ABCC7 p.Glu1104Lys

[switch to full view]
Comments [show]
Publications
PMID: 22581207 [PubMed] Krulisova V et al: "Prospective and parallel assessments of cystic fibrosis newborn screening protocols in the Czech Republic: IRT/DNA/IRT versus IRT/PAP and IRT/PAP/DNA."
No. Sentence Comment
81 According to the protocol, this result indicated the sequencing of the Table 1 Parallel comparison of CF NBS protocols IRT/DNAa /IRT IRT/PAP IRT/PAP/DNAa Newborns screened (N) 106,522 106,522 106,522 IRT positives (N; %) 1,158 (1.09) 3,155 (2.96) 3,155 (2.96) PAP positives (N; %) - 260 (0.24) 260 (0.24) Median age (range) at the availability of DNA-testinga results (days) 36 (9-222b ) - 36 (9-222b ) 1 and/or 2 CF mutations detected (N; %) 76 (0.07) - 27 (0.03) Recalled newborns for repeated IRT examination (N; %) 47 (0.04) - - Positive CF NBS (N; %) 123 (0.12) 260 (0.24) 27 (0.03) Positive IRT in newborns recalled for repeated examination (N) 1 - - ST indicated (N; %) 77 (0.07) 260 (0.24) 27 (0.03) ST carried out (N; % of indicated ST) 72c (93.51) 204c (78.46) 24c (88.89) CF carriers (N) 55 - 12 Prevalence of CF carriers 1 in 21 - 1 in 22 Diagnosed CF patients (N) 19 16 15 False positives based on performed ST (N; % of all cases screened) 99d (0.09) 188 (0.18) 9 (0.01) Newborns with equivocal diagnosis [F508del/R117H-IVS-8 T(7) and ST<30 mmol/L; N] 2 - 0 False negatives (N) 2 5 6 Total of CF patients detected (N) 21e Median age (range) at diagnosis (days) 36 (9-57)e CF prevalence 1 in 5,072e Sensitivity (TP/TP+FN) 0.9048 0.7619 0.7142 Specificity (TN/TN+FP) 0.9991 0.9982 0.9999 PPV (TP/TP+FP) 0.1610 0.0784 0.625 N number, % of all cases screened, TP true positives, FN false negatives, TN true negatives, FP false positives, PPV positive predictive value, ST sweat test a CF-causing mutations covered by Elucigene assays ("legacy" nomenclature) with the CF-EU1Tm accounting for: p.Arg347Pro (R347P), c.2657+ 5G>A (2789+5G>A), c.2988+1G>A (3120+1G>A), c.579+1G>T (711+1G>T), p.Arg334Trp (R334W), p.Ile507del (I507del), p.Phe508del (F508del), c.3718-2477C>T (3849+10kbC>T), p.Phe316LeufsX12 (1078delT), p.Trp1282X (W1282X), p.Arg560Thr (R560T), p.Arg553X (R553X), p.Gly551Asp (G551D), p.Met1101Lys (M1101K), p.Gly542X (G542X), p.Leu1258PhefsX7 (3905insT), p.Ser1251Asn (S1251N), c.1585-1G>A (1717-1G>A), p.Arg117His (R117H), p.Asn1303Lys (N1303K), p.Gly85Glu (G85E), c.1766+1G>A (1898+1G>A), p.Lys684AsnfsX38 (2184delA), p.Asp1152His (D1152H), c.54-5940_273+10250del (CFTRdele2,3), p.Pro67Leu (P67L), p.Glu60X (E60X), p.Lys1177SerfsX15 (3659delC), c.489+1G>T (621+1G>T), p.Ala455Glu (A455E), p.Arg1162X (R1162X), p.Leu671X (2143delT), c.1210-12T[n] (IVS8-T(n) variant), including additional mutations in the CF-EU2Tm : p.Gln890X (Q890X), p.Tyr515X (1677delTA), p.Val520Phe (V520F), c.3140-26A>G (3272-26A>G), p.Leu88IlefsX22 (394delTT), p.Arg1066Cys (R1066C), p.Ile105SerfsX2 (444delA), p.Tyr1092X (C>A) (Y1092X(C>A)), p.Arg117Cys (R117C), p.Ser549Asn (S549N), p.Ser549ArgT>G (S549R T>G), p.Tyr122X (Y122X), p.Arg1158X (R1158X), p.Leu206Trp (L206W), c.1680-886A>G (1811+1.6kbA>G), p.Arg347His (R347H), p.Val739TyrfsX16 (2347delG) and p.Trp846X (W846X) b failed DNA isolation from DBS, including repetition of DNA-testing c deceased patient or non-compliance with referrals (five CF carriers in IRT/DNA/IRT, 56 newborns in IRT/PAP, three CF carriers in IRT/PAP/DNA) d comprising newborns with repeated IRT (47 newborns) e aggregate data from all protocols entire CFTR coding region in both newborns, and led to the identification of p.Ile336Lys (I336K) and p.Glu1104Lys (E1104K) mutations.
X
ABCC7 p.Glu1104Lys 22581207:81:3280
status: NEW
X
ABCC7 p.Glu1104Lys 22581207:81:3292
status: NEW
Login to comment

109 Table 2 False negatives due to mean PAP concentrations below the cut-off IRT (ng/mL) PAP (ng/mL) CFTR Genotypea Sweat chloride concentration (mmol/L) Patient 1 174 0.93 F508del/ F508del 109.6 Patient 2 337 0.49 F508del/ F508del 98.7 Patient 3 203 0.42 F508del/ F508del 103.7 Patient 4 115 0.67 F508del/ I507del 93.2 Patient 5b 87.8 1.43 G542X/ E1104K 74.5 a legacy nomenclature b pancreatic sufficient patient (fecal Elastase-1 level was 507 μg/g) IRT/PAP and IRT/PAP/DNA protocols Five CF patients were false negative within the IRT/PAP protocol due to low PAP concentrations (Table 2).
X
ABCC7 p.Glu1104Lys 22581207:109:344
status: NEW
Login to comment

PMID: 23276700 [PubMed] Krenkova P et al: "Distribution of CFTR mutations in the Czech population: positive impact of integrated clinical and laboratory expertise, detection of novel/de novo alleles and relevance for related/derived populations."
No. Sentence Comment
62 There are over 10 million inhabitants in the country, which according to population genetic analyses, is a representative of the CE ethnic composition [3], with significant overlaps with Table 1 (continued) Mutations/HGVS nomenclature/ Mutations/traditional nomenclature, legacy name/ Legacy exon/intron No. of alleles % 65. c.2290CNT R764X# Ex13 1 0.08 66. c.2490+1GNA 2622+1GNA# In13 1 0.08 67. c.2538GNA W846X*# Ex14a 1 0.08 68. c.2551CNT R851X# Ex14a 1 0.08 69. c.2589_2599delAATTTGGTGCT 2721del11 Ex14a 1 0.08 70. c.2705delG 2837delG Ex15 1 0.08 71. c.2789delG 2921delG Ex15 1 0.08 72. c.2803_2813delCTACCACTGGT 2935del11 Ex15 1 0.08 73. c.2856GNC M952I Ex15 1 0.08 74. c.2991GNC L997F# Ex17a 1 0.08 75. c.3106delA 3238delA Ex17a 1 0.08 76. c.3136GNT E1046X Ex17a 1 0.08 77. c.3139GNC G1047R Ex17a 1 0.08 78. c.3196CNT R1066C*# Ex17b 1 0.08 79. c.3196CNG R1066G Ex17b 1 0.08 80. c.3302TNG M1101R Ex17b 1 0.08 81. c.3310GNA E1104K Ex17b 1 0.08 82. c.3353CNT S1118F Ex17b 1 0.08 83. c.3472CNT R1158X*# Ex19 1 0.08 84. c.3587CNG S1196X# Ex19 1 0.08 85. c.3708delT 3840delT Ex19 1 0.08 86. c.3937CNT Q1313X# Ex21 1 0.08 87. c.3971TNC L1324P Ex22 1 0.08 88. c.4003CNT L1335F Ex22 1 0.08 89. c.4004TNC L1335P Ex22 1 0.08 90. c.4097TNA I1366N Ex22 1 0.08 91. c.4426CNT Q1476X Ex24 1 0.08 92.
X
ABCC7 p.Glu1104Lys 23276700:62:928
status: NEW
Login to comment