ABCA4 p.Arg187Cys
| Predicted by SNAP2: | A: D (66%), C: D (66%), D: D (71%), E: D (71%), F: D (66%), G: D (71%), H: N (53%), I: D (63%), K: N (66%), L: D (63%), M: D (63%), N: N (53%), P: D (66%), Q: D (53%), S: D (53%), T: N (53%), V: D (63%), W: D (75%), Y: D (59%), |
| Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: N, C: D, D: N, E: N, F: D, G: N, H: N, I: D, K: N, L: N, M: N, N: N, P: N, Q: N, S: N, T: N, V: D, W: D, Y: D, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Molecular diagnostic testing by eyeGENE: analysis ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 31;55(9):5510-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14359. Alapati A, Goetz K, Suk J, Navani M, Al-Tarouti A, Jayasundera T, Tumminia SJ, Lee P, Ayyagari R
Molecular diagnostic testing by eyeGENE: analysis of patients with hereditary retinal dystrophy phenotypes involving central vision loss.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 31;55(9):5510-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14359., [PMID:25082885]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To analyze the genetic test results of probands referred to eyeGENE with a diagnosis of hereditary maculopathy. METHODS: Patients with Best macular dystrophy (BMD), Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy (DHRD), Sorsby fundus dystrophy (SFD), or late-onset retinal degeneration (LORD) were screened for mutations in BEST1, EFEMP1, TIMP3, and CTRP5, respectively. Patients with pattern dystrophy (PD) were screened for mutations in PRPH2, BEST1, ELOVL4, CTRP5, and ABCA4; patients with cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) were screened for mutations in CRX, ABCA4, PRPH2, ELOVL4, and the c.2513G>A p.Arg838His variant in GUCY2D. Mutation analysis was performed by dideoxy sequencing. Impact of novel variants was evaluated using the computational tool PolyPhen. RESULTS: Among the 213 unrelated patients, 38 had BMD, 26 DHRD, 74 PD, 8 SFD, 6 LORD, and 54 CRD; six had both PD and BMD, and one had no specific clinical diagnosis. BEST1 variants were identified in 25 BMD patients, five with novel variants of unknown significance (VUS). Among the five patients with VUS, one was diagnosed with both BMD and PD. A novel EFEMP1 variant was identified in one DHRD patient. TIMP3 novel variants were found in two SFD patients, PRPH2 variants in 14 PD patients, ABCA4 variants in four PD patients, and p.Arg838His GUCY2D mutation in six patients diagnosed with dominant CRD; one patient additionally had a CRX VUS. ABCA4 mutations were identified in 15 patients with recessive CRD. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 213 samples, 55 patients (26%) had known causative mutations, and 13 (6%) patients had a VUS that was possibly pathogenic. Overall, selective screening for mutations in BEST1, PRPH2, and ABCA4 would likely yield the highest success rate in identifying the genetic basis for macular dystrophy phenotypes. Because of the overlap in phenotypes between BMD and PD, it would be beneficial to screen genes associated with both diseases.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
39 Mutations and Unknown Variants Detected in Patients With Central Vision Loss Patient Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Molecular Diagnosis Late-onset retinal degeneration NA CTRP5 NA NA NA NA NA NA Sorsby fundus dystrophy Patient 1 TIMP3 1 c.113C>G p.Ser38Cys Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 2 TIMP3 1 c.113C>G p.Ser38Cys Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 3 TIMP3 5 c.610A>T p.Ser204Cys Het Mut Positive Doyne honeycomb dystrophy Patient 1 EFEMP1 9 c.1033C>T p.Arg345Trp Het Mut Positive Patient 2 EFEMP1 9 c.1033C>T p.Arg345Trp Het Mut Positive Patient 3 EFEMP1 IVS10 c.IVS10-14C>T None Het vAR/us NA NA Unconfirmed Best macular dystrophy Patient 1 BEST1 2 c.28G>A p.Ala10Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 2 BEST1 2 c.47C>T p.Ser16Phe Het Mut Positive Patient 3 BEST1 2 c.72G>T p.Trp24Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 4 BEST1 3 c.240C>A p.Phe80Leu Het Mut Positive Patient 5 BEST1 3 c.240C>A p.Phe80Leu Het Mut Positive Patient 6 BEST1 4 c.248G>C p.Gly83Ala Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 7 BEST1 4 c.277T>C p.Trp93Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 8 BEST1 4 c.279G>C p.Trp93Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 9 BEST1 6 c.652C>T p.Arg218Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 10 BEST1 6 c.652C>T p.Arg218Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 11 BEST1 6 c.680A>G p.Tyr227Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 12 BEST1 6 c.741G>A p.Arg218His Het Mut Positive Patient 13 BEST1 6 c.741G>A p.Arg218His Het Mut Positive Patient 14 BEST1 7 c.727G>A p.Ala243Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 15 BEST1 7 c.727G>A p.Ala243Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 16 BEST1 7 c.728C>T p.Ala243Val Het Mut Positive Patient 17 BEST1 7 c.728C>T p.Ala243Val Het Mut Positive Patient 18 BEST1 8 c.880C>T p.Leu294Phe Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 19 BEST1 8 c.887A>G p.Asn296Ser Het Mut Positive Patient 20 BEST1 8 c.903T>G p.Asp301Glu Het Mut Positive Patient 21 BEST1 8 c.903T>G p.Asp301Glu Het Mut Positive Patient 22 BEST1 8 c.910G>A p.Asp304Asn Het Mut Positive Patient 23 BEST1 8 c.925T>C p.Trp309Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Patient 24 BEST1 8 c.929T>C p.Ile310Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 25, case 3 BEST1 4 c.250T>G p.Phe84Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Pattern dystrophy Patient 1 ABCA4 6 c.634C>T p.Arg212Cys Het Mut Positive ABCA4 30 c.4469G>A p.Cys1490Tyr Het Mut Patient 2 ABCA4 17 c.2588G>C p.Gly863Ala Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 3 ABCA4 IVS26 c.3862&#fe;3A>G Abnormal splicing Het vAR/us Unconfirmed Patient 4 PRPH2 1 c.271T>A p.Tyr91Asn Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.909 Positive PRPH2 1 c.310-313del(AT) p.Ile104Val Het Mut Patient 5, case 6 PRPH2 1 c.422A>G p.Tyr141Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 6 PRPH2 1 c.422A>G p.Tyr141Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 7 PRPH2 1 c.515G>A p.Arg172Gln Het Mut Positive Patient 8 PRPH2 2 c.583C>T p.Arg195Stop Het Mut Positive Patient 9 PRPH2 2 c.629C>G p.Pro210Arg Het Mut Positive Patient 10 PRPH2 2 c.635G>C p.Ser212Thr Het Mut Positive Patient 11 PRPH2 2 c.683C>T p.Thr228Ile Het Mut Positive Patient 12 PRPH2 2 c.708C>G p.Tyr236Stop Het Mut Positive Patient 13, case 4 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut Positive TABLE 2. Continued Patient Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Molecular Diagnosis Patient 14 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut Positive Patient 15 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut Positive Patient 16 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut Positive Patient 17, case 2 ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 18 PRPH2 2 c.584G>A p.Arg195Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Positive Cone-rod dystrophy Patient 1, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2512C>T p.Arg838Cys Het Mut Positive Patient 2, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive Patient 3, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive Patient 4, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive Patient 5, dominant GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut Positive CRX 3 c.607T>C p.Ser213Pro Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.999 Patient 6, recessive ABCA4 2 c.156T>G p.His52Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.998 Positive ABCA4 3 c.161G>A p.Cys54Tyr Het Mut ABCA4 28 c.4169T>C p.Leu1390Pro Het Mut Patient 7, recessive ABCA4 16 c.2385C>T p.Ser795Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.99 Positive ABCA4 IVS40 c.5714&#fe;5G>A Splice Het Mut Patient 8, recessive ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Het Mut Positive ABCA4 45 c.6221G>T p.Gly2074Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 Patient 9, recessive ABCA4 IVS42 c.5898&#fe;1G<A Splice Het Mut Positive ABCA4 IVS42 c.5899-2delA Splice Het Mut Patient 10, recessive ABCA4 5 c.559C>T p.Arg187Cys Het Mut Positive ABCA4 40 c.5645T>C p.Met1882Thr Het Mut Patient 11, recessive ABCA4 6 c.768G>T p.Val256Val (abnlspl) Het Mut Positive ABCA4 31 c.4577C>T p.Thr1526Met Het Mut Patient 12, recessive ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Het Mut Positive ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Het Mut ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Hom Mut ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Hom Mut ABCA4 22 c.3322C>T p.Arg1108Cys Het Mut Patient 13, recessive ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Hom Mut Positive ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Hom Mut Patient 14, recessive ABCA4 13 c.1927G>A p.Val643Met Het Mut Positive ABCA4 24 c.3602T>G p.Leu1201Arg Het Mut ABCA4 36 c.5186T>C p.Leu1729Pro Het Mut Patient 15, recessive ABCA4 23 c.3364G>A p.Glu1122Lys Het Mut Positive ABCA4 48 c.6529G>A p.Asp2177Asn Het Mut Patient 16, recessive ABCA4 35 c.4918C>T p.Arg1640Trp Het Mut Positive ABCA4 28 c.4222T>C p.Trp1408Arg Het Mut Patient 17, recessive ABCA4 11 c.1532G>A p.Arg511His Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 18, recessive ABCA4 27 c.3899G>A p.Arg1300Gln Het vAR/us Benign 0.143 Unconfirmed Patient 19, recessive ABCA4 13 c.1933G>A p.Asp645Asn Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 20, recessive ABCA4 35 c.4918C>T p.Arg1640Trp Het Mut Unconfirmed Patient 21, recessive ABCA4 IVS7 c.859-9T>C Unknown Hom vAR/us NA NA Unconfirmed Molecular Diagnostic Testing by eyeGENE IOVS j September 2014 j Vol. 55 j No. 9 j were screened for the p.Arg838His mutation in GUCY2D, and mutations in the CRX, ELOVL4, PRPH2, and/or ABCA4 genes.
X
ABCA4 p.Arg187Cys 25082885:39:4650
status: NEW116 Mutations or Unknown Variants Detected in Patients With Central Vision Loss Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Frequency* Variant ID Late-onset retinal degeneration CTRP5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Sorsby fundus dystrophy TIMP3 1 c.113C>G p.Ser38Cys Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 2 TIMP3 5 c.610A>T p.Ser204Cys Het Mut 1 CM941325/ rs137853298 Doyne honeycomb dystrophy EFEMP1 9 c.1033C>T p.Arg345Trp Het Mut 2 CM990504 EFEMP1 IVS10 c.IVS10-14C>T None Het vAR/us NA NA 1 Best macular dystrophy BEST1 2 c.28G>A p.Ala10Thr Het Mut 1 CM982017 BEST1 2 c.47C>T p.Ser16Phe Het Mut 1 CM010520 BEST1 2 c.72G>T p.Trp24Cys Het Mut 1 CM982018 BEST1 3 c.240C>A p.Phe80Leu Het Mut 2 CM004423 BEST1 4 c.248G>C p.Gly83Ala Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 4 c.277T>C p.Trp93Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 4 c.279G>C p.Trp93Cys Het Mut 1 rs28940273/ CM982021 BEST1 6 c.652C>T p.Arg218Cys Het Mut 2 CM982023 BEST1 6 c.680A>G p.Tyr227Cys Het Mut 1 CM982024 BEST1 6 c.741G>A p.Arg218His Het Mut 2 CM003486 BEST1 7 c.727G>A p.Ala243Thr Het Mut 2 CM004434 BEST1 7 c.728C>T p.Ala243Val Het Mut 2 rs28940570/ CM00841 BEST1 8 c.880C>T p.Leu294Phe Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 8 c.887A>G p.Asn296Ser Het Mut 1 CM010524 BEST1 8 c.903T>G p.Asp301Glu Het Mut 2 CM991243 BEST1 8 c.910G>A p.Asp304Asn Het Mut 1 CM024219 BEST1 8 c.925T>C p.Trp309Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 BEST1 8 c.929T>C p.Ile310Thr Het Mut 1 CM000843 BEST1 4 c.250T>G p.Phe84Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 Pattern dystrophy ABCA4 6 c.634C>T p.Arg212Cys Het Mut 1 rs61750200 ABCA4 17 c.2588G>C p.Gly863Ala Het Mut 1 CM970003/ rs76157638 ABCA4 IVS26 c.3862&#fe;3A>G Abnormal splicing Het vAR/us 1 NA ABCA4 30 c.4469G>A p.Cys1490Tyr Het Mut 1 CM990056/ rs61751402 ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut 1 CS057513 PRPH2 1 c.271T>A p.Tyr91Asn Het vAR/us Probably damaging .909 1 PRPH2 1 c.310-313del(AT) p.Ile104Val Het Mut 1 NA/Deletion PRPH2 1 c.422A>G p.Tyr141Cys Het Mut 2 CM010125/ rs61755781 PRPH2 1 c.515G>A p.Arg172Gln Het Mut 1 CM930637/ rs61755792 PRPH2 2 c.583C>T p.Arg195Stop Het Mut 1 CM032999 PRPH2 2 c.629C>G p.Pro210Arg Het Mut 1 CM941210 PRPH2 2 c.635G>C p.Ser212Thr Het Mut 1 CM971289/ rs61755801 PRPH2 2 c.683C>T p.Thr228Ile Het Mut 1 TMP_ESP_6_ 42672248 PRPH2 2 c.708C>G p.Tyr236Stop Het Mut 1 rs61755813 PRPH2 IVS2 c.828&#fe;3A>T Splice Het Mut 4 CS010139 PRPH2 2 c.584G>A p.Arg195Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 TABLE 3. Continued Gene Exon DNA Change Protein Change Genotype Result PolyPhen Description PolyPhen Score Frequency* Variant ID Cone-rod dystrophy ABCA4 2 c.156T>G p.His52Gln Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.998 1 ABCA4 3 c.161G>A p.Cys54Tyr Het Mut 1 CM990012/ rs150774447 ABCA4 28 c.4169T>C p.Leu1390Pro Het Mut 1 CM014810/ rs61752430 ABCA4 16 c.2385C>T p.Ser795Arg Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.99 1 ABCA4 IVS40 c.5714&#fe;5G>A Splice Het Mut 1 CS982057 ABCA4 27 c.3899G>A p.Arg1300Gln Het vAR/us Benign 0.143 1 ABCA4 32 c.4661A>G p.Glu1554Gly Het vAR/us Benign 0.326 1 ABCA4 30 c.4383G>A p.Trp1461Stop Het Mut 1 Stop/NA ABCA4 IVS38 c.5461-10T>C None Het Mut NA NA 2 CS057513 ABCA4 22 c.3259G>A p.Glu1087Lys Het Mut 1 CM970008/ rs61751398 ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Het Mut 2 CM970016/ rs1800553 ABCA4 45 c.6221G>T p.Gly2074Val Het vAR/us Probably damaging 1 1 ABCA4 IVS42 c.5898&#fe;1G<A Splice Het Mut 1 CS011524 ABCA4 IVS42 c.5899-2delA Splice Het Mut 1 rs3112831 CRX 3 c.607T>C p.Ser213Pro Het vAR/us Probably damaging 0.999 1 ABCA4 5 c.559C>T p.Arg187Cys Het Mut 1 COSM913472 ABCA4 40 c.5645T>C p.Met1882Thr Het Mut 1 rs4147830 ABCA4 6 c.768G>T p.Val256Val (abnlspl) Het Mut 1 CM990057/ rs61750152 ABCA4 31 c.4577C>T p.Thr1526Met Het Mut 1 rs62645944 ABCA4 11 c.1532G>A p.Arg511His Het Mut 1 rs140482171 ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Het Mut 1 CM990022/ rs61751392 ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Het Mut 1 CM970006/ rs61751374 ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro Hom Mut 2 CM990022/ rs61751392 ABCA4 21 c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val Hom Mut 2 CM970006/ rs61751374 ABCA4 22 c.3322C>T p.Arg1108Cys Het Mut 1 CM990039/ rs61750120 ABCA4 13 c.1927G>A p.Val643Met Het Mut 1 CM014293/ rs61749417/ rs143548435 ABCA4 24 c.3602T>G p.Leu1201Arg Het Mut 1 CM990042/ rs61750126 ABCA4 36 c.5186T>C p.Leu1729Pro Het Mut 1 CM990062/ rs61750567 ABCA4 13 c.1933G>A p.Asp645Asn Het Mut 1 rs617494181933 ABCA4 23 c.3364G>A p.Glu1122Lys Het Mut 1 CM990041 ABCA4 48 c.6529G>A p.Asp2177Asn Het Mut 1 CM970023/ rs1800555 ABCA4 35 c.4918C>T p.Arg1640Trp Het Mut 2 CM983728/ rs61751404 ABCA4 28 c.4222T>C p.Trp1408Arg Het Mut 1 CM990048/ rs61750135 GUCY2D 13 c.2512C>T p.Arg838Cys Het Mut 1 rs61750172 GUCY2D 13 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His Het Mut 5 CM012606/ rs61750173 ABCA4 IVS7 c.859-9T>C Unknown Hom vAR/us NA NA 1 ABCA4 42 c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu Hom Mut 1 CM970016/ rs1800553 ABCA4 43 c.5917delG Deletion Hom Mut 1 RISN_ABCR: c.5917delG Molecular Diagnostic Testing by eyeGENE IOVS j September 2014 j Vol. 55 j No. 9 j Six patients with late-onset retinal pathology and drusen had well-characterized clinical data.
X
ABCA4 p.Arg187Cys 25082885:116:3528
status: NEW