ABCA4 p.Asn1442Lys
| Predicted by SNAP2: | A: D (59%), C: D (63%), D: N (53%), E: N (57%), F: D (71%), G: N (53%), H: N (57%), I: D (63%), K: N (66%), L: D (66%), M: D (63%), P: D (59%), Q: N (57%), R: N (61%), S: N (72%), T: N (72%), V: D (59%), W: D (85%), Y: D (71%), |
| Predicted by PROVEAN: | A: N, C: N, D: N, E: N, F: D, G: N, H: N, I: N, K: N, L: N, M: N, P: N, Q: N, R: N, S: N, T: N, V: N, W: D, Y: N, |
[switch to compact view]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
[hide] Analysis of the ABCA4 gene by next-generation sequ... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 31;52(11):8479-87. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8182. Zernant J, Schubert C, Im KM, Burke T, Brown CM, Fishman GA, Tsang SH, Gouras P, Dean M, Allikmets R
Analysis of the ABCA4 gene by next-generation sequencing.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 31;52(11):8479-87. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8182., [PMID:21911583]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: To find all possible disease-associated variants in coding sequences of the ABCA4 gene in a large cohort of patients diagnosed with ABCA4-associated diseases. METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight patients who had been clinically diagnosed with Stargardt disease, cone-rod dystrophy, and other ABCA4-associated phenotypes were prescreened for mutations in ABCA4 with the ABCA4 microarray, resulting in finding 1 of 2 expected mutations in 111 patients and 0 of 2 mutations in 57 patients. The next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy was applied to these patients to sequence the entire coding region and the splice sites of the ABCA4 gene. Identified new variants were confirmed or rejected by Sanger sequencing and analyzed for possible pathogenicity by in silico programs and, where possible, by segregation analyses. RESULTS: Sequencing was successful in 159 of 168 patients and identified the second disease-associated allele in 49 of 103 (~48%) of patients with one previously identified mutation. Among those with no mutations, both disease-associated alleles were detected in 4 of 56 patients, and one mutation was detected in 10 of 56 patients. The authors detected a total of 57 previously unknown, possibly pathogenic, variants: 29 missense, 4 nonsense, 9 small deletions and 15 splice-site-altering variants. Of these, 55 variants were deemed pathogenic by a combination of predictive methods and segregation analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Many mutations in the coding sequences of the ABCA4 gene are still unknown, and many possibly reside in noncoding regions of the ABCA4 locus. Although the ABCA4 array remains a good first-pass screening option, the NGS platform is a time- and cost-efficient tool for screening large cohorts.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
120 Novel Variants Detected by NGS in the ABCA4 Gene and Results of Analysis Using Bioinformatics Software Nucleotide Change Protein Splicing Score Original Splicing Score for New Variant Average Difference Polyphen SIFT SpliceSite Finder-like Gene Splicer SpliceSite Finder-like Gene Splicer c.91Tb0e;C p.W31R 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.999) W c.184Cb0e;T p.P62S 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.999) P c.770Tb0e;G p.L257R 0 0 0 0 0 Possibly damaging (0.308) m i F L c.1253Tb0e;C p.F418S 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.999) F c.1531Cb0e;T p.R511C 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (1.000) R c.1745Ab0e;G p.N582S 0 0 0.74 0.82 77.8 Probably damaging (0.894) d K N c.1868Ab0e;G p.Q623R 0 0.24 0 0 12.1 Probably damaging (0.937) Q c.1964Tb0e;G p.F655C 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.999) F c.1977Gb0e;A p.M659I 0 0 0.75 0.85 79.8 Probably damaging (0.999) M c.2243Gb0e;A p.C748Y 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.928) g S A C c.2401Gb0e;A p.A801T 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.98) A c.2893Ab0e;T p.N965Y 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.999) N c.3148Gb0e;A p.G1050S 0 0 0 0 0 Possibly damaging (0.786) G c.3205Ab0e;G p.K1069E 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.993) K c.3279Cb0e;A p.D1093E 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.99) D c.3350Cb0e;T p.T1117I 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.995) T c.3655Gb0e;C p.A1219P 0.77 0 0.74 0 1.5 Probably damaging (0.991) A c.3812Ab0e;G p.E1271G 0.8 0.35 0.71 0 21.8 Probably damaging (0.995) E c.4177Gb0e;A p.V1393I 0 0 0 0 0 Benign (0.000) VI c.4217Ab0e;G p.H1406R 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.986) r p q a t k e g n S D H c.4248Cb0e;A p.F1416L 0.79 0.1 0.79 0.1 0.27 Probably damaging (0.891) F c.4326Cb0e;A p.N1442K 0 0 0 0 0 Possibly damaging (0.374) a g d s T N c.4467Gb0e;T p.R1489S 0.85 0.43 0.78 0.24 12.8 Benign (0.047) p h l s n a e T Q K R c.4670Ab0e;G p.Y1557C 0.85 0.13 0.80 0 8.8 Probably damaging (0.999) f W Y c.5138Ab0e;G p.Q1713R 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.997) Q c.5177Cb0e;A p.T1726N 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.880) s A T c.5646Gb0e;A p.M1882I 0 0 0.75 0 37.4 Probably damaging (0.999) M c.6306Cb0e;A p.D2102E 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.99) D c.6718Ab0e;G p.T2240A 0 0 0 0 0 Probably damaging (0.991) T c.160af9;2Tb0e;C 0.81 0.86 0.79 0 44.4 c.1240afa;2Ab0e;G 0.82 0.81 0 0 81.5 c.2382af9;1Gb0e;A 0.79 0.64 0 0 71.7 c.2919afa;2Ab0e;G 0.9 0.92 0 0 90.9 c.3522af9;5delG 0.87 0.57 0 0.18 63 c.3523afa;1Gb0e;A 0.9 0.89 0 0 89 Splice site shift of 1 bp c.3814afa;2Ab0e;G 0.91 0.9 0 0 90.6 c.4352af9;1Gb0e;A 0.74 0.82 0 0 78 c.4635afa;1Gb0e;T 0.86 0.89 0 0 87.5 New splice site 7 bp downstream c.5312af9;1Gb0e;A 0.81 0.91 0 0 86.1 c.5836afa;2Ab0e;C 0.89 0.87 0 0 88 c.6387afa;1Gb0e;T 0.77 0.87 0 0 82 c.6479af9;1Gb0e;A 0.82 0.87 0 0 85 c.6479af9;1Gb0e;C 0.82 0.31 0 0 56.6 c.1100afa;6Tb0e;A 0 0 0.9 0.93 91.6 Creates new splice site c.351_352delAG p.S119fs Frameshift c.564delA p.E189Cfs Frameshift c.885delC p.L296Cfs Frameshift c.1374delA p.T459Qfs Frameshift c.3543delT p.K1182Rfs Frameshift c.3846delA p.G1283Dfs Frameshift c.4734delG p.L1580* Stop codon c.5932delA p.T1979Qfs Frameshift c.6317_6323del p.R2107_ GCCGCAT M2108delfs Frameshift c.121Gb0e;A p.W41* Stop codon c.318Tb0e;G p.Y106* Stop codon c.1906Cb0e;T p.Q636* Stop codon c.4639Ab0e;T p.K1547* Stop codon For SpliceSiteFinder and GeneSplicer, 1 is the highest score for splice site activity and 0 is the lowest.
X
ABCA4 p.Asn1442Lys 21911583:120:1694
status: NEW[hide] Detection rate of pathogenic mutations in ABCA4 us... Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;130(11):1486-90. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1697. Downes SM, Packham E, Cranston T, Clouston P, Seller A, Nemeth AH
Detection rate of pathogenic mutations in ABCA4 using direct sequencing: clinical and research implications.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;130(11):1486-90. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1697., [PMID:23143460]
Abstract [show]
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
30 In 3 of the 6 patients with a historical diagnosis Table. Results From Direct Sequencing of the ABCA4 Gene in 50 Patients (continued) Subject No. Change 1 Change 2 Phase Segregation Age at Onset, y Phenotype Grade, Macula Flecks/ Cones/Rodsa Additional Variants Conclusion Nucleotide Amino Acid Nucleotide Amino Acid 11 4139Cb0e;T P1380L 5714 af9; 5Gb0e;A Splice NK NK 19 STGD m/0/0 0 2 PVs 12 4457Cb0e;T P1486L 4457Cb0e;T P1486L In trans Unaffected sibling carries 1 mutation 25 STGD maf9;af9;/1/1 0 2 PVs 13 4537dupC Q1513fs 6391Gb0e;A E2131K In trans Unaffected parents carriers 10 STGD maf9;/0/0 R152Q in cis with Q1513fs, E2131K in cis with E471K 2 PVs 14 6079Cb0e;T L2027F 6079Cb0e;T L2027F In trans Unaffected sibling carrier 28 STGD maf9;af9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 15 5018 af9; 2Tb0e;C NA 6316Cb0e;T R2106C In trans Affected sibling with same mutations 17 STGD m/0/1 0 2 PVs 16 3004Cb0e;T R1002Wb 1957Cb0e;T R653C In trans NK 16 STGD m/0/1 0 2 PVs 17 1253Tb0e;C F418S 2588Gb0e;C G863A NK NK 52 STGD maf9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 18 6709Ab0e;C T2237Pb 3064Gb0e;A E1022K In trans 2 Affected siblings with same mutations 6 STGD maf9;af9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 19 5260Tb0e;G Y1754D 4469Gb0e;A C1490Y In trans NK 12 STGD maf9;af9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 20 551Cb0e;T S184Fb 4793Cb0e;A A1598D NK 2 Affected siblings with same mutations 58 STGD m/NP/NP 0 2 PVs 21 550-551TCb0e;CG S184Rb 5882Gb0e;A G1961E In trans Affected sibling with same mutations 25 STGD maf9;af9;/0/0 0 2 PVs 22 5313-3Cb0e;G Spliceb 5882Gb0e;A G1961E In trans Unaffected parents carriers 47 STGD m/0/1 0 2 PVs 23 2588Gb0e;C G863A 5461-10Tb0e;C Disease-associated allele, unknown mechanism In trans NA 26 STGD maf9;af9;/3/1 1 In cis with G863A 2 PVs 24 5537Tb0e;C I1846T 5461-10Tb0e;C Disease-associated allele, unknown mechanism In trans Unaffected son carries I1846T only 17 STGD maf9;af9;/3/3 0 2 PVs 25 6089Gb0e;A R2030Q 5461-10Tb0e;C Disease-associated allele, unknown mechanism In trans Unaffected sibling carries R2030Q 4 STGD m/NP/NP 0 2 PVs 26 6730-1Gb0e;C Spliceb 2588Gb0e;C G863A NK NK 15 STGD NP/NP/NP 0 2 PVs 27 3291Ab0e;T R1097Sb 3056Cb0e;T T1019M In trans NK 9 STGD NP/NP/NP 1 In cis with R1097S 2 PVs 28 498delT L167HisfsX2b Not present NA NA NK 28 STGD m/1/1 0 1 PV 29 2345Gb0e;A W782Xb Not present NA NA Unaffected mother carries mutation 25 STGD m/1/1 0 1 PV 30 2588Gb0e;C G863A 4326Cb0e;A N1442K NK NK 36 STGD maf9;/0/0 0 1 PV af9; N1442K (unlikely) 31 2966Tb0e;C V989A Not present NA NA NK 49 STGD m/1/1 0 1 PV (continued) ARCH OPHTHALMOL/VOL 130 (NO. 11), NOV 2012 WWW.ARCHOPHTHALMOL.COM 1487 (c)2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: http://archopht.jamanetwork.com/ by a Semmelweis University Budapest User on 12/06/2015 lopathy is genetically heterogeneous. A total of 10 novel mutations were identified (Table).
X
ABCA4 p.Asn1442Lys 23143460:30:2500
status: NEWX
ABCA4 p.Asn1442Lys 23143460:30:2549
status: NEW[hide] ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing... Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570. Fujinami K, Zernant J, Chana RK, Wright GA, Tsunoda K, Ozawa Y, Tsubota K, Webster AR, Moore AT, Allikmets R, Michaelides M
ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing in a British cohort.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 11;54(10):6662-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12570., [PMID:23982839]
Abstract [show]
PURPOSE: We applied a recently reported next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy for screening the ABCA4 gene in a British cohort with ABCA4-associated disease and report novel mutations. METHODS: We identified 79 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ABCA4-associated disease who had a single variant identified by the ABCA4 microarray. Comprehensive phenotypic data were obtained, and the NGS strategy was applied to identify the second allele by means of sequencing the entire coding region and adjacent intronic sequences of the ABCA4 gene. Identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and assessed for pathogenicity by in silico analysis. RESULTS: Of the 42 variants detected by prescreening with the microarray, in silico analysis suggested that 34, found in 66 subjects, were disease-causing and 8, found in 13 subjects, were benign variants. We detected 42 variants by NGS, of which 39 were classified as disease-causing. Of these 39 variants, 31 were novel, including 16 missense, 7 splice-site-altering, 4 nonsense, 1 in-frame deletion, and 3 frameshift variants. Two or more disease-causing variants were confirmed in 37 (47%) of 79 patients, one disease-causing variant in 36 (46%) subjects, and no disease-causing variant in 6 (7%) individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the NGS platform for ABCA4 screening enabled detection of the second disease-associated allele in approximately half of the patients in a British cohort where one mutation had been detected with the arrayed primer extension (APEX) array. The time- and cost-efficient NGS strategy is useful in screening large cohorts, which will be increasingly valuable with the advent of ABCA4-directed therapies.
Comments [show]
None has been submitted yet.
No. Sentence Comment
56 40 c.4926C>G p.S1642R DC c.5041_5055del GTGGTTGCCATCTGC p.V1681_C1685del DC 2 41 c.4956T>G p.Y1652* DC 1 42 c.5018&#fe;2T>C Splice site DC 1 43 c.5461-10T>C DC c.6385A>G p.S2129G PDC 2 44 c.5461-10T>C DC 1 45 c.5461-10T>C DC 1 46 c.5461-10T>C DC 1 47 c.5461-10T>C DC 1 48 c.5461-10T>C DC 1 49 c.5461-10T>C DC 1 50 c.5461-10T>C DC 1 51 c.5585-1G>A Splice site DC 1 52 c.5714&#fe;5G>A Splice site DC c.6209C>G p.T2070R DC 2 53 c.5882G>A p.G1961E DC c.2686A>G p.K896E B 1 54 c.5882G>A p.G1961E DC c.3050&#fe;1G>C Splice site DC 2 55 c.5882G>A p.G1961E DC c.3392delC/3393C>G p.A1131Gfs DC 2 56 c.5882G>A p.G1961E DC c.4539&#fe;2T>G Splice site DC 2 57 c.5882G>A p.G1961E DC c.4552A>C p.S1518R DC 2 58 c.5882G>A p.G1961E DC c.5899-2delA Splice site DC 2 59 c.5882G>A p.G1961E DC 1 60 c.6079C>T p.L2027F DC c.1906C>T p.Q636* DC 2 61 c.6079C>T p.L2027F DC c.3322C>T p.R1108C DC 2 Allele 2 (p.R1108C) was APEX-false-negative 62 c.6079C>T p.L2027F DC c.3370G>T p.D1124Y DC 2 63 c.6079C>T p.L2027F DC 1 64 c.6089G>A p.R2030Q DC c.4326C>A p.N1442K DC 2 65 c.6445C>T p.R2149* DC 1 66 c.6709A>C p.T2237P DC c.5899-3_5899-2delTA Splice site DC 2 67 c.2971G>C p.G991R B c.4538A>G p.Q1513R DC 1 68 c.3602T>G p.L1201R B c.1749G>C p.K583N DC 1 69 c.3602T>G p.L1201R B c.1982_1983insG p.A662fs DC 1 70 c.3602T>G p.L1201R B c.2972G>T p.G991V DC 1 71 c.4685T>C p.I1562T B c.3289A>T p.R1097* DC 1 72 c.6320G>A p.R2107H B c.2510T>C p.L837P DC 1 73 c.6320G>A p.R2107H B c.4352&#fe;1G>A Splice site DC 1 74 c.2701A>G p.T901A B 0 75 c.3602T>G p.L1201R B 0 76 c.4283C>T p.T1428M B 0 77 c.466A>G p.I156V B 0 78 c.466A>G p.I156V B 0 79 c.4715C>T p.T1572M B 0 Putative novel variants are shown in italics.
X
ABCA4 p.Asn1442Lys 23982839:56:1030
status: NEW62 Hum Var Score (0-1) Site Wt CV Mt CV CV % Variation 3 c.161G>A p.C54Y 1 1 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.11 PRD 0.994 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs150774447) 3 c.223T>G p.C75G 1 2 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. NA POD 0.603 No change ND 5 c.466A>G p.I156V 2 77, 78 [ [ Papaioannou M, et al. 16 Tol. 0.46 B 0.003 No change 16/13006 db SNP (rs112467008) Benign 6 c.655A>T p.R219* 1 11 [ Xi Q, et al. 27 ND 6 c.740A>C p.N247T 1 3 [ [ APEX Del. NA B 0.135 No change ND 6 c.768G>T Splice site 1 4 [ [ Klevering BJ, et al. 22 Tol. 0.56 NA Don. 70.4 58 Site broken (17.51) ND 9 c.1222C>T p.R408* 1 5 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 ND 12 c.1726G>C p.D576H 1 36 [ Downs K, et al. 25 POD 0.688 Acc. 68.1 39.1 Site broken (42.54) 1/13006 13 c.1804C>T p.R602W 1 6 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 B 0.129 No change ND db SNP (rs 6179409) 13 c.1805G>A p.R602Q 1 7 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.04 PRD 0.513 Acc. 48.9 77.9 New site (&#fe;59.14) 2/13006 db SNP (rs61749410) 13 c.1906C>T p.Q636* 3 12, 13, 60 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs145961131) 13 c.1922G>C p.C641S 1 8 [ [ Stenirri S, et al. 24 Del. 0.00 No change ND db SNP (rs61749416) 14 c.1957C>T p.R653C 2 9, 10 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.999 No change ND db SNP (rs61749420) 17 c.2588G>C p.G863A/ p.DelG863 5 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 / Maugeri A, et al. 29 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.996 No change 68/13006 db SNP (rs76157638) 18 c.2701A>G p.T901A 1 74 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.82 B 0.008 23/13006 db SNP (rs139655975) Benign 19 c.2894A>G p.N965S 1 16 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.03 PRD 0.981 Acc. 53.4 82.3 New site (&#fe;54.26) ND db SNP (rs201471607) 20 c.2971G>C p.G991R 1 67 [ [ Yatsenko AN, et al. 13 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 28/13006 db SNP (rs147484266) Benign 22 c.3064G>A p.E1022K 2 17, 18 [ [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Del. 0.00 PRD 1.000 No change ND db SNP (rs61749459) 22 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs 5 19, 20, 21, 22, 25 [ [ APEX ND False-negative in APEX in patient 25 22 c.3292C>T p.R1098C 1 23 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. NA PRD 0.999 No change ND 22 c.3322C>T p.R1108C 3 16, 24, 61 [ [ Rozet JM, et al. 10 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.986 No change 1/13006 db SNP (rs61750120) False-negative in APEX in patients 16 and 61 23 c.3386G>A p.R1129H 1 25 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 PRD 0.989 No change ND False-negative in NGS in patient 25 24 c.3602T>G p.L1201R 4 72, 73, 74, 79 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Tol. 0.37 B 0.052 Don. 61.3 73.7 New site (20.08) 416/13006 db SNP (rs61750126) Benign 28 c.4139C>T p.P1380L 7 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.01 B 0.377 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs61750130) 28 c.4234C>T p.Q1412* 1 33 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 ND db SNP (rs61750137) 29 c.4283C>T p.T1428M 1 76 [ [ APEX Tol. 0.15 B 0.010 No change 2/13006 db SNP (rs1800549) Benign 29 c.4319T>C p.F1440S 1 34 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 POD 0.744 No change ND dbSNP (rs61750141) 29 c.4326C>A p.N1442K 1 64 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Tol. NA POD 0.374 No change ND 29 c.4328G>A p.R1443H 1 35 [ [ Rivera A, et al. 17 Del. 0.02 PRD 0.999 No change 1/13006 dbSNP (rs61750142) IVS29 c.4352&#fe;1G>A Splice site 1 73 [ Zernant J, et al. 5 Don. 82.3 55.4 WT site broken (32.62) ND 30 c.4469G>A p.C1490Y 2 36, 37 [ [ Lewis RA, et al. 11 Del. 0.00 PRD 0.994 No change ND dbSNP (rs61751402) 30 c.4538A>G p.Q1513R 1 67 [ Webster AR, et al. 7 Tol. NA Benign 0.043 Acc. 91.7 62.8 Site broken (31.55) ND T ABLE 3. Continued Exon/ IVS Nucleotide Substitution Protein Change/ Effect N of Alleles Identified Pt Method Previous Report SIFT Polyphen 2 HSF Matrix Allele Freq. by EVS Reference Comment APEX NGS Pred. Tol. Index (0-1) Pred.
X
ABCA4 p.Asn1442Lys 23982839:62:2882
status: NEW