Hispanic N/I N/I Q890X N/I Q890X 2055del9insA 35 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 W216X 36 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 H199Y 37 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 1288insTA I1027T 38 Hispanic G542X N/I G542X N/I G542X 663delT 39 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 N/I delF508 1288insTA 40 Hispanic delF508 N/I delF508 1288insTA mutations using mutation panels. Login to comment

[hide] N-terminal CFTR missense variants severely affect ... Hum Mutat. 2008 May;29(5):738-49. Gene GG, Llobet A, Larriba S, de Semir D, Martinez I, Escalada A, Solsona C, Casals T, Aran JM
N-terminal CFTR missense variants severely affect the behavior of the CFTR chloride channel.
Hum Mutat. 2008 May;29(5):738-49., [PMID:18306312]

Abstract [show]
Over 1,500 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene sequence variations have been identified in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and related disorders involving an impaired function of the CFTR chloride channel. However, detailed structure-function analyses have only been established for a few of them. This study aimed evaluating the impact of eight N-terminus CFTR natural missense changes on channel behavior. By site-directed mutagenesis, we generated four CFTR variants in the N-terminal cytoplasmic tail (p.P5L, p.S50P, p.E60K, and p.R75Q) and four in the first transmembrane segment of membrane-spanning domain 1 (p.G85E/V, p.Y89C, and p.E92K). Immunoblot analysis revealed that p.S50P, p.E60K, p.G85E/V, and p.E92K produced only core-glycosylated proteins. Immunofluorescence and whole cell patch-clamp confirmed intracellular retention, thus reflecting a defect of CFTR folding and/or trafficking. In contrast, both p.R75Q and p.Y89C had a glycosylation pattern and a subcellular distribution comparable to the wild-type CFTR, while the percentage of mature p.P5L was considerably reduced, suggesting a major biogenesis flaw on this channel. Nevertheless, whole-cell chloride currents were recorded for all three variants. Single-channel patch-clamp analyses revealed that the channel activity of p.R75Q appeared similar to that of the wild-type CFTR, while both p.P5L and p.Y89C channels displayed abnormal gating. Overall, our results predict a major impact of the CFTR missense variants analyzed, except p.R75Q, on the CF phenotype and highlight the importance of the CFTR N-terminus on channel physiology.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
133 Genotype^Phenotype Correlation in the N-Terminal CFTR MissenseVariants Under StudyÃ Missense varianta Phenotype Second allele (number of patients)b p.P5L CF p.F508del (1), p.P205S (1) p.S50P CBAVD p.F508del (1), p.E115del (1) p.E60K CF p.G542X (1), p.I507del (1) p.R75Q HT p.F508del (3), p.E725K (1) B p.R347H (1), p.R75Q (1), n.i. (4) Br c.1584G4A (2), c.1210-7_1210-6delTT (1), n.i.(3) NT p.F508del (1) CP c.1584G4A (1), n.i. (3) MI n.i. (1) CUAVD n.i. (2) OZ n.i. (2) Normal p.R75Q (1), c.2052_2053insA (1), n.i. (1) p.G85E CF p.F508del (8), p.G542X (2), p.I507del (1), c.580-1G4T (1), p.G85E (1), c.1477_ 1478delCA (1) CBAVD p.G576A (1) HT p.L997F (1),WT (1) p.G85V CF p.F508del (2), p.G542X (2), p.Y1092X (1), c.265715G4A (1), p.A1006E, c.1210-7_1210- 6delTT (1), n.i. (1) p.Y89C CF n.i. (1)c p.E92K CF p.F508del (2), p.Q890X (1), p.L206W (1) CBAVD c.1210-7_1210-6delTT (1) ÃThe recommendations for mutation nomenclature (www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/) were used to name CFTR gene sequence variations at both the nucleotide level and the protein level. Login to comment

[hide] CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis patients from Mu... Clin Genet. 2009 Dec;76(6):577-9. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Moya-Quiles MR, Mondejar-Lopez P, Pastor-Vivero MD, Gonzalez-Gallego I, Juan-Fita MJ, Egea-Mellado JM, Carbonell P, Casals T, Fernandez-Sanchez A, Sanchez-Solis M, Glover G
CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis patients from Murcia region (southeastern Spain): implications for genetic testing.
Clin Genet. 2009 Dec;76(6):577-9. Epub 2009 Oct 21., [PMID:19845690]

Abstract [show]

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
17 of chromosomes Frequency (%) F508dela E.10 67 36.8 G542Xa E.11 22 12.1 A1006E E.17a 10 5.5 K710X E.13 10 5.5 2789+5G>Aa I.14b 9 4.9 L206W E.6a 7 3.8 1811+1.6kbA>G I.11 6 3.3 R334Wa E.7 5 2.7 2869insG E.15 5 2.7 I507dela E.10 4 2.2 N1303Ka E.21 4 2.2 R347Pa E.7 3 1.6 711+1G>Ta I.5 3 1.6 3849+10kbC>Ta I.19 3 1.6 Q890X E.15 3 1.6 R117Ha E.4 2 1.1 R1162Xa E.19 2 1.1 2183AA>Ga E.13 2 1.1 A561E E.12 2 1.1 R560G E.11 2 1.1 1717-1G>Aa I.10 1 0.5 E1308X E.21 1 0.5 E585X E.12 1 0.5 L997F E.17a 1 0.5 1677delTA E.10 1 0.5 R1158X E.19 1 0.5 W202X E.6a 1 0.5 R74W+D1270N E.3 + E.20 1 0.5 G576A+R668C E.12 + E.13 1 0.5 Unknown 2 1.1 Total 182 100 aCFTR mutations identified with the PCR OLA CF Genotyping Assay . Login to comment

[hide] Identification of the second CFTR mutation in pati... Asian J Androl. 2010 Nov;12(6):819-26. Epub 2010 Jul 26. Giuliani R, Antonucci I, Torrente I, Grammatico P, Palka G, Stuppia L
Identification of the second CFTR mutation in patients with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens undergoing ART protocols.
Asian J Androl. 2010 Nov;12(6):819-26. Epub 2010 Jul 26., [PMID:20657600]

Abstract [show]
Congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens (CBAVD) is a manifestation of the mildest form of cystic fibrosis (CF) and is characterized by obstructive azoospermia in otherwise healthy patients. Owing to the availability of assisted reproductive technology, CBAVD patients can father children. These fathers are at risk of transmitting a mutated allele of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, responsible for CF, to their offspring. The identification of mutations in both CFTR alleles in CBAVD patients is a crucial requirement for calculating the risk of producing a child with full-blown CF if the female partner is a healthy CF carrier. However, in the majority of CBAVD patients, conventional mutation screening is not able to detect mutations in both CFTR alleles, and this difficulty hampers the execution of correct genetic counselling. To obtain information about the most represented CFTR mutations in CBAVD patients, we analysed 23 CBAVD patients, 15 of whom had a single CFTR mutation after screening for 36 mutations and the 5T allele. The search for the second CFTR mutation in these cases was performed by using a triplex approach: (i) first, a reverse dot-blot analysis was performed to detect mutations with regional impact; (ii) next, multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification assays were conducted to search for large rearrangements; and (iii) finally, denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography was used to search for point mutations in the entire coding region. Using these approaches, the second CFTR mutation was detected in six patients, which increased the final detection rate to 60.8%.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
122 The missense I105N mutation, which was detected in one case by DHPLC, has been previously reported in one patient with full-blown CF in compound heterozygosity with the Q890X mutation (Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Database, Mutation Details) [8]. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in an ethnically d... Clin Chem. 2011 Jun;57(6):841-8. Epub 2011 Apr 7. Rohlfs EM, Zhou Z, Heim RA, Nagan N, Rosenblum LS, Flynn K, Scholl T, Akmaev VR, Sirko-Osadsa DA, Allitto BA, Sugarman EA
Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in an ethnically diverse US population.
Clin Chem. 2011 Jun;57(6):841-8. Epub 2011 Apr 7., [PMID:21474639]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cystic fibrosis (CF) and the frequency of specific disease-causing mutations vary among populations. Affected individuals experience a range of serious clinical consequences, notably lung and pancreatic disease, which are only partially dependent on genotype. METHODS: An allele-specific primer-extension reaction, liquid-phase hybridization to a bead array, and subsequent fluorescence detection were used in testing for carriers of 98 CFTR [cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (ATP-binding cassette sub-family C, member 7)] mutations among 364 890 referred individuals with no family history of CF. RESULTS: One in 38 individuals carried one of the 98 CFTR mutations included in this panel. Of the 87 different mutations detected, 18 were limited to a single ethnic group. African American, Hispanic, and Asian individuals accounted for 33% of the individuals tested. The mutation frequency distribution of Caucasians was significantly different from that of each of these ethnic groups (P < 1 x 10(1)). CONCLUSIONS: Carrier testing using a broad mutation panel detects differences in the distribution of mutations among ethnic groups in the US.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
131 Four mutations (p.S1255X, p.G330X, c.313delA, p.S364P) were identified only in African Americans, 8 mutations (p.G178R, p.T338I, c.262_ 263delTT, p.M1101K, c.442delA, p.K710X, p.P574H, p.Q1238X)wereidentifiedonlyinCaucasians,and3mu- tations (c.580-1GϾT, c.531delT, p.Q890X) were identified only in Hispanics. Login to comment

[hide] Detection of CFTR mutations using temporal tempera... Electrophoresis. 2004 Aug;25(15):2593-601. Wong LJ, Alper OM
Detection of CFTR mutations using temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis.
Electrophoresis. 2004 Aug;25(15):2593-601., [PMID:15300780]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF), caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, is one of the most common autosomal recessive diseases with variable incidences and mutation spectra among different ethnic groups. Current commercially available mutation panels designed for the analysis of known recurrent mutations have a detection rate between 38 to 95%, depending upon the ethnic background of the patient. We describe the application of a novel mutation detection method, temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE), to the study of the molecular genetics of Hispanic CF patients. TTGE effectively identified numerous rare and novel mutations and polymorphisms. One interesting observation is that the majority of the novel mutations are splice site, frame shift, or nonsense mutations that cause severe clinical phenotypes. Our data demonstrate that screening of the 27 exons and intron/exon junctions of the CFTR gene by TTGE greatly improves the molecular diagnosis of Hispanic CF patients.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
94 Lanes 1-5 are PCR products of exon 10; lane 2, homozygous p.phe508del, lane 3, heterozygous p.phe508del; lane 4, heterozygous c.1540A.G (p.met470val); lane 5, heterozygous p.phe508del and p.met470val; lane 7, exon15 homozygous c. 2800C.T (p.Q890X); lane 9, exon 17b heterozygous c.3313G.C (p.G1061R); lane 11, exon 19 heterozygous c.3601-65C.A; lane 13, exon 6a heterozygous c.875140 A.G; lane 15, exon 13 heterozygous c.1924del7bp. Login to comment
133 Identification of rare and novel mutations and polymorphisms Base substitution Mutation Exon or intron Homozygote or heterozygote Polymorphism or mutation # Alleles identified 1 c.124_146del23bp Frameshift 1 Heterozygote Mutation 1 2 c.296+2T>A Splice Int 2 Heterozygote Mutation 1 3 c.296+28A/G Int 2 Homozygote Polymorphism 2 4 c.355CT p.R75X 3 Heterozygote Mutation 2 5 c.360_365insT Frameshift 3 Heterozygote Mutation 1 6 c.379_381insT Frameshift 3 Heterozygote Mutation 1 7 c.406-1G>A Splice Int 4 Heterozygote Mutation 2 8 c.424C.T p.Q98X 4 Heterozygote Mutation 1 9 c.425A.G p.Q98R 4 Heterozygote Mutation 3 10 c.586A.G p.M152V 4 Homozygote Mutation 2 11 c.663delT Frameshift 5 Heterozygote Mutation 3 12 c.667C>A p.Q179K 5 Heterozygote Mutation, 1 13 c.745C.T p.P205S 6a Heterozygote Mutation 5 14 c.875140A/G 6a Heterozygote Polymorphism 11 15 c.935delA Frameshift 6b Heterozygote Mutation 2 16 c.124811G.A Splice Int 7 Heterozygote Mutation 2 17 c.1285ins TA Frameshift 8 Heterozygote Mutation 4 Homozygote Mutation 2 18 c.1342+196C/T Int 8 Heterozygote Polymorphism 4 Homozygote 2 19 c.1461insAGAT Frameshift 9 Heterozygote Mutation 1 20 c.1525-61A/G 10 Heterozygote Polymorphism 22 21 c.1529C.A/G p.S466X 10 Heterozygote Mutation 1 22 c.1607C.T p.S492F 10 Heterozygote Mutation 3 23 c.1814C.T p.A561E 12 Heterozygote Mutation 1 24 c.189813A.G Splice Int 12 Heterozygote Mutation 1 25 c.18981152T/A Int 12 Heterozygote Polymorphism 5 26 c.1924del 7bp Frameshift 13 Heterozygote Mutation 1 27 c.1949del84 Frameshift 13 Heterozygote Mutation 1 28 c.2055del9toA Frameshift 13 Homozygote Mutation 2 29 c.2105_2117 Frameshift 13 Heterozygote Mutation 4 del13insAGAAA 30 c.2108delA Frameshift 13 Heterozygote Mutation 1 31 c.2184insA Frameshift 13 Heterozygote Mutation 2 32 c.2184delA Frameshift 13 Heterozygote Mutation 1 33 c.2289_2295 Frameshift 13 Heterozygote Mutation 1 del7insGT 34 c.2694T.G p.T854T 14a Heterozygote Polymorphism 10 35 c.2752+12G/C Int 14a Heterozygote Polymorphism 2 36 c.2800C.T p.Q890X 15 Homozygote Mutation 2 37 c.3171delC Frameshift 17a Heterozygote Mutation 1 38 c.3179T>C p.F1016S 17a Heterozygote Mutation 1 39 c.3199del 6bp Frameshift 17a Heterozygote Mutation 1 40 c.3212T.C p.I1027T 17a Heterozygote Mutation 1 41 c.3272-26A.G Splice Int17a Heterozygote Mutation 4 42 c.3271delGG Frameshift 17a Heterozygote Mutation 1 43 c.3313G.C p.G1061R 17b Heterozygote Mutation 1 44 c.3328C.T p.R1066C 17b Heterozygote Mutation 2 45 c.3362T.C p.L1077P 17b Heterozygote Mutation 1 46 c.3431A.C p.Q1100P 17b Heterozygote Mutation 1 47 c.3500-2A>T Splice Int 17b Heterozygote Mutation 1 48 c.3743G.A p.W1204X 19 Heterozygote Mutation 1 Homozygote Mutation 2 49 c.3601-65C/A Int 19 Heterozygote Polymorphism 14 50 c.3863G.A p.G1244E 20 Heterozygote Mutation 3 Table 3. Login to comment

[hide] Spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in cystic f... Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Mar;71(Pt 2):194-201. Alonso MJ, Heine-Suner D, Calvo M, Rosell J, Gimenez J, Ramos MD, Telleria JJ, Palacio A, Estivill X, Casals T
Spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in cystic fibrosis patients of Spanish ancestry.
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Mar;71(Pt 2):194-201., [PMID:17331079]

Abstract [show]
We analyzed 1,954 Spanish cystic fibrosis (CF) alleles in order to define the molecular spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene in Spanish CF patients. Commercial panels showed a limited detection power, leading to the identification of only 76% of alleles. Two scanning techniques, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and single strand conformation polymorphism/hetroduplex (SSCP/HD), were carried out to detect CFTR sequence changes. In addition, intragenic markers IVS8CA, IVS8-6(T)n and IVS17bTA were also analyzed. Twelve mutations showed frequencies above 1%, p.F508del being the most frequent mutation (51%). We found that eighteen mutations need to be studied to achieve a detection level of 80%. Fifty-one mutations (42%) were observed once. In total, 121 disease-causing mutations were identified, accounting for 96% (1,877 out of 1,954) of CF alleles. Specific geographic distributions for the most common mutations, p.F508del, p.G542X, c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G and c.1609delCA, were confirmed. Furthermore, two other relatively common mutations (p.V232D and c.2789 + 5G > A) showed uneven geographic distributions. This updated information on the spectrum of CF mutations in Spain will be useful for improving genetic testing, as well as to facilitate counselling in people of Spanish ancestry. In addition, this study contributes to defining the molecular spectrum of CF in Europe, and corroborates the high molecular mutation heterogeneity of Mediterranean populations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
45 (%) p.F508del # E.10 1009 (51.74) p.G542X # E.11 150 (7.69) p.N1303K # E.21 57 (2.92) c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G I.11 36 (1.84) p.R334W # E.7 35 (1.79) p.L206W E.6a 32 (1.64) c.711 + 1G > T # I.5 31 (1.58) p.Q890X E.15 28 (1.43) p.R1162X # E.19 25 (1.28) c.2789 + 5G > A # I.14b 24 (1.23) p.R1066C E.17b 23 (1.18) p.I507del # E.10 21 (1.07) c.1609delCA E.10 18 (0.92) c.712-1G > T I.5 18 (0.92) c.3272-26A > G I.17a 18 (0.92) c.2183AA > G # E.13 16 (0.82) p.G85E # E.3 15 (0.77) c.2869insG E.15 15 (0.77) p.W1282X # E.20 15 (0.77) p.V232D E.6a 14 (0.71) p.A1006E * E.17a 12 (0.61) c.2184insA E.13 11 (0.56) p.K710X E.13 11 (0.56) TOTAL (n = 23) 1,634 (83.72) * , the complex allele [p.A1006E; p.V562I; IVS8-6(5T)] #, CF mutations identified with the Celera Diagnosis Cystic Fibrosis v2 genotyping assay and the Inno-Lipa CFTR12, CFTR17 + Tn Samples with microsatellite haplotypes 16/45-46-47 (IVS8CA/IVS17bTA) were submitted to direct analysis of the c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G mutation, which was found mainly associated with the 16-46 haplotype. Login to comment
53 #, CF mutations identified with the Celera Diagnosis Cystic Fibrosis v2 genotyping assay and the Inno-Lipa CFTR12, CFTR17 + Tn p.L206W, p.Q890X and p.R1066C, presented with frequencies above 1%, while 51 mutations (42%) were found only once (Table 2). Login to comment
76 It is not surprising that four of the common mutations, presenting with frequencies above 1% (c.1811 + 1.6kbA > G, p.L206W, p.Q890X and p.R1066C), were undetected by these panels (Table 1). Login to comment
105 Our impression is that Table 3 Common CF mutations identified in this study and in several Latin American populations Mutation This study Hispanic1 Mexico2 Colombia3 Brazil4 Argentina5 Chile6 p.F508del 51.7 51.6 40.7 41.8 48.4 58.6 45.0 p.G542X 7.7 4.0 6.2 3.8 8.8 4.1 7.0 p.N1303K 2.9 0.8 2.0 0.5 2.5 2.7 - c.1811 + 1,6kbA > G 1.8 - - 6.5 - 0.9 - p.R334W 1.8 1.6 - 0.5 2.5 1.1 2.0 p.L206W 1.6 - - - 0.6 - - c.711 + 1G > T 1.6 - - - - - - p.Q890X 1.4 - - - - - - p.R1162X 1.3 0.8 - 1.1 2.5 0.4 2.0 c.2789 + 5G > A 1.2 - - 0.5 0.3 0.7 - p.R1066C 1.2 1.6 - 0.5 - 0.2 - p.I507del 1.0 - 2.6 - - 0.7 - c.2183AA > G 0.8 - 1.0 - 0.2 - p.G85E 0.7 0.8 0.5 - 1.3 0.7 - p.W1282X 0.7 0.8 - 1.1 1.3 2.7 5.0 c.3849 + 10kbC > T 0.4 4.0 0.5 - - 0.9 3.0 p.S549N - 2.4 2.6 - - - - c.3120 + 1G > A - 1.6 - 0.5 - - - c.3876delA - 5.6 - - - - - c.406-1G > A - 1.6 1.5 - - - - c.935delA - 1.6 1.0 - - - - p.R75X - 0.8 1.5 - - - - c.2055del9 - - 1.0 - - - - p.I506T - - 1.0 - - - - c.3199del6 - - 1.0 - - - - p.S549R 0.4 - - 2.2 - 0.2 - c.1717-1G > A 0.2 - - - 0.3 1.1 - p.G551D 0.2 0.8 0.5 - - - 1.0 p.R553X 0.4 - 0.5 - 0.6 0.2 1.0 No. Login to comment

[hide] Prospective and parallel assessments of cystic fib... Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Aug;171(8):1223-9. Epub 2012 May 12. Krulisova V, Balascakova M, Skalicka V, Piskackova T, Holubova A, Paderova J, Krenkova P, Dvorakova L, Zemkova D, Kracmar P, Chovancova B, Vavrova V, Stambergova A, Votava F, Macek M Jr
Prospective and parallel assessments of cystic fibrosis newborn screening protocols in the Czech Republic: IRT/DNA/IRT versus IRT/PAP and IRT/PAP/DNA.
Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Aug;171(8):1223-9. Epub 2012 May 12., [PMID:22581207]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening disease for which early diagnosis following newborn screening (NBS) improves the prognosis. We performed a prospective assessment of the immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT)/DNA/IRT protocol currently in use nationwide, versus the IRT/pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) and IRT/PAP/DNA CF NBS protocols. Dried blood spots (DBS) from 106,522 Czech newborns were examined for IRT concentrations. In the IRT/DNA/IRT protocol, DNA-testing was performed for IRT >/= 65 ng/mL. Newborns with IRT >/= 200 ng/mL and no detected cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) mutations were recalled for a repeat IRT. In the same group of newborns, for both parallel protocols, PAP was measured in DBS with IRT >/= 50 ng/mL. In PAP-positive newborns (i.e., >/=1.8 if IRT 50-99.9 or >/=1.0 if IRT >/= 100, all in ng/mL), DNA-testing followed as part of the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol. Newborns with at least one CFTR mutation in the IRT/DNA/IRT and IRT/PAP/DNA protocols; a positive PAP in IRT/PAP; or a high repeat IRT in IRT/DNA/IRT were referred for sweat testing. CONCLUSION: the combined results of the utilized protocols led to the detection of 21 CF patients, 19 of which were identified using the IRT/DNA/IRT protocol, 16 using IRT/PAP, and 15 using IRT/PAP/DNA. Decreased cut-offs for PAP within the IRT/PAP protocol would lead to higher sensitivity but would increase false positives. Within the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol, decreased PAP cut-offs would result in high sensitivity, an acceptable number of false positives, and would reduce the number of DNA analyses. Thus, we concluded that the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol would represent the most suitable protocol in our conditions.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
81 According to the protocol, this result indicated the sequencing of the Table 1 Parallel comparison of CF NBS protocols IRT/DNAa /IRT IRT/PAP IRT/PAP/DNAa Newborns screened (N) 106,522 106,522 106,522 IRT positives (N; %) 1,158 (1.09) 3,155 (2.96) 3,155 (2.96) PAP positives (N; %) - 260 (0.24) 260 (0.24) Median age (range) at the availability of DNA-testinga results (days) 36 (9-222b ) - 36 (9-222b ) 1 and/or 2 CF mutations detected (N; %) 76 (0.07) - 27 (0.03) Recalled newborns for repeated IRT examination (N; %) 47 (0.04) - - Positive CF NBS (N; %) 123 (0.12) 260 (0.24) 27 (0.03) Positive IRT in newborns recalled for repeated examination (N) 1 - - ST indicated (N; %) 77 (0.07) 260 (0.24) 27 (0.03) ST carried out (N; % of indicated ST) 72c (93.51) 204c (78.46) 24c (88.89) CF carriers (N) 55 - 12 Prevalence of CF carriers 1 in 21 - 1 in 22 Diagnosed CF patients (N) 19 16 15 False positives based on performed ST (N; % of all cases screened) 99d (0.09) 188 (0.18) 9 (0.01) Newborns with equivocal diagnosis [F508del/R117H-IVS-8 T(7) and ST<30 mmol/L; N] 2 - 0 False negatives (N) 2 5 6 Total of CF patients detected (N) 21e Median age (range) at diagnosis (days) 36 (9-57)e CF prevalence 1 in 5,072e Sensitivity (TP/TP+FN) 0.9048 0.7619 0.7142 Specificity (TN/TN+FP) 0.9991 0.9982 0.9999 PPV (TP/TP+FP) 0.1610 0.0784 0.625 N number, % of all cases screened, TP true positives, FN false negatives, TN true negatives, FP false positives, PPV positive predictive value, ST sweat test a CF-causing mutations covered by Elucigene assays ("legacy" nomenclature) with the CF-EU1Tm accounting for: p.Arg347Pro (R347P), c.2657+ 5G>A (2789+5G>A), c.2988+1G>A (3120+1G>A), c.579+1G>T (711+1G>T), p.Arg334Trp (R334W), p.Ile507del (I507del), p.Phe508del (F508del), c.3718-2477C>T (3849+10kbC>T), p.Phe316LeufsX12 (1078delT), p.Trp1282X (W1282X), p.Arg560Thr (R560T), p.Arg553X (R553X), p.Gly551Asp (G551D), p.Met1101Lys (M1101K), p.Gly542X (G542X), p.Leu1258PhefsX7 (3905insT), p.Ser1251Asn (S1251N), c.1585-1G>A (1717-1G>A), p.Arg117His (R117H), p.Asn1303Lys (N1303K), p.Gly85Glu (G85E), c.1766+1G>A (1898+1G>A), p.Lys684AsnfsX38 (2184delA), p.Asp1152His (D1152H), c.54-5940_273+10250del (CFTRdele2,3), p.Pro67Leu (P67L), p.Glu60X (E60X), p.Lys1177SerfsX15 (3659delC), c.489+1G>T (621+1G>T), p.Ala455Glu (A455E), p.Arg1162X (R1162X), p.Leu671X (2143delT), c.1210-12T[n] (IVS8-T(n) variant), including additional mutations in the CF-EU2Tm : p.Gln890X (Q890X), p.Tyr515X (1677delTA), p.Val520Phe (V520F), c.3140-26A>G (3272-26A>G), p.Leu88IlefsX22 (394delTT), p.Arg1066Cys (R1066C), p.Ile105SerfsX2 (444delA), p.Tyr1092X (C>A) (Y1092X(C>A)), p.Arg117Cys (R117C), p.Ser549Asn (S549N), p.Ser549ArgT>G (S549R T>G), p.Tyr122X (Y122X), p.Arg1158X (R1158X), p.Leu206Trp (L206W), c.1680-886A>G (1811+1.6kbA>G), p.Arg347His (R347H), p.Val739TyrfsX16 (2347delG) and p.Trp846X (W846X) b failed DNA isolation from DBS, including repetition of DNA-testing c deceased patient or non-compliance with referrals (five CF carriers in IRT/DNA/IRT, 56 newborns in IRT/PAP, three CF carriers in IRT/PAP/DNA) d comprising newborns with repeated IRT (47 newborns) e aggregate data from all protocols entire CFTR coding region in both newborns, and led to the identification of p.Ile336Lys (I336K) and p.Glu1104Lys (E1104K) mutations. Login to comment

[hide] Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic ... J Cyst Fibros. 2008 May;7(3):179-96. Castellani C, Cuppens H, Macek M Jr, Cassiman JJ, Kerem E, Durie P, Tullis E, Assael BM, Bombieri C, Brown A, Casals T, Claustres M, Cutting GR, Dequeker E, Dodge J, Doull I, Farrell P, Ferec C, Girodon E, Johannesson M, Kerem B, Knowles M, Munck A, Pignatti PF, Radojkovic D, Rizzotti P, Schwarz M, Stuhrmann M, Tzetis M, Zielenski J, Elborn JS
Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice.
J Cyst Fibros. 2008 May;7(3):179-96., [PMID:18456578]

Abstract [show]
It is often challenging for the clinician interested in cystic fibrosis (CF) to interpret molecular genetic results, and to integrate them in the diagnostic process. The limitations of genotyping technology, the choice of mutations to be tested, and the clinical context in which the test is administered can all influence how genetic information is interpreted. This paper describes the conclusions of a consensus conference to address the use and interpretation of CF mutation analysis in clinical settings. Although the diagnosis of CF is usually straightforward, care needs to be exercised in the use and interpretation of genetic tests: genotype information is not the final arbiter of a clinical diagnosis of CF or CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein related disorders. The diagnosis of these conditions is primarily based on the clinical presentation, and is supported by evaluation of CFTR function (sweat testing, nasal potential difference) and genetic analysis. None of these features are sufficient on their own to make a diagnosis of CF or CFTR-related disorders. Broad genotype/phenotype associations are useful in epidemiological studies, but CFTR genotype does not accurately predict individual outcome. The use of CFTR genotype for prediction of prognosis in people with CF at the time of their diagnosis is not recommended. The importance of communication between clinicians and medical genetic laboratories is emphasized. The results of testing and their implications should be reported in a manner understandable to the clinicians caring for CF patients.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
1236 Table 1 Geographical distribution of the most common mutations E60X Southern European S549N Indian CFTR Slavic - Eastern European G551D United Kingdom, Central Europe R75X Southern European, US-Hispanic Q552X Southern European, Italian 394delTT Nordic - Baltic sea region R553X Central European G85E Southern Europe A559T African-American 406-1GNA US-Hispanic R560T Northern Irish R117H European-derived populations 1811+1.6kbANG Spanish, US-Hispanic R117C Northern European 1898+1GNA United Kingdom, Central Europe 621+1GNT Southern European 1898+5GNT East Asian populations 711+1GNT French, French Canadian 2143delT Slavic - Eastern European 711+5GNA US-Hispanic 2183delAANG Southern Europe, Middle Eastern, Iranian, Latin American L206W Spanish and US-Hispanic 2184delA European-derived populations V232D Spanish and US-Hispanic 2789+5GNA European-derived populations 1078delT French Brittany Q890X Southern European R334W Southern European, Latin American 3120+1GNA African, Arabian, African-American, Southern Europe 1161delC Indian 3272-26ANG European-derived populations R347P European-derived, Latin America 3659delC Scandinavian R347H Turkish 3849+10kbCNT Ashkenazi-Jewish, Southern European, Middle Eastern, Iranian, Indian A455E Dutch R1066C Southern European 1609delCA Spanish, US-Hispanic Y1092X (CNA) Southern European I506T Southern European, Spanish M1101K US-Hutterite I507del European-derived populations 3905insT Swiss F508del European-derived populations D1152H European-derived populations 1677delTA Southern European, Middle Eastern R1158X Southern European 1717-GNA European-derived populations R1162X Italian, Amerindian, Latin America V520F Irish S1251N European-derived populations G542X Southern European, Mediterranean W1282X Ashkenazi-Jewish, Middle Eastern S549R(TNG) Middle Eastern N1303K Southern European, Middle Eastern Legend: these alleles occur with a frequency superior to 0.1% in selected populations. Login to comment
1239 Table 1 Geographical distribution of the most common mutations E60X Southern European S549N Indian CFTR Slavic - Eastern European G551D United Kingdom, Central Europe R75X Southern European, US-Hispanic Q552X Southern European, Italian 394delTT Nordic - Baltic sea region R553X Central European G85E Southern Europe A559T African-American 406-1GNA US-Hispanic R560T Northern Irish R117H European-derived populations 1811+1.6kbANG Spanish, US-Hispanic R117C Northern European 1898+1GNA United Kingdom, Central Europe 621+1GNT Southern European 1898+5GNT East Asian populations 711+1GNT French, French Canadian 2143delT Slavic - Eastern European 711+5GNA US-Hispanic 2183delAANG Southern Europe, Middle Eastern, Iranian, Latin American L206W Spanish and US-Hispanic 2184delA European-derived populations V232D Spanish and US-Hispanic 2789+5GNA European-derived populations 1078delT French Brittany Q890X Southern European R334W Southern European, Latin American 3120+1GNA African, Arabian, African-American, Southern Europe 1161delC Indian 3272-26ANG European-derived populations R347P European-derived, Latin America 3659delC Scandinavian R347H Turkish 3849+10kbCNT Ashkenazi-Jewish, Southern European, Middle Eastern, Iranian, Indian A455E Dutch R1066C Southern European 1609delCA Spanish, US-Hispanic Y1092X (CNA) Southern European I506T Southern European, Spanish M1101K US-Hutterite I507del European-derived populations 3905insT Swiss F508del European-derived populations D1152H European-derived populations 1677delTA Southern European, Middle Eastern R1158X Southern European 1717-GNA European-derived populations R1162X Italian, Amerindian, Latin America V520F Irish S1251N European-derived populations G542X Southern European, Mediterranean W1282X Ashkenazi-Jewish, Middle Eastern S549R(TNG) Middle Eastern N1303K Southern European, Middle Eastern Legend: these alleles occur with a frequency superior to 0.1% in selected populations. Login to comment

[hide] Genotyping microarray for the detection of more th... J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):375-87. Schrijver I, Oitmaa E, Metspalu A, Gardner P
Genotyping microarray for the detection of more than 200 CFTR mutations in ethnically diverse populations.
J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):375-87., [PMID:16049310]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF), which is due to mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene, is a common life-shortening disease. Although CF occurs with the highest incidence in Caucasians, it also occurs in other ethnicities with variable frequency. Recent national guidelines suggest that all couples contemplating pregnancy should be informed of molecular screening for CF carrier status for purposes of genetic counseling. Commercially available CF carrier screening panels offer a limited panel of mutations, however, making them insufficiently sensitive for certain groups within an ethnically diverse population. This discrepancy is even more pronounced when such carrier screening panels are used for diagnostic purposes. By means of arrayed primer extension technology, we have designed a genotyping microarray with 204 probe sites for CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutation detection. The arrayed primer extension array, based on a platform technology for disease detection with multiple applications, is a robust, cost-effective, and easily modifiable assay suitable for CF carrier screening and disease detection.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
51 Complete List of Mutations Detectable with the CF APEX Assay CFTR location Amino acid change Nucleotide change 1 E 1 Frameshift 175delC 2 E 2,3 Frameshift del E2, E3 3 E 2 W19C 189 GϾT 4 E 2 Q39X 247 CϾT 5 IVS 2 Possible splicing defect 296 ϩ 12 TϾC 6 E 3 Frameshift 359insT 7 E 3 Frameshift 394delTT 8 E 3 W57X (TAG) 302GϾA 9 E 3 W57X (TGA) 303GϾA 10 E 3 E60X 310GϾT 11 E 3 P67L 332CϾT 12 E 3 R74Q 353GϾA 13 E 3 R75X 355CϾT 14 E 3 G85E 386GϾA 15 E 3 G91R 403GϾA 16 IVS 3 Splicing defect 405 ϩ 1GϾA 17 IVS 3 Possible splicing defect 405 ϩ 3AϾC 18 IVS 3 Splicing defect 406 - 1GϾA 19 E 4 E92X 406GϾT 20 E 4 E92K 406GϾA 21 E 4 Q98R 425AϾG 22 E 4 Q98P 425AϾC 23 E 4 Frameshift 444delA 24 E 4 Frameshift 457TATϾG 25 E 4 R117C 481CϾT 26 E 4 R117H 482GϾA 27 E 4 R117P 482GϾC 28 E 4 R117L 482GϾT 29 E 4 Y122X 498TϾA 30 E 4 Frameshift 574delA 31 E 4 I148T 575TϾC 32 E 4 Splicing defect 621GϾA 33 IVS 4 Splicing defect 621 ϩ 1GϾT 34 IVS 4 Splicing defect 621 ϩ 3AϾG 35 E 5 Frameshift 624delT 36 E 5 Frameshift 663delT 37 E 5 G178R 664GϾA 38 E 5 Q179K 667CϾA 39 IVS 5 Splicing defect 711 ϩ 1GϾT 40 IVS 5 Splicing defect 711 ϩ 1GϾA 41 IVS 5 Splicing defect 712 - 1GϾT 42 E 6a H199Y 727CϾT 43 E 6a P205S 745CϾT 44 E 6a L206W 749TϾG 45 E 6a Q220X 790CϾT 46 E 6b Frameshift 935delA 47 E 6b Frameshift 936delTA 48 E 6b N287Y 991AϾT 49 IVS 6b Splicing defect 1002 - 3TϾG 50 E 7 ⌬F311 3-bp del between nucleotides 1059 and 1069 51 E 7 Frameshift 1078delT 52 E 7 Frameshift 1119delA 53 E 7 G330X 1120GϾT 54 E 7 R334W 1132CϾT 55 E 7 I336K 1139TϾA 56 E 7 T338I 1145CϾT 57 E 7 Frameshift 1154insTC 58 E 7 Frameshift 1161delC 59 E 7 L346P 1169TϾC 60 E 7 R347H 1172GϾA 61 E 7 R347P 1172GϾC 62 E 7 R347L 1172GϾT 63 E 7 R352Q 1187GϾA 64 E 7 Q359K/T360K 1207CϾA and 1211CϾA 65 E 7 S364P 1222TϾC 66 E 8 Frameshift 1259insA 67 E 8 W401X (TAG) 1334GϾA 68 E 8 W401X (TGA) 1335GϾA 69 IVS 8 Splicing changes 1342 - 6 poly(T) variants 5T/7T/9T 70 IVS 8 Splicing defect 1342 - 2AϾC Table 1. Continued CFTR location Amino acid change Nucleotide change 71 E 9 A455E 1496CϾA 72 E 9 Frameshift 1504delG 73 E 10 G480C 1570GϾT 74 E 10 Q493X 1609CϾT 75 E 10 Frameshift 1609delCA 76 E 10 ⌬I507 3-bp del between nucleotides 1648 and 1653 77 E 10 ⌬F508 3-bp del between nucleotides 1652 and 1655 78 E 10 Frameshift 1677delTA 79 E 10 V520F 1690GϾT 80 E 10 C524X 1704CϾA 81 IVS 10 Possible splicing defect 1717 - 8GϾA 82 IVS 10 Splicing defect 1717 - 1GϾA 83 E 11 G542X 1756GϾT 84 E 11 G551D 1784GϾA 85 E 11 Frameshift 1784delG 86 E 11 S549R (AϾC) 1777AϾC 87 E 11 S549I 1778GϾT 88 E 11 S549N 1778GϾA 89 E 11 S549R (TϾG) 1779TϾG 90 E 11 Q552X 1786CϾT 91 E 11 R553X 1789CϾT 92 E 11 R553G 1789CϾG 93 E 11 R553Q 1790GϾA 94 E 11 L558S 1805TϾC 95 E 11 A559T 1807GϾA 96 E 11 R560T 1811GϾC 97 E 11 R560K 1811GϾA 98 IVS 11 Splicing defect 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG 99 IVS 11 Splicing defect 1812 - 1GϾA 100 E 12 Y563D 1819TϾG 101 E 12 Y563N 1819TϾA 102 E 12 Frameshift 1833delT 103 E 12 D572N 1846GϾA 104 E 12 P574H 1853CϾA 105 E 12 T582R 1877CϾG 106 E 12 E585X 1885GϾT 107 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 5GϾT 108 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾA 109 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾC 110 IVS 12 Splicing defect 1898 ϩ 1GϾT 111 E 13 Frameshift 1924del7 112 E 13 del of 28 amino acids 1949del84 113 E 13 I618T 1985TϾC 114 E 13 Frameshift 2183AAϾG 115 E 13 Frameshift 2043delG 116 E 13 Frameshift 2055del9ϾA 117 E 13 D648V 2075TϾA 118 E 13 Frameshift 2105-2117 del13insAGAA 119 E 13 Frameshift 2108delA 120 E 13 R668C 2134CϾT 121 E 13 Frameshift 2143delT 122 E 13 Frameshift 2176insC 123 E 13 Frameshift 2184delA 124 E 13 Frameshift 2184insA 125 E 13 Q685X 2185CϾT 126 E 13 R709X 2257CϾT 127 E 13 K710X 2260AϾT 128 E 13 Frameshift 2307insA 129 E 13 V754M 2392GϾA 130 E 13 R764X 2422CϾT 131 E 14a W846X 2670GϾA 132 E 14a Frameshift 2734delGinsAT 133 E 14b Frameshift 2766del8 134 IVS 14b Splicing defect 2789 ϩ 5GϾA 135 IVS 14b Splicing defect 2790 - 2AϾG 136 E 15 Q890X 2800CϾT 137 E 15 Frameshift 2869insG 138 E 15 S945L 2966CϾT 139 E 15 Frameshift 2991del32 140 E 16 Splicing defect 3120GϾA interrogation: ACCAACATGTTTTCTTTGATCTTAC 3121-2A3G,T S; 5Ј-ACCAACATGTTTTCTTTGATCTTAC A GTTGTTATTAATTGTGATTGGAGCTATAG-3Ј; CAACAA- TAATTAACACTAACCTCGA 3121-2A3G,T AS. Login to comment
150 Primers Generated to Create Synthetic Templates That Serve As Positive Mutation Controls Primer name Sense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Name Antisense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј 175delC synt F T(15)ATTTTTTTCAGGTGAGAAGGTGGCCA 175delC synt R T(15)ATTTGGAGACAACGCTGGCCTTTTCC W19C synt F T(15)TACCAGACCAATTTTGAGGAAAGGAT W19C synt R T(15)ACAGCTAAAATAAAGAGAGGAGGAAC Q39X synt F T(15)TAAATCCCTTCTGTTGATTCTGCTGA Q39X synt R T(15)AGTATATGTCTGACAATTCCAGGCGC 296 ϩ 12TϾC synt F T(15)CACATTGTTTAGTTGAAGAGAGAAAT 296 ϩ 12TϾC synt R T(15)GCATGAACATACCTTTCCAATTTTTC 359insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATGTTCTAT 359insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAACATCGCCGAAGGGCATTAA E60X synt F T(15)TAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAAAATCCTAA E60X synt R T(15)ATCTATCCCATTCTCTGCAAAAGAAT P67L synt F T(15)TTAAACTCATTAATGCCCTTCGGCGA P67L synt R T(15)AGATTTTTCTTTGAAGCCAGCTCTCT R74Q synt F T(15)AGCGATGTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATG R74Q synt R T(15)TGAAGGGCATTAATGAGTTTAGGATT R75X synt F T(15)TGATGTTTTTTCTGGAGATTTATGTT R75X synt R T(15)ACCGAAGGGCATTAATGAGTTTAGGA W57X(TAG) synt F T(15)AGGATAGAGAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAA W57X(TAG) synt R T(15)TATTCTCTGCAAAAGAATAAAAAGTG W57X(TGA) synt F T(15)AGATAGAGAGCTGGCTTCAAAGAAAA W57X(TGA) synt R T(15)TCATTCTCTGCAAAAGAATAAAAAGT G91R synt F T(15)AGGGTAAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTC G91R synt R T(15)TTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCATAGAAC 405 ϩ 1GϾA synt F T(15)ATAAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTCATT 405 ϩ 1GϾA synt R T(15)TCCCTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCATAG 405 ϩ 3AϾC synt F T(15)CAGGATCTCATTTGTACATTCATTAT 405 ϩ 3AϾC synt R T(15)GACCCCTAAATATAAAAAGATTCCAT 406 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AGAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTC 406 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAAT E92X synt F T(15)TAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTCT E92X synt R T(15)ACTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAA E92K synt F T(15)AAAGTCACCAAAGCAGTACAGCCTCT E92K synt R T(15)TCTACAAAAGGGGAAAAACAGAGAAA 444delA synt F T(15)GATCATAGCTTCCTATGACCCGGATA 444delA synt R T(15)ATCTTCCCAGTAAGAGAGGCTGTACT 574delA synt F T(15)CTTGGAATGCAGATGAGAATAGCTAT 574delA synt R T(15)AGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGGCTGGG 621GϾA synt F T(15)AGTAATACTTCCTTGCACAGGCCCCA 621GϾA synt R T(15)TTTCTTATAAATCAAACTAAACATAG Q98P synt F T(15)CGCCTCTCTTACTGGGAAGAATCATA Q98P synt R T(15)GGTACTGCTTTGGTGACTTCCTACAA 457TATϾG synt F T(15)GGACCCGGATAACAAGGAGGAACGCT 457TATϾG synt R T(15)CGGAAGCTATGATTCTTCCCAGTAAG I148T synt F T(15)CTGGAATGCAGATGAGAATAGCTATG I148T synt R T(15)GTGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGGCTGG 624delT synt F T(15)CTTAAAGCTGTCAAGCCGTGTTCTAG 624delT synt R T(15)TAAGTCTAAAAGAAAAATGGAAAGTT 663delT synt F T(15)ATGGACAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCC 663delT synt R T(15)CATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACACGGC G178R synt F T(15)AGACAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCCAA G178R synt R T(15)TAATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACACGG Q179K synt F T(15)AAACTTGTTAGTCTCCTTTCCAACAA Q179K synt R T(15)TTCCAATACTTATTTTATCTAGAACA 711 ϩ 5GϾA synt F T(15)ATACCTATTGATTTAATCTTTTAGGC 711 ϩ 5GϾA synt R T(15)TTATACTTCATCAAATTTGTTCAGGT 712 - 1GϾT synt F T(15)TGGACTTGCATTGGCACATTTCGTGT 712 - 1GϾT synt R T(15)TATGGAAAATAAAAGCACAGCAAAAAC H199Y synt F T(15)TATTTCGTGTGGATCGCTCCTTTGCA H199Y synt R T(15)TATGCCAATGCTAGTCCCTGGAAAATA P205S synt F T(15)TCTTTGCAAGTGGCACTCCTCATGGG P205S synt R T(15)TAAGCGATCCACACGAAATGTGCCAAT L206W synt F T(15)GGCAAGTGGCACTCCTCATGGGGCTA L206W synt R T(15)TCAAGGAGCGATCCACACGAAATGTGC Q220X synt F T(15)TAGGCGTCTGCTTTCTGTGGACTTGG Q220X synt R T(15)TATAACAACTCCCAGATTAGCCCCATG 936delTA synt F T(15)AATCCAATCTGTTAAGGCATACTGCT 936delTA synt R T(15)TGATTTTCAATCATTTCTGAGGTAATC 935delA synt F T(15)GAAATATCCAATCTGTTAAGGCATAC 935delA synt R T(15)TATTTCAATCATTTCTGAGGTAATCAC N287Y synt F T(15)TACTTAAGACAGTAAGTTGTTCCAAT N287Y synt R T(15)TATTCAATCATTTTTTCCATTGCTTCT 1002 - 3TϾG synt F T(15)GAGAACAGAACTGAAACTGACTCGGA 1002 - 3TϾG synt R T(15)TCTAAAAAACAATAACAATAAAATTCA 1154insTC syntwt F T(15)ATCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTGCGCAT 1154insTC syntwt R T(15)TTGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTTTCCGGA 1154insTC syntmt F T(15)TCTCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTGCGCAT 1154insTC syntmt R T(15)TAGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTTTCCGGA DF311 mt syntV1 F T(15)CCTTCTTCTCAGGGTTCTTTGTGGTG dF311 mt syntV1 R T(15)GAGAAGAAGGCTGAGCTATTGAAGTATC G330X synt F T(15)TGAATCATCCTCCGGAAAATATTCAC G330X synt R T(15)ATTTGATTAGTGCATAGGGAAGCACA S364P synt F T(15)CCTCTTGGAGCAATAAACAAAATACA S364P synt R T(15)GGTCATACCATGTTTGTACAGCCCAG Q359K/T360K mt synt F T(15)AAAAAATGGTATGACTCTCTTGGAGC Q359K/T360K mt synt R T(15)TTTTTTACAGCCCAGGGAAATTGCCG 1078delT synt F T(15)CTTGTGGTGTTTTTATCTGTGCTTCC 1078delT synt R T(15)CAAGAACCCTGAGAAGAAGAAGGCTG 1119delA synt F T(15)CAAGGAATCATCCTCCGGAAAATATT 1119delA synt R T(15)CTTGATTAGTGCATAGGGAAGCACAG 1161delC synt F T(15)GATTGTTCTGCGCATGGCGGTCACTC 1161delC synt R T(15)TCAGAATGAGATGGTGGTGAATATTT T338I synt F T(15)TCACCATCTCATTCTGCATTGTTCTG T338I synt R T(15)ATGAATATTTTCCGGAGGATGATTCC R352Q synt F T(15)AGCAATTTCCCTGGGCTGTACAAACA R352Q synt R T(15)TGAGTGACCGCCATGCGCAGAACAAT L346P synt F T(15)CGCGCATGGCGGTCACTCGGCAATTT L346P synt R T(15)GGAACAATGCAGAATGAGATGGTGGT 1259insA synt F T(15)AAAAAGCAAGAATATAAGACATTGGA 1259insA synt R T(15)TTTTTGTAAGAAATCCTATTTATAAA W401X(TAG)mtsynt F T(15)AGGAGGAGGTCAGAATTTTTAAAAAA W401X(TAG)mtsynt R T(15)TAGAAGGCTGTTACATTCTCCATCAC W401X(TGA) synt F T(15)AGAGGAGGTCAGAATTTTTAAAAAAT W401X(TGA) synt R T(15)TCAGAAGGCTGTTACATTCTCCATCA 1342 - 2AϾC synt F T(15)CGGGATTTGGGGAATTATTTGAGAAA 1342 - 2AϾC synt R T(15)GGTTAAAAAAACACACACACACACAC 1504delG synt F T(15)TGATCCACTGTAGCAGGCAAGGTAGT 1504delG synt R T(15)TCAGCAACCGCCAACAACTGTCCTCT G480C synt F T(15)TGTAAAATTAAGCACAGTGGAAGAAT G480C synt R T(15)ACTCTGAAGGCTCCAGTTCTCCCATA C524X synt F T(15)ACAACTAGAAGAGGTAAGAAACTATG C524X synt R T(15)TCATGCTTTGATGACGCTTCTGTATC V520F synt F T(15)TTCATCAAAGCAAGCCAACTAGAAGA V520F synt R T(15)AGCTTCTGTATCTATATTCATCATAG 1609delCA synt F T(15)TGTTTTCCTGGATTATGCCTGGCACC 1609delCA synt R T(15)CAGAACAGAATGAAATTCTTCCACTG 1717 - 8GϾA synt F T(15)AGTAATAGGACATCTCCAAGTTTGCA 1717 - 8GϾA synt R T(15)TAAAAATAGAAAATTAGAGAGTCACT 1784delG synt F T(15)AGTCAACGAGCAAGAATTTCTTTAGC 1784delG synt R T(15)ACTCCACTCAGTGTGATTCCACCTTC A559T synt F T(15)ACAAGGTGAATAACTAATTATTGGTC A559T synt R T(15)TTAAAGAAATTCTTGCTCGTTGACCT Q552X synt F T(15)TAACGAGCAAGAATTTCTTTAGCAAG Q552X synt R T(15)AACCTCCACTCAGTGTGATTCCACCT S549R(AϾC) synt F T(15)CGTGGAGGTCAACGAGCAAGAATTTC S549R(AϾC) synt R T(15)GCAGTGTGATTCTACCTTCTCCAAGA S549R(TϾG) synt F T(15)GGGAGGTCAACGAGCAAGTATTTC S549R(TϾG) synt R T(15)CCTCAGTGTGATTCCACCTTCTCCAA L558S synt F T(15)CAGCAAGGTGAATAACTAATTATTGG L558S synt R T(15)GAAGAAATTCTCGCTCGTTGACCTCC 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG synt F T(15)GTAAGTAAGGTTACTATCAATCACAC 1811 ϩ 1.6 kb AϾG synt R T(15)CATCTCAAGTACATAGGATTCTCTGT 1812 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AAGCAGTATACAAAGATGCTGATTTG 1812 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTAAAAAGAAAATGGAAATTAAATTA D572N synt F T(15)AACTCTCCTTTTGGATACCTAGATGT D572N synt R T(15)TTAATAAATACAAATCAGCATCTTTG P574H synt F T(15)ATTTTGGATACCTAGATGTTTTAACA P574H synt R T(15)TGAGAGTCTAATAAATACAAATCAGC 1833delT synt F T(15)ATTGTATTTATTAGACTCTCCTTTTG 1833delT synt R T(15)CAATCAGCATCTTTGTATACTGCTCT Table 4. Continued Primer name Sense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Name Antisense strand 5Ј 3 3Ј Y563D synt F T(15)GACAAAGATGCTGATTTGTATTTATT Y563D synt R T(15)CTACTGCTCTAAAAAGAAAATGGAAA T582R synt F T(15)GAGAAAAAGAAATATTTGAAAGGTAT T582R synt R T(15)CTTAAAACATCTAGGTATCCAAAAGG E585X synt F T(15)TAAATATTTGAAAGGTATGTTCTTTG E585X synt R T(15)ATTTTTCTGTTAAAACATCTAGGTAT 1898 ϩ 5GϾT synt F T(15)TTTCTTTGAATACCTTACTTATATTG 1898 ϩ 5GϾT synt R T(15)AATACCTTTCAAATATTTCTTTTTCT 1924del7 synt F T(15)CAGGATTTTGGTCACTTCTAAAATGG 1924del7 synt R T(15)CTGTTAGCCATCAGTTTACAGACACA 2055del9ϾA synt F T(15)ACATGGGATGTGATTCTTTCGACCAA 2055del9ϾA synt R T(15)TCTAAAGTCTGGCTGTAGATTTTGGA D648V synt F T(15)TTTCTTTCGACCAATTTAGTGCAGAA D648V synt R T(15)ACACATCCCATGAGTTTTGAGCTAAA K710X synt F T(15)TAATTTTCCATTGTGCAAAAGACTCC K710X synt R T(15)ATCGTATAGAGTTGATTGGATTGAGA I618T synt F T(15)CTTTGCATGAAGGTAGCAGCTATTTT I618T synt R T(15)GTTAATATTTTGTCAGCTTTCTTTAA R764X synt F T(15)TGAAGGAGGCAGTCTGTCCTGAACCT R764X synt R T(15)ATGCCTGAAGCGTGGGGCCAGTGCTG Q685X synt F T(15)TAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGGAGAGTT Q685X synt R T(15)ATTTTTTTGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACA R709X synt F T(15)TGAAAATTTTCCATTGTGCAAAAGAC R709X synt R T(15)ATATAGAGTTGATTGGATTGAGAATA V754M synt F T(15)ATGATCAGCACTGGCCCCACGCTTCA V754M synt R T(15)TGCTGATGCGAGGCAGTATCGCCTCT 1949del84 synt F T(15)AAAAATCTACAGCCAGACTTTATCTC 1949del84 synt R T(15)TTTTTAGAAGTGACCAAAATCCTAGT 2108delA synt F T(15)GAATTCAATCCTAACTGAGACCTTAC 2108delA synt R T(15)ATTCTTCTTTCTGCACTAAATTGGTC 2176insC synt F T(15)CCAAAAAAACAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGGAGAG 2176insC synt R T(15)GGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACAGGAGCAT 2184delA synt F T(15)CAAAAAACAATCTTTTAAACAGACTGG 2184delA synt R T(15)GTTTTTTGTTTCTGTCCAGGAGACAG 2105-2117 del13 synt F T(15)AAACTGAGACCTTACACCGTTTCTCA 2105-2117 del13 synt R T(15)TTTCTTTCTGCACTAAATTGGTCGAA 2307insA synt F T(15)AAAGAGGATTCTGATGAGCCTTTAGA 2307insA synt R T(15)TTTCGATGCCATTCATTTGTAAGGGA W846X synt F T(15)AAACACATACCTTCGATATATTACTGTCCAC W846X synt R T(15)TCATGTAGTCACTGCTGGTATGCTCT 2734G/AT synt F T(15)TTAATTTTTCTGGCAGAGGTAAGAAT 2734G/AT synt R T(15)TTAAGCACCAAATTAGCACAAAAATT 2766del8 synt F T(15)GGTGGCTCCTTGGAAAGTGAGTATTC 2766del8 synt R T(15)CACCAAAGAAGCAGCCACCTGGAATGG 2790 - 2AϾG synt F T(15)GGCACTCCTCTTCAAGACAAAGGGAA 2790 - 2AϾG synt R T(15)CGTAAAGCAAATAGGAAATCGTTAAT 2991del32 synt F T(15)TTCAACACGTCGAAAGCAGGTACTTT 2991del32 synt R T(15)AAACATTTTGTGGTGTAAAATTTTCG Q890X synt F T(15)TAAGACAAAGGGAATAGTACTCATAG Q890X synt R T(15)AAAGAGGAGTGCTGTAAAGCAAATAG 2869insG synt F T(15)GATTATGTGTTTTACATTTACGTGGG 2869insG synt R T(15)CACGAACTGGTGCTGGTGATAATCAC 3120GϾA synt F T(15)AGTATGTAAAAATAAGTACCGTTAAG 3120GϾA synt R T(15)TTGGATGAAGTCAAATATGGTAAGAG 3121 - 2AϾT synt F T(15)TGTTGTTATTAATTGTGATTGGAGCT 3121 - 2AϾT synt R T(15)AGTAAGATCAAAGAAAACATGTTGGT 3132delTG synt F T(15)TTGATTGGAGCCATAGCAGTTGTCGC 3132delTG synt R T(15)AATTAATAACAACTGTAAGATCAAAG 3271delGG synt F T(15)ATATGACAGTGAATGTGCGATACTCA 3271delGG synt R T(15)ATTCAGATTCCAGTTGTTTGAGTTGC 3171delC synt F T(15)ACCTACATCTTTGTTGCAACAGTGCC 3171delC synt R T(15)AGGTTGTAAAACTGCGACAACTGCTA 3171insC synt F T(15)CCCCTACATCTTTGTTGCTACAGTGC 3171insC synt R T(15)GGGGTTGTAAAACTGCGACAACTGCT 3199del6 synt F T(15)GAGTGGCTTTTATTATGTTGAGAGCATAT 3199del6 synt R T(15)CCACTGGCACTGTTGCAACAAAGATG M1101K synt F T(15)AGAGAATAGAAATGATTTTTGTCATC M1101K synt R T(15)TTTTGGAACCAGCGCAGTGTTGACAG G1061R synt F T(15)CGACTATGGACACTTCGTGCCTTCGG G1061R synt R T(15)GTTTTAAGCTTGTAACAAGATGAGTG R1066L synt F T(15)TTGCCTTCGGACGGCAGCCTTACTTT R1066L synt R T(15)AGAAGTGTCCATAGTCCTTTTAAGCT R1070P synt F T(15)CGCAGCCTTACTTTGAAACTCTGTTC R1070P synt R T(15)GGTCCGAAGGCACGAAGTGTCCATAG L1077P synt F T(15)CGTTCCACAAAGCTCTGAATTTACAT L1077P synt R T(15)GGAGTTTCAAAGTAAGGCTGCCGTCC W1089X synt F T(15)AGTTCTTGTACCTGTCAACACTGCGC W1089X synt R T(15)TAGTTGGCAGTATGTAAATTCAGAGC L1093P synt F T(15)CGTCAACACTGCGCTGGTTCCAAATG L1093P synt R T(15)GGGTACAAGAACCAGTTGGCAGTATG W1098R synt F T(15)CGGTTCCAAATGAGAATAGAAATGAT W1098R synt R T(15)GGCGCAGTGTTGACAGGTACAAGAAC Q1100P synt F T(15)CAATGAGAATAGAAATGATTTTTGTC Q1100P synt R T(15)GGGAACCAGCGCAGTGTTGACAGGTA D1152H synt F T(15)CATGTGGATAGCTTGGTAAGTCTTAT D1152H synt R T(15)GTATGCTGGAGTTTACAGCCCACTGC R1158X synt F T(15)TGATCTGTGAGCCGAGTCTTTAAGTT R1158X synt R T(15)ACATCTGAAATAAAAATAACAACATT S1196X synt F T(15)GACACGTGAAGAAAGATGACATCTGG S1196X synt R T(15)CAATTCTCAATAATCATAACTTTCGA 3732delA synt F T(15)GGAGATGACATCTGGCCCTCAGGGGG 3732delA synt R T(15)CTCCTTCACGTGTGAATTCTCAATAA 3791delC synt F T(15)AAGAAGGTGGAAATGCCATATTAGAG 3791delC synt R T(15)TTGTATTTTGCTGTGAGATCTTTGAC 3821delT synt F T(15)ATTCCTTCTCAATAAGTCCTGGCCAG 3821delT synt R T(15)GAATGTTCTCTAATATGGCATTTCCA Q1238X synt F T(15)TAGAGGGTGAGATTTGAACACTGCTT Q1238X synt R T(15)AGCCAGGACTTATTGAGAAGGAAATG S1255X (ex19)synt F T(15)GTCTGGCCCTCAGGGGGCCAAATGAC S1255X (ex19) synt R T(15)CGTCATCTTTCTTCACGTGTGAATTC S1255X;L synt F T(15)AAGCTTTTTTGAGACTACTGAACACT S1255X;L synt R T(15)TATAACAAAGTAATCTTCCCTGATCC 3849 ϩ 4AϾG synt F T(15)GGATTTGAACACTGCTTGCTTTGTTA 3849 ϩ 4AϾG synt R T(15)CCACCCTCTGGCCAGGACTTATTGAG 3850 - 1GϾA synt F T(15)AGTGGGCCTCTTGGGAAGAACTGGAT 3850 - 1GϾA synt R T(15)TTATAAGGTAAAAGTGATGGGATCAC 3905insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTGAGACTACTGAACACTGAA 3905insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAAGCTGATAACAAAGTACTCT 3876delA synt F T(15)CGGGAAGAGTACTTTGTTATCAGCTT 3876delA synt R T(15)CGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAAGAGGCCCA G1244V synt F T(15)TAAGAACTGGATCAGGGAAGAGTACT G1244V synt R T(15)ACCAAGAGGCCCACCTATAAGGTAAA G1249E synt F T(15)AGAAGAGTACTTTGTTATCAGCTTTT G1249E synt R T(15)TCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAAGAGGCC S1251N synt F T(15)ATACTTTGTTATCAGCTTTTTTGAGACTACTG S1251N synt R T(15)TTCTTCCCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCCAA S1252P synt F T(15)CCTTTGTTATCAGCTTTTTTGAGACT S1252P synt R T(15)GACTCTTCCCTGATCCAGTTCTTCCC D1270N synt F T(15)AATGGTGTGTCTTGGGATTCAATAAC D1270N synt R T(15)TGATCTGGATTTCTCCTTCAGTGTTC W1282R synt F T(15)CGGAGGAAAGCCTTTGGAGTGATACC W1282R synt R T(15)GCTGTTGCAAAGTTATTGAATCCCAA R1283K synt F T(15)AGAAAGCCTTTGGAGTGATACCACAG R1283K synt R T(15)TTCCACTGTTGCAAAGTTATTGAATC 4005 ϩ 1GϾA synt F T(15)ATGAGCAAAAGGACTTAGCCAGAAAA 4005 ϩ 1GϾA synt R T(15)TCTGTGGTATCACTCCAAAGGCTTTC 4010del4 synt F T(15)GTATTTTTTCTGGAACATTTAGAAAAAACTTGG 4010del4 synt R T(15)AAAATACTTTCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAA 4016insT synt F T(15)TTTTTTTCTGGAACATTTAGAAAAAACTTGG 4016insT synt R T(15)AAAAAAATAAATACTTTCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGA CFTRdele21 synt F T(15)TAGGTAAGGCTGCTAACTGAAATGAT CFTRdele21 synt R T(15)CCTATAGCAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAAGAAAGTATG 4382delA synt F T(15)GAGAGAACAAAGTGCGGCAGTACGAT 4382delA synt R T(15)CTCTATGACCTATGGAAATGGCTGTT Bold, mutation allele of interest; bold and italicized, modified nucleotide. Login to comment

[hide] Diagnostic testing by CFTR gene mutation analysis ... J Mol Diagn. 2005 May;7(2):289-99. Schrijver I, Ramalingam S, Sankaran R, Swanson S, Dunlop CL, Keiles S, Moss RB, Oehlert J, Gardner P, Wassman ER, Kammesheidt A
Diagnostic testing by CFTR gene mutation analysis in a large group of Hispanics: novel mutations and assessment of a population-specific mutation spectrum.
J Mol Diagn. 2005 May;7(2):289-99., [PMID:15858154]

Abstract [show]
Characterization of CFTR mutations in the U.S. Hispanic population is vital to early diagnosis, genetic counseling, patient-specific treatment, and the understanding of cystic fibrosis (CF) pathogenesis. The mutation spectrum in Hispanics, however, remains poorly defined. A group of 257 self-identified Hispanics with clinical manifestations consistent with CF were studied by temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis and/or DNA sequencing. A total of 183 mutations were identified, including 14 different amino acid-changing novel variants. A significant proportion (78/85) of the different mutations identified would not have been detected by the ACMG/ACOG-recommended 25-mutation screening panel. Over one third of the mutations (27/85) occurred with a relative frequency >1%, which illustrates that the identified mutations are not all rare. This is supported by a comparison with other large CFTR studies. These results underscore the disparity in mutation identification between Caucasians and Hispanics and show utility for comprehensive diagnostic CFTR mutation analysis in this population.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
98 Spectrum of CFTR Sequence Variants in 257 Hispanic Patients Who Underwent Diagnostic DNA Testing for CF Mutations in 257 patients Allele counts of each mutation % of variant alleles (183) % of all alleles tested (514) ACMG/ACOG recommended 25 mutation panel* DeltaF508 53 28.96 10.31 G542X 7 3.83 1.36 R334W 2 1.09 0.39 R553X 2 1.09 0.39 DeltaI507 1 0.55 0.19 1717 - 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 3120 ϩ 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 7 different mutations 67 36.61 13.04 All mutations included ACMG/ACOG 1248 ϩ 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 1249 - 29delAT 1 0.55 0.19 1288insTA1288insTA 1 0.55 0.19 1341 ϩ 80 GϾA1341 ϩ 80 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 1429del71429del7 1 0.55 0.19 1525 - 42 GϾA1525 - 42 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 1717 - 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 1717 - 8 GϾA 2 1.09 0.39 1811 ϩ 1 GϾA1811 ϩ 1 GϾA 1 0.55 0.19 2055del9-ϾA 3 1.64 0.58 2105-2117del13insAGAAA 1 0.55 0.19 2215insG 1 0.55 0.19 2585delT2585delT 1 0.55 0.19 2752 - 6 TϾC 1 0.55 0.19 296 ϩ 28 AϾG 1 0.55 0.19 3120 ϩ 1 GϾ A 1 0.55 0.19 3271 ϩ 8 AϾG3271 ϩ 8 AϾG 1 0.55 0.19 3271delGG 1 0.55 0.19 3272 - 26 AϾG 2 1.09 0.39 3876delA 2 1.09 0.39 4016insT 1 0.55 0.19 406 - 1 GϾA 6 3.28 1.17 406 - 6 TϾC 1 0.55 0.19 4374 ϩ 13 A ϾG 1 0.55 0.19 663delT 1 0.55 0.19 874insTACA874insTACA 1 0.55 0.19 A1009T 2 1.09 0.39 A559T 1 0.55 0.19 D1152H 1 0.55 0.19 D1270N 3 1.64 0.58 D1445N 2 1.09 0.39 D836Y 1 0.55 0.19 DeltaF311 1 0.55 0.19 DeltaF508 53 28.96 10.31 DeltaI507 1 0.55 0.19 E116K 2 1.09 0.39 E585X 1 0.55 0.19 E588VE588V 2 1.09 0.39 E831X 1 0.55 0.19 F311L 1 0.55 0.19 F693L 1 0.55 0.19 G1244E 1 0.55 0.19 G542X 7 3.83 1.36 G576A 1 0.55 0.19 H199Y 3 1.64 0.58 I1027T 3 1.64 0.58 I285FI285F 1 0.55 0.19 L206W 3 1.64 0.58 L320V 1 0.55 0.19 L967S 1 0.55 0.19 L997F 3 1.64 0.58 P1372LP1372L 1 0.55 0.19 P205S 1 0.55 0.19 P439SP439S 1 0.55 0.19 Q1313X 1 0.55 0.19 Q890X 2 1.09 0.39 Q98R 1 0.55 0.19 R1066C 1 0.55 0.19 R1066H 1 0.55 0.19 (Table continues) missense variant, I1027T (3212TϾC), in exon 17a.25 Family studies have not been performed to identify which allele carries two mutations. Login to comment
187 CFTR Sequence Variants Identified in Five Comprehensive CFTR Studies in US Hispanics CFTR mutations Alleles Relative mutation frequency (%) (of 317) deltaF508 123 38.80 3876delA 15 4.70 G542X 12 3.80 406 - 1GϾA 8 2.50 3849 ϩ 10kbCϾT 5 1.60 R75X 4 1.30 935delA 4 1.30 S549N 4 1.30 W1204X 4 1.30 R334W 4 1.30 2055del9ϾA 3 1 R74W 3 1 H199Y 3 1 L206W 3 1 663delT 3 1 3120 ϩ 1GϾA 3 1 L997F 3 1 I1027T 3 1 R1066C 3 1 W1089X 3 1 D1270N 3 1 2105del13insAGAAA 3 1 Q98R 2 Ͻ1 E116K 2 Ͻ1 I148T 2 Ͻ1 R668C 2 Ͻ1 P205S 2 Ͻ1 V232D 2 Ͻ1 S492F 2 Ͻ1 T501A 2 Ͻ1 1949del84 2 Ͻ1 Q890X 2 Ͻ1 3271delGG 2 Ͻ1 3272 - 26AϾG 2 Ͻ1 G1244E 2 Ͻ1 D1445N 2 Ͻ1 R553X 2 Ͻ1 E588V 2 Ͻ1 1717 - 8GϾA 2 Ͻ1 A1009T 2 Ͻ1 S1235R 2 Ͻ1 G85E 1 Ͻ1 296 ϩ 28AϾG 1 Ͻ1 406 - 6TϾC 1 Ͻ1 V11I 1 Ͻ1 Q179K 1 Ͻ1 V201 mol/L 1 Ͻ1 874insTACA 1 Ͻ1 I285F 1 Ͻ1 deltaF311 1 Ͻ1 F311L 1 Ͻ1 L320V 1 Ͻ1 T351S 1 Ͻ1 R352W 1 Ͻ1 1248 ϩ 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1249 - 29delAT 1 Ͻ1 1288insTA 1 Ͻ1 1341 ϩ 80GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1429del7 1 Ͻ1 1525 - 42GϾA 1 Ͻ1 P439S 1 Ͻ1 1717 - 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 1811 ϩ 1GϾA 1 Ͻ1 deltaI507 1 Ͻ1 G551D 1 Ͻ1 A559T 1 Ͻ1 Y563N 1 Ͻ1 (Table continues) In this study, we used temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE) and direct DNA sequencing to increase the sensitivity of mutation detection in U.S. Hispanics, and to determine whether additional mutations are recurrent. Login to comment
201 Comparison of Relative Frequencies of CFTR Sequence Variants in Comprehensive CFTR Studies in US and Mexican Hispanics This study % Orozco 2000 % US/ Mexican % deltaF508 28.96 54.48 43.72 G542X 3.83 8.28 5.19 406 - 1GϾA 3.28 2.07 2.38 W1204X 2.19 Ͻ1 1.08 R74W 1.64 Ͻ1 R75X 1.64 2.07 1.51 H199Y 1.64 Ͻ1 Ͻ1 L206W 1.64 Ͻ1 L997F 1.64 Ͻ1 I1027T 1.64 Ͻ1 2055del9ϾA 1.64 1.38 1.27 D1270N 1.64 Ͻ1 E116K 1.09 Ͻ1 V232D 1.09 Ͻ1 R334W 1.09 Ͻ1 S492F 1.09 Ͻ1 T501A 1.09 Ͻ1 R553X 1.09 Ͻ1 Ͻ1 E588V 1.09 Ͻ1 R668C 1.09 Ͻ1 Q890X 1.09 Ͻ1 W1089X 1.09 Ͻ1 S1235R 1.09 Ͻ1 D1445N 1.09 Ͻ1 3876delA 1.09 3.24 1717 - 8GϾA 1.09 Ͻ1 3272 - 26AϾG 1.09 Ͻ1 A1009T 1.09 Ͻ1 deltaI507 Ͻ1 3.45 1.30 S549N Ͻ1 3.45 1.95 G567A Ͻ1 Ͻ1 I148T 2.07 1.08 I506T 1.38 Ͻ1 N1303K 2.76 1.08 935delA 1.38 1.30 2183AAϾG 1.38 Ͻ1 3199del6 1.38 Ͻ1 3849 ϩ 10kbCϾT Ͻ1 1.30 ACMG/ACOG italicized. Login to comment

[hide] Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and ... Hum Mutat. 2000;16(2):143-56. Claustres M, Guittard C, Bozon D, Chevalier F, Verlingue C, Ferec C, Girodon E, Cazeneuve C, Bienvenu T, Lalau G, Dumur V, Feldmann D, Bieth E, Blayau M, Clavel C, Creveaux I, Malinge MC, Monnier N, Malzac P, Mittre H, Chomel JC, Bonnefont JP, Iron A, Chery M, Georges MD
Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and in congenital absence of the vas deferens in France.
Hum Mutat. 2000;16(2):143-56., [PMID:10923036]

Abstract [show]
We have collated the results of cystic fibrosis (CF) mutation analysis conducted in 19 laboratories in France. We have analyzed 7, 420 CF alleles, demonstrating a total of 310 different mutations including 24 not reported previously, accounting for 93.56% of CF genes. The most common were F508del (67.18%; range 61-80), G542X (2.86%; range 1-6.7%), N1303K (2.10%; range 0.75-4.6%), and 1717-1G>A (1.31%; range 0-2.8%). Only 11 mutations had relative frequencies >0. 4%, 140 mutations were found on a small number of CF alleles (from 29 to two), and 154 were unique. These data show a clear geographical and/or ethnic variation in the distribution of the most common CF mutations. This spectrum of CF mutations, the largest ever reported in one country, has generated 481 different genotypes. We also investigated a cohort of 800 French men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and identified a total of 137 different CFTR mutations. Screening for the most common CF defects in addition to assessment for IVS8-5T allowed us to detect two mutations in 47.63% and one in 24.63% of CBAVD patients. In a subset of 327 CBAVD men who were more extensively investigated through the scanning of coding/flanking sequences, 516 of 654 (78. 90%) alleles were identified, with 15.90% and 70.95% of patients carrying one or two mutations, respectively, and only 13.15% without any detectable CFTR abnormality. The distribution of genotypes, classified according to the expected effect of their mutations on CFTR protein, clearly differed between both populations. CF patients had two severe mutations (87.77%) or one severe and one mild/variable mutation (11.33%), whereas CBAVD men had either a severe and a mild/variable (87.89%) or two mild/variable (11.57%) mutations.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
108 g D44G, 300delA, W57X, 405+1G>A, D110H, E116K, 541del4, 542del7, L137R, 621+2T>G, I175V, H199R, H199Y, C225X, V232D, Q290X, E292X, G314V, T338I, 1221delCT, W401X, Q452P, I502T, 1716+2T>C, G544S, R560S, A561E, V562I, Y569D, 1898+3A>G, 1898+5G>A, G628R(G>A), 2143delT, G673X, R851X, Q890X, S977F, 3129del4, 3154delG, 3271+1G>A, G1061R, R1066L, R1070W, 3601-17T>C, S1196X, 3732delA, G1249R, 3898insC, 4374+1G>A, del25kb. Login to comment

[hide] Spectrum of CFTR mutations in the Middle North of ... Hum Mutat. 1999;14(1):89. Telleria JJ, Alonso MJ, Calvo C, Alonso M, Blanco A
Spectrum of CFTR mutations in the Middle North of Spain and identification of a novel mutation (1341G-->A). Mutation in brief no. 252. Online.
Hum Mutat. 1999;14(1):89., [PMID:10447267]

Abstract [show]
We have analyzed 39 unrelated cystic fibrosis (CF) families by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and direct sequencing in order to determine the spectrum of CF mutations in our population. This approach has allowed us to detect 72 out of the 78 CF chromosomes (92.3%). The DF508 mutation was found to be present in 51/78 (65.4%) CF chromosomes, in accordance with the predicted Northwest-Southeast gradient within the European population. Another 14 known mutations, and the novel 1341G-->A mutation were identified. Nine out of fifteen non DF508 mutations were present in a single chromosome. The 1341G-->A mutation, found in 2 unrelated patients, is a new mutation associated to severe phenotype, causing pancreatic insufficiency and chronic lung infections. Our data suggest a different distribution of non-DF508 mutations in our population when compared with previous studies carried out in Spanish CF families. Six out of the 14 non-F508 in our study were not present in a recent study carried out in 640 Spanish families with CE These six mutations account for 29.6% non DF508 chromosomes in our sample.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
33 Spectrum of CFTR Mutations Table 1 Spectrum of CFTR mutations identified in the present study compared with data published by Casals et al. (Casals et al. 1997) This study Casals et al. Mutation Exon/Intron n % n % ∆F508 E 10 51 65.4 681 53.2 711+1G→T I 5 3 3.8 22 1.7 G542X E 11 3 3.8 108 8.43 1213delT E 7 2 2.6 0 0 1341G→A E 8 2 2.6 0 0 R1066C E 17b 2 2.6 14 1.09 1717-1G→A I 10 1 1.3 1 0.08 S549R E 11 1 1.3 0 0 V562I E 12 1 1.3 0 0 G576A E 12 1 1.3 0 0 2183AA→G E13 1 1.3 5 0.39 2789+5G→A I 14b 1 1.3 11 0.86 Q890X E 15 1 1.3 13 1.01 3849+1G→A I 19 1 1.3 0 0 N1303K E 21 1 1.3 34 2.65 Other 0 0 391 30.5 Known mutations 72 92.3 1155 90.23 Unknown mutations 6 7.7 125 9.7 DISCUSSION The knowledge of the spectrum of mutations causing CF in any specific geographic region provide useful information to design the best approach in pre and postnatal diagnosis of CF; for the screening of mutations in the population at risk; to stimate the genetic risk etc. Moreover, the response to different therapeutic approaches could vary depending on the CF mutations in any case. Login to comment

[hide] Is meconium ileus genetically determined or associ... J Med Genet. 1998 Mar;35(3):262-3. De Braekeleer M, Allard C, Leblanc JP, Aubin G, Simard F
Is meconium ileus genetically determined or associated with a more severe evolution of cystic fibrosis?
J Med Genet. 1998 Mar;35(3):262-3., [PMID:9541118]

Abstract [show]

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
16 Although the A455E mutation is Table 1 Distribution of meconium ileus among CFTR genotypes in Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean No of CF Proportion No of CFpatients Proportion Proportion ofMI Genotypes patients (%) with meconium ileus (%) among genotypes AF508/AF508 52 39.4 5 26.3 9.6 AF508/621+G-*T 34 25.8 9 47.4 26.5 AF508/A455E 14 10.6 0 0.0 0.0 621+1G-*T/A455E 8 6.1 0 0.0 0.0 621+1G-*T/G85E 2 1.5 1 5.3 50.0 621+1G-*T/Y1092X 1 0.8 0 0.0 0.0 AF508/Y1092X 4 3.0 1 5.3 25.0 A455E/R117C 1 0.8 0 0.0 0.0 AF508/I148T 2 1.5 0 0.0 0.0 621+1G-*T/ 4 3.0 0 0.0 0.0 711 +1G-*T 621+1G-4T/S489X 1 0.8 0 0.0 0.0 AF508/Q890X 1 0.8 1 5.3 100.0 621+1G->T/ 6 4.5 2 10.5 33.3 621+1G-sT AF508/unknown 1 0.8 1 5.3 100.0 Unknown/unknown 1 0.8 0 0.0 0.0 Table 2 Main clinicalfindings in patients with meconium ileus With MI Without MI p value No of patients 18 18 Sex (M/IF) 6/12 6/12 No of patients alive 16 17 Mean age (SD) 16.75 (9.7) 16.70 (7.9) p=0.99 Mean birth weight (SD) 3.24 (0.40) 3.02 (0.47) p=O.18 Mean birth height (SD) 50.0 (2.27) 50.0 (2.58) p=0.86 Currentweightcentile (SD) 26.7 (24.5) 14.1 (18.0) p=0.06 Current height centile (SD) 29.9 (25.1) 20.6 (25.6) p=0.33 Sweat chloride concentration (mEq/l) 105.9 (6.5) 101.1 (9.8) p=O.12 Mean FVC (SD) 89.7 (24.4) 93.0 (17.0) p=0.75 Mean FEV (SD) 73.1 (23.9) 75.4 (18.7) p=0.81 Mean Shwachman score (SD) 82.8 (11.8) 79.2 (12.6) p=0.36 Colonisation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa 13 14 p=0.70 Staphyloccoccus aureus 16 17 p=0.55 Haemophilus influenzae 13 14 p=0.70 Pseudomonas maltophilia 4 6 p=0.46 Pseudomonas cepacia 0 1 Pancreatic insufficiency 18 18 DIOS 7 1 p=0.016 Rectal prolapse 1 2 p=0.55 Recurrent abdominal pain 6 1 p=0.035 Diabetes mellitus 5 0 p=0.016 Liver complications 3* 0 p=0.07 Nasal polyposis 6 6 p=1.00 DIOS=distal intestinal obstruction syndrome. Login to comment

[hide] Complete identification of cystic fibrosis transme... Clin Genet. 1998 Jan;53(1):44-6. De Braekeleer M, Mari C, Verlingue C, Allard C, Leblanc JP, Simard F, Aubin G, Ferec C
Complete identification of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mutations in the CF population of Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean (Quebec, Canada).
Clin Genet. 1998 Jan;53(1):44-6., [PMID:9550360]

Abstract [show]
Over the past few years, we have conducted a systematic study of 230 cystic fibrosis (CF) chromosomes in the Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean (SLSJ) population which has a high CF incidence (1/936 live births). We identified 11 mutations accounting for 100% of the CF chromosomes found in patients born in SLSJ. Our results indicate that denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) is a powerful method of identifying CF mutations. They have also considerable implications for genetic counselling and molecular characterization of doubtful patients. They make carrier screening technically feasible in this population.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
33 Distributon of CFTR mutations in CF patients born in SLSJ Mutations No. CF chromosomes Proportion(%) AF508 120 621tlG-T 51 A455E 17 Y1092X 3 1148T 2 711+1G+T 2 G85E 1 Q890X 1 s489x 1 R117C 1 R1158X 1 60 25.5 8.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Table 1 gives the distribution of the mutations found on the C F chromosomes from patients born in the SLSJ region. Login to comment
43 Distributionof CFtR genotypes in CF patients born in SLSJ Genotypes No. CF patients AFS08/AF508 AF5@/621+lG-T AF508/A455E 621t 1G+T/A455E 621t 1G+T/621 t 1G-T AF508,N109W AF508/1148T 621t1G+T/711 t1G+T 621t 1G+T/G85E 621t1G+T/YlO92X A455E/R117C 621+1G+TjS489X AF508/Q890X AF508/R1158X 37 30 6 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 45 De Braekeleer et al. identify 100% of the CFTR mutations in the CF population born in SLSJ. Login to comment

[hide] High heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis in Spanish ... Hum Genet. 1997 Dec;101(3):365-70. Casals T, Ramos MD, Gimenez J, Larriba S, Nunes V, Estivill X
High heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis in Spanish families: 75 mutations account for 90% of chromosomes.
Hum Genet. 1997 Dec;101(3):365-70., [PMID:9439669]

Abstract [show]
We have analyzed 640 Spanish cystic fibrosis (CF) families for mutations in the CFTR gene by direct mutation analysis, microsatellite haplotypes, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, single-strand conformation analysis and direct sequencing. Seventy-five mutations account for 90.2% of CF chromosomes. Among these we have detected seven novel CFTR mutations, including four missense (G85V, T582R, R851L and F1074L), two nonsense (E692X and Q1281X) and one splice site mutation (711+3A-->T). Three variants, two in intronic regions (406-112A/T and 3850-129T/C) and one in the coding region (741C/T) were also identified. Mutations G85V, T582R, R851L, E692X and Q1281X are severe, with lung and pancreatic involvement; 711+3A-->T could be responsible for a pancreatic sufficiency/insufficiency variable phenotype; and F1074L was associated with a mild phenotype. These data demonstrate the highest molecular heterogeneity reported so far in CF, indicating that a wide mutation screening is necessary to characterize 90% of the Spanish CF alleles.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
31 Only ten mutations have a frequency of 1% and above: ∆F508 (53.2%), G542X (8.4%), N1303K (2.6%), 1811+1.6kbA→G (1.8%), 711+1G→T (1.7%), R1162X and R334W (1.6%), R1066C, 1609delCA and Q890X (1.0%). Login to comment
33 Eight mutations have frequencies 366 Table 1 Seventy-five CFTR mutations identified in 640 Spanish families with cystic fibrosis (CF) Mutation Exon/intron CF alleles % ∆F508 E.10 681 53.20 G542X E.11 108 8.43 N1303K E.21 34 2.65 1811+1.6kbA→Ga I.11 24 1.87 711+1G→T I.5 22 1.71 R1162Xa E.19 21 1.64 R334Wa E.7 21 1.64 R1066C E.17b 14 1.09 1609delCAa E.10 13 1.01 Q890X E.15 13 1.01 G85E E.3 12 0.94 712-1G→Ta I.5 11 0.86 2789+5G→A I.14b 11 0.86 ∆I507 E.10 10 0.78 W1282X E.20 10 0.78 2869insGa E.15 9 0.70 L206W E.6a 7 0.54 R709X E.13 7 0.54 621+1G→T I.4 6 0.47 3272-26A→G I.17a 6 0.47 R347H E.7 5 0.39 2183AA→G E.13 5 0.39 K710X E.13 5 0.39 2176insC E.13 5 0.39 3849+10kbC→T I.19 5 0.39 P205Sa E.6a 4 0.31 1078delT E.7 4 0.31 R553X E.11 4 0.31 G551D E.11 4 0.31 1812-1G→Aa I.11 4 0.31 CFdel#1a E.4-7/11-18 4 0.31 V232D E.6a 3 0.23 936delTAa E.6b 3 0.23 1717-8G→A I.10 3 0.23 1949del84 E.13 3 0.23 W1089X E.17b 3 0.23 R347P E.7 3 0.23 del E.3a E.3 2 0.16 R117H E.4 2 0.16 L558S E.11 2 0.16 A561E E.12 2 0.16 2603delT E.13 2 0.16 Y1092X E.17b 2 0.16 Q1100Pa E.17b 2 0.16 M1101K E.17b 2 0.16 delE.19a E.19 2 0.16 G1244E E.20 2 0.16 P5La E.1 1 0.08 Q30Xa E.2 1 0.08 G85Va E.3 1 0.08 E92Ka E.4 1 0.08 A120Ta E.4 1 0.08 I148T E.4 1 0.08 711+3A→Ta I.5 1 0.08 H199Y E.6a 1 0.08 875+1G→A I.6a 1 0.08 Table 1 (continued) Mutation Exon/intron CF alleles % 1717-1G→A I.10 1 0.08 L571S E.12 1 0.08 T582Ra E.12 1 0.08 E585X E.12 1 0.08 1898+3A→G I.12 1 0.08 G673X E.13 1 0.08 E692Xa E.13 1 0.08 R851X E.14a 1 0.08 R851La E.14a 1 0.08 A1006E E.17a 1 0.08 L1065Ra E.17b 1 0.08 F1074La E.17b 1 0.08 R1158X E.19 1 0.08 3667del4a E.19 1 0.08 3860ins31a E.20 1 0.08 3905insT E.20 1 0.08 4005+1G→A I.20 1 0.08 Q1281Xa E.20 1 0.08 Q1313X E.21 1 0.08 Known mutations (75) 1155 90.23 Unknown mutations 125 9.77 a Mutations discovered by the CF group of the Medical and Molecular Genetics Centre - IRO, Barcelona, Spain that range between 0.5% and 0.9%, representing 6.0% of the CF chromosomes. Login to comment

[hide] Increased incidence of cystic fibrosis gene mutati... Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Apr;4(4):635-9. Pignatti PF, Bombieri C, Marigo C, Benetazzo M, Luisetti M
Increased incidence of cystic fibrosis gene mutations in adults with disseminated bronchiectasis.
Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Apr;4(4):635-9., [PMID:7543317]

Abstract [show]
In order to identify a possible hereditary predisposition to the development of obstructive pulmonary disease of unknown origin, we have looked for the presence of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator (CFTR) gene mutations in unrelated patients with no signs of Cystic Fibrosis (CF). We screened for 70 common mutations, and also for rare mutations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. In this search, different CFTR gene mutations (R75Q, delta F508, R1066C, M1137V and 3667ins4) were found in five out of 16 adult Italian patients with disseminated bronchiectasis, a significant increase over the expected frequency of carriers. Moreover, three rare CFTR gene DNA polymorphisms (G576A, R668C, and 2736 A-->G), not deemed to be the cause of CF, were found in two patients, one of which was a compound heterozygote with R1066C. These results indicate that CFTR gene mutations, and perhaps also DNA polymorphisms, may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of at least some cases of bronchiectasis.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
31 List of CFTR gene mutations and DNA polymorphisms screened Mutations R75Q/X/L, G85E, 394deITT 457TAT->G, R117H 621 + 1G->T 711 + 5G->A L206W 875 + 40 A->G 936 del TA 1001 + 11C->T R334W, R347 P/H/L, 1154insTC A455E, V456F DF5O8 1717-IG->A, 1717-8G->A G542X, G551D, Q552X, R553X P574H 1898 + 3A->G 2183 AA->G, 2184delA, R709X D836Y, 2694 T/G 2752-22 A/G 2789 + 5 G->A, 2790-2 A-»G Q890X 3041-71 G/C 3132delTG 3271 + 18 C-»T, 3272-26 A->G H1054D, G1061R, R1066C/H, A1067T, H1085R, Y1092X, 3320 ins5 D1152H R1162X, 3667ins4, 3737delA, 11234V 3849 + 10 kb C-»T, 3850-1 G-»A SI25IN, S1255P, 3905insT, 3898insC, D127ON, W1282X, R1283M, 4002 A/G 4005 + 1 G-»A N1303 K/H, 4029 A/G D1377H Q1411 X 4404 C/T, 4521 G/A Location e 3 e 4 i 4 i 5 e 6a i 6a e 6b i 6b e 7 e 9 e 10 i 10 e 11 e 12 i 12 e 13 e 14a i 14a i 14b e 15 i 15 e 17a i 17a e 17b e 18 e 19 i 19 e 20 i 20 e2l e 22 e 23 e24 Listing is in order of location along the CFTR gene, e = exon; i = intron. Login to comment

[hide] Mutation analysis in 600 French cystic fibrosis pa... J Med Genet. 1994 Jul;31(7):541-4. Chevalier-Porst F, Bonardot AM, Gilly R, Chazalette JP, Mathieu M, Bozon D
Mutation analysis in 600 French cystic fibrosis patients.
J Med Genet. 1994 Jul;31(7):541-4., [PMID:7525963]

Abstract [show]
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene of 600 unrelated cystic fibrosis (CF) patients living in France (excluding Brittany) was screened for 105 different mutations. This analysis resulted in the identification of 86% of the CF alleles and complete genotyping of 76% of the patients. The most frequent mutations in this population after delta F508 (69% of the CF chromosomes) are G542X (3.3%), N1303K (1.8%), W1282X (1.5%), 1717-1G-->A (1.3%), 2184delA + 2183 A-->G (0.9%), and R553X (0.8%).

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
21 Among the 104 other CFTR mutations tested on the 373 non-AF508 CF chromosomes, none of the following 58 mutations were found: G91R, 435 insA, 444delA, D11OH, 556delA, 557delT, R297Q, 1154insTC, R347L, R352Q, Q359K/T360K, 1221delCT, G480C, Q493R, V520F, C524X, 1706dell7, S549R (A-C), S549N, S549I, G551S, 1784delG, Q552X, L558S, A559T, R560T, R560K, Y563N, P574H, 2307insA, 2522insC, 2556insAT, E827X, Q890X, Y913C, 2991de132 (Dork et al, personal communication), L967S, 3320ins5, 3359delCT, H1085R, R1158X, 3662delA, 3667del4, 3667ins4, 3732delA, 3737delA, W1204X, 3750delAG, I 1234V, Q1238X, 3850- 3T-+G, 3860ins31, S1255X, 3898insC, D1270N, R1283M, F1286S, 4005 + I G-A. Forty-six other mutations were found on at Distribution of CFTR mutations found in our sample ofpopulation (1200 CF chromosomes) Mutations tested No of CF chromosomes Haplotypes Method with the mutation XV2C-KM19 (% of total CF alleles) Exon 3: G85E 4 (033) 3C HinfI/ASO394delTT 2 2B PAGEExon 4: R117H 1 B ASOY122X 2 2C MseI/sequenceI148T 1 B ASO621+IG-J* 1 B MseIIASOExon 5: 711+1G--T 8(07) 8A ASOExon 7: AF311 1 C PAGE/sequencelO78delT 5 (0-42) 5C PAGE/ASOR334W 5 (0-42) 2A,2C,ID MspIlASOR347P 5 (042) 5A CfoI/NcoIR347H 1 Cfol/sequenceExon 9: A455E 1 B ASOExon 10: S492F I C DdeI/sequenceQ493X 1 D ASOl609deICA 1 C PAGE/Ddel/sequenceA1507 3 (025) 3D PAGE/ASOAF508 827 (69) 794B,30D,2C,IA PAGEl677delTA 1 A PAGE/sequenceExon I11: 1717-IG--.A 16(1-3) 14B Modified primers + AvaIIG542X 40 (3-3) 29B,5D,2A Modified primers + BstNiS549R(T--*G) 2 2B ASOG551D 3 (025) 3B HincII/Sau3AR553X 10(0-8) 6A,1B,2C,ID Hincll/sequenceExon 12: 1898+IG--A 1 C ASO1898+ IG-C 2 IC ASOExon 13: l9l8deIGC 1 A PAGE/sequence1949de184 I C PAGE/sequenceG628R(G-+A) 2 2A Sequence2118de14 I c PAGE/sequence2143de1T 1 B PAGE/modified primers2184de1A+2183A--*G 11 (0-9) lIB PAGE/ASO2184de1A 1 ASOK710X 3 (025) IC XmnI2372de18 1 B PAGE/sequenceExon 15: S945L 1 C TaqlExon 17b:L1065P I MnlIL1077P 1 A ASOY1092X 3 (025) 2C,IA Rsal/ASOExon 19: RI1162X 6 (0-5) 5C,IA DdeI/ASO3659delC 3 (025) 3C ASOExon 20: G1244E 2 2A MboIIS1251N 2 2C RsaI3905insT 4 (0-33) 4C PAGE/ASOW1282X 18 (105) 15B,1D MnlI/ASOR1283K 1 C Mnll/sequenceExon 21: N1303K 22 (1-8) 18B,lA,ID Modified primers+BstNI 47 mutations 1031 (85 9) least one CF chromosome (table): 21 of them are very rare as they were found on only one CF chromosome in our population. Login to comment

[hide] Analysis of 31 CFTR mutations in 55 families from ... Early Hum Dev. 2001 Nov;65 Suppl:S161-4. Gomez-Llorente MA, Suarez A, Gomez-Llorente C, Munoz A, Arauzo M, Antunez A, Navarro M, Gil A, Gomez-Capilla JA
Analysis of 31 CFTR mutations in 55 families from the South of Spain.
Early Hum Dev. 2001 Nov;65 Suppl:S161-4., [PMID:11755047]

Abstract [show]
We carried out a molecular analysis of 350 chromosomes from 55 families originating from the South of Spain (Andalucia) who were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (CF). We used polymerase chain reaction, followed by an oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA) and sequence-coded separation using capillary electrophoresis. A frequency of 43.5% for DeltaF508 was found, making it the most common CF mutation in our sample. Seven more mutations (G542X, R334W, R1162X, 2789+5G-->A, R117H, DeltaI507 and W1282X) were detected and accounted for 24.7% of the total. The remaining mutations (31.8%) were undetectable with the methodology used in this study.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
62 G, R1066C, 1609delCA and Q890X) were not detected by Applied Biosystems analytical method and may account for the high number of uncharacterised CF alleles. Login to comment
64 G, R1066C, 1609delCA and Q890X mutations in our uncharacterised CF chromosomes. Login to comment

[hide] CFTR gene analysis in Latin American CF patients: ... J Cyst Fibros. 2007 May;6(3):194-208. Epub 2006 Sep 11. Perez MM, Luna MC, Pivetta OH, Keyeux G
CFTR gene analysis in Latin American CF patients: heterogeneous origin and distribution of mutations across the continent.
J Cyst Fibros. 2007 May;6(3):194-208. Epub 2006 Sep 11., [PMID:16963320]

Abstract [show]
BACKGROUND: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is the most prevalent Mendelian disorder in European populations. Despite the fact that many Latin American countries have a predominant population of European-descent, CF has remained an unknown entity until recently. Argentina and Brazil have detected the first patients around three decades ago, but in most countries this disease has remained poorly documented. Recently, other countries started publishing their results. METHODS: We present a compilation and statistical analysis of the data obtained in 10 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Mexico, Uruguay and Venezuela), with a total of 4354 unrelated CF chromosomes studied. RESULTS: The results show a wide distribution of 89 different mutations, with a maximum coverage of 62.8% of CF chromosomes/alleles in the patient's sample. Most of these mutations are frequent in Spain, Italy, and Portugal, consistent with the origin of the European settlers. A few African mutations are also present in those countries which were part of the slave trade. New mutations were also found, possibly originating in America. CONCLUSION: The profile of mutations in the CFTR gene, which reflects the heterogeneity of its inhabitants, shows the complexity of the molecular diagnosis of CF mutations in most of the Latin American countries.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
78 At least another 38 mutations have been searched for, but none of them were found in the CF patients from Latin America: p.E60X, p.Y122X, p.G178R, p.G330X, p.R347H, p.R352Q, p.S364P, p.A455E, p.Q493X, p.V520F, p.C524X, p.R560T, p.Y563D, p.P574H, p.K710X, p.Q890X, p. R1158X, p.S1196X, p.S1255X, p.D1270N, p.W1310X, p. W1316X, c.405+1G-A, c.444delA, c.556delA, c.574delA, c.1677delTA, c.2043delG, c.2307insA, c.2909delT, c.3120G-A, c.3358delAC, c.3662delA, c.3750delAG, c.3791delC, c.3821delT, c.3849+4A-G, c.3905insT. Login to comment

[hide] Quantification of major urinary metabolites of PGE... Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2013 Aug;89(2-3):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 20. Jabr S, Gartner S, Milne GL, Roca-Ferrer J, Casas J, Moreno A, Gelpi E, Picado C
Quantification of major urinary metabolites of PGE2 and PGD2 in cystic fibrosis: correlation with disease severity.
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2013 Aug;89(2-3):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 20., [PMID:23791427]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance (CFTR) alterations are involved in the overproduction of prostaglandins (PG) in CF in vitro. We assessed the relationship between PGE-M and PGD-M urinary metabolites of PGE2 and PGD2 and CF severity. Twenty-four controls and 35 CF patients were recruited. PGE-M and PGD-M levels were measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and results were expressed as median and 25th-75th interquartile of ng/mg creatinine (Cr). PGE-M (15.63; 9.07-43.35ng/mg Cr) and PGD-M (2.16; 1.43-3.53ng/mg Cr) concentrations were higher in CF than in controls: PGE-M, (6.63; 4.35-8.60ng/mg Cr); PGD-M (1.23; 0.96-1.54ng/mg Cr). There was no correlation between metabolite levels and spirometric values. Patients with pancreatic insufficiency (n=29) had higher PGE-M levels (19.09; 9.36-52.69ng/mg Cr) than those with conserved function (n=6) (9.61; 5.78-14.34ng/mg Cr). PGE-M levels were associated with genotype severity: mild (7.14; 5.76-8.76, n=8), moderate (16.67; 13.67-28.62ng/mg Cr, n=5) and severe (22.82; 10.67-84.13ng/mg Cr). Our study confirms the key role of CFTR in the regulation of the cyclooxygenase pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism found in in vitro studies.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
113 Mutations Mutation class Severity Number Pancreatic sufficiency (n) W128X/W128X I/I Severe 1 0 I507/Q890X I/I Severe 1 0 F508del/G542X II/I Severe 2 0 F508del/2188AA4G II/I Severe 1 0 F508del/N1303K II/I Severe 3 0 F508del/1677delTA II/I Severe 1 0 F508del/2188AA4G II/I Severe 1 0 F508del/F508del II/II Severe 10 0 F508del/Q890X II/II Severe 1 0 F508del/E1308X II/II Severe 1 0 F508del/5T-12TG II/III Moderate 2 0 G542X/G85V I/III Moderate 1 0 F508del/124del23kbp II/III Moderate 1 0 G542X/M1137V I/III Moderate 1 1 I507/L206W I/IV Mild 1 0 F508del/L206W I/IV Mild 4 2 711+1G4L206W I/IV Mild 1 1 N1303K/3272-26A4G I/IV Mild 1 1 F508del/F587I II/V Mild 1 1 n&#bc;Number. Login to comment

[hide] Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a North Ameri... Genet Med. 2014 Jul;16(7):539-46. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.188. Epub 2013 Dec 19. Zvereff VV, Faruki H, Edwards M, Friedman KJ
Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a North American population.
Genet Med. 2014 Jul;16(7):539-46. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.188. Epub 2013 Dec 19., [PMID:24357848]

Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the mutation frequency distribution for a 32-mutation panel and a 69-mutation panel used for cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Further aims of the study were to examine the race-specific detection rates provided by both panels and to assess the performance of extended panels in large-scale, population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Although genetic screening for the most common CFTR mutations allows detection of nearly 90% of cystic fibrosis carriers, the large number of other mutations, and their distribution within different ethnic groups, limits the utility of general population screening. METHODS: Patients referred for cystic fibrosis screening from January 2005 through December 2010 were tested using either a 32-mutation panel (n = 1,601,308 individuals) or a 69-mutation panel (n = 109,830). RESULTS: The carrier frequencies observed for the 69-mutation panel study population (1/36) and Caucasian (1/27) and African-American individuals (1/79) agree well with published cystic fibrosis carrier frequencies; however, a higher carrier frequency was observed for Hispanic-American individuals (1/48) using the 69-mutation panel as compared with the 32-mutation panel (1/69). The 69-mutation panel detected ~20% more mutations than the 32-mutation panel for both African-American and Hispanic-American individuals. CONCLUSION: Expanded panels using race-specific variants can improve cystic fibrosis carrier detection rates within specific populations. However, it is important that the pathogenicity and the relative frequency of these variants are confirmed.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
63 This threshold could not be reached Table 1ߒ CFTR allele frequency identified by the CF32 mutation panel Varianta Number of detected alleles Mutation (%) Legacy nomenclature HGVS nomenclature F508delb p.F508del 31,142 68.69 R117Hb p.R117H 5,198 11.46 G542Xb p.G542X 1,162 2.56 G551Db p.G551D 989 2.18 W1282Xb p.W1282X 824 1.82 3120ߙ+ߙ1G>Ab c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A 706 1.56 N1303Kb p.N1303K 648 1.43 R553Xb p.R553X 487 1.07 3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC>Tb c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T 436 0.96 621ߙ+ߙ1G>Tb c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T 410 0.90 1717-1G>Ab c.1585-1G>A 388 0.86 2789ߙ+ߙ5G>Ab c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A 382 0.84 I507delb p.I507del 258 0.57 R334Wb p.R334W 257 0.57 R1162Xb p.R1162X 211 0.47 G85Eb p.G85E 199 0.44 1898ߙ+ߙ1G>Ab c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A 170 0.37 R347Hc p.R347H 160 0.35 3659delCb c.3528delC 155 0.34 3876delAc c.3744delA 153 0.34 R560Tb p.R560T 132 0.29 S549Nc p.S549N 125 0.28 3905insTc c.3773dupT 121 0.27 R347Pb p.R347P 117 0.26 2184delAb c.2052delA 107 0.24 A455Eb p.A455E 106 0.23 711ߙ+ߙ1G>Tb c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T 65 0.14 394delTTc c.262_263delTT 56 0.12 V520Fc p.V520F 54 0.12 1078delTc c.948delT 52 0.11 2183AA>Ga,c c.2051_2052delAAinsG 37 0.08 S549Rc p.S549R 31 0.07 Total 45,338 100 a 2183AA>G variant was added to the panel in 2010. b Variants from ACMG/ACOG CF screening panel. c Classified as a CF-causing mutation by the CFTR2 Database. ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; CF, cystic fibrosis; HGVS, Human Genome Variation Society. Table 2ߒ Continued on next page Table 2ߒ CFTR allele frequency identified by the CF69 mutation panel Varianta Allele frequency Mutation (%) Legacy nomenclature HGVS nomenclature F508delb p.F508del 1,868 60.49 R117Hb p.R117H 274 8.87 D1152Hc p.D1152H 125 4.05 G542Xb p.G542X 98 3.17 L206Wd p.L206W 73 2.36 3120ߙ+ߙ1G>Ab c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A 65 2.10 G551Db p.G551D 47 1.52 N1303Kb p.N1303K 42 1.36 W1282Xb p.W1282X 38 1.23 3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC>Tb c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T 28 0.91 3876delAd c.3744delA 28 0.91 F311dele p.F312del 24 0.78 I507delb p.I507del 24 0.78 R553Xb p.R553X 24 0.78 R117Cd p.R117C 22 0.71 621ߙ+ߙ1G>Tb c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T 21 0.68 1717-1G>Ab c.1585-1G>A 18 0.58 S549Nd p.S549N 18 0.58 R334Wb p.R334W 17 0.55 2789ߙ+ߙ5G>Ab c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A 16 0.52 G85Eb p.G85E 14 0.45 3199del6e c.3067_3072delATAGTG 12 0.39 R1066Cd p.R1066C 11 0.36 1898ߙ+ߙ1G>Ab c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A 10 0.32 R347Hd p.R347H 10 0.32 R1162 Xb p.R1162X 9 0.29 W1089Xd p.W1089X 9 0.29 2184delAb c.2052delA 8 0.26 2307insAd c.2175dupA 8 0.26 1078delTd c.948delT 7 0.23 R75Xd p.R75X 7 0.23 3120G>Ad c.2988 G>A 6 0.19 3659delCb c.3528delC 6 0.19 Q493Xd p.Q493X 6 0.19 R1158Xd p.R1158X 6 0.19 R560Tb p.R560T 6 0.19 1812-1G>Ad c.1680-1G>A 5 0.16 2055del9>Ad c.1923_1931del9insA 5 0.16 406-1G>Ad c.274-1G>A 5 0.16 A559Td p.A559T 5 0.16 R347Pb p.R347P 5 0.16 S1255Xd p.S1255X 5 0.16 1677delTAd c.1545_1546delTA 4 0.13 711ߙ+ߙ1G>Tb c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T 4 0.13 E60Xd p.E60X 4 0.13 R352Qd p.R352Q 4 0.13 Y1092Xd p.Y1092X 4 0.13 2183AA>Gd c.2051_2052delAAinsG 3 0.10 3791delCd c.3659delC 3 0.10 3905insTd c.3773dupT 3 0.10 by 10 variants: the 2143delT, A455E, S549R, Y122X, and M1101K mutations, typically observed in Caucasians; 935delA, 2869insG, and Q890X in Hispanics; and 405+3A>C and G480C in the African-American population. Login to comment
80 The Table 3ߒ Frequency of 5T/7T/9T genotypes as a result of R117H reflex testing Poly-T alleles Number of detected alleles (%) CF32 panel CF69 panel 5T/5T 23 (0.44) 2 (0.73) 5T/7T 430 (8.27) 26 (9.49) 5T/9T 38 (0.73) 1 (0.37) 7T/7T 4,103 (78.93) 219 (79.92) 7T/9T 604 (11.61) 26 (9.49) 9T/9T 1 (0.02) 0 Total 5,198 (100) 274 (100) 394delTTd c.262_263delTT 3 0.10 G178Rd p.G178R 3 0.10 V520Fd p.V520F 3 0.10 2143delTd c.2012delT 2 0.06 935delAe c.803delA 2 0.06 A455Eb p.A455E 2 0.06 Q890Xd p.Q890X 2 0.06 S549Rd p.S549R 2 0.06 2869insGd c.2737insG 1 0.03 405ߙ+ߙ3A>Ce c.273ߙ+ߙ3A>C 1 0.03 G480Ce p.G480C 1 0.03 M1101Kd p.M1101K 1 0.03 Y122Xd p.Y122X 1 0.03 Total 3,088 100 a 1898ߙ+ߙ5G>Te , 444delA, G330X, S364Pe , K710X, and S1196X mutations were not detected in the target population. Login to comment

[hide] Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis us... Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209. Baker MW, Atkins AE, Cordovado SK, Hendrix M, Earley MC, Farrell PM
Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study.
Genet Med. 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.209., [PMID:25674778]

Abstract [show]
Purpose:Many regions have implemented newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) using a limited panel of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) mutations after immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) analysis. We sought to assess the feasibility of further improving the screening using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology.Methods:An NGS assay was used to detect 162 CFTR mutations/variants characterized by the CFTR2 project. We used 67 dried blood spots (DBSs) containing 48 distinct CFTR mutations to validate the assay. NGS assay was retrospectively performed on 165 CF screen-positive samples with one CFTR mutation.Results:The NGS assay was successfully performed using DNA isolated from DBSs, and it correctly detected all CFTR mutations in the validation. Among 165 screen-positive infants with one CFTR mutation, no additional disease-causing mutation was identified in 151 samples consistent with normal sweat tests. Five infants had a CF-causing mutation that was not included in this panel, and nine with two CF-causing mutations were identified.Conclusion:The NGS assay was 100% concordant with traditional methods. Retrospective analysis results indicate an IRT/NGS screening algorithm would enable high sensitivity, better specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). This study lays the foundation for prospective studies and for introducing NGS in NBS laboratories.Genet Med advance online publication 12 February 2015Genetics in Medicine (2015); doi:10.1038/gim.2014.209.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
15 Correspondence: Mei W. Baker (mwbaker@wisc.edu) Improving newborn screening for cystic fibrosis using next-generation sequencing technology: a technical feasibility study Mei W. Baker, MD1,2 , Anne E. Atkins, MPH2 , Suzanne K. Cordovado, PhD3 , Miyono Hendrix, MS3 , Marie C. Earley, PhD3 and Philip M. Farrell, MD, PhD1,4 Table 1ߒ CF-causing or varying consequences mutations in the MiSeqDx IUO Cystic Fibrosis System c.1521_1523delCTT (F508del) c.2875delG (3007delG) c.54-5940_273ߙ+ߙ10250del21kb (CFTRdele2,3) c.3909C>G (N1303K) c.3752G>A (S1251N) Mutations that cause CF when combined with another CF-causing mutation c.1624G>T (G542X) c.2988ߙ+ߙ1G>A (3120ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3964-78_4242ߙ+ߙ577del (CFTRdele22,23) c.613C>T (P205S) c.1021T>C (S341P) c.948delT (1078delT) c.2988G>A (3120G->A) c.328G>C (D110H) c.200C>T (P67L) c.1397C>A (S466X(C>A)) c.1022_1023insTC (1154insTC) c.2989-1G>A (3121-1G->A) c.3310G>T (E1104X) c.3937C>T (Q1313X) c.1397C>G (S466X(C>G)) c.1081delT (1213delT) c.3140-26A>G (3272-26A->G) c.1753G>T (E585X) c.658C>T (Q220X) c.1466C>A (S489X) c.1116ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1248ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3528delC (3659delC) c.178G>T (E60X) c.115C>T (Q39X) c.1475C>T (S492F) c.1127_1128insA (1259insA) c.3659delC (3791delC) c.2464G>T (E822X) c.1477C>T (Q493X) c.1646G>A (S549N) c.1209ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1341ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.3717ߙ+ߙ12191C>T (3849ߙ+ߙ10kbC->T) c.2491G>T (E831X) c.1573C>T (Q525X) c.1645A>C (S549R) c.1329_1330insAGAT (1461ins4) c.3744delA (3876delA) c.274G>A (E92K) c.1654C>T (Q552X) c.1647T>G (S549R) c.1393-1G>A (1525-1G->A) c.3773_3774insT (3905insT) c.274G>T (E92X) c.2668C>T (Q890X) c.2834C>T (S945L) c.1418delG (1548delG) c.262_263delTT (394delTT) c.3731G>A (G1244E) c.292C>T (Q98X) c.1013C>T (T338I) c.1545_1546delTA (1677delTA) c.3873ߙ+ߙ1G>A (4005ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.532G>A (G178R) c.3196C>T (R1066C) c.1558G>T (V520F) c.1585-1G>A (1717-1G->A) c.3884_3885insT (4016insT) c.988G>T (G330X) c.3197G>A (R1066H) c.3266G>A (W1089X) c.1585-8G>A (1717-8G->A) c.273ߙ+ߙ1G>A (405ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.1652G>A (G551D) c.3472C>T (R1158X) c.3611G>A (W1204X) c.1679ߙ+ߙ1.6kbA>G (1811ߙ+ߙ1.6kbA->G) c.274-1G>A (406-1G->A) c.254G>A (G85E) c.3484C>T (R1162X) c.3612G>A (W1204X) c.1680-1G>A (1812-1G->A) c.4077_4080delTGTTinsAA (4209TGTT->AA) c.2908G>C (G970R) c.349C>T (R117C) c.3846G>A (W1282X) c.1766ߙ+ߙ1G>A (1898ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.4251delA (4382delA) c.595C>T (H199Y) c.1000C>T (R334W) c.1202G>A (W401X) c.1766ߙ+ߙ3A>G (1898ߙ+ߙ 3A->G) c.325_327delTATinsG (457TAT->G) c.1007T>A (I336K) c.1040G>A (R347H) c.1203G>A (W401X) c.2012delT (2143delT) c.442delA (574delA) c.1519_1521delATC (I507del) c.1040G>C (R347P) c.2537G>A (W846X) c.2051_2052delAAinsG (2183AA->G) c.489ߙ+ߙ1G>T (621ߙ+ߙ 1G->T) c.2128A>T (K710X) c.1055G>A (R352Q) c.3276C>A (Y1092X (C>A)) c.2052delA (2184delA) c.531delT (663delT) c.3194T>C (L1065P) c.1657C>T (R553X) c.3276C>G (Y1092X (C>G)) c.2052_2053insA (2184insA) c.579ߙ+ߙ1G>T (711ߙ+ߙ 1G->T) c.3230T>C (L1077P) c.1679G>A (R560K) c.366T>A (Y122X) c.2175_2176insA (2307insA) c.579ߙ+ߙ3A>G (711ߙ+ߙ 3A->G) c.617T>G (L206W) c.1679G>C (R560T) - c.2215delG (2347delG) c.579ߙ+ߙ5G>A (711ߙ+ߙ 5G->A) c.1400T>C (L467P) c.2125C>T (R709X) - c.2453delT (2585delT) c.580-1G>T (712-1G->T) c.2195T>G (L732X) c.223C>T (R75X) - c.2490ߙ+ߙ1G>A (2622ߙ+ߙ1G->A) c.720_741delAGGGAG AATGATGATGAAGTAC (852del22) c.2780T>C (L927P) c.2290C>T (R764X) - c.2583delT (2711delT) c.1364C>A (A455E) c.3302T>A (M1101K) c.2551C>T (R851X) - c.2657ߙ+ߙ5G>A (2789ߙ+ߙ5G->A) c.1675G>A (A559T) c.1A>G (M1V) c.3587C>G (S1196X) - Mutations/variants that were validated in this study are in bold. CF, cystic fibrosis. Table 1ߒ Continued on next page reduce carrier detection and potentially improve the positive predictive value (PPV), the NBS goals of equity and the highest possible sensitivity become more difficult to achieve. Login to comment

[hide] The improvement of the best practice guidelines fo... Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99. Girardet A, Viart V, Plaza S, Daina G, De Rycke M, Des Georges M, Fiorentino F, Harton G, Ishmukhametova A, Navarro J, Raynal C, Renwick P, Saguet F, Schwarz M, SenGupta S, Tzetis M, Roux AF, Claustres M
The improvement of the best practice guidelines for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: toward an international consensus.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May 27. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.99., [PMID:26014425]

Abstract [show]
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorders, giving couples the opportunity to conceive unaffected children without having to consider termination of pregnancy. However, there are no available standardized protocols, so that each center has to develop its own diagnostic strategies and procedures. Furthermore, reproductive decisions are complicated by the diversity of disease-causing variants in the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene and the complexity of correlations between genotypes and associated phenotypes, so that attitudes and practices toward the risks for future offspring can vary greatly between countries. On behalf of the EuroGentest Network, eighteen experts in PGD and/or molecular diagnosis of CF from seven countries attended a workshop held in Montpellier, France, on 14 December 2011. Building on the best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD established by ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology), the goal of this meeting was to formulate specific guidelines for CF-PGD in order to contribute to a better harmonization of practices across Europe. Different topics were covered including variant nomenclature, inclusion criteria, genetic counseling, PGD strategy and reporting of results. The recommendations are summarized here, and updated information on the clinical significance of CFTR variants and associated phenotypes is presented.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 27 May 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.99.

Comments [show]

None has been submitted yet.

Sentences [show]
No. Sentence Comment
79 (unknown) Q39X c.115C4T p.Gln39* P67L c.200C4T p.Pro67Leu R75X c.223C4T p.Arg75* 405+1G4A c.273+1G4A 406-1G4A c.274-1G4A E92X c.274G4T p.Glu92* E92K c.274G4A p.Glu92Lys Q98X c.292C4T p.Gln98* 457TAT4G c.325_327delTATinsG p.Tyr109Glyfs*4 D110H c.328G4C p.Asp110His R117C c.349C4T p.Arg117Cys Y122X c.366 T4A p.Tyr122* 574delA c.442delA p.Ile148Leufs*5 444delA c.313delA p.Ile105Serfs*2 663delT c.531delT p.Ile177Metfs*12 G178R c.532G4A p.Gly178Arg 711+3 A4G c.579+3 A4G 711+5G4A c.579+5G4A 712-1G4T c.580-1G4T H199Y c.595C4T p.His199Tyr P205S c.613C4T p.Pro205Ser L206W c.617 T4G p.Leu206Trp Q220X c.658C4T p.Gln220* 852del22 c.720_741delAGGGAGAAT GATGATGAAGTAC p.Gly241Glufs*13 1078delT c.948delT p.Phe316Leufs*12 G330X c.988G4T p.Gly330* Table 1 (Continued ) HGVS nomenclature Legacy name cDNA nucleotide name Protein name R334W c.1000C4T p.Arg334Trp I336K c.1007 T4A p.Ile336Lys T338I c.1013C4T p.Thr338Ile 1154insTC c.1021_1022dupTC p.Phe342Hisfs*28 S341P c.1021 T4C p.Ser341Pro R347H c.1040G4A p.Arg347His 1213delT c.1081delT p.Trp361Glyfs*8 1248+1G4A c.1116+1G4A 1259insA c.1130dupA p.Gln378Alafs*4 W401X(TAG) c.1202G4A p.Trp401* W401X(TGA) c.1203G4A p.Trp401* 1341+1G4A c.1209+1G4A 1461ins4 c.1329_1330insAGAT p.Ile444Argfs*3 1525-1G4A c.1393-1G4A S466X c.1397C4A or c.1397C4G p.Ser466* L467P c.1400 T4C p.Leu467Pro S489X c.1466C4A p.Ser489* S492F c.1475C4T p.Ser492Phe 1677delTA c.1545_1546delTA p.Tyr515* V520F c.1558G4T p.Val520Phe 1717-1G4A c.1585-1G4A 1717-8G4A c.1585-8G4A S549R c.1645 A4C p.Ser549Arg S549N c.1646G4A p.Ser549Asn S549R c.1647 T4G p.Ser549Arg Q552X c.1654C4T p.Gln552* A559T c.1675G4A p.Ala559Thr 1811+1.6kbA4G c.1680-886 A4G 1812-1G4A c.1680-1G4A R560K c.1679G4A p.Arg560Lys E585X c.1753G4T p.Glu585* 1898+3 A4G c.1766+3 A4G 2143delT c.2012delT p.Leu671* 2184insA c.2052_2053insA p.Gln685Thrfs*4 2184delA c.2052delA p.Lys684Asnfs*38 R709X c.2125C4T p.Arg709* K710X c.2128 A4T p.Lys710* 2307insA c.2175dupA p.Glu726Argfs*4 L732X c.2195 T4G p.Leu732* 2347delG c.2215delG p.Val739Tyrfs*16 R764X c.2290C4T p.Arg764* 2585delT c.2453delT p.Leu818Trpfs*3 E822X c.2464G4T p.Glu822* 2622+1G4A c.2490+1G4A E831X c.2491G4T p.Glu831* W846X c.2537G4A p.Trp846* W846X (2670TGG4TGA) c.2538G4A p.Trp846* R851X c.2551C4T p.Arg851* 2711delT c.2583delT p.Phe861Leufs*3 S945L c.2834C4T p.Ser945Leu 2789+2insA c.2657+2_2657+3insA Q890X c.2668C4T p.Gln890* L927P c.2780 T4C p.Leu927Pro 3007delG c.2875delG p.Ala959Hisfs*9 G970R c.2908G4C p.Gly970Arg 3120G4A c.2988G4A function variants that cause CF disease when paired together; (ii) variants that retain residual CFTR function and are compatible with milder phenotypes such as CFTR-RD; (iii) variants with no clinical consequences; and (iv) variants of unproven or uncertain clinical relevance. Login to comment