ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Arg899Glu

None has been submitted yet.

Publications

PMID: 18449561 [PubMed] Zhou JJ et al: "Identification of positive charges situated at the outer mouth of the CFTR chloride channel pore."

No. Sentence Comment

61 In contrast, K114E, K329E, K892E, and R899E, like wild type, gave almost linear I-V relationships under these conditions. Login to comment
78 The mutations K114E, K329E, K892E, R899E, and R1128E did not affect unitary current amplitude at any voltage (Fig. 4b), consistent with these residues not being involved in Cl- permeation. Login to comment

PMID: 19448737 [PubMed] Zhou JJ et al: "Evidence that extracellular anions interact with a site outside the CFTR chloride channel pore to modify channel properties."

No. Sentence Comment

74 Moreover, reversal of the charge at these sites in ECL4 (in the K892E and R899E mutants) had no effect on unitary Cl-conductance in the presence of high symmetrical Cl- concentrations (Zhou et al. 2008), again consistent with these ECL4 residues not being involved directly in formation of the pore. Login to comment
109 Zhou and Linsdell 391 versing mutations K892E and R899E under different ionic conditions (Zhou et al. 2008). Login to comment

PMID: 25277268 [PubMed] Broadbent SD et al: "The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator is an extracellular chloride sensor."

No. Sentence Comment

82 Furthermore, introducing a lysine residue in place of arginine (R899K) maintained the response to [Cl- ]o (Fig. 2c) while mutating R899 to the negatively charged glutamic acid (R899E) did not, clearly showing that the positive charge at position 899 in ECL4 of CFTR is essential for [Cl- ]o sensing. Login to comment
112 To explore the role of phosphorylation further, we studied the effect of deleting the R domain from CFTR (residues 634-836) [12, 7], which removes all the major PKA/PKC Table 1 Summary of the FSK stimulation of whole cell currents and Erev shifts observed with the CFTR constructs used in this study CFTR Construct n FSK Stimulation (%&#b1;SEM) Erev shift (mV&#b1;SEM) WT (50 bc;M ATP) 5 180&#b1;96 15.0&#b1;3.6 WT (100 bc;M ATP) 6 12,000&#b1;6,000 15.2&#b1;3.0 WT (300 bc;M ATP) 8 1,200&#b1;600 17.0&#b1;3.0 WT (1 mM ATP) 24 13,000&#b1;6,000 23.7&#b1;1.8 WT (1.3 mM ATP) 9 1,400&#b1;900 16.7&#b1;2.6 WT (2 mM ATP) 24 6,100&#b1;5,300 16.7&#b1;1.6 WT (5 mM ATP) 7 1,600&#b1;1,000 20.1&#b1;4.4 WT (50 bc;M ATP + 50 bc;M P-ATP) 7 224&#b1;130 15.3&#b1;1.0 WT + Genistein 4 7,600&#b1;5,200 26.1&#b1;5.4 WT + AMP-PNP 5 2,800&#b1;2,500 21.8&#b1;5.5 WT (3 mM MgCl2) 7 28,000&#b1;17,000 18.3&#b1;3.1 R104Q 5 4,600&#b1;1,600 28.6&#b1;4.7 K114C 5 12,000&#b1;6,700 29.2&#b1;3.0 R117Q 4 33,000&#b1;20,000 30.1&#b1;3.4 K329A 5 13,000&#b1;10,000 33.7&#b1;2.1 R334Q 9 13,000&#b1;6,700 27.3&#b1;2.9 K335A 5 3,200&#b1;1,500 20.8&#b1;7.1 W401G 7 2,600&#b1;1,800 18.5&#b1;4.8 Delta-R (No Stim) 5 - 25.1&#b1;2.7 Delta-R (No FSK, Genistein) 5 140&#b1;13 22.7&#b1;3.0 Delta-R (FSK, No Genistein) 4 89&#b1;14 15.6&#b1;6.0 Delta-R (FSK + Genistein) 6 639&#b1;432 25.1&#b1;4.9 Delta-R-E1371S (No FSK) 9 - 21.4&#b1;4.8 Delta-R-E1371S (FSK) 4 2,600&#b1;1,400 15.3&#b1;4.7 K892Q 7 16,000&#b1;9,500 36.8&#b1;4.8 R899E 4 1,200&#b1;400 25.0&#b1;2.7 R899K 4 1,600&#b1;900 26.6&#b1;2.9 R899Q 7 5,400&#b1;2,800 30.0&#b1;1.3 R899Q + AMP-PNP 4 72,000&#b1;50,000 15.2&#b1;2.8 R899Q-E1371Q (No FSK) 4 - 18.4&#b1;5.9 R899Q-E1371Q (FSK) 6 107&#b1;48 15.6&#b1;3.0 R1128Q 6 14,000&#b1;6,100 41.1&#b1;4.2 Y1219G 6 3,200&#b1;2,500 19.2&#b1;3.3 E1371Q (No FSK) 6 - 25.5&#b1;3.5 E1371Q (FSK) 8 -28&#b1;9 22.3&#b1;4.0 E1371Q (FSK, No ATP, No GTP) 8 270&#b1;130 19.4&#b1;4.5 E1371Q + AMP-PNP (No FSK) 4 - 24.7&#b1;6.5 E1371Q + AMP-PNP (FSK) 8 180&#b1;170 17.4&#b1;4.0 Vector Control 4 15&#b1;38 - FSK stimulation was calculated as the percentage increase in current density at -60 mV from the Erev, after 5-min exposure to 10 bc;M FSK. Login to comment