ABCC7 p.Gln220Glu

[switch to full view]
Comments [show]
Publications
PMID: 17516627 [PubMed] Wehbi H et al: "Role of the extracellular loop in the folding of a CFTR transmembrane helical hairpin."
No. Sentence Comment
83 The Q220E replacement migrates faster than TM3/4 WT, the Q220G and Q220N mutants migrate at equivalent rates to TM3/4 WT, while the Q220W, Q220K, and Q220R substitutions migrate more slowly.
X
ABCC7 p.Gln220Glu 17516627:83:4
status: NEW
Login to comment

90 The Q220E replacement, on the other hand, appeared to enhance the compactness of the TM3/4 WT hairpin.
X
ABCC7 p.Gln220Glu 17516627:90:4
status: NEW
Login to comment

97 When the changes in TM3/4 WT hairpin migration were compared to changes in overall hairpin helicity, a strong correlation (R ) 0.79) was observed (Figure 5), leading us to propose that increases in non-native R-helix structure within ECL2 might Table 1: Migration Behavior on SDS-PAGE Gels of Single and Double Mutants in the Loop Region of CFTR TM3/4 Constructs % change in apparent MW on SDS-PAGE mutant vs TM3/4 WT in WT loop mutantsa vs TM3/4 V232D in V232D loop mutantsa Pb E217G 6.8 ( 0.7 E217S 11.1 ( 3.4 5.4 ( 1.4 0.056 Q220R 15.2 ( 1.1 Q220G 0.3 ( 0.4 Q220N 2.1 ( 1.3 0.5 ( 0.3 0.108 Q220K 14.1 ( 1.0 Q220W 13.1 ( 1.3 11.5 ( 0.9 0.157 Q220E -11.1 ( 1.1 -4.0 ( 0.3 <0.001 S222G 12.0 ( 2.1 1.1 ( 0.6 0.001 S222E -0.3 ( 2.4 1.3 ( 0.5 0.512 E217G/S222G 12.4 ( 1.9 E217S/S222E 26.1 ( 4.5 averagec 10.4 ( 7.3 4.0 ( 4.2 0.067 a Values are the percentage difference vs TM3/4 WT or TM3/4 V232D migration of SDS-PAGE gels.
X
ABCC7 p.Gln220Glu 17516627:97:644
status: NEW
Login to comment

116 We found that the Q220E, S222G, and E217S replacements exhibited a relatively less pronounced effect on migration in the TM3/4 V232D hairpin than the TM3/4 WT background with high (p < 0.01 for Q220E and S222G) or detectable but marginal (p ) 0.056 for E217S) statistical significance.
X
ABCC7 p.Gln220Glu 17516627:116:18
status: NEW
X
ABCC7 p.Gln220Glu 17516627:116:194
status: NEW
Login to comment

146 While there may be a potential charge factor in the migration patterns for certain Q220 mutations (Q220E, Q220K, and Q220R; Figure 3), the migration rates of other ECL2 mutants cannot be rationalized as simple functions of adding or subtracting single charges.
X
ABCC7 p.Gln220Glu 17516627:146:99
status: NEW
Login to comment

147 For example, S222E and WT migrate at approximately the same rate, but Q220E moves at -11% vs WT; both S222G and E217G/S222G are at +12%; Q220K, Q220R, and Q220W are each at +13-15%.
X
ABCC7 p.Gln220Glu 17516627:147:70
status: NEW
Login to comment