ABCMdb

ABCC7 p.Thr338Glu

None has been submitted yet.

Publications

PMID: 11557589 [PubMed] McCarty NA et al: "Identification of a region of strong discrimination in the pore of CFTR."

No. Sentence Comment

61 Mutants K335A, T338E, and T1134E were prepared with the QuickChange protocol (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Login to comment
143 Relative permeabilities for WT and mutant CFTRs for monovalent anions CFTR n NO3 Br SCN I ClO4 Acetate Isethionate Glutamate Gluconate WT 16 1.35Ϯ0.01 1.19Ϯ0.02 2.42Ϯ0.06 0.36Ϯ0.01 0.10Ϯ0.01 0.15Ϯ0.00* 0.24Ϯ0.01 0.24Ϯ0.01 0.18Ϯ0.01 K335A 5 1.35Ϯ0.01 1.36Ϯ0.03 3.10Ϯ0.11† 0.75Ϯ0.02† 0.12Ϯ0.01 0.06Ϯ0.01† 0.07Ϯ0.01† 0.07Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.01† K335F 7 1.51Ϯ0.03† 1.36Ϯ0.02† 2.73Ϯ0.14 0.99Ϯ0.03† 0.20Ϯ0.02† 0.13Ϯ0.01 0.18Ϯ0.03 0.30Ϯ0.02 0.20Ϯ0.02 K335E 5 1.24Ϯ0.04 1.17Ϯ0.02 2.60Ϯ0.06 1.10Ϯ0.03† 0.23Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.01† 0.11Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.01† 0.11Ϯ0.01† T338A 5 1.74Ϯ0.07† 1.59Ϯ0.02† 4.35Ϯ0.24† 2.56Ϯ0.13† 1.84Ϯ0.08† 0.07Ϯ0.01† 0.06Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.01† T338E 3 3.65Ϯ0.19† 1.94Ϯ0.04† 4.29Ϯ0.13† 2.41Ϯ0.24† 1.18Ϯ0.06† 0.16Ϯ0.03 0.37Ϯ0.05† 0.36Ϯ0.01† 0.22Ϯ0.03 T339A 5 1.47Ϯ0.01 1.29Ϯ0.03 2.65Ϯ0.06 0.57Ϯ0.02† 0.24Ϯ0.04 0.10Ϯ0.02 0.19Ϯ0.02 0.18Ϯ0.01 0.15Ϯ0.01 S341A 6 1.91Ϯ0.02† 1.42Ϯ0.01† 3.10Ϯ0.09† 0.59Ϯ0.00*† 0.09Ϯ0.00* 0.11Ϯ0.01† 0.12Ϯ0.00*† 0.11Ϯ0.00*† 0.12Ϯ0.00*† S341E 12 2.01Ϯ0.10† 1.46Ϯ0.05† 2.81Ϯ0.18 0.84Ϯ0.00*† 0.31Ϯ0.03† 0.20Ϯ0.01 0.23Ϯ0.02 0.19Ϯ0.01 0.19Ϯ0.02 S341T 5 1.81Ϯ0.05† 1.39Ϯ0.03 3.15Ϯ0.15† 0.41Ϯ0.01 0.07Ϯ0.00* 0.05Ϯ0.00*† 0.06Ϯ0.00*† 0.03Ϯ0.01† 0.06Ϯ0.01† T1134A 6 1.43Ϯ0.02 1.30Ϯ0.02 2.66Ϯ0.02 0.46Ϯ0.00*† 0.06Ϯ0.00*† 0.08Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.01† 0.11Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.00*† T1134F 5 1.31Ϯ0.07 1.17Ϯ0.05 2.50Ϯ0.10 0.63Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.00* 0.13Ϯ0.01 0.09Ϯ0.01† 0.18Ϯ0.02 0.13Ϯ0.01 T1134E 4 1.68Ϯ0.02† 1.39Ϯ0.05† 2.37Ϯ0.18 0.19Ϯ0.03† 0.20Ϯ0.03 0.06Ϯ0.01† 0.09Ϯ0.01† 0.08Ϯ0.01† 0.10Ϯ0.01† Values are means Ϯ SE with only data from the hyperpolarizing ramp protocol; n, no. of oocytes. Relative permeability, permeability of anion x to that of Cl. Anions are listed in order of increasing ionic radius. Login to comment
167 Selectivity sequences for WT and mutant CFTRs CFTR Selectivity Sequence by Relative Permeability WT SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾisethionateϭglutamateϾgluconateϭacetateϾClO4 K335A SCNϾϾBrϭNO3 ϾClϾIϾϾClO4 Ͼgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetate K335F SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϭIϾϾglutamateϾgluconateϭClO4 ϭisethionateϾacetate K335E SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϭIϾClϾϾClO4 Ͼgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetate T338A SCNϾϾIϾϾClO4 ϭNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetate T338E SCNϾNO3 ϾIϾBrϾClO4 ϾClϾϾisethionateϭglutamateϾgluconateϭacetate T339A SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾClO4 ϭisethionateϭglutamateϭgluconateϾacetate S341A SCNϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetateϭClO4 S341E SCNϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾIϾϾClO4 Ͼisethionateϭacetateϭglutamateϭgluconate S341T SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾClO4 ϭisethionateϭgluconateϭacetateϭglutamate T1134A SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾglutamateϭisethionateϭgluconateϭacetateϭClO4 T1134F SCNϾϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾIϾϾglutamateϾacetateϭgluconateϾisethionateϭClO4 T1134E SCNϾNO3 ϾBrϾClϾϾClO4 ϭIϾgluconateϭisethionateϭglutamateϭacetate L856 A REGION OF STRONG DISCRIMINATION IN THE CFTR PORE AJP-Lung Cell Mol Physiol • VOL 281 • OCTOBER 2001 • www.ajplung.org out propagation to distant sites. Login to comment
191 Relative conductances for WT and mutant CFTRs for monovalent anions CFTR n NO3 Br SCN I ClO4 Acetate Isethionate Glutamate Gluconate WT 16 0.87Ϯ0.01 0.77Ϯ0.01 0.18Ϯ0.01 0.25Ϯ0.01 0.23Ϯ0.01 0.55Ϯ0.01 0.50Ϯ0.01 0.57Ϯ0.02 0.56Ϯ0.02 K335A 5 0.88Ϯ0.04 0.77Ϯ0.02 0.30Ϯ0.02† 0.35Ϯ0.02 0.24Ϯ0.02 0.33Ϯ0.01† 0.32Ϯ0.02† 0.37Ϯ0.02† 0.38Ϯ0.02† K335F 7 1.21Ϯ0.05† 0.87Ϯ0.02† 0.55Ϯ0.02† 0.36Ϯ0.01† 0.19Ϯ0.01 0.34Ϯ0.01† 0.34Ϯ0.01† 0.41Ϯ0.01† 0.37Ϯ0.01† K335E 5 1.16Ϯ0.05† 0.91Ϯ0.02† 0.59Ϯ0.02† 0.51Ϯ0.02† 0.28Ϯ0.01 0.22Ϯ0.01† 0.25Ϯ0.01† 0.22Ϯ0.01† 0.24Ϯ0.01† T338A 5 1.20Ϯ0.13† 1.03Ϯ0.06† 0.98Ϯ0.12† 0.82Ϯ0.02† 0.50Ϯ0.04† 0.18Ϯ0.05† 0.08Ϯ0.01† 0.31Ϯ0.05† 0.29Ϯ0.05† T338E 3 3.66Ϯ0.36† 1.53Ϯ0.09† 1.80Ϯ0.12† 1.39Ϯ0.11† 0.87Ϯ0.03† 0.36Ϯ0.04† 0.56Ϯ0.17 0.44Ϯ0.03† 0.48Ϯ0.03† T339A 5 1.01Ϯ0.02† 0.77Ϯ0.03 0.22Ϯ0.01 0.31Ϯ0.03 0.23Ϯ0.01 0.38Ϯ0.02† 0.48Ϯ0.01 0.48Ϯ0.01 0.52Ϯ0.01 S341A 6 1.67Ϯ0.01† 1.08Ϯ0.01† 0.63Ϯ0.03† 0.26Ϯ0.00* 0.15Ϯ0.01† 0.63Ϯ0.01† 0.54Ϯ0.02 0.63Ϯ0.01 0.63Ϯ0.01 S341E 12 1.74Ϯ0.11† 1.14Ϯ0.02† 1.81Ϯ0.06† 0.48Ϯ0.01† 0.35Ϯ0.02† 0.28Ϯ0.01† 0.69Ϯ0.02† 0.65Ϯ0.01† 0.68Ϯ0.01† S341T 5 0.85Ϯ0.02 0.82Ϯ0.01 0.29Ϯ0.01† 0.22Ϯ0.01 0.13Ϯ0.01† 0.48Ϯ0.01 0.45Ϯ0.02 0.43Ϯ0.02 0.55Ϯ0.01 T1134A 6 0.83Ϯ0.02 0.78Ϯ0.01 0.24Ϯ0.01† 0.21Ϯ0.01 0.09Ϯ0.01† 0.39Ϯ0.01† 0.38Ϯ0.01† 0.39Ϯ0.01† 0.40Ϯ0.01 T1134F 5 0.68Ϯ0.03† 0.69Ϯ0.03† 0.36Ϯ0.01† 0.07Ϯ0.01† 0.16Ϯ0.01 0.48Ϯ0.02 0.30Ϯ0.02† 0.22Ϯ0.01† 0.32Ϯ0.02† T1134E 4 0.99Ϯ0.02† 1.00Ϯ0.02† 0.50Ϯ0.02† 0.20Ϯ0.03 0.26Ϯ0.02 0.32Ϯ0.03† 0.34Ϯ0.01† 0.34Ϯ0.03† 0.34Ϯ0.03† Values are means Ϯ SE with only data from the hyperpolarizing ramp protocol; n, no. of oocytes. Relative conductance, conductance of anion x to that of Cl. Anions are listed in order of increasing ionic radius. Login to comment
213 Vrev Cl in ND96 bath solution for WT and mutant CFTRs CFTR n Vrev Cl WT 16 -21.24Ϯ0.59 K335A 5 -22.12Ϯ0.35 K335F 7 -21.92Ϯ0.90 K335E 5 -22.88Ϯ0.36 T338A 5 -26.97Ϯ0.79* T338E 3 -20.58Ϯ1.07 T339A 5 -22.21Ϯ0.98 S341A 6 -21.21Ϯ0.56 S341E 12 -28.77Ϯ1.36* S341T 5 -26.62Ϯ1.43* T1134A 6 -28.33Ϯ1.23* T1134F 5 -19.74Ϯ0.73 T1134E 4 -27.54Ϯ1.27* Values are means Ϯ SE; n, no. of oocytes. Login to comment
276 S341E CFTR exhibited a larger shift in Vrev Cl and pronounced outward rectification, whereas T338E CFTR exhibited pronounced inward rectification. Login to comment
277 The opposite patterns of macroscopic rectification in T338E CFTR and S341E CFTR suggest that these two positions may lie on opposite sides of a barrier in the pore. Login to comment
283 Px/PCl was increased in T338E CFTR for all anions except acetate and gluconate. Login to comment
284 As in T338A CFTR, PClO4/PCl stands out as most sensitive to mutation at this position because PClO4/PCl was increased 18-fold in T338A CFTR and 11-fold in T338E CFTR. Login to comment
285 Mutation T338E resulted in increased Gx/GCl values for all anions smaller than acetate, whereas Gx/GCl values for acetate, glutamate, and gluconate were decreased. Login to comment
289 Comparing S341E with S341A CFTR and T338E with T338A CFTR, we can see that the introduction of a negative charge at S341 more strongly destabilized the binding of SCN- (which is pronounced in WT CFTR) than did the equivalent mutation at T338. Login to comment
320 In fact, mutations T338E and S341E led to channels that could barely distinguish between monovalent anions. Login to comment
357 Mutation K335E led to a slight decrease in GS2O3/GCl, whereas mutations T338E and S341E greatly increased GS2O3/GCl. Login to comment
388 Selectivity between Cl- and the divalent anion S2O3 2CFTR n GS2O3/GCl WT 16 0.39Ϯ0.01 K335A 5 0.37Ϯ0.01 K335F 7 0.39Ϯ0.01 K335E 5 0.34Ϯ0.01* T338A 5 0.38Ϯ0.01 T338E 3 0.70Ϯ0.08* T339A 5 0.39Ϯ0.02 S341A 6 0.27Ϯ0.01* S341E 12 0.54Ϯ0.01* S341T 5 0.38Ϯ0.01 T1134A 6 0.34Ϯ0.02 T1134F 5 0.33Ϯ0.01* T1134E 4 0.44Ϯ0.05 Values are means Ϯ SE; n, no. of oocytes. Login to comment
394 Unfortunately, the single-channel conductance of charge mutants at this position (e.g., T338E compared with T338Q) was not studied to determine whether electrostatic repulsion occurred due to the introduction of charge. Login to comment
457 4) T338E CFTR exhibits pronounced inward rectification in the macroscopic I-V, whereas S341E CFTR exhibits pronounced outward rectification (Fig. 5). Login to comment